If you ever start to feel the deeply entrenched socialized guilt for not giving men a fair shake creeping back up on you, if you ever start to think "the men in *my* life are different and special, somehow," just remember.....you could never ever ever hate men as much as they hate you.
How many more women have to be terrorized before we can acknowledge the problem?
#kam2026#i hate men#female separatism#kill all moids
> How do we get moids to rope faster?
I need a way to actively participate to get those numbers up, we cannot keep living like this.
> i still like my "act as china's proxy" plan. the chinese supply the lsd in the water supply/ shock collars/ drones/ explosive collars or whatever, along with a few technical advisors, and women rule over/ cull moids in the form of a puppet state
> asking the important questions. Maybe if males roping themselves is fetishized somehow, that would get the numbers up. Besides that, we need to ask ourselves, what topic really, really gets them depressed to their core?
> Their very existence makes them depressed. Deep within every scrote, even the most braindead is a neuron that is aware their existence will be rendered completely obsolete the moment synthesized sperm becomes mainstream.
Males lack inner beauty, love, compassion, empathy, or joy. They cope by oppressing women, but no matter what they do to us, the reality is still there. Women are the bringers of love and life, and men are the bringers of hatred and death death.
I and countless others would love for males to be able to internalize this information and manifest it into mass suicide instead of externalizing it. But I think the only solution to the male question is widespread misandry.
Men know they are shit, which is why they talk and act the way they do. They are ironically much more easy to crack, so long as specific protective measures are taken to avoid taking damage from his inevitable melties when ego is under threat. Once they feel insulated from consequences, and once he realizes that there is absolutely nothing he can do to prevent or punish disclosure, he will readily open up. It’s cathartic to them to be vulnerable enough to discuss their “demons” and not face rejection for it. I do not recommend attempting it, since even without a candid confession, moids are not clever enough to obscure what they are, especially not when every other male in existence is doing their part to blow their cover in some way or another. They are extremely obvious to read if you have a modicum of pattern recognition and aren’t currently gaslighting yourself into refusing to read them.
The effort getting honesty out of any particular male is neither worth the investment nor the risk. When a man feels truly “vulnerable”, he will inevitably just admit his struggle to manage his excessive entitlement in a world that refuses to validate it, and his violent, rapey, pedophilic tendencies. We already knew all that, but the male still thinks his “demons” are special and absolutely must be concealed. The male is a safe with a turd inside located in a museum exhibit called “safes with turds inside”.
Moids are extremely fragile, intrasexually competitive, sexually neurotic, prone to externalization/externalizing their locus of control, transactional, and lack empathy (this last point cannot be overstated). This combination of traits, otherwise known as Normative Male Retardation, is the impetus of the “moid take”. “Moid takes” become the zeitgeist if and when moids are given the power force them into pseudo-existence. If he cannot effectively insist himself, he looks to the past for evidence, where men before him have once manifested his delusions. He invents or misconstrues doctrine (science and religion) for evidence. He cherry-picks fringe cases (often the result of previous male contrivance anyways) for evidence, or just convinces himself his own lies are as good as evidence, because if what he believed wasn’t true, why would he believe it? He will do anything and everything before he admits he must adapt, choosing instead at every turn to somehow manipulate reality itself to suit him instead. Even if it’s only in theory, he can only ever believe he is right. NMR is the reason. (...)
Their empathy deficit and neurosis are so high, they cannot accurately discern women’s incentives and conditions. He does not understand the world as an environment shared by actors with entirely different perspectives, approaches, goals, etc. Women are especially enigmatic, since they are so unalike him. He only understands reality where his thoughts are objective. His “objective” beliefs predictably clash with a subjective reality. Since he is deficient, his idea of reality is similarly deficient. This makes him fragile, and increasingly fragile the more dissonant his ideas and approach becomes. He lacks the ability to predict, plan, and adapt. The only way he can relieve his discomfort of living in a constant state of myopia is through aspiring towards absolute control.
For many men, yapping is the only remaining tool at his disposal to manipulate his surroundings, and he is primarily focused on getting women to comply. It’s very important to him, since ensuring reproduction is in second order to ensuring that his heart keeps beating. Actually, that’s debatable. I’m pretty sure males only keep their hearts beating because they might miss out on some insemination opportunities if they let it stop.
> Tesla was based, he knew men were worse than women and women were superior. Towards the end of his life he thought society ran by women would be much better
> He got very close to reaching the final stage of male exclusive existential grief in accepting his true position in the world. A man capable of just peering into that void is going to also have the intelligence, ingenuity, and introspection to do other genius things. The moid struggle is both horrific to experience as well as entertaining to observe. I both like and dislike Tesla and men like him. I wish we could just put them all into a zoo and observe them like animals.
I hate when men use “theory of mind”, it only ever demonstrates how they themselves lack theory of mind. Not agreeing with or tolerating someone’s behaviors doesn’t mean you are completely oblivious to what, how, and why they behave the way they do. Criminal psychologists for example can develop a very accurate model for the minds of murderers, and the fact that they aren’t condoning and enabling murdering doesn’t mean they’re bad at their job.
It’s the same moid logic that has them parading around their “toxic empathy” talking point. They just lack a robust sense of self and have no principles, and believe if you understand someone/something that means you have to comply and obey. No wonder they’re so submissive and love hierarchies. If someone tells them what to do they’ll do it, so their only defense they have is refusing to listen. Then when women don’t fall in line with what they want, they just project and say she lacks the willingness or capacity to listen.
If he’s right he should be damn thankful. Women projecting a greater level of humanity on moids than they actually possess benefits moids infinitely more than not. Little disruptive Timmy getting his feeling hurt after reprimanded because his teacher “expects better of him” is the same type of woman who thinks she can bring her abusive husband to the light if she just could just coax it out of him. Go ahead and take away women’s grace by forcing them to accept male primitive nature. Timmy will be happy when you stop trying to force him to read and let him snack other boys with sticks, until he grows up and can’t find a replacement mommy to take care of his violent, illiterate ass.
Wonderful things exist in spite of males, not because of them. The male creates things he believes may be wonderful, only in attempts to assuage the existential madness, the consequence of rebuking the gift of awareness bestowed upon him in order to pursue proliferation. He resents that he must create just enough not to die, and this applies to everything he does. He is not happy in the society he produces, but he can’t not produce it, since it’s all he knows, and is too afraid of being lost to irrelevance to change. Awareness cannot be easily excised from the minds of men, and his misery is his curse, one that can only be relieved so long as he is never permitted to have what he wants.
If your idea of “creation” is a teeming swarm of biomass subsisting on as little as possible in order replicate and degrade themselves even more, then yes, moids are certainly creative. They love creating something that’s not quite death but somehow worse and more terrifying. Do just enough to thrust their genes in a hole unwilling, whatever refuse left after his diabolical idea of a union is fulfilled, that is his creation, his legacy. Only someone who doesn’t know any better would think the pile of discarded shit deserves its own plaque, because all you’ve ever known was a man’s shit. You’re a fool to believe any man proclaiming his own obsessive compulsion to breed at all costs has driven this world towards goodness, let alone pioneered it. The only thing that progresses this world in relation to men is in how many of them you can shove off of it.
