[The main cause of Atheism IS Christians.]

So atheism can only exist in a Christian nation, it can not exist outside of Christian nations?

I think that separation of church and state is the problem. This is a sick sick world, and to condone the removal of Christ from the same doctrine that was created in His name, "one nation under God" seems horrid to me. If we, as Christ's obedient children stuck with Him instead of allowing sin and degradation of Christ to run rampit, perhaps we wouldn't be in the situation we are in today. Homosexual marriage, premarital sex, telling others it's ok to believe in other gods... NO! It's wrong. I can't wait for Revelations to take place, so the Lord can take us home, and out of this place.

The homeboys say that God comes from within:

THRU LIFE, THERE’S MULTIPLE TESTS,
EACH ONE’S MORE DIFFICULT, THAN DA NEXT
MAKE GOALS AND REACH ’EM
AND YOUR EVERY ACTIONS, CLAIRVOYANT
KNOW DAT GOD COMES FROM WITHIN,
AND IF SOMETHING’S NOT DONE RIGHT,
JUST BACK-UP AND DO IT AGAIN

Why don’t Atheists want to love Jesus?

Why don’t Atheists want to love Jesus?

Because Atheists don’t worship false idols,
Because there is no evidence that Santa Exist,
Because Atheists are not hypocrites,
Because Atheists are not in denial.
Because Atheists don’t want the meek to inherit the earth,
Because Atheists don’t want to do to others, what Atheists would have others do to them,
Because Atheists don’t have evidence that Jesus Exist,
Because Atheists don’t want to live a Virtuous life,
Because Atheists don’t want to accept the existence of god,
Because Atheists don’t have scales on their eye,
Because Atheists don’t worship false prophets

I don't have films that portray modern philosophies or fashions, have sexually questionable material in them, or are non/anti-christian in general theme... When I go movie shopping, I rule out 99.5% of everything out there. Most of my films were released before 1965 or take place during/prior to WWII. Exceptions include a few modern films such as Star Wars, Narnia, and Lord of the Rings.

Bottom line? If the women don't wear dresses and traditional family structures aren't found in the film, you won't find it in my collection. If there's blaitant sin in it you certainly won't find it there. If Christ isn't in one form or another elevated or endorsed by the spirit and character of the movie, it goes (a) back to the store it came from or (b) into the trash can... no regrets about it. I hate liberalism and compromise, and I will until the day I die.

A liberal mindset has crept through our society following the second world war... bringing us to the brink of social colapse. We now are forced to fight a new war of right and wrong-- only this time around, in an atmosphere that denies the existance of both.

Here's my take on where the Flood waters went. If it sounds too far-fetched, no problem, it's just a hypothesis (or theory, or guess, or whatever it's called):

My take on this is that the waters, which predominantly came from within the earth, went back down. As it was raining on the surface, water was also coming from below, and the people were sandwiched between the two sources.

When the rains stopped, the waters began falling back down through the holes in the earth. Sort of like a giant bathtub with many plugs that had been pulled.

Now comes the interesting part, a sort of modified Boyle's Law.
pV = k, or pressure x volume = a constant
Isaiah had something interesting to say about Hell:

Originally Posted by Isaiah 5:14
Therefore hell hath enlarged herself...

Here's the entire verse:
Isaiah 5:14
Therefore hell hath enlarged herself, and opened her mouth without measure: and their glory, and their multitude, and their pomp, and he that rejoiceth, shall descend into it.

Using Isaiah 5:14 to modify Boyle's Law gives us this:
pm = k, or pressure x mass = a constant
Since pressure (or more appropriately density) is defined as mass/volume, I conclude this:
(mass/volume) x mass = a constant, or
mass2/volume = a constant
To explain this using a simple example, let's say:
mass = 5
volume = 5
Then the constant is 5 --- (5 x 5 / 5 = 5).

However, double the mass without changing the constant, and what happens? The volume has to compensate for the change:
mass = 10
volume = ?
constant = 5
Thus 10 x 10 / ? = 5, and ? = 20.

This, then, is what Isaiah is basically saying:
As Hell acquires more mass, it enlarges to compensate for its temperature.
Now back to the Flood:

Everyone on earth died except for 8 people, and Hell "super-enlarged" to compensate for the large influx of souls, and the expanding diameter could have engulfed the water reservoirs.

