latest

This dream began with a brief scene playing out where Trump was in a public restroom (all white tiles, walls, and floor) and staring at himself in the mirror. He was next to the mirror and sink which were closest to the exit, and his demeanor reminded me as if he were being filmed (like a reality show).

The scene now changes and I'm with Trump, and we're inside something like this large, somewhat dim warehouse building which reminded me of a cross between a flea market and a department store.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: A "burnt event" is coming.

I was beside Trump when he said this line, and I perceived that I was either his Vice President or close advisor.

And upon hearing him say that, I was immediately alarmed over the fact that he, somehow, knew about the "fiery kickoff event" prophesied of by servants of the Lord such as Jeff Byerly and others (i.e. more than one servant is prophesying of this event).

Next thing I know, I'm now separated from Trump and am near the entrance of this dim warehouse with his wife, Melania. As I proceed to walk with her, she then briefly walks away from me and off to my left. I recall her wearing something similar to the Calvin Klein outfit that she wore at the U.N. Assembly.

In response, I yell out something like, "Melania-san! Mattemashou"

In Japanese (if I spelled the hiragana out correctly), this phrase appears to primarily translate into the command "let's wait!". However, my intention was to get her to come back and follow me, as we looked for President Trump.

She then follows , as we walk further along and come across Trump and some others sitting at the end of this narrow, wooden table that is oval-shaped. I take an empty seat directly across from Trump, while Melania seats herself down next to Trump, on his right.

(At this point, I then stared closely at Melania's face, from across the table. While she's attractive in real life -- her face here was white-pale and even somewhat ghastly, as her lifeless eyes were fixed and staring off-ward; as if she, herself, was not consciously present...)

I then say the following words, near-verbatim, to Trump:

ME: Sir, what do you know about the "fiery kickoff event"?

This was his near-verbatim response to me:

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Do you know how corrupt the Department of Education is?!

PRESIDENT TRUMP: (continues speaking...)

I cannot recall what he said further to me, but I do generally remember that Trump did go into more detail about government corruption -- and by his tone, it was like he was justifying the results that this event would bring.

After finishing, he was very stern as he said something to me like "Are you with me, or not?"

In response...and dejected at the words that he spoken...I then quietly agreed with him.

/end entry

One other detail: before having this dream, I recall briefly being awake and being in a genuine period of prayer for Trump's salvation...and even weeping a little over him.

INTERPRETATION

- Trump in the public restroom

I believe this signifies how Trump is being watched -- even in his most private settings (being as the restroom that he was preparing in was a public one). To me, he behaved as though cameras were rolling on him, as he was checking himself in the mirror and preparing for whatever he was about to do.

- Large, dim interior warehouse building

I believe the setting of this dim building represented the secret nature of what was going on.

- Trump's statement of a "burnt event"

...for one, I'm curious at Trump's wording, in using the term "burnt" over the term "fiery" that has been repeated in multiple prophetic words given by the Lord. It would seem, though,to match up with how Trump uses more simplistic vocabulary; when either tweeting, or giving speeches.

- Melania's pale-white, ghoulish face, with spaced-out, lifeless eyes

...This could, possibly, symbolize a kind of high-level mind control on Melania. In the past, I've read about such things as "MK Ultra", and wouldn't be surprised at something similar being used on Trump's wife (...so that she wouldn't go public with this info?).

- Narrow wooden, and oval-shaped, table

In addition to the large, dim warehouse, I believe that this may have represented just how secret this agenda of Trump's was, amongst his closest advisors.

- Trump's mentioning of the Department of Education

This may indicate how the Dept. of Education is, indeed, corrupt, in the sheer manner of mind control unleashed upon our young children. That is to say, from even an early age, our children are diligently fed lies in our government controlled schools, ranging from: Big Bang Theory, Theory of Evolution, false versions of history, LGBT abominations, etc. Therefore, I believe that this gives further reason to speculate on Donald Trump's motives (from his remark in my dream).

- Trump's justifying tone, regarding the "burnt event"

I believe I've read, in other prophetic words, that Trump, at this point has entrenched himself within the "swamp" of corruption within our government. Lord knows how much he's been exposed to, spiritually. Therefore, he could possibly have a hand in all this before it happens...in working his "art of the deal" in the process.

- - - - - - -

Lord of Lords and Kings of Kings, I plead Your precious, eternal covenant blood (Revelation 12:11) over this entry, this website, and for all folks that visit. Please, in this dire hour, draw many (both saved and lost) to Your warnings; whether You direct them here or to Your other servants. Please wrestle with them as You wrestled with Jacob over the urgency of this hour, and the truths of Your Word and Your modern-day words, which do not contradict the Scriptures. And in acknowledgement of Romans 7:21, I bind every wicked spirit in assignment against this website (Luke 10:19), and cancel every wicked plan against this website in the spirit realm, in Your mighty Name of names.

Thank You Lord, an all glory to You. Amen.

EPA chemical review would exclude millions of tons of toxins

By MATTHEW BROWN

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) - Spurred by the chemical industry, President Donald Trump's administration is retreating from a congressionally mandated review of some of the most dangerous chemicals in public use: millions of tons of asbestos, flame retardants and other toxins in homes, offices and industrial plants across the United States.

