[From “Alcoholism is a Hoax, You Gay Retard”]
Ever since I explicated, as part of the Illness Revelations, that alcoholism is a valid and perfectly healthy lifestyle decision, I’ve gotten messages falsely claiming that this information is inaccurate. In fact, it is completely accurate, but probably, the language needs clarification[…]
“Alcoholism” is a hoax created by Alcoholics Anonymous. “Addiction,” as a general matter, is a baseless fraud invented by ninnying women and embraced by the psychiatric industry as an extremely profitable swindle[…]
These people claim that “addiction is a disease,” which is an utterly nonsensical statement on its face. What is a “behavioral disease”?[…]
There are people who drink too much, and end up behaving badly. However, here’s the thing: all of these people have serious personal problems that do not involve alcohol[…]
Following the above explanation of how people drink too much because they have personal problems, people use drugs for this same purpose[…]
In terms of the “addiction” element – even for the hardest drugs of all, detox/withdrawal takes one week (don’t argue with me that it could be up to two weeks – average is one week)[…]You feel like shit, sleep a lot, have diarrhea. For a week. Everyone can do that. It’s very easy. That is not “addiction.” It’s detox[…]
I am a staunch defender of Adolf Hitler, and also the most prominent Putin shill in the English language. That might seem counterintuitive, but it’s really, really not. Hitler was against Slavs, but that is a complicated thing, which had a lot to do with hundreds of years of history, and then the Bolshevik Revolution (Hitler was aggressively anti-communist, obviously). I wish there would have been a deal between Hitler and Stalin, because Stalin was no Lenin, but that didn’t happen[…]There is a quote from Hitler where he says “the Russian concept of civilization is whatever keeps the vodka flowing”[…]
“Drunk driving” laws absolutely are communism
20 comments
This made me imagine a zombie movie about someone who dies while drunk but somehow coming back as a “Drunk Zombie”.
The DZ has to keep itself under the influence of alcohol to avoid going from undead back to dead. And anyone it bites or scratches dies after a while, reviving as new DZs, doing things like raiding liquor stores.
It reminds me of the old line that the difference between drunks and alcoholics, is that we drunks don't go to meetings. But even old pub jokes don't seem funny with Anglin around. Some people can have a drink occasionally, then no problem, others are addicted and could ruin their lives if they have another drink. To suggest otherwise shows what an insensitive arsehole he is.
I am a staunch defender of Adolf Hitler, and also the most prominent Putin shill in the English language. That might seem counterintuitive, but it’s really, really not.
Indeed. Because, above all else - be it racism, fascism, homophobia or even misogyny -, you are a nihilistic edgelord psychopath who ultimately just wants to see the world burn.
I wish there would have been a deal between Hitler and Stalin, because Stalin was no Lenin, but that didn’t happen
But there was such an agreement: the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, aka the German-Soviet Treaty of Nonaggression, the Nazi-Soviet Nonaggression Pact and the Hitler-Stalin Pact . It was signed August 23, 1939.
Hitler violated that pact less than 2 years later when he launched an invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. The result was a two-front war for Germany that guaranteed Nazi defeat.
“ “Drunk driving” laws absolutely are communism”
Um, communism is based on ‘from each according to their ability.’ Driving Under The Influence laws are based on a generalized inability. Like, the complete opposite. You continue to use and abuse words that you don’t understand.
“withdrawal takes one week (don’t argue with me”
I’ve been on submarine deployments with alcoholics. It take two weeks. That’s from last night of liberty before the sub dives to when their body throws off the last of the toxins. They go pretty schizo for a while, there. Your knowledge about a condition you deny is not terribly instructive.
And when we pull back in and alcohol is available, they go right back to their habits. I know three guys that got out and drank themselves to death without their regular detox of deployment.