Just a pet theory of mine --- submitted for "peer review".

p.s. The only problem I see with this, is that Christianity teaches that Hell is not a constant temperature, but is in fact, a tiered structure, being hotter in the lower levels.

Why can’t Atheists and religious hypocrites and homosexuals and abortionists and alcoholics and drug addicts and Adulaters and gluttons and murderers and thieves love Santa?

Because there is no Evidence that Santa Exist?
Because they are not hypocrites.
Because they are not in denial.
Because they are just a result of Social Conditioning.
Because they don’t accept the existence of god.
Because they are just slaves of sins.
Because they don’t worship false idols
Because they don’t worship false prophets
Don’t know.

Ask, Seek, Knock
7"Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you.
8 For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened.
9" Which of you, if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone?
10 Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake?
11 If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!
12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.
The Narrow and Wide Gates
13"Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it.
14 But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
15"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...07;&version=31

Why can’t Atheists have promiscuous sex?

Because of the sexual exploitation of women,
Because Atheists don’t want to have a baby yet,
Because of abortion,
Because of HIV and AIDS
Because of Herpes
Because of Genital Warts / HPV
Because Atheists are not a result of Social Conditioning,
Because Atheists are not just slaves of sins,
Because of Syphilis
Because of Gonorrhea
Because of Chlamydia
Because of Hepatitis
Because of Scabies
Because contraceptives fail

[Nomination for the "Christian Turning the Other Cheek" Award]

[Ahhhh, just when I thought crazy was taking the week off. How'd you like the little treat you got at forumole? More surprises can be arranged.]

Well the wife and I figured it was probably the work of a 12 year old. Go ahead and post all the hateful comments you want to over there at forumole. I can delete every bit of it in about 30 seconds so sabotage to your heart's content. I hope you will spend many hours there, please do. Good luck finding the site because your IP address is blocked . **chuckle **chuckle**

Genesis 19:11And they smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to find the door.

I look forward to seeing you there if you can find the door handle.

I guess you'll have to use someone else's pc - so go ahead and make a day of it. Work hard.

Once again that glorious christian site:

http://negligence.forumole.com/

I think comparing the Muslims to Nazis is pretty accurate. Radical Islam seeks to convert all non Muslims to Islam and if they don't convert they will kill you. So I guess in some ways they are better than Nazi's as at least they are giving you the opportunity to join them...although they didn't give that opportunity to the innocent people that were killed in the 9/11 attacks. Which some of the victims were of course Muslims.

So, I think the Nazi comparison with the radical Muslims is very accurate. Not to mention their desire to destroy Israel.

[In response to a poll asking: Would you comitt genocide if God ordered you to? One poster writes 'I'd tell Him to send me to hell, but that I couldn't kill a baby for the sins of its parents. To me personally, God has to conform to morality, not vice versa. I don't worship Him because He is omnipotent.']

You're suppose to worship God because He is King and is Lord of our lives. In any kingdom, whenever a decree of the King is ignored or disobeyed there are consequence's.

You don't chose why you worship Him, He choses for you why you shpould worship Him!

[Excerpts from a long and incoherent post:]

IFOlogy: Solving the UFO-Alien Mystery

This topic is one I opened a few months ago but was banned because it defended the resurrection of the dead that Christ' promised. Now if God did not created the earth then He cannot redeem humanity either. But Jesus promised that there would be a "harvest" of those with the seal of salvation (Eph.1:13) in them (Acts 1:8).

What IFOlogy represents is a thorough explanation of the UFO mystery which is supported by actual NASA sightings seen on video. The IFO-superposition also kills for good, placing the nail in the coffin forever, the documentary hypothesis because it ends the debates over the dates of the Canon (conservative scholars vs.liberal agendist) by find in the ancient text things mentioned that are too modern in knowledge to have been fabricated like evolutionists/liberal scholars teach.

(...)

The interpretation of this footage is supported by ancient Biblical text whereas evolutionists have nothing but ad hoc to defend their presupposition. I encourage all you readers to write me for my chapter 1 (IFOlogy) because it reveals the truth of Creation through the ancient descriptions found in the Bible. This is not a polytheistic-evolution view or a NewAge cosmic Christ view either. It is Biblical based without a single heresy. My traditional church even approved the work and thats a compliment coming from a church that usually condemns all talk about UFOs--but this is not a topic of just UFOs, its the UFO mystery Identified!!

(...)

