Caamib

caamib #psycho #wingnut rapey.su

Trump has to stay in power. The Democratic Party of the 2020 combines the worst aspects of Nazi Germany, namely extreme racism and intolerance towards opposition (the only difference that this racism is now against whites) and Soviet Union, namely hostility towards small business. It would be a disaster if these people came to power. If Trump does lose the election he should immediately declare a dictatorship, which would enable him to mercilessly crush the left and set the stage for a peaceful partition of the US once he steps down. If I were Trump I'd just start a dictatorship after Nov 3 in any case and start a war against the left on the streets, since army would be on my side. I would not stop this war before I exterminated all of them.

caamib #wingnut rapey.su

Whites who aren't afraid of Biden's victory are kinda like Jim Jones cult members.

In what way?


They don't feel threatened because they are white liberals, and thus they feel that their own existence is a crime and want to be killed by niggers. Like Jim Jones cult members, they don't fear death but welcome it because for them the existence of whites is unacceptable. So what they're saying by claiming "I am a white who is not threatened by Joe Biden's victory" is akin to a Jim Jones cult member saying "I am not threatened by drinking poison, I know I will go to heaven".

But not all whites are insane as they are. .

Caamib #psycho pro-rape.com

(Talking about a video in which a 10 year-old girl giving birth can be seen)

Jesus fucking christ... that segment with her giving birth got me so horny that I had to masturbate right away even with me being a no fapper. I don't think it will do anything to cause penile sensitivity again in any case, since I came in about 10 seconds of fapping, barely having to touch my dick.

Caamib #psycho incelsandmalesexualists.com

1568062876202.jpeg

Dragan (born 1980)

1568062992061.jpeg
his "victim"/rape slave, Tijana (1999-2014)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Tijana_Jurić

https://balkaninsight.com/2014/08/07/teenage-girl-s-cruel-murder-shocks-serbia/

https://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2014&mm=08&dd=07&nav_id=91223

https://www.telegraf.rs/english/161...-juric-will-rot-in-prison-until-his-74th-year

https://www.telegraf.rs/english/297...years-since-the-brutal-murder-of-tijana-juric


A video taken in a summer camp during what is likely June or July 2014. She was a very talented singer !

My opinion/explanation

It is indeed very controversial to call this man a hero. What he did seems pretty heinous and it's in our natures to be protective of young people, especially girls. When I first saw this story I genuinely teared up for Tijana. This is simply our nature.

Yet, there is more to this than the story says. While browsing the Internet looking for more info I found that he was not married at 34. Sure, he had only finished elementary school and was of a low IQ, but could you imagine some low-IQ butcher being single against his will in something like 1914 Serbia? Yeah, me neither.
I found one article (that I can't find now for the life of me) where I read that his aunt asked him when is he finally going to marry and he sadly replied that he will never marry, which shocked her. I will put the article (though it's in Serbian) the moment I find it.

This guy was incel, and it was society that made him incel. I have little doubt that this was why he killed her.

Serbia is within the femisphere and is a feminist country where bad boys are highly sought after. Material wealth is also sought after, but, again, like in most feminist countries, that wealth is not the wealth of some normal worker but huge wealth. Look at this video


A pathetic country that deserves things everything it has coming to it.

Who, on the other hand, was Tijana? Well she seems to be a talented young singer who attended a music school parallel to her main education. But, honestly, what were the chances of her remaining a decent woman in 5 to 10 years?

caamib #sexist caamib.wordpress.com

[Excerpt from his manifesto "THE STORY OF YOUR INCEL – AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH"]

NECESSARY PRECURSORS

1) All civilized societies were patriarchies.

2) Women are agnostic about male behavior. This means they’re not naturally attracted to any type of man but that their preferences change depending on which kind of men is the most successful with women.

3) In connection to nr.2, women’s preference for a type of male changes simply based on a degree of success a type has with most women.

4) Seduction is worthless, even harmful for most species, as it does not promote any valuable traits that make the species better. It is a form of deceit males make do spread their genes and it creates worthless offspring. This is explained by a phenomenon called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway

5) I believe voting is a privilege that should only be given to intelligent men and shouldn’t be given to women.

caamib #fundie dailyantifeminist.wordpress.com

I think both of you go too far. The OP proclaims to be a half-troll but I like his approach and much appreciate his blog so it matters less if he’s serious or not but I’ll assume you certainly are, Chinzork.

It would be a folly to just teach women to be sex slaves and prostitutes. Once feminism collapses there will be millions of sluts and feminists who will be just that for a loaf a bread and a glass a water a day and, believe me, you will not have to teach the first generation anything about fucking and sucking anyway.

But in order to maintain the current level of industrial civilization in a non-feminist society (which will soon be surpassed once male creative energies are released and sexual frustration and PC are no longer a hindrance) you’ll need women for jobs like teaching, maids, nursery, probably even doctors. I agree that they shouldn’t be allowed into basically any STEM fields because they just create dissension between men and exchange sexual services for career advancement but they must do some jobs as well.

What’s really important, even more than the STEM thing, is that 1. they get no right to vote – it is impossible to have a civilization with this 2. are married off to good men young 3. aren’t socializing with men outside of families.

With this you have already solved 99 percent of the problem.

Btw, daily, is there any way to donate to you? Loving your blog !

caamib #sexist holocaust21.wordpress.com

So, STE. I guess the most interesting thing would be knowing who you are in terms of your ideology.
Are you some libtard trying to stir up some of our vague “coalitions” or are you a real libertine who supports Holcoausts’ blog? Or are you something third?

If you are just some leftie I’ll tell you to go fuck yourself. But I’ll assume you’re somebody who actually supports Holocaust21.