As for gay men, they only become actively aggressive towards women when they feel threatened that women will somehow cut off their cum supply. They are envious that women can get the dick they want, and sometimes believe that if they can belittle or bully them, then somehow, some way, a straight man out there will finally be convinced to fuck him instead. It’s mostly petty, and not nearly as damaging as the harm men can and will do if they know for sure abusing you will immediately get them what they want. Straight men have a monopoly on misogynistic abuse because abusing women directly gets them access to what they want, pussy. Abusing women does not directly get gay men access to straight men’s cocks, so they do it less, and less intensely. If the only way for gay moids to get cock was killing women they would definitely do it, but the world just doesn’t work that way. Gay men are not more moral than straight men, they are just not often put in situations where the investment of abuse is worth the reward. If a gay moid wants to fuck a male child, the only way for him to do so is to abuse said child. The rates of child molestation for homosexual moids match pace if not outpace heterosexual moids.
Gay moids are men who think and act just like men. They aren’t a much of a threat as straight men only because they lack the tools and incentives, but in situations where they can abuse to get what they want, they do it just like straight men do. If all moids were gay, our societies would reflect this behavior. Women would be shamed and belittled but not pursued, more poor scrotes would be sex trafficked, the SA rate of little would exceed that of girls. Is it’s better society? Honestly, yes, if only because less children will be born into it since gay moids don’t want to impregnate women as much as the straight ones do. The dysfunction doesn’t stop, it just gets transferred. I don’t feel honored in being a martyr for male dysfunction so I am neutral. You could walk around at night in public without the fear of getting raped when all men are faggots, at least there’s that.
> All porn serves a dual purpose. Wanking is secondary, the primary one is supplying the moid with maladaptive copes he craves so much. One of them is selling the moid a deluded idea that he's "showing" irl women what they have to "compete" with, that he has "options". It's how they avenge the fact that it's much easier for you to diversify. That's why moids think of ethots and pornstars as actual gfs. No matter how "intelligent", they actually do on some level think that they have a real chance and that's how they get robbed blind. Ethots make moid narcissism and Dunning-Kruger work for them.
If you have ever been in a long term relationship, you have probably noticed that your moid suddenly wants you to dress more conservatively, gets uncomfortable about you speaking to other males and wants you to get pregnant as soon as possible. This is moid "securing" behavior. It doesn't mean that he is serious about you or that he loves you, what it means is that he wants to reduce your number of other readily available options to soothe his inherent anxiety over fidelity. Of course once he achieves this he won't be happy and he will hate you, because moids are generally at their happiest pouring resources into a void, stuck chasing a carrot on a stick forever
> Daily reminder that if you have a scrot, looking like you're ready to cheat on him any minute is how you keep him happy and interested. All men are fidelity-anxious cucks by nature, but their tastes are based entirely on what other men find attractive.
> So in summary the scrots who read lolcow fantasize about us being their unwilling sex partners/gfs
> No, they fantasize about being people. Moids are deeply traumatized by the realization that they are slaves to sexual arousal, it clashes with their grandiose self image. Porn is capitalizing on their petty need to "avenge" that somehow. Like most porn, moid copefics generally revolve around a theme of regaining control/upper hand in response to having a boner and "punishing" whatever it is that made them horny. The moid in question is trying to repair the anal fissure he sustained from having his defense mechanisms ripped to shreds (which no doubt aroused him too)
You can’t explain it, not the profound sadness that most if not all women experience on the basis of being born women and being able to empathize with women. The type of sadness that relates to the assumption (or lack thereof) of a woman’s personhood, freedom, dignity, legitimacy, and autonomy. If seeing women as human, even in theory, may cost him a single orgasm, he will not do it. Nothing relating women will be approached or explored with curiosity or empathy. Only misogyny.(...)
No, men will never understand why women are sad as women. This perspective, if ever presented, simply would not register, and certainly never be seen as a valid assessment according to any value system he deems rational. It will never be anything worthy of a moral repudiation or an emotional response. Never.
They choose instead to believe that women are sad because they weren’t hot and young enough to be sex trafficked themselves. Men can only believe women are sad when men deny them, but the worst, most brutal, most painful, most heartbreaking sadness almost always comes when men pursue them. It’s so utterly backwards it feels like the only thing capable of getting through their skulls is a damn bullet.
I wish a race of aliens came to earth and found these ugly fuckers so valuable, desirable, and indispensable, they abduct, imprison, rape, and an anally impregnate them. They’ll finally be happy living life on “easy mode” by being Glorp’s concubines.
(...)
Moids only use their brain matter to invent novel ways of being retarded. They have given us many new retarded methods to calculate now to best land their squirt in a hole. The only thing men are exceptionally good at is the production of sperm which far exceeds its demand. If you lived on a planet where all of your gametes were special and mattered, you could be milked like a cow too. You can finally find your niche in Glorp’s bed chambers.
women are not oppressed cus of sexual dimorphism. it’s a very surface level childish analysis. women are the sex with the ability to produce large, resource rich gametes & moids are the sex who can only produce small, inferior gametes.
reproduction, the process through which our species replicates itself occurs because moids impose costs & women bear them. this is why women are oppressed. a male is a parasite by nature & its biological purpose is to replicate its y chromosome at the expense of the host (women).
tomorrow, women could wake up with male bodies and moids with female bodies and moids would still find a way to oppress women because of our one glaring defect; our empathy. we are the sex that gives birth & is biologically wired to look after creatures that don’t look like us.
this is where the empathy gap arises from. this is why scrotes are inherently selfish and evil & will remain this way. no amount of socialisation is going to change this btw. this is where both feminism & radical feminism fails. it has achieved a lot thankfully but it ends here.
in other words: nature/evolution basically came up with the worst possible combination it could. evil moids and retarded women. evil never stop committing evil and retarded never learns. now ofc, some women are exceptions to this. humanity depends on them.
Concerningly, the societies that are created by the system of incel affirmative action are truly terrible, and only become increasingly more terrible as more genetic trash is dumped onto the planet. How many incels have been artificially kept alive and flourishing, only to burden others? Consuming resources, reproducing. 8 billion people on this planet and the quality of our lives has not gone up in proportion. Rather, these incel spawn are a tumor that exist only to inflate the political power of one moid nation vs another moid nation, in a international dick-measuring contest. Male societies are pyramid schemes where women and children are sacrificed for endless growth and destruction. Is it really any wonder why the human genome has stagnated since the neolithic era? Instead of prioritizing quality and conservation, males would prefer to live on an overpopulated trash planet so long as some of the inhabitants share their genetic code. They are naturally inclined to be serfs. Just look at how homosocially attracted they are to men they perceive as their superiors, their endless search for father figures. It's pathetic, disgusting, destructive.
