www.disqus.com

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

Roger Marks:
George Nathanson, one of America's foremost abortionist who has now passed on, said in a TV interview that EVERY abortion kills a baby. What do you know that he didn't?

Canis Vulpes:
I know terminology. Every abortion terminates a fetus. You want to use the emotionally-charged language to try to artificially win people over to your side, go ahead.

Roger Marks:
I have 11 grandchildren. Everyone is called a baby. Not one of them is called a fetus. When I say to anyine them "how is my little baby" they don't gasp for air because I am being emotionally charged. They come and hug me and sit on my lap. No fear their.
As you obviously have a problem with reading I will say it again. George Nathanson said, not me, every abortion kills a BABY.

Show post

pastoredsmith #fundie disqus.com

pastoredsmith:
There is nothing in atheism except denial. Denial, when it comes to refuting the truth about God, is a religion. You worship your own logic. And, my congregation is doing well. Perhaps you should join us. God will change your miserable, imaginary life into one of purpose.

bumsmcgee:
They are not that different than you. They just add one more God they don’t believe in to the list you yourself use. Your threats are just your own paranoid revenge fantasy. You can’t handle being disagreed with.

pastoredsmith:
You don't know me, yet you continue your fake insults. Typical of an atheist who knows he can't win the argument using his own logic. Don't know who said it, but they are right...... "
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers." Had to be an atheist that said that.

bumsmcgee:
Yeah, it’s always the atheists people like you give the blame to. Anyway what I said is true. I just disbelieve one more God than you do.

pastoredsmith:
"people like you give blame to..." No, that is not true. "Blame" is not "given" it comes from actions. FFRF, the bullies you represent, are the people who are trying to stifle all voices but those who line up with them. It is atheists who want to rewrite textbooks and omit the obvious Christian influence on the formation of the USA and all the good that is being done. I've never seen an atheist hospital nor an atheist food pantry. How about an atheist version of the Salvation Army that feeds and clothes the needy. None exist. The absence of God in a life is equal to the absence of true, genuine love; for only in God can that kind of love be found. I don't hate you, although you certainly have insinuated the opposite of that here. To tell the truth is not to hate, it is to set the record straight. I pray you find your way home from your atheism before it is too late for you.

bumsmcgee:
You're just reinforcing my point. Atheism is an opinion and that's all it is. We don't form clubs and organizations, except in cases where religion oversteps its boundaries. And I know of Christians who side with groups like the FFRF on occasion because your side DOES occasionally champion political causes they have no business being involved with. If no one is there to keep your side in line, you'll get away with murder.

pastoredsmith:
Wrong. Your point is that atheists think they can command the government. You think that by sending a threatening letter to a school, you can prevent a Christian teacher from laying a Bible on her desk. You think that you can silence Christians in the public arena, but you will never accomplish that. You think that you have authority over Christians in matters of free speech, but you don't. And, it is NOT atheists job to "Keep your side in line." You are not the gods you claim to disbelieve. And, I can always tell when an atheist has lost an argument. The slander comes forth. Murder? You don't believe in the 10 Commandments, if you truly don't believe in God, then you don't believe in the Bible. So, it is not I who commits that which I believe is wrong.

bumsmcgee:
You are WRONG

Atheists have no desire to command or control the government. The point is, they strongly desire that faith-minded people like YOU don't either. You are convinced you have the TRUTH but all you have is faith, and many reasonable people disagree with the heavy-handed things you try to hammer through. People like you believe abortion is murder when it is NOT, not by the definition of the dictionary nor the definition of the law. If you had your way, people would be thrown in jail for not worshipping your holy book and homosexuals would be jailed or worse. We have the right and the desire to be protected from people like you.

pastoredsmith:
No, I am RIGHT. Atheists DO want to control and command the government. Atheists ARE trying to silence Christians. I notice that you don't focus your efforts on Muslims. Only Christians. And, I have the truth....faith in the truth is easy. All you have is faith in the vein babblings of man's wild imagination. You have no basis for morality, as you think one thing and the next guy something, so there is no base line to build on....like a building with no foundation. And, you add much to what I am as opposed to the monster you make me out to be. I believe in freedom for all; including atheists, homosexuals and the like. No, I never advocated anyone be thrown in jail for their beliefs. And, the "protection" you seek from "people like you" is exactly my point. You don't want protection any more than gays "only wanted to get married." you want to fundamentally change society to jail "people like me" who dare express the truth. All this and you still hide behind a "handle." You are a coward, stenching the world from behind your private little curtain. "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain..." he is only a babbling atheist. If you wish to discuss, fine, But, stop the insults. I'll talk with you, but you won't slander me further.

bumsmcgee:
We have seen pastors calling for the execution of gay people. For that reason and that reason alone we need to be protected from the likes of you. You want your faith-based beliefs to be laws. You want a woman's right to choose to be taken away, and this is strictly based on your faith. You are RELIGION, we should have the right to say NO to you and we need to be protected from you.

pastoredsmith:
You have seen confused individuals who call themselves "pastors" calling for execution because someone is gay. Why do you care anyway? Are you gay? A woman's right to choose? What about the BABY's rights? After all, you say you are a person of science who hides behind that mask, right? So, if a whale fetus is a baby whale, what makes you think a fetus is not a human baby? From conception? You are no scientist. You are a hypocrite. And, I am NOT "religion." Religion does kill. Ask any Muslim who'd love to chop off your head because you are an atheist. People are very much imperfect; even and maybe especially some who call themselves "Christians." Can you testify to the good moral character of all atheists? No, you can't. No, you don't need protection from me. That's not what you seek. You seek silence of Christians; the very people who are doing good in this culture. Silence the hospitals and food pantry's and the clothing banks and all the good things that we (I) am involved with. You have lumped us in with radical religion because there is a fringe who are idiots, such as the "church" in Topeka that boycotts military funerals. These people are not Christians and hide behind the wall of lies they put up that is painted to look Christian. Sir, you need protection from someone, I'll agree. That someone is yourself. Your own twisted mind causes you to conjure up lies about me because you *think* I'm guilty of them. You couldn't be more wrong.

bumsmcgee:
What do you mean, "why do you care anyway?" Some religious lunatic decides that all gay people should be put to death, and wants to see the government enact such craziness? There are stats that say 1 in 10 people are LGBT. I care VERY MUCH that a guy calling himself a Christian Pastor would like to have the power to basically call for genocide. And this is something you defend?

The fact you're calling a fetus/zygote/embryo a "baby" tells me you're not being entirely reasonable. Of course I don't see abortion as something that is good. The thing is, most of the women put in that agonizing position don't either. But you don't look at individual situations AT ALL. You just say it's murder (it's not) and that's that. And once again, you want the government to enforce it. Yet another very good reason why the FFRF exists and why we have the right to be protected from people like you.

If the two examples above are the "good moral character" you insist Christians have, and criticize atheists for not having, I think can I safely rest my case. People like you scare the living daylights out of me.

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

(commenting on story “Mothers Reveal Pressure to Abort Babies with Down Syndrome”)

Another example of the hateful and appalling attitude of the baby killers who do not give a damn about the rights of the child. As long as they can force their ideology onto as many parents as possible and have as many babies as possible put in the hands of a paid assassin, who cares.

Children are NEVER the problem. The problem are the parents who refuse to accept that they are bringing a new life into the world that deserves the best possible start to their lives.

Not put into the hands of some butcher who will hack them to pieces because they are inconvenient or not perfect.

Abortion is gruesome and heartless and the biggest form of cruelty mankind has ever perpetrated on innocent children. The holocaust pales into insignificant in comparison to the millions of babies slaughtered at the altar of convenience. We jump up and down if someone harms an animal, yet we give our approval to killing a baby.

There is only one word to describe that and it is S-I-C-K.

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

Well, the government has finally discovered the truth. That a child does best when they are raised by a mum and dad.

What we need now is for some enterprising organisation to bring a case against the HHS on the basis that not putting a child with a mum and dad is discrimination for the child and consigning them to a second class existence.

I have been told that there are 3,000 pieces of research that backs the mum and dad scenario so if the HHS has doubts they do not need to have any.

The only thing that would stop you winning such a case is ideology. That homosexuals must not be discriminated against in any way even if it is bad for the children concerned. In other words, the wants of homosexuals override the needs of all others.

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

Roger Marks:
What world do you live in? Take a look at the internet and you will discover that homosexual porn is 90% anal.

Justus Jonas:
What percentage of gay male porn did you expect to be vaginal in nature, Roger? I'm curious.
Likewise I think you'd be very surprised to find that lesbian pornography is about 0% anal.
A tip, Roger. Don't talk about things you don't understand.

Show post

Brian Matthews #fundie disqus.com

God's moral code is the only one I honor. Not yours.

It's the only one you will be judged by.

Right and wrong isn't subjective. It's objective. And, I don't "decry" coercive force to enforce laws based on God's moral standards. Why would I?

Tell me, how would it hurt you if gay marriage was illegal, AGAIN, like it was only 4 years ago? How would it hurt you if LGBT was outlawed AGAIN, like when I was young?

There was order back then. Now it's virtual anarchy.

As I said, the founding generation outlawed these things, and they were outlawed in the US for around 200 years without any problems. Then people like you came along and opened Pandora's box. And the evil just keeps on coming with no chance of putting it back in that box.

Why are you defending evil?

Show post

Brian Matthews #fundie disqus.com

Brian Matthews:
What are you talking about?
You just posted another random bible verse out of context, and irrelevant to the conversation. You can't just abuse the scriptures like that. You can't just throw random Bible verses at your opponents when the verses don't even have anything to do with what you're talking about.
I've tried to be kind, but if you do it again, I will block you.

Canis Vulpes:
So block him then. I don't know why you think everyone's interested in your drama.

Show post

NIGELTEAPOT #fundie disqus.com

NIGELTEAPOT:
the devil marches to The Throne of God and uses you (yes, you) as a specific example to claim humanity should have never been created. this is what you have reduced yourself to.
Strange considering your every action scream textbook possession. perfect possession, I would guess. you aren't so much controlled as you are so evil that your desires are united with that of the demons.
both st*lin and h*tler were that way. If only we could be free of your evil as well.
your eyes WILL be Permanently opened, or they WILL be Permanently closed.

jacksays:
Wow - someone needs a hug.

Show post

Narnia4Ever #fundie disqus.com

Seriously, like, you don't even have to go to theology school to get a ordination? Wow....so legit. I'm definitely going to believe in your religion because I find it so plausible. A spaghetti monster sounds so holy and so worthy of being worshipped!
(no, sorry, that was sarcasm) And you say that Christians are the bullies? I'm scrolling down these comments and seeing all the rude stuff you Pasta-what-evers are saying about other people. What happened to 'all are welcome on his list' or whatever? Tons of Pasta-what-evers using horrible words like F***K and S***T. What kind of look does that give your religion? Why would I want to join your religion if you're just going to be saying all kinds of nasty things about other people? I feel really hurt that a people who seem to take their religion very seriously would act very rude towards people who aren't one of their own.

Show post

Brian Matthews #fundie disqus.com

Attention resident perverts. I will no longer be responding to you if you respond to one of my posts. I'll just block you.
I AM FED UP!!!
I am convinced, that you are beyond hope, and God forsaken. I've tried, but I'm just getting angrier, and angrier from years of trying to warn, and reason with you. From reading your insanity, and filth. I'm done!
You wicked people support this mutilation of a precious, innocent child, and I no longer care what happens to you. I'm sick of you!
I will continue to post comments opposing this filth. Comments sure to drive you crazy, but I will just ignore your temper tantrums, and block you.
I've warned hundreds of you people over the years the best I could. If you insist on going to Hell, HAVE AT IT!

