Top posts since
last month

#forced-birth

Life is sacred until it’s born, then it’s the law of the jungle.

Professor Jiang #crackpot #forced-birth #wingnut twitter.com

Apparently 20% of all American white girls in their 20s are on OnlyFans. Something like that. ... Just the idea that you have a percentage of American white girls in their 20s all on OnlyFans – that’s just incredible to think about. ...

OnlyFans, I think, is the best indicator of a society in decline. ... The Roman Empire, when it declined, the main problem was that women refused to have children. And so everyone was freaking out, like, you know, "What can we do about it?"

Matthew Plese #fundie #wingnut #forced-birth fatima.org

In recent decades, concern for the environment has increasingly taken on the character of a moral crusade. “Environmentalism” is often presented not merely as prudent care for nature, but as a quasi-religious ideology with its own dogmas, sins, and rites of atonement. In many of its modern forms, this movement subtly displaces God, elevates creation above man, and reduces human dignity to a liability rather than a gift.

The Catholic Church, however, has always taught a far older, deeper, and more coherent doctrine regarding man’s relationship to the created world. Authentic Catholic stewardship of creation stands in clear contrast to secular environmentalism, precisely because it places God at the center, man in his proper place, and creation in ordered service to both.
<...>
This truth immediately distinguishes Catholic teaching from modern environmental ideologies that treat the earth as a self-sustaining organism, a sacred entity, or an ultimate moral reference point. Such views subtly revive ancient paganism, replacing the Creator with the created.
<...>
Modern environmentalism frequently inverts the moral order. Instead of creation serving man for the glory of God, man is portrayed as a parasite or threat to the planet. Human fertility is treated as a problem, economic development as a crime, and technological progress as inherently suspect.

This inversion leads to grave moral errors. Policies justified “for the planet” increasingly promote contraception, sterilization, abortion, and even euthanasia – evils long condemned by the Church. In such systems, human life becomes expendable in service of an abstract ecological ideal.
<...>
Environmentalism, when severed from God, becomes another modern idol – one that often masks hostility toward man himself. Catholic stewardship, by contrast, restores right order: God as Creator, man as steward, creation as servant to divine glory and human flourishing.

Wayne G. #forced-birth #transphobia youtube.com

(submitter’s note: this is on a video of George Carlin’s sketch about euphemisms. I recommend watching the video for full context.)

Dems are doing the same thing by saying health care instead of abortion. And gender affirming care when it actually children mutilating themselves to live as the opposite sex.

Dr. Abby Johnson #forced-birth #wingnut twitter.com

If a mother woke up one day and decided she didn’t want to be a parent, we would never be okay with her murdering her two year old. Her “not wanting” to be a parent is not a justification for murder.

There’s no reason we should allow it simply because the child is in her womb.

Last edited4:32 AM · Mar 13, 2026 · 7,836 Views

BigBandit01 & [deleted] #forced-birth #fundie reddit.com

BigBandit01: Why is it that whenever a person near a pro choicer gets pregnant, they try to pressure them into having an abortion? They’re not pro choice, they’re pro abortion. I see stories all of the time where people are pressuring their friends, daughters, sisters, and girlfriends into getting an abortion, but it’s never about the mother’s choice is it? It’s about pushing this evil act onto others and trying to normalize something cruel.

No point to this post other than to call out that fact really, I don’t have any burning questions or anything. It’s just ridiculous to me that someone who advocates for freedom to choose and control over their body would try to force their will on another person’s body and revoke their choice. It’s seriously messed up.

deleted user: That's why I always say it seems to stem from a general hatred of babies and children, not about "choice". You're right, they shouldn't care if it's the other persons choice, but it feeds their child abuse fetish to encourage hurting as many babies as possible. They consider babies parasites so they can't fathom why anyone would keep a parasite. They only fail to realize that literally thats how all life evolved on the Earth for billions of years. How dare the poor helpless baby you created use a microscopic amount of your nutrients, as if it had a choice, or just a squatter that crawled in there. Congress needs to start drafting a ban on Day 1.