new

[From "The Road to Zero Fertility"]

We have a new weird sexual thing to discuss.

A new reality series is sparking controversy with its promise to ‘skip the dating and go straight to the baby-making’.
Fox’s Labour of Love sees 15 men competing to impregnate a 41-year-old woman they have never met.
Kirsty Katzmann is the singleton hoping to bag herself a baby daddy on the never been done before series.
In last night’s debut episode, Kirsty introduced herself to the hopefuls as a professional and a divorcee from Chicago seeking to find the right man to have a child with.
After having no success on the dating scene, Kirsty said yes to the divisive premise because she felt her ‘biological clocking was ticking’ and wanted to achieve her dream of motherhood.
[...]

Let me tell you what is most offensive about this game show: the woman is 41-years-old, and they are talking about a “ticking clock.” In actual fact, she is virtually a finished clock. Many women at the age of 41 are simply incapable of getting pregnant and carrying a child to term, especially if it is their first. Others require tens of thousands of dollars of medical assistance. The statistics are difficult to parse out, given that there is a lot of political correctness involved, but everyone admits that the chance of experiencing every possible complication increases progressively every day after a girl turns 17.

By simply existing, this show advertises to women the idea that they can wait until they are in their forties to have children, which is just absolute cancer for society. The worst form of social cancer, in fact. The refusal of women to follow the order of nature – a refusal which stems naturally from giving them the choice – is the very heart of the collapse of the family and thus the very core of our social rot.

This game show woman explains that she is doing this quirky game show because she couldn’t find a good man on the dating scene. The reason for that is very simple: she is 41. Virtually no man of any quality at all, of any age, is going to be interested in a woman this old. That is just the harsh reality that these women have to face. They aren’t told this when they are young. Instead, they are told that men care about women’s education and life experience. Men might care about these things, but only in the sense that the less of these two things a woman has, the better. Even if you could find a high-quality man that was exclusively interested in women for their personalities (and it’s questionable than any such man exists), the fact is that the longer a woman remains unmarried, the more sexual partners she has, the more jaded and incapable of developing trust she becomes, and the worse her personality becomes.

A Happy Woman is a Baby Machine
Given that our society is controlled by satanic Jews who have an agenda to wipe out White Christians, anti-natal concepts flood every crevice of our bizarre and unnatural culture.

The modern anti-natalist lingo has continually pushed the claim that men think of women as “baby-making machines” and that this is morally wrong. However, “baby-making machines” is literally what women are, and the best among the crueler sex are happy to admit it, and take pride in it.

[...]
Modern society, with its birth control pills and abortion, and its feminist morality, encourages women to engage in the mating game well past the period of time in which they are naturally supposed to be doing it. It also constantly tells women that if they seek the second thing they want and are good at, children, then they will regret the loss of the first thing. Though she really does enjoy the mating game, it becomes progressively less enjoyable as she ages, in part because she becomes progressively less successful at it.

[...]
Virtually every mammal begins breeding as soon as it experiences its first menstruation, which is why women were typically sold off at this age. That biological fact tends to make people in our society very uncomfortable, as in the last century we’ve developed various taboos around an arbitrary age of female sexual readiness. That taboo is in itself not especially problematic. There is no reason women can’t wait until the arbitrary age of 16 to get married and have children. If that is what we were talking about, that would be fine.

But that is not what we are talking about. What we are talking about is waiting to the arbitrary age of 16 before the girl is considered available for so-called “consensual” pre-marital sex. The social acceptability of pre-marital sex is the first concession on the road to zero fertility.

A girl’s innocence is not truly lost when she loses her virginity. Her innocence is lost when she realizes that the man she lost her virginity to will not be her husband. She will shed a tear when her hymen breaks, but it is when she finds that her first will not also be her last that she weeps. Even today, I assume, most teenage girls imagine that they will marry their high school boyfriends. This is because in that state of innocence, she has not yet learned to become a slut.

