new

[10/6/2006]

So for this reason, I have no more interest in conversing with atheists here until they understand basic concepts like those above. Nor am I interested in playing verbal volleyball. But since that's the only thing atheists understand, I'll leave you to do that all by yourselves.

[10/4/2006]

So either way, since lies and fantasies aren't real, then neither is evolution. But it's pointless to converse with people whose beliefs are based on lying. And since lies aren't the truth, then we have made our case against evolution. So I have no more desire to listen to people who pass on nothing but lies. That's a complete waste of my time.

[9/1/2006]

So since you don't listen to us nor can you see your own contradictions, then it's futile to argue with atheists. Since we Christians have lived both with and without the Holy Spirit, we can see which one is better. But since atheists don't understand that either, then it's another waste of time trying to explain it to you. That's like claiming that a student in arithmetic knows better than a professor of mathematics about math. Therefore, unless you open your minds, you will keep them bolted shut and have to find out for yourselves the hard way what the price for rejecting God will be. God knows you don't listen to us.

[9/1/2006]

It is obvious then that most evolutionists aren't interested in being honest, just rebelling against Christians, and so far, they're not doing a very good job of it because evasions and attacks don't prove their case. So for now, I'll leave you to your contradictions and evasions. They waste the time of others and more importantly, they waste your time because they bring you no closer to the truth.

[8/25/2006]

Atheists admit they have no clue what the truth is. So why should we listen to them? The answer is that we shouldn't listen to people who are confused about what is right and wrong, true or false, and what is real and what isn't real. One cannot learn from people who are that confused, least of all people who claim that something is true just because they say so even though their beliefs can't be documented by any outside reality.

[8/21/2006]

But the beliefs of atheists not only can't be established by any facts, but their contradictions are endless and bizarre. It does no good to try to have a rational conversation with people who are this confused about what's true and what's false.

[8/20/2006]

So I won't be spending much time arguing with you because you're not interested in understanding the bible. I'll post a few posts here and there in case there's even one person who has a genuine curiosity about God, not just seeing if he can outsmart him. Of course that won't happen...

[8/10/2006]

It does no good to present any more evidence to people who deny it. That's like people presenting evidence that Caesar existed and me denying it. There's no way to reach people whose eyes are that blinded.

[6/27/2006]

Since atheists here resist finding God no matter how much they contradict themselves to do it, then who am I to stop them? I'm going on to forums where people have open minds and open hearts and aren't foolish enough to do everything in their power to make sure they have everlasting death. I'll pop back in from time to time to see if anyone understands what his soul is, before he can even begin to care about it. But I'm not holding my breath.

The theory of dinosaurs came along in the mid 1800's just before the time Darwin begain imagining the ape scenario. A young scientist envisioned an enormous creature in his mind and set about trying to find it. He was met with much skepticism and no real evidence until he found something that looked like a skull but he wasn't sure. So he set about trying to create a creature from that skull, all the while, his wife believing he was insane, which of course, he was, thus re-inforcing the phrase "mad scientist."

So after many years of gathering different bones, the dinosaur was created. Never mind that there's absolutely no way to know if those bones came from one animal or several animals. All that mattered was creating a fictitious monster out of any bones that were found and passing it aong as the truth so he can get his name in science books. Scientists even admit that some of the skeletons were "missing" so they added other bones from other animals to complete their design. This is not science. It's called; artwork. And it's very creative artwork at that! Some of those creatures are hilarious and any design is possible because there were no witnesses! But unfortunately, it's no different than kids finding sticks in the woods and creating anything they want from them. And most people see that as children's imaginations (which it is), but if those children had letters after their names, then people would claim they were "brilliant, just brilliant." And this is all palentologists do.

Then they assign each creature a name ( and the longer the better to show how intelligent they are but they more accurately describe the size of their egos than any real living creature) and decide which ones were herbivores, carnivores, or omnivores. So how can they know what these animals ate? :confused: The answer is that they can't know. They have simply made it up. And all they have to do is use the letters after their names and they can pass anything along as the truth. :)

So these fictitious beasts are in every science book in elementary school and passed along as facts instead of artwork. And people have been so brainwashed to believe them as facts, they can't see the forest through the trees that there's no way to prove them whatsoever. The various bones have all been positioned and glued together to depict the imagination fo the artist. There's no way to tell if these bones were all from the same animal or one animal. Even today, scientists have to extract DNA to see if the bones they find from a dead body all belong to the same person! So the one thing scientists have that is undeniable and that is an imagination. But it's hardly science. Palentologists would make more money working for Steven Spielberg than spending their times on hot deserts. ;)