I also found the location of Socrates' plagiarism from the New Testament:

1 Corinthians 1:25 "For God's foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God's weakness is stronger than human strength."

8 Ways to Ensure Your Daughter Won't Become a Mudshark
Nothing is more terrifying to a father of a beautiful White* daughter than to see her walk hand in
hand with a Negro who will ultimately abuse her emotionally, physically, financially or socially.
Then he will inherit grandchildren who do not remotely resemble him.

Here are some tips you as parents can use to hopefully ensure your daughter doesn't go the Nicole Brown path.

1. Do not allow television programs featuring interracial relationships or White men appearing inferior to "Negroe Knights."

The media loves picking the fit buck Negroes for commercials, television programs and other visual garbage and putting them next to weak, feminine and pathetic White men. They are trying to say "pick Terry Crews with his 8-pack and huge penis or this weak balding White guy."

2. Do not allow access to media like music and sports that features and glorifies Negroes.

Many of these "artists" have lyrics sexualizing White women including songs about White women giving Black men oral sex. The Jew also promotes the Negro as the super athlete who when he makes gets rewarded with a White blonde wife. How many White dates have drove their daughters to concerts of Negro hiphop and rap performers to be around Negro men grabbing at their crotch? Also, do not let your daughter idolize female pop stars who get down with coloreds.
They will ultimately try to emulate their behavior.

3. Do not allow your daughter to become overweight or have low self-esteem.

Male Negroes are predators for these type of White girls. It's well known that Negro men love overweight women. As far as they are concerned, more "cushion for the pushin'." What ends up happening is the overweight or low self-esteem White girl doesn't get any attention from the White guys so when the Negro who is just out for some ass pays her attention she falls in love and realizes that is all she can get. You then have a mudshark for life who will end up getting impregnated.

4. Do not allow your daughter to play sports that are similarly enjoyed by Negroes.

Time and time again, White females who are basketball players or cheerleaders are constantly around Negro men. Your White cheerleader daughter has to go and do routines with her pom-poms for the "Negro super athlete." Thus, much of their time will be surrounded by Negro men. The White girls watch the Black boys play and eventually end up spending their extracurricular time with them. Before you know it, she'll go from dribbling a ball to putting a Black penis up to her lips.

6. Do not allow your daughter to be friends with girls who have Negrophilia.

Here is what is going to happen if you do: These girls are ostracized by their parents. They get asked "but don't you like White guys, too?" Their parents just don't get it. But much like when your children are underperforming at school, they say "well, other people in the class failed that test too" to validate their own failure. White girls who are into Negro men do the same thing. They try to lure their friends into the lifestyle so they can say "well, Britney likes Black guys too so who cares?" It's the most elementary form of social peer pressure.
They are constantly trying to recruit their friends to their lifestyle.

7. Do not allow your daughter to feel White culture is bland compared to modern Negro culture.

"White boyz be bland" is what they will say. They'll say White men are not dominant enough because their songs are not as sexually suggestive or as interesting. Once Whiteness is seen as unoriginal or boring they will think the work of 50 Cents or one of the Kartrashian boyfriends is superior to that of Socrates, Nikola Tesla, or Thomas Edison. White women who have no respect for the hard work, ingenuity, and creativity of the White male culture will undoubtedly become mudsharks.

8. Don't push too much.

"You are not permitted to date Black boys" and obsessive reminders are only going to push your children to rebel against you. Gentle, consistent reminders will suffice. But making it constantly known how banned this type of behavior is will only make the forbidden fruit more desired, so to speak. Let them know once. Once the behavior starts to lead in that direction do what you can to gently influence their behavior and time spent away from going down this road and you should be just fine. Otherwise, ride them over it and expect to have grand kids who do not look like you.

On the Current State

I intend to lay out the woes of our modern world and the solution to these great ills which infest our great and noble civilization like a cancer. We have been beguiled by the mindset in which we have been indoctrinated since our births, that somehow democracy and republicanism are virtues, but this is under the false promise of freedom. These ideals are seductive and bring the ignorant much in the form of entertainment; however, the great experiment of democracy has been tried and found wanting and has in turn created within us the spirit of degeneracy. The Liberalism of our age has made the false assumption that whatsoever is old is not of any use. Liberalism makes oh-so-many promises of what has taken to name “progress” but has never once thought of where it may be progressing from. It has also rendered us a society which is unaware of its destination. It wishes to place us under the yoke of slavery, a cruel tyrant, under the guise of so-called freedom and liberty, by which we have been blinded to its ignoble ends and the eminent destruction of Western Civilization.

How is it that democratic republicanism is in reality a terrible evil? In truth, democracy is evil because it allows for the worst and most evil kind of tyranny, the one which democracy calls into service on its behalf: oligarchy. The second tyrant of the republic is the mob. The tyranny of the mob has been noted since the earliest days of democracy (and by much more qualified persons than myself.) However, the mob is second to the oligarchs (those damnable and wretched politicians) because they are the ones who incite the mob against anyone who challenges their status quo; by the mystic sway of the politicians and their lies, it was the mob who murdered both Socrates and Christ because they challenged politicians’ power, they challenged the world to think as I write to you now.

The mob is the faceless tyrant which we do not know, like the headless body of a beast. The oligarchs act as the head, and this head rules by its own will and not the will of the people. The politicians have existed only for self-gain at the expense of the people; in turn, they create a mob and influence its will. In this way the people forfeit their true freedom and become puppets of men, play-things which exist only to be taxed. Those powers that claim to want aid for the poor and disenfranchised only make them but wage slaves and slaves of the state. Our most basic fundamental human right has been robbed and this is the right to think. For once it is destroyed no one may challenge the tyrants.

Those very things Liberalism is wont to preach, it now seeks to destroy. In this American Republic, we see the fruit of such a wicked system as our fellow traditionalists are brought on charges in civil and criminal court because they would not violate their consciences before God or man (these stand as martyrs for thought). Any idea of the American citizen being free is quickly vanishing. We are free in name only. The Liberals enforce their wills as law by limiting the ability to think in the realm of education and by the introduction of unnatural vice as societal norms.

For what I shall next propose, some would brand me as a traitor to this country. But I ask that those who make such claims be considered, and that we ask why they would be enticed to attack me so. I defend myself with this: one may by loyal to his county (a true and real patriot) without once ounce of loyalty or respect to his government. Our current government isn’t for the people, nor by the people, but has become a government for itself. It is corrupt in every way and at every level. We may not and cannot afford to trust the politicians because they have proven themselves to be only interested in their own gains and would see the nation burn if it mean that they could be elected again. No matter how sincere one may be, they are sincerely evil in their motives, or evil due to an ignorance of all that is just and right. They have forfeited virtue, and virtue is the spirit of a nation. Without such a spirit, the nation shall die.

Many would wish us traditionalists dismissed as a lunatic fringe or the alternative right. We are neither. We are men of reason and principle. We preach no nationalism aside from how all within a nation are family to which they belong; but a family without a head is broken, and a nation without a king is likewise broken. All who live under the tyrant of the American Republic are as orphaned children who are without true love from true parents, and are tossed about a troubled sea of foster parents and surrogates which care not for that which they neither gave birth to or created.

We shall only be free of this tyranny once we have replaced the imperial Republic with a real Emperor, reforming it into a Christian State. For ideals, of God is the grandest among them, and He has for Himself a kingdom and no republic. He sits as emperor of the universe. Only when we mirror heaven shall it be made like heaven, and only when we adopt the ideal shall we attain it. For now we mirror hell, and all people cast their votes in the affirmative, and they get what they want with all the pain attached to it. Not all poison is bitter, but it is the sweet poisons which we ingest readily. Many times, just as the medicine is bitter, so is truth, but it is these which heal and preserve us til the next day.

The movie “For the Bible tells me so” (forthebibletellsmeso.org) was shown in my home community of Flint, Michigan in the fall of 2008 as part of a series of gay events called “Out’N About.” Although the movie was billed as a documentary, it was first and foremost a gay propaganda film.