But aside from that, even if we accept that addiction isn’t real, drunk driving is not a plot. It took a HORRENDOUS amount of time, and deaths, to get those laws. The nation loved a man who could ‘hold his liquor,’ and drive. We celebrated the stories of ‘woke up in a different state, married to a horse’ and ‘Son, why is the car parked at an odd angle… Across the street… On the neighbor’s porch?’ Stories abounded and people reacted to the suggestion that maybe they shouldn’t drive drunk the way some people reacted to ‘maybe wear a mask ifyou’re shopping.’
Also, a lot of defenses started with ‘my dad could kill a fifth and make it all the way from Goose Hollow to our home in Buhl. Usually with a beer in his hand. And he never killed nobody.’
It was a direct attack on basic masculinity, taking that breathalyzer test.
And the sheer fact that those laws DO exist is a testament to the reality and extent of the problem.
It’s not ‘drinking is bad because we say so,’ it’s ‘We say drunk driving is bad because that’s the only conclusion to draw from the following statistics.’
But how can debunking your falsehoods be "falsely claiming" that your nonsense is false? So as usual, if you're demonstrated to be wrong, it means that everything else must really be and that all the evidence against your arguments must also be denied. Reality denial...
Alcoholics Anonymous was founded in 1935. The Prohibition was 1920-1933. I'm just gonna leave that there.
But, the reason they call addiction a disease isn't because it literally is a disease, but because the effects it has and treatment can be similar to how one handles an actual disease. And in the case of substance abuse, the effects are often very physical and will ravage the body like a disease would.
As an aside, limited mental faculties from alcohol abuse and rage at a constant whiskey dick would explain a lot of Andrew's behavior...
Ever seen a case of delirium tremens? It's a lot more life-threatening than "You feel like shit, sleep a lot, have diarrhea. For a week." If it's severe enough, it can kill you.
alcoholism is a valid and perfectly healthy lifestyle decision,
“Perfectly healthy” my ass!! Do I really need to go into detail about the very well-documented bad effects excessive alcohol use has on people? I thought that was pretty much common knowledge. My cousin’s dad (who I barely even remember, he broke up with my aunt when I was pretty young) basically spent the last few years of his life with “alcohol related dementia.” And that’s not even going into the effects it has on the body.
“Alcoholism” is a hoax created by Alcoholics Anonymous.
As a guy who’s actually BEEN to AA meetings, I totally have issues with them. For one thing, it’s a borderline cult. Or at the very least, rooted in religion. People will TRY to say it’s not, but yeah it is. Still, though….that statement is just pure BS.
Also, I have to wonder, what exactly are Andrew’s qualifications to make such statements? Why should we believe what he says over years and years of established knowledge on such matters? Well, let’s see….from the Wikipedia article on him :
After high school, Anglin took classes at Columbus State Community College in 2003, and studied English at Ohio State University for one semester in 2004.
Oh, hmm…
@Skyknight #179900
Well, this is his origin story - take note that he was a misogynist and a psychopath even when he was a left-wing highschool vegan.
I would say the world’s mapital crime is not treating Andrew Anglin as the god he sees himself as.
@Sasha #179905
Let’s not forget Korsakoff syndrome.
@Bastethotep #179910
There’s a paywall, but I already get the impression from your own words that like Horowitz and McConnell in their own earlier careers, he was virtue signaling to be exalted. (Rightward projection as ever…) Even if to me, even divinity doesn’t also mean one immediately deserves obsequiousness. In terms of your choice of words, what makes a god a god? A theos, anunnaki, kami, and teotl don’t strike me as quite so similar to each other, after all.
Some… thing was teetotal: it died in a hole in the ground. Some… thing else is teetotal. The way things are going, if it continues to flap its yap at more than just court staff, then other staff later will ensure it ends up in the Hole. As John Wayne said:
Never trust a man who doesn’t drink
Even Joe Biden takes wine at Communion.
And he’s more Catholic than that which claims to be as ‘trad’ as Nick ‘Catboi’ Fuentes.
The Duke speaks more sense than you ever will, Andiepoos: and he’s dead.
But unlike his legacy you’ll just die an irrelevance.
As Biden would say - even though that’s the only time he does - ‘Take a little wine for thy stomach’s sake’
Your psychological infirmities are often , OP.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.