www.townhall.com

Show post

Oscar #wingnut townhall.com

(commenting on the article “Christian Supporters of Trump, the President Can Defend Himself”)

I disagree completely. It is absolutely safe to say that us Christian Republicans have not gone far enough in defending him.
Our enemies hypocritically accuse us of worshiping him and attack us for it, even though that’s what they did to Obozo.
Only filthy RINOs don’t defend the man when the devil-worshiping libtards make up blatant lies against him.
When you look at the wickedness of the DemonRats, it’s obvious that this matter is black and white, good and evil, and that God is 100% on the president's side.

I cheered for Donald, as he was immediately my favorite in the primary.
I voted for him because he seems like a wonderful person. I've never failed
to be pleased at how great that decision turned out to be. I know that he's
a Christian and a true conservative, even though some laughably claim he isn’t.
He's quickly become the best president of my lifetime and has done, with
virtually no exception, a wonderful job to this point, in my opinion.

I promised I'd support the new president as much as I could, without fail.
I promised I'd defend his honor when his enemies lied about him. So far,
I've done both, and hopefully will continue to be ethical in my support.

I somewhat get the author's point here, and agree we don't need to explain our choice
to the traitorous Never-Trumpers, and much LESS so to the demon leftists. Both groups can
go to hell. But I disagree with the claim in this title - Trump has not shown weakness
or restraint when defending himself. For that fact, I have a completely different take on
this matter; I think Donald should let US defend him and not try to do it himself. I believe
his rating would go sky-high if he would allow us to do that FOR him.

Show post

libertyanyday #sexist townhall.com

females are petulant children.....demanding selfish tantrum throwing children...........as long a they are treated as such .......all is good. Men are and always will be the dominate sex ........that’s just how it is........society is built by MEN not females.

Show post

John miller #fundie #homophobia #wingnut townhall.com

Not calling names. You are a nasty weirdo who puts nasty things in your BUTT!
You don't know the difference between a man and woman.
You don't even know which restroom to use.
And you don't know an adult from a child.
You want people to believe you are capable of raising a child? Pfft.
O'blunder tried to take those who protect children from weirdos like you out of the equation. TRUMP PUT THEM BACK!!! HA HA HAAA
Get a cat! Or do like Muslim pedophiles and get a goat!
The days of the freaks and weirdos warping U S children are OVER!
I'm not the punk-ass Christians you weirdos are used to pushing around. Call me a MILITANT CHRISTIAN! I'm taking down all the weirdos I can in this life time by calling you what you are to your face: TRASH!!!
I will tell EVERY CHILD I know that alphabets are evil FILTHY trash who spit on God with their disgustingly WRONG lifestyles.
STAY AWAY FROM ALPHABETS CHILDREN!!! ITS THE GROUP WHERE MONSTERS COME FROM!!!
PS, normal children think you are weirdos too. It takes brainwashing to convince them otherwise. And now you can't brainwash or warp or harm children anymore! Thank God!
And, as soon as the demon RBG Is dead, you won't be able to kill them in the womb anymore!
Jesus Christ Rebukes you and so do I.

Show post

Ted R. Weiland #fundie #sexist townhall.com

Just think: Had the Constitutional Framers (like their early 1600 predecessors) established government upon the Bible's immutable unchanging moral law, including mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders (instead of banning them in Article 6*):

"Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able MEN, such as fear God, MEN of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers...." (Exodus 18:21)

"As for my people, ... women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." (Isaiah 3:12)

"But I suffer not a woman to ... usurp authority over the man...." (1 Timothy 2:12)

One word alone in Exodus 18:21 (pick anyone of them) eliminates Hillary, Pelosi, Ginsburg, Ocasio, etc., etc., etc. The remaining qualifications would send all of their cohorts in crime (women and men, donkeys and elephants alike) packing as well.**

*For more regarding Article 6's Christian test ban, google online Chapter 9 "Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land" of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."

**Then Chapter 28 "Amendment 19: The Curse of Women's Suffrage."

Show post

John miller #fundie #homophobia #wingnut townhall.com

I believe alphabet dope trash are angry because reality is slapping you in the face.
Y'all need acceptance and for everyone to tell you it's ok to be filthy dope alphabet trash. It is NOT.
Y'all have to be strung out on drugs to even accept your own lives.
And now you've discovered (other than yo mama and other trash) nobody accepts you, you’re a freak and can't handle the truth. Boo hooo! Most people find you utterly disgusting and don't even want you in their presence. You give people the creeps.
Having a child is an ACT OF NATURE!!! YOU ARE UNNATURAL FREAKS!!!
YOU CAN’T HAVE BABIES, NOR CAN YOU ENTER INTO HEAVEN!
Heaven has a wall and gates and souls are heavily vetted.
NO ALPHABETS ALLOWED!!!
Guess what? Illegal Mexicans can go to heaven. Unless they're a practicing alphabet!
NO ADOPTION
NO HEAVEN
And I won't be worried about PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP leaving office for FIVE MORE YEARS!!!!
PS Epstein didn't kill himself!!! Lmao

Show post

Oscar #homophobia townhall.com

The clear answer to the question in the title is yes, religious freedoms must lose
when gay "rights" wins. It's a zero sum game; there is no other alternative - it is
as simple as America, or homosexual "rights"; we cannot have both at the same
time. To our shame, we Americans did not take this existential threat seriously,
had no idea how powerful is the pervert lobby and only realized it after the radicals
took over and we began to lose our rights. The domino effect is in effect. The trickle
has become a flood. The gays won an inch and took a mile. That happened, folks,
not in North Korea, but in a nation FOUNDED for religious rights! In the shining city
on a hill. And if it could happen here, NO country on earth is safe.

Had someone told me just a few decades ago, that in a cynical ploy for votes, the
left would one day hitch its wagon to sexual per version, I would have laughed him
to scorn. I'm not laughing now.

Show post

John miller #fundie #homophobia townhall.com

John miller: Maybe I'm in the minority here; But I would rather see a child raised by wolves or apes. And NEVER be influenced by mentally ill sexually confused Alphabet freaks.

Good Christian Traditional families have been refused adoptions since the big eared Muslim King and his manshell wife soiled the white house on day 1.