I’ve never tried to hide the fact that I hate modern Western women. I believe them to be incapable of being good mothers and wives. This is no secret, most of my writings talk about that. To understand my post, you’d have to know the fundamental change that happened in the world around 2000-2004, which had to do with feminism entering my home country and making providers now unnecessary and to be replaced by seducers. Since I am not a seducer doing horrible shit like that would have indeed made me more attractive to girls that age, when I was 12 myself. Why didn’t I? Because I didn’t know how things were ! My parents, teachers etc were all raised in a society that was much less feminist. The shit a person like that Calvin2018 nutcase blames me for is just that – not getting around in a completely new environment on time. Also, Calvin’s posts, both on Reddit and their blog, are horrendous accusations veiled behind fake intellectualism, as they couldn’t even pretend it’s not about sex for a single day despite claiming they don’t believe it is (I mean it’s just in their title and everything they write, why I am so picky when saying that?) and plainly told me that me not being incel for a year means that I’ve been having sex for an year. That is Calvin, but you’re not mentioning them so I won’t go further into that.

Does that post say I’d do the same thing now? No, it doesn’t !

You call me a misogynist? Do you know what that would entail? It would entail hatred of ALL women. But how many of my posts attacked women in non-feminist societies? There are some sentences I made on female nature in general, but they’re more “buyer beware” than hateful content.

Is killing women wrong? Depends on how you view these women. I view modern Western women as irredeemably evil, and believe killing them makes a male more, not less attractive. Same with rape or other acts of violence against them. I’ve seen the rape thing with my own eyes. You call MRA’s misogynists? What is this, 2012? Honey, MRAs have been losing relevance for some years. And, no, they’re not all misogynists, this is something retarded that a feminist would write in 2012.

And finally, do people you mentioned have disagreements? Of course they do. I disagree with some of Nathan’s ideas and consider them absurd and barbaric (impregnating you daughter? C’mon). I disagree with Holocaust that the best societies were Netherlands or Sweden in the 70s. I mean, I think these were pleasant to live in but were something like that moment before Willie Coyote realizes that there is a nothing underneath him. They didn’t function on sustainable grounds and turned to shit they are now because the foundations were wrong even then.

But why should we agree on everything?

Now, if you wanna make a serious reply to this go ahead. But I doubt you will.

caamib #fundie caamib.wordpress.com

Well, I thank you for this comment. The idiots that believe I censor everybody would think I would delete and not publish this but in fact this comment is in line with all the rules, since insults are paired with some arguments. The problem is that your arguments don’t stand so well.

“You think the blacks coming Africa are going to take over Europe and make it some Islamic paradise? HAHA HAHA”

You’re equating blacks and Middle Easterners, as Rationalist already told you. Huge parts of Africa are Christian as well. I agree that blacks are of poor IQ and basically animals but guess what? 1) I place more stock in Middle Easterners 2) poor IQ and basically animals is what the Westerners are becoming as well.

“Islam is like the down syndrome brother of Christianity that wear’s the super man shirt and thinks it’s a super hero because so.”

Dude, please ! If you think Christianity is in any way more functional than Islam right now look at the state of young people in the current Western world, who are worthless trash. Their women are all skanks and whores, young men degenerate idiots. I prefer Islam to a culture where the same man can’t breed a woman and take care of a child – and this is the current Western culture.

“The blacks coming from Africa may very well find coal burners to mate with and have children with, forcefully or not. But those children will be burned just like the adults.”

No. What you don’t understand is that these children are no less valuable than white children produced by seduction. And if your reply’s gonna be something like “But you wanna enslave wimmen because ya can’t get laid you stupid jew” to a person who had girlfriends and sex you will just prove my point. Seducers shouldn’t be allowed to have kids and kids of white seducers are worse than any black kids of black non-seducers. This is the crucial thing you’re missing.

“The AfD being voted in in Germany is the start of this. Poland saying not white, not right shows us this. Brexit, Trump, Australia closing it’s door to the unskilled – all indicator’s of the left’s slipping foothold. And when the liberals are in the minority, all it will take is a brave, mustache touting wild eyed facsit to kick of the great purge once again.”

Let me school you on some of this

1) AfD is voted into the Parliament. It is nowhere near power and no other party wants to go into a coalition with it.

2) Poland? Oh you mean the hyperfundie place where you can’t get an abortion if raped by one of these blacks you rail about? Well, guess what- none of this means dick to what I’m saying. Polish women are still pieces of shit and Roosh’s experiences in places like Warsaw said they’re worse than women in small backward American towns. Imagine how awful they are then ! Poland has an extremely right wing government now but this does nothing to curb seduction or annul so called “women’s rights”, just like Trump’s victory didn’t make American women better. It’s all just your misconceptions in which you believe “right wing government = good society” without taking any real factors into consideration. If Poland repeals women’s suffrage, which no successful society can have, then one could take them seriously. Up to that point it’s all a joke.

3) I touched on Trump. Brexit and Australia? Again, do you know what this essay says? It says that even if Muslims are left out the West will collapse on its own. I am not calling for Muslims because the West is functional. I am calling for them because the West remaining is a worse option.

“And when the liberals are in the minority, all it will take is a brave, mustache touting wild eyed facsit to kick of the great purge once again.”

I’d have no problem with that, as long as that fascist does the right steps in terms of banning women’s suffrage and all forms of feminism. Otherwise everything will remain the same. I will be the first to fight alongside such a man if he can get “women’s rights” to a 1750 AD level.

“It might be 10, 20, 40 years from now. Primitives like yourself are going to be taken and tortured for worshipping your pig fucker, Mohummad.”

Again, you’re missing the point of this essay. The point is that I believe there is no better alternative than Islam. Your post did nothing to say why the current West, with all the faults of it my essay lists, is a better alternative.

Btw, another problem is that you have no idea how strong what you’re fighting against is. These are people who would have their own female children, wives and sisters raped by Muslims at any age but hate you for being straight and white and these people have enormous power. See how the America looks like today. There’s more witch-hunts against men than ever, under a Republican administration. I’d wager it is still much more likely that they will win and then hand power to Muslims, who will destroy them to the man.

caamib #sexist caamib.wordpress.com

We could also say that men are simple biological machines as well, as they would fuck basically anything if allowed.

That’s why we need extremely strict rules and harsh punishments for both genders when it comes to things like adultery. A man who commits adultery with another man’s wife must know he will, if discovered, die.

Also, you’re once again incredibly naive. If you support women’s suffrage you can’t support female premarital chastity. I mean, you can, but that’s insane, as it makes no sense and is contradictory.

A woman's suffrage is a feminist policy and means that women will vote themselves priviledges that will enable them to be sluts.

