That's alright. I fixed the tags.
By JQ, I assume the anti-semite Nazi means “Jewish Question?”
And by “critical thinking,” I assume they mean “pointless contrariness?”
Because the crux of critical thinking is not the part where you disagree with normal people. It's where you have some experiment that actually allows you to distinguish between information and crap.
Like, in the case of recognizing if a mushroom is poison, you might just do what the other people are doing, on the safe assumption that if it hasn't killed them yet then it won't kill you. Alternatively, you might perform a chemical test, though such a test is itself probably based on cataloging which things killed the test subjects and which didn't. The former is how I evaluate stuff like the so-called “Jewish Question,” the latter corresponds to what historians do. The latter is cooler, but it's more perilous, and it involves digging in the dirt and learning dead languages. You can't just read web pages and expect to be able to rewrite history.