The movie has two distinct elements to it. The documentary element examines the lives of five homosexuals and how their immediate families responded to their homosexuality. That part of the movie is actually a documentary, interesting, emotionally moving, and somewhat objective. The other part of the movie is pure gay political propaganda arranged to disparage conservative Christians and present the gay political movement as the enlightened possessors of the real truth about homosexuality.
From my observations as a scholar on the gay political movement this movie has the imprint of the gay political organization known as Soulforce (www.soulforce.org).

Soulforce has been a branch of the gay political movement specifically targeting the Bible believing Christian church. Mel White is a cofounder of Soulforce and a prominent leader in the gay political movement. A favorite target of Mel White and Soulforce has been Dr. James Dobson and his organization Focus on the Family (www.focusonthefamily.com).
The fact that the movie specifically targets Dr. James Dobson and that Dr. Mel White is a predominant spokesperson throughout the movie gives the Soulforce manipulation away. The movie at the time of this writing was featured on the Soulforce website and on the website of America’s largest gay lobbying organization – The Human Rights Campaign. A fifty page study guide comes with the movie to assist in molding the interested convert into an advocate for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender equality with heterosexuality.
Besides the deception and lies presented as truths, the gay theology espoused in the film claiming that the Bible does not condemn homosexual behavior is considered by many a self-serving concoction. It would take a whole book to accurately address all the deception and lies in the propaganda part of the movie, so I will select instances that best support my accusations.
Scientific lies and deception
Like most gay propaganda the movie begins its justification of homosexuality by contending that homosexuality is not something that is not chosen.

Conservative Christians knowledgeable on homosexuality, including ex-gays, and psychotherapists who help people overcome unwanted same-sex attractions, agree that clinical science has shown that homosexual attractions are not usually something that an individual chooses. That there is agreement on this point is never brought up in gay propaganda and it is not acknowledged in the movie. Instead Christians, ex-gays, and therapists who disagree with the gay worldview are shown as ninnies who ignore this and other clinical facts. Knowledgeable Christians, ex-gays, and therapists do distinguish between attractions and behavior, and most certainly maintain that individuals have a choice of whether or not they engage in any form of sexual behavior. This distinction is never mentioned in gay propaganda or the movie.

Gay propaganda and clinical science diverge after the fact that homosexuals do not choose their attractions to the same sex. Using that fact as a premise gay propaganda and the movie conclude that homosexuality is an innate condition that is unchangeable and therefore equivalent to heterosexuality. The movie specifically states that “sexual orientation cannot be changed or prevented.”

There are no facts to support the innate theory, so the movie shows a cartoon series that mocks the clinical evidence on the causal factors of homosexuality and sexual orientation change. What researchers have found is that male homosexuals usually have had past experiences of prolonged rejection by the same sex parent and same sex peers throughout childhood. As a child the homosexual never felt he was a part of his gender group, and the longing to be part of the group and the mystery of the same sex turned into same-sex attractions at puberty. This is not always the causal route to male homosexuality, but it has been documented enough to be referred to as the standard causal route.

Clinical science has also documented hundreds of cases where homosexuals have changed their sexual orientation. The evidence is overwhelming. The movie claims ex-gay organizations and psychotherapists use shame and guilt to coax homosexuals to repress their true feelings, thereby presenting ex-gay organizations as a sham and destructive to the mental well being of homosexuals. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The truth is that ex-gay organizations like Exodus International (www.exodus.to) offer real hope to individuals with unwanted same-sex attractions. Many individuals have overcome homosexual behavior and desires. A significant percentage have changed their sexual orientation, married a person of the opposite sex, and raised families.
A sexual orientation change from homosexual to heterosexual is partly a reparative process and partly a cognitive process. Motivation is the main part of the cognitive process. The motivation usually comes from religious beliefs, aspirations of a heterosexual marriage, and from a fact that gay propaganda avoids like the plague, which is that many who enter the gay world find its lifestyle very destructive. The main part of the reparative process is to understand and deal with the memories and hurt of same-sex rejection in childhood. Often there was sexual abuse that contributed to the unwanted same-sex attractions. This short introduction on the causal factors of homosexuality is more accurate than the sum of all the causal information in the movie. The movie mocks this knowledge, and in doing so mocks the truth.

Theological lies and deception

A Rev. Keene makes the statement in the movie that “All loving relationships are honored in the Bible.” This is an easily refutable lie. In the same chapter of Leviticus where homosexuality is condemned there are a number of family related sexual relationships that are prohibited. Surely sexual relationships between close relatives can be loving relationships, yet contrary to Mr. Keene they are condemned. Likewise, Leviticus 18:22 reads “Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman: that is detestable.” There is no insinuation that if a man lies with another man as one lies with a woman in a loving relationship, then it is equal to a heterosexual loving relationship.

In the New Testament the Apostle Paul was informed of a man in the Corinth church who was in a loving relationship with his stepmother. Paul told the church in Corinth to “Expel the wicked man from among you” (I Corinthians 5:13). In another incidence John the Baptist was martyred for saying that it was immoral for King Herod to marry his brother’s wife (Mark 6:18). Mr. Keene’s statement is a fabrication of what he wants the Bible to say.

Mr. Keene’s statement is also a misrepresentation of gay and liberal morality. Liberal sexual morality is based on consensual sex and is not dependent on a loving relationship or marriage. In general consensual sex without love in this moral code is as just as moral as sex in a loving relationship.
The movie presents many arguments of the new gay theology. The most amusing is “What did Jesus say about homosexuality?” The answer is “nothing,” if one ignores his comparison of the destruction of Sodom and the fate of those who did not repent after seeing miracles and hearing the gospel message (Luke 10:12). The sin of bestiality (humans having sex with animals), which happens to be listed in Leviticus 18:23 right after homosexuality, was not mentioned by Jesus in the written record of the gospels. If we use the gay logic that because Jesus did not mention homosexuality it is not immoral, then the same logic applies to bestiality, and it too is no longer immoral behavior.

When one examines Satan’s appearance in the Bible as a serpent in the Garden of Eden or tempting Jesus in the wilderness, it becomes evident that Satan’s method of persuasion is to present half truths. Likewise gay propaganda often persuades with half truths. One such instance in the movie was the gay theological argument that God’s condemnation of Sodom was not because the city was steeped in homosexual behavior, but because it was inhospitable.
The half truth that gay theology presents is that Sodom was indeed inhospitable to the two angels sent to their city in the form of handsome young men. Instead of welcoming the strangers, the men of Sodom sought to anally rape the young men. What the movie does not reveal is that in the ancient world accepted homosexual behavior was not two men of the same sex in a loving reciprocal relationship. It was a dominate man sodomizing a subordinate man or youth, usually a slave or captive from a battle. It was considered a humiliation for a man to be sodomized in any type of relationship.
In a related half truth the movie states that pederasty (an adult man sodomizing an adolescent male) is not homosexuality. It is true that pederasty is considered a specific sexual orientation in itself, but it is definitely a form of homosexuality. Intellectual elites in Ancient Greece during the time of Plato and Socrates considered arranged pederasty relationships the most preferred of all loving relationships. In the late 1980s gay authors Kirk and Madsen referred to the pederasty relationships of ancient Greece as the “traditional gay family.” The values of the Grecian society allowed the free man to not only have sexual relations with his wife, but also prostitutes, both female and male slaves, and a young free man to whom he would also be a mentor. When the young free man became an adult the pederasty relationship ended, because it was dishonorable for a man to be sodomized or have effeminate characteristics.

Deception in the storytelling

The five families featured in the movie were rated as to how supportive they were to their gay child. One family, the Reitans, was given the distinction of being “LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) Advocates.” In the movie the family is shown taking part in a Soulforce sponsored demonstration at the Focus on the Family facility in Colorado Springs. With his parents at his side the gay child, Jake, makes the accusation that Focus on the Family teaches parents to reject their children.