Instead of following President Barack Obama's proposal to look at chemicals already in widespread use that result in some of the most common exposures, the new administration wants to limit the review to products still being manufactured and entering the marketplace.

For asbestos, that means gauging the risks from just a few hundred tons of the material imported annually while excluding almost all of the estimated 8.9 million tons (8.1 million metric tons) of asbestos-containing products that the U.S. Geological Survey said entered the marketplace between 1970 and 2016.

Lawmakers say the review was intended to be the first step toward enacting new regulations needed to protect the public. But critics - including health workers, consumer advocates, members of Congress and environmental groups - contend ignoring products already in use undermines that goal.

The administration's stance is the latest example of Trump siding with industry. In this case, firefighters and construction workers say the move jeopardizes their health.

Both groups risk harm from asbestos because of its historical popularity in construction materials ranging from roofing and flooring tiles to insulation used in tens of millions of homes. Most of the insulation came from a mine in a Montana town that's been declared a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund site and where hundreds of people have died from asbestos exposure.

"Hundreds of thousands of firefighters are going to be affected by this. It is by far the biggest hazard we have out there," said Patrick Morrison, assistant general president for health and safety at the International Association of Fire Fighters. "My God, these are not just firefighters at risk. There are people that live in these structures and don't know the danger of asbestos."

Asbestos fibers can become deadly when disturbed in a fire or during remodeling, lodging in the lungs and causing problems including mesothelioma, a form of cancer. The material's dangers have long been recognized. But a 1989 attempt to ban most asbestos products was overturned by a federal court, and it remains in widespread use.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health analyzed cancer-related deaths among 30,000 firefighters from Chicago, Philadelphia and San Francisco. The 2015 study concluded firefighters contract mesothelioma at twice the rate of other U.S. residents.

Firefighters also face exposure to flame retardants included in the EPA's review that are used in furniture and other products.

"I believe the chemical industry is killing firefighters," said Tony Stefani, a former San Francisco fireman who retired in 2003 after 28 years when diagnosed with cancer he believes resulted from exposure to chemicals in the pending review.

Stefani said he was one of five in his station to contract cancer in a short period. Three later died, while Stefani had a kidney removed and endured a year of treatment before being declared cancer-free.

"When I entered the department in the early 70s, our biggest fear was dying in the line of duty or succumbing to a heart attack," he said. "Those were the biggest killers, not cancer. But we work in a hazardous-materials situation every time we have a fire now."

Mesothelioma caused or contributed to more than 45,000 deaths nationwide between 1999 and 2015, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study in March. The number of people dying annually from the disease increased about 5 percent during that time.

Congress ordered the EPA review last year to gauge risks of asbestos and nine other highly toxic substances and find better ways to manage them for public safety.

In one of its last acts under Obama, the EPA said in January it would judge the chemicals "in a comprehensive way" based on their "known, intended and reasonably foreseen uses."

Under Trump, the agency has aligned with the chemical industry, which sought to narrow the review's scope. The EPA now says it will focus only on toxins still being manufactured and entering commerce. It won't consider whether new handling and disposal rules are needed for "legacy," or previously existing, materials.

"EPA considers that such purposes generally fall outside of the circumstances Congress intended EPA to consider," said EPA spokeswoman Enesta Jones, adding the agency lacks authority to regulate noncommercial uses of the chemicals.

One of the law's co-authors, New Mexico Democratic Sen. Tom Udall, disputes that Congress wanted to limit the review.

"It doesn't matter whether the dangerous substance is no longer being manufactured; if people are still being exposed, then there is still a risk," Udall told The Associated Press. "Ignoring these circumstances would openly violate the letter and the underlying purpose of the law."

Rep. Frank Pallone of New York, ranking Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said the EPA was deferring to the chemical industry's wishes at the expense of public health.

Democrats and public health advocates have criticized EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt for hiring two people - Nancy Beck, the agency's deputy assistant administrator for chemical safety, and Liz Bowman, its associate administrator for public affairs - who formerly worked for the American Chemistry Council, the industry's lobbying arm.

The council pushed back against the Obama administration's interpretation of the law, urging the EPA's new leadership to narrow its review. The Trump administration did that in June.

"Did we get everything we wanted? No. But we certainly agree the (Trump) administration put forth a reasonable final rule," said council vice president Michael Walls. Broadening the review, he added, would send the EPA "down a rabbit hole chasing after illusory risks."

The politically influential National Association of Homebuilders, which represents the residential construction industry, fears broadly interpreting the new law would lead to burdensome regulations that are unnecessary because it says asbestos disposal rules already are adequate.

Many of those regulations are based on a 1994 Occupational Safety and Health Administration finding that materials had to contain at least 1 percent asbestos to qualify for regulation. But public health experts say the 1 percent threshold is arbitrary.

"It's bad medicine, and it's harmful," said Michael Harbut, an internal medicine professor at Detroit's Wayne State University and medical adviser to an insulation workers' union.

"There's still a lot of asbestos out there," said Harbut, who helped establish criteria used by physicians to diagnose and treat asbestos-related diseases. "It's still legal, it's still deadly, and it's going to be a problem for decades to come."