“Hate” Symbols: They’re Baloney for the Rubes
The most evil hate symbol on earth is the hammer-and-sickle (communist/Soviet) symbol. Under that symbol, millions of innocent people were murdered and oppressed.
Yet, that symbol is rarely if ever called a “hate” symbol.
A handful of leftist Jews founded the UN in 1945. Later, NATO sprang from that.
Two Jews — Leo Strauss and Irving Kristol — invented Neoconservatism circa 1973.
It’s not surprising that Jews — a small, aggressive ethnic group — would be the kings of global government since circa 1806, because it’s perfect for them. Jews are wealthy, international, cosmopolitan people who love power and who enjoy manipulating the goyim (the “gentile farm animals”).
Guess what couples in America fight about the most? Right! Money (and also “tone of voice” — women will actually pick a fight over a man’s tone of voice! “Don’t you use that tone with me!”).
The basic problem is that women have brains that are “wired” to prevent them from compartmentalizing. Meaning: women must think emotionally, even about money. They have no choice. That’s not a good thing. Today, “men play second fiddle to the boss lady.”
Hence, [St.] Augustine was able to believe, despite what scripture says, that God created all things instantaneously. Once a person goes that far in his 'interpretations' he might as well join Bishop Spong in that person's assertion that 'the only part of the Apostle's Creed I believe is that Jesus Christ died and was buried'. With Christian 'friends' like that who needs enemies?
How Do You Like Your Human Equality?
Do you like it:
1. Slow (Democracy, aka, “any retard can vote”)?
2. Faster (Socialism)?
3. Real Fast (a Communist Revolution)?
The correct answer, of course, is: “none of the above, because humans are not equal and they never will be.”
I want to begin by repeating what was said in deep meditation by Yeshua bin Joseph who many refer to as Jesus. He said, “God and the multiverse is more vast and diverse than anyone can imagine.” It can only be embraced with humility. We have to be brutally honest with ourselves and not let the ego claim it knows everything. Especially in today’s world where everything is topsy-turvy and everything we have been told is a lie.
The Charlie Kirk assassination is a perfect example. Look for patterns, the same organization behind the assassinations of many leaders of the past bent on world dominance in almost all cases has had a hand in the previous assassinations back to, and before Socrates. Messiahs die young on Earth. The same group is behind the race, religion, cultural and gender divisions perpetuated by politicians and the corporate owned media.
<...>
Q has said Israel will be last. <...> Nothing is or was as it seems. Charlie Kirk demanded his organization decouple from the Kazarian Anastazi Jews. He referred to them as secular Jews who were never Jews by birthright or DNA.
<...>
What they don’t own is the soul, the hearts and minds of free thinking people and their connection to God/Creator/Great Spirit or any other name you want to give it even though it is beyond the names and images of man. What Charlie was activating was Christ consciousness destroying their plan to continue the ungodly social engineering of the kids at Universities. This includes all the way down to kindergarten with their drag queen story hours.
<...>
The Earth will join the rest of the universe in peace, Universal Law will be reinstated. We will take a quantum leap in evolution. The days of tyranny, war, disease and poverty will come to an end. The Beautiful Many Ascended Masters, Saints, sages, including very Spiritually and Technologically Advanced Off-Worlders all work under and in unity with the same force what we call The God/Creator/Great Spirit force within everyone.
The most serious thing about Judeo-Leftism is: it’s becoming more and more extreme as time moves forward. But why? Likely because leftism isn’t “recruiting enough new people into it.” That especially applies to young White men: they aren’t buying leftism anymore. Postmodernism denies science and denies reality itself.
This means that a person who believes we descended from apes or that all life came from a primitive protocell is inventing their own private version of Christianity which in a technical sense is not the Christianity of the Bible. This does not mean that their belief in Jesus Christ will not save them. It simply means that they are compromising with the world and in that sense could be said to not be genuine Christians.