Mary Lou Wallner was given the distinction of being “Very Unsupportive (Initially)” Mary Lou’s lesbian daughter, Anna, committed suicide. Mary Lou Wallner is now an advocate for gay rights and has been touring the nation in support of the movie. In one part of the movie she tells the videographer that she blames Dr. James Dobson for the suicide of her daughter. At that time in her life Mary Lou was a member of a conservative Christian church that believed homosexual behavior was sin. She also followed the advice of Dr. James Dobson and did not accept her daughter’s homosexuality. The movie portrays that lack of acceptance as the cause of Anna’s suicide.

The Poteat family was listed as “Partially Supportive.” This family kept an open relationship with their lesbian daughter. They too were conservative Christians, who did not approve of their daughter’s homosexuality, but their daughter was always welcome at her childhood home and she always knew her family loved her, even though they did not approve of her lesbian relationships.
Having been a follower of Dr. James Dobson myself and having attended their controversial “Love Won Out” conferences on homosexuality, I can attest that Focus on the Family does not teach parents to reject their children. Obviously, Jake has never personally investigated Dr. Dobson or Focus on the Family, but relied on second hand information from Soulforce to make his damning accusation.

Focus on the Family and their Love Won Out conferences teach parents to continue to openly love their children while continuing their disapproval of the child’s sexual behavior. Focus tells parents the truth that homosexual attractions are usually not a choice, that sexual orientation change is possible but not easy, and that parents need to love their children just as God loves them, even in their sin. The Poteat family is actually a good example of what Focus and Dr. Dobson teach.

Mary Lou Wallner was present at the screening of the movie I attended in Flint. In my research on homosexuality I have read reports and heard lectures by clinical psychologists that lesbians do not usually seek counseling because of conflicts with their sexual orientation, but rather for distress from broken relationships. In the Q and A following the movie I asked Mary Lou if her daughter had any recent relationship problems before the suicide. Mary Lou revealed that her daughter had recently broken up with her long-time lover and moved in with another lesbian who had three teenage children. About two and a half months into this new relationship the woman asked Mary Lou’s daughter to move out. Shortly after this breakup, the daughter committed suicide.

Mary Lou also revealed that her daughter was always welcome at her childhood home. When her daughter and lesbian partners visited, Mary Lou and her husband let them sleep in the same bed. It became clear very quickly how distorted the movie had portrayed Anna’s suicide and the conservative Christian beliefs Mary Lou once held. The Wallner’s were at least as supportive of their lesbian daughter as the Poteats were, and maybe even more so.
Anna Wallner’s suicide had little to do with her parent’s disapproval of homosexual behavior, but a lot to do with the destructive aspects of lesbian relationships. The movie intentionally distorted this fact and used this terrible tragedy to smear an innocent man and the organization he represents. But this is nothing new, it is standard gay propaganda.

Facts About

Whites also known as Aryans, Caucasoid, Caucasians, Europeans, Christians, Crackers, Honkies, Honkey

-They conquered vast lands, travelled to Asia, discovered North America, South America and Australia,

-They are pure of heart and loyal,

-They are beautiful in physical aspect,

-Their only rivals are jews or asians, others simply can't compete with whites,

-The White race is the only race with diversity of colour. Blonde hair, red hair, brown hair, black hair, blue eyes, red eyes, brown eyes, all in one race. This always rouse the envy of other races who always tried to imitate whites by dying their hair or wearing contact lens,

-The White race is highly intelligent and possesses a unique gift of creation,

-The White race has crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren ice fields,

-It has been responsible for the invention of the printing press, cement, the harnessing of electricity, flight, rocketry, astronomy, the submarine, the telescope, the eye glasses, space travel, firearms, the transistor, radio, television, the telephone, the light bulb, photography, motion pictures, the phonograph, the electric battery, the automobile, the steam engine, railroad transportation, the motorcycle, the bike, the microscope, computers, robots and millions of other technological miracles. It has discovered countless medical advances, different types of architecture or written languages, incredible applications, scientific progress, mathematics, physics, chemistry, astronomy, biology, etc,

-Its members have included such greats as Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Tacitus, Julius Caesar, Napoleon, William the Conqueror, Marco Polo, Washington, Jefferson, Hitler, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Magellan, Columbus, Cabot, Edison, Graham Bell, Pasteur, Leeuwenhoek, Mendel, Darwin, Newton, Galileo, Watt, Ford, Luther, DaVinci, Poe, Tennyson, and thousands upon thousands of other notable achievers.

According to Ussher the universe or the begining of creation is 4004 BC. He based this off the text of the bible and did a good job of it. That would put us at 6012 years since creation.

The flood occured at 2500 BC.

Noah put 7 each of all clean animals and 2 each of all unclean. This is based on barim which is close to Family in our current classification system. So he brought on 2 dog/wolf kind onto the ark. From these two dog/wolf kind come all of the species of dog and wolves that we have today.

God did not need to miraculously create olive branches. The dove picked the branch off of a tree that was just covered by the flood water. It was a tree that was there before the flood, so no creating had to be done. The purpose of the flood was for God to kill all "flesh from the face of the earth" or land dwelling animals. This did not include trees and plant life or fish which were in the oceans.

It is the Uniformatarian dating method that gives us older dates than the 6000 years in the bible. Most modern scientist use this dating method and it ends up putting human artifacts back 10,000 plus years. So for these scientist to put a date of 8000 years on some chinese cave writting is not uncomon for their education. Unfortunately put agaist the bible the dates would be incorrect because nothing can exist before the date of creation. The question is who is wrong God or Man (scientists)?

The pyramids would have no evidence of the flood because they were built after the flood. In Socrates writting of Criteas and Timaeus, the Egyptian scibe refers to a Great Flood in their historical reccord which they were familiar with.

Socrates put an artificial concept such as loyalty to a city above the reality of nature and survival of his genotype.

This is similar to some Whites today who say they will fight to the death for the United States. The United States is an artificial construct and it contains genotypes that are not White, so what they are really saying is that they will give up their lives and their future to protect Blacks; to protect crime filled cities where Whites are being slaughtered. This is pathetic.

We must start understanding what is essential in us and what isn't. What is essential is our genotype. Our nation is in us. It is not land. It is not a constitution. It is not the Star Wars Bar. We are our nation. It is one with our genotype no matter where on Earth we are born. The U.S. was once White and protecting it also protected our genotype. No more.

It is clear therefore that Martin Luther King is an antichrist, a rejecter of Christian Faith and Doctrine and a vile heretic. He is almost akin to another Luther whom we have already discussed about previously in great length, except Martin Luther King (whose real name is Michael Luther King, since he adopted the name “Martin”) was twice the son of hell than Martin Luther the German heretic.

May Christians wake out of their slumber and stop promoting a son of Satan who looked to Greek philosophers for his inspiration rather than Christ our God. This is no slander and I will conclude with this admission from King himself regarding his expectation of who he expected to see on the day before his last day on earth on April 3, 1968:

“As you know, if I were standing at the beginning of time, with the possibility of general and panoramic view of the whole human history up to now, and the Almighty said to me, ‘Martin Luther King, which age would you like to live in?’– I would take my mental flight by Egypt through, or rather across the Red Sea, through the wilderness on toward the promised land. And in spite of its magnificence, I wouldn’t stop there. I WOULD MOVE ON BY GREECE, AND TAKE MY MIND TO MOUNT OLYMPUS. AND I WOULD SEE PLATO, ARISTOTLE, SOCRATES, EURIPIDES AND ARISTOPHANES ASSEMBLED AROUND THE PARTHENON AS THEY DISCUSSED THE GREAT AND ETERNAL ISSUES OF REALITY.” (“I See the Promised Land”, April 3, 1968)

Martin Luther King did not value Christ, the Prophets and the Apostles and Fathers, but rather esteemed the godless Greek philosophers as of greater worth! He most certainly got his eternal wish but now he has realised too late in eternity where that has led him to. May this be a wake-up call for Christians to not worship an antichrist, modernistic heretic and let God be true and every man a liar. (Romans 3:4).

God bless.

John Bolton clandestinely claims he’s related to a very large Masonic Norwegian Neanderthal family that descends directly from Egyptian Pharaoh King Tutankhamen.

