#transphobia

Like homophobia, but for transgender people

David J, Stewart #fundie #homophobia #transphobia #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

Queer rights, transgenderism, bisexuality, homosexual marriage, and gender transition—these are not the real battle ground. The real battle ground is against God, Christ, the Holy Spirit, the Church, the Holy Bible, and the Gospel. Any blasphemy against God comes from God-haters, Christ-haters, Bible-haters, Gospel-haters, and are fueled by the arch-hater, who is Satan himself! Since marriage is vital to God's design—His way to pass on order in society, sensible civilization, peace, temporal blessing and even righteousness from one generation to the next—the family has always been under assault. God made humans MALE and FEMALE (Genesis 1:27), nothing in between! After the fall of man in Genesis, we see all manner of sexual immorality in Genesis—polygamy, prostitution, incest, and rampant homosexuality by Genesis chapter 19. The true sinister agenda of demons and Satan is to DESTROY everything that God has made!!! They are the enemies of God, Christ, and the truth of Scripture, and the Gospel. Their objective is not simply to redefine gender and marriage, but to effectively destroy what God has designed!

Families provide a small sovereign unit that acts as a small barrier against the corruption that seeks to dominate. Destroy the family and the small sovereign barrier is disintegrated. The goal in all of this is not homosexual same sex marriage, but the total elimination of ALL MARRIAGE! Which then means, that you don't possess any privacy, you don't have that small sovereign unit, and your children are not yours! They're public children and they belong to the education system, and they belong to the country, and they belong to the village, but not to you! And so in Oregon your 15 year old child can have a sex-change, without parental permission, and the state will pay for it! This is not about same sex marriage, this is about the total obliteration of the family. So that there will be no more family, no more covenants, no more private sovereign units that stand up against the corruption!

Where did this all begin? It began with contraception, which allowed people to have sex without the risk of having children. This fueled the sexual revolution. But that wasn't good enough, so they legalized abortion to be more complete, eliminating all risk! So we've come all the way from sex without children, to children without sex!!! Laboratories can manufacture a baby nowadays! Two lesbians can have a baby today! A lesbian can have, planted in her womb, a living being from somebody else, manufacturing a child. This eliminates the need for a man and woman in a normal marriage. So we've deteriorated from sex without having children, to the insanity of having children without sex! They can just make them, so who needs a family? Right? It's going to get worse and worse and worse! Same sex, polygamy, anything to destroy the family!!! Just as Sodom tried to rape the angels sent from Heaven, who appeared in human form in Genesis, so also do queers today rape all that is pure, holy and chaste! HOMOSEXUALITY IS OF THE DEVIL!!!

John Howard #sexist #homophobia #transphobia #ufo wehuntedthemammoth.com

Congress needs to protect people from exploitation by giving them full information about their reproductive rights. Males only have a right to produce with their own genitals, they don't have a right to gestate a baby in a box or make eggs from stem cells.

[...]

[M]y comment was about the future. Trans women will never be allowed to gestate, even with future technology from aliens. Congress will ban it and end gay marriage so kids are taught the truth about the future and their reproductive rights.

Random-animezing #homophobia #transphobia random-animezing.tumblr.com

The Problems With The LGBT Community

Honey, this was all very well said and I wish more could approach this as calmly and thoughtfully as you. I wish the “friends” I’d had who were lost to the LGBT cult would’ve been able to, or that I could’ve found this video sooner and shown it to them before they burned all their bridges with the people who really cared about them: friends, families, even significant others. It might’ve really, truly helped them. I hope your voice reaches a lot of folks within the community and beyond it.

This is the sort of thing that will help people on all sides be kinder.

AggressiveConcert5 #transphobia reddit.com

Calling someone "cisgender" is like calling someone a 'muggle'.

A muggle is a just non magical person. Technically we are all muggles because none of us have magical powers.

However, when you call someone a "muggle" you are implying that you think some people really do have magic powers. You're advertising the fact that you're an idiot.

Same with "cisgender". It technically means 'someone who's gender is congruent with their sex.'

Thing is, this is true of everyone! Even those people who believe that they have transitioned gender.

When you use the term "cisgender" you are advertising the fact that you believe some men have become women. You're being a bloody idiot.

Some incels #transphobia reddit.com

Re: Trannies_irl

image

(ArchibaldForester)

LMAO only a small percentage will ever be passing

I'd say there are more letters in your sentence than trannies that pass.

(MentalAnon)

A good rule of thumb I heard is if you can't pass pre-HRT, you're not gonna pass with it either.

(cattypat)

Apparently that operation involves painful after care like dilation that must be done every day. Shoving what basically is a dildo up there into an open wound that gets these weird "hair balls" because they essentially invert the penis and genitals.

Oh and infections are common. Imagine having a cut that you never let heal and is constantly exposed.

Surgery wasted on these failures of people when it could be saving lives, or at least giving gastric bands to all the massively obese people eating everything in sight.

you can thank anime for this rise of degeneracy.

anime makes it look like a possible concept

People who believe they can come any where near the literal 2D drawing Utopian ideal of a flawless ageless young female should give themselves a reality check before checking in at the local psych ward.

(midnightblood)

Most are delusional if they think they can pass for real women

If they can pass, they get the same easy mode as women do but with one exception - they have to date men who are open to transwomen

Otherwise? If she passes for a woman her life is E A S Y M O D E

(Dailyblackpill)

There are two types of trans people. The one type is were they they are naturally feminine and transition is really just an improvement and a buff to the stats they already naturally had.

The other type is the incel in denial type. Typically will try to transition no matter how they look. Have lived a life were they have suffered mentally. Usually have 0 natural femininity and can never be a real tranny no matter how hard they try. This is the most common type.

(SquatPowerhouse)

You incels could learn something from trannies. They too believe world owes them sex, but they knew how to fit themselves into the oppression hierarchy and how to complain about being celibate using neo-marxist lingo, so they are supported by leftists. Maybe you could use some of that intersectional crap, so that sjw chicks could virtue signal by having sex with oppresses sub-humans. Nobody ever got that woke.

Can you say that again but without the buzzwords so a normal human can understand what your saying

Trannies too like to complain because they are sexually rejected. They invented something called "cotton ceiling" to name their "oppression" and they are outraged by the fact that lesbians and straight men reject them. Just see the Ginuwine scandal.

You should all become leftists and then fight to gain status of an oppressed category, just like trannies.

Until people overcome their evolutionary prerogative to not want to fuck ugly people/people with the same genitals, being a leftist isn't gonna do jack shit

It gives more weight to their virtue signalling, because it makes a greater challenge.

(KING_OF_BONERS)

Ive seen plenty like on the right and they are CHAD ONLY

Ive aeen plenty like on the left and they are CHAD ONLY

Brutal

justforlulzandkeks #transphobia reddit.com

Re: Daily reminder that most trannies end up looking like this

image

Much worse. and even the ones who manage to put on 100 pounds of mmakeup and can look passable under certain lights, are still easily busted when they show their voice. They always sound like bugs. Imagine what these disgusting creatures look like without the makeup. Disgusting

Daily reminder that these are the chapocels/reddit trannies who tell you to post hog/you're a freak

I was JUST ABOUT to make some fukn lunch, and you ruined it.

umm what are you trying to say? why would your lunch be ruined? those are clearly all beautiful women, and if you dare insinuate that they're not you're obviously just a bigot

👏 WELCOME 👏 TO 👏 2019 👏 GRANDPA

Literally nothing to do with inceldom but ok thank you for posting.

Actually a lot of IT posters are trannies/furries or other types of degenerates. They shit on incels to feel better about themselves and because "fighting misogyny" means they're "real women"

Literally everyone shits on incels, with the majority being fully heterosexual born women, dont see the need to single out transexuals.

It's just a friendly reminder of who is calling you a loser on reddit and that there's a good chance they're beneath you

Imagine being on a subreddit about how people get judged for their looks and then proceeding to judge people by their looks

Let the tranny be, as long as it doesn’t affect me let it do what it wants

This tranny threw a fit in a gamestop store because he was called sir

He's already affected the public, no reason he wouldn't affect you as well

Ohhh noooo! Someone through a fit in a gamestop! The world is gonna end! Better get laid while you still can. Oh wait...

was this supposed to be an insult? LMAO

Ivoriy #transphobia #racist reddit.com

I'm seeing (an obvious) pattern, why is it only white men/women who transition? I rarely see people of other races do so. Could it be cultural upbringing or something like that? Bc for someone to believe u can be something, there needs to exist the idea first. Basically you could say It's learned not something they are born with

MillimetersOfBone & ShahOfShinebox #sexist #transphobia reddit.com

[Note: They are commenting on a video titled "8th place: A high school girl's life after transgender students joined her sport", posted by The Daily Signal, a website operated by the right-wing organization The Heritage Foundation]

Re: This roastie crying about not winning anymore, JFL - Life fuel!!!

(MillimetersOfBone)

It's so fun watching feminism eat itself with this whole trans thing.

It's a battle between entitIed women who want to be coddled because of their holes, and virtue signalers who are willing to cuck themselves into oblivion to seem as "accepting" and "tolerant" as possible. And the virtue signalers are winning.

Now, all of the sudden, men in wigs with abs and dicks are flooding into women's locker rooms, and unsurprisingly dominating in women's sports. Women are slowly losing all of their special privileges to trannies and they have to either plug their ears and pretend these men are women, or speak the truth and get shut out by their friends, lose their jobs, and be banned from public life.

Just goes to show, sometimes you get lucky and the 🤡🌎 hits the wrong target.

(ShahOfShinebox)

Honestly I’m a huge supporter of trans people in sports

It makes no difference to men if trans men join their sport, and the minute they have a trans woman vs woman boxing match here in LA I’ll be happily buying a ticket because that will be some hilarious shit

WotanReborn & I-N-S-T-A-L-L #sexist #transphobia reddit.com

image

(WotanReborn)

F2M trannies baffle me in general since they at best will turn into manlets with feminine features. It's like switching life from game journalist difficulty to hardcore mode.

There are several shitposts where a bunch of them even admit how much harder life became once their transitioned to male.

(I-N-S-T-A-L-L)

They have no fucking clue. I unironically want to promote F-to-M transgenderism to trick many foids into becoming men. I know that they can always go back or make life easier by adopting the identity of "transgender" itself, but those first few days will be worth it seeing their naive views on men getting shattered.

JulienMayfair #transphobia reddit.com

Part of our problem is LGB historical ignorance

Stonewall is really just the tip of the iceberg, but it points to why LGB opinion has been susceptible to manipulation by trans activists.

For example, I recently decided to re-read George Chauncey's groundbreaking 1994 book Gay New York about gay communities in NYC 1890-1940. It dovetailed at the time with work I was doing on Whitman and other gay authors. Chauncey's book was researched to the hilt, full of data he pulled from many sources including personal journals, letters, police and legal records, and records of social purity organizations. If nothing else, Chauncey makes clear that there was an active, thriving gay subculture in New York (and other major cities) long before Stonewall, one that required a lot of courage and creativity from those who created it. The story we've been told about how everyone was in hiding before a brave transwoman started a riot is simply not true.

Then I decided to look at youtube to see what kind of gay history was being presented. In an "LGBTQ+" video on the 1920s, all that complexity (the lives of thousands of everyday gay men and lesbians) is glossed over, but the writer makes sure to mention a single transsexual FTM doctor, Alan Hart, one of the first in the U.S. to have SRS.

The thing is, Hart was able to change his legal sex and legally marry not one, but two women (after the first ended in divorce), first in 1918 and then again in 1925. Consider that this is 40 years before interracial marriage was legalized in all U.S. states and 90 years before same-sex marriage. And though Hart paid a price in his career for being trans, he was nonetheless able to have a long and successful medical career at the same time that police were raiding bars and baths and judges were sending gay men to prison for years for sodomy -- when any man revealed to be a homosexual might well lose his career and end up in disgrace.

Yet we're told that trans people are the most oppressed people ever.

We should never forget that the fight for LGB civil rights was a long and difficult one with many casualties along the way and that it's still very much being fought. We survived by carving out niches for ourselves over and over amid the growth of major cities, adapting to changing forms of oppression over the decades. Our civil rights were not won for us by one mythical transwoman in 1969.

innocent_butungu & Administrative_Worth #sexist #homophobia #transphobia reddit.com

image

(innocent_butungu)

Can lesbians be incel? I'm honestly not sure, we need some high-IQ-cels to conduct a scientific study.

If lesbians existed, probably. But reality is lesbians do not exist. Lesbians are just etero girls going bisexual for shit and giggles.

The only true lesbians are basically FtM trans without gender dysphoria

(Administrative_Worth)

Reminder that women can get women easier than us. And most have already at some point.