I cannot post the work here because I cannot save the bold/Italics/Underline which I use throughout the entire paper for analysis. So if you want to read this and discuss this is a civilized discussion without slandering me for being a Bible believing Christian, you can write me at fezzfiles@yahoo.com and I'll send it to you sometime Monday (I will be offline until then).

To deny the UFO evidence is to be ignorant of the evidence supplied by NASA. It the interpretation of the evidence that has to be examined. The Bible tells us the message of what was spoken by God and his angels. That is why the Bible is Divinely inspired.

[When asked: "So if the wife tells her husband that she doesn't want to have sex, and he forces her to (i.e., rapes her), then she is the sinner, not he?"]

God does tell us to rejoice in our spouse's body, and taking that away from the other is not really compromising. And for us traditionalists, there is that whole, obey your husband part of the vows. ::wink wink::

Yes deliberately sinning against human beings is wrong, always has been and always will be. It is more than not morally right to commit genocide, it is a sin. The problem is you don't know who the Canaanites were.

Numbers 13:33 tells us who the Canaanites were that God ordered to be killed to the last man, woman, and child. They were the sons of Anak, they were giants, the Nephilim. The Canaanites God ordered to be killed were not appart of His creation, they were not fully human but were human hybrids.

God did not order the Israelites to commit genocide against Human beings, He did order genocide against the Nephilim however.

Flood geology easily accounts for the formation of coal. It is the geologists method of preference actually.

Fear of the Lord

Proverbs 9:10 states, "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom; and the knowledge of the holy is understanding."

Why fear the Lord? Has He zapped anyone recently?

Oh, you say your daughter is pregnant because she watched the Desperate Housewives show where they made fun of virginity. And your other daughter has had an abortion and gone into depression. And now you learned your son has AIDS after taking the diversity class in his highschool.

Well surly none of these are related to God? Condoms is the cure.

We really don't need God. We have social security to take care of the elderly, welfare to take care of the illegitimate and medical science to resolve all health issues. The life expectancy of everyone, except AIDS people, has increased, which proves we do not need God. The government will provide for all our needs. As soon as we get this stem cell research going, we will be gods. We have an explanation for all of life and history through evolution.

We have the worlds greatest economy and military, although our military cannot win a war. But, who would want to go to attack a country as great as ours, except maybe for the Islamic Terrorists.

Some say the Islamic Terrorists will go away when we get a higher minimum wage, tax the rich and establish social justice.

And, we have freedom of religion, so long as the religious people stay out of politics.

Why waste Sunday morning going to a worship service, much better to go to Target and buy Christmas presents.

Proverbs 12:15 states, "The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is wise."

How about animals that actually communicate with people, in a real, conversational way? Nope, don't see that now.
Our new bodies, like Jesus had after the ressurection will be immortal, and composed not just of flesh, by any stretch of the imagination. We will be imortal, indestructable, and not even need to sleep or eat, though we can eat, and rest if we like. We will be better than supermen and women.
Ever wonder why those that see Jesus in visions, or dreams, or after death experiences, where they come back do not see Him as some old geyser? We don't age in heaven, as we do here, but can level off at the desired age.
WE don't have mere PO bodies there, but bodies no material on earth could harm at all. Forget falling off a cliff. Maybe Adam was like we will be in heaven, and could fly!!! Why not, before the fall? We will fly in the future.
Your mistake is the classic one, trying to artificially impose present reality, and temporary state laws of physical only where they could never belong!!! That is just how wonderful it is!

So I was reading the drivers manual to my moms new SUV the other day (Because I'm a silly nerd, and I want to be informed incase I am driving it and I get into some kind of trouble... I know, I'm a loser).. and I noticed that in the warranty it stated the car isn't covered in any way by an "Act of God."

It struck me as interesting that in such an Atheistic world they still put these kinds of things in a manual instead of "Natural Desaster" or something like that.

I was talking to my brother about it... and his theroy is that the company knows when the rapture hits, they'll in NO way be able to cover all those costs.. and even if they're not Bible believeing people, they are atleast supersticious and think "Might as well.."

[Why do you reject evolution?]

I base it on four propositions:

1. The universe hasn't been around long enough for evolution to work.
2. Evolution assumes there's room for improvement.
3. Evolution and death are inseparable.
4. The Creator's Son didn't believe in it.

Hate the sin, love the sinner.

Homosexuality is curable. If it wasn't, I'd be saying they should be put to death.