Show post

NIGELTEAPOT #fundie disqus.com

NIGELTEAPOT:
Notice how my posts consist almost entirely of definitions. That should let you in yo fact you don't know a single thing of the topic you are speaking on, and I am frantically trying to inform you so you can speak the same language like a Human being.
Beast of h*ll, do you not notice the little traps I leave in my messages for you? Of course not, that would require you to read them at all (though I know you cannot understand then even if you did).
Like when I point out that you will ignore what I say to just reply to what you wish I said. this is the textbook gnosticism in which your "atheism" is a slavish offshoot of.
reprobate means you have been given over to sin, and therefore marked.
monster describes your evil.
fa*cism and communism are both marxism and based in the delusion of "socialism."
once the gulags were closed down, they repurposed the serbsky institute into a political prison. therefore to mark people for execution, you called them insane.
back before the serbsky institute, calling people "f*scist" and "n*zi" was the term to mark people for execution.
Not only are you a milquetoast suburban whiteboy h*ll-begging beast of h*ll, you are now using TWO separate soviet execution accusations from two generations of evil.
you're afraid, you should be. you will be.

bumsmcgee:
I'm finished talking to you now. Go see a nice doctor who will help you, and take his advice.

NIGELTEAPOT:
you are not finished talking to me, your kind believes attacking Christians makes your shame over sin go away. you are trying to psych yourself up to try to Martyr me.
I enflame your shame over sin, which means you want to attack more. you are even trying to mark me of execution in the soviet style right here.

Show post

NellieIrene #fundie #homophobia disqus.com

I don't know any Christians who deny service to homosexuals. I have heard of homosexuals who have sued Christian small business owners for refusing to use their labor for certain events that go against their religious conscience. An enumerated right that is expllcitly found in the 1st and 13th amendments of the American Constitution. Homosexuals are not facing Jim Crow level "discrimination". All they have to do is go down the street to get their event taken care of by the 99 percent of the other businesses who will willingly provide their labor. If the homosexual cries victim loud enough, they will undoubtedly get the service for free.

Forced conversion therapy has gone the way of forced lobotomies. If homosexuals don't want this type of therapy, then don't get it. Nobody cares. But like most things to LGBT&Qers that's just not good enough. They and their leftist masters are constantly pushing for legislation to ban any therapies for grown men and women with unwanted same sex attractions, or for parents with children who have unwanted sexual attractions. Leftists and LGBT&Qers get to decide the issue for EVERYBODY.

If anyone lives a loveless life the fault is entirely their own. Love, happiness, contentment. None of these things come from without. They come from within.

The LGBT&Qers quest for tolerance has made them the most freedom hating, intolerant, discriminatory bigots of all.

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

One. When you say you know a ton of christians, how many is that?
Two. I contribute to many different forums especially those christian forums where homosexuals come on them to attack christian and their beliefs.
Three. I have been on homosexual forums and told them the truth that they disagreed with and got banned in the first week.
Four. Even though they are christian forums the homosexuals always want the last word.
Five. You are not going to hell because someone said something. You and I mean everyone that is going to hell is due to the fact that you do not believe what God said.
Six. You don't need sex to fall in love. I fell in love with my wife and then had sex once we were married.
Seven. If homosexuality is a wonderful life as I have been told umpteen times, why is it that these homosexuals you refer to are poor, sad and lonely. People who have a wonderful life are not poor, sad or lonely.
Eight. What is SICK, is your inability to face the facts. In Sweden, approximately 2% of the population is homosexual. When same sex marriage was legalised, only 2% of those 2% got married. If homosexuals were looking for that someone special to love, how come only 2% of them acted on it?
Nine. What Jesus wants us to do is to oppose sin in all its shapes and forms.
Ten. The people that get upset are usually those who cannot handle the truth.
Eleven. If you do not approve of one night stands, then you do not approve of the activity of 90% of homosexuals as that is the modus operandi of nearly all of them.
Twelve. If they want to just live peaceable lives, why is it then that per head of population there is more violence amongs homosexuals than heterosexuals.
Thirteen. And you have the wackiest sense of what truth is. A case of the gospel according to me. One mans conflict is another man's truth. As Jack Nicholson said in a Few Good Men "That is the truth and you can't handle it."

Show post

Lydia Church #fundie disqus.com

Nothing justifies gay 'marriage' since God condemns it. (And Jesus, since He is God.)

Leviticus 18; 22
Leviticus 20; 13
Deuteronomy 22; 5
Romans 1; 26-27
1 Corinthians 6; 9-11
1 Timothy 1; 10

Homosexuality is a sin.
There is no marriage between them.
There is no transgenderism.
God didn't 'make' anyone gay.
There are only two genders.
The fall of man lead to the sin nature.
God made us male or female and we are our birth gender.

Singing any song does not alter the facts.
That song has absolutely NOTHING to do with this issue.

God loved the whole world, so He sent HIS SON to die for
our sins to save us, not just from the stain of sin, but the
power of sin over our lives, including the sin of homosexuality,
so that we could be saved from that lifestyle and the sin
of homosexuality will no longer have power over us!
We will be heterosexual, as God intended!
Hallelujah!
John 3; 16

Show post

♥LadyInChrist♥InGodITrust♥ #fundie disqus.com

Dear Heather Clark/Christian News Network,I can no longer post on this site.Trolls have taken over this site. It is no longer a site where Christians can post in peace.They hate us, No matter what we say they down vote us.They have done everything they could to stop me from posting here.I guess they won. unless God brings me back.this is my last post here.It's sad when Christians no longer have a site they can post on in peace. Sad that this Christian site is more like a former Christian site. You let these trolls christian bash. You let them cuss at us.This is a real shame what these trolls have done to what was once a nice Christian site. Please consider removing Christian from Christian News Network. It is no longer what it once was.

♥LadyInChrist♥InGodITrust♥

Dear Father in Heaven, I seek You to Protect the Christians from the Trolls who have taken over this site.
In Jesus Name, AMEN.

Show post

Eric #fundie disqus.com

Eric:
From context, the word sex means male or female. It would be interesting to see when they added the word orientation. Let's pray for Judge Thomas who is ill. If something is illegal at the time, then one could be fired for breaking the law. So if I find an employee is breaking a current law such as theft, I could legally fire him. So if Sodomy was still illegal in 1964 then it was legal at least then to fire homosexuals because it used to be illegal when we were still primarily believing citizens, I actually feel government should not interfere with ones family decisions either in the home or in a private workplace.

The Invisible Man:
Look at it this way: If you fire someone for being homosexual, let's say it's a man, you're firing him for being a man having a relationship with a man when you wouldn't have fired a woman for having a relationship with a man. So...it's firing someone due to their sex, isn't it?

Eric:
No, it's firing someone from your company because they are not a good fit, it's your company, and there are plenty of jobs at Target , Nike, or hair salons for homosexual men. There are many jobs not suitable or good fits for st right men too BTW so don't give me any unfair BS either.

The Invisible Man:
What sort of jobs do you think are not a "good fit" for homosexual people? What jobs aren't suitable for heterosexual people? You mentioned hair salons for homosexual men - why wouldn't a heterosexual man be just as suitable for that job? A hairstylist isn't a sex worker, you know.

Eric:
I would say tht a hair salon full of tee heeding gay men would not be a good fit for a straight man just as Sodom wasn't a good fit for Lot. But God removed him and his family befor raining down fire and brimstone on the city the day He destroyed it. They had gotten to the point in their homosexual sin that they thought that it was their "civil right" and "human right" to rape any man they wished too in "their" city. They did not respect freedom of religion or civil and human rights of others either so they and Beto [O’Rourke] share this characteristic.

Show post

Victor Justice #wingnut #conspiracy #fundie disqus.com

When will the Fake News Media stop? Quite embarrassing that leaders from around the world can see the same thing that most Americans do. Our main stream press is truly the enemy of the people! Everything that is actually good, to them is bad, and vice versus.

The Fake and discussing news media hates The Church of The Lord Jesus Christ! They hate traditional, normal families, our police, the Unborn, our troops, manhood, our great and beloved president...everything!

The Fake News Media degenerates love perversion and evil. Anyone that spits or kneels on our flag, the more deviant, violent, hateful...the better. They always want “justice” for thugs, while the honest, hard working, patriotic Americans, in their sick minds, should be held to the letter of the law!

Praise Holy God Almighty, that no lie can live forever! In a just country, the Fake News Media demons, would be taken into federal custody, transferred to one of our offshore Black sites, tried, convicted, and punished for an example to future evil doers!

I’ll never forget that beautiful November Morning, over two years ago now! Long live our wonderful president! God Almighty is deeply good, ALWAYS!

Show post

Victor Justice #wingnut #conspiracy #fundie #sexist #racist disqus.com

Little Greta’s Crippled country is being ethnically cleansed and she’s none the wiser!

Little Greta desperately needs to read some real news from the so-called far right! Become a loving wife and mother, and flush her childish rage down the toilet!

Little Greta needs to play with dolls, have a tea party with other little girls, live within a traditional, and NORMAL family!

Another victim of western deviance! Little Greta, I pray that you find Jesus Christ!

I’ve truly seen the face of unadulterated hatred today. Little Greta, You are the sister of Satan himself!

Little Miss Greta desperately needs to get Saved!

Holy God Almighty is deeply good, always! Live it and love it sour-pus.

Little Greta is truly a pathetic brat. How Dare this nothing stare down our great and beloved president!

Little Greta obviously has vile parents. I’ll bet that in a few years while other young ladies are preparing to be wives and mothers, she’ll be pushing her smelly dogs inside of a baby carriage!

Little Greta is the saddest person I’ve ever seen, communism destroys!

Show post

Brian Matthews #fundie disqus.com

Brian Matthews:
The Gospel of Jesus Christ isn't superstition. It's mankind's only hope, so you'd better accept that, or you're doomed.
Not all discrimination is wrong. Liberals use the D word as a bludgeon against truth, and morality. You use words like discrimination, bigot, racist, homophobe, etc. to SILENCE opposition to your wickedness.
As I said, the law isn't always right and good. Just ask a holocaust survivor.
And, yes, they have done something to make themselves that way. They chose their feelings over objective truth. They've deliberately rejected reality, and instead of changing themselves to conform to reality, they want to change reality to conform to them. They say they can't change, but they want the rest of us to do so. Well, I can't change either. I was born again by the Holy Spirit, and like my first birth, it wasn't something I did, nor is it something I can undo.
Not every thought, desire, impulse, or inclination is good and right. A kleptomaniac has to do something about his problem. He can't just say, "well that's just how I am". He can't just accept it.
We are all fallen, and broken. We are all born sinners. God provided a remedy for that, though.
Repent, and believe the Gospel.

Swampy:
I'm not talking about the Gospel of anybody, I'm talking about your ugly words.
I use words like "discrimination", "bigot", "racist", "homophobe" etc. to show people a mirror of how ugly their words sound to normal people.
It's true the law isn't always right. But in this case it is. And people would oppose it loudly if it weren't.
Your words tell me you understand nothing about BOTH homosexuality and empathy. There is no objective truth for one thing, it's all subjective, and no homosexual "chooses" feelings over any such thing. Did YOU choose your feelings towards your significant other? Of course you didn't, so why would it be different for a homosexual? And they aren't rejecting reality. Their reality isn't YOUR reality, that's all. If you're hopelessly locked into a religion that hates homosexuals, that's a choice you have made and you're going to be taken to task for it.
Your decision to compare a kleptopmaniac to a homosexual is for what reason? A kleptomaniac has a problem. A homosexual does not.
Homosexuals might have sins like everyone else, but their attraction to the same gender which they didn't choose and have no control over is not one of them.

Brian Matthews:
Are you really serious? Is this really how your mind works? You're not just pulling my leg?
You don't see anything wrong with what you posted? No logical problems at all?
This has got to be some kind of a joke that I'm not getting.

Swampy:
I can't tell if you're really incredulous over this simple statement of facts which should be surprising to nobody, or if you're feigning it to give off a sense of false outrage. Anyway, no. Read the American Psychological Association's page entitled "Answers to Your Questions for a Better Understanding of Sexual Orientation and Homosexuality" if you're genuinely interested.