So fucking true. Women's preference for fuckng goes chad, chad-lite, and high tier stacies. Stacy's becky's. 5.5/10 guys, Dogs, and then genetic trash both male and female. Male, below 3.5 women see you as trash, foids, below 2.5 you're genetic trash.

karmamiakat #homophobia #transphobia karmamiakat.tumblr.com

im sorry about being a bitch lately about the whole pride thing. People who have known me on my blog and DA page know I’m a huge anti yaoi and yuri person. I’ll be short about it , I think it’s ignorant for acting like you know better than the authors and creators, being I am a writer and would hate it for my own characters. The most annoying and number one thing is that it’s shoved in my face, especially this month and the Winx fandom is worst when it comes to this. “Headcannons never hurt anyone…” True but when it’s f@$^ing shoved in my face whenever I search my favorite show and people act bitchy, acting like everyone agrees with them, it’s like you might as well be hitting me over the head with it! So naturally if people going to keep shoving it in my face, it’s only natural I wanna shove my hatred of it just as far. Also, if LGBT is supposedly equal to straight folks, why do you need an entire month to celebrate who date/have it with? It seems more like Pride Month is propaganda than it is about equality, like Autism awareness. All of a sudden people care about that for just one month? Bull dust! Note when you comment calling me “white cis male”, I’m grey-asexual, Japanese Native American decent, am a woman and autistic. I choose to not parade about it because that’s not what equality is you idiots. I look forward to your comments!

CrunkLord420 #wingnut #transphobia kiwifarms.net

Despite all the anti-troonery moderation coming out of Nintendo, it will never stop these gamejournos from playing their nintoddler gayms. Laura can't even stop playing, and tweeting about Pokemon for a single waking moment.

Nothing gets in between Nintendo and a social justice sperg, not even social justice. They'd be lining up to gas the Jews if it meant being able to play the latest Splatoon a week early.

HoneySmokedRoses, Lars_The_Leprechaun #transphobia reddit.com

The entire tranny movement consists of unlovable beta males and old perverted societal outcast men finally getting the attention they strive for. That's the soul motivator. It's rooted completely in narcissism and vanity, and the internet is the perfect ultimate echo chamber to support it. Honk honk.

Think about this: we made a machine that cuts off dicks.

The front of this machine is all screens that show nothing but cartoons and pornography. If you stare at it long enough, a door opens. Then you go inside. If the machine works (and it doesn't always, but it sometimes does), at the end of the machine, your dick gets cut off while you smile and give a thumbs up to the camera.

This machine wasn't created by one person. Or on purpose. But we created it. And it's running right now.

Wanna go look at the screens on the front of the machine?

GenderCriticalDad #transphobia gendercriticaldad.blogspot.com

[re: why gatekeeping kids makes you a good parent]

My daughter is a trans child, she said so. Her school agreed. Her gender support group agrees. Her university friends are so proud to agreed. Her gay boyfriend agreed. The parents, who gave me a dirty look when I picked her up from a party at their house and asked for her by her name, they agree.

If we had been fully supportive of her trans journey, of the narrative that she was born in the wrong body, which caused her gender dysphoria and that needed to be treated by transition. If we had been supportive and affirming, she could have no breasts, have had a curtailed puberty, and have been on Testosterone for two years. She would have no one in her life, holding to the truth that she was a girl, is a woman.

I protected my daughter from puberty blockers, a range of drugs that were developed to treat prostate cancer in middle aged blokes. That have never been tested on children. Drugs that are claimed to be reversible, but they are only now starting to test on animals in puberty, and they are finding that they reduce IQ by 8 points.

I protected my daughter from having a double mastectomy, with the possibility of infection, phantom pain, nipples dropping off and its damn (sic)permeance.

I protected my daughter from starting to take testosterone, in quantities that are orders of magnitude larger than ever found naturally in women. As well as the effects that she sought, the body and facial hair, the different body fat distribution, the voice changes. All changes that are not fully reversible after a few years. She is not facing vaginal atrophy or post orgasm cramps, so painful and so long lasting, that pleasurable sex is not possible.

I protected my daughter from having everyone in her life, collaborating in the lie, that she believed, that she was a boy trapped in a girl’s body.

Pastor Patrick Boyle #fundie #homophobia #transphobia youtube.com

Look at verse number 14. You say, “I thought we were in church; we’re not supposed to hate anything.”

Well, we hate the things God hates, amen! And we love the things God loves. And God hates homos, amen. God hates the faggots and the queers and the LGBT crowd.

And you say, “Well, I don’t like it”.

[A couple of people can be seen getting up and making their way towards the exit, although many more people in the congregation are responding with “Amen”s.]

Well, God hasn’t changed. And God’s not changing. And if you don’t like it, there’s the door, amen. We hate homosexuals around here because God hates them, amen. And if anybody else feels compelled to follow those out, follow ’em out, amen. We’re gonna believe that all the way until Jesus comes back, and capital punishment for everybody that’s a homo, amen.

Pastor Patrick Boyle, #fundie #homophobia #transphobia youtube.com

Hello everybody, Pastor Boyle here from Revival Baptist Church in Orlando, Florida with a very important announcement to make. We’re gonna be hosting this June 14th, 15th, and 16th a conference exposing the reprobates. The name of our conference is “Make America Straight Again”. That’ll be a Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, the 14th, 15th, and 16th of June, and we’re gonna have preachers like Pastor Tommy McMurtry, Pastor Steven Anderson, Pastor Roger Jimenez, Pastor Aaron Thompson, and many others who have already been known for making a vocal stand against the sodomites and their filth that they’ve been spreading in to the homes and families across the world and the United States of America. And we’ve chosen this place and time because this is their Gay Pride Week in Orlando, and they’re gonna be out proud of who they are and daring someone to say something, and we’re gonna go ahead and take them up on it, and this conference is gonna be explaining our view, or rather, God’s view on it.

In fact, the verse that we’ve chosen is Ecclesiastes 1:15, and the Bible says, “That which is crooked cannot be made straight”, and another verse that follows that is Ecclesiastes 7:13, and the Bible reads, “Consider the work of God: for who can make that straight, which he hath made crooked?” And God’s asking the question, once someone’s been turned over, who can then bring them back? And the answer is no one. And this is gonna shock some people, but don’t be too surprised. This same doctrine - it’s nothing new - this same doctrine was once thundered in pulpits all across the United States of America just a generation or two ago. Well, we’re bringing it back up. We’re opening our Bibles. We’re gonna blow the dust off this doctrine and expose it for what it is, and I want you to be there. If you can be there, get time off work, drive in, fly in, we’ll make accommodations, be here for it. That’s June 14th, 15th, and 16th.

[The rest of the video shows clips of the pastors who will be speaking at the conference making appallingly vile homophobic remarks, often to the cheers of their congregations.]

Pastor Tommy McMurtry #fundie #homophobia #transphobia youtube.com

We’re supposed to see that life. We should look at those - you know, I don’t think you ought to go watch the Gay Pride Parades, OK - but if you do watch a Gay Pride Parade, and you see the disgusting stuff that goes on, when you see all the cross-dressing, what that’s supposed to do to us, that’s supposed to disgust us and scare us into saying, “You know what? I don’t want to reject God.” And that should be a warning, when you see those two guys out in public holding hands or whatever, that ought to be something to point your kids at that “That’s why you don’t reject God. Because you’ll be like that!” But unfortunately, we’re not repulsed by that because it’s been made to look good through Hollywood and the news media. We’re being told, we’re being brainwashed in our schools that that’s normal, that there’s nothing wrong with that, but that is supposed to be a warning to us. That’s supposed to be a warning to all who would reject God to be careful because rejecting God will lead to some horrible places, and right there is it.

Some TERFs #sexist #transphobia reddit.com

(sophiedk)

2 types of trans

Interesting group. I have this fetish to some extent, but no confusion about identity. To my mind, there seems to be 2 different sets of people involved here. There are people with genuine identity issues or those who are biological outliers, a small minority. And then there is the new wave of hyperexualised folks who are being enabled by blankslate ideas about gender. Maybe feminism took a wrong turn when it started indentifying gender with culture rather than biology? Gender is multilayered, culture and roles are a layer on top of biology, but biology is real. There have always been people a bit closer to the middle of the bell curves, but society seemed able to cope with that.

(sosososhocking)

I think quite a lot of AGPers/trans are motivated by a combination of their desire to go full-time with the fetish, and an aversion to being called a pervert. Nobody in their right mind would want to be seen as a perverted guy in a dress. It's much more palatable to be a "trans woman", especially because in many circles anyone who refuses to play along will suffer repercussions.

Sure, there are intersex people but they literally make up about a half percent of the population at best. They are often used by trans activists to claim that gender isn't clear cut, but (1) it is for 99.95% of the population and (2) you guys aren't intersex anyway.

(GinFoss)

You're right, but your number might be wrong. It's estimated at 1/1500 to 1/2000 births according to the North American Intersex Society. So it's actually more like 99.99933% of the population does not fall under the umbrella of intersex. As a matter of statistics, just purely mathematically, that's statistically insignificant, and definitely doesn't prove that sex is a spectrum.

That's why it's so, so, so, so, so stupid to say "assigned male" or "assigned female" at birth. It's not assigned, it's observed. Bringing up the rare case of intersex to challenge that is like saying it's incorrect to say humans have 5 fingers on each hand simply because you can cite a rare mutation causing supernumerary digits. That doesn't mean the number of fingers is a bloody spectrum.

And as another person said, many of those cases don't involve ambiguous genitalia (Klinefelter syndrome, and Complete Androgen Insensitivity are two good examples of males and females respectively who are genetically intersex, but have unambiguous genitals)

(Poolooloo)

A lot of “intersex” people fall clearly on one side or another and might even go their whole lives not knowing they are anything other than an XX female or XY male. People say “intersex” and think someone either completely androgynous with a penis and vagina, or just nothing down there like a Ken doll but it includes a lot of conditions, only a few of which would really make someone’s gender indeterminate.

Even when intersex people are born with ambiguous genitalia, which they often are, they still fall into one sex or another as determined by their chromosomes. For example Kline-felters males have XXY chromosomes. They are still considered male. There is no such thing as a true hermaphrodite because of these reasons and you will never find an intersex person with working female and male reproductive organs.

It’s also really a misnomer to compare people born with such a serious physical condition to a mental condition which being gender dysphoric is.

It would be a bit like saying humans don’t actually have 2 arms because every 10,000 births someone is born with a missing arm, hand, or finger, therefore the number of limbs on a human body is a “spectrum”.

(palerthanrice)

Was it feminists though? To be honest not up to speed on how this shit show started. I know libfems sure to push this junk science.

Some people just want to feel radical. For a lot of women, they start out with feminism because it’s a fight for their own people. If you’re a woman, it feels natural to be involved in this cause, it makes sense that this is something you’d care about, and it feels good to be fighting for something.

But once that feeling of fighting wears off, some people switch causes. Gay rights was another natural progression. Many women are gay and are further discriminated due to that, so fighting for gay rights still feels like fighting for your own people.

I think most normal people saw this coming, but after gay marriage was legalized nationwide, that cause also grew stale. Women who had been chasing that high latched onto the next progression from gay rights, which was trans rights. While the vast majority of trans people are men trying to be women, these habitual radicals believe it’s related to women’s rights because most trans people believe that they are “women on the inside.” So by fighting for the rights of these people, they believe that they’re fighting for the rights of their fellow woman.

All in all, the root of the whole trans issue is AGP men taking advantage of the empathetic nature of women and men being too afraid of ostracization to stick up for what they know is right. As a man, when I talk to any straight man about trans people in a one on one environment, every single time their opinion is between “Fuck that” or “I believe people have the right to do whatever they want with their bodies, but that stuff is clearly mental illness.” I get varying responses when it comes up in one on one conversations with my friends who are women EXCEPT the most “radical” women I know all support it fully.

(Ohhiohyo)

Women’s subjugation is because of gender. Women are not naturally the property of men. It’s not feminist’s fault that men get off on thinking otherwise. Transgenderism is just the newest form of men’s desire to control the power of naming. Some men have now inverted their desire for a big titty sexbot/anime loli/whatever they think a women is in their heads because they don’t have the power to turn a real women into their fantasy.

(palerthanrice)

This is definitely on the right track. I think the submissiveness of trans people is evidence of how they view women should be to men.

I think there’s a lot of deluded feminists who got tired of women’s rights and moved to gay rights (to fight for fellow gay women). Then after gay marriage got legalized nationwide, they moved to trans rights because they were told that these men were actually “women on the inside.”

So it’s not really a problem with feminism or feminists in general, but rather women who just want to feel radical and got fooled into supporting junk science. Luckily, many of these women spend a few years supporting this movement but eventually bail out because it becomes obvious that these people are just mentally ill and not “women on the inside.”

sosososhocking #transphobia reddit.com

Josh Alcorn suffered from Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria. He became involved in trans communities online when he was 14 and just three short years later, he killed himself by walking in front of a semi because (as he indicated in his suicide note) he knew that he could never convincingly transition. The worst-of-the-worst TRAs then harassed his grieving parents. The trans community has blood on their hands that they refuse to acknowledge.