Most Christian preachers will speak of “waiting until marriage” to have sex. Or, at least, they used to. Human biology, however, works differently than this. In the upper classes, it may have been possible to indoctrinate a girl into forcing a man to wait until marriage. And surely some lower class girls would be just that good. But in what is probably a majority of situations, going all the way back to the establishment of monogamous marriage for life as a fundamental institution for maintenance of the the stability of a complex society, teenagers had sex before marriage, the girl got pregnant and the marriage was then quickly arranged by the parents. I don’t know how these conversations would go, but you can easily imagine it. The marriage would happen quickly, the girl would wear a white dress and everyone would be too polite to do the math on the number of weeks between the wedding and the birth.

[...]
A teenage girl is told that she not only must wait until she finishes high school, but also college, and then have a job and work for some indeterminate amount of time. Basically, if we were now teaching “wait until marriage to have sex,” we would be telling women to wait until they are nearly a decade past prime fertility. This situation is utterly insane on its face, and it is unbelievable that Christians have accepted it unquestioningly.

If Christians truly believe that women should wait until marriage to have sex, and believe that the family is the foundational block of society, then literally every single sermon they give should be about the evils of sending women to college instead of marrying them off after high school. If churches were doing that, then we would have an established subculture in the West of conservative-minded people who were creating large, stable families. As the liberals failed to produce children, we would be the overwhelming majority of the population by now if every daughter of a Christian man was pumping out babies from the time she turned 16. But no, instead, preachers are talking about “prosperity gospel” and telling well-meaning people to serve the satanic Jews who murdered our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

When a girl knows that no path exists to marry the first boy, for which she felt feelings that she will never again feel for the rest of her life, driven by all of these hormones that are intended to create a bond during the teenage years, she gives up on the idea of maintaining her innocence. After the first few boys, she has become hardened to it, and has embraced the fun and the power of promiscuity. This is literally a system designed to break the basic psychological mechanisms that exist biologically in the brain of a female that drive her towards family formation. It is all promoted by the psychological warfare machine that is the media and educational establishment, both of which are totally dominated by the Jews.

[...]
Someone is going to be in control, and what modern women always demand is that they be the ones in control. It is only by refusing them that control that you will gain their respect. Of course, whatever respect you gain from a woman is fleeting and as long as a woman has the option of surviving without you, which all Western societies currently offer them, they will never respect or honor their husbands as the Bible commands them to – which is in total submission, just as a Christian man is in total submission to God. For a woman, submission to God takes the form of submission to her husband. This concept is spelled out without ambiguity throughout the Old and New Testament.

[Ephesian 5:22-23 urging wives to be submitted to their husbands]

Everyone is having a hard time. Families are the single most important thing to me, and I absolutely want men to have the best chances possible in forming their own families. I do believe that the coming troubles may give people much better opportunities on that front, so single men should be prepared. Of course, there is going to be a massive wave of divorces in the first stages of this collapse, when the government is still offering women money and various other incentives if they leave their husbands, which they are going to be desiring to do because their husbands will be out of work. But I do believe that the government will not, in the longer term, be able to provide very much for a woman, and in such a situation a man who is capable of providing will be in a position where he can demand the woman submit to him.

Across the world, there are various laws regulating the age at which a female can legally make the decision to have sex. The age is entirely arbitrary, and ranges from as low as 12 to as high as 19, depending on the location. Generally in the developed world, 16 is the accepted norm.

The fact that it fluctuates so much between locations goes to prove that it is without any biological basis. It is visibly evident that there is no biological difference between a girl of 15 years and 11 months and a girl of 16 years.

Making the situation even more ridiculous is the fact that a girl is indeed legally allowed to have sex with boys her own age or younger before she reaches the magic number. Thus it is that she is considered to be entirely capable of issuing consent to a man, it is simply that she is not capable of issuing consent to an older man.

The final layer of absurdity is that it is not the girl who is punished for engaging in the illicit act, but the man whom she has targeted to loose her wiles upon. What this creates is a situation where a girl can target a man for seduction, lie about her age, and get him locked up. Furthermore, governments can potentially entrap a man with a fully developed girl of 15 years and eleven months, sending her to seduce him and then arresting him on crimes against consent.