Further, that these Egyptian Pharaohs were all created by the Anunnaki God Anu (Yahweh), who used his own DNA (Adams rib) along with the DNA of Zeta Aliens and DNA of Chimpanzees to create the Neanderthal species.

Bolton, a top-level Mason, moreover believes the Aryan race likewise, was also created from the DNA of the Anunnaki mixed with the DNA of Rhesus monkey, whereby proxy, created an entirely different species of mankind.

The source for this article is John Bolton’s nephew, Greg T Dixon, a Masonic High school friend and informant deeply connected with Freemasonry.

Reportedly Bolton and the Illuminati (Masons) believe in addition, that Aryans (Cro-Magnons) are the favored ‘Chosen’ conservative species of the Sumerian (Aryan) ‘God’ Anu (aka Yahweh)
Aryans historically, have been protected by Anu numerous times from the more aggressive Neanderthals repeated genocidal attempts, after flooding them from the face of the planet and rebuilding the Aryan race in their place.

This event has happened at least four times in history, two of which documented in the Bible under Noah and The Exodus.

Anu’s favored (non-aggressive) Aryan race include people like Noah, Socrates, DaVinci, Tesla, Ford, Malcolm X, Hitler and Trump.
<...>
Reportedly, Jews originate from Draco reptilians (the Anunnaki and Zetas both are reptilian as well). Dracos claim they have been living on planet earth since before the Anunnaki and Zetas arrived to create mankind, and therefore considered themselves earth’s original inhabitants.
<...>
Ultimately, “Jews and Neanderthals” (Pharisees and Pharaohs) teamed up together with Lucifer’s ‘Fallen Angles’ (through interbreeding). And along with their offspring, the Nephilim, set out to exterminate the entire Aryan race from the planet – Anu’s favored conservative Cro-Magnon species.

( @Nature_and_Race )
The forbidden philosopher.

And his forbidden philosophy.
image
image

@Nature_and_Race Such beautiful work.

Btw, who's the "forbidden philosopher? Socrates?

( @Toodank2bunderstood )
@Nature_and_Race they hated Hitler because he spoke the truth

( @Occidental_Rome1 )
@Nature_and_Race Let's make this simple:

Race! Unity! Sacrifice/Struggle! self-made:Destiny!

( @AngolaTrader96 )
@Nature_and_Race I first read Mein Kampf in Summer 2017. I became Jew-wise only about 5-6 months before then. Mein Kampf helped me articulate my viewpoints better. It gave me much more confidence in my ideology.

( @Karen_Melzer )
@Nature_and_Race no Hitler. Because he gaught the right enemy and his ideology was patriotic

( @UltramegaJew )
@Nature_and_Race
>Translated by (((Ralph Manheim)))
https://web.archive.org/web/20220426051902/https://anoccasionalcomment.blogspot.com/2019/11/regarding-english-translations-of-mein.html
image

( @Nature_and_Race )
@UltramegaJew -- Manheim wasn't Jewish. He never said he was Jewish, nor did the Jews claim him at any point of his life or after his death.

Thus far, the Manheim translation is the most accurate in both letter and spirit, though far from perfect.

( @anotherjessica96 )
@Nature_and_Race is mein kamp his only writing? I already have read two versions, and i have a book on his speeches, the only thing left is for me to read that german philospsher he mentions in mein kampf, cant remember his name. What am i missing?

The scriptures, and God's people were around long before Socrates. As many of the scriptures the man God Personally chose, and appeared to, -Paul, often referred to! And Paul was smart enough, and honest enough to admit it!!!

If there is no God, then morality, or "ethics" are meaningless. Socrates and Aristotle were just men who had an opinion. There had no authority to define morality.Since He is God, He has the authority to tell people what to do, and what not to do. I realize YOU want to make the rules, but you can't.Allah is not the God of the Bible. ISIS is breaking God's moral law, for which they will be judged by God. Aristotle's opinions are binding on no one.Allah is not real. And even if it was real, it is not God Almighty. Not the Creator of the universe. Who has the authority to define good and evil, and the authority and ability to hold people accountable to those definitions? Certainly not Aristotle.I don't think you posses the ability to understand what constitutes proof. If you did, you would not have to ask the question.

( @Nature_and_Race )
jews are openly calling for the abolition of free speech.

This is why anti-semitism exists in the first place. This is why people hate jews.

jews are a threat to White people's freedom.
image

( @KR91 )
@Nature_and_Race But I'm told 109+ countries only hated them because they were racist and jealous (despite that obviously contradicting the fact that they originally let them in, and many of these countries still had non-Jewish minorities).

( @BloodyProphecy )
@Nature_and_Race To protect TRUE freedom of speech, as well as all our other rights, we MUST fight back against Semitism.

( @voxpopuli2020 )
@Nature_and_Race It didnt work on social media and it wont work on college campuses,
"ideas rise of their own accord" - Socrates
Antisemitism is an idea whose time has come.

( @hecy666 )
@Nature_and_Race You can say anything you want....so long as it doesn't offend the JEWS!

( @gardianAngel )
@Nature_and_Race

What is happening to certain people now will be the norm when the Jews have shaped all the laws of the nations to suit them!
then, we will have it really deep in our .... !
NOW, IS THE TIME TO FIGHT THIS ROT 😡👿

( @Darkraut )
@Nature_and_Race The only thing that happens here is kikes continue down an insane path and we end up rounding them all up and exterminating them, which should have been done thousands of years ago. Looks like it's our time and up to us. I'm excited! I will be known as a jew hunter in my time.

( @Woodzun )
@Nature_and_Race

Seems like all the presidents who were part of the house hearing on antisemitism are going to resign. Oh well, every last one of them hates White people anyway. Good riddance.

Crazy world: we are seeing anti-White University leaders who have been intentionally keeping Whites out of their schools being forced to resign for “antisemitism”.

https://youtu.be/1RzSVZW7ppg

[Similarly, you can tell that Jesus never existed by looking carefully at the things he allegedly said and did. Virtually every detail of the life of Jesus is piecemealed together from stories, phrases, characters, and events in the Old Testament. He’s obviously a work of fiction.]

hmmm, there is more evidence supporting the historical person of Jesus Christ of Nazareth than there is for Plato or Socrates or even Napolean for that matter....(according to amount of accepted ancient manuscripts and secular parallel history)

but..

Because Jesus is so controversial in HIS teaching we have to somehow marginalize HIM out of existence

But they never talk about the Negroe Pathology. They don't know how to masculinize their boys or have any idea of Virtue. Rap Music and Hip Hop is gutter/jungle music of the worst kind. Music, the ghetto music, is very harmful.

Plato explicated the importance of music on how it forms the soul. Music carries Character. Socrates and Plato both pointed out that if you want beautiful people, you have to surround them in a beautiful environment. Beauty works on Beauty. What does Rap Music instill in Black people?

Rage. Hate. Discontent. Abnormality and Dysfunction. The Music is dysfunctional. So the people are dysfunctional who listen to it. What is the favorite music of Liberals? Jazz. Jazz is discompant music. It is ad lib music free from rules of music.

The Laws of Beauty is Proportion, Harmony and Symmetry. When music incorporates that, it implants its character upon the soul listening to it.

Rap, Hip Hop, Jazz (which has its origins in African music and in Negroe America) has very little of any of the above.

It is no wonder that the Negroe communities suffer from so much dysfunctionality. Top of with the Negroe's inablity to control his urges and we see a very dysfunctional race.

The South knew all of this and engaged in segregation and discrimination. It was the Jews that started the NAACP and encouraged and fed Negroe resistance, arrogancy and a bloated ideas of themselves. The Negroe is the shock troops for Jewish globalization, multiculturalism and European dissolution. They are pawns.

Look, the media is Jewish owned. It behooves them to work this up into a mess. They want this. They are increasing the hatred and blowing it up. They are feeding discontent and violence. They want it like that. Why the WASP is friends with the Jews I have no idea. The Jews have destroyed WASP America.

