Top posts since
last month

www.reddit.com

TarYourLocalBingus #psycho reddit.com

You can’t celebrate Charlie Kirk’s murder and be against public executions.

So many people across multiple platforms that are up in arms about this possible public execution are the same people who praised Kirk’s assassination. That is a tacit admission that you agree with public executions. I’m personally angry this sumbag wasn’t shot twenty minutes after they caught him. I’m tired of feeding and housing people for decades when they are obviously guilty. Same with Lindsey Clancy. As soon as she confessed she had done it, insanity or no, she should’ve been executed the same week. This country will not be sane again until the law actually functions like it should.

Designer_Date2299 #sexist reddit.com

Gender roles for men should absolutely continue to be enforced

Of course I don’t think we as a society should continue forcing the restrictive and oppressive gender roles we historically pushed into women, but men (and women) absolutely benefit from men being held to theirs, that’s just the way it is. I mean all of it, keeping their hair short, dressing like they care about themselves, dedicating themselves to a career and a family to provide for, all are pro social requirements in my mind. If you think this is problematic you are probably just blinded by privilege and fortunate enough to not know true oppression.

TLDR: male gender roles are good, actually, sorry incels.

RoadRunner8195 #sexist #psycho #dunning-kruger reddit.com

The truth is that the Jane Doe supporters wish she was assaulted more than wishing she was not, which proves their compassion is not out of care for her but just performative.

There has been so much back and forth regarding the Cornell 7 allegations. The side which is supportive of Jane Doe loves to preach about believing her, and the other side is quite skeptical and/or calling it a false accusation. The odd thing is people care more about being right on the internet than about her well being, and are therefore rooting for her to have been raped, and would be disappointed if she wasn’t. This proves these people don’t care about her but are just being performative so they can shout “I am Jane Doe” for attention and hating on men, similar to picking the bear.

malacki655 #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Female privilege is a real thing

I am writing this after just finding out that Christa Pike got her execution paused at the last minute. Yes, Christa Pike, the woman who lured an innocent girl into the woods, tortured her to death, kept a piece of her skull as a trophy and tried to kill another inmate in prison. A federal court is halting her execution to consider whether her abusive childhood was taken into account. No joke, look it up.

And of course, we can't forget the Lindsay Clancy case where a woman strangled her three children to death with premeditation but was almost acquitted (and might get the case dismissed) because boohoo she felt a bit sad.

And finally, you have the Cornell hoax where a woman willingly took drugs, alcohol and engaged in group sex with some frat dudes (check the original police report) only to take back her word and claim she was forced in order to save her reputation. Now the internet wants to lynch the men accused.

Do you see the common thread in all three cases? I'll tell you, it's women not being held responsible for their actions. No matter what they do, they are the victim. And that is the conceit of feminism. It tells us women are equal to men, therefore deserving equal rights, but also women can't be held equally responsible for their actions. Well guess what, rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. If you want the same rights as men, don't complain if you are held to the same moral or legal standard! Abolish female privilege now!

TostinoKyoto #sexist #psycho reddit.com

The Jane Doe in the Cornell University rape case could have made better decisions, and that should be okay to say out loud.

We've seemingly become so adamant to protect and comfort rape victims that we become angry when someone dares to suggest that the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions objectively played a role in their victimization. Apparently, this is commonly referred to as "victim blaming."

Whether we want to admit it or not, there are instances where blaming the victim of a crime to some degree, regardless if it's rape or not, is valid. None of us have any right or logic to live our daily lives and think that bad things can't happen to us, or that there aren't bad people who are waiting for us to slip up and let our guard down in order to take advantage of us.

It's not wrong to point out, in this case, that not enough was done on part of the victim to mitigate or minimize the risk of being sexually assaulted. Yes, we know people shouldn't rape, but pointing out the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions isn't the same as apologizing for or legitimizing rape like so many seem to think.

As much as I hate it, we don't live in a society that will ever be free from rapists. So maybe that's something we should keep in the back of our heads before we ever decide to go to a frat house full of horny men and drink and do ketamine? I don't understand the mindset that would think that anyone should be entitled to engage in risky behavior like that and be immune from danger or consequence.

Kotakuinaction #conspiracy reddit.com

Chaosium, is a company whose success is built almost entirely on marketing works derived from the fiction of H. P. Lovecraft. They're crowdfunding a clone of the Forbidden Stars board game for much the same reason that Unfathomable is a Lovecraftian clone of the Battlestar Galatica board game; Lovecraft's work is popular and in the public domain, so it's a cheap substitute for pricier IPs. They've decided that the name of the outer god Shub-Niggurath could conceivably offend people, so not only did they change it, but they feel like they have to crow about why.