In the animal kingdom, and this also includes humans, you can see in our genome that the majority of our ancestors were female. Roughly 80% of males who ever lived on this earth never saw their genes passed down, never had their chance to "live eternally" in the only way the drone knows how. In response to the damning effects of female sexual selection on the average male, they have grown to hate us as well as covet us. I can reiterate infinitely how this influences how they perceive and treat women. Males are parasites. They are incomplete creatures who absolutely need women to become complete, but their appetite is insatiable. They will endlessly consume women and still never be satisfied, they will drive the entire planet into the ground and never be satisfied. They have no goals or aspirations, or any idea of laws or forces larger and more important than themselves. Their universe begins and ends with them, in their lizard-brained glory.
In short, we need to genetically engineer raccoon bfs before these hairy unevolved apes continue with their bullshit any longer.
> I'm of the opinion that trying to be the bigger person only serves the moids and makes you the ultimate pickme. Only be exclusive when you're getting the best possible deal. If he's cheating, it's perfectly fine for you to cheat too.
While you're out there clinging to the female exclusivity meme, your moid is preparing to install Tinder, Bumble and PlentyOfFish the moment you get pregnant. The money that you faithfully contribute towards his rent goes to Belle Delphine's cuckreon.
> Obviously men are sexually useless, but some women still want PIV so it would be a "benefit" for her I suppose. Obviously anyone can branch out for other things they feel they're missing.
Don't get me wrong, I fully agree that moids are overall not worth your time because nature made it so you only lose by getting involved with them (while moids only gain). In a perfect world, not bothering to tard wrangle them would be the most efficient thing to do.
But most women in the world are straight and still desire male company to some extent, or simply unable to cut contact with all scrots due to circumstances. While there's no way to eliminate these women's losses, they can be somewhat minimized.
> Beautiful men are a rarity. That's the reality that no one wants to admit. And those rare beautiful men are hated because they show how ugly the average moid is. Masculinity is just ugliness rebranded.
> And here's the part no one is ready for: while the baseline ugliness of males is elevated due to resource coercion, (comparatively) beautiful males would still be a minority due to the fundamental premise of mammalian sexual dimorphism - only a few select males are meant to breed. Long term pair bonding and inclusion of sexually mature males in the family unit are unnatural and harmful to genetic quality in the long run. This is likely a result of adult males adapting to "farm" female maternal attachment to make it encompass themselves.
If resource coercion didn't exist, high mutation rate and innate genetic "defectiveness" of males would probably still produce 90% of (relative) subhumans and 10% of breedables.
> Appearance is the absolute measure of genetic quality, which in turn is a measure of health
You know what species of females that almost always gets their way? Birds. Smart, beautiful, majestic, free, social, involved and considerate parents both male and female. Everyone love birds, most not knowing the reason they love birds is because female birds made them lovable. Everyone hates bedbugs. Bedbugs are bedbugs because bedbug moids made them what they are. Moids only know how to breed in hate. Moids make themselves reprehensible, to themselves, to their females, to their offspring, even to other species. Reject male choice TODAY. Deny a male his autonomy TODAY. They will only ever drag you to hell if you do not. Judge and shit test these moids RIGHT NOW. They will turn your granddaughters of the future into bedbugs, and no I am NOT KIDDING. You owe it to your granddaughters. Tolerate no nonsense from these creatures. In fact, make their lives HARDER. You may be anxious at the idea of it after years and years of buckbreaking attempts and propaganda, but it is actually ENJOYABLE to be a bitch for a great cause. Possibly the most enjoyable experience on earth. Be BRAVE and be FREE. Look at this bird. Your granddaughters deserve the life of a bird. If you cannot do it for you, do it for HER.
if women were in power men would be happier.
First of all women would only allow men of good stock to even be born. Incels would never have to suffer because their existence simply wouldn't happen. A moid born in a woman controlled world would be a happy and fulfilled chad. His days would be spent working and breeding. He wouldn't be burdened with the expectations of commitment or leadership, never corrupted by a homosocial moid culture.
He would be a glorified beast of burden, never having to think, never experiencing semination anxiety. He would know his place and his purpose.
He is miserable because women don't have enough rights yet.
Gynarchism isn't just an "alternative"; it’s the natural biological correction for a species that’s been off the rails since the patriarchy started LARPing as leaders.
To take this from a community effort to a full-blown Gynarchist State in America, we need to lean harder into the biological supremacy angle. We have to stop treating their "shortcomings" as bugs and start treating them as features of an inferior specimen. A female-led nation-state works because women are biologically optimized for long-term survival, social cohesion, and high-level cognitive processing. The strength portion is easily negligible since sex differences are bigger within sex than outside of it. Moids are literally just a developmental detour—high-variance, low-utility primates driven by a Y-chromosome that is essentially a genetic glitch. Our propaganda should reflect that: women are the default, the evolved, and the divine; moids are the draft version that never got polished.
- Genetic Stewardship: Reproduction must be entirely clinical and female-controlled. The "family unit" is a moid invention to ensure property rights over women. In a true Gynarchy, moids are just biological resources—distilled to their utility and then returned to the labor pool.
- The Aesthetic Mandate: Since moids exist to center women, their only value outside of labor is their aesthetics as defined by the female gaze. If they aren’t being useful or pleasing to look at, they are taking up oxygen that a woman could be using.
The goal is a total psychological break. Once they realize they are nothing more than a servant class designed for the "tedious and time-consuming," they’ll actually be happier. It’s the "undeveloped primate brain" finally finding its place in the dirt where it belongs.
The only resource moids care about is sex, and the only motivation they can have for anything is sex. (...)
Much of the male thought, no matter how profound, is typically rooted in some variety of sexual inadequacy or preoccupation (see Freud, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, literally all of them). Any seemingly valid ideology can and will be appropriated by moids to do what they are biologically programmed to do - monopolize resources for sexual access and spread their worthless sperm indiscriminately. Much like when gay rights were immediately hijacked by NAMBLA, leftist movements were always traditionally full of sex pests who object not to exploitation of women but to the idea that women aren't socialized and redistributed among the worst and weakest of men. This results in penile doublethink in which women are simultaneously a means of production and also some kind of sexual bourgeoisie consciously withholding a 'vital' 'resource' from moids.
Women's view of socialism as a means to provide fairly for everyone is a reflection of our evolutionary niche - females are programmed to care about the 'other' and see everyone as family/offspring/tribe. Men's optimal strategy is to breed as much as possible while investing as little as possible. Being glorified extensions of their gametes, men see socialism as a way to 'game' their evolutionary niche and gain sexual access without having to wrangle the male hierarchy. Leftism is absolutely a conscious beta male's cry for a chance at genetic perpetuation, whereas right wingers are mostly of the temporarily embarrassed millionaire variety. The left cuck knows he's a cuck so he wants a sexual handout, the right wing cuck is still in denial and thinks he's gonna be Chad with a harem one day.
In the end, they're both sentient sperm sacks with an inherently opportunistic mentality. Everything else is just PR.
I remember arguing with a nonna on here who refused to believe me when I say that males ultimately crave to be raped.