Collectingnasty #sexist #transphobia reddit.com

Why take trans seriously anyway? There is no such thin as a trans male or trans female. There is only feminine males and masculine females. Just because a person wants to behave in a manner stereotypical to an other sexual demographic doesn't entitle them to change their genetic sex.

I don't know enough about trans people for me to make a committed conviction, so I don't deny or accept the ideology or ideas about it

Gender are a set of socially constructed stereotypical behaviours. Most of these new genders are perversions or deviations. Ex: cross dresser is a typical deviation or perversion. But it is now referred to as gender queer which is now a gender. Next thing you know paedophiles with be classified as a gender

Archbishop Cranmer #fundie #homophobia #transphobia archbishopcranmer.com

‘Give me the child for the first seven years and I will give you the man’ is a Jesuit maxim attributed to Saint Ignatius of Loyola, founder of the Society of Jesus. He probably never said it, or if he did, he almost certainly said: ‘Give me the boy for the first seven years and I will show you the man’. The quote is also attributed to Aristotle, but in a sense the source doesn’t matter, for by its attribution to both one of the greatest spiritual minds and one of the greatest philosophical thinkers ever to have existed, it moves beyond cultural constructivism to transcendent truth: the workings of the mind were designed to be subject to time and space.

And into that time and space comes children’s education, by which process their moral, cultural and religious values are inculcated and their politics are moulded – from the history lesson which scorns the ethics of empire to the singing of ‘I vow to thee my country’ in the daily act of collective worship, schools are places where political perspectives become truths and religious exposure becomes morality. There is, of course, much debate concerning the proper aims of education and the right balance (should such a thing exist) between the prescriptive statutes of governments and the freedoms of parents and particular religious groups, but in a liberal democracy there must be the means to impart the knowledge of citizenship which is deemed necessary to sustain that liberal democracy, or the state ceases generation-by-generation to be either liberal or democratic.

Relationship and Sex Education (formerly Sex and Relationship Education) is one of those subjects which straddles the government-parent-religion tensions of responsibility and provision. For some, it is the task of parents to teach sexual morality and reify good relationship; for others, it is the joint responsibility of parents and religious communities, with a civic minimum imparting the essential facts of biology and social reality. For others still, mindful of parental delinquency and religious prejudice in this regard, it is fundamentally a function of the state to ensure that all children are taught the knowledge and life skills they will need to develop healthy relationships and stay safe while having sex.

The question and tension which then arises is related to age-appropriateness: at what point does the scientific naming of private body parts or discussion about where babies come from become consideration of emotional and physical changes; and then at what point those changes become discussions about different kinds of families or the differences between boys and girls; and then at what point those differences become discussions about engaging in sex, contraception or condoms, homosexuality and transgender people. And what about abortion? And then there is sexual experimentation, orgasms, group sexual experiences, oral sex, masturbation—

Would it surprise you to know that discussions about transgender are deemed appropriate for eight-year-olds?

One state primary school in Birmingham, where the children are predominantly Muslim, introduced RSE lessons to promote LGBT equality. The Guardian reported in January that the programme includes “the welcoming of people of any race, colour or religion and those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender”. There is, of course, nothing wrong with welcoming people, but what is the age-appropriate way of explaining lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender to a four-year-old? What are books entitled ‘Mommy, Mama and Me‘ or ‘King & King‘ designed to inculcate about the morality of same-sex relationships and same-sex marriages? Birmingham school LGBT Muslim protestOne parent Fatima Shah is quoted: “Children are being told it’s OK to be gay, yet 98% of children at this school are Muslim. It’s a Muslim community. [Mr Moffat (assistant headteacher)] said all parents are on board with it, but the reality is, no parents are on board with it.” She added: “We have nothing against Mr Moffat – we are as British as they come. We respect the British values— but the problem is, he is not respecting our ethos as a community. We don’t send our children to school to learn about LGBT. We send them to school to learn maths, science and English.”

Andrew Moffat, who is gay and was appointed MBE in 2017 for services to education, responded: “I’m just teaching children from an early age that there are different families out there and, let’s not forget, that in some schools there are children with two mums, so I see it that they’re not being taught anything. All they’re seeing is their family is being accepted. We want all children in Birmingham to know that their family is normal; that their family is accepted and welcomed in schools.”

Last week Mr Moffat gave in, and subjugated the ethos of his school to the religious ethos of the majority Muslim parents: all LGBT lessons have been stopped. He did this because hundreds of those parents decided to withdraw their children from the lessons, which is their legal right. But what if RSE were to become mandatory, as the Government intends? What option would parents then have if they felt their children were being taught matters of sex and sexuality which they deemed to be age-inappropriate? “We are not a bunch of homophobic mothers,” Fatima Shah said. “We just feel that some of these lessons are inappropriate. Some of the themes being discussed are very adult and complex and the children are getting confused. They need to be allowed to be children rather than having to constantly think about equalities and rights.”

The themes being discussed are complex for adults, too, because it matters of sexuality and gender it isn’t at all clear where nature end and nurture begins. And that is the essence of the grievance these Muslim parents have: they feel their children are not simply being education in the sociological fact of homosexuality and transgender, but inculcated – or ‘indoctrinated’, as one parent put it – into the moral virtue of such expressions of identity. Now, you may believe that homosexuality is as innate as heterosexuality, and transgender is simply another increment on the spectrum of human diversity, but for others the causal debate is more nuanced, not least because there is conflicting evidence from eminent scientists and psychologists on both sides of the divide. While some favour the ‘nature’ explanation based on biology or genetics, others incline to the ‘nurture’ theory, based on the psychological reaction to upbringing and environment, which obviously includes education.

The Bible’s understanding of biology (and, indeed, that of the Qur’an) is a world apart from modern studies, and theologians are as divided as scientists. Some insist that cultural factors contribute in psycho-sexual development, embracing Freudian psychological theory, for example, which asserts that homosexual orientation is a consequence of the failure to identify with the same-sex parent; that a physical or emotional distance between the child and the same-sex parent results in a failure to be able to identify with one’s own sex. This results in a same-sex deficit, which the homosexual is unconsciously trying to repair by creating emotional and sexual relationships with people of the same sex. It is not so much a moral degeneracy but an emotional immaturity, and one therefore capable of being healed through therapy.

This is the view of the great majority of Muslims, and also of a great many Christians and Jews. The cause of homosexual orientation being somehow a combination of both nature and nurture – a psychogenetic fusion – would therefore be susceptible to educational inculcation. If the ethos of a school is toward ‘tolerance’ of homosexuality and transgender as ‘natural’, and that ethos is reified by teachers who impart notions of equal validity and moral parity, then what the Bible or Qur’an happen to say becomes irrelevant: British values trump God’s created order. If a child feels a bit gender-neutral or trans one day, why not explore androgyny further? Why not try living as the opposite sex for a while? It might be fun. It certainly makes you a bit more interesting and gets you noticed.

There is no easy solution to this: the government-parent-religion tensions will persist in state education until one party asserts its dominance – which appears to be imminent – at which point the other parties will respond or react. While reason demands the serious critical consideration of scientific studies, and certainly those which are concerned with the possibility that same-sex preference and transgender may be genetically programmed, not all innate tendencies in children are either good or desirable. But that is too nuanced a debate in this febrile atmosphere. It is to be noted that in the hundreds of parents who have withdrawn their children from LGBT lessons in this school, sporting their banners declaring ‘Education not Indoctrination’, ‘My Child My Right’ and ‘Say No to sexualisation of children’, they have not been condemned as homophobes or bigots by LGBT lobby groups. If these had been Christian parents, however, no doubt Amanda Spielman would have issued an instant press release, and Peter Tatchell would have been there in a flash.

ealgeone #homophobia #transphobia freerepublic.com

Up to 2003 we had laws that criminalized homosexual behavior. SCOTUS struck down the last laws against it. IIRC, one could be jailed for homosexuality. We used to ban homosexuals from the military and highly classified jobs.

At one time homosexuality was considered a mental illness. Now that all of those prohibitions have been removed we are daily bombarded with homosexuality and now transgenderism. Pedophilia is next.

Michelle Cretella #fundie #transphobia psychologytoday.com

response to article
Submitted by American College of Pediatricians on June 7, 2017 - 10:39am
The American College of Pediatricians is a professional organization confident in the science we present and in the traditional ethics we uphold. In the past, we have typically directed critics to the relevant content on our website. Mr. Jack Turban that is not only libelous, but also denies the fact that untold numbers of American children are being experimented upon, and many of them permanently sterilized, under the guise of treating a largely transient disorder known as Gender Dysphoria of Childhood. This warrants a more public response.

The American College of Pediatricians has held true to its founding principles summarized by its slogan, “Best for Children.” The College has also endured ad hominem attacks for making factual statements that threaten agendas which promote the wants of adults over the needs of children. Attacking the messenger is a tactic commonly used by those who cannot refute a truthful message. Labels, such as hate group, extremist, right wing, miniscule, Christian fundamentalist, and deceptively named, reveal desperate attempts to deflect attention away from facts that undermine a desired agenda.

The American College of Pediatricians is precisely what its name implies: a national nonsectarian organization of child and adolescent physicians and health professionals. We have never surveyed the religious identities of our membership, nor attempted to attract physicians of a given religion. In fact, members of our Board of Directors and various committees have identified themselves as Christian, Jewish, Muslim and Buddhist. We are physicians and healthcare professionals united by a commitment to traditional Hippocratic medicine; a medical tradition that respects life from conception to natural death and provides care to all patients, as delineated in our Statement of Inclusiveness. It is true that we are relatively smaller than other medical organizations; we have 500 members and counting. Ultimately, however, this is irrelevant to the veracity of our statements; sound science and ethics are not determined by majority vote.

Responsible journalism requires thorough investigation of the subject at hand. This appears lacking with Mr. Turban’s report on the ACPeds. He and others have expressed deep concern over our very legitimate name, yet they erroneously designate us as the “ACP,” which stands for the American College of Physicians. Our proper designation is ACPeds. Our web address, pretty much gives it away. Then again, most of our detractors have never bothered to give our website, position statements, let alone any of the hundreds of scientific references there, a careful read. Were they to do so, they would realize how easily their alternative facts would be refuted, particularly those regarding Gender Dysphoria in Children.

Yes, Mr. Turban, prior to the widespread promotion of transgender affirmation, 75 - 95 percent of prepubertal children with Gender Dysphoria eventually outgrew that distress. The vast majority came to accept their biological sex by late adolescence after passing naturally through puberty. The alternative fact, recently put forth by activists, that large numbers of children who desisted were actually “misdiagnosed” with Gender Dysphoria is debunked by data in Dr. Devita Singh’s doctoral thesis, and also by Dr. T.D. Steensma et. al., as noted in slides 23-25 of our Gender Dysphoria power point.

Yes, Mr. Turban, children diagnosed with Gender Dysphoria pre-pubertally are permanently sterilized when the World Professional Association for Transgender Health and Pediatric Endocrine Society Guidelines are followed. According to these Guidelines, children are placed on puberty blockers as early as Tanner stage II of puberty (as young as age 11) and then placed directly on cross-sex hormones by age 16. An article by Dr. A. Evan Eyler, referenced in our full position statement, confirms that children administered blockers beginning at Tanner stage II and seamlessly transitioned to cross-sex hormones are prevented from producing gonadal tissue (eggs or sperm) for cryopreservation. They will be unable to have genetic offspring of their own even with artificial reproductive technology.

There is an obvious self-fulfilling effect in helping children to impersonate the opposite sex both socially and pharmacologically. Logic leads one to predict that most, if not all, pre-pubertal gender dysphoric children treated in this way will lose the potential to identify with their biological sex, and instead go on to claim a transgender identity. As noted in our position statement, the single follow-up study of such children finds just that; 100% of the pre-pubertal children placed on the social affirmation/puberty blocker protocol failed to desist.

According to the APA Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology (2014), among those youth who did resolve their Gender Dysphoria prior to the present-day transgender affirmation ethos, 63 - 100% of boys would identify as gay adults, and 32-50% of the girls would identify as lesbian by young adulthood. Affirming pre-pubertal gender dysphoric children as transgender potentially translates into a significant percentage of LGB adults being sterilized. Consequently, some members of the LGB community stand with the ACPeds against this “transgendering of children” which they view as nothing less than the single greatest form of homophobic hatred, namely, eugenics.
Contrary to popular belief, there is no evidence that the elevated rates of mental illness and suicide among transgender-identified youth and adults are due solely, or even predominately, to societal prejudice or discrimination. At least one 2008 study by LGBT-affirming researchers, noted in our Gender Dysphoria position statement, found these factors not to be causative. Mr. Turban’s article also alleges that the College has ignored evidence that transition improves mental health in gender dysphoric children. The “evidence” consists of two small short term studies that contain methodological flaws, and therefore, prove no such thing. There is also no scientifically rigorous, large, prospective or sufficiently longitudinal evidence that transition of gender dysphoric children prevents suicide in the long term. However, there is long-term research on the mental health of adults who transitioned with Gender Dysphoria. This reveals that despite initial relief of the dysphoria, one or more decades after transition, they often present with worse mental health than that of the general population, including a suicide rate nearly twenty times greater. This observation raises more questions than it answers, and should, therefore, give pediatric health professionals great pause- at least those who value evidence-based medicine and are dedicated to ‘first do no harm’.