O'blunder tried to continue brain warping children on his way out the door by signing papers denying Christian agencies the ability to handle adoptions unless they agreed to also sacrifice children to Satan by giving them to mentally confused same-sex adults who were living together and practicing unnatural acts apposed by God and describe as "abominations" in the Holy Bible.
That’s why you see big-hearted Christians HAVING TO adopt black or brown babies from SHITHOLE countries.
More sadistic liberal sacrificing of children. They murder them with abortion ; they control and warp them through adoptions.
Just President Trump undoing more of Obama's evil against children being twisted into a lie.

JaxJJ (not me): You're an idiot and a freak. There's no other way to put it and no decent Christian would have anything to do with you.

John miller: I wouldn't spit on a tickle your ears alphabet accepting hypocrite you modern freaks call "Christians"
I'm going with God's word ! And I love that TRASH like you get offended by what I said. Your ignorance Is humorous to me. But God will cast Alphabets and their sympathizers into a lake of fire right along with your prince of darkness to be eternally disposed of like the garbage you are.
To put children with mentally confused sexual perverts I nothing shy of satanic!!!

Show post

Mandrake #racist townhall.com

The refugee program was set up for displaced Europeans following WW2 - not as a tool for non-Caucasian denizens of TW cesspits to freeload off US/Western taxpayers.

The USA does not owe the World a living.

Show post

Halimolobos #fundie #homophobia townhall.com

I absolutely DO NOT agree with you, Reagan! Letting gays adopt and raise children is one of the worst forms of child abuse. I want to know how this was ever approved in the first place. I do not remember the people of this country ever voting on approving this policy, and I suspect it would have been voted down by them. Now, with all the radical Leftists' propaganda/indoctrination/misinformation about this topic being taught in our schools from day one and forced on this country, the ruinous supposed acceptance of same-sex marriages and its 'legalization' and 'twisting' of the Constitution by the SC (that we were never allowed to vote on either), people of faith are being trashed and innocent children victimized. CHOOSING the gay life style is a sin against God and nature (an evolutionary dead-end). It will not bring happiness to those who chose it and that choice should totally disqualify them from adopting and raising children.

Show post

temporary guest #fundie #homophobia townhall.com

(commenting on an article about why Christian adoption agencies shouldn’t discriminate against homosexuals)

I guess if I need advice on how to be a moral Christian, I won't need to read the Bible anymore. I can just consult Michael Reagan. He doesn't seem to have a problem with judgement. He's got it all locked down.

If Michael Reagan knew scrap about how precious children are in the eyes of the Lord, what the Bible says about homosexuality and those who practice it, and what the Lord, Himself said about those who offend children, he'd know better than drop a load of sanctimonious, judgemental, phony, fake-righteous crap like this. How does surrendering children into households of LGTBQ people keep a Christian unstained from the world? For a Christian, it does exactly the opposite. By what moral authority do you tell Christians they should be willing to do that? There is nothing in the Bible that tells Christians they should do such a thing, and most certainly not in the name of Christ. The Bible takes sexual perversion very seriously, and doesn't care who calls it "love".

Using children to moralize a leftist political argument is a thing democrats are very good at, isn't it? Moralizing every political issue and politicizing every moral issue, done by sanctimonious, self-righteous democrats, is exactly what created the mess the country is in today.

Throwing babies away with the bath water never has been, and still isn't a good ideal. It certainly isn't a Christian one, so don't expect Christians to cow-tow to your personal moralizations. If YOU really care about Jesus' children, Mr. Reagan, think on that for a while.

You seriously want to help? Then help get the 800 pound LGBTQ/democrat imposed government bear off the backs of Christian organizations. Christians can't even bake cakes or sell flowers, can't even say a man is a man and a woman is a woman without getting that bear on their backs, right here in the "land of the free and the home of the brave". Why don't you do something about that? Why don't you defend and aid Christian adoption agencies rather than condemn them? You certainly have more clout than I would.

The world's not perfect, Mr. Reagan. Get over it. This judgemental, anti-Christian (not to mention anti-Trump) diatribe of yours is pathetic.

Show post

temporary guest #fundie #wingnut townhall.com

Donald Trump certainly is just like King David, because he just reminds me so much of him. David went up on a hill and found the army of Israel marking time while Goliath came out and challenged them to send just one man to fight against him. David wanted to know who was this dog who defied the army of the living God and the answer he got was basically, "Goliath is too big to hit!". Davids answer to that was "No, he's not! He's too big to miss!" Then, using his sling, he struck Goliath in the head with a stone and chopped of his head with his own sword, inspiring the army of Israel to rout out the Philistines.

As I said, President Trump is just like David. It's also true that our leftist democrats are just like Goliath. Any honest observation can see that President Trump is pretty good at striking the democrats right between the eyes with the very rocks they throw at him, and they are chopping themselves to bits just trying to score a hit President Trump.

My prediction is that come the 2020 election, two things are going to happen: The democrats will try every trick in the book to cheat and the American people will vote for Donald Trump like the army of Israel running down the Philistines.

The real problem is this: If Donald Trump wins, those who call themselves "the resistance" will use his victory as an excuse to become more riotous, more violent and more dangerous, and if President Trump should loose, those same people will use the democrat victory as proof that even greater "resistance" (violence, disrespect and riots) against conservatives and Republicans is mandated by the majority of voters, even if it is obvious that voter fraud is the means by which a democrat might win.

Sooner or later, we're going to have to deal with the leftist anarchists among us in a way that they can understand, permanently.

Show post

ScottPM #fundie townhall.com

ScottPM: islam is more of a political movement to subjugate others that is masquerading as a religion. And if needed, i’d support a Constitutional amendment removing them from the free exercise of religion clause.

Jesse4: "And if needed, i’d support a Constitutional amendment removing them from the free exercise of religion clause."

Not a bad idea. And while we're at it, we should ban the other two desert religions also. They've never done anything but cause trouble.

ScottPM: Ah, so you object to the fact that Christians led the abolition movement. Why do you want to bring back slavery? (To the US, it still exists in other places around the world.)

Jesse4: It was mostly Christians who owned slaves in the US too.

Show post

Oscar #fundie #wingnut townhall.com

I worry if evangelicals WILL be the key to his re-election,
but they certainly SHOULD be. I believe Trump is a Christian.
I highly disagree with the left that he's anywhere near as
small, sexist, petty, and misogynist as they paint him to be.
I like the Donald personally, and I believe he's a great
family man. At times, I wonder how the man's even still sane
with all of the false character assassination against him!