Political Correctness and Social Justice are all anti-civilizational. At their core. America is falling apart at the seams.

Fellow femcels, what petty misandrist thing do you do???

I personally scroll and sometimes rep0rt when I see tweets saying retweet or donate to a sick, injured or poor socrate and his picture lying in hospital bed is attached to it.

It is unscriptural for men to shower naked around other men, let alone in the presence of young boys. This Scripture passage makes this clear. It is not good for men to see each other naked, as evidenced by the pederast homosexual problem. The Romans were infamous for pederasts (men having sex with boys). Socrates, the famous Greek philosopher, was a pederast homosexual.

There is nothing manly about men disrespecting one another by walking around naked in the shower room. It is proper and right for men to show respect for the body, and toward their fellow mankind, by clothing the body. It is more than coincidence that initiates into Luciferian occult groups are required to perform acts of homosexuality as part of their initiation rights. The purpose for this is to debase each other, removing all bastions of decency and reservation between one another. In all sexual relations, even if with a prostitute for a few minutes, a soul-tie is formed between the two people (whether male or female) involved in the act. This is one of the spiritual dangers of sexual immorality, which undermines one's entire soul's health. Proverb 6:32, “But whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he that doeth it destroyeth his own soul.”

I heard an internet radio commercial today advertising the product, “AGELESS MALE,” guaranteed to boost testosterone for men by 61%. Then the advertiser said, “Get back in the game!” That's not why I wrote this article, but the timing was perfect for this article, because it evidences the sinful and irresponsible attitude of society today toward sexual relations. Get back in the game??? Sadly, sex is a game to many people!!! This is the horrible consequence of America's sexually-indecent television programming, promiscuous sitcoms, perverted Late Night comedy shows and TV in general.

I don't watch TV because it is too evil. So when I do occasionally see a TV show on someone else's TV in a hotel or at a restaurant, I am absolutely shocked and angered by what I see and hear. If you watch TV all-the-time, you won't see just how evil it is, because you are sinking into the abyss of wickedness with the hellivision. I guarantee you that if you turn off your television for 6-months that you'll be absolutely shell-shocked when you turn it back on. I hate TV!

It is common practice in health clubs, YMCA's and locker-rooms across America for men to shower naked in the presence of other men, and to walk around naked and let it all hang out. It is uncouth, tasteless, lacking of respect for each other and unscriptural. The same is true of women's locker-rooms. Historically, sports and public nudity have always been synonymous. The Greeks were famous for sports and infamous for nudity.

Genesis 9:21-27 teach us several important life-changing and moral lessons. We see that alcoholic beverages are spiritually dangerous, linked to nakedness and sin. Noah sinned by getting drunk and led his son to sin by doing so. Don't think that Noah didn't think about that either. Noah had to live with the division created between him and his son because of booze. Alcohol brought shame upon Noah. Noah had to live from that day forward knowing that Ham saw him naked and drunk. Although Noah knew he was forgiven in Christ, he caused permanent division between he and his son, Ham.

We also see that Ham sinfully paraded his father's sins, instead of faithfully concealing the matter. America's history books, Wikipedia and newspapers are filled with what husbands and wives have hypocritically said about each other during and after a divorce. The next time you hear a woman talking about how evil her husband is ask her how she obtained perfection. The Bible warns against condemning anyone. James 4:12, “There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?”

By the way, I hate Wikipedia. I've noticed that celebrity profiles (like George Clooney) are locked, but gospel preacher's profiles are open for every snake, rat and God-hating trash to slander and serve roast preacher. Wikipedia is a sewer of American society and Jimmy Wales will give account to God for helping spread malicious gossip. Wikipedia is a weapon. It's easy for some worm who never built a hot-dog stand to throw rocks at a faithful preacher who gave his life to others in the Lord for 50-years, helping literally millions of people in so many ways and changing a nation for God.

Rich Hollywood Chad is a Cannibal and Abusive Sexual Deviant

Every time I think I've seen the limits of caucusoid degeneracy and sickness, something like this comes out. Cannibalism? Really guys? I'm convinced all white people and kikes are inherently mentally ill and deranged. What the fuck is wrong with you people? Make no mistake, all so-called white people are like this. It's just a matter of if they have the power and opportunity. You think the term "white devil" is sarcasm?

Oh and before you mention Papua New Guinea and their flesh-eating ways, they allegedly got that from JEWS.

But since he's chad, no one will care. Women will tune into the doc and talk about how "hot" he is. But if you cold approach the same woman IRL she will call the cops on you cuz you're not chad.

Armie Hammer’s ‘cannibalism’ is just one ‘dark, twisted’ family secret

image

They love to whitewash our history, nothing new there. Acting like they're the only civilization builders.

We were building empires (not just Egypt) when they were banging rocks together and not washing their asses properly. (A caucusoid tendency which continues to THIS DAY).

They stole all of our knowledge and claimed it as their own. That's what the pale-skinned menace does.

Even the likes of Socrates and Plato raved about Africa and studied for YEARS under the tutelage of the REAL sages there. Modern caucusoids don't know shit. They think they invented everything. Stupid cocksuckers.

It should be remembered that ‘democracy’ was originally advocated by the philosophers Plato and Socrates, both homosexual pedophiles. Some contend that these historical facts are irrelevant. There are others who claim that, because of this, democracy is inherently homosexual. This may well be the case. Consider the fact that, just recently, the people of Canada and Spain, along with quite a few other democratic Christian nations, actually voted in favor of same sex marriages. For the first time in more than 2,000 years, the State was now allowed to sanction sodomy as an individual right and to give explicit approval and encouragement to the act of anal sex.

Jews vs. Israelites

Q) ARE THE SO-CALLED NEGROES IN AMERICA AFRICANS? NO!
A) THEY ARE THE REAL HEBREW ISRAELITES (JEWS)!

Read Exodus 11:7 "...That ye may know that the Lord doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel. It's not about COLOR it's about BLOODLINE. The Africans (dark skinned people) descend from Ham;
read Genesis 10:6 while the Israelites come from Shem, Genesis 10:22 (chapter 11 shows the lineage from Shem to Abraham). THE REAL JEWS ARE BLACK (referring to people of brown color) ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE.
Read Jeremiah 14:2 - "Judah mourneth (in sorrow) and the gates (the leaders) thereof languish (grow weaker), they are black unto the ground (meaning different shades of brown).
Read Isaiah 29:22 "...Jacob (Israel) shall not now be ashamed, neither shall his face now wax pale (meaning the Jews would never be Caucasians). We went into slavery because we broke the laws of THE MOST HIGH,
read Deuteronomy 28:15-68. (Read verse 68 especially; it describes the Israelites being sold into slavery by way of "ships") And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt (bondage) again with SHIPS, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shall see it (Jerusalem the homeland) no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your ENEMIES (the whiteman) for bondmen and bondwomen (slaves), and no man shall buy (save) you.

THE ONLY WAY TO GET OUT OF THE CURSES IS TO REPENT AND KEEP THE LAWS. Read Deuteronomy 28:1-14, 2 Chronicles 7:14.

Q) IS CHRIST A SO-CALLED NEGRO ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE?
A) YES!

Read: Hebrews 7:14 - 'For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood'.
Jeremiah 14:2, Revelation 1:1, 13-15, Daniel 10:5-6: ALL OF THE PROPHETS THAT WROTE THE BIBLE WERE OF SO-CALLED NEGROID OR SO-CALLED INDIAN DESCENT.
Also read Lamentations 4:2, 8, Job 30:30, Song of Solomon 1:5-6, Jeremiah 8:21, Exodus 4:4, 6-7, Acts 21:37-39. THEY CALLED THE DISCIPLES NIGER!
Read: Acts 13:1 "NIGER" is a latin word that means black (refering to people of brown color.

Does Jesus (Yahawashi) color matter? Yes. Do not let any wolf-in-sheep clothing, slick willy, preacher in a cheap suit fool you.