Brian Matthews:
Oh, you are serious.
No, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. I don't want to believe people are this stupid.
And why would I read a bunch of lies, and propaganda?

Swampy:
Oh, you're an anti-science asshole. Well, you should have just said so from the beginning.
As a wise man once said, "The nice thing about science is it's true whether you believe it or not." But by all means, stick to your poisonous hateful theology and continue to marginalize all the people you hate using your holy book to justify it. Because YOU KNOW that is all you are doing.

Show post

Susan Jane Elohim #fundie disqus.com

Floodlight:
We are talking about raising a child, and the care and selflessness that goes along with doing such a thing. Qualities that are not absent merely because a parent is homosexual.

Susan Jane Elohim:
Go read “Are You a Carnal Christian?” on billygraham dot org.
Carnality is the great problem of human nature and Jesus came to forgive our sins and help us out of it.
Unfortunately, people like their literal i.e. carnal views of the Bible more than mastering God’s more spiritual views. There are a lot of baby Christians around who can talk the talk but don’t walk the walk and they like to hang out online.
But their example doesn’t invalidate the example of people who can walk the walk. Find those people to learn from then God might actually turn you into a lover.
Going from being a hater into being a lover IS true spiritual change and only God and Christ through the Holy Spirit can make that happen yet the atheists run around today saying miracles never happen.
But all you have to do is locate a few people who know God changed them from haters into lovers to know that miracles still happen.
So do your due diligence and seek.
Seeking is > arguing and you can tell that by their fruits i.e. results.

Floodlight:
Did you have anything to say on the subject of homosexuals adopting, or was this just a drive-by proselytizing?

Susan Jane Elohim:
I am explaining. The natural or carnal man is given to thinking literally. It doesn’t matter if he’s an unbeliever or a less mature Christian in the making.

Both start out carnal and literal minded because the natural man comes first then the spiritual man later if you have Jesus. That’s God explanation.

Don’t bother responding. I don’t feel like arguing. If you haven’t seen how literalminded and zealous an atheist can be then you haven’t spent as much time observing them as I have. To my way of thinking they spend a good bit of their time over reacting to literal fundamentalism which makes them just as zealous as some Christian fundamentalists are.

Why are you going out of your way to come over to a Christian site and engage people that you disapprove of if that isn’t zeal?

Think about it.

Floodlight:
I’m sorry, the subject here is gay adoption. I see nothing whatsoever in your walls of text that address that subject, and I can’t even tell if you support or oppose it.

Show post

Reconciled2018 #fundie disqus.com

Most people understand about denying the fact that a woman and a man were designed to come together to use their complementing reproductive parts to form a biological family that society will die out without it.

Most people understand same-gender couples denying kids 100% by design the right to be raised by their biological parents.

Most people understand same-gender couples denying kids 100% of the time by design the right to be raised by a mother and a father.

Why is it we never see anti-Christian activists that claim to care for LGBT never speak out about islam that kïll those into homosexuality every day in the 13 countries they run? Could it be because you're islamists pretending to be for LGBT to attack Christianity?

Most people understands people trying to perform unnatural acts with their bodies with others of the same gender that leads to a disproportionately high percentage of death by disease, yet they want to normalize such behavior bringing that disease and death to others?

Most people understands many people who used to be into homosexuality have personally turned away from it, proving it's not genetic, but instead brought about by confusion, indoctrination, mental-instability and/or abuse. Their testimonies are all over the place and growing.

Most people understand that In the end it's God we'll answer to, and we have only to ask ourselves how we think that will go for refusing to stop sinning (be it lying, adultery, fornication, twisting marriage He designed and more) and refusing His offer to forgive and forget in the person of Christ Jesus.

Please re-read the gospels and forget what anyone or any church has claimed it says.

Show post

Conservative Protestant #fundie disqus.com

Conservative Protestant:
Sticking a body part up where someone defecates from is just such a sick act. Anyone who can do that has a mental disorder and needs help. These people need help, they really do, something is wrong with them and most of the time they get harassed and persecuted instead of helped, it's all so sad.

Lucas Cranach:
So why are you talking about sodomy when the subject is homosexuality? How often do you think lesbians engage in sodomy?
This is your whole problem, you're looking only at a single sexual act between people of the same sex and ignoring the entire relationship which is no different than that of a straight couple. Would you focus on the sex life of a straight couple the way you are with a gay couple?

Conservative Protestant:
Well those are some ridiculous questions. So what do you suggest, only women can morally be homosexual? 42% of homosexuals are male, so that means 42% are sodomites, that's a huge percentage, but NOT the point.
"you're looking only at a single sexual act between people of the same sex and ignoring the entire relationship which is no different than that of a straight couple"
The relationship without the sex is just friendship, and I have that with many other men. If you add sex to it, then the relationship is blasphemy. I can't believe I even need to say that, it's just so simple.
You have NO idea what I'm looking at, even though I've made it clear, I'm looking at what the Bible says.
You are an evil person (you admitted you are against God, see below), so you can't understand ethics, morals, because without God what standard is there? The only morals there are come from God, otherwise it's just everyone for themselves. You have your morals, I have mine, someone else has theirs, who's to say which set of morals are the right ones? Only the Bible give a true set of moral guidelines.
Lucas Cranach -> Doug Bristow 3 days ago
"We don't know if God is real"
Matthew 12:30 He who is not with Me is against Me
You said you don't know if God exists, so you're not for him, making you against him. Without God, you really have no clue of reality and this discussion will never go anywhere.

Lucas Cranach:
"The relationship without the sex is just friendship, and I have that
with many other men. If you add sex to it, then the relationship is
blasphemy. I can't believe I even need to say that, it's just so simple."

And I can't believe such an outrageous statement pours out of you and you aren't completely appalled by your own lack of empathy. Do you not understand what the word "homosexual" means? Homo means same, sexual means sexual attraction. To call an entire group of human beings blasphemers because they can only fall in love with people of the same sex is beyond disgusting. And you want to talk about ethics and morals? Really?
My advice to you is to abandon your religion. It obviously hasn't done you any favors.

Show post

Oboehner #fundie disqus.com

Oboehner:
Ok then, so you have nothing [proving evolution], got it. Perhaps then you should as they say put up or shut up.

Lucas Cranach:
I didn't say nothing. I said [Dewey decimal number] 591.38. Did you go look it up, or did you play Mr. Ostrich again?

Oboehner:
If you can't argue your own points, all you're doing is proving my blind faith point. Appeal to authority arguments don't cut it either, having me doing your leg work to waste my time with more assumption and speculation doesn't help your case either.

Lucas Cranach:
I don’t need to argue them. Evolution is a science. Been to your library yet? That Dewey decimal number I gave you is still valid. We don’t need to appeal since we have proof.

Show post

Amos Moses #fundie disqus.com

(Commenting on story “Church Vandalized After Pastor Opposed Drag Queen Story Hour”)

Lucas Cranach:
I don't support drag queen story hour but it isn't pedosexuality.

Amos Moses:
by default ... yes it is ...... it is the sexualization of children and it is grooming them to be sexualized .......

Lucas Cranach:
The guy reading is the one in drag, not the kid. You have it backwards.

Amos Moses:
nope ... the guy in drag should not be near children .... you have it backwards .... and the fact he is there at all ...... it is the sexualization of children and it is grooming them to be sexualized ....... and the photographic evidence of that is available ...... and a number of them have been found to be child molesters in the past .... so i am exactly spot on

Lucas Cranach:
I agreed with you it's inappropriate he's there.
I disagree with you that it's child sexualization. Because it's not and the child isn't being endangered, just being exposed to something they're too young to understand.
What do you think "sexualizing" means anyway?

Amos Moses:
“I agreed with you it's inappropriate he's there.” then why is he there .... there is no reason .... unless the reason is to grooming children to be sexualized ..... and to prepare them to be sexualized ....
“What do you think "sexualizing" means anyway?” you have already defined it .... I agreed with you it's inappropriate he's there ....... his being there is inappropriate and it is of a sexual nature in front of CHILDREN .............. to include twerking and getting CHILDREN to give them money for dancing like it is a strip club .... FOR CHILDREN

Lucas Cranach:
He's there to read a story. He isn't there to teach them twerking or have sex with them. What do you mean "grooming"? You think he's going to do something to these kids sexually, like molest them? That isn't going to happen because he's not a pedophile, he's probably a homosexual but they would have no interest in children.

Amos Moses:
Drag Queen Story Hour Is A Grooming Program, Says Sex Abuse Counselor
22 AUG, 2019

they are PREPARING them to be molested ........ that is GROOMING ......

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie #homophobia disqus.com

A friend of mine has written a well researched book on homosexuality and he writes a website on cultural issues. He has said that in all the research he has done, he has found that homosexuals are the most hateful people on earth as they can't stand the truth so they will hate anyone who tells it and they claim it is hate speech whereas it is really speech they hate.

Show post

Sister Lottie Davis #fundie disqus.com

beaucejim:
Thing is that there was a time that Christians -unlike homosexuals - did actually go around killing people that THEY disagreed with. Your petty complaint rings hollow and your comment is disingenuous.

Sister Lottie Davis:
If you are talking about the crusades that was the Catholics, not Christians, murdering people. Including true Christians who had bibles and who would not bow to the pope. Do your know Jesus Christ as your Savior? He loves you and He died to save you from your sin. Give your heart and life to Jesus and He will give you the peace you are searching for.

Show post

cadcoke5 #pratt #fundie disqus.com

"And if they're wrong, they're not wrong to the tune of 4 billion years plus." Actual tests show that these dating methods can be off by similar magnitudes.

Actually, the radiometric dating process shows a lot of inconsistencies. For example, if the entire earth were a giant diamond consisting of only Carbon 14, all of it would have decayed in the age that secularists assign to diamonds. Yet, it is there. True the C14 gives an "age" of 55,000, if we assume the current rate of C14 accumulation. Less radiation would inflate the age. So, unless we can calibrate theC14 formation rate, we can't really take these "ages" as valid. But, at the very least, it invalidates the billions of years normally assigned to diamonds.

Soft tissue has a comparable half-life type of decay rate. So, for the evolutionists, it is foolish to expect a dinosaur fossil to have soft tissue, yet it is there.

Since lava is supposed to start at 0 years, when it solidifies, we can compare known dates of lava formations, to what its radiometric dates give. But, when we do so, for lava that was known to erupt in less than 40 ago, we can get results over 3 million years, using the Potassium-argon method normally used for supposedly old samples. But, if the rock were to contain something that evolutionists expect to be from 3+ million years ago, it is assumed to be correct. There are various proposed solutions offered for the wrong dates for modern lava, but why are presumed older rocks immune from the same problems? Why should a method that tests wrong when we can verify it, be assumed to be right when we cannot verity it?

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com


GlenGiergis:
Nobody makes the claim that people are born homosexual. Those that do probably mean that they were homosexual as long as they can remember. So that might mean it forms in early life. You aren't doing your side any favors when you misrepresent the position of your opponents.

Roger Marks:
What planet do you live on?
In 1977, just over 10% of Americans thought gayness was something you were born with, according to Gallup. That number has steadily risen over time and is currently somewhere between 42% and 50%, depending on the poll. Throughout the same period, the number of Americans who believe homosexuality is “due to someone’s upbringing/environment” fell from just under 60% to 37%.
What we do know beyond a shadow of doubt, however, is that our preferences are often hard-wired into our bodies – they are not purely psychological and, far less, a “lifestyle choice” – a deeply misguided meme for which Sigmund Freud has much to answer.
For decades, “born this way” has been the rallying cry of the mainstream gay rights movement, a simple slogan cited as the basis for both political change and cultural acceptance.
A recent article argued that sexuality is down to choice, not genetics. But the scientific evidence says otherwise, and points to a strong biological origin.
That wil do for now but I could provide you with at least 50 more articles that claim you are born homosexual.

Show post

Oboehner #fundie disqus.com

"hard to believe" I just don't have the faith in the religion of evolutionism. And therefore that something that wasn't quite a lizard has never, nor will ever be observed "evolving" into what we know as a lizard today - not in a bazillion years.