It’s like saying you support democracy but won’t support something the demos votes for – not possible.

Your ideas are like saying “I support billions being thrown into war machine but I oppose war.”

C’mon.

caamib #sexist rantsofanincel.wordpress.com

Lon, your fairy tales are just that – fairy tales. They have little to do with an actual state of most human beings. Simply put, if feminism made all the men in the world incel they’d quickly tear the system down and massacre those responsible. They wouldn’t listen to middle-aged men who have given up telling them to “let go of hate”.

Feminism is hate itself. It can only be defeated by hating it even more. Men most forgo some “consent” crap as long it isn’t defined in it’s sane form – as a differentiation between a married woman cheating or a married woman being raped. The OT often didn’t even make the distinction between an unmarried girl being raped and her just fooling around. It mattered very little to the consequence, which was that the guy was to marry her. That’s how a man is to think. You can’t think in any other way.

Also, your loaf of bread thing is also incorrect. At times, dealing with women can inflict worse pains that simply never having any experience. I was basically a feminist until I got more experience with women and saw what they really were – animals. Now I have more experience exactly because I ditched feminism and treated them like the animals they are. I wish it weren’t so but the only culture where women do behave is a patriarchal civilization where men guide them to good behavior.

Caamib #sexist #psycho caamib.wordpress.com

[Talking about a 19 year-old girl who was raped and murdered by two immigrants in Germany]

With all this in mind, who was Maria Ladenburger? Well, her Wikipedia article says she was a German medical student who died when she was almost 20 and unmarried (search results on other sites say she was a daughter of some EU official but that is less important for the quantitative part).

So let us try to bring statistics into this equation. This amusing Durex study shows that she was likely not a virgin. These stats show that it was about 35 percent likely she would have a child out of wedlock in just 2014 (Table 3) and that her chances of being married at all were— well, getting slimmer every year, with a slight change upwards in 2014 (Table 1). That is if she would ever have kids – luckily, there’s Muslims. Now, we can speculate this or that on her personality. Obviously none of us knew her. But even using just some quickly found statistics one can easily see why Maria Ladenburger was, like most young Western European women, likely on her way to be a slut who was to be childless or have a child out of wedlock. And bear in mind, she was not even 20. All the indicators I outlined here will get worse, not better. As one character from a TV show I used to watch said “I know it’s tragic to think that way but you can’t argue with the fucking logic !”

Qualitatively, things are a bit more tricky as they go into the emotional aspect which can’t be expressed with just numbers. But I’ll argue that they’re covered well enough. Most decent, moral men have their horror stories with women. Along with my February 2014 text, I highly recommend these stories written on CoAlpha forums in September 2015. One of the worst problems with anecdotal, qualitative evidence is that you can always find some moron whose stories with Western women were happy and most of our idiocratic society will find his story to be more uplifting and credible because the author is mainstream, even if it’s obvious by the way he acts later that his success was due to the fact that he was a massive asshole and as dumb as dirt. But, I won’t go into that any longer, seeing I already covered it and concluded that one must make their own conclusions on whether or not today’s Western women are worth it.

Maria Ladenburger was likely to become everything or at least most of things this blog is so vehemently against. Her parents’ money would likely ensure that she is protected from any consequences of her future shenanigans and that she is able to proceed with these on a high level. She was likely rotten even at the time of her death and even more likely to become rotten very soon. And she was, like current women in Trump’s USA, not to improve if some right wing party had won the elections. Had she lived, she would very likely be a source of trauma for every decent man in Germany (well, um, both of them) who was unlucky enough to see potential for anything more serious than careless pump and dump in her. She would almost certainly be a pest, let us be honest, Westerners. She is the kind of girl who would reject you for treating her respectfully so you can be called an asshole and a “nice guy” by her brain-dead army of liberal virginal fanatics (whose ultimate prize isn’t pussy anyway but being loyal soldiers of their own tragedies) if you object in any way while the moron with an IQ of 20 fucking her somehow has “actual personality” – a stance these loyal liberals would hold as long as those being annoyed with Maria are members of the appropriate groups one is allowed to hate (you can usually tell them by the color of their skin and lack of gay mannerisms).

With its brain-dead youth, assholish majority of population and complete internalization of cancerous social policies like feminism West is dying old man. So Maria was a sad but a necessary victim of a situation where West has forfeited its reproductive, economic and every other future to a stronger group like Muslims.

caamib #sexist #senpai_noticed_us holocaust21.wordpress.com

Those FSTDT freaks are some of the lowest life forms on the planet. They’re not even freaks as this would imply that they’re human beings. Notice how neither one of these monsters even considers that the allegations might have been untrue and just consider it a given that he did it end of story. And then their simpleton way of viewing things that could hurt you only shared with chimps. Knife stabbing – bad. Sexual harassment allegations? Not so bad. What morons ! I’d much rather prefer to be stabbed in some situations than get such accusations, as would most men. But no, to them it’s just a given that stabbing, no matter the circumstances, if worse, and if you’re accused of sexual harassment it’s a given you’re guilty. What vile, ugly, disgusting bunch of shiteating maggots they are.
Reply

caamib #fundie fstdt.com

[On being accused of lacking empathy]

Unlike the imbeciles here who say that being permanently denied relationships and sex because you are not a rapist and a murderer is a-ok and no problem, but getting a dick in a place where it is designed to go into is the biggest trauma ever lol? Women are biologically designed to love rape. That they didn't in some societies was only because men instilled the desire to mate with their husbands in certain patriarchal societies by mating them with coalphas. Aversion to rape is a result of patriarchies.

caamib #sexist caamib.wordpress.com

As had been previously explained, America had pretty much for all intents and purposes died by 1920 and the disastrous decision of the 19th Amendment, though some opinions place the beginning of the end even earlier, in 1800s. So in this aspect, which is a crucial one, America will not return to sanity. Trump won’t abolish women’s suffrage, he won’t bring women back into kitchens, none of this will happen. Did the Bush presidency restore the value of American women? Did the Reagan presidency stabilize what was a rapidly plummeting value of American women in the 80s (of course, with certain noble exceptions of women in backwoods areas, exceptions which still exist today) ? No, the battle is lost. The best aspect in terms of women will be, as Roosh says, to make it easier to find a fellow traveler. But even there you need to be careful which traveler to choose.