Some members of the transgender community recognize this and have expressed solidarity with the ACPeds. Rene Jax, a Male to Female Trans author, wrote:

"Dear Dr. Cretella,
Chemical castration, sterilization and surgical mutilation are more than just words to me. They are personal and brutal realities; no child should be subjected to this. Thank you."

The ACPeds has also been contacted by clinicians and academic physicians across the political spectrum, including LGB affirming clinicians. They have expressed their gratitude to the ACPeds for saying publicly what they cannot. Division chairs in psychology and sociology, and many pediatric endocrinologists have told us that to stand for science and go against transgender group think is professional suicide and often results in relentless harassment including death threats.

Belief is in the mind; not in the body. Everyone knows that thinking or feeling that something is true does not make it true. When people consistently and persistently insist something that is contrary to physical reality, they are, at best, confused, or at worst, delusional. According to the alternative logic of transgender experts, however, this is true in every instance except where biological sex is concerned. In this case alone, the persistent and consistent insistence of something contrary to physical reality is definitive proof of the metaphysical claim that an immaterial essence, or in the words of Dr. John Money, “[an] internal sexed identity” is trapped in the wrong body. This foundational claim of transgender medicine has far more in common with a quasi-religion than it has with evidence-based science. How much longer will society sacrifice the health of its children upon these altars?

Michelle Cretella, MD, FCP President

Peter LaBarbera #fundie #homophobia #transphobia #wingnut lifesitenews.com

Liberal law center demonizes Christian foes of LGBTQ agenda as ‘hate groups’

August 18, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — In the vast array of leftist lies, one of the most dangerous is that groups and people defending historic Judeo-Christian sexual morality are somehow guilty of "hate." The main perpetrator of that “big lie” these days is the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which has turned smearing and demonizing social conservatives fighting the homosexual-transgender agenda into a very profitable business.

The SPLC is attempting to pull off one of the nastiest and most audacious “bait-and-switch” propaganda coups in history — equating the Christian-conservative led effort to defend biblical morality against the aggressive LGBTQ lobby with vile racists, Neo-Nazis and anti-Semitic extremist groups.

The Birmingham, Alabama-based SPLC’s “hate” campaign is helped along by lazy, biased journalists and online “social justice warriors” who delight in using its past anti-racism credentials to advance the Left's immoral and deviant sex-gender agenda.

CNN lends legitimacy to SPLC

Yesterday, CNN shamefully assisted the SPLC’s bogus “hate” narrative by running a story featuring its “hate map” under the initial headline, “Here are all the active hate groups where you live.” It was accompanied by a graphic of the SPLC’s “hate map” of alleged “hate groups,” which includes, under Illinois, my organization, Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH). We have been slandered as an SPLC “hate group” for the last several years.

On the SPLC ‘s Illinois map, AFTAH and other Christian pro-family groups are listed alongside a KKK group, a "white nationalist" outfit, and some affiliates of the Aryan Nations Sadistic Souls MC, another Nazi group. This is the SPLC’s vicious handiwork, treated as “fact” by the media.

After protests by those miscast as “haters,” CNN changed its headline to "The Southern Poverty Law Center’s list of hate groups.”

Similar stories featuring the SPLC’s bogus “hate map” have popped up across the country, including one in the The Boston Globe headlined, “Where hate calls ‘home’ in Massachusetts.”

The following pro-family groups join Americans For Truth in having the distinct “honor” of being lied about by the cunningly deceptive, sleazy and, yes, downright evil SPLC:

Abiding Truth Ministries (Scott Lively)

Alliance Defending Freedom (the SPLC recently attacked Attorney General Jeff Sessions for addressing this group)

American College of Pediatricians (Dr. Michelle Cretella)

American Family Association (Tim Wildmon)

American Vision

Center for Family and Human Rights (C-FAM; Austin Ruse)

Citizens for Community Values

Conservative Republicans of Texas (Dr. Steve Hotze)

Family Research Council (Tony Perkins)

Family Research Institute (Dr. Paul Cameron)

Heterosexuals Organized for a Moral Environment (H.O.M.E.)

Illinois Family Institute

Liberty Counsel (Mat Staver)

Mass Resistance (and its chapters in various states; Brian Camenker)

Mission: America (Linda Harvey)

Pacific Justice Institute (Brad Dacus)

Pass the Salt Ministries (Coach Dave Daubenmire)

Pray in Jesus Name Project (“Chaps” Klingenschmitt)

Public Advocate of the United States (Eugene Delgaudio)

Ruth Institute (Jennifer Roback Morse)

Save California (Randy Thomasson)

Traditional Values Coalition (Andrea Sheldon)

World Congress of Families/Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society (Allan Carlson)
As you can see, this is quite a large group, representing many millions of Americans and including some of the most accomplished and effective pro-family leaders in the United States. Who knew that these great Americans were the moral equivalents of neo-Nazi Stormtroopers and the Ku Klux Klan?

Hating truth

They are not, of course. Not even close. Could it be that leftists who deliberately conflate mere opposition to the LGBTQ agenda — a revolutionary sin movement that has destroyed the sanctity of marriage in the law and is leading the assault on citizens’ right to live according to the dictates of their faith with hatred— are the ones truly guilty of hate-mongering?

Common sense and logic tell us that those who resist a deviant-sex movement that has produced such profound evils as “pregnant men”; perversion-positive “Christianity”; and teaching little children that they can “become” the opposite sex though medical manipulations of their young bodies, are motivated not by malice or bigotry but rather a heartfelt desire to ward off the social destruction that comes from celebrating unnatural behaviors.

There is a popular saying in Christian, pro-family circles today: “Those who hate the truth call truth hate.”

I believe that at some level that is true, because when “journalists” cavalierly repeat politically calculated tripe like the SPLC’s “hate” smear as if it is authoritative and meaningful, they demonstrate contempt for sincere people of faith simply trying to follow God.

Besides, one of the “old school” rules of “fair” journalism is that in covering a cultural debate, you do not rely on one group’s biased characterization of its opponents, to preserve the ideal of a disinterested, neutral news story. Of course, those days are long gone as most media have shorn any pretense of objectivity and are increasingly fanatical cheerleaders for Big Gay and Big Trans. (What’s next, Big Poly?)

Go with the Big Lie

And so we behold a Fourth Estate very much interested and dutiful in advancing the “narrative” of one side of the “culture war” over homosexuality and “transgenderism,” using the noble-sounding cover of “civil rights.” Most media don’t even bother anymore to get viewpoints of the “other side” on this issue, or if they do, it’s often just a token quote to help reporters feel like they’re being fair.

This makes the SPLC’s goal of advancing its bold, pro-LGBT “hate” lie much easier than it should be.

It turns out that the “Big Lie” tactic attributed to Hitler was something he accused “the Jews” of doing in his 1925 autobiography, Mein Kampf, years before he led a demonization- and then genocidal government campaign against them. But history records that the mustached Nazi dictator and his henchmen (most notably Nazi propaganda minister Josef Goebbels) became masters of the tactic, ultimately using it as part of their horrifyingly evil program against Jews, Poles, and other “undesirables.”

Hitler wrote: “For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.”

Today’s leftist liars understand this harsh reality and know that their “end justifies the means” approach toward delegitimizing pro-family conservatives as “hateful” bigots yields big political and cultural dividends — and scares the media away from featuring conservatives in their stories.

So rather than oppose pro-family groups civilly on public-policy issues concerning homosexuality and gender confusion (transgenderism), the Left resorts to a sophisticated version of name-calling. It began in the post-Stonewall ‘70s, as radical “gay” activists held up signs equating prominent religious opponents of organized homosexuality, like Anita Bryant, with Hitler.

From there it went to tarring their foes as “homophobes,” a term invented by pro-“gay” psychologist George Weinberg, who neatly flipped the pathology from homosexual behavior itself to opposing homosexuality.

Ultimately, the SPLC “codified” that Big Lie, as it were, with its “hate-labeling” strategy that preposterously mixes Christian, pro-family groups opposed to the LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer) Lobby with vile neo-Nazis and white race-warriors.

The SPLC claims it is not demonizing moral and religious opposition to homosexuality but only the methods that the above conservative groups use to oppose the LGBTQ movement, but this is an absurd technicality. In another column, I will expose the arbitrariness of the SPLC’s “criteria” for determining which groups belong on its “anti-LGBT” “hate map.”

‘I’m not a hater?’

And yet, despicable as the SPLC’s hate-smear campaign is, it is highly effective. Making the spurious charge against morality-defenders as “haters” is far easier to do in our post-Christian, morally dumbed-down culture than defending oneself against the loaded accusation.

Indeed, forcing conservatives and Christians to plead defensively, “I’m not — ” is part of the SPLC’s propaganda strategy. We have become a society of simplistic slogans, like “Love is love” and “marriage equality.” In such a culture, accusing good-hearted Christians and conservatives of “hating gays” merely because they oppose (very unhealthy) homosexual behavior, “gay marriage” and creating sin-based “rights” is par for the course.

Denying that you are a “hater” when the most powerful forces in society — media, corporations, academia — are matter-of-factly echoing the SPLC smear — is sort of like denying that you beat your wife. You would never beat your wife — you are called to love her sacrificially as Christ loved the Church — but suddenly you are accused of having abused her, by an organization lionized by the press. A cunning, well-funded organization masquerading as a “civil rights” champion whose allegations are repeated far and wide with an air of moral authority and respectability.

Your pleas about the falseness of the outrageous smear are shared by friends (some similarly accused of beating their wives) but together you are drowned out by a chorus of enemies who have won the sympathy of the corrupt media.

Your only hope for justice is that a large and growing army of people — aided by some counter-cultural media leaders — comes to your aid and exposes the hateful slanders and the wicked organization behind them, so that nobody will ever believe its lies again.

This is how we must counter the SPLC’s calculated, cynical “Big Lie” against people of faith who humbly set out to speak truth, in the love of Christ, about one of the most difficult issues of our age.

Next: The shoddy research, irrationality and arbitrariness of the SPLC’s LGBT “hate group” lie.

David J. Stewart #fundie #transphobia #homophobia jesusisprecious.org

We are losing the battle folks! We are losing the battle against transgendered rights for homosexuals in America, because we aren't expressing our disgust as Christians against it. We should all be horrified! We should all be expressing our strong opposition against this creepy agenda, against the ungodly insane laws that permit transgendered men to use women's restrooms at will. Facebook has published 71 new gender options. Depending on who you talk to, you can find anywhere from a dozen up to over 100 new gender designations. But folks, the honest to God plain truth is that God Himself created us MALE and FEMALE, and there are only TWO genders.

What saith the Scripture? Genesis 1:27, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Genesis 5:2, “Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.”

Even all the animals were created by God as either: MALE or FEMALE. Please don't let the Devil confuse you, by trying to deceive you into believing that there are more genders than simply male or female. God NEVER intended for males to have carnal knowledge with other males. It is confusion! That is why God made females, for males to mate with, to procreate. Homosexual sex is sinful in God's sight, which brings contempt from God and Heaven, also showing disrespect for one's self, family and community. Homosexuals bring woeful shame upon one's own community!!! No community can thrive and be advertised as a great place to raise a family, when you have homosexuals sodomizing each other. Do you fully understand what goes on in the vile bedroom of a homosexual? I don't even want to describe it! It is sickening to an decent person! God pity the ungodly U.S. government, who has placed innocent little children as adoptees into hundreds-of-thousands of ungodly homosexual homes to raise them! What will become of those impressionable children? We have abused our God-given freedoms, demanding a right to sin, which WILL ultimately lead to our enslavement.

Lady Checkmate #fundie #homophobia #transphobia disqus.com

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Jesus Christ did Address Homosexuality and Transgenderism in the Holy Bible - Pastor Voddie Baucham"

Jesus Christ did Address Homosexuality and Transgenderism in the Holy Bible.

Pastor Voddie Baucham explains why the claim that Jesus Christ never addressed homosexuality is FALSE. He exposes the lies and myth of the "gay Christian".

https://youtu.be/loSWMYTd9B8

We share the gospel because it (He) is the Truth that sets free from sin. We love you and we want God's will for your life to be accomplished. Please seek Jesus Christ if you are struggling with sexual sin or any sin. There are brothers and sisters in Christ here who will pray with and for you. We seek God's will, not our own.