[When evidence doesn't support scripture, dad changes the entire universe to make it affirm scripture]

Imagine that the sun used to be quite different, as was all matter in this different past. The ions, and electrons, photons, etc.
With no radioactive decay, even, we would have to wonder if there were even the 'radiation' belts, and present arrangements, and balance as the above map shows we now have.
With a huge water ring system, partial canopy, or canopy, or whatever was here, having just come down, to drown earth.
It seems likely to me, that God could have arranged a focused high pressure blast of some form of cosmic force, that may have hit some areas of the world of water.
Perhaps, some would prefer that the fountains of the deep, helped blast a channel up to space, or some other possible aspect of the different past. I guess we really don't know. But all we really need is that different universe, and the rest is easy!

[When I was a child I had a relationship with an imaginary friend too. I out grew it.]

Are you really serious? Do you really think you can equate the God who created this universe with a "imaginary friend". EVEN IF you really were deceived into believing that, you should at least be sane enough to know that I am not going to be deceived into believing nonsense like that. Do you have aluminum foil in your hat also?

Why will religious hypocrites and atheists become extinct?

Religious hypocrites and Atheists do everything they can to avoid having of offspring.

Religious hypocrites and Atheists use Contraception to reduce their number of offspring.

Religious hypocrites and Atheists use abortion to reduce their number of offspring.

Religious hypocrites and Atheists use homosexuality to reduce their number of offspring.

Religious hypocrites and Atheists are a result of Social Conditioning.

Religious hypocrites and Atheists are just slaves of sins.

Religious hypocrites and Atheists become infertile as a result of sexually transmitted diseases.

Religious hypocrites and Atheists sterilized themselves to reduce their number of offspring.

Religious hypocrites and Atheists become infertile as a result of obesity.

Religious hypocrites and Atheists become infertile as a result of Alcohol abuse.

[Thread about gay marriage...]

This is all I'll say about this thread. I feel the same way about protecting myself and my country if a radical minority ever forces the government to enact pretend "marriages" between people of the same-sex, as our founding fathers did when they wrote the declaration of independence.

Take that how you will.

This book is part of the gay agenda. When it was realized that Christian adults were very resistant to pro-gay doctrine, the only logical next step would be to target children. The mind of a child is very moldable, and at four to seven years old are experimenting with sex. It was found that because children start sex between the ages of 4 and 7 that they were the ideal target for pro-gay doctrine.

The evolutionist, we have pointed out on other threads, builds his platform on a logical redundancy. When you ask him how such and such evolved, he will answer you with a description of its current utility, and suggest that those without such utility were culled by natural selection. As we have pointed out, his position is summed up by the parody "post hoc ergo propter hoc", which is to say "after the fact, therefore before the fact".

[Emphasis added]

There IS a way to win in Iraq if we have the stomach for it

1. We pull our troops out of Baghdad, Mosul, Irbil and Basra.
2. We attack, and demolish these cities with nuclear weapons -- preferably strong enough to wipe out the entire cities. We bomb all four cities within two hours, preferably.
3. We give the remaining insurgents, the Shiites, and the Sunnis 24 hours to lay down their arms and surrender, or we'll drop bombs on Suleymaniye, Kirkuk, al-Najaf, Karbala, Nasirah and Hillah -- again, within two hours of the initial attack.
4. We pull our troops out of Suleymaniye, Kirkuk, al-Najaf, Karbala, Nasirah and Hillah.
5. While we're at it, we also drop a nuclear weapon on Kandahar, Afghanistan, and let the Taliban know that Mazar-I-Sharif, Charikar, Herat and/or Jalalabad in Afghanistan are next and that we have no problem nuking Afghanistan until it glows.
6. We might also let Syria and Indonesia know we're quite fed up with their anti-American attitudes and if they have a problem with that, they can take a trip to Baghdad or Kandahar and see what might be in store for them without a bit of immediate "attitude correction" on their part.

We've spent all this time and money developing nuclear weapons -- we might as well use them on the enemy before the enemy uses them on US. If they're so hot to turn this war into a crusade against the West, we might as well let them know what they're in for.

Creationists are not against science -they are just against silly science

The bible doesn’t specifically say homosexuals should be stoned to death—any sort of method to murder them is biblically acceptable

Rearrange the letters in SANTA and you have

SATAN

And since Satan is the negation of God, we can be sure he's going to take something like CHRISTmas and turn it into something pagan and secular, which is why we have to greet each other with terms the atheists and secularlists love, like "Happy Holidays" and "Seasons Greetings" instead of "Merry CHRISTmas".