All that said, when I look at the clown car of radical extremists
on the Dem's side, I will eagerly and gleefully vote for Trump.
Some things are difficult and complex. Some things are morally
challenging. This ain’t one of them. As an evangelical Christian,
I know he's our Savior from the satanic, commie Demoncraps. I will
face a holy God without fear, knowing that I did my small part in
keeping Socialism out of the White House.

Show post

bknight104 #fundie #wingnut townhall.com

Worshipers of the Demon Molech will come up with any evil excuse to continue to sacrifice their children on the alter of abortion. There is a judge higher than SCOTUS and Roe vs. Wade and will judge murderers according to his universal law, not human law based on Satanic propaganda.

Show post

Townhall #fundie townhall.com

The Democrats are said to be the party of Jim Crow, black codes, and the Ku Klux Klan—but it’s the GOP that’s racist, or something. These historical debates get the Left and Right going on social media. Yet, a new study just slays the whole notion that liberalism is averse to racism. It’s the seat of irony. The report found that white liberals dumb themselves down while interacting with minorities in order to get along with them (via Yale Insights):
Racial bias can put people of color at a disadvantage when interviewing for a job, buying a house, or interacting with the police. New research suggests that bias may also shape daily interactions between racial minorities and white people, even those whites who tend to be less biased.
According to new research by Cydney Dupree, assistant professor of organizational behavior at Yale SOM, white liberals tend to downplay their own verbal competence in exchanges with racial minorities, compared to how other white Americans act in such exchanges. The study is scheduled for publication in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
While many previous studies have examined how people who hold racial bias behave in multi-racial settings, few have studied how whites who are more well-intentioned interact with people of other races. “There’s less work that explores how well-intentioned whites try to get along with racial minorities,” Dupree says. “We wanted to know their strategies for increasing connections between members of different social groups—and how effective these strategies are.”
Dupree and her co-author, Susan Fiske of Princeton University, began by analyzing the words used in campaign speeches delivered by Democratic and Republican presidential candidates to different audiences over the years. They scanned 74 speeches delivered by white candidates over a 25-year period. Approximately half were addressed to mostly-minority audiences—at a Hispanic small business roundtable discussion or a black church, for example. They then paired each speech delivered to a mostly-minority audience with a comparable speech delivered at a mostly-white audience—at a mostly-white church or university, for example. The researchers analyzed the text of these speeches for two measures: words related to competence (that is, words about ability or status, such as “assertive” or “competitive”) and words related to warmth (that is, words about friendliness, such as “supportive” and “compassionate”).
[…]
The team found that Democratic candidates used fewer competence-related words in speeches delivered to mostly minority audiences than they did in speeches delivered to mostly white audiences.
Gee—I wonder why white liberals feel the need to dumb themselves down in front of non-whites. Is it because they find them…incompetent? That appears to be the case (via Washington Times):

“It was kind of an unpleasant surprise to see this subtle but persistent effect,” Ms. Dupree said. “Even if it’s ultimately well-intentioned, it could be seen as patronizing.”
The study flies in the face of a standard talking point of the political left—that white conservatives are racist—while raising questions about whether liberals are perpetuating racial stereotypes about blacks being less competent than whites.
[…]
The researchers then set up an experiment in which white liberals were asked to respond to hypothetical individuals named “Emily” and “Lakisha.”
“[L]iberal individuals were less likely to use words that would make them appear highly competent when the person they were addressing was presumed to be black rather than white,” said the release. “No significant differences were seen in the word selection of conservatives based on the presumed race of their partner.”
Ms. Dupree said the “competence downshift” could indicate a greater eagerness by white liberals to connect with those of other races.
“My hope is that this work will help include well-intentioned people who see themselves as allies but who may be unwittingly contributing to group divides,” said Ms. Dupree. “There is a broader need to include them in the conversation.”
Still, a white liberal making him (or her) seem dumb because they find the non-white they’re interacting with less competent. That seems…pretty racist.

Show post

justdale, Duddly Doright #fundie townhall.com

justdale: How does a muslim get to be the mayor of London? Terror attacks didn't become part of living in a big city until muslims started migrating to Europe and the U.S.

Duddly Doright: The answer to your question is "Democracy". When the Muslims moved in the infidel's wisely moved out, thus London is majority Muslim.

Show post

Kurt Schlichter #fundie townhall.com

They hate you.

Leftists don’t merely disagree with you. They don’t merely feel you are misguided. They don’t think you are merely wrong. They hate you. They want you enslaved and obedient, if not dead. Once you get that, everything that is happening now will make sense. And you will understand what you need to be ready to do.

You are normal, and therefore a heretic. You refuse to bow to their idols, to subscribe to their twisted catechisms, to praise their false gods. This is unforgivable. You must burn.

Crazy talk? Just ask them. Go ahead. Go on social media. Find a leftist – it’s easy. Just say something positive about America or Jesus and they’ll come swarming like locusts. Engage them and very quickly they will drop their masks and tell you what they really think. I know. I keep a rapidly expanding file of Twitter leftist death wish screenshots.

They will tell you that Christians are idiots and vets are scum.

That normals are subhumans whose role is to labor as serfs to subsidize the progressive elite and its clients.

That you should die to make way for the New Progressive Man/Woman/Other.

Dichotomic Dumbfuckery Award

Show post

Dennis Prager #fundie townhall.com

Source of Human Rights
Left: government
Right: the Creator

Human Nature
Left: basically good (Therefore, society is primarily responsible for evil.)
Right: not basically good (Therefore, the individual is primarily responsible for evil.)

Economic Goal
Left: equality
Right: prosperity

Primary Role of the State
Left: increase and protect equality
Right: increase and protect liberty

Government
Left: as large as possible
Right: as small as possible

Family Ideal
Left: any loving unit of people
Right: a married father and mother, and children

Guiding Trinity
Left: race, gender and class
Right: liberty, In God We Trust and e pluribus unum

Good and Evil
Left: relative to individual and/or society
Right: based on universal absolutes

Humanity's Primary Division(s)
Left: rich and poor; strong and weak
Right: good and evil

Ideal Primary Identity of an American
Left: world citizen
Right: American citizen

How to Make a Good Society
Left: abolish inequality
Right: develop each citizen's moral character

View of America
Left: profoundly morally flawed; inferior to any number of European countries
Right: greatest force for good among nations in world history

Gender
Left: a social construct
Right: male and female

Most Important Trait to Cultivate in a Child
Left: self-esteem
Right: self-control

Worth of the Human Fetus
Left: determined by the mother
Right: determined by society rooted in Judeo-Christian values