[From “The Idea of “Human Equality” Killed Off the White Race”]
White people are now just 8% of the total world population. That’s a tiny number
The bogus and dangerous idea of “human equality” (aka, egalitarianism) is popular in the White Western world and has been since the end of WWII. (See the UN’s 1948 “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” written by the Jew, Rene Cassin). Who made egalitarianism popular? Hollywood, the media, the schools, the “allied” victors of WWII
Where did the idea of “human equality” come from? Technically speaking, from Jews. From the Bible: the Book of Galatians has a bold passage in it about human equality (see Galatians 3:28) [1]. That passage was written by St. Paul (who was a Jew originally called Saul of Tarsus). Then later, the Judeo-Left began pushing egalitarian ideas circa 1840, namely communism and socialism [2][…]
[1]“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” — Galatians 3:28, in the New Testament Bible
A web quote: “The Apostle Paul wrote the book of Galatians, as stated in Galatians 1:1. He penned this New Testament letter to the churches in the region of Galatia to address a theological crisis caused by teachers insisting that Gentile converts must adhere to the Mosaic Law, particularly circumcision, for salvation”
[2] Modern leftism is based on the idea of human equality. The fact that humans can never be equal doesn’t seem to bother leftists. Hence the slogan: “To Left Is To Lie”
As a result, fascism is a good thing (although I’d rather have a “White republic” instead, as America did circa 1840, but can we go back to that?). Rightist movements are always a reaction to leftism.
Today, leftists wrongly call everything “fascism.”
[…]
Benito Mussolini’s fascism (galvanized in Italy’s Partito Nazionale Fascista [PNF, founded in 1921]) was a response to Bolshevism (communism) in Northern Italy. Back then, communists were taking over privately-owned businesses with guns and knives (see the “Biennio Rosso” [“two red years”; 1919–20]). In his actions, Mussolini had the blessings of wealthy land-owners. In fact, without Mussolini, Italy would have surely gone communist.
“It cannot be denied that Fascism and similar movements aiming at the establishment of dictatorships are full of the best intentions and that their intervention has, for the moment, saved European civilization. The merit that Fascism has thereby won for itself will live on eternally in history.” — Jewish economist Ludwig von Mises, in his 1927 book “Liberalism.” However — like a typical Jew — he warned that fascism should only be temporary, not permanent. Regardless, for a Jew to praise fascism is significant since Jews usually hate and fear fascism.
[From “What Really Happened in Mississippi in 1964”]
This post is about the murders of three “civil rights” workers in Mississippi in June 1964. Mind you, this was just two weeks before the horrible and unconstitutional Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law by the creepy president Lyndon Johnson. Must have been just a…Cohencidence, huh? (Johnson later bragged that that Act he signed into law delivered millions of negro votes to his political party by default. It was all a political stunt, in other words)
“Civil rights” was a widespread, concerted attack on all of the White Western countries in a variety of different ways: forced quota hiring, Brown immigrant importations, special housing laws, homosexual “rights” — all of that stuff and more (England passed the Race Relations Act in 1965)
They (Team Jew/Team Left) managed to fool a lot of White people from 1964-onward into believing that “civil rights” were a good thing[…]If you were White, you lost many of your rights[…]
Trivia: most “civil rights” laws/mandates in America are illegal since they are based on the 14th Amendment and that amendment was not ratified by Congress[…]
The far-Left 1964 “civil rights workers” (two of them were Jews and one was Black — it figures!) were warned several times by patriotic White people in rural Mississippi to “stop meddling in our small towns.” But they didn’t stop. Recall that old saying “FAFO.” Had I lived in Mississippi back then, I likely would have told them: “if you want to transform and socially re-engineer entire regions of America, then go do that to your own region in New York and leave ours alone”
The Whites of Mississippi didn’t want their safe, rural areas to be politically and racially altered by radical Jewish agitators from Up North giving Blacks “the keys to their kingdom.” If you really want negroes in your area voting and holding public office, then you’re a fool. Why would you want low-IQ Africans to vote and hold office?
Now is an excellent time to remind the normal White citizens that the “transgender” movement (which is fake) is entirely a Jewish construct (by ethnicity). Meaning? Had the fake “tranny” movement never existed, Kirk would not have been shot. And how ironic: Kirk was answering a question about trannies when he was shot.
Food for thought.
Not only do wealthy Jews run the “tranny” movement, but, the earliest pioneer of (modern) trannyism was a Jew named Leslie Feinberg. She pioneered the use of “multiple gender-neutral pronouns” (e.g., they/them).
[…]
The man who actually invented the concept of trannyism was also a Jew, Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld (1868-1935). In 1933, the “Nazis” sacked his “sexology research center,” assaulted the staff, and removed all the books, which were later burned.