It's TIME we TOOK BACK CHRISTMAS.

[Have u ever found something in the bible that u didn't like?]

When you find something in the Bible that you don't like, most likely it's the Holy Spirit convicting YOU on something which is going on in YOUR life.

Homosexuals don't like Leviticus 18 and 20, Romans 1, 1 Corinthians 5 or 6, or Jude -- and yet, homosexuals know intuitively that their choice of lifestyle is WRONG, that it is SINFUL, and the Holy Spirit is trying to convict them to get them to repent of their homosexuality and move back to normal, God-given heterosexuality.

Women, particularly feminist women, don't like 1 Corinthians 14 or 1 Timothy 2 which forbids women from speaking in churches, teaching in churches, or having any authority over men -- and yet, women know intuitively that God created Adam FIRST, THEN Eve from Adam; that God came to earth as a male (not a female), and the natural order is God - husband - wife - children. This exists all throughout nature and also in all human societies. Dogs and cats know this. Horses and cows know this. All of animalkind accepts this -- except humans, who think they have the right to go against God's Natural Order where women are "equal" to men. Christ grants a degree of equality to women, but women have their own sphere of influence just as men have their own sphere.

Yes indeed - when we don't like a part of the Bible, it's usually because the Holy Spirit is working on something in us which GOD doesn't like!

GOD'S LAW IS CLEAR -- THE PENALTY SEVERE!!!

I would suspect that there was no such thing as mathematical forumlae before the Flood

[He asked for it, he got it!]

Myths and stories get exaggerated over time.

Except God's word of course...

lol, I'm going to be put on FSTDT for sure now -_-

[Why do so many Christians interpret the bible literally?]

Well..there are some things that i believe aren't meant to be taken literally..others i do. Most stories is the OT i take literally. Including the flood, adam and eve, etc. Why do i take it literally? Hmm...that's kind of like asking me why i think blue is better then purple. (ehh..i was gonna say something else but it slipped my mind..). It's just a belief i've come to hold. I mean it doesnt tell me anywhere that its not literal. And I dont see why it shouldnt be taken literally. (i dont want to go into a debate on the flood over science)

[How do you explain smaller animals that could not have lived in the wild. I own a maltese dog, which you may know is a really tiny (yet cute) dog. If Adam and Eve's children had children, wouldn't they be inbreeding and be retarded?]

It wasn't wild in Eden, the animals were friendly, even talked.
Inbreeding didn't exist then, as the genetics were different.

(You know that the Bible is true because it is the Word of God, and you know that it is the Word of God because it says so. Round and round we go...)

Maybe YOU see circular logic, but I see miraculous preservation.

You see craters in this earth made 30,000 thousand years ago, I see craters in this earth made by rock abrasions during the Flood. And, yes, that interpretation may be incorrect, but it would be even worse to reinterpret Scripture just to call it a meteorite. I'd rather err on the side of interpreting the physical evidence than interpreting the Scriptures.

[Originally Posted by growingupinhim
another reason to not to do it [masturbate]..porn is indeed sin..not only sin but evil. ]

Be careful what you call evil. Evil is a powerful tag. Now I am not interested in porn but most models do it willingly, there is no evil involved. It may be a sin, but its not evil. Its only evil if it keeps you from God and then its not the porn but the addiction to porn that is Evil. The addiction itself would be evil, not the porn.

Satan is the evil one, what he wispers in our ear constantly is evil. To me personally porn is not evil because it has no hold on me, so it is not evil. when something grabs ahold of you and keeps you from God then it can be called evil, but in that it is only the desire, the adiction that is evil and not the thing itself.

[emphasis added]

(Keith Ellison, D-MN, takes oath of office on Quran)

A sad day for America...the Bible has truly been pushed aside for the benefit of self-serving politicians...

[Replying to article “Public execution of gay man in Iran met with cheers”.]

Consider this: do you see homosexual “pride” marches in Iran? No.

Do you see mincing, swishing “queens” parading down the streets in Iran? No.

Do you see homosexuals creating a public nuisance by congregating in homosexual bars in Iran? No.

Do you see homosexuals demanding that the institution of marriage between one man and one woman being discarded so as to include homosexual “relationships” in Iran? No.