Primary Source of Crime
Left: poverty, racism and other societal flaws
Right: the criminal's malfunctioning conscience

Place of God and Religion in America
Left: secular government and secular society
Right: secular government and religious society

American Exceptionalism
Left: chauvinistic doctrine
Right: historical reality

Greatest Threat to the World
Left: environmental catastrophe (currently global warming)
Right: evil (currently radical Islamist violence)

International Ideal
Left: world governed by the United Nations, and no single country is dominant
Right: world in which America is the single strongest entity

Primary Reason for Lack of Peace in Middle East
Left: Israeli settlements in the West Bank
Right: Palestinian, Arab and Muslim denial of Jewish state's right to exist

Purpose of Art
Left: challenge status quo and bourgeois sensibilities
Right: produce works of beauty and profundity to elevate the individual and society

Guns
Left: ideally universally abolished, except for use by police, the armed forces and registered sportsmen
Right: ideally widely owned by responsible individuals for self-protection and the protection of others

Race
Left: intrinsically significant
Right: intrinsically insignificant

Racial, Ethnic and Gender Diversity at Universities
Left: most important
Right: far less important than ideological diversity

Black America's Primary Problem
Left: racism
Right: lack of fathers

Greatest Playwright
Left: entirely subjective; there is no greatest playwright
Right: Shakespeare

War
Left: not the answer
Right: sometimes the only answer

Hate
Left: wrong, except when directed at the political
Right: wrong, except when directed at evil

Cultures
Left: all equal
Right: some are better than others

America's Founding Fathers
Left: rich white male slave owners
Right: great men who founded the greatest society

Purpose of Judges
Left: pursue social justice
Right: pursue justice

National Borders
Left: a relic of the past
Right: indispensable for national survival

View of Illegal Immigrants
Left: welcomed guests
Right: illegal immigrants

Nature
Left: intrinsically valuable
Right: made for man

Show post

Ryan Anderson #fundie townhall.com

Last week many of us were disgusted to learn Planned Parenthood is harvesting and selling body parts from aborted children. As the largest provider of abortion in America, Planned Parenthood is part of the problem, on the “supply” side. But as we all learned in Econ 101, there’s both supply and demand. What’s behind the demand for abortion? A major factor is the breakdown of the family. And the Supreme Court’s ruling to redefine marriage is only taking us further down that road, putting even more unborn children at risk. After all redefining marriage redefines parenthood.

The best protectors of unborn children are a strong marriage culture and people who take the virtue of chastity seriously. But the new consent-based view of marriage reduces marriage to a mere contract and it makes a culture of chastity harder to foster. And, as I explain in my new book, without a culture of chastity, we will never have a pro-life culture.

Indeed, both the pro-choice movement and the movement to redefine marriage reduce human community to contract and consent and limit our obligations to other human beings to those we have freely chosen. Consider their slogans: “My body, my choice.” “I consented to sex, not to having a baby!” “Love makes a marriage.” “Marriage should last as long as the love lasts.” They all reflect the belief that consenting adults should do whatever they want to do, a belief that puts adult desire before the needs of children. And weakening marriage will lead to a culture with more nonmarital sex, thus more nonmarital pregnancy, and sadly more abortion.

Redefining marriage will also increase the use of assisted reproductive technologies. The movement to redefine marriage insists that there are “no differences” between the marital union of husband and wife and the union of two people of the same sex, yet a same-sex couple cannot conceive a child naturally. To achieve full “marriage equality,” then, it will be necessary to turn to modern technology. Same-sex couples must use assisted reproductive technologies—with the assistance of sperm donors, egg donors, surrogate wombs, etc.—so they can “have children of their own.”

Show post

Micheal Brown #fundie townhall.com

Either way, what (Obama) fails to realize is that there are plenty of former homosexuals, some of whom are no longer same-sex attracted, some of whom have seen a great reduction in those attractions, and others of whom have broken free from homosexual relationships and are very happy with the present state of their lives, despite being same-sex attracted.

I know quite a few of them personally, I have watched some of their lives for years, and they are fulfilled, whole, healthy, and joyful people – and a good number of them received great help through professional counseling.

How dare the president of the United States seek to forbid young people from receiving such positive counseling. And remember: We’re talking about counseling they want to receive, not counseling they are being forced to receive.

It is well-known that many of those who identify as homosexual and bisexual were sexually abused as children, and sometimes, they can trace their gay or bisexual feelings back to that abuse.

Yet the president wants to tell a child who has been sexually abused, who is now dealing with unwanted same-sex attractions, who for any number of reasons – social, spiritual, moral, familial – is not happy with those attractions, that it is illegal for that boy or girl, even at 17-years-old, to receive professional counseling.

This is outrageous and represents an extraordinary example of improper government overreach.

Show post

Perfect5th #fundie townhall.com

When the prevaricator in chief says "America's God given bounty", he must mean "allah", which leads the prevaricator to think it is ok to subvert a Christian nation to turn the 'bounty' (should be read BOOTY) over to Muslims.. whom his god allah meant it for.

I'm finding it difficult to love this person Lord, please help me to maintain a proper respect for you and your judgment, the shadow of which falls upon us all, as I try to come to grips with this corrupt and wicked administration and its key players.

Show post

John Hawkins #fundie townhall.com

20 Reasons You Wouldn't Want To Live In An America Controlled By Liberals Like Obama

The only thing more disturbing than the arrogance, incompetence, and lawlessness of Barack Obama's administration is that most liberals are perfectly fine with everything he's doing. It's shocking that there are so many Americans who don't care about the Constitution, the rule of law, or even what happens to the country just as long as someone they agree with ideologically is in charge. In fact, the only time liberals seem to get really upset these days is if someone criticizes Barack Obama or tries to put ANY KIND of restraint on his power. Want to know how America would look if liberals like Barack Obama had complete control of the country?

1) Abortion would be the only "choice." Almost everything else including light bulbs, TVs, health care plans, cars, and the schools your child goes to would be chosen for you by people in D.C.

2) You could be sued for failing to warn people that you are about to say something that could conceivably be offensive to women, gays, transsexuals, or minorities.

3) Every sports fan of teams like the Redskins, Braves, Chiefs, Indians, Blackhawks, and Seminoles would be branded as a bigot and all of those teams would be forced to change their names.

4) We would have open borders and anyone who walks across would be welcome to sign up as a citizen and collect welfare, food stamps, and Social Security.