Read: St. John 8:32, 17:17, 4:24: If Christ color doesn't matter why do all the ghetto churches in the hood (especially in the south) have a image of a white Jesus. For hundreds of years he was potrayed as being 'white' but as soon as the truth comes out that he is a very dark skinned negro all of a sudden color doesn't matter. CHRIST IS A BLACK MAN - accept it or not the truth is the truth. The brothers in the street teaching the Word will testify that the people who have a hard time accepting this is not the so-called white people or other nations; it's the so-called blacks and hispanics (Israelites) in the ghettos of Amerikkka. Read Hosea 4:6 - "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy GOD, I will also forget thy children."

Other negroes (JEWS) in history: King James, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Shakespeare, the pharoahs of Egypt from the 14th to the 18th dynasties, King Author and the Knights of the round table, Robin Hood, Beethoven, Constantin the great, Spartacus, Hannibal, and Nostradamus just to name a few, whose true images have been changed and white washed.

Q) DOES THE HOLY BIBLE PROPHESY THE ENSLAVEMENT OF THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL?
A) YES!

Read: Deuteronomy 28:15, 47-48, and especially 68: "And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for BONDMAN (slave men) and BONDWOMAN (slave women), and no man shall buy (save) you. When you research the original name of the land of Egypt, it was called MIZRAIM. It is a Greek word meaning BONDAGE.
Read Exodus 20:2: We went into slavery because we broke the laws of The Most High (YHWH) and the only way to get out of the hellish conditions that we are in is to come back to the laws, statutes, and commandments of The Most High.
Read 2Chronicles 7:14: Instead of humbling ourselves, confessing our transgressions, and coming back to The Most High (YHWH) we still continue in our wicked ways, and continue to follow esau (the white man) the devil and father of all lies. Our people are rebellious and stiffhearted (read Ezekiel 2:3-6).

Q) WHAT MUST THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL DO TO SURVIVE AS A NATION?
A) RETURN TO THE HOLY LAWS, STATUTES, COMMANDMENTS & GATHER TOGETHER

Read: Zephaniah 2:1 "Gather yourselves together, yea, gather together, O nation not desired",
Isaiah 34:16 "Seek ye out of the book of the Lord, and read: no one of these shall fail, none shall want her mate: for my mouth it hath commanded, and his spirit it hath gathered them".
Also read: Job 8:8, Deuteronomy 32:7, 2 Chronicles 7:14, Jeremiah 4:1, Malachi 3:7-18, 1st John 3:10-24, and Zephaniah 3:8 "Therefore wait ye upon me, saith the Lord, untill the day that I rise up to the prey: for my determination is to gather the nations, that I may assemble the kingdoms, to pour upon them mine indignation, even all my fierce anger: for all the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my jealousy."

Q) WHO ARE THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL TODAY?
A) See Below...
1. JUDAH.................AFRICAN AMERICANS
2. BENJAMIN............WEST INDIANS
3. LEVI....................HAITIANS
4. SIMEON...............DOMINICANS
5. ZEBULON.............GUATEMALA TO PANAMA
6. EPHRAIM.............PUERTO RICANS
7. MANASSEH..............CUBANS
8. GAD.........................AMERICAN INDIANS
9. REUBEN...................SEMINOLE INDIAN
10. NAPHTALI...............ARGENTINA
11. ASHER.....................COLUMBIA TO URUGUAY
12. ISSACHER...............MEXICANS

The Bible teaches a soteriology -- a means of uniting with God. God tells us that we can unite with him by being pardoned of divine destructive punishment ("justified"), as we believe ("faith") that Christ was punished in our place on the cross ("atonement"). This is the Biblical Christian soteriology: "justification by faith." Other religions have different soteriologies:
Platonism. For example, in Platonism, it is taught that God punishes humans only to correct them and not to destroy them -- kind of like a gardener pruning a tree, or a surgeon cauterizing a patient, or a sculptor chiseling a stone. Thus, Plato taught that we unite with God by yielding ourselves to the operation of his ongoing wrath and cooperating synergistically to be transfigured by it. This soteriology is made clear in Socrates's dialogue with Polus in Plato's book, "Gorgias."
Islam. In Islam, it is taught that a person can escape Allah's non-corrective punishments ("justification") by believing in Allah and Muhammed's Quranic prophecy ("faith") and by not failing to live according to the Five Pillars.
Many Non-Christians resist converting to Christianity because they believe that God taught them the soteriology they believe. For example, both Plato and Muhammed believed that God was teaching them their soteriologies. But even if it is true that God taught one of the non-Christian soteriologies, this is still not a good excuse for resisting converting to Christianity. Why not? Because Yahweh tells us that he would lie to humans in order to deceive them into believing a non-Christian soteriology. Having believed the false soteriology he taught them, he would condemn them for their violation of his law:
2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 (New International Version)
They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.

Thus the fact that you believe God taught you your religion is not grounds for following it rather than converting to Christianity. For, even if you are correct that God taught your religion to you, it is nevertheless false. Only by the Christian soteriology can you unite with God.

Recently I tried to convince an atheist of intelligent design. I explained to him how unlikely the probability of life simply developing and evolving in human beings was, and how it is much more rational to assume that an intelligent agent was at work. I explained to him how when we come upon an ancient ruin, our first thought is not "oh this must have resulted from natural causes," but rather "these ruins must have been built!"

I then explained how astronomically more complex life is. At the end of the debate he simply shrugged his shoulders and said, "Well maybe God created the universe, or maybe there's an infinite number of universes and the universe we live in is the only one we could live in, and it's the way it is because out of the infinite number of universes it was bound to happen. I guess we'll never know."

I think this was a very powerful lesson. The truth is that people will believe whatever they want to believe. As Socrates once famously said, "The only thing I know is that I don't know anything." If someone wants to believe something, then they'll find a way to justify their belief. If we could rationally convince people of the existence of God, then He wouldn't be God but rather a man-made idea. God is beyond our mere rationality.

If we could deduce God logically, then there would be no need for faith. People believe what they believe not because it is rationally and logically true beyond a doubt, but because it is useful and convenient. Instead of trying to convince people that we're right, we should just develop our own young earth Biology and Physics that is just as useful as the current old earth Biology and Physics. We can teach both models, since both models are equally effective at making accurate predictions, and let people decide what they want to believe. I think this would be the best approach we can take.

A recent email from a friend: "Sue, I'm seeing more and more 'evangelical' churches come out in support of gay marriage. Also, Christian friends are changing their views on the validity of the LGBT lifestyle being acceptable for a Christ-follower. I start worrying that I'm missing something, and even start questioning my beliefs."

No, my dear friend, you are not missing something, but it is a good time to question (not doubt) your beliefs so you can be more convinced than ever that the Creator God has not changed and neither has His word.

I think there are two big reasons so many confessing believers in Christ have allowed themselves to be more shaped by the culture than by the truth of God's word, drifting into spiritual compromise and even into apostasy (abandoning the truth of one's faith). This is not a new problem; the apostle Paul urged his readers in Rome, "Don't let the world around you squeeze you into its own mold, but let God re-mold your minds from within. . ." (Romans 12:2, Phillips).

Reason One: Rejecting the Authority of God's Word

The bitter fruit of several decades of shallow preaching, teaching and discipleship is that many believers have been especially vulnerable to Satan's deceptive question to Eve in the Garden of Eden: "Did God really say . . .?" When Christians ignore or flat-out reject the unmistakably clear biblical statements condemning homosexual relationships, they are playing into the enemy's temptation to justify disobedience by making feelings and perceptions more important than God's design and standards.

There are now two streams of thought on same-sex relationships and behavior, the Traditional View and the Revisionist View. The Revisionist View basically says, "It doesn't matter what the Bible actually says, it doesn't mean what 2000 years of church history has said it means, it means what we want it to say."

People are redefining the Bible, gender and marriage according to what will let them do what they want, when they should (in my opinion) be asking the insightful question posed by Paul Mooris in Shadow of Sodom, "[A]m I trying to interpret Scripture in the light of my proclivity, or should I interpret my proclivity in the light of Scripture?"