Do homosexuals know their place in Iran, and are homosexuals shoved back into the closet just about as far as they will go? YES.

[On why masturbation is a sin...]

The Bible clearly teaches homosexuality is a sin. The reason homosexuality is a sin is because God created sex between a man and a woman. Since man was not intended to give sexual pleasure to a another man, it is sin. But it is sin for a man to give sexual pleasure to another man, why would it be acceptable for a man to give sexual pleasure to himself?

Please excuse my graphical illustration here, but I think it is needed to make a point. Why would it be wrong for a man to take his hand and give me sexual pleasure with his hand, and yet it be OK for me to use my own hand to give myself sexual pleasure??? In both cases, the hand that is giving me sexual pleasure would be a man's hand!

The secret BIG sin that women, females and girls do too . . .

Unlike, sins that involve the touching of others . . .

it seems that masturbation is the ultimate sexual release;

alas, it is not . . .

It destroy those whom masturbate just as any other sin would . . .

You can imagine how great of sin it is; even if done in the "NAME" . . .

of Physical Health , i.e. when a Doctor requires one

to preform the act ~ in A test tube ~ petri dish or other glass apparatus . . .

I don't know the name of what it is called: when the doctor sticks his or her finger

up the male anus (supposedly) checking for the gland that is supposed to cancerous . . .

They say it is "innocent" . . .

you've heard it: It "seems" so innocent . . .

However; it is not . . .

Every swimmer must KNOW the secret, because, cold showers really can assist one in overcoming sexual "urges" . . .

* MEN can go swimming in real cold water for a mere fee at the YMCA,

not to be confused with the YWCA, where women get NO service . . .

SEE

y' started off wrong . . .

It' s WHOM is GOD . . .

HE is a LIVING " BEING " . . .

GOD can not be a Female cuz

no rightly thinking person would ever

worship her . . .

She could not even fix menstruation,

commonly known

as The Curse

When the time comes, Jesus is going to relax His hold on the Strong Nuclear Force, and the protons are going to fly apart --- described in the Bible as "melting".

[A <a href="http://www.messengersoffaith.net/Jesus.html" target="_blank">jesus doll</a> the one2believe company donated to the U.S. Marines to distribute through toys for tots; but the Marines declined the dolls stating they distributed toys all over and had no way of knowing if the dolls would end in Jewish or Muslim homes.]

By making themselves judge, jury and executioner over the religious leanings of the toys, hasn't Toys for Tots violated the First Amendment by discriminating against religious toys in general, and perhaps Christian toys in particular?

Like I said before, my hunch is that a Buddha or Ganesh doll would not generate half the opposition. It's up to the parents to decide what toys reach their kids--not the government. In any sane world, every non-senile judge would recognize Toys for Tots' policy as unconstitutional.

[Talking about gravity]

Well,the answer to this one is easy,,,,
God started the spinning as he stretched out the universe amongst time and space,,and its been spinning ever since.

How do I know this?

Because I just do,if you want proof,go ask God yourself.

God sends the babies. He will provide if we ask Him. Soon, there will be no more seas, that means a lot more room. Plus New Jerusalem, which could hold an additional, something like 23 billion, and still have space for a mile high skyscraper, with 8 1 acre apartments on EACH floor for every family of five!!! Or, if you prefer, a 125 square mile ranch for the same!!!!! Who are you kidding??

[dad justifying the deaths of well over 2,200,000 people recorded in the Bible]

mur·der (mûrdr)
n. 1. The unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice.
2. Slang Something that is very uncomfortable, difficult, or hazardous: The rush hour traffic is murder.
3. A flock of crows. See Synonyms at flock1.

Love killings by God are not any of these things at all. Any more than a farmer who has a sick cow, and has to put it down, for the sake of the rest of the herd is 'murdering' it!!!! Gottcha.

[On Richard Dawkin's book The God Delusion.]

YOu do not really expect that Christians are going to read dribble like that do you?

The thing about Dawkins is that everything is black and white. What he believes is either true or false. There either is a God or there is no God. Atheism is either true or false. There is no middle ground and there are no doubts.

To many people try to compromise and end up being luke warm. But you are either in or out with God, you are either for Him or against Him. You are either a friend of God or an enemy of God.

Then what is your definition of "science"? Is it evolution? The idea that dinosaurs suddenly sprouted wings and became birds? Or that monkeys broke there tails, started walking on 2 legs and became people?

Is that science to you?