In terms of feminism, SJWs, alt-right etc, all of these things are kinda irrelevant ultimately if you look at the paragraph above, which outlines the real crux of the issue. Without abolishing women’s suffrage, without a hasty return to strict patriarchy, nothing of real relevance will happen. And we know Trump could never do that

caamib #fundie fstdt.com

Amazing !

Three accusations, neither of which bear any resemblance to reality.

1. You claim I contradict myself, yet nobody ever managed to provide a single example. When they tried they have just shown that they don't understand and twist my words, like when they said I oppose rape and killing of Western women by Muslims but am for Islamic rule in fact I fully support rape and killing of Western women by Muslims but dislike that libtards like you want to make this legal just for Muslims. This is a huge difference. Modern Western women deserve to be killed by Muslims, but they also deserve to be killed by whites as well. You liberals just want them killed by Muslims but don't want them even touched by non-Muslim whites.

2. And then, after this, you make a strawman about some of the most basic things I believe - guess what, I don't believe in an "organized" effort against such men. I claim it was a spontaneous process that started in the 1920s with the 19th Amendment. These things happen very slowly and spontaneously. Hell, 19th Amendment was in 1920 and it took about 40 years for America to have its first slut generation.

3. In conclusion, even your third claim manages to be batshit - I don't "self-promote" myself as anything. I don't give a shit how anybody will see me nor do I get anything out of it.

So, another delusional moron living in lalaland who thinks he/she can criticize somebody while lacking basic knowledge about their ideas.

Caamib #psycho #sexist reddit.com

{from 6 years ago}

Female perspective of rape

Feminist females define "rape" as being any sex they later regret. It is not so much that they will lie and say you raped them when they know you didn't. If you have sex and then they regret it for some reason, such as that you are of lower perceived status than they thought, then as far as they are concerned you "raped" them. Conversely, if you threw a female to the ground, ripped her clothes off and f***ed her without so much as a by your leave and she felt positive about what happened later on, it would probably not even occur to her to think she was raped. Thus the very same physical actions on the man's part could see him categorized either as a great lover or rapist depending on the later claimed emotional response of the female. Since it is not possible to objectively examine an emotional response, it follows that most "rape" cases are now prosecuted on spectral evidence, similar to the Salem witch trials. If we define "rape" as being forced sex, females do not think this is particularly bad or a big deal. Only self-hating manginas think rape is a big deal. Females like manly men who take charge of them and do what they want to them, not sniveling manginas begging them for sex and asking their permission nanosecond by nanosecond. Hence most erotic fiction aimed at females contains rape or quasi-rape scenes and females getting off on being raped is well known in criminology circles. In contexts where it is desirable and socially acceptable for them to have sex, females generally like being raped.

Rape in history

Sane societies do not revolve around the idiot "consent" or other mindless whims of females. In traditional societies females are placed under the control of men such as their husbands, fathers, pimps or whoever, and those men decide when they will have sex or not within the rules of that society. Often it would be considered the obligation females to have sex. After all, we all have unchosen obligations, and there is no reason why sex should be any different. The crime of rape was considered to be forced sex outside of the rules of society, such as a burglar forcing a married woman to have sex while robbing her husbands house. As stated, it is really the same today, except females now have control over what is deemed rape. The consent thing is a red herring.

caamib #fundie caamib.wordpress.com

This summer I had been spending a warm August evening talking to a friend in his backyard. We had a few beers and were discussing different issues and common acquaintances. He knows about my problem and this blog but doesn’t follow it that regularly.

During this year we had less contact than previous years due to various circumstances so he wasn’t aware of the shift in my thinking I experienced this year.

Anyway, we somehow got to these topics and I told him what I think the actual reasons for my incel are and what I plan to do about this. I told him about what society really is, how women actually are and how I think I might attract a woman and for which activities (which, sadly, don’t include a relationship, since they’re not capable of understanding the concept).

As I was telling him the horrible truth about why incel happens and what women want he kept getting paler and paler, looking at me with terrified eyes. By the time I finished telling him about what disgusting men and sickening acts women today want and with which barbaric actions I plan to attract one, he froze and, despite being a healthy man in his 20s who was in no way drunk that evening nor acutely or chronically ill, literally threw up.

Caamib #psycho incelsandmalesexualists.com

[Do you disagree that it's sometimes the logical action for an individual to take?]

I don't disagree that it's sometimes a logical action to take. This is more of a rule to ban those "Kill yourself" assholes, but then again they could be banned by some other rules for saying that. That being said, I think there's always at least a small degree of hope in your life. Take yourself for example. Most people would say you're living a failed life and in some sense you are. But at the same time you've made more difference than most morons who work 9-5 jobs do.

There's another reason. I'd much prefer people who wanna commit suicide going ER. It would kill some Western scum and give more attention to the site. Them offing themselves in empty rooms, not so much. But I can't put that into rules.

caamib #sexist fstdt.com

benjamin2k is being naive. Western sluts want and need rape.

This is widely known by anybody who isn't a brainwashed mangina. It's known even among various disparate groups that don't quite like each other, like Red Pillers and conservative Jews/Muslims.

Modern Western women aside from few exceptions like Amish or Hasidic Jews, are disgusting braindead sluts and slugs who enjoy violent men and being raped. The idea that you can enter a relationship with them is insane. They'd kill the child of any man who'd want to take care of it. This is simply because women want to breed with men who make most kids, and such men are stupid, worthless criminals today. So you have this kind of a dissociation where a criminal will make a child and the state/beta cuck will take care of it. The same person can't be a father and take care of a child in advanced feminism.

And remember - if she stays alive a guy won't.

Caamib #psycho archive.is

(In regards to his daughter)

Oh, have no worries, I won't visit her at all. However, I'd like to try sleeping with her when she turns 12 if I can find her then but who knows what will happen by then

caamib #fundie reddit.com

>I think I answered most of it above

You didn't answer jack shit. You're the same idiot you always were. And now you've reached the levels of stupidity that...

