You know what, fine. Let’s for a moment assume that an undeveloped, not-yet-conscious fetus is considered “alive” by your definitions (despite the fact that it cannot live independently in any way). You still have NOT explained why said fetus’ existence is infinitely more valuable than that of its unwilling host body (aka the mother). If said parasite (again, the fetus that cannot live independently) endangers the host body, then why does the host body HAVE die alongside said parasite if it’s perfectly possible to excise said parasite to save the host body!?
You “pro lifers’” logic simply does NOT make any sense even by your own inane standards!! You literally would rather have two people die with certainty than kill one to potentially save the other!!
Seriously, you jerks seem more like Nurgle in that regard! You know, the Chaos God of Despair, Decay, and Pestilence who thinks a single bacterium is equally “alive” to a human being; thus he considers it more acceptable to let one human die a slow and agnozing death to let millions of bacteria live than kill thousands of bacteria to save one human… In other words, YOU ARE EVIL AND DERANGED!!!!