5) It would be illegal to say the Pledge of Allegiance or fly an American flag because it might "offend people."

6) All criticism of black and Hispanic politicians would be shrugged off and treated as racism.

7) Government investigations of liberal wrongdoing would be handled by friends, associates, or campaign contributors of the liberal being charged.

8) So many nuclear and coal plants would be shut down that we'd end up with regularly scheduled blackouts in many parts of the country.

9) Anyone could choose not to work and get a monthly stipend from the state -- well, until the money runs out.

10) Cities, states, and even well-connected big businesses that spend irresponsibly and go broke could always be bailed out by the federal government.

11) Women would have to get mandatory abortion counseling from Planned Parenthood before giving birth just to make sure they are ready to have a child.

12) Conservative talk radio, blogs, websites and especially Fox News would be regulated out of existence and only government-approved media sources would be allowed.

13) Christians and conservatives would have to hide their beliefs to get government jobs.

14) The IRS would be allowed to audit people solely for contributing to conservative candidates or being a member of conservative groups.

15) Men who have sex with women who are drinking would be treated as rapists by default.

16) Merit and even basic competence would be secondary in importance to hiring people who are the right race or sex for a job.

17) Any child who plays with a toy gun would be considered a potential psychopath and expelled from school.

18) Americans would only be allowed to buy tiny, overpriced electric cars that don't work very well.

19) It would be illegal to oppose gay marriage.

20) Guns would be confiscated from everyone except the criminals, the cops, the military, and the bodyguards for rich liberals.

Show post

JMcCarthy #fundie townhall.com

Under the Communist 'democrats' the ONLY Sin is HAVING MORALS! Everyone is now "required" to ACCEPT, under penalty of law and/or Media HARASSMENT (Paula Dean), every Perversion the democrats come up with...Pro death (abortion), Poverty, out of wedlock births, atheism (preferred by democrats), homosexuality, same sex marriage, destruction of the core Black Family, generational welfare! What do democrats find offensive: the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Capitalism, People WITH Morals and/or Christian values, and ANYBODY who DISAGREES with them!

Show post

Pat Buchanan #racist townhall.com

Should Christians, Muslims, Mormons who refuse, on religious grounds, to serve same-sex couples -- that photographer, that florist, that baker, for example -- be treated as criminals?

Or should Arizona leave them alone?

"Religious freedom," said Daniel Mach of the ACLU to the Times, is "not a blank check to ... impose our faith on our neighbors."

True. But who is imposing whose beliefs here?

The baker who says he's not making your wedding cake? Or those who want Arizona law to declare that either he provides that wedding cake and those flowers for that same-sex ceremony, or we see to it that he is arrested, prosecuted and put out of business?

Who is imposing his views and values here?

What we are seeing in Arizona in microcosm is what we have witnessed in America for half a century: the growing intolerance of those who preach tolerance and the corruption of the concept of civil rights.

We have seen the progression before.

In 1954, the Supreme Court declared that segregation in public schools was wrong and every black child must be allowed to attend his or her neighborhood school. By 1968, the court was demanding that white children be forcibly bussed across entire cities to insure an arbitrary racial balance.

Under the civil rights acts of the 1960s, businesses were told that in hiring, promotion, pay, and benefits, black and white, men and women must be treated alike. Equality of opportunity.

But, soon, that was no longer enough. We needed equality of result.

[...]

Virtually all decisions to hire, fire, promote or punish employees, to oversee the sale and rental of housing, to ensure that all minorities have access to all restaurants, hotels and motels, are under the jurisdiction of these minions who are right out of Orwell's "1984."

Scores of thousands of bureaucrats -- academic, corporate, government -- are on watch, overseeing our economy, patrolling our society, monitoring our behavior.

A radical idea: Suppose we repealed the civil rights laws and fired all the bureaucrats enforcing these laws.

Does anyone think hotels, motels and restaurants across Dixie, from D.C. to Texas, would stop serving black customers? Does anyone think there would again be signs sprouting up reading "whites" and "colored" on drinking foundations and restrooms?

Does anyone think restrictive covenants against Jews would be rewritten into contracts on houses? Does anything think that bars and hotels would stop serving blacks and Hispanics?

[...]

Cannot a free people deal with social misconduct with social sanctions?

And isn't this what freedom is all about? The freedom of others to say things we disagree with, to publish ideas we disbelieve in, even to engage in behavior we dislike?

[...]

Last year, the Supreme Court struck down the preclearance provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Yet, somehow, Mississippi still has more black elected officials than any other state.

If the conditions that called for the laws of the 1960s have ceased to exist, why do those laws still exist?

Show post

Corbett #fundie townhall.com

[RE. the Arizona bill that would allow businesses to refuse service to LGBT people.]

I wonder how many of these people who believe that the government should force people to work for homosexuals realize that they are supporting slavery? After all, they are supporting involuntary servitude.

Show post

Tionico #fundie townhall.com

[Discussion on buying your sweetheart a gun for Valentine's Day]

left-lib "men" are generally wussies anyway, and so would be afraid of anyone with the means to put them in their place. Any assertive woman would likely give them the willies.

Just think, though... if the conservatives tend to arm and train our women, and the "other guys" tend to fear both the arms and the women who carry them, guess which "class" will increase over time? Particularly as things get "rough" as they seem to be likely to do. What was that business Darwin wrote about? No, not the whacked out one he later recanted, the other one.. somethjing about natural selection?

Show post

John Hawkins #fundie townhall.com

There may be no official rule book for being a liberal, but that doesn't mean there aren't rules. There are actually quite a few rules liberals go by and the more politically active liberals become, the more rigidly they tend to stick to their own code of behavior. These rules, most of which are unspoken, are passed along culturally on the Left and viciously enforced. Ironically, many liberals could not explain these rules to you and don't even consciously know they're following them. So, by reading this article, not only will you gain a better understanding of liberals, you'll know them better than they know themselves in some ways.

1) You justify your beliefs about yourself by your status as a liberal, not your deeds. The most sexist liberal can think of himself as a feminist while the greediest liberal can think of himself as generous. This is because liberals define themselves as being compassionate, open minded, kind, pro-science and intelligent not based on their actions or achievements, but based on their ideology. This is one of the most psychologically appealing aspects of liberalism because it allows you to be an awful person while still thinking of yourself as better than everyone else.