Feinberg’s pamphlet “Transgender Liberation: A Movement Whose Time Has Come” (1992) was pre-internet and it “re-birthed” the tranny movement. Another, later, Jewish pioneer of the sex-change movement was Stanley H. Biber, who died in Colorado in 2006. As you can see, ethnic Jews have “a thing” about kinky sexual movements.
A web quote: “Feinberg was the first theorist to advance a Marxist concept of “transgender liberation”…
White people are now just 8% of the total world population. That’s a tiny number.
The bogus and dangerous idea of “human equality” (aka, egalitarianism) is popular in the White Western world and has been since the end of WWII. (See the UN’s 1948 “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” written by the Jew, Rene Cassin). Who made egalitarianism popular? Hollywood, the media, the schools, the “allied” victors of WWII.
Where did the idea of “human equality” come from? Technically speaking, from Jews. From the Bible: the Book of Galatians has a bold passage in it about human equality (see Galatians 3:28). That passage was written by St. Paul (who was a Jew originally called Saul of Tarsus). Then later, the Judeo-Left began pushing egalitarian ideas circa 1840, namely communism and socialism.
[…]
Modern leftism is based on the idea of human equality. The fact that humans can never be equal doesn’t seem to bother leftists. Hence the slogan: “To Left Is To Lie”
First, we had “trans people” and now, we have “trans art.” But how can “trans art” exist if “trans people” don’t exist? A tranny is merely someone who is mentally ill (i.e., has “gender dysphoria”) and who likely has autism (i.e., severe obsessions/fixations): 80% of trannies have autism, although the numbers are fudged to hide that fact. Also, the tranny movement is heavily Jewish by ethnicity, with wealthy Jews funding most of it since Team Jew hates and fears the normal White “nuclear family” and wants to wreck it as fast as possible, and Team Jew has done a good job of that so far! Look at Second-Wave feminism and “no-fault divorce laws.”
[…]
An AI quote: “In the context of transgender, ‘trans’ indicates that a person’s gender identity is different from the sex they were assigned at birth.” This is the biggest bunch of crap ever shitted. A person isn’t “assigned” his sex. He automatically has a sex when he pops out of mom. The tranny horseshit must end. Because teaching children that “trannies” are legit is child abuse since they don’t exist. A man cannot become a woman. Duh.
[Context: Referring to an Architectural Digest post about Daniel Libeskind]
When I first saw this triangle-looking….thing, I knew instantly that a Jew made it. And I was right.
This, they say, is “a style of postmodern architecture characterized by fragmentation and distortion.” Ah, postmodern! That explains a lot.
[…]
A top Frankfurt School jerk-off, the communist Theodor Adorno (a half-Jew) had an interesting cultural theory, highlighted in his book Negative Dialectics (1966). It basically goes like this:
Traditional, old White things are, by default, “oppressive and threatening.” How? Because they are White, well-built, beautiful, functional and wholesome. As such, those things make substandard things made by Blacks, Browns, or leftists (e.g., art, architecture, music) seem ugly and amateurish by comparison. Since White things are superior, the other things seem inferior. So, modern art and architecture must be “celebrated” since they are “weapons” against the old ways: the antique, stuffy, White culture. So all “new” things must be celebrated and championed, and all “old” things must be rejected and torn down (China’s leader Chairman Mao had the same attitude, which led to his murderous Cultural Revolution in 1966).
Too Many Trannies Are Shooting Kids…
So, the “solution” offered to solve that problem is to….ban defenseless steel objects known as “guns”. Make sense? Nope.
Question: why were there very few mass shootings in 1963, yet, today there are lots of mass shootings, and furthermore, guns were more available in 1963 than now (you could even buy them by mail order until 1968)? Why is that? Obviously, guns are not the problem. The problem is that people today are more defective than they were in 1963. Also, women today take lots of psychological prescription drugs compared to 1963, so that’s also a factor which leads to defective children.
Trivia: ethnic Jews have led (yes, led) the movement to ban guns in America. That’s why we call it “goy control.”
[It's Over] Fasting to death is better than roping or blowing your brains out.