I would even say that misogyny, at its core, is a man’s rebellion over the fact he isn’t worthy of rape, and his jealousy over women because thinks they are.
For troons, the solution is retarded yet fairly straightforward. He becomes rapable by becoming a woman. He becomes worthy. He is more worthy the more he can prove he is rapable, the more he proves he is a woman. Notice how TiMs only complain about being TiMs because when they feel unsexy (unrapable). Notice how TiMs only brag about being TiMs when they feel sexy (rapable). Even when they’re “complaining” about “being rapable” (literally), it’s a point of pride. Humble bragging over being “forced” into sex work and getting “unwanted” chaser attention, giggling and blushing over “validating misogyny” from “TIRMs”. In fact they even invent lies about lesbians and TERFs wanting to rape them, because that’s the best marker of success he can think of.
Moids are driven to create the conditions that best resemble him being raped. Since it’s impossible to command a woman’s will, he can never make her think “I want to rape him”. Typically, he substitutes her want for her need. He forces women to accept his role as “the provider”, and her helpless to resist. He fabricates the conditions required for a woman to depend on him for her survival (staying alive, since he can’t barter with his worthless gametes), where the default is for him to depend on her for his survival (reproduction). She now needs him, instead of him needing her. His power and resources become his coveted fertile womb. He’s necessary. He’s important. He’s so important and so necessary a women would die without him (he’ll make sure of that!)
His insistence that he should be rapable bleeds into all that he believes, or wants to believe. His sense of self, his ego, relies entirely on his ability to trick himself into thinking he is rapable. He wants to feel raped even while he is raping. The woman/child seduced him. She was asking for it. No, demanding it, and since he is helpless to his lust that she controls. She basically raped him.
It all comes down to rape, which is to say, being so necessary and important you inspire a want so commanding that others must take.
I truly believe every moid in existence should be raped at least once. I know it wouldn’t make them reconsider their actions, but they’re way too comfortable seeing rape as some light crime like stealing and not a literal violation of one’s humanity just because it mostly happens to women/girls. Or god forbid ‘destruction of property’ if the victim already had a boyfriend/husband/father.
Most of you need to understand that moid wants are not logical if you zoom out. Moids evolved to have wants that only make sense in the short term because they are disposable. The moid's short term interest is monopolization of mates, and everything that appears to be "reasoning" in a moid is a mere post hoc rationalization of base short term instincts. It doesn't matter if eventually he'll have to resort to inbreeding to keep the guaranteed wives flowing, or that all of his epik chad son lineage will be deformed and uncompetitive in the long run. It doesn't matter that the moid will eventually die in a war as a result of society that he created. Because of lower offspring investment, the long term welfare of said offspring (and by extension society) simply isn't part of the moid's program on a purely biological level.
The same reason even cis gay moids sometimes give up and marry their faghags for end of life comfort. A male is parasitic. A femboy and a cis male = two males. A parasite cannot parasitize on a parasite.
Even if you weren't a delusional bricky shim and were actually a young cis woman with a dick looks wise, you are simply not a suitable host. You're a man - psychologically externalizing, unpleasant, aggressive, non-nurturing, egotistical, impulsive and devoid of self awareness - you are not equipped to absorb the impact of another male's incessant testeria. Contrary to what femboys commonly believe, you cannot anticipate another man's needs just because you're a man yourself - no man wants to deal with men's bullshit and that's the reason why there's no worse punishment for a moid than to be confined amongst other moids. It doesn't even need to be mentioned that you're a flagrantly mentally ill man, with levels of batshittery vastly exceeding standard male levels - any real life union between you and another man will blow up in mutual homicidal ideation or bug chasing within months, if not weeks.
Your meek whining on Twitter doesn't mean you're "submissive" (aka caring and self sacrificing) in the sense women are - you're just a weak, petty omega. Cishet moids grow up being coddled, first by their mommies and then by a myriad of women they're surrounded with - they know a man will deck them in the face instead of lovingly tard wrangling them for years. This is why, regrettably, a moid will always choose the ugliest possible cis woman over you.
Moid psychology and their relationships with women all stem from their envy and self hatred. They hate so much that they need us, but they won't let us go. They can never be free and actualized individuals separate from women because they literally can't be. Their egos won't allow it, and even if the could manage it would all be for naught since the parasite will die without a host. Monks dedicate their entire lives freeing themselves from their male obsession they have towards women, and for their efforts they will die alone without any progeny. That's why misogyny always manifests as women being controlled and enslaved, never simply absconded or abandoned (like misandrist are towards men). They need us and they hate that they need us. Deep in the most ancient and primal part of their brain stem is the need for us. They want us to pay for how much they need us, because it's just not fair.
A moid is just a primitive, defective parasitic machine who wants the world to be free and open for him to indulge. Free and open, but only for him. Because this would never manifest without him first being anointed “god” of reality (the whole universe agrees he is the main character), he is just an angry, confused, ineffective thing. He has to come up with strange coping mechanisms to explain the incongruity between his idea of the universe where he himself is god, and the real universe where he isn’t.
Compartmentalization is one of these copes. Where he rightfully assesses that the outside world constantly denies him, so he makes an “alt” mode in cases where he sees he can take/indulge. When the conditions do not exist for him to successfully benefit from his “alt” mode, it also doesn’t exist. Seeking sex (goon alt), seeking connection (yearn alt). The post nut-clarity phenomenon they speak of demonstrates this very clearly. It’s a total alt shut-down, tied to a very specific material condition (arousal vs refractory period).
The moid is a gooner until he is a lovesick yearner. He is never himself, who is both at the same time.
Moids go into like fugue states where they are either porn-manic degenerates or self-pitying “I missed out on highschool love”/“I would marry that cashier and bleed out on the streets for her”. If you catch him fancying either state, he denies the existence of the other. It’s Schrödinger’s moid.
This is why they say retarded shit like “only men are capable of real unconditional love” while also saying the very next day “all men want is sex, they don’t care about women as people”. He may sincerely believe he’s not lying when he does this, because he is cognitively impaired. Part of their brains seem to affectively shut down and reactivate whenever it deems necessary.
I only slaughter my male animals. I'm not trying to be a better feminist, I'm trying to be a better misandrist.
(just kidding, I slaughter the males because if you let them get too numerous and too old they will try to rape the females to death. There have been times I had to slaughter males even when I had a 10 to 1 ratio because one scrote animal picks a favorite female to torment. Also the females just aren't as good for meat unless you are talking something like a hog.) Unless he's a bird of paradise or some other sort of animal where the female can just outright reject your sperm, the moids of the species are just obnoxious, parasitic terrorists. I personally wish some sort of apex predator existed that would occasionally pick off the worst of the human frontpoles.