2) You exempt yourself from your attacks on America: Ever notice that liberals don't include themselves in their attacks on America? When they say, "This is a racist country," or ",This is a mean country," they certainly aren't referring to themselves or people who hold their views. Even though liberals supported the KKK, slaughtering the Indians, and putting the Japanese in internment camps, when they criticize those things, it's meant as an attack on everyone else EXCEPT LIBERALS. The only thing a liberal believes he can truly do wrong is to be insufficiently liberal.

3) What liberals like should be mandatory and what they don't like should be banned: There's an almost instinctual form of fascism that runs through most liberals. It's not enough for liberals to love gay marriage; everyone must be forced to love gay marriage. It's not enough for liberals to be afraid of guns; guns have to be banned. It's not enough for liberals to want to use energy-saving light bulbs; incandescent light bulbs must be banned. It's not enough for liberals to make sure most speakers on campuses are left-wing; conservative speakers must be shouted down or blocked from speaking.

4) The past is always inferior to the present: Liberals tend to view traditions, policies, and morals of past generations as arbitrary designs put in place by less enlightened people. Because of this, liberals don't pay much attention to why traditions developed or wonder about possible ramifications of their social engineering. It’s like an architect ripping out the foundation of a house without questioning the consequences and if the living room falls in on itself as a result, he concludes that means he needs to make even more changes.

5) Liberalism is a jealous god and no other God may come before it: A liberal "Christian" or "Jew" is almost an oxymoron because liberalism trumps faith for liberals. Taking your religious beliefs seriously means drawing hard lines about right and wrong and that's simply not allowed. Liberals demand that even God bow down on the altar of liberalism.

Show post

John Hawkins #fundie townhall.com

I'd like to suggest some ways that we conservatives can stop being such selfish ogres and give those on the Left exactly what they want and much more importantly, what they deserve.

So, in the generous spirit of bipartisanship, here are ten ways that we can give liberals exactly what they SAY they want.

1) There are far too many people in our prisons who have been failed by our society. That certainly isn't their fault. That's why we need to release a few million prisoners into halfway houses in liberal neighborhoods.

2) America needs to lead the way in alternative energy; so it should be illegal for liberals to power their homes with anything other than windmills and solar energy. On the upside, since this will mean a lot of time in the dark, these liberals will gain the added bonus of being able to get back to nature.

3) Bodyguards for liberal politicians, celebrities, and athletes shouldn't be able to use guns. After all, people don't kill people; guns kill people -- so by removing the guns from those bodyguards, those people will be safer than ever!

4) We do need to make sure that everyone gets a "working wage." So, let's raise the minimum wage to $100 an hour. We can start by raising the salaries of chauffeurs, gardeners, nannies, cooks, and maids in Hollywood and expand from there until we all make at least $100 an hour and will thus, be rich! But wait....if we were all rich, then we'd all be exploitive and evil....ah, that's something to figure out in the next column.

5) We do need to bring illegal aliens "out of the shadows," which is why any illegal aliens captured in America who aren’t immediately deported should be shipped to Berkeley or San Francisco, where they can live in peace, use the schools, and collect government benefits until their trials...well, if they show up for their trials.

6) Union labor is important, which is why liberal businesses should be legally obligated to ONLY use unionized labor. Granted, that might mean long delays, their competitors dramatically undercutting them on costs, or even going out of business, but wouldn't that be worth it for those people if they got to put more money in the pockets of union members?

7) Fairness is very important. That's why we need to apply the Fairness Doctrine to newspaper editorial pages, MSNBC, Current TV, and the Huffington Post.

8) We all know animals (and trees) should have the same rights as human beings; so is it really worth it to save human lives if animals have suffered to make it possible? That's why it should be illegal to sell liberals insulin, antibiotics, drugs that fight AIDS/HIV and any other medicines that were made possible by testing that was done on animals.

9) Let's put salary caps in place to keep rich guys from earning money that they don't deserve. How about a maximum of $100,000 for any actor's appearance in a film? That seems fair, right? Wouldn't you agree to star in a major motion picture for $100,000?

10) Increasing diversity is an important goal; so we should set quotas to insure that every newspaper staff in America (and we can't forget MSNBC) have as many minorities present as there are in the population. It would also be nice if Netroots Nation wasn't as white as a snowstorm in Maine; so maybe next year some of those white, liberal attendees could give up their tickets to people of color.

Show post

tibby2 #fundie townhall.com

National holidays are established based on something. We have one in January celebrating the birthday of a civil rights leader. In February we have a national holiday celebrating the birthdays of two presidents. In May we remember those who have fallen in service of this country. In July we celebrate the birth of a nation. In September we commemorate the labor movement and Veterans are honored in November. Each national holiday is for a specific reason.

We are told by the secular folks that December 25th is not a celebration about a religious figure. If not, then what does it celebrate? If that religious figure had never existed what would be the reason for the celebration? Why would it be a national holiday? If Jesus (pronounced “hay-zoose”) had never existed then there would be no December 25th celebration called Christmas (or Xmas if you prefer)

Yea, I did leave the one out in November but that history also involves some religious stuff and thanking someone whom the secular humanist, atheistic folks say doesn’t exist. Perhaps they should thank the government for their welfare check or Obamacare.

Liberals believe in separation of church and state unless government will pay you overtime pay on those religious oriented holidays. (Another one of those “inconvenient truths”)

Show post

Katie Kiefer #fundie townhall.com

Rand may have been an atheist, but she embraced reason and natural law. Christians must do likewise. As Aquinas writes, if Christians embrace laws that violate reason and natural law, such as wealth redistribution mandates, they are in fact embracing injustice.

When Rand’s hero, John Galt, explains justice, he does so in a manner that is consistent with Aristotle, Aquinas and the biblical definition justice—in relation to objective truth and goodness: “Justice is the recognition of the fact that… just as you do not pay a higher price for a rusty chunk of scrap than for a piece of shining metal, so you do not value a rotter above a hero—that your moral appraisal is the coin paying men for their virtues or vices, and this payment demands of you as scrupulous an honor as you bring to financial transactions…”

I think Christians should avoid rushing to judgment on Rand’s philosophy because, at core, she has much to say about living with integrity and pursuing true happiness. No matter what term a pastor uses (think “social justice”), socialism is neither ethical nor Christian. Next week I will delve deeper into explaining how Rand’s beliefs are compatible with Christianity.