Go back hundreds of thousands of years, when every femoid reproduced and only one out of seventeen men reproduced, when sixteen out of seventeen men either spent their lives hunting and gathering to feed cave chad, his harem, and his offspring while being bullied, intimidated, and killed in the heartless bloodbath of sexual competition and the only other option was to wander the earth alone until you die... These cavecels didn't have ropes, you could eat some poison berries or poison plant, you could force a venomous snake to bite you, maybe a few were smart enough to slash their wrists with obsidian but I doubt it, and if you knew where a high cliff was there was that option.
So how does a non chad man perform the art of suicide where there is no high cliffs? How does he set himself free if he lacks the knowledge of rope making or poison plants? What if he's not smart enough to slash his wrist? How do animals perform suicide? I remember when my dog was terminally ill and it knew that there was no pint in suffering a meaningless existence, it stopped eating and hid in under a table with it's face in the corner. We had to take it to the vet and shoot it up with the pink juice. Animals know that starvation can kill them. Starvation must therefore be, the primordial incel suicide method. It requires nothing, you don't need anything to do it.
If you choose to die by starvation alone, without dehydrating yourself, it can be painless and euphoric... it just takes awhile... If you start with less than ten percent body fat, you end it in a month. In India it's ritualized and often involves a slow gradual reduction of food over a period of several months to several years until they choose to stop eating completely and barely drink water, some abandoning water when they feel death is near to hasten the process.
In Hinduism this is called Prayopavesa:
image(From Wikipedia)
Prayopavesa (Sanskrit: प्रायोपवेशनम्, literally resolving to die through fasting) is a practice in Hinduism that denotes the suicide by fasting of a person, who has no desire or ambition left, and no responsibilities remaining in life . Committing Prayopavesa is bound by very strict regulations. Only a person who has no desire or ambition left, and no responsibilities remaining in life is entitled to perform it . The decision to do so must be publicly declared well in advance. Ancient lawmakers stipulated the conditions that allow Prayopavesa. They are one's inability to perform normal bodily purification, death appears imminent or the condition is so bad that life's pleasures are nil and the action is done under community regulation.
As you can see, prayopavesa is taking LDAR to the extreme, it is the ultimate LDAR. Fuck community regulation, everyone is bluepilled and cucked in current times.
In Jainism it is called Sallekhana:
image(From Wikipedia)
Sallekhana , also known as samlehna, santhara, samadhi-marana or sanyasana-marana, is a supplementary vow to the ethical code of conduct of Jainism. It is the religious practice of voluntarily fasting to death by gradually reducing the intake of food and liquids. It is viewed in Jainism as the thinning of human passions and the body, and another means of destroying rebirth-influencing karma by withdrawing all physical and mental activities. It is not considered as a suicide by Jain scholars because it is not an act of passion, nor does it deploy poisons or weapons. After the sallekhana vow, the ritual preparation and practice can extend into years.
Sallekhana (Sanskrit: Sallikhita) means to properly 'thin out', 'scour out' or 'slender' the passions and the body through gradually abstaining from food and drink. Sallekhana is divided into two components: Kashaya Sallekhana (slenderising of passions) or Abhayantra Sallekhana (internal slendering) and Kaya Sallekhana (slenderising the body) or Bahya Sallekhana(external slendering). According to Jain texts, Sallekhana leads to Ahimsa (non-violence or non-injury), as a person observing Sallekhana subjugates the passions, which are the root cause of Himsa (injury or violence).
It's also practiced in Buddhism as well:
image(2nd century B.C.E statue of a Neckbeard Buddha embracing death by LDAR)
image(Look at this chad with his shades on...)
(From Wikipedia)
Sokushinbutsu (即身仏) are a kind of Buddhist mummy. The term refers to the practice of Buddhist monks observing asceticism to the point of death and entering mummification while alive.[1]They are seen in a number of Buddhist countries, but the Japanese term "sokushinbutsu" is generally used. It is believed that many hundreds of monks tried, but only 24 such mummifications have been discovered to date. There is a common suggestion that Shingon school founder Kukai brought this practice from Tang China as part of secret tantric practices he learned, and that were later lost in China. According to Paul Williams, the Sokushinbutsu ascetic practices of Shugendō were likely inspired by Kūkai – the founder of Shingon Buddhism, who ended his life by reducing and then stopping intake of food and water, while continuing to meditate and chant Buddhist mantras. Ascetic self-mummification practices are also recorded in China, but are associated with the Ch'an(Zen Buddhism) tradition there.