"but people like you seem to think that evolution is thought of as one type of organism giving birth to a radically different one." Nope, no radical change, no change over time, never happened - a fish was always a fish and always will be a fish.

Show post

Michael Louwe #fundie disqus.com

Story: “Australian MP Accuses Church of Handing Out ‘Hate Flyers’ in Distributing Gospel Tracts at Pride Festival”

Michael Louwe:
If outreach by Christians to LGBTQs and others is Hate Speech, then an LGBTQ Pride Festival in front of Christians and others is also Hate Speech or Hate Festival.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

UPDATE: DISQUS Channel System Removal, Safety Tips & Helpful Information

Peace to you.

Previously, I shared with you all that DISQUS is sunsetting the Channel System. I look forward to the sunsetting of channels and welcome the end of this season. I ran my race here. I finished my course. I shared Jesus Christ and truth as often as I could with everyone I could...even through intense cyberstalking, death threats, death wishes, rape fantasies, etc. I am not responsible for anyone who rejected Him (their blood is on their own heads).

I started a blog for us. I will be tagging those I trust to our new blog (with instructions). I took some suggestions from Mick (genius ideas btw) and scrubbed my Lady Checkmate account and I am no longer using that username.

(stuff deleted she has posted before)

My first tags will be to those with Private User Accounts and those who have given me their email address to be added as Trusted Users. Our serial-killer-like cyberstalker is holding his breath, anxiously stalking and hoping I post the link to our new community here, so I won't :). In fact, our community is Private, so he won't have access to it...even when he tries to follow stalk one of you with Open User Accounts to it-he's a crazed cyber-stalker that way, so don't be surprised if he's already followed one of you guys waiting for you to post there. Be safe.

Mick Williams:
I use a disposable email in case it gets hacked. It helps to stay connected in case we all want to share some new insight in the march of end times prophecy. Maybe not every day, but as the spirit wills. Another thought occurs--blogs don't have to deal with thousands of fake accounts. Once a troublemaker is locked out, he's done, unless he has enough friends to let him use their computers. In the case of solitary, lonely trolls, that isn't likely.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate’s headline: “CANADA HATES CHRISTIANS: Former Canadian PM says she's 'rooting for a direct hit' of Hurricane Dorian on Mar-a-Lago”

Lady Checkmate:
Canadian alt-left demons love to wish death, rape and hurt on Bible-believing Christians who adhere to God's word. I am not surprised that their leadership is leading the hatred and Christophobia. May God's will be done.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate’s headline: “Because everyone should know and see what the alt-left does to Bible-believing Christians who adhere to God's word...”
Brethren, I'd resisted in posting this here, but as DISQUS sunsets, I want to make sure you are aware that the Christophobic alt-left is ramping up their violence and hatred against Bible-believing Christians who adhere to God's Holy Word. Even here, on DISQUS, I received posts where the cyberstalker sent me a kill-list (with several of our names on it), demanded I kill myself, stated he mass-downvotes my comments because it makes him feel like he's "slapping me as hard as he can and that makes him feel so good" (in other words-it makes him feel good to hurt people-even when he's not really hurting them), he's stated that another Bible-believing Christian who adheres to God's word should be "shot in the head, execution style, point blank range, one bullet" and many more like it. Please read on for more...

(stuff deleted, much of what follows has been posted before)

In closing, as previously mentioned, I will not be posting any information on our new community here. I will tag those who requested a tag. I hope this helps you guys understand why we pre-moderated, and took other actions we felt were necessary. Death threats, death-wishes, rape-fantasies, and kill-lists are not funny. I mean, you guys know he's crazy...he regularly tagged you all to show his mental illness. In fact, he may tag you again-after this posts...be careful, if/when you visit a blog, the blog's admin can see your IP address, email address and other information...which is NOT safe. If he was caught stalking irl (doing the same thing in real life that he does on DISQUS), he'd be in an asylum, not encouraged to continue to stalk and harass. He's a very evil and deeply disturbed person. I truly do love you guys and pray God's will for your lives. If I don't meet you here, but you are a child of God...I'll see you heaven.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

(Lady Checkmate deleted her Disqus account and created a new one…no one knows why)

Mick Williams:
Morning, LC. The new account is a little confusing, but proceed as you think best. We're all solidly in your corner.

Lady Checkmate:
Good day, Mick Williams (Mick Williams). I apologize for the confusion, but as you can imagine, I'm not in a position to post my plans here (beforehand anyway) due to the mentally ill cyberstalker's stalking, harassment, death threats and kill-lists. The cyber-stalker obsessively stalks our channel like a deranged serial killer. We all know that there aren't many new users on the DISQUS channel system...it's dying-really dead already - and will be sunset in a few days. I believe God's divine plan is for the cyber-stalker to hear/read His Truth here. The fact is, the cyberstalker would be number one on our Contributor's List if hate and trolling were allowed, but alas :). I continue to pray that he seeks Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior. My intent is to obey God, speak the Truth in love and allow God to provide the increase. I sincerely hope he submits to God before he bows before Him.

On another note, I do not like that you and other Christians were added to the cyberstalker's "kill-list". I mean, no sane person issues "kill-lists", but cyberstalkers are NOT sane. I wanted to let you know that I'm ok with you resigning and hopefully avoiding any further harassment. We know that as Bible-believing Christians we will be persecuted, but death-threats, rape fantasies, kill-lists, death wishes, etc., in 2019? Just because we are Bible-believing Christians who adhere to God's Word? We are living in the end time. The reprobates are insane and out for blood. I am not pushing you out...you are always welcome here, but I've already scrubbed. This user account will be discarded when the channel system sunsets. I took your advice: new icon, new username, etc., Death threats, rape fantasies, death wishes and kill-lists DO touch a nerve. I wish I knew you personally to truly convey this to you in a way that would maybe make more sense and a way in which you could see my heart in this.

Finally, I appreciate all that you have done here. I have a lot of respect for you. I am trying to protect you and the others I care about here. I recommend at some point, you also follow your advice: new username, new icon, etc. The ministry here will continue, until DISQUS sunsets channels, but the cyberstalker will not be aware of our next move. Please forgive me if I did not communicate as well as possible, but there's a lot going on. The cyberstalker wants us dead...it is not funny.

Again, because everyone should know and see what the alt-left does to Bible-believing Christians who adhere to God's word:
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-battlegrounddiscuss/cyberstalkers_cross_channel_attacks_and_targeted_harassment_80/

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

image

Image says: “Yes, I am a Christian. I believe in the Bible. I do not support homosexuality or “homosexual marriage”. Yes, I still love you. Yes, we are still friends. No, I am not judging you. No, I am not condemning you to hell. No, I will not let anyone bully you. But realize that name-calling and stereotyping those of us who stand for what we believe is exactly what you don’t want done to you. We have a right to speak what we believe, same as you have a right to speak what you believe.”

Show post

Raymond Kidwell #racist disqus.com

[Commenting on AmRen’s review of “Race Differences in Psychopathic Personality: An Evolutionary Analysis”, a new book by Richard Lynn, the author of “The Bell Curve”]

I think psychopathy is a misnomer. Different races and ethnic groups have different instincts. In many cases its neither good nor bad, sometimes it affects group success or individual success. As an example, many online white nationalists will accuse "Jews" of being psychopaths, other people claim that psychopaths rise to the top of society and control the world. Neither one is accurate.

Ashkenazim tend to be more aggressive than your typical white European. They have chutzpah. They are more likely to aggressively fight for their self interests, both as individuals and as a group. A typical European may find this off putting or perhaps respectable, but its different. Of course individuals within a group vary- not all Jews are stereotypical of their group, and so on with other groups. By contrast I think the average European is too docile. They let themselves get used and abused. This explains the huge difference between Israel and European nations. Israel is a little too aggressive to non-Jews. Europe is far too accommodating.

Similarly you have differences in mating or social behavior. Polygamy and multiple sexual partners seems to be the norm in every black community across the world (other than maybe upper class blacks in a predominately white community). At the same time many white people who have tried "free love" in the hippy movement decided its not for them and they are more interested in having a single partner. Not every person conforms to a stereotype, but generally the instincts and inclinations of different races vary. But to call one group "psychopaths" and another "normal" its not really accurate.

It is true that there is a difference in altruism. European whites tend to be the most altruistic group which makes white communities generally more desirable to live in than others. By Altruism I mean a basic concern for other people, compassion, non-criminality etc.

When I delivered food for a living I saw the clear difference- even in a wealthy neighborhood where everyone has the same wealth and same cultural background there is a gigantic difference in tips. White people tip well. They gladly help others without asking for some immediate gain. There may be individual exceptions but you can clearly see altruistic behavior in a white community. Black people were the lowest- many of them tip very badly to the point where if there are a lot of blacks in the community the business is forced to charge the tip as part of the bill. Jews tend to tip the minimal. They don't want to leave a lousy tip and look bad in front of others, but they also don't want to be too generous- so they'll usually tip whatever is considered normal (like 10% or whatever) but never anything super generous. Indians from India are almost on the same level as blacks, but may care a little bit more of what others think of them. Asians are somewhere between Jews and whites.

All these little "instincts" add up to vastly different societies or communities- and different social institutions. One example: East Asian societies are plagued by authoritarianism. A major reason for this is Asians tend to be very docile and compliant (somewhat ironic that this leads to strong armed governments). In this case I.Q. doesn't account for the vast difference between a typical white community (which is more democratic) and a typical East Asian one (more authoritarian) nearly all the difference relates to instincts. Although you can see if the conditions are right Asians can maintain a democracy but it tends to slide towards authoritarianism if there are no whites to object, because there is not a lot of opposition to power grabbing. Jewish societies are the opposite. Ask two Jews a question and you get three opinions. It would be nearly impossible to maintain authoritarian rule over a predominately Jewish community (at least in the long term wouldn't work). I think "instincts" is a better word than sociopathy. In this case altruistic instinct would more specifically describe what we are observing.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Mick Williams:
It's also what compels trolls to Christian sites, while we completely ignore theirs. Deep down, they're threatened by what they know is true.

Lady Checkmate:
Well said. I shared with another brother that the irony is off the chart. An obsessed troll, who stalks a Christian site and Bible-believing Christians, spends countless hours (for years) creating sock armies and trolling and harassing (issuing death threats, death wishes, rape fantasies and creating kill-lists) has the audacity to call the people they stalk and harass, the same people who ignore them and their site...insane. Who calls the peace-keepers who ignore the loud, lying hateful, barking trolls, insane. LOL! The irony is hilarious. How does a proven crazed, mentally ill, cyberstalking troll attempt to take a moral high ground that doesn't exist. And, anyone not calling the crazed stalker, it's socks and it's irrational and illogical claims crazy...is not quite there and only enabling someone who belongs in an asylum-which disqualifies them from being taken seriously.

Interesting tidbit: When a stalker who is banned, whose socks and bots are banned immediately, and who is not welcome on a site and knows they are not welcome on a site, still creates socks to try and force their way onto that site anyway (against the other user's wishes) to circumvent their ban (which shows a violent, arrogant and forceful tendency-they must be used to forcing themselves on people), then pretends they're surprised their socks are still being banned, surprised that nothing they attempt to post using sock accounts is taken seriously, 99.9% of the time not even read, nor allowed in a community, you realize you are dealing with a seriously mentally ill person. Someone who feels seriously entitled, is extremely damaged, probably has long-term and short-term memory issues and should never be trusted. But the funniest thing, is when they pretend you want to post on their site. Then they tag you to a site you'd almost forgotten about (and someone has to tell you you were tagged because you've banned and blocked most of the trolls-again ignoring the hate), but then when you tag the owner to let them know you don't appreciate being tagged and harassed...and the owner pretends that you responding to being tagged and harassed to a site they own, is wrong. LOL! It's like, man, someone on your site tagged us there and you know we are not community members there, so why are you begging us over there. You also know that we ignore your trolls, but your trolls are now tagging us to your hate threads. Responding to you (the tag on your site) is the right thing to do, it is letting you know we don't appreciate the harassing tags on your site. We don't allow those trolls on our site because we don't want our site to look like your site...we don't want them here. In other words, you can keep your trolls, because we don't want them. If we wanted to entertain your trolls, we would do so here, but we don't. We know what they believe and we are not interested in anything they have to say, which is why them and their socks are repeatedly banned. Your trolls reject Jesus Christ, hate Bible-believing Christians and threaten our lives, we have shaken the dust from our feet. Normal, mentally healthy people do not stalk other people because they disagree with them and do not want to talk to them or better yet, listen to or read their foolish, Christophobic, blasphemous rhetoric: Cyberstalkers, Cross-channel Attacks and Targeted Harassment
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-battlegrounddiscuss/cyberstalkers_cross_channel_attacks_and_targeted_harassment/

You're more concise than I am, but yeah :).