What exactly is this “consent,” which is so capable of being twisted into various shapes in order to criminalize men?

The legal definition of the term is this:

Voluntary Acquiescence to the proposal of another; the act or result of reaching an accord; a concurrence of minds; actual willingness that an act or an infringement of an interest shall occur.

So, in theory, a woman is incapable of acquiescing to a proposal of sex from a man – but only an older man – until she reaches the mature age of 16 (or whatever the age might be in your region).

The frightening thing is that the concept of “age of consent” assumes that there is ever any age at which a woman is capable of making informed and responsible decisions about something as serious as sexual activity.

However, in America, most adult women are fat. This means that as adults, they are incapable of making proper decisions about what they eat. But somehow we have reached the conclusion that they are capable of making decisions about their reproductive behaviors? This is absurd on the face of it.

As such, it is my view that the concept of consent must be abolished entirely, and women must be disallowed by law from engaging in sexual activity without the permission of a male relative or, if no male relative exists, the state.

The fact that we have the concept of an age of consent in our society means that it is acknowledged by society that there is a state in which a biologically fully developed female is incapable of deciding who she has sex with. And I am not aware of a single “my body, my choice” feminist who takes issue with this.

In other words, from the most staunch conservative to the most radical leftist, we all agree that a woman under the age of 16 is utterly infantile to the point of needing her biological functions restricted by men with guns. I do not see evidence that a woman ever exits this infantile state. In fact, it would appear that women become less capable of managing their lives as they age. A high school girl is generally much better behaved than a college girl, and a female who has graduated college is radically irresponsible. Women are so completely infantile that they will forego their childbearing potential by spending all of their most fertile years drinking, doing drugs and having “consensual” sex with a parade of different men. When the woman reaches thirty, and her looks have faded and she is alone, she will enter a state of confusion and begin blaming others for her unfortunate predicament. Women in their forties and fifties will then get divorces and utterly destroy the lives of every member of their families in order to pursue some type of vague “personal happiness” agenda. Women in their fifties and sixties begin engaging in bizarre and anti-social political activism which serves the sole purpose of harming society at large. It is not until her biology slows down her ability to move freely that a woman ever becomes less dangerous and destructive, less of an existential threat to society at large, less of a public nuisance, than she was at the age of 16.

With so-called “consent,” we have created a system where the completely unregulated sexual desires of women completely control all aspects of society. Women are able to give or deny consent on an industrial scale, and use this mechanism to completely control the behavior of men. They use this power granted them by the state to transform society into something which they apparently believe benefits them, but which does not bring a single objectively good thing to the people. Every outcome we have seen from giving women consent has been negative. We have only barren wombs, incels and broken families to show for embracing the imbecilic concept that a woman is capable of making responsible and informed sexual decisions.

Society does not benefit from women of any age being given sexual consent rights. Men do not benefit from it. Not even the women themselves benefit from it. Nothing good has come from giving women consent rights. The application of Consent Theory was a weird experiment and it failed, and it is time for the state to revoke these rights.

All female “rights” are given to them by men, as is clear by the simple fact that women are not capable of surviving without men, nor are they capable of physically overpowering men. Consent was a privilege given to women by men and it can and must be taken away just as easily. Applied Consent Theory is totally unsustainable due to the anti-natal results, and will eventually lead to a birthrate of zero. We cannot afford to continue to play this ridiculous game.

We need to replace the consent system with a system of strict regulation where the concept of consent is no longer considered. We can call this “no consent at any age.”

Furthermore, it is the woman who chooses to have sex, not the man. A man, particularly a young man, is virtually incapable of resisting sexual urges if a woman throws herself at him. So, it is the woman who should be punished for violating “no consent at any age” laws. Women who violate these rules and engage in unregulated sex need to be punished severely with lashings. A woman who repeatedly breaks consent laws and consents to unregulated sex must be branded on her hand or face with a permanent mark so that all of society can see her disgusting and anti-social crimes.

This is the only way we are going to successfully create a functional society where all stability is not solely dependent on the unbridled sexual desires of infantile women.