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified and the captives may be set free in Jesus name. Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

nooropia #sexist #transphobia reddit.com

1. Biological women will become second class citizens all over again. While TiMs can get their greedy hands on either self sustainability through robbing women's college grants and STEM education, or by marrying off to rich men who are attracted to male-to-pornofied-women, biological women will no longer have anymore ways or means to become financially/economically independent. We'd have to marry men again in order to survive, just like in the olden days. And since extreme right MRA fucks are fapping over creating their own virtual girlfriend and sex bots, they will hold it over our heads for the rest of our lives. "If you don't do exactly as I say, Brenda, I'm leaving you for my bot. At least she does what I say without contradicting me. AND she stays 18 years old forever.. can you say the same?" Which will lead to a regressive era of heightened domestic violence rates, date rapes, and general violence against women, and they'll hold the other sex options against us. They kinda used to do this with prostitutes back then. Now, you have to compete against TiMs, virtual porn, and sex robots.

2. Going further about TiMs taking over women colleges and grants/scholarships, this also means that other non-STEM jobs that used to be flooded with women (ie. Education, nursing, store managers, etc) will also be taken over. Porn and lingerie companies will push 'ugly natal' women out for the pornofied TiMs and robots. Which is not so bad, but that only means that now after all other moderately well paid career paths are taken, that means the only vector we'll have left is the service one. Remember the 1920's? While rich women had husbands to care for them, poorer women had to work as maids, nannies, personal cooks, and housekeeping jobs in order to survive. After all, transwomen only want the glamour of being women, and not the actual reality of being a woman: Having to clean up after others, changing diapers, actually taking care of children, etc.

3. Gay men and lesbian women will no longer have safe dating or sex spaces anymore. We'd have to go underground like we used to do. That or buckle under compulsory heterosexuality and marry the opposite sex.. and yes, trans counts as the opposite sex because otherwise you'll be a transphobic bigot. Hearts, not parts! What this may also mean is that, while gay marriage will still be allowed, a new law may be passed in order to protect the vulnerable, suicidal trans community: Same sex attraction will not be protected by law anymore, it will be changed to same gender attraction. So what this means is that a lesbian can marry a woman, but the other woman HAS to be transgendered since actual homosexuality is now seen as bigotry, a sickness, something to be put away to spare feelings. Marriages between two natal men or women will have their marriage licenses revoked. "It's better that way than to hurt the feelings of the trans community." they'll tell us.

4. Speaking of homosexuality, I echo the conversion camp thing, only it won't be done in churches. (It will still be done privately in churches, mind you.) It'll be done by the government to dismantle the cotton ceiling and for gay men to overcome their vagina repulsion/disinterest, and lesbians to overcome their penis repulsion/disinterest. Hearts, not parts! With advanced science, we'll be able to tell which embryos will grow up to become a homosexual adult. Can't have that with vulnerable trans people out there who wants to be loved for who they are and what's not in their pants. Abort all gay babies. Keep the straights, because even though many might not be interested in TiMs and TiFs, they're the ones with the real social power, so the TRAs will keep them around.

5. More and more children and adolescents will commit suicide due to their mutilated and hormonized bodies triggering their psyches. They can't adhere to strict gender roles? Time to kill ourselves.

6. Don't worry ladies; even though the more popular mainstream pornographic vectors will be swarmed with TiMs and robots, we'll still be sexually enslaved due to our depleted options. We'll become the "bottom of the barrel" options for men, who are used to the so called perfect bodies of robots and male-to-pornos. If you think sex trafficking stories are bad now, honey, you got a big storm comin'.

Lady Checkmate #fundie #enbyphobia #transphobia disqus.com

Lady Checkmate's headline: "First American Legally Recognized as 'Non-Binary' Reclaims Birth Sex, Disavows Trans Ideology as 'Fraud'"

First American Legally Recognized as 'Non-Binary' Reclaims Birth Sex, Disavows Trans Ideology as 'Fraud'

'Harmful Gender Ideologies Are Ruining Lives, Causing Deaths, and Contributing to the Sterilization and Mutilation of Gender-Confused Children'

(Link goes here: https://www.christiandailyreporter.com/)

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified. Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Mick Williams:
We'll never see this on ABC, NBC, et al. You can bet your life savings.

Lady Checkmate:
Nah. This story doesn't fit their agenda.

Freesu-San #fundie #homophobia #transphobia deviantart.com

Okay, I've said it before, and I'll say it again (this time I'll just elaborate): its only God that defines marriage; not you, not humans, not the government, not some activists, just God alone.

And before you say stuff like "Then polygamy is okay", or "But love is love!", or whatever excuse you're about to come up with, let me just get some stuff straight here, especially on some certain issues:


Polygamy
Okay, some of you may think that there are people in the Bible that practice polygamy (well, there were). But the big question is this: is polygamy acceptable? The answer is no.

Can a man love more than one wife? Certainly not.

A man cannot love more than one wife, neither should a woman love more than one husband. (1 Corinthians 7:1-2). The Scriptures tells us that "each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband." This sinful practice can be classified as a combination of fornication and adultery.

In countries such as Brazil and Netherlands that have legalized it, it has created a whole deal of chaos in those families, and the rest of the people.

Polygamous marriages, (or known to some countries as "group marriages"), can put a whole household into so much unrest and ruins, and it will have a negative impact on children living in polygamous families.

Having said that, polygamy is also classified as greed, because they will even take other men's wives, which before God is wrong. God created marriage between 1 man and 1 woman, Adam and Eve, not one man and multiple wives, not even Adam and multiple Eves.

Now I mentioned it, during Issac's time, people were seeing polygamy as a norm (which before God its not). But Issac married only one wife, and that's Rebekah. He loved her dearly, and he was loyal to her that he did not take another wife for any reason whatsoever.

Joseph, the 11th son of Jacob did not take many wives himself; he only married one woman, and had two sons with her.

Some of you reading this may think that the Bible condones polygamy. Wrong. And in case you didn't know, it's actually Islam that allows that practice, not Christianity. And with that being said, God's Word never for once approves it. The Bible also says "Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold." (Deuteronomy 17:17). Even the New Testament makes it clear that men are ought to have one wife, for example, when speaking about the role of the elders it says "A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach" (1 Timothy 3:2).
Bear in mind that phrase "the husband of one wife"; not two, not three, not four, not even 100, but one wife. That just tells you that polygamy is clearly unacceptable.

To all Christians reading this, and to all who are looking forward to be married someday, stick to one husband/wife.

Arranged marriage

Regardless of what you think, human beings are not Matchmakers. Okay? Unfortunately this thing is happening across the globe, more especially among rich people and Muslims. Some will even sell their daughters as child brides, which is totally wrong. Some will even kidnap young girls to forcefully marry them. That is why you even see human trafficking here, where they sell girls as child brides, forcing them to marry at such a young age. Its repulsive. Its wrong. Its downright immoral.

I mean, seriously, why can't they understand that God is the real Matchmaker? They just end up taking it into their own hands, and that never ends well. At all.

I mean, during Issac time, he wanted to marry but none of the ladies living there are even eligible because they all worship pagan gods. So God used Abraham's servant Eliezar, to bring the right wife for Issac.

God has His own way of bringing the right husband/wife for you, if you simply leave the matter to God's hands!

Same-sex "marriage"

A very widely debated topic, still going on today. And believe it or not, same-sex "marriage" is and will always be a sin. In fact, when it comes to homosexuality itself, the Bible does clearly forbids it. In countries such as Spain and Argentina that have allowed this practice, it has created a great deal of damage, to the point it even destroyed many families, and it is a very grave injustice to equality. Even in Netherlands, there has been a significant fall in the marriage rate since the day marriage was redefined. In France, there have been continuous large scale protests against this practice, even after the law was passed. In this century we live in, homosexuality is considered normal by many people. Whenever it is mentioned, it is not uncommon to hear someone ask "What's wrong with two people of the same gender falling in love? Isn't it normal?" The answers to these questions can be found in none other than the Bible.

In the modernized world we live in, people (especially Christians) are labelled as "homophobes" for not agreeing with homosexuality or anything related to it such as same-sex 'marriage', which is just foolish mentality.

The world considers what God clearly tells is unnatural to be natural (Romans 1:26-27). Some may argue that God's law forbidding homosexuality was only for the Old Covenant which God made between Himself and the Israelites. However, a quick search of the Scriptures will show that the New Testament has more verses condemning homosexuality than the Old Testament does.

Jesus himself gave God's definition of marriage in Mark 10:6-9, when he was speaking about marriage and grounds of divorce. He said that in the beginning 'God made them male and female.' He also said that "a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh'; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate."

Plus, God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. Geez man.

Recent polls also show that children are better off with a married mother and father than same-sex couples.

The worst part about that is that some of todays churches are even accepting it as a norm. No. Its shouldn't be that way. Its not good, its not Biblical, its not Godly, its not right.

Please read the journal for more information: fcu777.deviantart.com/journal/—

Transgender "marriage"

Possibly one of the rarely debated issues, transgender 'marriage' is as worse as same-sex 'marriage'. It will affect everybody in a really drastic way. When men liberalizes sin, and when sin demands rights and acceptance, that very nation will crumble down, and will eventually lead people to Hell. This practice is not genetically based, and it is not simply a psychological disorder that "have to live with"; it is rebellion against God's plan.

God created marriage solely between one man and one woman, but in today's world, they disregard the Truth and not only promote same-sex 'marriage', but also promote laws that involves a transgender person who was born a male to marry a man, and a transgender person born a female to marry a woman.

The most basic to our understanding of sex is that God created two (and only two) genders: male and female, as He created Adam as a man, and Eve as a woman. (Genesis 1:27). There is no room for error in God's creation, and no one is born with the "wrong body." as the transsexual activists so claim.

They may think they are right all the time, but God will weigh their hearts (Proverbs 21:2). And the Scriptures clearly warned of such pride:

"For the wicked boasts of the desires of his soul, and the one greedy for gain curses and renounces the Lord. In the pride of his face the wicked does not seek him; all his thoughts are, "There is no God." ~ Psalms 10:3-4

"For the sin of their mouths, the words of their lips, let them be trapped in their pride. For the cursing and lies that they utter" ~ Psalms 59:12

"For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life—is not from the Father but is from the world." ~ 1 John 2:16

And also the Bible says that He resists the proud and give grace to the humble (Proverbs 3:34). Some people (even the LGBT activists, and so-called Christians) may argue "But what's wrong with pride?!", when pride, unfortunately is what Satan uses to lead more people to Hell. It is no wonder that many are too comfortable in sin that they are very hardened against The Word of God.

A man should stay as a man, and a woman should stay as a woman, is that too hard to ask?

See this for more information: fcu777.deviantart.com/journal/—

....

What marriage is
When you hear the word marriage, its earliest use of that very English word dates back to the 13th century. However, it's more valuable than we can ever think. Having said so, there is more to marriage than just "love and romance". Unfortunately, many seem to deny that.

Who created marriage in the first place? God did. In the book of Genesis, highlights God's plan for marriage as it says:

"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them. And God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth." ~ Genesis 1:27-28
First of all, marriage, is not something that just happened recently in the century we live in. In fact the first marriage took place right in the beginning, when Adam and Eve are joined together as husband and wife (Genesis 3:21-24).

After he created Adam and all the animals, God said “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.” . So He put Adam to sleep, “and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.” (Genesis 2:21,22)

When a man and a woman get married they commit themselves to spending their lives in a new relationship. It is a partnership of love, made richer and deeper through sex. Like many people, Christians regard it as the best context for nurturing children. It is also seen as the best (many Christians would say the only) setting for sex.

In any marriage ceremony the bride and groom must confirm that they want to marry each other, and after the opportunity has been given publicly for anyone present to prevent the marriage if there is a legal reason, the couple join hands and make promises. They exchange rings, which are worn as a reminder of these promises for the duration of their married life.

Marriage is more than a man a woman joined together, it is a beautiful gift from God, a marital devotion solely between one man and one woman as God created it to be. And to add to it, marriage is meant to be for life, and not some cheap contract for people to use and dump. Jesus gave a solid warning concerning divorce, when He said, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her. And if a woman divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery." (Mark 10:11-12). Simple as that. Having said this, in marriage there should be room for reconciliation, else how can that marriage even stand?

"And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband: But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife." ~ 1 Corinthians 7:10-11

There are aspects that can either build or crumble down a marriage: fcu777.deviantart.com/journal/—

A spiritual aspect on marriage

Now, there is more to marriage than the earthly one itself. Having said this, if you look at the issue in a spiritual aspect, it actually reflects our relationship between us the Church, the children of God for that matter and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ who is the head of the Church, the body of Christ to be precise. The earthly marriage has this high symbolism that most of us unfortunately are not even aware of or chose to overlook .