Mick Williams:
I never even bother with the spam file, but that really hit a nerve, judging by the first few words of the latest berserker tirade.

Lady Checkmate:
I usually don't read the comment's of socks, which post to the Pending or Spam File, but the death threats, death wishes, rape fantasies, kill-lists, etc., I make sure to save to report. That hateful, evil troll, seems dead-set on harassing and killing Bible-believing Christians and it is not ok. It is not just trolling. It is terroristic death threats. Anyone supporting a troll's terroristic death threats has no credibility. There are some sick and demonic people online. Who has time to create hundreds if not thousands of socks (over years) to fill up the Pending and Delete file...that is NOT normal brother. Amos Moses visited one hate thread started by the troll, and he said he was banned after five minutes, lol. They are only interested in hate and harassment...they hate Truth.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

“Why ex-gays are despised by LGBT movement”

https://youtu.be/Ab0aPpkI33A

(LifeSiteNews) – Elizabeth Johnston, better known as the “Activist Mommy,” came to Washington, DC to address what she calls, “one of the most marginalized and censored groups in our culture: The ex-homosexual.”

Johnson spoke to a crowd of about 80 mostly former homosexual and transexual millenials who had come to the Nation’s Capital last weekend for the first annual “Freedom March,” the brainchild of Jeffrey McCall, a young man who had once lived as a woman.

“I am pro-choice,” announced Johnson, co-opting one of the sacred mantras of the sexual revolution, and turning it on its head. “I believe people who choose to engage in homosexual sin also have the right to choose not to engage in homosexuality. And they have the choice to seek therapy for their unnatural and unwanted desires.”

“I am tolerant,” she added. “I want homosexuals to have the freedom to speak their mind and beliefs. And I believe those who believe homosexuality is a sin against God also have the right––under God and under our First Amendment––to speak our beliefs.”

Earlier during the jubilant, prayerful rally on the grounds of the Washington Monument, those gathered were treated to one powerful testimony after another by former gays, lesbians, and transexuals who had discovered transformative power in Jesus Christ. These folks spoke not of “conversion therapy” but of conversion to Christ and of finding new life in Him.

“Why does the LGBT community want to silence these beautiful stories?” asked Johnson. “Because the stories of these overcomers are the death blow to the lie that homosexuals were born that way, and they cannot change.”

Mick Williams:
So much for 'being born that way'.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate’s headline: “Ex-Gay Advocate: I THOUGHT GOD DIDN’T CARE WHEN I WAS REPEATEDLY MOLESTED BY ADULT HOMOSEXUAL MEN - I WAS WRONG.” (Original article title: “Ex-Gay Advocate: I Thought God Didn't Care When I Was Repeatedly Molested—I Was Wrong”)

Joe Dallas gives his personal testimony of seduction and molestation as a young boy by homosexual pedophiles, years spent in the gay lifestyle, addiction to pornography, involvement in the “gay church” and God’s rescue from certain death and disaster.

https://youtu.be/DuFWJsJCBPM

Lady Checkmate:
Thank God He was delivered. God is good! I can only imagine the damage, hurt and confusion he suffered growing up as a young boy being raped by several homosexual men. This is another example of what the alt-left refuses to admit and address, YET, they continue to sexualize children by having them strip for homosexual men and having a homosexual man dressed as a woman teach children how to twerk in a public library. Smh.

image
(Image says LGBTP - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Pedosexual - Equality and Acceptance and shows rainbow)

Show post

Angerfist #fundie #pratt disqus.com

"Now, that some sects of Christianity have issues with the LGBT crowd is not a surprise. But to be deliberately dishonest and suggest that they have embraced pedophiles is utterly revolting, completely despicable."

I find it odd that people who advocate for no objective morals regarding sex act the complete opposite when it comes to pedophelia. The same people who say we should not judge others based on sexual predisposition turn and judge those with sexual predispositions. The same people who say we should not impose sexual morals on others turn and impose objective sexual morals on others. The same people who say we should not be so bigoted turn and act like bigots.

What is completely missed by liberals, the moment you embraced subjective morality and embraced sexual perversions with homosexuality, you paved a wide road for pedophelia.

Its a logical conclusion, not a hate filled one.

The only way to oppose pedophilia is by asserting sexuality has a certain purpose being desire and should be guided by certain objective morals.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

As it was in the days of Sodom & Gomorrah: LGBTP(edosexuals) Demand Equality and Acceptance

Say NO to the sodomites! Please pray for the children. The alt-left is promoting pedophilia, teaching children to strip and twerk for adult homosexual men and demanding that homosexual pedophiles be accepted and made a protected class:

image
(Image which was created by 4Chan trolls says LGBTP with P standing for pedosexual - says “equality and acceptance”)

Mick Williams:
It isn't about 'rights', which they've had since the Bush-Clinton era. It's about forcing their perversion on the next generation. Otherwise, it would die out, and Satan can't be having that.

Bill589:Often my problem with the LGBQXYZ is that they don’t want equal rights, they want special rights, such as being able to ‘marry’ the same gender.

Lady Checkmate:
And they also want to have children strip and twerk for them in gay bars and public libraries. It’s disgusting, inappropriate and an abomination that they will answer to God for.

Rebel:
image
(Shaman wearing a peace symbol is conducting a marriage ceremony to two very androgynous people, saying: “And now, by the authority of my crystals, my stars, the states of Massachusetts, Iowa, Connecticut & hopefully Vermont and California - I pronounce you husband and husband! And what humans have joined together, let not God put asunder!”)

Mick Williams:
This is good. I can smell the troll hair burning as they fume over it.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

PERSECUTION: Demons Came Out to Taunt

Man possessed with demons is known in the Toronto community to take under age boys from church groups out late a night without parents consent. He (a homosexual pedophile) was previously caught walking around naked on the Streets of Toronto and participating in LGBT events. Man was kicked out of 14 different churches and decided to attack Pastor David on the street while David was preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ. This man has been spoken to receive help many times in private by leaders of 14 different churches. Pastor David EXPOSES and addresses this man Publicly to Repent from Sin and Turn to the Lord.

PLEASE BE AWARE IF YOU ARE ON THIS CHANNEL OR TROLLING THESE VIDEOS TO LEAVE HATE, LIES, SLANDER and TO CAUSE DIVISION AMONG THE CHRISTIAN BRETHREN - YOUR COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED AND PROFILES BLOCKED.

Lady Checkmate (in commenting area):
Mitchell- the angry, ranting, raving cussing man is clearly a demonized demoniac, filled with hate and an evil filthy perverted lust for teenage boys. That homosexual pedophile (who often appears naked, high and drunk in public) will bow before God and be judged for his rebellion, hatred and pedophilia. Brethren, that possessed man is who Canada has deemed a "protected class". That demoniac, who feels he has a right to groom, rape and molest teenage boys (13 years old), has more rights than Christians in Canada.
CANADA HATES CHRISTIANS.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

UPDATE: DISQUS Channel System Removal, Safety Tips & Helpful Information

Peace to you.

Previously, I shared with you all that DISQUS is sunsetting the Channel System. I look forward to the sunsetting of channels and welcome the end of this season. I ran my race here. I finished my course. I shared Jesus Christ and truth as often as I could with everyone I could...even through intense cyberstalking, death threats, death wishes, rape fantasies, etc. I am not responsible for anyone who rejected Him (their blood is on their own heads).

I am working on a blog for us. I will be tagging those I trust to our new blog (with instructions). I have taken some suggestions from Mick in that area. There are certain things you guys should know:

1. Be careful when visiting and posting on certain blogs and websites. Why? Because they can see your IP address, which can be used to identify you, your address, etc. If you choose to comment or post on blogs/websites, etc., be sure to use a VPN.

2. Try to avoid shady blogs and users, sealioning - those who will (intentionally) waste your time and try to raise your blood pressure, and troll-rich environments. There are a number of sites that allow the targeted harassment of Christians, conservatives and moderates, discord, strife, etc., in an effort to increase their numbers.

3. Do not feel any pressure to respond when I tag you...my feelings will not be hurt if you do not respond or accept the invitation. Again, I will only reach out to those I trust who have asked me to reach out to them. Most of all, I want you all to be safe online and offline. In my tags, I will not ask for any personal information (name, age, address, nor any other identifying information). For my personal private blog, I may need your email address to make you trusted users, but I recommend you use an email address dedicated solely to blogging that is not connected to your regular every day email address (if you would like to be whitelisted as a trusted user). PLEASE DO NOT GIVE OUT YOUR EVERY DAY EMAIL ADDRESS. PLEASE.

In all honesty, I planned on moving on after the sunsetting of channels. I didn't see a need to further till a ground that we have already tilled and where we have already planted and sown. But, there are a few who have asked us to continue. For them, I have considered this option.

Finally, it has been a blessing meeting, discussing and serving with you all. I've grown in my Christian faith and walk with God. Every person here has taught me something. Remember, the ministry continues long after DISQUS sunsets channels. Some of you, I will never chat with again after 9/1/19, until we get to heaven that is :). We hasten the return of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I love you guys. You may see me sharing that message of love more the closer we come to the end of this journey. It's because I want you to know that you are loved before we part. God loves you and so do i (I know "I" should be capitalized, but that was a shout out to Amos :).

Let's finish these last few weeks strong.

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

"There isn't a gay person alive who would back NAMBLA or anything they stand for - gay people are just as opposed to the abuse of children as everyone else."

More homosexual mumbo jumbo. I have found over the years if you want to know the truth about anything to do with homosexuality you take the opposite view to what is being turned out by the homosexual media machine.
So....no homosexual person alive would back NAMBLA. Not true.
The fact that NAMBLA exists indicates that there some homosexual do back the organisation and the fact that their claim they are born that way resonates with some homosexuals so they will back them.
The same as some homosexuals are OK with sex with animals and some are OK with eating feces.
In fact, whatever perversion you come across, their will be some homosexuals that are for it.

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

"Two gay men entering a monogamous relationship..."

Sorry mate, a monogamous relationship and homosexuality is an oxymoron. Those sort of relationships constitute about .00000000001% of homosexual relationships. The rest are a constant search for sex outside of the relationship as has been well documented in books, and on TV and by homosexuals themselves.

Show post

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

Straight out of the homosexual denial book.
If they can form a deep lasting relationship with someone of the same sex, why is it which homosexuals research shows that they average relationship is 2 years. I don't call that deep and lasting bearing in mind that this year I celebrate my 50th wedding anniversary.
If there is no cure why have so many homosexuals become ex homosexuals? I know the gaystapo come up with all sorts of excuses to deny this fact but it doesn't alter the fact that it is a fact.
I have actually asked about 200 homosexuals for evidence that they were born homosexual. So far their evidence is zilch. They have none which says that they were not born homosexual.
Your rejection of homosexuality being a sin changes nothing at all. All it does is make you delusional and evidently you are trying to convince yourself of something that is not true.
No one was created to be homosexual as God said he created them male and female. Not male and female and homosexual.
Homosexuality is an attempt by Satan to distort God's creation and make it what it is not. That is why homosexuals generally are very unhappy people and deep down wish they were not what they are, hence so many of them wanting help to not be homosexual.