I think children and the mentally retarded can be "groomed". Adults with sound intelligence should know better should they not? If women had the mentality of not allowing grooming and not allowing it to proceed in the first place in their own cut off personalized lives, and not trusting males it likely wouldn't be a thing right? How many women groom other women?; It's negligible. This is a massive blackpill if women stopped participating in trafficking it would cease to exist overnight. If women spoke up about grooming more and spoke honestly about it that males are predatory, and that grooming victims are retarded women with pickme brain rot being taken advantage of until it was something recognized by ape law, formally it may have the slightest bit of a punishment and deterrent for groomers and maybe these idiotic women who are groomed and victims to their own pickme programming would see it as a bad thing. But evidently most women don't see it as existing, consider males more valuable as groomers, or that it's not important enough because it only affects retarded women who put themselves in dangerous situations who have pickme brain rot to trust predatory rape apes. This is similiar to how the rape of partners is seen legally in honesty by males, where women are blamed for trusting apes because they should know better than to trust apes. Even man made law admit this caveat; if you trust rape apes you shouldn't be surprised when the ape rapes. Men admit this and remind women of this, men make any protection from them illegal or difficult to reach yet women still trust them. That's pure brainrot and masochism. If you want to call this slut shaming or victim blaming, sure. Sluts deserve to be shamed for their own masochism and you can't really be a victim if you've chosen to go down with the moid rape chimp ship, I'll remind that I'm only talking about women who are raped by their own trusted ape partners. An adult woman being "groomed" which I suppose is code for made into a brainrotted prostitute is incredibly pathetic, especially in a developed economy with safety nets.
The vast majority of women are already living in their ideal world and in a self-imposed situation as close to their ideal life as possible. From gathering what libradbihetfems are lamenting about online, it's clear that all they want are some upgrades to the status quo. Some of which include:
being able to score a reformed moid her looksmatch who can give her lots of orgasms so she doesn't have to fake it anymore (source: online radfem whining) get the 1% of men that wear dresses to stop doing that because deep down she loves the gender dynamicbonus points for making single people subsidize child care costs and society coddle mothers even more than it already does
This list is obviously non-exhaustive. The point is I will not be lifting a finger for any of these causes. To radfem guilt tripping tactics like "the married normie woman that volunteers twice a week at a women's shelter is doing more for feminism than YOU", my only response is--Good, exactly as I intend.
#blackpill feminism
Be mindful of male PR and the limitations of your female perspective. You may genuinely be appalled by inequality, but he isn't. A sperm cell doesn't want sexual reproduction to cease, it just wants to get to the egg first. Males are designed for competition and rat racing, it's why they exist.
Any woke male is simply upset that he's not the top dog. Moids are not capable of truly despising hierarchies as a concept, they can only be resentful of their failure to thrive in them. Any 'theory' produced by them is simply an extended rationalization/PR.
Every mama's basement revolutionary wants to be the white capitalist republican pig Chad who gets to reproduce with white bitch Stacy. Because he secretly admires Chad yet desires Stacy, his anger will be reserved for Stacy whom he perceives as reserving her resources for a better male. She symbolizes the fact that he will never advance enough among other males to be selected by her.
In general, anger is a pretty good indicator of desire and deprivation in males. They always hate what they can't have, it's in their nature.
Since this place is full of screeching incels, I'm going to leave some FDS wisdom for the ladies: Always judge men by their physical appearance, regardless of the context.
You need to stop trying to divine a moid's niceness from his subjective level of femininity or masculinity. Femininity and masculinity are mystifications, they're not real. there are only femaleness (expensive gametes, internal gestation) and maleness (cheap gametes, needs a host to reproduce). the human male is a particularly vicious and highly specialized sexual endoparasite. that is his only directive and the core of his psyche - everything he thinks and feels, how he sees the world, is rooted in it. "abuser soft boys" shouldn't shock you any more than queer feminist girlcock rapists do, they're simply an adaptation to achieve the same end a bara roidpig or a right wing chud would pursue - infect your soma to 3d print more of his germline (or engage in other male typical/parasitic sexual behaviors even if they're areproductive).
This is another reason why nothing beyond looks and utility should ever be a consideration in female mate choice, and god help you if you sacrifice any of that for an assumption that you're getting a "gentle soul". the "good", "selfless" male personality you are envisioning biologically cannot occur in something that evolved to divert your body's resources from self-maintenance and other reproductive effort to providing for his offspring exclusively - in simple terms, cause you harm for his own self-perpetuation.
(Kujo Jotaro): Culture and Politics are predicated on dialogue, dialogue naturally implies reaction; TERFs aren't just roiling at petty grievances, they're attempting to reassert/maintain the hierarchy feminism established during the 20th century.
Troons, and to a lesser extent poons, threaten the very foundations of their movement. At the very edifice of Feminism is the implicitly expressed notion that Men are naturally depraved, and by contrast Women are naturally virtuous. The idea that one could essentially subvert their nature and gain some purchase in virtue upends their entire world view and angers them to no end. The idea that a disgusting moid could transform into a virtuous foid quite literally offends their deepest convictions about the world and how it operates.
(The Hardest R): It’s interesting that when asking TERFs what we should go towards, it’s always back to 2015 or so when campus rape hysterias were back on the menu and we were seeing shit like farting near a girl is rape, that “manspreading” should be illegal, etc. Basically they just want to go back to their zenith of power. Which is why I’ve never thought there was any value allying with TERFs. The peak of Pumpkin Spice feminism was fucking terrible and we are not going back to that shit.
> Just realised males are essentially defective females. There are no two sexes, there is only one and that is female. Males are just type 2 females, defective women. Whereas we are the original, complete female. Males are jealous and hate us because they didn't want to change into the defective female after the ninth week period but they did and so became what is known as male, "man" but really all they are is defective females. Then they try to trans themselves into the original complete woman, but it never works and they can never become her.
Looking at that Y chromosome it's seriously fucked up looking compared to the X chromosome which us ladies have two of, the X looks healthy and robust, complete. The Y looks like it's been irradiated lmao fucking retarded looking.
Defective type 2 women is all men are.
> It's because moids are quite literally missing genetic material, anon. Plainly speaking, they're less human than women. The Y also accumulates mutations at a faster rate, has fewer genes and can't self-repair. Think of it as an X that was born without a leg. Katawa chromosome.
This brings us to another common male meme - that women are somehow the "specialized" unit that exists solely for reproduction, while men can be anything. That is plainly false, first of all because it makes no sense for the less expendable sex to be more specialized. If all men die tomorrow, it will be an inconvenience, perhaps a crisis, mostly a sanitation one. If all women die tomorrow, it's certain extinction.
[ CONTEXT. Refering to the Polgar experiment: The training that László Polgár and his wife Klara carried out with their three daughters, Susan, Judit, and Sofia, to turn them into chess masters. Polgár believed that intelligence could be developed through education and intensive practice, rather than being innate.]
It's cute how moids mostly choose to omit the fact that they have more leisure time and are in general not expected to take on tedious caretaking tasks that permanently rewire you into a tantrum forecasting machine. They can freely choose to dedicate themselves solely to a craft of their choosing and sacrifice 0 reproductive opportunity. And yet with all that enormous investment, female maintenance staff on call 24/7, women endlessly tending to retarded male fee-fees throughout their lives - men's performance is still barely better and declining rapidly. I'm not even going to mention their enormous social cost in terms of crime and violence.