If you look at Isaiah 54:5 where it says "For thy Maker is thine husband; the Lord of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called." And also the Bible says that the husband is the head of the wife "even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior." And that as wives submit to their husbands, so do we as Christians submit ourselves to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and His will (Ephesians 5:23,24,32).

This is something we as Christians really need to keep in mind.

....

In Conclusion

Marriage is a very beautiful union that God has created. In fact, the government did NOT create marriage, God did. Marriage is more than just about love and romance between two people, it is a holy marital devotion between a man and a woman, the way God designed it. And before you ask, in as much as marriage is important, and it is a beautiful union defined by God as between one man and one woman, we are actually given a choice whether to marry or not. I mean 1 Corinthians 7:8-9 says "I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I. But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn." That just shows you that marriage is not by force. All in all, marriage is and always will be between one man and one woman.

Intelligitimate #racist #transphobia voat.co

Mention trannies have autogynephilia, get banned by Zionist faggot moderators at /r/communism.

I was finally banned from /r/communism again, this time because a mod on /r/communism was reading /r/EnoughCommieSpam and liberal faggot Zionists were complaining that my comments didn't treat trannies who masturbate to themselves in the mirror as real women

...

If the Zionist faggot moderators at /r/communism had to choose between trannies and Mugabe, they'd nuke Zimbabwe to uphold the identity of men who masturbate to images of themselves in the mirror dressed as women.

Amos Moses #transphobia #homophobia disqus.com

(commenting on story "Man Who Identifies as Woman Wins World Championship in Women's Cycling, 'It's Not Fair' Says Female Competitor"):

Amos Moses:
it still mystifies me .... how women .... who fought so hard to be able to have their own events and standing ..... are now allowing MEN to claim to be women ..... and are being allowed to destroy what they built ..... many "feminists" who again argue they are being "oppressed" by the patriarchy ..... are allowing the faux-women to destroy what they say they are opposed to ..... and it is all in the name of "tolerance" ......

what it really boils down to is this ..... this is a hatred of women ..... it is a hatred of masculinity .... it is a rejection of all truth ..... it is a rejection of science and biology .....it is a rejection of any rational thought ..... and all that was abandoned by the proponents of homomirage ..... and everyday we are seeing just how far that MIRAGE is affecting society in general ..... if you reject the foundations on which rests all that we have .... where is there for you to stand ..........

homomirage is the gaping wound in society ..... all the rest are the pus and gangrene that the infection of that wound is spilling out of .........

Burt Toast:
No, once again you are bringing same-sex marriage into a story where that is not even mentioned. It's unrelated, there is no causal effect, and you're being very dishonest.

Luis Javier Ruiz & Christopher Doyle #fundie #homophobia #transphobia nbcnews.com

A survivor of the June 2016 mass shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, that left 49 people dead now says he has found Christ and is no longer gay.

“I should have been number 50!,” Luis Javier Ruiz said in a message posted to Facebook. “Going through old pictures of the night of Pulse, I remember my struggles of perversion, heavy drinking to drown out everything and having promiscuous sex that led to HIV. My struggles were real! The enemy had its grip, and now God has taken me from that moment and has given me Christ.”

Ruiz shared this revelation just ahead of the Freedom March, to be held May 5 in Washington. The event bills itself as a “celebration of freedom from homosexuality and transgenderism. The event's organizers have partnered with Voice of the Voiceless, a religious group whose mission is “to defend the rights of former homosexuals, individuals with unwanted same-sex attraction, and their families,” according to its website.

Christopher Doyle, founder of Voice of the Voiceless, told NBC News this weekend's event is "about celebrating our lives and not hating the LGBTQ movement."

"We made a conscious choice to leave homosexuality, and we should be able to do that without being mocked," Doyle wrote in an email.

Ruiz, who was featured in a social media post for the Freedom March above the words “Homosexuals Can Change!,” is expected to attend Saturday's event along with others “celebrating freedom from homosexual/transgender lifestyles,” according to the Freedom March’s Facebook page.

Ruiz did not respond to NBC News' request for comment.

Amos Moses #transphobia disqus.com

Amos Moses:
"Trans teen stabs parents to death because they would not affirm his 'transition'
"State of WI ordered to cover surgeries for trans UW employees"
and the social contagion of homoMIRAGE marches on .............

San Geronimo:
Wrong. Gay marriage is unrelated to trans issues.

Amos Moses:
directly related ... goes to "tolerance" of the delusional of who and what they are and depravity of mind .... cannot accept those who refuse to put up with their lies ........

San Geronimo:
Gay marriage being allowed has no bearing whatsoever in the trans community, just as it has no bearing on the American Auto Workers’ Union.

Amos Moses:
depravity is a social contagion .... just as if it were typhoid .....

San Geronimo:
We do not blame thieves for the work of arsonists.

Amos Moses:
but they both go to the same jail ... the penalty is the same ....... and the depravity of mind is the same ........

San Geronimo:
We do not blame carjackers for the work of tax frauds.

Amos Moses:
wow ... you just keep wandering further and further from reality ........

San Geronimo:
Amos, you are doing the EXACT SAME THNG when you blame same sex marriage on the fact that we try to help trans people. Why don’t you say why gay marriage is to blame for this completely separate, non-gay issue?

Amos Moses:
i have again and again ..... it is depravity ... it is narcissism ..... it is not marriage .... it is a lie ... it is delusion ..... they both think one of them is a woman as they commit acts as if one or the other is a woman .... women do not have penises ..... cutting it off does not alter DNA ..... and it applies homosexuals and trannies ......... and a three year old knows it .... it is not rocket surgery ......

San Geronimo:
I am not arguing with you about that. The fact that I'm NOT a bigot about these things goes without saying, I'm not commenting on your feelings about that. All I'm doing is asking you why you blame gay marriage on anything related to the trans community. They have zero in common. The fact you think both are examples of depravity doesn't mean they are the same thing.

Amos Moses:
depravity breeds depravity ...... so the samething ..... you are trying to say they are different ..... when it aint .... it is delusional and depravity if you are a sodomite or a tranny ......... or whatever ........

San Geronimo:
Your words say it all. I don’t use words like “sodomite” or “tranny” but whatever you want to call them, homosexuals are not the same as trans people. Homosexuality is about attraction. Trans issues are not.

Amos Moses:
so what .... they are what they are .... they have a MADE UP LIST of 85 MADE UP TERMS for their DEPRAVITY so they can "feel good" about them depravity ..... it aint about their FEELZ ....... it is ABOUT THE TRUTH ...... and you sop up that lie with a biskit and then spue the lie back out ..... making you a liar ....... as much or more than they ........

Some TERFs #transphobia reddit.com

Re: Cultures that have ‘third genders’ don’t prove transgenderism is either ubiquitous or progressive

(LittleOwl12)
There's a lot of "noble savage" romanticism in trans ideology. They don't respect these cultures enough to learn anything in depth about them. They just want what they want out of it,

(baremon7)
It looks more like a barbaric practice of mainly men that don't embrace a sexist toxic form of masculinity to set them apart from women, but see themselves as non-men. it is enforced in the hierarchy of a male system.

Women that don't feel like women can just be killed by their family.

(lefterfield)
That's been my conclusion from reading about the vast majority of third gender cultures. It's infuriating when libfems try to justify transgenderism with it, when it's clear they know nothing about the practices or the cultures.

(LumpyTrust)
And how many of these "third genders" treated the person as a member of the opposite sex? Unless they were treated identically to members of the opposite sex, it's not comparable to modern trans.

They say "Transwomen are women", not "transwomen are a third category/transwomen are a category of biological males".

(Elle_Ciel)
Having extra genders doesn't make any sense unless the culture already had a rigid gender role binary. Not to mention the implication that being gay or GNC makes you a less valid or valuable member of your sex so you get tossed into the "non-man" category. None of these cultures viewed GNC men the same as actual women, and certainly not the same as being biologically female. Were they even allowed to have relationships or marriages with other men? Just because this is better than how they'd be treated in most cultures influenced by Abrahamic religions, that doesn't mean all these tribes lived in progressive, queer-affirming, sex-positive intersectional feminist utopias. /eyeroll?

I'm no anthropologist so feel free to chime in with any evidence to the contrary, but it seems like a lot of "third genders" are just for males. What did they do with the lesbians or transmen?

(womenopausal)
Married off and repeatedly impregnated is my guess.

a fool in paradise #transphobia freerepublic.com

something I saw on the british national healthcare system told people undergoing hormonal treatment to change sex that they may experience a shift in desires to the same sex as their birth sex (opposite of the sex hormones they are taking), and “don’t be concerned by this change”.

So could a number of so-called same sex desire afflicted persons find normalcy if they simply took a boost of sex hormones for their birth sex?

At the end of it all, sex positive agenda proponents don’t care why you desire to have sex with someone (science, lust, societal, etc.) they simply seek to end all moral judgments regarding sexual pairings of any kind regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status (single or adultery), number, or species of partner(s).

Kate Millett wanted to encourage homosexual experimentation (as did the Weather Underground who felt that same sex swinging in their group smashed the patriarchy and smashed monogamy). If it is genetic, how could one be compelled to “experiment”? Why is it so wrong to encourage self identified homosexuals to experiment with heterosexual encounters? Why is advocacy only permitted to encourage homosexuality (California is outlawing so called ‘conversion therapy’).

Amos Moses #fundie #transphobia disqus.com

American4Truth:
If you "identity" as something that you are not, then you are mentally ill, Period!

swibily:
Doesn't it require a mental health professional to make a diagnosis like that?

Amos Moses:
nope........

swibily:
Really, because I think it does. Otherwise it's an opinion.

Amos Moses:
and that is just YOUR opinion ........ so NOPE ........

swibily:
No, it isn't my opinion that making a medical diagnosis requires someone with medical credentials, so NOPE right back at you.

Amos Moses:
BUT .... it is JUST YOUR OPINION that this is a MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS ...... and FYI ..... NO "medical credentials" are required ....... so NOPE .......... it is however a SPIRITUAL diagnosis ..... and YOU are not qualified to make it .......... YUP .........

swibily:
You are not qualified to give a spiritual nor a medical diagnosis. I'm not providing either, just saying that if someone makes such a pronouncement they better have medical proof to back it up.

Amos Moses:
"You are not qualified to give a spiritual nor a medical diagnosis."

and again ..... THAT IS JUST YOUR OPINION ......... so who cares .... YOU are not qualified to judge if it is SPIRITUALLY diagnosed correctly as you reject those things ....... and we do not REQUIRE YOUR PERMISSION to do so ..... so NOPE .......... whatta ya gonna do about it hot shot ......... you and your multiple SOCK ACCOUNTS ..... and all of your ~200 comments here ........... DIDDLY .........

swibily:
I'm not here to argue with you. The bottom line is you cannot call something a mental illness if you're not in an intellectual position to make such a diagnosis.

Amos Moses:
"The bottom line is you cannot call something a mental illness if you're not in an intellectual position to make such a diagnosis."
ROTFL AGAIN ......... ummm ... again .... YOU are not an AUTHORITY HERE ..... and it is JUST YOUR OPINION that it is a MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS ...... and despite your objections to it ..... YES ..... we certainly CAN ..... FYI ..... it is not a "medical diagnosis" here as this is not a medical setting ...... so BOO to you .... and as i said ..... whatta ya gonna do about it hot shot ......... you and your multiple SOCK ACCOUNTS ..... and all of your ~200 comments here ...... right ..... DIDDLY .........

swibily:
I’m not attempting to BE an authority. You are. You are the one calling everything a mental illness just because you want to call it that.

Amos Moses:
"I’m not attempting to BE an authority. You are." ..... ROTFL .... LIE ....
ummmm .... okay ..... NOPE ...... the one, the only and the FINAL AUTHORITY here is scripture ..... not MY OPINION ..... and NOT YOURS ............ when and IF you ever can prove anything you say or accuse others here arises to meet scripture ..... then maybe some of what you say may be proven true ...... but none of it has so far ..... as you reject God and scripture ........
"You are the one calling everything a mental illness just because you want to call it that."
more lies .........

swibily:
Why are you dragging in all this irrelevant mush? All I am saying is you aren’t a medical professional so you aren’t qualified to cite mental illness. Which is perfectly true. A religious person with an opinion is just that.

Amos Moses:
Okay where is YOUR evidence that i am not .... right .... you have none .... and .... YOU constantly try to assert yourself as authority here .... AS YOU JUST DID .... with your assertion about my education .... and you LIED as you did so .... so NOT "irrelevant mush" ..

swibily:
Where did you obtain your Ph.d. from?