>but I dont get this sacred clasee stuff, I don't know what you mean.


... I have to explain your own religion to you?

You don't understand your own religion?

DUDE, YOU'RE A LIBERAL.

**PRIVILEGE**

Do you understand?

Non - privileged people are sacred, you owe them everything and they can do whatever they want, to whomever they want. They can kill your mother, sister, whore "gf", anybody, and you will be dancing.

Are you really demented enough not to see that?

>like I dont believe you have had enough experience with women

Again, if you "believe" that you failed to read anything I wrote about my experience. Thus it's not a belief anymore but a delusional attack. Like me saying I believe Bill Gates is poor. I believe it. I really do. And somebody's supposed to take me seriously and not ban me because I'm a moron.

>you can respectfully disagree without banning people and disregarding them

Unless they're a) breaking the rules b) being delusional lunatics, which is what you are doing and being in your every post.

>It wasn't abuse or insults

It was, given that your "opinion" has nothing to do with reality of my life I described.


>which intrigued me for a bi

Yet you never tried to actually read and learn anything about it. So this is another lie.

>I love how you keep calling me a liberal.

You support every single feminist policy. That you "don't like" the world you wholeheartedly support is why you're a moron. Get back to me when you start supporting eradication of every single feminist, abolition of every single political right women have and a return to a strictly patriarchal society. Because, you fucking idiot, lack of these created today's world.

But I'm "anti women" for knowing how to solve these problems, you know?

Go fuck yourself you mental midget.

caamib #sexist blogger.com

(talking about a news report in which a suspended policeman is charged with reading erotic stories involving underage girls)

Does the article say anything about how old the "children" (girls?) in the stories the guy read were? I mean, the story is simply sickening even if they were newborns, given that these are just effin stories, but it would be even more infuriating if they were like 15-18. That would just be one of the craziest, sickening and most hateful things I've ever seen, maybe even the most sickening one.

I remember using SMS flert services back in mid 2000s. At least several times I've ran into 14 or 15 year-old girls who were very, very sexually active. One openly bragged about having a "fuck buddy" while being an eight grader and wanted to meet me as well. Of course, things have changed a lot since then here and become a lot more hateful as well.

Holden (aka caamib) #sexist #psycho cwckiforums.com

[previous poster]"So if I'm hearing you right, if a woman tried to leave you, you would try to harm her so that she wouldn't. If she still managed to leave you after that you would try to make her suffer a fate worse than death?"

You're not hearing me right. I'd make sure she's destroyed the moment she tries to leave me. Before we'd even start dating I'd make her do a porn with a horse or a dog, I'd have all her credit card numbers, I'd know all about her tiniest details.

It sucks, but no other way to keep a modern woman. However, that's just another hypothetical scenario. They're not capable for relationships anyway.

Caamib #psycho rgif.is

Maybe I should look up my daughter when she's already 11?

It wouldn't make that much of a difference and might save me an year of waiting. Judging by her mother she'll be a complete slut so why bother waiting until she's 12? Plus they might move in an year.

Caamib #sexist fstdt.com

Reddit's censorship is really disgusting. That site is beyond evil. I was banned for saying I MIGHT want to sleep with one 12 year-old girl but, mind you, not now or in several weeks or months but 11 FUCKING YEARS. And that would not even be illegal in some countries, as some countries have the age of consent set at 12. Yet I was banned for "sexualization of minors" and the subreddit I maintained turned into slime and disaster you currently see associated with the term incel.

caamib #sexist fstdt.com

"You declare Marc Lepine a saint for gunning down 28 people in cold blood because he didn't like feminists"

Yes, this is a good thing. Feminists are the reality's equivalent of Satan so gunning some women to oppose feminism is a good thing. I am aware that not all of these women considered themselves feminists but this is of no importance. They all likely held basic feminist beliefs, given that they were female students at a male dominated field.

"and then taking the coward's way out. "

Oh please. Many of you freaks even call Breivik a coward. What the hell is a brave way out to you after such acts? Dying in a shootout with the police?

Caamib #sexist #psycho twitter.com

Those opposing incel violence should remember that a) this violence is caused by deprivations no sentient being should feel b) they don't oppose violence against straight white males. To them, these are all lice that must be exterminated.

…

Your idea rests on the incorrect assumption that "children" (a term which you use even for older teens like those at 17) are somehow inherently incapable of giving consent. It is not so. In the past some girls entered marriage even at 10 years old.

…

I'm sorry your 13 year-old daughter got ran over and killed, Ms. Smith, but at least no dirty male looked at her ! So rejoice about that, as it is far more important.

…

Any decent man masturbating must have his fingers broken. Your penis is a weapon. Use it.

…

I'd beat the living fuck of any woman who claimed to be incel.

…

If you're wanted by any modern Western woman there is something wrong with you. Only non-consensual sex with modern Western women is right.

…

If my grandfather opened fire on women in his town during the 1940s they'd be disgusted and scared. Modern Women would be attracted....

Caamib #fundie atheistforums.org

[I'll gladly remain a virgin if it takes forcing myself on someone just to get laid.]

Then you are fucking insane. This is like some Christian saying that you'd rather be starving than eating at a McDonalds set in what was once a Church. Modern women hate men who are virgins and love rape.

caamib #fundie rantsofanincel.wordpress.com

You guys have no idea how correct you are with the Soviet comparison. In Soviet Union people who didn’t believe communism/socialism could work were treated as mentally ill. It was simply incomprehensible to believe that. It’s the same with feminism/liberalism and men like this idiot I’ve been trashing around here.

You guys have never lived in the communist state though (probably, I guess). But my ancestors did and I have the encyclopedia from that time. In that entry under Capitalism you can literally see a cartoonish picture of rich fat cat torturing the hungry masses by throwing a roasted chicken manipulated by a rope in front of them. That’s literally how capitalism had been perceived at the time and gives you a good insight into the psychology of men like Johnny. Notice how he didn’t even bother to comment on the part where I told him that shirnks themselves rejected to “treat” me or that any sincere discussion with a shrink would result in me being arrested. This he doesn’t want to talk about because the former doesn’t fit his narrative and he is cautious enough not to openly admit that he does want to see me arrested regarding the latter.