The moid raised brilliant daughters, but in order for that to happen he needed a female caretaker mule - a role millions of women are shoehorned into whether they choose to reproduce or not. If this experiment has proved anything it's that we do this for our sons, husbands and fathers every day to help them stay ahead of us. We readily acknowledge the human potential that gets wasted every day because of poverty and disease, but the absolute waste of brain cycles that is compulsory conditioning for caretaking is far, far worse.
TL;DR daily reminder that unless your moid is upgrading your life to a seemingly ridiculous degree, you are not winning by being in a relationship. Men get more out of heterosexual relations by default even if you don't bang him and do nothing around the house, because he's still your emotional parasite. Never listen to their whining about having to give you money, it's the very least they can do for quite literally giving you brain damage.
@dreamy_birdy207: Bullying a retarded man is funny for a while, but it gets boring after a while. xy scum even fails to be entertaining. Moids are truly lame and inferior 😒
@aur_z13537: You're not tough nor you're cool. You're literally just making yourself look like a repugnant cunt. Just when i think that you parasites couldn't get any more retarded, you find a way to surprise me. Useless gender, we need to go back to oppress you.
@dreamy_birdy207: Dude for real, you sound suicidal. Is everything alright? I know being a moid sucks because you are dumb and inferior and stuff, but you should get help. See? I even have compassion for xy trash. That proves that women are god-like.
@aur_z13537: Based on the way you write theres no way you're older than 14. You truly do sound like a repugnant and filthy highschool foid. Literally go do something useful in your life instead of being a repugnant parasite.Go back pissing blood, isn't that what you xx dogs do or sum? Yuck
@dreamy_birdy207: Are you pedophile or why are you obsessed with 14 years? Yes! Periods are also the only reason why dumb moids have mouthes, so that they can clean us off. That's only for attractive moids. But don't worry, you're too ugly anyway, nobody wants to be near your abhorrent face...
@aur_z13537: Corny as fuck and fucking retarded. Men are the dominant force of the world and females are parasites that contribute nothing other than being parasites. And men are realizing that, thats why numbers are so high. Its deserved, and long due. Xx stay losing
@dreamy_birdy207: Xy cancer deletes other xy cancer because even moids know that moids are superfluous and worthless.
@aur_z13537: Men delete and abuse the parasitic xx because its the only thing it fucking deserves. Natural selection, the strong beats the inferior. Just how it is, ya'll can massacred by a 12 year old boy.
@dreamy_birdy207: ya'll can massacred" I may not pay attention to spelling, but you are genuinely retarded, as you can't even form a proper, gramtically correct sentence I feel bad for bullying you, because it's not your fault that you are born inferior and worthless.
@aur_z13537: Can get*. My point still stands, and you're gasping at straws because its all your inferior femoid brain can come up with. You really seem to bring up the word"bullying"a lot, did you actually get bullied?Is everything ok? l mean that would explain why you're so fucking miserable
@dreamy_birdy207:I have alot of experience with bullying moids, that's why. I always aspire to be a good person by helping moids accept their inferior nature and auto-deleting. Do you need help too?
@aur_z13537: You're so fucking corny its hilarious you can be a good person and help not only men but the entire society by getting that good ol rope and putting it around your neck simply taking out the garbage, its THAT simple.
@dreamy_birdy207: If I was a moid, I would have definitely done that.
@aur_z13537: And yet you're a foid, nothings stopping you. Go right ahead bro and tf does gooning even means? Use actual words you stupid fucking 14 year old brat
(Anon 1): On the topic of male prisons, why do men like placing the blame on women for their own issues?
They
>Commit crimes
>Get sentenced by other men for the crimes they commit
>Go to prison with male guards who don't care when other men rape and abuse them
>And somehow all of this is women's fault and proof women have it super easy
Why?
(Anon 2): image
Because moids have evolved to externalize. It makes no sense for them to stop and self reflect, they're basically mindless cannon fodder that exists to reach the egg or die trying. You're approaching this like a woman - someone who evolved for caution, self-reflection, error monitoring and general self awareness (to make sure you survive for as long as possible, being more scarce and valuable in sexual reproduction). You also have the ability to have unconditional empathy for creatures that don't look like you, because this is what you need to raise infants. Understand that this is not what males exist for. By design, they actually require complete inability to see that anything could be wrong with their decisions in order to perform as nature intended. If a male hesitates and loses opportunity, he is genetically dead. From the male perspective this is tantamount to literal death. Therefore, being a pompous cretin yields better results than being a self aware human with sane levels of self doubt. Obviously more cerebral males exist, but they will always be a minority.
It's one of those obsolete directives that initially let us become the dominant species, kind of like extreme tribalism or being unable to resist high calorie foods. In a technological society, these behaviors are a liability.
https://x.com/cyberheathen88/status/1867966487639851410
@Sleek_999: A foid is a female, we call yall that because we don’t see yall as human
@Tunteiya1: Then why is your whole movement centered around women
@Sleek_999: We hate women because women hate us for something we can’t control (being ugly)
@pstain_: No we hate you for your personalities. Plenty of ugly men get women. Men that whine and cry and refuse to acknowledge our humanity? They get nothing because they're pathetic and repulsive. Hope this helps!
@cyberheathen88: don’t listen to the other woman. we indeed hate you for being ugly and subhuman moids. we do not love you because we consider you ugly and therefore, subhuman. we consider you undeserving of love and sex. we want to keep you lonely and miserable for the rest of your life.
Moids think they are the victim when they 6ually terrorize women. The solution is obvious: chemical castration so such "degeneracy" does not persist. But now it's a "violation of human rights" or something. It's like nyggers have no hobbies. I have read one nygger assert that having no libido would be like losing its "soul". Can you imagine being such a primal entity?
We should really explore mass castration. I totally understand the urge to electric drill their richards off, but let's be nice here. It would be more effective to slip all the nyggers in your life some tranny pills or prostate cancer medication. Moids will continue to be vile but everyone can agree that women would be safer if all moids had their libidos exterminated. Sounds more fun than committing a mass shooting. The best shooters only have around 50-70 casualties and average shooter can barely crack a double digit body count. You can have a greater impact if you chemically castrate thousands and observe the results. 50 human lives are meaningless in the grander scheme. They keep on excreting new units of human biomass every day.
I see gynarchism as a more long term result of separatism, i don't think they are neccesarily incompatible. Regardless, i think it is important to remember that moids represent a united front while women seem very divided, and this lack of class consciousness is a deliberate attempt at reducing women's organizational power. I suggest these tenants to help decouple this moid programming:
- A woman is always assumed to be correct against a moid, no exceptions. A moid is always assumed to be wrong unless proven otherwise, and even then one should always defer to another woman's opinion and be dismissive of men's opinions even if they are right.