Amos Moses:
so you understand that to ask that question is a DIRECT admission that you have no evidence and that you lied ..... so thnx for your admission of guilt ...... and that is also an admission you are again trying to assert YOUR authority as if you had any to demand it be proven one way or the other and that you have again admitted that you lied that YOU do not try to assert authority here ... again ..... thnx for your admission ......
and to answer your question ...... nunya ... as in none of your business .... and my question to you is ..... WHY do you think you get to ask a person to DOX themselves in a public forum ..... and if you think that is not a big deal ...... ANSWER YOUR OWN question and DOX yourself ............
FYI ..... you have yet to prove such documentation is a requirement for anything outside of a medical setting ...... and you have to prove that just because a person has an alphabet behind their name that they are competent to determine anything especially in the field of inquiry they profess to be "expert" ............ see ..... that is ALSO an authority issue ..... and YOU are again asserting that as authority .....

swibily:
It isn’t about me.
I’m not making scientific claims.
That would be YOU doing that.
Problem is, you have no qualifications.

Amos Moses:
you are not a man (or woman) under authority ...... and therefore you have no authority ....... "Problem is, you have no qualifications." ..... you are not a competent judge to make that assessment ......... AND THAT IS A CLAIM YOU MADE .......

swibily:
None of this is about me, it’s about you calling things mental illness because you disapprove of them and not because they are actually mental illness. Unless you’d care to tell me where you got your Ph.d. from.

Amos Moses:
again .... trying to get a person to DOX themselves ... so ... YOU FIRST .... but the fact is YOU HAVE NO AUTHORITY to make any demand .... nor is your demand even worth considering as you have not PROVEN YOUR CLAIM that a FUD (Ph.D) is a requirement here or that it is a requirement OUTSIDE a medical setting ..... SO FIRST ...... PROVE YOUR CLAIM .........

swibily:
I do not require authority to request authority. I would not get on an airplane if I didn't know the pilot was qualified to fly the plane. I don't need authority to make such a request.

Amos Moses:
"I do not require authority to request authority."
sure ... request DENIED ........ you have no authority here .......... i do not grant you any authority ever and there is no one here able to grant it to you ..... the AUTHORITY here is scripture ... learn to use it and be under it ..... or take a hike .....
FYI .... i do not know what kind of an airplane you are referring to .... but if you get on a passenger jet ... and ask to see the pilots credentials .... i think the pilot would ask to see your credentials first i.e. your FAA credentials (AUTHORITY) .... and if you had none he or she would tell you to get off his plane ........... they are the captain ....... so nice bluff .....

swibily:
I don't have authority. I don't need it, and I am not using it. Understand that yet?
A patient doesn't need authority to request it of his doctor.
A passenger doesn't need authority to request it of his pilot.
A student doesn't need authority to request it of his teacher.
You are being requested for authority because you are diagnosing things as "mental illness" but you are not a doctor.

Amos Moses:
"A patient doesn't need authority to request it of his doctor.
A passenger doesn't need authority to request it of his pilot.
A student doesn't need authority to request it of his teacher."
you can try and assert that authority ... they might grant it .... we have NO authority to grant YOU authority to judge scripture ..... DENIED ....
"You are being requested for authority because you are diagnosing things as "mental illness" but you are not a doctor."....
you have no authority to make that assessment ...... you would have to have GREATER OR EQUAL AUTHORITY to do so .... if you do not hold at least equal authority YOU are not a competent judge .....SO ....
where is YOUR authority .......

swibily:
No one's asserting authority by asking a question. You are having a hard time with that one, aren't you?

Amos Moses:
YUP .... you are asserting a desire to judge it .... you are not a competent judge ........

Morris Dancer #transphobia gendertrender.wordpress.com

That’s a little illusory, because the trans movement is itself a fundamentally conservative re-assertion of straight male dominance, in dress-up form.

The only way in which it diverges from traditional heterosexism is that these particular straight men are full-on sexual fetishists, who are publicly very exhibitionistic with their kinks.

I would be happy to align myself with the traditional Right against that aspect of transgenderism, while rejecting transgender politics as a particularly aggressive form of male, heterosexist intrusion into the lives of women, children, lesbians and homosexual men (I use the term “homosexual men” because being one myself, I think we need to rediscover that term – it emphasises that sexual orientation is about sex, not “gender”).

The best way to make sure that homosexual people aren’t carried along by the transgender train wreck is to disassociate ourselves from them as much as possible, and to make it clear to our “dear leaders” in all the “official” LGB bodies that we reject their support of transgender, genderqueer and all its associated misogynistic, anti-homosexual bullshit.

Bethany Blankley #homophobia #transphobia charismanews.com

By destroying the institution of marriage, the "gay rights" LBGQTI movement made possible the extension of similar "legal rights" for other "lifestyle choices," including zoophilia, consanguinamorous relationships, necrophilia, pedophilia, polygamy, and every other "fluid" sexual preference or identification—including sologamy and trans-polyamorous relationships.

Efforts to normalize sex with animals as an accepted lifestyle choice resulted in one documentary winning an award this year that idolizes a sexual relationship between a man and his bottlenose dolphin lover.

The 40-year movement to legalize sexual interaction with children is working. People are publicly advocating without shame: "I'm a pedophile, but not a monster;" and, "pedophilia is natural and normal for males."

Now, incest activists in the consanguinamorous community argue it's their turn to have their sexual preference and lifestyle choice validated socially and legally.

Because of a case in New Mexico that's making national headlines, incest activists argue exactly what homosexuals argued to normalize incest.

"I was born this way."

"I can't choose who I love."

"I have a right to be happy just like everyone else."

"We aren't hurting anyone."

"Who is the government to legislate love?"

Incest activists maintain that all sexual preferences and acts should be legal if they are consensual and don't harm anyone. More importantly, the government should not be legislating love.

Christina Shy, an incest activist who runs an advocacy and support website for consanguinamorous people, and is in a relationship with her half-brother, argues that incest "needs to be brought to the attention of everybody in the country and people need to start thinking differently. It was the same with gay people just a few years ago and now they can get married they are accepted. Well why not consanguinamorous people like us? We are all adults. We are not pedophiles, there's no domestic issue. We are in love, we want to be together, but we are related. That shouldn't be a deciding factor."

She's right—if sex is consensual among adults in the privacy of their own home—how is it wrong or even illegal?

How is consensual sex between two adult men different than consensual sex between adult brothers and sisters or adult mothers and sons? If two adult men can legally marry each other, why can't consensual adult incestuous couples?

Why should one consensual relationship be denied and another legal?

Incestuous adults aren't coercing anyone. They are knowingly making choices about their own bodies, so why does anyone have a problem with it? It's really none of anyone else's business.

If transgender people in America, who represent less than half of one percent of the population, can have the government dictate bathroom policies for non-transgender people in public schools and stores, why won't the government legalize consanguinamorous relationships?

Homosexuals, who represent less than 3 percent of the population in America, can legally marry and adopt children, why can't incestuous, polygamists, pedophiles and zoophiles?

If morality and laws are determined by personal preferences (that are fluid and always changing) to justify societal norms, why is a different standard being used to legislate incest, necrophilia or pedophilia than that of same-sex relationships?

Incestuous relationships are mutually consensual, therefore they should be legal. (The same reasoning can be applied to murder. Surely, if two people agree to murder someone, in fact a group of people consent to murder another group of people, their consent justifies their action, which should therefore legalize murder.)

The same goes for polygamy. And necrophilia.

Why is having sex with dead people wrong? The corpse doesn't care. It's dead. It doesn't hurt the corpse; it doesn't even know what's happening. Granted, it can't consent to the sexual act, but that doesn't matter because there are enough necrophiliacs to argue that their sexual preference is normal.

When it comes to not hurting anyone, incest activists argue that abortion is legal, so again, what standard is being used to legislate harm to another person?

They are right. If a baby has no constitutional rights, and adults do, why can't the adults, who aren't harming anyone else, be together?

Practicing homosexuality used to be illegal. Now gays can marry. Times have changed, so who has the audacity to suggest that incest is not the new normal of the 21st century family? Or bestiality?

"Non-human animals have incestuous relationships and multiple partners," some activists argue. Likewise, it's well-known that kings and queens had incestuous relationships for centuries to 'keep their bloodline pure.'

So, who is the government to legislate love? Everyone has the right to love whomever they choose. All love is equal. How is heterosexual love better than incestuous love or being in love with multiple partners?

As the defendant in the New Mexico case argues, as to why he should be allowed to love, have sex with and even marry his mother, he says: "This is about whether I have the right to love someone. And I sure (expletive) have the right to love Monica. You can't tell people who to love or who not to love."

His mother's name, Monica, could easily be "Matthew," the name of a brother, father, uncle or homosexual boyfriend.

No love is wrong.

Gay rights activists and corrupt politicians who chose to legalize same-sex marriage and transgender bathroom policies, have no justification to prevent the legalization other sexual behavior.

James A. Wilson #transphobia #homophobia #fundie fstdt.com

Men are simply born men! Women simply are born women! Ask any non-Darwinist geneticist and you tell me what the truth is! If Transgenderism is valid, why do transgendered "women" commit crimes at similar rates to men? Because they are MEN! Yet I'm the one with the third grade understanding of science.

Homosexuality is unnatural because children who are raised in homosexual households are more likely to be in poverty, incarcerated, depressed, and also more likely to become homosexuals. This is verified information

Taylor Swift's "reputation" album and corresponding music videos have shown off her drunkenness, vindictiveness, as well as her lack of modesty in attire. Quite sad, really.

Next, I am not a schizophrenic person, and you libs have obviously never heard of reusing content with permission. I simply reused the content from Pastor Grimes' sermons to bring the light of the Gospel of Christ to the unsaved heathens residing there until I was removed by hyper-PC liberals who decided that the word "tranny" was comparable to the n-word. When were trannies enslaved again in the United States? Please enlighten me. Trannies and tranny enablers are insulting the African American community by spewing nonsense like that.

natsumihanaki20 #fundie #homophobia #transphobia natsumihanaki20.deviantart.com

(Note:The link may not take you to page the qoute originated from)

It's true that love knows no gender but that is not true with romantic love. Also, reparative therapy is not harmful. SOME of them are harmful but, not all of them are like that. There are studies proving that reparative therapy can help homosexuals overcome their homosexuality over long intervals of time. Also, there is no biological component to homosexuality. There is no proof that homosexuality has anything to do with biological components. On the contrary, there's proof that homosexuality cannot be to biological components and it's most likely due to social factors. Childhood experiences have a profound effect on who we are, and most of data gathered so far has proven that there is a link between homosexuality and child sexual abuse (among other things). In addition, most humans are not bisexual. Men are designed to like women, and women are designed to like men. Thus, most humans are heterosexual. Romantic love should not be confused with love for they are different from each other. Romantic love involves sexual and physical attraction whilst love is simply a spiritual love. Romantic love is only present among lovers while love is among everything. The existence of love between people of the same gender does not make them bisexual for it'll be the same as saying that a mother who loves her child is a pedophile. Jonathan and David were not romantically attracted to each other nor soulmates; they were simply great friends who would play a great role in each other's destinies due to their great love for God. They loved each other in the same way a man loves his brother, a father loves his son, a man loves his pet, and a man loves his friend. Their souls were tied together because they were very similar to each other, and both shared a great love for God. They became like brothers not soulmates. All men are born straight but due to social experiences they change. Also, homosexuals are indeed condemned by Paul. The word Paul used does not mean temple prostitutes; Paul invented that word and is a conjunction between the words used to refer to homosexual men in the Old Testament. The word 'homosexual' is best translation so far of said words. There's no historical evidence that even suggests the word meant temple prostitute. That translation is solely based on speculation by pro-homosexual groups, angry at God for considering what they do and feel loathsome. Homosexuality is thoroughly condemned in the Bible, not just the behavior but the feelings as well. The Bible promotes people to love others but this love is not romantic love but simply brotherly love which is genderless but romantic love is another story. Gender alike age is biological and determined through ones' DNA, it's not something decided by one's mind. The man you mentioned felt uncomfortable in his body because he had male DNA, and thus felt attraction toward females as God intended for him to be. He felt in that way for that is how God intended him to be. However, this is not the case with a transgender individual. The transgender lifestyle is condemned by God, and it's solely due to mental illness (and confusion) than to being genuinely in the wrong body. Gender dysphoria is a mental disorder that can be cured, and should not be encouraged or accepted. I agree that we should not act hateful toward LGBT+ when we attempt to fix them but, in no way should we accept such a broken state of mind and body or celebrate such individuals. And also, we should not associate with them unless they have proven genuine interest in turning back from their wickedness for they usually will try to brainwash you to believe lies about God's commandments. Parents should not accept their child choosing to be LGBT+ (or just confused) for parents are not supposed to accept the errors of their kids and let them dwell in it but to completely disapprove of it and thoroughly help their kids walk the straight path to heaven rather than the crooked path to hell. I'm appalled at how far Satan has deceived people and how much he dwells in Christianity to the point were people have become alien to love."