Show post

Truckman #fundie townhall.com

Do you know why "young people" (Liberal ones,anyway) support homosexual marriage and homosexual "rights"? Because thanks to Liberals' total lack or principles,morals and family values,God has been cast out of Schools,the Government,the Military,and the FAMILY. Do some research,notice that all these ungodly things became prevalent just about the time Democrats,and the ACLU,began protesting everything related to God,forcing politicians to create unconstitutional laws against people's right to publicly acknowledge the FACT that a younger America's success for over 200 years has been,in large part,because of God's influence. But Liberals have systematically taken God away from Society and created an America that can't possibly succeed. Thanks for killing the United States of America. God help America!

Show post

Michelle Malkin #racist townhall.com

[Malkin defends Jason Richwine's dissertation which asserted that Hispanics have lower IQs than whites.]

The Crucifixion of Jason Richwine

How low will supporters of the Gang of Eight immigration bill go to get their way? This low: They've shamelessly branded an accomplished Ivy League-trained quantitative analyst a "racist" and will stop at nothing to destroy his career as they pave their legislative path to another massive illegal alien benefits bonanza.

Jason Richwine works for the conservative Heritage Foundation. He's a Harvard University Ph.D. who co-authored a study that pegs the cost of the Ted Kennedy Memorial Open Borders Act 2.0 legislation at $6.3 trillion. Lead author Robert Rector is a senior research fellow at Heritage, a former United States Office of Personnel Management analyst and the intellectual godfather of welfare reform. He holds a master's degree in political science from Johns Hopkins University.

[...]

Richwine's 166-page dissertation, "IQ and Immigration Policy," is now being used to smear him -- and, by extension, all of Heritage's scholarship -- as "racist." While the punditocracy and political establishment sanctimoniously call for "honest discussions" on race, they rush to crush bona fide, dispassionate academic inquiries into the controversial subjects of intelligence, racial and ethnic differences, and domestic policy.

[...]

Part One reviews the science of IQ. Part Two delves into empirical research comparing IQs of the native-born American population with that of immigrant groups, with the Hispanic population broken out. Richwine explores the causes of an immigrant IQ deficit that appears to persist among Hispanic immigrants to the U.S. through several generations.

The thesis analyzes social policy consequences of these findings and uses a model of the labor market "to show how immigrant IQ affects the economic surplus accruing to natives and the wage impact on low-skill natives."

[...]

The willingness of Republican Gang of 8'ers to allow a young conservative researcher and married father of two to be strung up by the p.c. lynch mob for the crime of unflinching social science research is chilling, sickening and suicidal.

These are serious people doing serious work. The crucifiers of Jason Richwine pretend to defend sound science. But if it is now inherently racist to study racial and ethnic differences among demographic groups, then it's time to shut down every social sciences department in the country.

Show post

Moonbat Exterminator #fundie townhall.com

*On the "Gang of Ocho's" attacks against Jason Richwine*

A conservative scholar is being pilloried by the left propoganda machine? Well, raise my rent! Richwine certainly should have known that any published paper that deviates even slightly from the liberal hegemony will cause the author to be excoriated. I don't know about Ms Malkin, but I'd be more shocked if the left ever responds with rational arguement instead of going for the jugular, then the family jewels. The bottom line is that the only way the left knows how to play is dirty, so we should expect nothing else from them.

Show post

Matt Barber #fundie townhall.com

“Gay pride” necessitates anti-Christian hate. It must. “Gay marriage” and other “sexual orientation”-based laws do violence to freedom and truth. They are the hammer with which the postmodern left intends to bludgeon bloody religious liberty and the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic.

Show post

Carl469 #racist townhall.com

Latinos, like blacks, love the welfare state. A free lunch is what they seek. And Democrats serve the largest portions. We'll get nowhere desperately trying to impress the Democrats with our newfound commitment to "diversity." Whites, and only whites, are the key to our success. Don't be bashful or apologetic. There's simply no other way to win.

Show post

Marie150 #fundie townhall.com

And RADICALS are deceived. The deceived are ignorant. They want chaos. They want revolution. Because they are blinded with evil. And evil is always dumb. Satan is an idiot.

God is wise. God is good. God established order. God gave us rules for our benefit. God sent us a Savior because we are deceived and therefor not good. Only good can stand before God. Jesus stands with those He has saved.

Show post

DockyWocky #fundie townhall.com

Speaking of buffoons, I heard that the Great Obama plans on hosting a display of Chistian godlessness as he will perform a "MOMENT OF SILENCE" later this afternoon in front of the nation and world.

What? Is he afraid to mention the word "PRAYER?" Perhaps there is no equivalent non-ceremony in the religion of peace and the Grand Prevaricator will continue to pretend he is an actual Christian.

Show post

wade #fundie townhall.com

You know another gross thing I learned when I got older is that there really are Boogey Men. When I was a kid and it was getting dark outside we'd sometimes say to our friends "You better get home the boogy-man will get you!" We'd laugh and say there was no such thing.

The origin of the boogy man phrase stems from the distortion of the old word that described the homo. lifestyle as "buggary". Those men that engaged in buggary looked for male children like Mohammed the prophet did. Hence the boogey man will get you!

Show post

Mike Adams #fundie townhall.com

Over the summer, I was convicted of anti-gay hate speech. The most incredible thing about it was that I never set foot in Canada. The conviction happened while I was in Colorado. But the offense took place almost 15 years ago.

In the 1990s, a friend of mine announced that he was divorcing his wife because he had decided (after a couple of unhappy marriages) to pursue the gay lifestyle. My decision to support him was born out of ignorance. Not only was I harboring the illusion that there actually was such a thing as a gay gene. I was also ignorant of the fact that gays could be successfully cured through therapeutic efforts.

My decision to label my own verbal support of his lifestyle choice as “hate speech” makes sense only after one becomes educated about that lifestyle. According to the Centers for Disease Control, over 82% of all known sexually-transmitted HIV cases in 2006 were the result of male-to-male sexual contact. Moreover, gay and bisexual men account for over 60% of all syphilis cases.

Some will say that homophobia is the indirect cause of such numbers. They claim that fear of stigmatization keeps gays from seeking information before they become ill and from seeking medical help afterwards. But, clearly, that is not the case. In cultures where homosexuality is more accepted the numbers are worse. That is why I steadfastly maintain that supporting my friend’s decision to turn to the homosexual lifestyle was indeed an example of hate speech.

Most gays become angry when someone tells the truth about the health consequences of their lifestyle choice. The reason they get angry over the facts is because their conscience convicts them. When I came to realize that I helped make it easier for my friend to pursue his unhealthy lifestyle my conscience was convicted. I have regretted my verbal support of his decision ever since.