When people firmly believe in the horrible ideas they have and think they are as natural as breathing and have the power of police and psychiatry behind them it gets very nasty and turns their previously free countries into next USSR.

(To clarify above)
Well, they didn’t exactly live in a communist one, not even USSR was communist, but the point was more about totalitarian systems. And keep in mind, my ancestors aren’t even from USSR but a place with the most liberal strain of totalitarianism during the Cold War.

caamib #sexist whygodwhy.org

I have and I still believe I'd have sex with a woman against her consent. The difference now is that when I wrote that I thought that rape is forceful sex against a woman's consent. I was wrong, since I didn't know enough history and was brainwashed my feminist propaganda. Rape is a crime against women's owner or her chastity and consent is irrelevant for women. In fact, should you expect it you're bound to be seen as a complete loser by a woman. All that anti-rape propaganda is actually aimed to keep dumbasses who believe women even want to consent away from getting any sex whatsoever.

So while I'd still forcibly have a sex with a woman I'd never rape, since I wouldn't have forcible sex with a woman who is somebody's property or chaste.

Caamib #fundie dailyantifeminist.wordpress.com

Also, something the OP said, that both Progressives and Nazis want him dead because he is a Jew. That might be technically correct, but Nazis have much less power than Progressives in the current society. I often talk about politics and how presidential politics in the US is irrelevant etc. And that much is true, but had Hillary won Progressives would have had much more power and she did came very close. One can only hope that Trump will continue with his policies that amount to nothing less than ethnic cleansing of its voters to at least slow down the Democratic Party.

caamib #fundie reddit.com

What women really want from a husband is commitment. This is what they need to feel comfortable having children with the husband and raising a family. She wants commitment to be assured that the husband will always be there to support the family, especially when the wife is pregnant or with infants which put her in a weak position. So why are women so upset by male extramarital sex? Because modern women have been brainwashed to believe that male extramarital sex is an indication of lack of commitment. Historically you cannot find any instance of women complaining about casual extramarital sex by husbands before Paul started complaining about this in the New Testament. Of course women were jealous of mistresses throughout history, and this make sense since this is a real threat to her husband's commitment to her. It was Paul who introduced this terrible concept of male sexual fidelity to human culture. And even today, it is the degree of influence of Paul-based Christian culture on a society that determines the level of women's jealousy about male extramarital sex. Feminism is an extension of this culture and takes it to new extremes.

caamib #fundie fstdt.com

The entire nature of the bullshit white men are taught today makes them inadequate, as it goes against female nature.
Does consent exist in nature?
No.
So who thinks about consent?
Losers think about consent.
Can women be fully lesbian?
No, they can't.
So why do some women turn fully lesbian?
Because they're disgusted by men.
Does contraception exist in nature?
No.
So who uses contraception?
Losers use contraception.
Are dates a good way to get modern Western women?
No, dates are a horrible way to get modern Western women, since these women don't want to be treated civilly or be talked to.
So who goes on dates?
Losers go on dates.
Who washes their ass?
Entitled, boring straight white guys wash their ass.
You never see blacks, Muslims or such groups do any of this. Yet nobody's accusing them of anything.
Men who are not inadequate do what they want with women and colonize them with pregnancies. Yet the society teaches men not to do that.

Inadequacy comes from applying the standards that go against human nature.

Why do so many men have problems with women?

Because women hate men. And for good reason.

Men who aren't to be hated have no notion of nonsense like consent, contraception or female's will.

Vogon Award

for worst attempt at poetry

caamib #sexist caamib.wordpress.com

As I often claim, the entire mainstream modern Western society is a mixture of dogma, insanity and lies.

For example, I am often told that we incels only see women as fuckmeat. And in a sense I can understand those saying it, since it is important to remember that these monsters have no sense of what any relationship is – pumping and dumping is all their parents and friends knew. So it comes of little surprise that they are like this as well – they have no other concepts to even comprehend. When they hear about male-female relationships they hear sex, for nothing else exists to them. It is important to remember that.

Because seeing women as fuckmeat is exactly how thugs, the sacred group worshiped by women, sees them. A thug breeds a woman and then can’t stand her anymore so he goes on to breed the next woman – an optimal behavior in a feral, sick world where relationships are a concept as foreign as halberds or Aztec rituals.

If what these crazies were saying was true about incels they wouldn’t be incels !

So what is the truth?

Incels are often (but not always, there are also completely declined, modernist incels) those who make the mistake of offering women humane treatment, relationship and such things. Things that modern women no longer understand and are thus hated. It is like trying to put a wild animal in a cage. It won’t like the cage nor you. And liberalism is supporting this. Its telling incels that it is wrong to treat women like cattle and that it is good to treat women like they deserve respect. So what happens? Incels do so, fail and then get blamed and told they actually acted like they see women as cattle. But they didn’t! They acted just the way you told them – they treated women like entities worthy of respect. Had they treated them like cattle they’d be successful.

And onwards goes this crazy lie, repacked and sold over and over again, sadly to usually the same naive idiots.

It’s the same with another modernist myth, the idea that modern women don’t like rape.

The only “rapists” sent to prison are falsely accused men who women want to get rid of because they’re not immoral and stupid enough. That is a crime today, not rape. In fact, if you don’t actually rape your chances of being accused of rape are much, much higher.

Honestly, if you’re not able to recognize it by now maybe it is better that you don’t reproduce. I’d just recommend also not working so you don’t make even more men incel, but I fear even that is beyond the comprehension skills of such morons.

[Bolding from original]

caamib #fundie caamib.wordpress.com

FOUR TYPES OF MALES

There are basically four types of males or male mating strategies in the world.

ALPHA MALES

General description: These are dominant, strong men who are usually the leaders. Their intelligence and morality are less important but must have at least average intelligence and are often quite intelligent. Alphas are men like a Fortune 500 CEO, mafia leader like Tony Soprano or statesmen like Vladimir Putin.

Mating strategy: The way these males reproduce is by dominance/high status/strength.