The Bible:
Traditional View
The Bible is inspired by a Holy God and is inherently true and trustworthy. The Bible is written by men, but divinely inspired by the Holy Spirit and is sealed by a God of truth and authority.
Revisionist View
The scriptures which traditional Christianity understands to condemn homosexuality [such as Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13; Romans 1:26-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:9-10] have either been mistranslated, yanked out of context or were only appropriate to the culture of that time. Therefore, we no longer have to follow passages we don't like.

Sexuality:
Traditional View
Sexuality and sex are God's good gifts to men and women. While sexuality is an essential attribute of human nature, our Creator did not intend it to be the defining characteristic of humanity.
Revisionist View
Sexuality—the feelings and attractions one feels for other people—is God ordained, diverse, deeply personal and morally permissible. One's sexual orientation, whatever it is, should be celebrated as one of God's good gifts.

Gender:
Traditional View
God created both male and female in His image, and each gender reflects different aspects of the imago Dei. God's sovereign choice of gender for every person reflects His intention for that person's identity; it is one of the ways in which he or she glorifies Him as Creator.
Revisionist View
We are free to make a distinction between sex and gender. Sex is biological maleness or femaleness at birth, and gender is how one feels about their "true" maleness or femaleness internally. Based on Galatians 3:28, "there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."

Marriage:
Traditional View
Marriage is God-ordained between one man and one woman in a lifelong, monogamous, covenantal relationship. The Bible begins with the marriage of Adam and Eve, and ends with the marriage of the Lamb (Jesus) and the Bride (the church). The complementarity of husband and wife express God's intention of both genders in marriage.
Revisionist View
Homosexual behavior is appropriate within the confines of a committed, loving, monogamous, lifelong, Christ-centered relationship.

Both individual Christians and churches have drifted into endorsing same-sex relationships because it always feels better to follow one's flesh than to follow Jesus' call to "deny yourself, take up your cross and follow Me" (Matt. 16:24).

Reason Two: Snagged by the Gay Agenda

In addition to those several decades of shallow preaching, teaching and discipleship I mentioned earlier, many believers have not been submitting themselves to the truth of the Word of God. By default, then, they were easily shaped and swayed by the six points of a brilliantly designed "Gay Manifesto" spelled out in a book called After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s. Originally published as an essay called "The Overhauling of Straight America" that was published in a gay magazine, the authors laid out this plan which has been executed perfectly in the United States. (The quotes below are from the essay, found here)

1. Desensitization and normalization of homosexuals in mainstream America. Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and often as possible.

"The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances.

"In the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the masses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. Instead, the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the camel get his nose inside the tent—only later his unsightly derriere!"

2. Portray members of the LGBTQ community as victims. Indoctrinate mainstream America that members of the LGBTQ community were "born this way."

"In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector."

"Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth communicating. First, the mainstream should be told that gays are victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their sexual preference. The message must read: 'As far as gays can tell, they were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black or bright or athletic. Nobody ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a choice, and are not morally blameworthy. What they do isn't willfully contrary - it's only natural for them. This twist of fate could as easily have happened to you!'"

3. Give protectors a just cause: anti-discrimination

"Our campaign should not demand direct support for homosexual practices, should instead take anti-discrimination as its theme."

4. The use of TV, music, film and social media to desensitize mainstream Americans to their plight as gay people

Over the past 25 years, gay characters, on TV especially, have captured the hearts of American viewers because they were attractive, funny, smart—the kind of characters viewers would like to be. No one was shown the dark underside of gay bars and bathhouses, or same-sex domestic violence, or having to get one's HIV+ status checked.

5. Portray gays and lesbians as pillars in society. Make gays look good.

"From Socrates to Shakespeare, from Alexander the Great to Alexander Hamilton, from Michelangelo to Walt Whitman, from Sappho to Gertrude Stein, the list is old hat to us but shocking news to heterosexual America. In no time, a skillful and clever media campaign could have the gay community looking like the veritable fairy godmother to Western Civilization."

Use celebrities and celebrity endorsement. And who doesn't love Ellen DeGeneres?

6. Once homosexuals have begun to gain acceptance, anti-gay opponents must be vilified, causing them to be viewed as repulsive outcasts of society.

"Our goal is here is twofold. First, we seek to replace the mainstream's self-righteous pride about its homophobia with shame and guilt. Second, we intend to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types.

"The public should be shown images of ranting homophobes whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust middle America. These images might include: the Ku Klux Klan demanding that gays be burned alive or castrated; bigoted southern ministers drooling with hysterical hatred to a degree that looks both comical and deranged; menacing punks, thugs, and convicts speaking coolly about the 'fags' they have killed or would like to kill; a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed."

This is how I see how we got to this place where so many people have been deceived. They didn't anchor themselves to the Truth of the Word of God, and they opened themselves to the cultural brine of Kirk and Madsen's plan to overhaul straight America.

And it worked.

I will close with three personal observations about this situation:

Christians have bought into the culture's worship of feelings over God's unchanging revelation
People love how being a protector of the underdog makes them feel
Not enough of us Christ-followers are living lives that demonstrate the beauty and satisfaction of abiding in Christ
To my sweet friend who asked the question, let me say: God's good gift of sex and the intimacy of the marriage relationship is still intended ONLY for one man and one woman for life. In the beginning, one (Adam) became two (when God formed Eve from Adam), and then the two became one again. That is a deep mystery that makes all variations and deviations on God's intention wrong.

I am indebted to Hope Harris for her insight and analysis of this question.

There has been much talk in the news recently about a famous Penn State college football coach who has been accused of sexually abusing several young boys. The coach has maintained his innocence, but admits to foolishly showering NAKED with several young boys. This case alone shows what's wrong with public nakedness. One thing often leads to another and public nudity is asking for trouble. Americans are deceived to think that males and females can walk around immodestly dressed without consequences.

The Bible teaches that it's best to stay as far away from sin as possible, which is why Jesus equated lust with adultery (Matthew 5:28). James 1:14-16 plainly teach what is wrong with public nakedness, for it is the root cause of sexual immorality...

James 1:14-16, “But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death. Do not err, my beloved brethren.”

It all begins with lust. If you aren't in the presence of other naked people, then you cannot be drawn away by lust. it's not rocket-science!

It is unscriptural for men to shower naked around other men, let alone in the presence of young boys. This Scripture passage makes this clear. It is not good for men to see each other naked, as evidenced by the pederast homosexual problem. The Romans were infamous for pederasts (men having sex with boys). Socrates, the famous Greek philosopher, was a pederast homosexual.

There is nothing manly about men disrespecting one another by walking around naked in the shower room. It is proper and right for men to show respect for the body, and toward their fellow mankind, by clothing the body. It is more than coincidence that initiates into Luciferian occult groups are required to perform acts of homosexuality as part of their initiation rights. The purpose for this is to debase each other, removing all bastions of decency and reservation between one another. In all sexual relations, even if with a prostitute for a few minutes, a soul-tie is formed between the two people (whether male or female) involved in the act. This is one of the spiritual dangers of sexual immorality, which undermines one's entire soul's health. Proverb 6:32, “But whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he that doeth it destroyeth his own soul.”

I heard an internet radio commercial today advertising the product, “AGELESS MALE,” guaranteed to boost testosterone for men by 61%. Then the advertiser said, “Get back in the game!” That's not why I wrote this article, but the timing was perfect for this article, because it evidences the sinful and irresponsible attitude of society today toward sexual relations. Get back in the game??? Sadly, sex is a game to many people!!! This is the horrible consequence of America's sexually-indecent television programming, promiscuous sitcoms, perverted Late Night comedy shows and TV in general.

I don't watch TV because it is too evil. So when I do occasionally see a TV show on someone else's TV in a hotel or at a restaurant, I am absolutely shocked and angered by what I see and hear. If you watch TV all-the-time, you won't see just how evil it is, because you are sinking into the abyss of wickedness with the hellivision. I guarantee you that if you turn off your television for 6-months that you'll be absolutely shell-shocked when you turn it back on. I hate TV!