- Men are both the enemy and inferior from birth, they exist to serve women and center women. Any man that doesn't center women 100% is to be insulted and shamed. Of course, it is impossible by definition for any moid to truly center women and so they should all be shamed regularly. Ways to center women are labor, attractiveness to women, and submission to women's opinions.
- Men are both ideologically inferior and dangerous, a beast that will attack if not properly trained, and one that should be discarded once it is not useful. Old useless moids need to die alone as the worthless things they are unless they provide labor and dutiful service to women.
- Moids cannot ever be trusted with power. Power belongs to women as they are proven to be better leaders. Any moid in power needs to be shamed into submission or abandonment until the upper echelons of society are occupied by women.
- Jobs and tasks for men should be physical, menial, constant and boring. They should always have work to do at all times to prevent them from misusing their undeveloped primate brains, and they should be given the most tedious and time consuming tasks. They should be at home at most times and shamed relentlessly if their work is not perfect. It will never be. Any monetary gain should be passed to women for managing, for they will use it on porn, alcohol and videogames.
- Women should only care about their pleasure in all situations and abandon any empathy for moids save for that which may be used for manipulation and gaslighting.
- Any threat to a woman must be taken very seriously and mob mentality here is vital. Threats to moids should be treated as a joke or secondary.
-@hollowearhterf:
image
-@cloneristic: Dworkin was such a filthy goonette. You wish fatty.
-@cyberheathen88: no, you repugnant gooner. if she truly wished for something so disgusting, she would starve herself and get fucked and fulfill her “wish”. moids are always salivating to impregnate women anyway, she wouldn’t even have to try.
-@cloneristic: (...) Being that ugly on the outside helps you be that ugly on the inside and whether or not anyone had to go there, she did. If you woke up in her body you'd become a sick fuck weaving delicious nightmares all day and night too. Just like the suspect physiognomy in the mirror reverse induces men to become sex creeps just because they look like one. When you become that much of a sloppy heap there is no normal joy to be milked from men anymore, only the perverse pleasure of imaging brutality, rape, and degradation at the heart of all things. (...) It's not our fault getting bound and bred is peak foidly performance. At least there's less responsibility in that, even if it's still better you than me.
-@cyberheathen88: 1) rage induced moid vomit. anyway, since you scrotes have your g spots located deep inside your shitholes, one can naturally conclude that you lower animals were biologically designed to receive anal. born to be bound and sodomized is peak moid sexuality. fucked on all fours. 2) your theory is only acceptable if you acknowledge that all moid philosophical thought is born of ugly men. look at the absolute state of this subhuman goblin and try to fuck it, let alone love it. its face and body are the source of its hatred for women.
image
-@cloneristic: (...) Men are supposed to be ugly. The beauty still wants to fuck the beast, most of all in fact. And it ain't no crime to get old. (...) If we're gross you're grosser for fucking us.
-@cyberheathen88: thanks for admitting that the entirety of moid behaviour can be condensed into one singular thought : “i am an ugly and subhuman XY with inferior gametes, so a woman that willingly chooses to be with me is even lesser than me” it’s the host vs parasite situation, where the parasite (moid) upon infesting the host (woman) now thinks itself to be superior (probably)
> Fags stole all their "culture" from women and act as if they're angels that women should worship because they're not attracted to us so therefore they supposedly have no motivations to chain us as if that is the only existing factor and form of being shitty to women. Plenty of fags sexually assault women because it's not about attraction, it's about power.
They get off to being like women but still better (looking at those retards who call themselves "femboys") because they're the dominant sex. It's just plain ol' misogyny. I saw a reel about this and was shocked to see a lot of normie zoomer girls waking up to this and hating how gay moids treat them.
Also, I genuinely don't get why the ones in first world countries act so oppressed. Apart from probably getting called names here and there, what do they even suffer from at this point? You're reaching 40 and own 4 rental properties with your husband, Benjamin. You get invited to the cookout every Sunday with dozens of people including all your faghag friends.
Not to mention how they treat lesbians, that's a whole new can of worms.
> I feel like most women here (and especially radfem leaning users) are already faggotpilled though. I think the only women caping for fags are libfems, just like they cape for trannies (the final boss of faggotry, in a sense).
femmefascist: all moids are boring, ugly, subhuman, disgusting, evil, untalented, psychotic, arrogant, selfish, useless, stupid, loud, obnoxious, and their existence is detrimental to humanity
they shouldn't have the right to vote. they shouldn't be allowed to work. they shouldn't even be allowed in any public place. men need to die
---
kawaiigardenerwolf: I think men should work. They can work in coal mines and factories but they shouldn't get paid, their salaries should become reparations for all the women who were enslaved under men for thousands of years.
But yes, they shouldn't be allowed to speak to one another, gather in groups, hold positions of power, or work with women.
I think it's only fair to subjugate men as second class citizens for the next 10k years.
Moid explaining why therapy is totally useless for men.
I find it hilarious how men will admit shit about their own sex what would get a woman called an extreme hateful misandrist if we said the same thing.
I can't count how many times I've said male depression isn't real and that the worst psychological torment most males are capable of experiencing is lack of pussy. Somehow this guy is allowed to say it but I'm not.
Of course I despise giving sx to moids, but every based woman should be wary of the political implications of slt-shaming. Sl*t = unclaimed woman.
The intent is to make our human rights inextricable from xy control. As long as a woman's dignity is based on how many bussies have accessed her, society does not make a distinction whether it is consensual or not. An xy can ruin a woman's life by touching her.
When that happens, it means that we don't have a socially dominant father, brother, husband, etc. to prevent it from happening. The logical consequence is that no woman's human rights are guaranteed, unless she gains the favor of a dominant y-chromot*rd. And even when she is fortunate enough to be in good standing with one, it may very soon dissipate the moment she is touched by any xy. The moment when that happens, other xys sense blood in the water and realize that she is free game.
(...)
It doesn't matter if we are literally not like the other girls. That's not the point. xys would victimize any female perceived as vulnerable. The core of all forms of oppression is that we are not judged primarily based on our moral character, which is the only way it should be. It means other things fall into the equation of whether we receive moral behavior or not. And as long as that happens, we cannot associate with other people affected by said phenomenon on the basis of morality, but mutual interest in preventing our shared trait from impacting our human rights. No matter how despicable they are.
So I am repulsed by prostitutes and the like, but it is androcentric to pretend that a "good girl" is any different. A "good girl" produces the illusion that we can be seen as people if we submit to nyggers and abuse subversive women. It is only politically logical to show the world what "good girls" are: Single-john prostitutes.
Marriage = prostitution. There is no hope in acceding to xy control. Better than seething on the internet about "sl*ts", which only serves xy interests even if dumber xys don't realize. I don't care how mean BPF Twitter gets, my concern is that you don't post IRL. If I ever got arrested for all the crimes I've committed, I'd be looking at decades.
all men deserve to be r*ped (by other men, that is. they enjoy when women ‘rape’ them), to finally feel how it is to be truly desecrated in the way that they constantly desecrate us. but then again, i think even “consensual sex” between a moid and a woman is some form of rape. the way they have sex with us is like they're using us as human fleshlights. complete disregard for our pleasure and thus, our humanity.
