“The term "creationist" is commonly used as an anti-science label by proponents of evolutionism.”
Proponents of evolutionism is a prolix way of saying ‘everyone.’
Creationists also use the term and usually during anti-science posts.
“Both "evolutionist" and "evolutionism" refer to scientists and others who accept that the atheistic-based religious belief”
See, this is an anti-science stance, calling the science ‘a religion.’
"because if they don't subscribe they are blacklisted”
Well, yeah. If scientists don’t accept the science, they shouldn’t be respected as respectable scientists.
“marginalized,”
DO they WANT to be considered mainstream if they reject the science?
“and often fired”
Same as when they fire anti-vax nurses/doctors.
Or like when my LPO in the Fire Control Division went conscientious objector. They don’t let CO’s program nuclear weapons.
“To compound this stupidity some evolutionists even argue that "creation" is a fairytale religion”
Um, yeah?
“taking away "sexual freedom" and other supposed benefits of present day society.”
That’s gotta be your issue. it’s enough for us that it’s not falsifiable, therefore not science.
“This while believing in an exploding dot and random chance to arrive at all of the complexities known and unknown”
And the fallacy of argument-from-complexity.
“ All in all, this represents mainly a bunch of atheistic garbage.”
Except you don’t have to be an atheist to accept, grasp, or teach evolution.