It is common practice in health clubs, YMCA's and locker-rooms across America for men to shower naked in the presence of other men, and to walk around naked and let it all hang out. It is uncouth, tasteless, lacking of respect for each other and unscriptural. The same is true of women's locker-rooms. Historically, sports and public nudity have always been synonymous. The Greeks were famous for sports and infamous for nudity.

Genesis 9:21-27 teach us several important life-changing and moral lessons. We see that alcoholic beverages are spiritually dangerous, linked to nakedness and sin. Noah sinned by getting drunk and led his son to sin by doing so. Don't think that Noah didn't think about that either. Noah had to live with the division created between him and his son because of booze. Alcohol brought shame upon Noah. Noah had to live from that day forward knowing that Ham saw him naked and drunk. Although Noah knew he was forgiven in Christ, he caused permanent division between he and his son, Ham.

We also see that Ham sinfully paraded his father's sins, instead of faithfully concealing the matter. America's history books, Wikipedia and newspapers are filled with what husbands and wives have hypocritically said about each other during and after a divorce. The next time you hear a woman talking about how evil her husband is ask her how she obtained perfection. The Bible warns against condemning anyone. James 4:12, “There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?”

By the way, I hate Wikipedia. I've noticed that celebrity profiles (like George Clooney) are locked, but gospel preacher's profiles are open for every snake, rat and God-hating trash to slander and serve roast preacher. Wikipedia is a sewer of American society and Jimmy Wales will give account to God for helping spread malicious gossip. Wikipedia is a weapon. It's easy for some worm who never built a hot-dog stand to throw rocks at a faithful preacher who gave his life to others in the Lord for 50-years, helping literally millions of people in so many ways and changing a nation for God.

[...]

The Demon-Possessed Maniac of Gadarenes

Luke 8:27 and 35, “And when he went forth to land, there met him out of the city a certain man, which had devils long time, and ware no clothes, neither abode in any house, but in the tombs... Then they went out to see what was done; and came to Jesus, and found the man, out of whom the devils were departed, sitting at the feet of Jesus, clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid.”

What a precious passage of Scripture! This afflicted man was possessed by devils, running around naked and living in the wild. The entire city knew he was insane. Yet the Bible says when he found Jesus, he came into his right mind and put his clothes back on. Amen! Jesus is the cure for insanity and nudity.

Millions of Americans go to psychologists, psychiatrists and religious leaders for help; but the Word of God says the afflicted man at Gadarenes came into his RIGHT MIND when he found Jesus. It is interesting that being in one's “right mind” is associated with being properly clothed. Americans have a problem keeping their clothes on because they AREN'T in their right minds, they are mentally-ill. This is clearly evidenced by the fact that nearly half of the women in America have murdered a child by abortion. Only a mentally-ill person would deliberately kill a precious child. So it doesn't surprise me in a rotten society that devours it's own children that they would also have a problem with nudity.

The Cure for Nudity is Jesus!

Women who love and respect the Lord won't wear bikinis at the beach, or wear miniskirts, or wear pants, or pose in Playboy. There's not an honest normal man alive who doesn't know what's wrong with women wearing pants—they are extremely revealing of a woman's flesh.

We are living in evil times, when unrepentant sinners are trying to justify every sin imaginable with the Bible. I heard a woman on the news, a professional pornographic model, claim that God approved of her vile career. She said that God created Adam and Eve naked, so nudity must be ok. Evidently she's never read Genesis 3:7 or 1st Timothy 2:9.

Here's a Scripture for all you women who keep trying to justify your nudity and immodest clothing ... “Ye have wearied the LORD with your words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the LORD, and he delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment?” (Malachi 2:17). Beyonce Knowles claims to be a devout Christian; yet says she has permission from God to wear sexy clothes and strip on stage. She is woefully wrong! Beyonce needs to see Jesus.

God knows what we watch on TV. It's just as bad to watch adultery on TV as it would be for us to be in same room with them. The TV has a desensitizing effect on its viewers. Sin is not shocking anymore but rather becomes commonplace (no big deal). This is why many people have become lackadaisical and acceptant of the wicked sin of homosexuality. The following reads like a synopsis of hellivision and unholy-wood:

Romans 1:28-32 -"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:"

Re: Why are women so fucking dumb

That's what happens when your life is too easy. Women can simply afford to be dumb as bricks and believe in made up shit.

high iq. girls in the countryside do not have the time to believe in anything beyond what their priest tells them.

t. someone who knows girls in the countryside.

I also want to add the other reasons: Femaleness has become irrelevant in modern society, which is dominated by science, logic, understanding and so on. I know this sounds cliched, but in the countryside or in pre-modern times, intuition, knowledge passed from generation to generation and the like was much more important. Women had a confidence and consciousness because they passed on knowledge about sewing, washing, arts and crafts from mother to daughter, knowledge that men were excluded from accessing due to gender roles. They, in effect, used to feel unconsciously less inferior compared to men, and didn't have much of a need for feminism.

Today, when all of these female specific jobs are taken over by factories and scientific accuracy, there is nothing female that is important anymore, there is no knowledge or understanding that is exclusive to women anymore, there is no sphere where women clearly no more than women. I can cite a passage from Plato's Republic where Socrates is asking Glaucon: Aren't there professions where women are clearly more knowledgeable than any man? And he affirms. Think about how this has changed! What's still female is nowadays at the most "emotional labour", i.e. making people feel good about themselves and providing good feelings, as nurses, teachers and the like. But this isn't a "power" and it cannot be conceptualized as such outside of spiritual means.

Women are compensating this loss of esoteric female knowledge with the dark crafts, astrology and spirituality, because it seems to be a way to access knowledge that male rationality and science can not access, you cannot explain it in scientific terms so men are excluded from it. This is precisely why witchcraft is so huge and has this feminist connotation: They think it's a way to access female-only powers that men cannot have, and they gain a self-confidence and consciousness as powerful beings that matter in more ways than being Chad's cocksleeve.

It's female cope.

One of the stupidest games atheists play is pretending that God can be proven or unproven by human logic. How ridiculous is it to take creatures who know as little about their own world as we do and set them up as all-wise? The assumption that all reality can be revealed through logical musings is in itself utterly illogical. The history books are filled with humans making absurd assumptions about their own anatomy, the world, and the universe because they thought their logical arguments were the epitome of proof. Well, suppose your mother starts coughing up blood, wheezing, complaining of chest pains, and losing a lot of weight. We could form a very logical argument that she has advanced lung cancer, because these are the symptoms of it. If human reasoning is the ultimate proof of reality, then we should start pumping her full of chemo and surgically removing portions of her lungs. Why bother with x-rays and CT scans? Once we’ve built a logical argument, we need no further proof. And yet would you agree to have some doctor slice open your chest simply based on a collection of symptoms? Certainly not, because those symptoms could be caused by many other things as well. In the same way, Christians can weave together impressive arguments for why God must be, or they can stutter and stammer and end up thoroughly stumped by your clever comebacks, but so what? Are you going to let the quality of someone else’s debating skills determine who you pray to? If God is real, do you really think He’s going to let you off the hook because you never found a Christian who could argue as well as you can? Debate and human reasoning have nothing to do with it. God isn’t some theory cooked up by Socrates, He’s a living Being who says that if you keep defying Him, He might suddenly decide that He’s done with your attitude and kill you off. Then you’ll end up in Hell with more proof of God’s existence than you ever wanted and no way to reconcile with Him. Is that your idea of a victory?

The reason we don’t get into long debates with atheists is that we’re simply not invested. Unlike some Christians, we don’t have a burning need to see your soul end up on the right side of eternity. The God we know says He’s perfectly fine with you roasting in Hell. He’s God—we’re not going to criticize His preferences. Since He’s fine with you defying Him your whole life, so are we. We know as well as you do that these little fits you work yourself into are just a game. If you were really serious about finding God, you would seek Him directly. But the truth is that most of you have already met God, and you found Him to be Someone who you heartily disapprove of. Fine. If you want to pretend that God thinks you’re a higher authority than He is, what can we say? Have fun in Hell.