No sane person could ever posit that the act of rectal sodomy is safe, normal, or healthy. The rectum is a one-way street. It is a sewer meant for the expulsion of poison. Treating the rectum as a sex organ is damaging to the health – especially for the recipient of such abuse. That is why it is an act of hate, regardless of whether some choose to call it “love.”

Show post

Phyllis Schlafly #fundie townhall.com

Knowledge of our Declaration of Independence should be required of all schoolchildren. They should also be taught that many of the 56 men who signed it then paid for their courage with their lives and fortunes, and that's why we are able to enjoy our freedom and independence today.

It is dishonest for schools to ignore our nation's Judeo-Christian heritage. It is historical fact that our Founding Fathers were men of faith who took their Christian religion seriously, were well-schooled in the Bible, and believed that religion and morality are the foundation of good government.

Fortunately, the declaration is not subject to amendment or to whims and biases of supremacist judges who may claim it is a "living" Declaration that can be reinterpreted. It's important for Americans to be on guard against those who don't like our Declaration of Independence or are in denial about what it says.

The message of the Declaration of Independence is under attack from the ACLU and atheists because it refuted the lie about a constitutional mandate for "separation of church and state." Atheists have filed numerous lawsuits in the courts of activist judges to try to eliminate our right to acknowledge God in public places, in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and in Ten Commandments monuments.

The atheists are trying to change American history, expunge all reference to religion from textbooks and make us a completely secular nation. History proves America was founded by religious men who believed that a divine Creator is basic to good government.

We get the impression that President Obama is embarrassed not only about references to God, but also by the concept of independence, which asserts our national sovereignty. He's more comfortable bowing to foreign dictators, declaring himself a "citizen of the world" and pledging to "rejoin the world community," as he did when speaking to cheering German socialists.

Show post

Phyllis Schlafly #fundie townhall.com

Coakley insulted people with religious values by declaring that those who oppose abortion probably shouldn't work in emergency rooms because an occasional patient might demand an immediate abortion. Feminists refuse to allow respect for a right of conscience because that might get in the way of their ideology that abortion is women's premier right.

Feminists pretend they want all laws and behavior to be gender-neutral, with identical treatment of male and female (and other genders, whatever they are). But when it comes to domestic violence and child abuse, feminist ideology decrees that men are naturally batterers and women never lie so they don't have to present evidence in order to convict a man.

Show post

Dennis Prager #sexist townhall.com

It is an axiom of contemporary marital life that if a wife is not in the mood, she need not have sex with her husband. Here are some arguments why a woman who loves her husband might want to rethink this axiom.
[...]
Compared to most womens sexual nature, mens sexual nature is far closer to that of animals. So what? That is the way he is made. Blame God and nature. Telling your husband to control it is a fine idea. But he already does. Every man who is sexually faithful to his wife already engages in daily heroic self-control. He has married knowing he will have to deny his sexual natures desire for variety for the rest of his life. To ask that he also regularly deny himself sex with the one woman in the world with whom he is permitted sex is asking far too much. Deny him enough times and he may try to fill this need with another woman.

Show post

Chuck Norris #fundie townhall.com

Lastly, as we near the eve of another Christmas, I wonder: What would have happened if Mother Mary had been covered by Obamacare? What if that young, poor and uninsured teenage woman had been provided the federal funds (via Obamacare) and facilities (via Planned Parenthood, etc.) to avoid the ridicule, ostracizing, persecution and possible stoning because of her out-of-wedlock pregnancy? Imagine all the great souls who could have been erased from history and the influence of mankind if their parents had been as progressive as Washington's wise men and women! Will Obamacare morph into Herodcare for the unborn?

Show post

Tommy #fundie townhall.com

[Re: The old "gays can't reproduce, so they can't marry" argument:]

Fred: So what do you call the union of a couple of 70 year old's who can't have children?

Tommy: Biologically still possible, Fred. Two dïcks? two vaginas? Can't happen in a billion years. That's the diff.

Show post

Brian #fundie townhall.com

Rein in your idiots, gay activists
Don't push this too far, gay men. There's a reason why gay men were brutally repressed in every society until the Western Societies of the past 20 years -- the potential forces of violence arrayed against you are infinitely greater than anything you can muster.

Everything you enjoy now is "dependent on the kindness of strangers" Stay tolerant to get tolerance. You may have pushed things as far as they can go. If so, live with it. If you break down religion you may also break down the institutions that restrain violence being visited on you.

Show post

Ann Coulter #fundie townhall.com

The ethic of conservation is the explicit abnegation of man's dominion over the Earth. The lower species are here for our use. God said so: Go forth, be fruitful, multiply, and rape the planet -- it's yours. That's our job: drilling, mining and stripping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars -- that's the Biblical view. Producing oil isn't so bad for the environment anyway. During World War II, our boats were going at breakneck speed to get oil to England (what with the war and all). There were oil spills everywhere. Half the beaches in the United States were slathered in oil. Six weeks later all the birds were back.

Show post

Kevin McCullough #fundie townhall.com

While President Obama was in Cairo preaching Islamist propaganda to the ears of Muslim students this last week, his administration was carrying out an even more sinister agenda. While he was willfully misleading the television audience as to the "tolerance" that Islam allows, he quietly nominated a man who teaches students to hate parents. While President Obama seemingly praised the earliest traces of recognition of Sharia law on U.S. soil (women being subjugated into wearing hajibs even in America), he stealthily put forward a nominee who refused to report a sexual relationship where a man was molesting a school age boy, even though the law required him to do so.

To call Obama's plan this last week to nominate Kevin Jennings to the Department of Education dishonest, while he himself was spreading factually incorrect information himself to an Islamist audience and the enemies concealed therein some sort of deception times two, would be like calling the pacific ocean a puddle, NBC's Brian Williams a kiss up, or the new national 9.4% unemployment a hiccup...

Show post

St. Denis in Obama's Red America #fundie townhall.com

I have two young sons and I will sue the mf that teaches either of them about homosexuality. They are too young to learn about sex and I should have some rights as a parent.

What do you think about the school in San Francisco that wants to use a book about a gay penguin couple in kindergarten book and does not want to allow parents the right to opt out.

5 year olds learning about homosexuality is obscene. 5 year olds learning about sex period is obscene.

Ya happy? They are both obscene.