Examples: a strong king, warrior etc (in the past), strong mafia leader, statesman, CEO of a Fortune 500 company

BETA MALES

General description: Weaker than alphas. Not suited for leadership positions. Providers. Their intelligence and morality are less important and while they’re almost always of average to good morality they don’t think about morality much. Their role as a provider requires them to usually have at least average intelligence.

Mating strategy: These men offer their resources for female emotional and sexual fidelity.

Examples: A good foot-soldier, worker, employee

OMEGA MALES

General description: Weakest type. They lack the respect of other men, except the most superficial “respect” from fellow idiots so they’re not fit to lead any organization aspiring for success. They are of low morals and often low intelligence. They don’t necessarily have to be stupid, but they are always immoral. However, since stupid omegas won’t care about child support they also won’t care about contraception, which means they will have as many children as they can. This means that being a stupid omega is currently the best type in terms of reproduction.

Mating strategy: These men use seduction. Their lack morals and often poor intelligence means they’re not fit for long-term relationships. Their evolutionary advantage is their immorality. Since they’re despised by all other types and are not in any alliance with them they will not hesitate to seduce other men’s girlfriends and wives.

Examples: Throughout most of history/ in societies that aren’t omega societies – a conniving man with a bad reputation for seducing women.

In omega societies/many current societies (and practically all Western ones) – an immoral, stupid deadbeat who gets women due to being a moron. For example, a PUA but not just them. Most men today are omegas.

COALPHA MALES

General description: Weaker than alphas but stronger than betas and omegas. Their possess a high level of intelligence and morality. But the fact that they’re smarter than betas is even a sort a hindrance to them in a modern society, as these men won’t be foolish enough to support a used up slut in her 30s and her child so no women will want them at all (I will explain why later).

Mating strategy: Mating strategies of these men depend on the kind of society they found themselves into, which will be explained very soon. In alpha societies these men are usually in position very similar to betas but if the alpha society hold values like intelligence and morality in relatively high regard they might be more attractive to women due to these qualities. But, their best mating strategy is to form a coalpha group, which assimilates both alphas and betas into a monogamous society where each man has a single wife and excludes omegas.

Examples: leading class in the golden periods of Athens, Roman Republic, England 1500-1800 AD, early USA, members of CoAlpha forums, any man with high intelligence and morals who wants increased co-operation between men.

Caamib #fundie caamib.wordpress.com

The word rape has various meanings today. Some, like the one which will be about its sane legal definition, are sadly mostly historical in current Western culture, though they still subsist in some saner cultures even today. So what are these definitions?

Sane definition of the act of rape – This definition is also consistent with Common Law (“Carnal knowledge of a woman forcibly and against her will”) and even with evolutionary psychology (“Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects” is the definition used by Thornhill & Palmer in A Natural History of Rape).

So rape can only be performed by a penis and of course women can’t rape men.

Sane legal definition of rape – Sane legal systems differentiate between act of rape and a crime of rape. A sane legal definition of rape doesn’t believe all acts of rape are crimes of rape. What nonsense would it be to believe that and to treat the whims of some sluts as actually defacing a virgin or a married woman !

A sane legal definition of rape would define rape as a property crime against the woman’s father or husband. Also, rapes against prostitutes should be prosecuted. But it would certainly never account for rapes of sluts, and would consider raping a slut a justified response that should be praised, not persecuted.

Current insane definition of the act/crime of rape – I am saying act/crime of rape because insane modern Western cultures basically don’t differentiate between the act of rape and a crime of rape. In any case, this definition had been, especially since 2000, expanded to include much more than just the actual act of rape. It now includes any form of coercion, inserting objects into sexual orifices, even the insane claim that a woman can rape a male ! There are feminists/liberals insane enough to believe Brock Turner raped some unconscious woman he fingered or that I raped a woman who offered my sex herself in a phone call, simply because I put her picture on my blog when she decided to torture me (as she later admitted herself).

An actual moral definition of rape used by feminists/liberals – this is what almost all feminists and liberals actually see as rape. It is defined as any act a straight white male does to get sex. Asking a woman out by a straight white male is rape to liberals. Going on a date if you’re a straight white male is rape. On the other hand, no actual act of rape, even rape of smallest children, is rape if it is done by Sacred Classes like blacks, Muslims or Hispanics.

I will admit that there are some feminists and liberals who don’t believe so, but these mostly stop calling themselves feminists or liberals once they realize what these ideologies are about.

It is also true that this definition isn’t yet widely used in law but and police officers and judges who don’t use this definition are seen as vermin by liberals and there are places in the West where it’s slowly getting there .

Female definition of rape– Women simply define rape as sex they regret, and pay basically no intention to any other circumstances, including physical pain. So this definition is completely silly and shouldn’t be regarded by anybody sane as anything more than what 5 year-old children think. That some legal systems are starting to bring this definition into equation (though usually by ignoring the sex with a member of Sacred classes females regret) is simply a symptom of a decaying society.

livinginhell101 #fundie reddit.com

I detest Caamib for a great many reasons but he is a god compared to you. You should bow down and worship him as he is clearly superior to you. Personally I think you would be a better person if you had a god. Accept Caamib as your deity and worship him daily.

So sick of this blue pilled idealistic cuck nonsensical bullshit.

Go throw your obvious falsehoods and idealism somewhere else. If any of it was true life would not be hell for non alpha males. Normies are in denial or they would realize being a beta bux or beta cuck bitch isn't a life worth living either.

Just lol at being a male in any western country in 2016. Bet 2017 will be even worse.

fschmidt #psycho reddit.com

Anyway, former president Obama not only justified violence against civilians with his drone strike program, but he actually carried them out and murdered numerous civilians. So how can even compare Caamib to Obama, regardless of your political views. Obama is obviously worse than Caamib by any standard.

fschmidt #conspiracy #dunning-kruger saidit.net

My kids are grown up. I home-schooled them and I taught them that people are generally scum and shouldn't be trusted. I think this served them well. I don't see Caamib as being any worse than modern scum. The political elite are mostly pedos, they just aren't honest about it.

Sans_Logique #sexist #crackpot #psycho reddit.com

(hydrolythe)
Inceldom is lame.