Show post

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

Today's Laugh 8-14-19

image

Image shows some sort of debate. First man says, "You're infected with a noxious groupthink that wants to silence honest debate your communist agenda can't win."
Moderator says, "The professor will rebut Mr. Smith's racist comment."
Third man says, "BIGOT...HOMOPHOBE! Security--have this man thrown out."

Mick Williams:
"Snowflake U"

Show post

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

Hierarchy--a chart of who's who in this run-up to the end, to whit: the god of this world, his Illuminati puppets, their dimocrat dupes, the communist media, and the useful idiots who make it all possible. The strobe light routine of these grinning anchors is well established for their unthinking clientele: the obligatory Trump bash, the climate change innuendo, and the fluffy human interest story. Look at the cute baby seals; ignore the Epstein-Clinton pedophile scandal; there's no DOJ noose tightening around deep state traitors like Orr and Comey.

Loudly braying the anti-gun mantra of these false flag architects, Rolling Stone calls for repeal of the second amendment. Disarmament must always precede civil war. But in a poor display of coordination, ultra liberal ESPN pulled a trailer for a film about liberals shooting conservatives for sport. The comic irony has escaped the film's writers: outnumbered liberal cowards would quickly learn the error of such a stunt.

Strong delusion, as prophesied, has set in. The CEO of Gillette has no regrets about his transgender ads costing him eight billion in revenue. Antifa fascists in New York post flyers demanding concentration camp for conservatives. Third world California deepens its indoctrination of pre-schoolers into the homosexual and Islamic agendas. Clowns making balloon animals give way to drag queen story hours. Unless these innocents are spared by an event known as the Blessed Hope, they face a dismal graduation day as card-carrying dimocrats, the latest settlers in a crowded place called The Twilight Zone.

Show post

Mark Bradshaw #fundie disqus.com

God hasn’t got a moral code chapter in the Bible." ----- The Bible *IS* His moral code.

"The closest thing is the Ten Commandments." ----- No. The entirety of the Bible is His moral code.

"But God kills a lot of people in the Bible so why is this a moral code you have aligned yourself with?" ----- God has never said it is acceptable for us to murder. In fact, He explicitly said that we shall not murder.

"What about the slavery in the Bible, the torture, the misogyny?" ----- God doesn't condone any of these acts. The accou t's of the Bible simply showed that people committed those acts.

"Why on earth do you think that is better than someone who learns from living their life that killing and raping are wrong?" ----- Learn from who? Who has told you that killing and raping are wrong? Why do YOU believe these acts are wrong?

"And no, God says nothing about why homosexual relationships are wrong." ----- Sorry, but He does reveal in His word why homosexual behavior/relations are immoral - it is counter to His design and intent for us. And, He doesnt really have to say why it is wrong, only that it is wrong.

"You can argue that God says not to engage in them, but never says why." ----- Again, the reason why is revealed in His word (scripture).

"Again, that is blind obedience on your part and very unhealthy." ----- How does having a reason change the fact that it is wrong? He has provided reasons, not that He has to. They simply arent good enough for you, so you reject them. It seems as though It wouldn't really matter what reasons He gives, you'll simply reject them.

So, I'll ask you what I've asked Miranda - what is your moral authority? What says certain things, like murder, rape, slavery, theft, etc... are wrong? Upon what basis can you claim that such acts are morally wrong?

Show post

Mark Bradshaw #fundie disqus.com

“I doubt that VERY much. No one who rapes or murders ever says they were justified by their own moral code” ----- Really? You know the hearts and minds of EVERYONE? Perhaps you didn’t know that Islam allows for rape and murder. That is THEIR moral code, and according to you, those are acceptable morals since each person determines their own morals.

“The fallacy is all yours in assuming we need a common moral code.” ----- Without a common, universal, moral code, each individual determines what is moral – this is your argument. You have NO authority to say that another’s moral code (whatever that entails) is wrong. You have NO authority to assert that your moral code is right/good/moral any more than one whose moral code condones rape and murder can claim theirs is right/good/moral.

“Yes. Just like everyone else on earth. I don’t have to use your moral code, it is worthless to me.” ----- And YOUR moral code is worthless to others that don’t hold the same moral values (ones whose morals condone rape and murder). Whpo are you to assert that YOUR morals are correct and theirs is not?

“You struggle with the idea that people have moral codes as individual as they are.” ----- Not at all. I understand that people, like you, create their own moral code – and justify all kinds of evil and horrible acts. The problem is that you cannot see the fallacy in your own position. You cannot see that your position is illogical. You call other people’s morals wrong, yet cannot show why yours are right and theirs are wrong.

“If a person’s individual morals put others in harm, those people will be removed from society.” ----- Why is harm wrong? If you say “The Golden Rule”, then why is the Golden Rule morally correct?

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

As always, I stand with the Bible-Believing Christian brethren. But, honestly, I'm not surprised nor disappointed by DISQUS sunsetting the channels. As many of the brethren are aware, for years now, a certain troll has stalked me (and several other Bible-Believing Christians), threatened our lives, issued rape-threats, posted Christian kill lists, cyberstalked us, etc., and yet, most of the other "Christian" channel owners did nothing to support us during those times. So, forgive me if I'm surprised that any of the "brethren" that allowed the same cyberstalker to use their channels to further stalk, harass and threaten us do not move me to sympathy. In fact, some of those professing "Christian" channel owners joined in on the abuse and targeted harassment, lol. You can imagine my amazement at that...I still chuckle at the thought. How will they explain abusing a Bible-Believing Christian (who has never attacked them or even mentioned their names) with reprobates and God-haters to All-mighty God on Judgment Day. In fact, check this out:

https://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-battlegrounddiscuss/cyberstalkers_cross_channel_attacks_and_targeted_harassment/

Here is one of his death wish/kill-lists, unedited...he actually lists our usernames:

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f1bd82017cbcc74444c2a4c4576020b6e40d9c539806c5e6e6e0f6dad7613b94.png

I thank God for people who stood with me, several of whom are agnostic and/or atheist...who woulda thought :). God is good! Those professing Christianity who abused and harassed me with reprobates should seek Jesus Christ and repent. I forgive them, but they still have to answer to God if they haven't already repented. I will not mention names because they know who they are. But, it would have been nice if you had told them, "You are very welcome to be part of this unity of Christians of DisQus. We are ALL family and we must stick together!!", when they were abusing us and yoking with reprobates against us.

In closing, please let me know how I can help Bible-believing Christians on DISQUS, but please also understand that I am ok with the sunset of channels. The ministry continues, with or without DISQUS. This season is over, but God has opened another door of opportunity to get the gospel out. Your move, boss :).

Show post

Mark Bradshaw #fundie disqus.com

“Have you actually taken the time to look up informed consent?” - Sure. It isn’t really a difficult concept to understand. However, YOU have FAILED to justify why consent is important or that not having it makes an action immoral. You’ve FAILED to provide the standard by which you assert rape and not having consent is wrong. You’ve FAILED to show that relations of minors in countries that don’t have legal age of consent laws is wrong. You cannot/have not applied your reasoning in a logical and rational manner.

“For God's sake, you're sitting here ASKING me why we need to protect 8 year old girls from rapists and predators.” - NO. I am asking you to provide moral justification for WHY rape of an 8 year old is wrong. You continue to FAIL to do that. You FAIL to provide a source of your morality that you don’t call “wrong”.

“Why do you require authority when no one is getting hurt or abused?” ---- Because you haven’t shown any moral authority that can assert that “getting hurt” or “being abused” is morally wrong. All you’ve said is that YOU are the arbiter of your morals. You FAIL to realize that illogical nature of such a position. If YOU are the arbiter of YOUR morals, and another is the arbiter of THEIR morals, why are YOUR morals any better than theirs? If there is no standard by which to judge morals, then ANY set of morals cannot be deemed wrong.

“What is YOUR answer if you keep telling me that mine is no good and comes from the wrong authority?” ----- My answer is that rape or abuse of ANYONE is morally wrong. The difference between my position and yours is that I have a moral authority that says such action is wrong – and all you have is YOU.

“You're going to tell me it's wrong for an 8-year old to be abused by a predatory adult because JESUS.” ---- God is the only moral authority standard. Jesus said to love thy neighbor and to not sin. Clearly, other societies don’t hold these same moral values. But, according to you, that’s A-OK because the individual determines his/her OWN morals.

“In fact I said the opposite. A slave does not consent. Stop lying your ass off.” ----- You asserted that LEGALITY is the determining factor – According to YOUR REASONING, slavery was okay because it was legal.

Show post

Mark Bradshaw #fundie disqus.com

(Excerpts of a conversation in progress - some content removed because context can’t be provided)

“No, because rapists and murderers are not consenting, they're abusing others. Once again, you do not understand informed consent.” ----- I do understand what informed consent it. But you still haven’t cited why informed consent makes behavior moral or not.

“No, because you do not understand the concept of consent.” ---- I do. And a child can provide consent. Your hang-up is “legal” consent. If the legal system has no definition of age required for consent, is having relations with an 8 year old moral or immoral? And why?

“You fail to understand the difference between consent and abuse.” ----- You’ve shown NO connection between the two. You’ve FAILED to show why a child cannot give consent – other than “It’s the law”. So, I ask again, since slavery was legal, is slavery moral?

“If they find nothing wrong with rape or murder, yes their morals are wrong.” ----- HOW can you make this claim that their morals are wrong?

“All right, go ahead and abuse a child.” ----- Again, HOW is it abuse if (the child) consents?

“Says the law. Age of consent laws exist for a reason.” ----- So, the law is the arbiter of what is/isn’t moral? I guess slavery was moral, right? What about countries/societies that don’t have laws regarding age of consent – are relations with children moral in those instances?

“And you have elected to believe your denomination is right and the rest are wrong.” ----- Not “the rest” – just those who reject God and His word. But the same could be said of YOU, right? You reject anyone that doesn’t believe the same way you do. How is that any different than what you accuse me of doing?

“- No, I'm asserting that you have what everyone else has - an interpretation, which means you're just as wrong as everyone else and no one can agree about things because you're all so sure you've chosen the 100% correct understanding.” ----- Upon WHAT AUTHORITY can you claim that I am wrong? How can YOU be sure that YOU’VE CHOSEN the “correct” morals? You cannot even cite an authoritative source for those morals.

“You're trying to give it the answer you want, but you can't do that.” ---- I am using how words are defined.

“People don't commit murder because they believe it's acceptable...come on. They do it out of desperation in their situation and because they no longer care and have lost the ability to reason.” ----- So, now you are a psychologist and can claim to know the motivations of every murderer?

“I love the way you think any two people on earth can just make the decision to copulate and it's going to work out peachy.” ----- When did I ever assert that any behavior will “work out peachy”? Why do you insist on asserting that I’ve said things I haven’t actually said?

“Desires you feel you have the right to tell people to squash because of your religion.” ----- FALSE. All that I’ve simply stated is that homosexual behavior is immoral. People “squash” emotions and desires all of the time.

“Not confused at all. I never said our parents got everything right.” ----- Yet you DID say that you learn your morals from your parents – that your parents are your moral authority.

“We get older and our brains develop and we learn for ourselves what good morals are.” ----- “Good” based upon WHAT? You are essentially saying that YOU are your own moral authority. If someone’s morals allow for murder or rape, is that acceptable? If not, then upon WHAT AUTHORITY can one assert something is good/bad, moral/immoral?

“that as we learn to think for ourselves that we don't need a holy book to tell us what's right and wrong.” ---- Upon WHAT BASIS can you determine something to be right or wrong, moral or immoral? You haven’t answered that simple question. You keep going on and on about “learning what is right and wrong”, yet have NEVER cited a source for what is right and wrong. If someone grows up learning that murder and rape are moral, how can you say that murder and rape aren’t moral?