Lady Checkmate #fundie #homophobia #transphobia disqus.com

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Parents plan 'Sex Ed Sit Out' to protest sexualized school curricula and sexualization of children"

(cut-and-pasted from Fox News, link here: http://www.foxnews.com/family/2018/04/12/parents-plan-sex-ed-sit-out-to-protest-sexualized-school-curricula.html)

Buddy:
Public schools have to teach real world issues. If you want to keep your children isolated from the world we live in, then put them in private school. As an educator however, I can say from experience that you are putting your children at a real disadvantage.

Lady Checkmate:
Education is meant to teach children reading, writing, arithmetic, etc., not promote an alt-left agenda that tells children they must decide at 3 if they are male or female and that grown men want to rape them, i.e., sexualizing children should NOT be a part of the curriculum nor should a foolish teacher/educator be allowed to manipulate the curriculum to include the sexualization of children nor promote their twisted "child rape" agenda. "Real world issues", taught in school, DO NOT and SHOULD NOT include sexualizing children. No matter how you word it, it's wrong. And if you're here to promote that (the sexualization of children/child rape), your stay will be brief. You can quote me on that.
Enjoy your day.

Buddy:
I'm a school teacher and I honestly wish that all we had to do is teach our kids the core subjects. Unfortunately, we are often faced with sexual issues because parents such as this woman will not teach their children anything about sex. I know because I had conservatives parents that never taught me about sex or homosexuality or anything like that. I learned by seeing dirty magazines and porn. No one should learn about sex in that way.

Lady Checkmate:
Buddy, you're trying to conflate two different issues. Sex (male and female within a marriage covenant) is natural and should be taught, at the right age. I'm sure mom is teaching her children about natural sex and the marriage covenant, husband and wife, as that's biblical. Anything outside of God's design is sin and abominations and NO, no decent parent (who loves their children) will teach their children to sin, i.e., rebel against God. Homosexuality is a sexual behavior choice and an abomination before God, so no, she is NOT teaching her children to sin. Stop your troll games, sir. They're boring, childish and simple.
Finally, you've been trolling our community for awhile, so let's wrap this up - get to the heart of your issue and why you're obsessed with us. It seems your parents taught you right, they didn't teach you to sin, BUT you chose to sin and rebelled against their sound teachings and God. How sad, for you. At least they tried. God will honor them for doing the right thing. You may be a prodigal, but you come across as reprobate. Seek Jesus Christ. If you're a prodigal, He hasn't turned His back on you, even if you turned your back on Him. Either way, you and I are done. I don't have time to be your substitute parent for you to project your issues on. My prayers are with your parents, any children you're exposed to and that if you're prodigal you return to God sooner than later. Again, stop the troll sock games and get right w/God OR move on. I'm not here to play with you.
P.S. Children are off limits here and trolling violates our community guidelines. Final warning.

Telepathic Intruder #homophobia #transphobia freerepublic.com

It’s no news to me. Not only transgenderism but homosexuality is being promoted and encouraged. It’s a self-delusional state which not only imposed on them, but everyone else who would otherwise say it’s just wrong. We’re conditioned into thinking it’s somehow brave and admirable to admit sexual deviations from the norm. What percentage of the animal kingdom is actually homosexual?

They will say there are examples in captivity, but that is hardly a natural environment. What percent of them actually prefer their own sex rather than the opposite? No examples I’m aware of. Yet in humans the percentages are increasing as the culture promotes it. It’s not at all something we’re born with, like they claim. It’s conditioned by society. There is also solid scientific evidence that it’s not genetic, according to studies done on identical twins.

Amos Moses #fundie #transphobia #homophobia disqus.com

Amos Moses:
if they are trannies ..... then they were BORN THAT WAY according to you ...... and if they are homosexual or lesbians ..... THEY WERE BORN THAT WAY according to you ..... and they CANNOT CHANGE according to you ...... so the same STANDARD YOU APPLY ..... applies to PEDOPHILES ........... and it is only YOUR OPINION it is abuse ...... its pretty basic .........

Enniscorthy:
It saddens me greatly that you are advocating for the systemic sexual abuse of children. I thought you were a Christian. I will always fight to protect a child from a sexual abuser. A child's rights far outweigh another person's desire for sexual abuse.

Amos Moses:
No, no, no, no, no ........ YOU have set a STANDARD that LOGICALLY includes PEDOPHILES ...... YOUR STANDARD ...... and i am trying to get you to see YOUR ERROR .........

Enniscorthy:
Well, I am sitting here saying that under no circumstance would I allow an adult to sexually abuse a child, and you're screaming at me that yes I would. Clearly you don't know what my standard is when you keep telling me the very opposite of what I'm stating. I don't know why you elect to ignore that a child is not party to what the adult does to him or her and that it's somehow okay just because we don't want to be politically correct. In fact, NO ONE feels that way, so you're not just misrepresenting me but practically everyone else out there. No one cares what a pedophile's attractions are. A child must be protected. And no one argues that because it's pretty clear and obvious.
This is why we don't compare homosexuality to pedophilia. If two grown adults are attracted, there's no reason to tell them what they are doing is wrong. Not a single one. But pedophilia is an act of abuse on a child who cannot consent. I'm surprised you have to have this explained to you.

Amos Moses:
but if homosexuals are BORN THAT WAY and it is INNATE ..... and TRANNIES are also BORN THAT WAY and it is INNATE ...... then the same STANDARD YOU SET APPLIES to PEDOPHILES ......... or WHY NOT ...............

Enniscorthy:
This is too, too delicious for words. You accused me of a strawman recently without knowing what it really means. Now I'm going to tell you something: YOU are guilty of a strawman argument.
You keep sitting here telling me that I'm a hypocrite to be OK with homsexuality but not pedophilia when both are innate. The reason that's a strawman is THAT IS NOT WHAT I SAID, and certainly not what I ever meant either.
If somebody's actions, no matter how innate they are, cause a child to be physically and emotionally damaged because of an act of non-consensual abuse, they I will stand against them. That's always been my "standard", not the one you keep INSISTING is my standard and I never never once claimed. "Innate" is NOT my argument, it's the one you keep TELLING me is my argument. And "born that way", which again I never said and don't even particularly believe.
So the reason I'm OK with homosexuality but not pedophilia is because in one situation an innocent party is abused, and in the other, no one is abused. It is consensual. THAT is my argument, informed consent, not whether it's INNATE.

Amos Moses:
NOPE .... it is applying the STANDARD you have set for SEXUALITY ...... and if it changes or not ...... and how DARE YOU tell a PEDOPHILE he or she has to go through a "sexless life" ............ to not have sex with a person he or she loves ..... who do you think you are ...... /sarc off ....... and there is a DIFFERENCE between a strawman argument and SARCASM to ridicule your position ............

Enniscorthy:
Here you are again, telling me the "standard I have set for sexuality." If it's my so-called "standard", why don't you tell me where or when I ever said it? Once again, reading what you've written here, it sounds very much like you're putting the rights of a pedophile over the child they choose to abuse. Are you doing this to make fun of my position, because once again, that ISN'T my position. I say protect the child at all costs and have always said that. The pedophile's attractions (not love, as you said) are irrelevant if a child gets hurt. Whether strawman or sarcasm (and you've used both), you are deliberately misrepresenting my standards, and my position and my beliefs.

Max Roscoe #transphobia #sexist returnofkings.com

Japan Bans Chicks With Dicks

Max Roscoe

is an aspiring philosopher king, living the dream, travelling the world, hoarding FRNs and ignoring Americunts. He is a European at heart, lover of Latinas, and currently residing in the USA.

At the risk of breaking a personal journalistic rule of devoting far too much time to an incredibly miniscule and unimportant issue, I must draw attention to a recent win for masculinity. The island nation of Japan recently made a common sense decision regarding the extremely minute portion of its population that is dealing with the first world problem of its genitalia not matching the perceived sex of the owner, known in the West as transsexuals or “gender questioning individuals” to use the word salad nonsensical parlance of the day.

image
Sure thing, toots, just as soon as you lose the balls.

First, I should clarify that no one is being banned, deported, or shipped out of the country in a way that a more aggressive nation like Saudi Arabia might handle this issue. Instead Japan has a simple policy which efficiently handles the transsexual question—one that seems to bewilder and confuse the Western world, who must devote weekly news articles, federal legislation, prime time (((television programming))) and endless discussion on how to handle this fraction of a percentage of its population.

It works like this: do you have a penis? If yes then you cannot be a chick. It’s as simple as that.

With that one universal test, Japan has disposed of the endless head-scratching and policy making by Western politicians, critics, and social justice warriors about how to describe their private parts on government identification cards or which restrooms to pee in. In Japan you will be considered a man as long as you have a penis. End of story.

Likewise, if you have a vagina, you will be considered a woman. No matter what clothes you are wearing, how deep your voice is, or how you choose to “identify” that day. The beauty is in the simplicity.

image
Japanese Sex Change Operation

While Western nations must debate and compromise, legislate and propose, carving out exceptions for this or that behavior and endlessly consulting irate social justice warriors in a futile attempt to placate them, Japan disposes with the entire question of transsexual people with the simple question.

In the Japanese system, Bruce Jenner would not once have been a news story during my lifetime, as he has done nothing newsworthy since winning a 1976 Olympic medal. If and when he actually removes his penis and replaces it with a surgical vagina (Sugina from hereon), only then could he be properly considered a female and could announce he would like to be referred to as Caitlyn. (A person changing their sex is still not a newsworthy story to me, but I suppose there are those who would be interested to know what happened to this former hero of theirs).

image

Japan is a fascinating nation. As an island nation, it is naturally more isolated than most cultures, and is able to control physically and culturally what enters its society. Japan is one of the more difficult countries to immigrate to, and I have been told that Japanese will never fully accept Westerners, even if you take a Japanese wife and live there for decades (and why should they, as those actions will make you no more Japanese than Bruce Jenner installing a sugina will make him a woman).

Japan is one of the only societies in the world that was never controlled by Europeans. It holds on to its traditions, and has a strong history of physical fitness including the samurai warrior. While Westerners are committing virtual seppuku because they touched a woman’s butt in 1984, Japanese businessmen will glibly walk to a vending machine and purchase a high school girl’s panties for sexual purposes.

image
An oddity to a westerner, but in Japan men are not ashamed to be men

Odd? Sure, and I’m not going to even go down the road of weird Japanese kinks and bizarre pornography, but the point is the Japanese are proudly Japanese, and will not let others shame them into changing their behavior. I will always remember the line from James Bond’s You Only Live Twice concerning women and men, which made an indelible impression on me since childhood.

image
In Japan, men always come first. Women come second.

What Is A Woman?

Outside of the West in The Current Year, I doubt anyone has given this question serious thought, but today, sadly, it is necessary. If you ask yourself what truly makes someone a woman, It comes down to whether they have a penis or a vagina in their pants.

image
“OK is She REALLY a man or a woman?” Can only refer to one thing.

While there are levels of masculinity and feminity which vary between the sexes, at the end of the day, if you really want to know someone’s sex, you want to know what genitalia they have. All Japan is doing is confirming, yes, that is exactly what sex means.

TransTrenders: Belittling Those Who Are Truly Victims

Just as feminists are opposed to true diversity, the public discussion of sexual dysphoria is a distraction from the minority of people who have real problems with their sexual identification.

Just as those who suffer from the horrible crime of violent rape do NOT want to publicly discuss their traumatic past, those who suffer from rare sexual disorders or chromosomal mutations that affect their sexuality are embarrassed and saddened by their condition. Those who truly have a medical condition which causes their genitalia to be deformed, or not match the sex they mentally feel, or who were a victim of a botched (((circumcision))) want to quietly rectify the problem and live life without others knowing about the unpleasant thing that happened in their past.

The LAST thing they want is to publicly exclaim that they were one sex and are now the other. Which seems to be ALL that being a trans-trender is about. Watch a Youtube video of a prominent transtrender like Justin “Riley” Dennis, and all you were hear is endless talk about their gender identification or their transition (despite the fact that they have rarely if ever actually snipped off the bits and therefore have transformed nothing).

Common Sense: A Lost Idea In The West

image
Dr. Wang, Japan’s Top Sex Change Doctor

By forcing those who claim their sex is “wrong” to surgically correct their sex, Japan is calling their bluff and separating the trans-trenders from the trans-genders. There is no further debate or discussion needed with such a policy. While the West is trying to fire, fine or even imprison academics for using the wrong (read: gramatically correct) gender pronouns when referring to snowflake students, Japan has a simple system: If you want to be a woman, you need to have a vagina. If you weren’t born with one, get one first and check back with us.

A Win-Win Policy

While most of us probably aren’t comfortable with the idea of going to bed with someone who was born a man, the truth is, if one are attractive enough, and has a vagina, men will want to sleep with you, especially if they don’t know about your past (this is a universal truth, not specific to trannies). So if potential trannies really want acceptance by men in the sexual marketplace, this is exactly the model they should be following.

Next page