That's because it's built upon a sociological theory that can easily be proven false by basic psychology. (If all women wanted to sleep with chads, then why is hybristophilia a mental disorder?) At least Aristotle appealed to the essence of men and women when defending patriarchy. This is a notion many still uphold today.

If a man from Ancient Greece has a better theory than you for explaining things you have a resounding failure of a theory in your hands.

(https://www.reddit.com/r/incelconversations/comments/as3rch/inceldom_is_lame/)
Your post is extremely poorly thought out. I'd call you an idiot but it would be an insult to all the idiots.

That's because it's built upon a sociological theory that can easily be proven false by basic psychology. (If all women wanted to sleep with chads, then why is hybristophilia a mental disorder?)

Because the term/concept were developed at a time when feminism hasn't yet completely mutilated Western societies.

]At least Aristotle appealed to the essence of men and women when defending patriarchy. This is a notion many still uphold today. If a man from Ancient Greece has a better theory than you for explaining things you have a resounding failure of a theory in your hands.

What does any of this have to do with anything you state before ? Also, you almost certainly don't even know what specific theories fschmidt has and incels have vastly different theories on what causes their problem. You just lump it all together and you don't even explain what Aristotle was saying and why his ideas are better than... whose ideas exactly?

Fucking lunatic.

(hydrolythe)

Because the term/concept were developed at a time when feminism hasn't yet completely mutilated Western societies.

Ah yes, the "feminism mutilates". If you think that writing "women are equal to men" in the constitution is a form of mutilation you have explained what's wrong with you indeed.

What does any of this have to do with anything you state before ?

If a misogynist from more than 2000 years ago has a better theory for justifying misogyny than you do you know you have a massive failure of a theory on your hands.[quoe]You just lump it all together and you don't even explain what Aristotle was saying and why his ideas are better than... whose ideas exactly?

Indeed. I've yet to see a theory incels have for their suffering other than the blackpill. The fact that you think incels are a diverse group of people when in actuality they force eachother into one rigid streamlined thought where any diversion has to be eliminated shows an incredible lack of awareness. And I don't care if liberals have another theory for their suffering. I care what they themselves actually think.

And in case you haven't noticed. Aristotle was much better (although still wrong) than incels ever will be.

(Sans_Logique)

If you think that writing "women are equal to men" in the constitution is a form of mutilation you have explained what's wrong with you indeed.

Anybody can write down whatever they want. I can write down that "men can fly and women have 7 breasts" and nothing will happen. But when I try to live by such nonsense is where problems happen in society. Men and women are not equal and trying to live by that lie kills a society pretty quickly.

I don't know what's "wrong" with me and I don't think it's up to you to tell me, given that you don't know anything about me or Aristotle or incels or whatever the fuck you ramble about,

You also did nothing to address my point, which is that hybristophilia was rare and thus a disorder before feminist plague wiped out any intelligence and morality. Today's Western women are very attracted to violent, immoral men and putting a bullet through a woman's brain will attract other women much more than any honesty, decency or morality. Raping and executing a woman is attractive to women in feminist societies much more than being intelligent or decent can ever be - being anything more than scum repels modern Western women

If a misogynist from more than 2000 years... something about theories

Aristotle wasn't a misogynist. Judging by your insanity anybody before 150 years ago or so would be a misogynist in this case. Nobody who lived before that time would even think of something as retarded as giving women the vote or believing that they were equal to men. His theory (which I am not familiar with and you don't bother to explain it) wasn't to "justify" anything but came out of his own pondering. You can't apply 2019 idiocy to a man who lived in 4th century BC.

Indeed.

Indeed what? Do you even know what you're replying to?

I've yet to see a theory incels have for their suffering other than the blackpill.

Umm, really? I don't know how you define the term "blackpill" at all but there are several explainations to why incel happens in a society that don't claim looks are a cause. Read

http://www.mikraite.org/Human-Evolution-td17.html

https://caamib.wordpress.com/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/

shows an incredible lack of awareness

Actually, you are the one with the incredible lack of awareness, equating the term that has existed since 1997 and that many people define and see differently with a stupid sub culture that appeared in 2016. If you actually read https://caamib.wordpress.com/2018/06/05/dissecting-the-disaster-how-the-term-incel-got-taken-over-by-the-worst-people-and-what-to-do-about-it/ you'd see that this all started when a bunch of morons from sites like Lookism and Sluthate overtook the term after Caamib was banned from Reddit. His way of running things was different and focused on rape, low ages of consent, Islam and positive thinking. You could have investigated and read about older incel forums, like Love-shy.com or the now defunct Incel Support to see what they're about. Instead you just blather like an idiot.

I care what they themselves actually think.

Yet you never bothered to research it at all and are showing breathtaking ignorance.

Your last sentence is also breathtakingly ignorant as we have already established that no one man can be better at anything than a very disparate group under a very disparate term.

Do I need to repeat myself? I'd call you an idiot but it would be an insult to all the idiots.

Jacob Ripley #fundie caamib.wordpress.com

(Commenting on Caamib's article)

My favorites lines are

“But how many of them are actually against women’s suffrage or return of the patriarchal European values? What do they think would happen even if Muslims were to leave? Nothing, West would revert to state it was in 10,000 BC before the end of the century.”

I thought this was so funny and poignant. A great criticism. In America already the only thing keeping people from being totally feral and doing witch-hunts daily is the older, more traditional edifice. I have no doubt in as little as one generation (or hell 5-10 years), that everything will start breaking down.

Also my other favorite:

“History belongs to those who show up. It will be a far cry from what the West was when it was sane but much less dysfunctional than current West, a society demented and cruel enough to do what even ISIL would never even thought of – take away any ability for decent men to have any chance of having a partner and expect them to slave away for thugs and sluts.”

I never even thought of that way, but man that really hit me hard. Just thinking of how the American media constantly demonizes them but at the end of the day they have a much more functional and feasible moral code than us. At the end of the day their way of life is sustainable (meaning having over 2.1 children per couple) and our way of life is not.

fschmidt #fundie reddit.com

You are clearly a modern moron. There is no hatred of women in [a rant by caamib that the OP praises as "required reading". Excerpts here]. The hatred is of modern Western culture, and is well deserved since modern Western culture is pure evil.

Next page