“This is the last time I'm going to humor you on this subject since you don't know and have no desire to know the difference between consent and abuse.” ----- Again, you continue to FAIL to cite an authoritative source for why abuse is wrong, or where not providing legal consent is a qualifier of abuse. You have FAILED to show why, in a society where there is no law regarding age of consent, it is immoral to have relations with a child who has consented.

“We take rapists and murderers out of circulation when they engage in this behavior because it's abuse and it's illegal.” ----- But WHY are those acts immoral? Why are “abuse” and “illegal behavior” immoral? WHAT AUTHORITY asserts that these acts are immoral?

“We don't do the same with homosexuals because they decide to engage in a sexual act because it's not abuse. No one gets hurt.” ----- Whether one gets hurt or not doesn’t determine morality.

“Yes. Age of consent laws aren't absolutely perfect and no two countries draw the lines in the same places, but they do the best they can.” ----- So, if a country/society define no legal age limits on consent, having relations with a 6 year old is acceptable/moral?

“The 20 year old man goes to jail. Quite rightly.” ---- What about in countries that don’t have any limits on age of consent? Is that 20 year old man having relations with a 6 year old girl moral or immoral?

Show post

Mark Bradshaw #fundie disqus.com

(Excerpts of a conversation in progress - some content removed because context can’t be provided)

“We're not living in the time of slaves.” ---- Yet people DID and that was LAW at that time – yet you contend that laws determine morality. Is/was owning another human being moral?
“You are trying to corner me into saying that our morality comes from the Bible. Well, it doesn't.” ----- How can you claim where my morals originate? My morals are based in God’s morals – as enumerated in the Bible. You have NO AUTHORITY to tell me, or anyone else, where my morals come from.
(On the age of consent): “We have to draw the line somewhere because until a child's brain is fully developed, it cannot and should not be held responsible.” ----- So, your “line” isn’t really about consent, but is about ability. Why do you believe a child cannot consent to something? Why do you believe that there is some magical point at which consent given is acceptable?
“It's morally wrong for about a million reasons, not least of which we don't need a bunch of teen and pre-teen parents running around who aren't mature or capable of caring for babies.” ----- So, yet again, you are imposing YOUR morals on society.
“Allowing perverts to abuse young children IS a far worse thing than allowing two consenting homosexual adults to physically enjoy themselves, and if you can't see that or need a holy book to tell you why it's wrong is downright shameful.” ----- You still have yet to articulate how a child is harmed in this scenario. You just keep asserting “harm” without ever articulating how harm occurs. And, it isn’t about “enjoyment” – it is about what is/isn’t moral. I am sure people engaging in immoral behavior are enjoying themselves – why would they voluntarily engage in behavior if they didn’t find it enjoyable?
(On rape/murder being immoral): “can't see for yourself that it's one person enforcing their will over another which goes right against the Golden Rule.” ----- Upon WHAT BASIS can you claim that the Golden Rule is moral? So far, you have failed to answer this simple question.
“Now tell me why you need a Bible to tell you that's wrong.” ----- Because without an authoritative source, all you have is YOUR OWN beliefs of what is right and wrong. If that is all you believe is necessary to form morals, then how can you force YOUR morals on anyone else by asserting that the Golden Rule is moral?
“We don't NEED people like you to "rebuke" what you call "sins".” ----- Again, it is NOT about what I call sin, but IS about what God calls sin. Sorry you are so confused.
“We need you to mind your own business because we have the right to have chosen to believe differently than you do and don't require the morals you have chosen to follow.” ----- So, a person who believes it is moral to rape or murder is acceptable? Are the morals of individuals who believe it is acceptable to rape and murder acceptable in your world, since that is the morals THEY CHOSE?

Show post

Mick Williams/Lady Checkmate disqus.com

image
(Image shows Disqus as a sinking ship and “trolls” drowning)

Mick Williams:
Episode: On To Better Things.

Lady Checkmate:
Amen to that. As an aside, I understand the hurt and grief of the unique users who are losing their communities. On topic, the trolls are losing their minds, lol. Their years of stalking, trolling, death threats, kill lists, rape fantasies, and overall harassment (of not just other users, but of DISQUS admin and employees as well - complaining about everything from their cry-bully feelings to those they hate) accomplished nothing but to have their favorite place to troll (and them with it) deleted. Ohhhh, what will they do with their time hate now? Years of hatefully creating sock bots and entire sock armies to stalk and threaten users with was just a waste of time and their socks and bots are now useless...lol. Ain't God good? I have been so amused by the entire thing. Again, I do empathize with the grieving unique-users who are caught up un the sweep, but the trolls and their socks and bots are meeting a fitting end. Kudos to DISQUS! I ran my race, here. I finished my course, here. May God be magnified in all that we do and in all things. Most of you, I will never meet here on this earth, but for those who truly love God and are His...we will meet in heaven. To the lost, my parting words are still...seek Jesus.

Mick Williams:
The critters are definitely panicking. Without this hate outlet, they'll maybe take it to the street and get arrested, or end up in asylums.

Lady Checkmate:
Also, expect them to ramp up their trolling on DISQUS, while they can. Check out the spam folder, but be careful and do not click on any links. They are to'ed. Walk (metaphorically speaking) circumspectly, watch and pray. Most of you guys, I will never meet here on this earth, but for those who are truly Bible-believing Christians, we will meet in heaven. I look forward to that day. My parting words to the lost, after all of these years, would still be..."God loves you...seek Jesus".


Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate’s headline: “Abhor "that" which is evil..."that", not "who"”

Those with skewed world views often accuse Bible-Believing Christians of hating them...which is a bald-faced lie. We love them, but we abhor sin and evil behavior ("that which is evil") as God's word instructs us to. I repeat, we abhor evil sinful behavior...behavior like pedophilia, we abhor...behavior like adultery (and all sexual immorality), we abhor...unrighteous violence (stalking, death threats, rape fantasies, creating kill lists, etc.,), we abhor. It is not the "who" or the individual that we abhor...it is the behavior "that" we abhor.

We share the gospel with the world, even as they threaten to kill us for it. We spend time in prayer, interceding and crying out to God for them, even as they create kill lists with our names on it-because we love them as God has instructed us to and we truly desire God's will for their life. My prayer is that even though they hate us for sharing Life and Truth with them. Even though they wish death on us for praying for them. Even though they despise us, stalk us, harass us and threaten our lives, we will continue to pray for them. God is not mocked. We will continue to seek God. We will continue to love them because it pleases God and we are submitted to Him and His will. The world's hate will not stop God's Love.

Romans 12: 4-10 (KJV)
4 For as we have many members in one body, and all members have not the same office:
5 So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another.
6 Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith;
7 Or ministry, let us wait on our ministering: or he that teacheth, on teaching;
8 Or he that exhorteth, on exhortation: he that giveth, let him do it with simplicity; he that ruleth, with diligence; he that sheweth mercy, with cheerfulness.
9 Let love be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good.
10 Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another;

Brethren, we will be starting a separate community for us so that we may continue to fellowship, continue to encourage one another, and continue to share Truth with those who are truly seeking Truth. I will tag each of you to our new community when it is established. These are the end times, and we are here for a purpose...may God's will be done...forever.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate’s headline: “Reprobate Pete Buttigieg questions some GOP lawmakers' faith over their stance on minimum wage”

Theologian Jonathan Morris weighs in on Pete Buttigieg's remarks calling some Republican senators 'so-called Christians' because of their refusal to raise the minimum wage.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6066131434001/#sp=show-clips

Mick Williams:
And this from a so-called Christian himself. Eyeroll.

Lady Checkmate:
Pete is very lost and confused. I pity him...and not because I’m in any way better than him. Yes, he has earthly influence, but long term...he has nothing. Sadly, he has been greatly deceived and runs the risk of spending eternity in hell separated from the only living God. My heart weeps for Pete. It’s as if he doesn’t know...as if he hasn’t heard that God is NOT mocked. Everyone will have to give an account of what they did with this life and rather or not we lived it for Jesus Christ:
image

(image says: THE GREATEST DECEPTION OF THE DEVIL IS WHEN HE TRICKS SOMEONE INTO THINKING THEY ARE SAVED WHEN THEY ARE NOT. NARROW IS THE WAY, WHICH LEADETH UNTO LIFE, AND FEW BE THERE THAT FIND IT. MATTHEW 7:14)

Show post

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

Today’s Laugh 7-29-19

image
image

(first image: people seated at a meeting. Various voices: “Manholes must be de-gendered. How about maintenance access hole?” “Hole sounds like ‘ho’, suggesting we come in different genders.” “Maintenance access entrance/exit aperture!” “’Apeture’ bothers me.”)
(second image: man shown dropping jar containing brain. Label on jar says “normal brain”. His hands are then shown holding a separate jar with a brain labelled “Democrat brain”.)

Show post

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

“Today’s Laugh”

image

Robert Mueller rendered as Frankenstein’s monster lies motionless on a table. Two “doctors” (who resemble Adam Schiff and Elijah Cummings, I assume) speak:
Cummings: Maybe we expected too much of it…pushed it too hard and too long.
Schiff: No!! Give it another 20,000 volts!!

Show post

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

Good evening. I shall begin with the astonishing assertion that the modern democrat party is the best thing going for Christianity. Before I prove my thesis, note my avoidance of "democratic", since these unwitting servants of the gospel are anything but. Don't bother with a Google search for "democrat party". They will immediately correct your spelling to "democratic party". If you seek anything critical of democrats, be prepared to wade through countless pages of glowing praise. One would think both the DNC and their big tech enablers were legitimate entities.

Their persecution of the faith confirms the Bible prediction, thus strengthening the believers' faith. Recall the Battle of Britain to know that human nature requires resistance to bullying and tyranny. Thirdly, we can reliably take our cue from folks seduced into a backward paradigm. If they oppose it, it has to be a good thing.

Then there are the consequences of unbelief. The Book confirms strong delusion, for one. No rational mind can change its sex or race on a whim. Is it rational to coddle Islam, which takes a sword to the sacred cows of homosexuality and feminism?--or to attack the patriots who espouse a strong border? It is a reprobate mind that lusts after children via drag queen story hours. Ditto for one that decides against parenthood at the moment of birth, taking advantage of democrat laws allowing termination. As the list is a long one, I shall move on.

Our leftist friends also confirm the supernatural in their gibbering hatred of the president, its kneejerk triggering of no earthly origin. Perhaps the unseen entities riding them are channeling their master's ire at the president's anti-globalist agenda. It's a pipe dream the left has nursed since the Tower of Babel.

Finally, scoffers confirm the prophetic account, be it Tribulation or Second Coming. Evil men are indeed waxing worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived. Though long a truism, the end-times American model charts on an exponential curve. After all, the U S is the final obstacle to the left's communist hell on earth. Since the Evil One is the conductor of this infernal orchestra, this, ironically, makes him the greatest dupe of all.

I shall now return to the relative sanity of black and white vintage TV. Good night.

(Includes photo of Alfred Hitchcock, not included here)

Show post

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

They call him Orange Man, a president whose every word triggers them into paroxysms of hysterical rage. Yet these enemies of freedom are no bigots. They label him a sexist akin to the religious death cult they champion; a baby-killer who would deny women their "reproductive right" to infanticide; he's all the evils unknown on their side. Doubters have merely to check with their pet media.

Who are these modern masters of hypocrisy? They're the legacy of the old Soviet Bloc, who, failing to defeat us on the battlefield, planted the seeds of internal rot. So brilliant has been its success that the Cultivators are now turning on each other; so complete has been their descent into lunacy that some of their own are being scared straight. A worried Russian president, in fact, insists that liberalism is harmful to the host, hoping to forestall the complete collapse of the disease.

The Dregs, known to Russia as "useful idiots", are those the state has divorced from the Good Book. Lacking absolute truth, their moral compass is a weather vane duck with spinning wings, blown about by the hot breath of that old serpent they'll never see. After all, no heaven equals no hell in the algebra of the left.