The biggest blackpill is actually having a loving father, brother, boyfriend, etc. Because then you see the ultimate expression of male benevolence, and how it remains a moral failure. Male love is generally patronizing. And even then, you see how it values you only because you are genetically related or going to produce more genetic relations, and contrast that with how it perceives any other random woman on the planet. It only sees you as respectable because you're NLOG. Not like those other girls that they feel entitled to exploit. Male love is always based on NLOG which is why female self-esteem also generally centered around that principle. There is the idea that if you're prettier or more competent you might escape the fate of field/street slaves.
Linkola was maybe right when he supposed that nyggers were stupid rather than evil. I don't even believe that every single nygger is an agent of inexplicable, unfathomable cruelty. Some moids relish the idea that they are regarded as a force that can't be reasoned with, and therefore cannot be contained, by radical feminists. Sorry moids, you're not that relevant. Evil is the domain of women. y-chromot*rds are just animals, some kind of natural phenomenon beyond abstract concepts of ethics.
As for the males who are different, I believe they can exist but there is nothing I am going to do about it. The reasonable radical feminist stance would be to acknowledge that it's not that all rape apes are evil but none of them can help us in the end, nor should we expect them to. It's like you want them all to be inhumanly evil as a prerequisite for engaging in the female power process. Almost as if any of them were to have your interests at heart, you would drop your sword and kiss and make up. Because you don't actually want to be an autonomous agent. You just want rape apes to be nice to you. If a male was somehow miraculously Not Like Other Males, there's really nothing I can do to help them and it doesn't change what I know about the world.
So, I was thinking, and realistically, men are essentially AIs. They exist, but they're not all there in the human ways that we are, quite clearly. I realized morality for a man only functions on a cost-benefit basis, and that's why when they're alone with you, it is literally a life-or-death situation sometimes if it benefits them enough. They aren't focused on self-improvement, just petty displays of power that try to fill in the void of whatever is supposed to exist inside them. I have yet to meet a moid who I truly connected with, on an intellectual and emotional level.
These people literally have no souls, and just exist in some permanently deranged caveman state. Idk, if we can talk about the AI apocalypse, why can't we talk about the moid apocalypse that hit us several hundred million years ago? Planet Earth has literally been under siege by some parasitic, malformed lifeforms for eons, that have constantly raped, tortured, mutilated, and killed women over petty things. They serve a redundant purpose, that we already have the biological machinery to complete on our own. Its always been about us, and moids just serve as mindless, biological update systems I guess you could say (continually introducing new genes to us over the generations).
They're literally just evolutionary acceleration agents. They only exist because asexual creatures didn't evolve as fast as this newly created breeding cycle, and I think maybe we should look into allowing women to simply, idk, genetically modify their clones over the generations. It'd be way more controlled, we'd actually be cautious and calculating about what traits we gave our kids, and we could outmode the role of moids, once again, in reproduction.
Maybe if we can draw the line at AIs, we should consider removing moids as well.
1.) Men are not attracted to women.
Men constantly talk about how disgusting vaginas look, smell, taste, and how much they hate the idea of going down on women. If they have the choice, they prefer female genitals that are mutilated: either via “old-fashioned” techniques like in some African and Islamic communities or via “modern” cosmetic surgeries that some women in porn have performed on them. The goal of this is always a kind of sexless, “genitalless”, pedophilic look of a pink little slit.
Men want babies with big tits.
And what do they want to sexually do to these babies with big tits? Fuck them in the ass, fuck them in the throat, beat, rape, torture, and humiliate them until they cry.
Men are not attracted to actual female bodies. Men only enjoy the idea of DESTROYING female bodies: both through absurd beauty norms that effectively destroy these bodies and turn them into absurd dolls and through sexual practices that are always about hurting, beating, whipping, raping, anal fucking, throat fucking female bodies.
Men are MONSTERS. There is some creepy shit in nature: viruses and predators and parasite larvae that eat their host alive. And, of course, other animals also rape women. But nothing is as cruel and disgusting as the human moid: at least a lion doesn’t masturbate over the idea of a female lion being torn to pieces by an elephant or whatever. A predator just wants to eat you, a coronavirus just enter a cell nucleus and replicate … but the human moid gets erections and masturbates to the thought of women being humiliated and tortured and hurt until they cry and bleed or even die.
Yes that's the only way to fully separate from men. The first r*pe ape that you will most likely be next to you is your own father. He is your first authorative figure, the first subhuman that will introduce the patriarchy to you. I have talked to many radfem and even so called misandrist online that says they hate men but still love their Fathers.
First of all every c*m dispenser is a father or soon-to-be father. When you start giving allowance to your own father, what makes you think every women won't? How to truly liberate ourselves when you still validate and subhuman ape as a human being simply because you are his daughter?
Secondly, he might "love" you and care about you but he treated other women that are not part of his family. So why then are you such cucks to your own father?
Thirdly, your father does not care nor love you. An inferior species is devoid of anything called love or affection. You are just projecting your humanity onto your father because you are conditioned since birth that this man is a parent, protector, carer, etc. A male cannot love you. He sees you differently compared to other women because you carry his seed inside of you. He is willing to protect and care for his seed because he is simply turn on by the fact that his seed passes on from offspring to offspring. You are just an extension of his ego and nothing else. When he "loves" you, he just loves the part of himself inside you till the day you die. A moid can never truly love a woman, only himself. Some moids take it to the extreme and see you as their mother when you hit a certain age then they want to r*pe you. Some can't wait for that age and r*pe you when you're young.
We should all be hating our own fathers. He is the first moid we should be hating before we hate any other man. Sure he might not be raping you, abusing you, etc but can you really say the same a 100 years ago? 100 years ago your own father would sold you to another man to be r*pe and have r*pe offsprings. He's only good now cause moids need to pretend to be good in this day and age to get away with far more insidious stuff.
I was looking into "his"tory and it seems like there's an ongoing pattern. Throughout the ages women frquently slipped through the cracks by the rare non insecure frontpole that didn't burn his daughter at the stake for reading and writing. She would pass her wisdom down through the ages. In 1100 some woman who managed to escape a life of moid servitude by dedicating her life to God, then got divine visions basically saying that moids are retarded.
The more women gained literacy and learned about the world, the faster she excelled at it. Without moid suppression women evolve at a rate so rapid it goes beyond the limited and pathetic comprehension of our lesser, X chromosome deficient sex. The second we can go back to having a wise female elder ruling over the males is the moment we as a species finally realize our unique gift of sapience.
It still boggles my mind that these sperm sacks will try to boast about how males are stronger than females as if that's worth shit. The reality is that humans, devoid of tools, are some of the weakest of the great apes when pitted up against any other animal known for it's raw power. A man will never defeat a brown bear or gorilla in hand to hand combat. Without his mind, he would be picked off like the lions pick off baboons in the African savanna.