A certain "wealthy financier" laments that the president is dismantling the New World Order. Sensing his re-election, certain Middle East actors are making overtures of peace. Nor is an EMP attack likely, since the Illuminati need the internet. Time to relax? Not according to those who like to quote "at a time ye think not", when all seems normal and prosperous. The sudden absence of millions will likely crash a house-of-cards economy propped up by a rapidly withdrawing Restrainer. It's a crisis tailor-made for a man waiting in the wings, stage left, in The Twilight Zone.

(Accompanied by a photo of Rod Serling, not included here)

Show post

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

Useful Idiot Logic

Colleges used to teach sequential logic, a three part statement that proves the conclusion via a central link. Liberal education has no use for it, so it had to go. Here's an example:

Fingers are part of the hand; the hand is part of the body; therefore fingers are part of the body.

Even a liberal wouldn't debate something so obvious. Since truth is their kryptonite, they use two part inferred logic, which is always false. To whit:

You don't wear the rainbow jersey; therefore you're a homophobe.

Note the absence of a link, since none exists. The burden of proof is on the accuser, which isn't a problem since he has a blank check courtesy of the fake media. Has the accused made anti-gay threats or jokes?--belonged to a vigilante group that stalks them? Note also that 'phobia' is an irrational fear, such as that of sunflowers (yep--it's on record). Here's another entertaining example of child-like reasoning:

The president said four non-white congresswomen should go back to their home countries; therefore he's a racist.

Wow, where to even begin. First, the president has never made a racist statement. Second, note the omission of the real target of his ire: the rabid anti-Americanism of these four useful idiots. His remark is an opinion: If you hate this country, then leave. Now let's prove our useful idiot comment.

Useful idiots, as defined by Joe Stalin, blindly follow the communist party line; these four women blindly follow the communist party line; therefore these women are useful idiots.

The proof of their communist agenda is abundantly found in their hatred of Israel, dislike of strong borders, anti-Christian statements, love of socialism. . . .that's another post entirely. Case closed.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Mr. Opinionated:
Every single person I have ever known, gay or straight, has described their sexual orientation the same way: they didn't chose it, it was just always there and part of who they were.
I'm a believer, but there are many reasons I can't accept the idea that homosexuality is a sin against God. God creates us, and he knows who we are before we are born. People don't chose to be gay, they are born that way. I can't chose to love a man anymore than my gay brother can chose to love a woman. And if they don't have a choice, then God created them like that and I can't accept the idea that God would create people to be sexually immoral and have to endure that throughout their lives.

Lady Checkmate:
Hi Mr. Opinionated. First, thank you for taking the time to comment, respectfully. Second, I will do my best to speak the Truth in love to you, because Christians love people, even when we don’t agree with their choices. I repeat, Christians love people, even when we disagree with their choices. What does that mean? That means that “disagreement” is NOT hate. That means that I love you and because I love you as Christ instructed me to, I will speak the truth in love with you and pray you come to know Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. I will not argue with you, I will only share God’s Truth and move on. Here we go....

You stated you are a “believer”, but you did not say what you believe, so that could mean anything. God’s word, the Holy Bible, states that if someone (as in a Bible-believing Christian) loves God then they (as in Bible-believing Christians) will obey Him. Anyone who is indeed a “Bible-believing Christian”, will love God enough to obey Him and deny themself, i.e., their flesh. Now, please understand that that may be difficult (and is impossible without God) because the flesh wars against the spirit. That means that even though a Bible-believing Christian’s spirit wants to obey God, their flesh does not. This is when we must submit ourselves (including our flesh) to God’s authority and deny our self (our flesh) taking up our cross and following Jesus Christ instead of being led by our flesh. God is a spirit and those who worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth...in spirit and in truth...not in flesh and lies.

Every true Bible-believing Christian (like the OP Beckett and many others who lived the same lifestyle) acknowledges that sin is a choice. Every true Bible-believing Christian has denied selfish flesh and is worshipping God in spirit and in truth. Bible-believing Christians do not argue for, nor defend sin, we seek to obey God and live holy and upright before Him. I apologize if you have been taught a false, watered down gospel. We regularly pray for all followers here and will pray for you as well. Please seek Jesus Christ.

Show post

Amos moses #fundie disqus.com

The UN Is Normalizing Pedophilia: The Deep State Is Free to Prey Upon Your Children

https://hnewswire.com/the-un-is-normalizing-pedophilia-the-deep-state-is-free-to-prey-upon-your-children/

Excerpts:
“The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights is sanctioning a sexual revolution that will culminate in the legalization and whole-hearted support of transgenderism but will also support the legalization of pedophilia.”
“Years ago, I wrote about the fact that the North American Man-Boy Association (NAMBLA) was advocating for the legalization of pedophilia. Their identifying banner statement is “sex before 8 or it is too late”. Care to guess who their largest contributor is? NAMBLA’s largest contributor is George Soros.”
“If that is not concerning enough for you please realize that Kevin Jennings, an Obama Department of Education official, and a close friend of Hillary Clinton has involvement with this group as well.”

Amos Moses:
they all have their PRIDE in common .......

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Newest target of Left is biggest one of all: your marriageThe professional association that bowed to pressure from homosexual activists during the 1970s is now advocating adultery among married couples.

Laurie Higgins of the Illinois Family Institute (IFI) suggests no one should ever consider the American Psychological Association a legitimate source again, citing the push for “consensual non-monogamy” from a group of lesbian and homosexual psychologists.

According to Higgins and IFI, an APA group known as Division 44, founded in the 1980s, formed a "task force advisory board" last year that examined consensual non-monogamy in the interest of “relationship diversity" and has now released its findings.

“Consensual non-monogamy” is professional euphemism for adultery and infidelity.

(full article here: https://onenewsnow.com/culture/2019/07/12/newest-target-of-left-is-biggest-one-of-all-your-marriage)

Lady Checkmate:
Again, their goal was always to mock and trivialize marriage. This is just a continuation of their original goal. But, God’s will will be done in spite of their mocking and hate.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Supreme Court to hear case that could bring major changes in school choice laws
(The Supreme Court to hear a Montana case which asks if states can ban aid programs for those who send their kids to religious schools.)
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6057946504001/#sp=show-clips

Mick Williams:
It's about time to take down liberal education. And while we're at it, big pharma, the fake media, the list is a long one.

Lady Checkmate:
Agreed. It’s past time to take them down. They’ve used the public education system, msm/fake media, big pharma, etc., to spread their lies and propaganda and indoctrinate the masses...starting with the youngest and most vulnerable. The alt-left is a cruel, wicked, manipulative group, and they will bow before almighty God and answer to Him for their wickedness and rebellion. We must continue to pray. The education system, public school systems and alt-left reprobates are doing their best to indoctrinate children with the lies and confusion of the enemy. Families should be able to decide where they want to send their children and what they want their children taught as far as morals and values.

Show post

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

image

CNN reporter says “New round of subpoenas against Trump”. Foreground shows a demon (?) holding a hand of cards that say variously “Deep State Islam”, “Borders - UN”, Media - Schools”, “Dims (sic) - trans”, “Apostasy - LGBT”, “Soros - BDS” and “Antifa”. Bare hand with white sleeve holds single card which reads “Second coming”.

Show post

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

I'm not a fan of Beth Moore (at all), but women can teach women...biblically. God is no respecter of persons so I'm not sure how egalitarianism applies, but I would be interested to know. I don't have any hope in Beth Moore and I do NOT follow "her" ministry. Still, I don't agree with some of the "heresy hunters" and "religious watchdogs" and truly believe that some of the Christians under attack are being wrongfully harassed by other "Christians", which does not please God. Even David Lynn is being harassed by another "Christian". It's time for the church to stop attacking Bible-believing Christians and start praying for each other. With everything David is going through, it broke my heart to see someone else who claimed to be a "Christian" attack him. I have been attacked by professing "Christians" right here on Disqus. This was awhile back, when our community first picked up a cyberstalking reprobate who sometimes presents itself (via it's socks) as a "Christian" (CINO) to infiltrate "Christian" communities and cause division, strife, discord, etc. Well, at that time, it appeared that a couple of professing "Christians" had aligned with the cyberstalking reprobate to persecute and harass us Bible-believing Christians...especially me because our community is a Christian safe-space. The reprobate's targeted harassment and persecution (although hateful, unwarranted and just plain wrong as it escalated to stalking, death and rape threats) was predictable per scripture, it was the harassment of the professing "Christians" that caught me off guard. I could not find one scripture in God's word to approve of the hate and harassment coming from professing "Christians" to another Christian. I also couldn't find one scripture to support "Christians" aligning with reprobates to target and harass other Bible-believing Christians. True story: there were actually "Christians" who participated on hate channels created by reprobates to stalk, harass and threaten me and a few other Christians. In fact, those same hate channels were created by the same reprobate that stalks many Christians on a third-party website created for the sole purpose of targeting, stalking, harassing and threatening Bible-believing Christians. Those same "Christians" were/are also allowing reprobates to post harassing and threatening OPs against other Christians in their "Christian" communities. Ironically, those same "Christians" are also targeted, mocked, harassed and hated on that third party site, smh. I grew so much in that season. I realized that NOT everyone who says they are a "Christian" actually is a Christian. And, in case you're wondering (not you :), but anyone else)...they were upset that we don't allow blasphemy, heresy, mocking, harassment, persecution, false doctrines, etc., here. Our community is actually a safe-space for Bible-Believing Christians. I don't believe blasphemy, heresy, mocking, harassment, persecution, false doctrines, etc., are allowed in heaven either, but I guess the "Christians" who aligned with reprobates to harass me, felt I should allow blasphemy, heresy, mocking, harassment, persecution, false doctrines, etc., in the name of free speech...lol. The Bible doesn't support free speech...it supports Truth. Truth sets the captives free. We actually have peace here now, no discord, no strife, no heresy, no false doctrines, no persecution, etc., I thank God they're gone..."they" as in the mockers, scoffers, blasphemers, heretics, reprobates and CINOs. I shook the dust from my feet. I NEVER spoke a negative word about any of those "Christians" nor mentioned their usernames, and I also NEVER allowed anyone else to attack them in this Christian community (which is alot more than what any of them did for me). The body of Christ is not divided. And, to show the goodness of God...there were actually unbelievers and agnostics who defended me and stood against the targeted harassment, threats and cyberstalking...who would've thought ;). God will judge between Bible-believing Christians and those who persecute us.

Show post

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

“Pretenders”

The inmates have put on suits and ties. That veneer of respectability has fooled the undiscerning, and now the lunatics have taken over the asylum. Case in point: the dimocrat debates, hosting a fifth column who have abandoned all pretense of rationality. Having graduated the corrupt school system as card-carrying liberals, their source of voters is confined to the dregs. Hence their zeal in vying to outdo each other in delusionality, reacting to trigger words like 'Trump' with howls of self-righteous indignation.

Comrade Sanders wants free college. Like giving a blank check to a home remodeler, this guarantees no limit to hikes in tuition. His plan to place rotating judges on the supreme court to infuse 'fresh blood' requires some translating of the dim-speak: fresh blood equals liberal stooges who will obediently toe the globalist line. Comrade Fauxcahontas wants 'gay reparations'. Like its Civil War counterpart, this penalizes that vast majority who have done nothing wrong. Of course, to the leftist mind, deplorables are responsible for all the nation's ills.

Local news has been permanently co-opted by the left. When the president launched a cyber attack on the mad mullahs, reporters found a computer student who performed on cue by calling it 'unprecedented' and 'dangerous'. When the president called off an air attack, liberal anchors called it 'weak' in the expected knee-jerk opposition to everything he does.

Yet the leftist spin-meisters ignore the rapidly festering beast system. Retailers are putting together a social score that raises prices for those who don't pass muster. On Walmart's self-serve kiosks, your not-so-smiling face confronts you on the monitor. Try not to wink, lest it lower your score and bring it to the attention of one who awaits his call onto the world stage.

image

(image is Bernie Sanders wearing a mask of…someone.)

Next page