In medieval Japan, this tradition developed a process for Sokushinbutsu, which a monk completed over about 3,000 days to ten years. It involved a strict diet called mokujikigyo (literally, "eating a tree"). The diet abstained from any cereals, and relied on pine needles, resins and seeds found in the mountains, which would eliminate all fat in the body. Increasing rates of fasting and meditation would lead to starvation. The monks would slowly reduce then stop liquid intake, thus dehydrating the body and shrinking all organs. The monks would die in a state of jhana (meditation) while chanting the nenbutsu (a mantra about Buddha), and their body would become naturally preserved as a mummy with skin and teeth intact without decay and without the need of any artificial preservatives.
It was discussed by Hegesias of Cyrene:
image(From Wikipedia)
Hegesias (Greek: Ἡγησίας; fl. 290 BC) of Cyrene was a Cyrenaic philosopher, the Cyrenaics forming one of the earliest Socratic schools of philosophy. He argued that happiness is impossible to achieve, and that the goal of life was the avoidance of pain and sorrow. Conventional values such as wealth, poverty, freedom, and slavery are all indifferent and produce no more pleasure than pain. Cicero claims that Hegesias wrote a book called Death by Starvation, which persuaded so many people that death is more desirable than life that Hegesias was banned from teaching in Alexandria. It has been thought by some that Hegesias was influenced by Buddhist teachings.
Hegesias followed Aristippus in considering pleasure as the goal of life; but, the view which he took of human life was more pessimistic. Happiness, he said, could not be the goal of life, because it is not attainable, and therefore concluded that the wise person's only goal should be to become free from pain and sorrow. Since, too, every person is self-sufficient, all external goods were rejected as not being true sources of pleasure.
Complete happiness cannot possibly exist; for that the body is full of many sensations, and that the mind sympathizes with the body, and is troubled when that is troubled, and also that fortune prevents many things which we cherished in anticipation; so that for all these reasons, perfect happiness eludes our grasp. Moreover, that both life and death are desirable. They also say that there is nothing naturally pleasant or unpleasant, but that owing to want, or rarity, or satiety, some people are pleased and some vexed; and that wealth and poverty have no influence at all on pleasure, for that rich people are not affected by pleasure in a different manner from poor people. In the same way they say that slavery and freedom are things indifferent, if measured by the standard of pleasure, and nobility and baseness of birth, and glory and infamy. They add that, for the foolish person it is expedient to live, but to the wise person it is a matter of indifference; and that the wise person will do everything for his own sake; for that he will not consider any one else of equal importance with himself; and he will see that if he were to obtain ever such great advantages from any one else, they would not be equal to what he could himself bestow.
Hence the sage ought to regard nothing but himself; action is quite indifferent; and if action, so also is life, which, therefore, is in no way more desirable than death.
The wise person would not be so much absorbed in the pursuit of what is good, as in the attempt to avoid what is bad, considering the chief good to be living free from all trouble and pain: and that this end was attained best by those who looked upon the efficient causes of pleasure as indifferent.
None of this, however, is as strong as the testimony of Cicero, who claims that Hegesias wrote a book called Death by Starvation (Greek: ἀποκαρτερῶν), in which a man who has resolved to starve himself is introduced as representing to his friends that death is actually more to be desired than life, and that the gloomy descriptions of human misery which this work contained were so overpowering that they inspired many people to kill themselves, in consequence of which the author received the surname of Death-persuader (Peisithanatos). This book was published at Alexandria, where he was, in consequence, forbidden to teach by king Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-246 BC).
imageSeriously, I can't think of a more badass way to go. All these dudes in ancient times were black pilled as fuck.
image
The Jewsmedia has been lying to the public for decades. Now, they say “transgender” people when there’s no such thing as transgender people. Humans cannot change their “gender.” A man cannot become a woman. It’s physically impossible and the media knows it. But the Jewish media bosses insist on pushing “the transgender narrative” because they hate normal White people and they want to destroy the White race. It’s that simple. White people are “a threat” to Team Jew. Ask any honest rabbi (if you can find one! Good luck with that!).
Jews are not genetically White. They are half-Arab “mongrels” (meaning that their DNA is unusual)
[Socrates]
White people invent & forget.
Yellow people copy & remember.
Black people do neither.
[Jürgen]
Even worse: Black people DESTROY.
Go look at the wonderful condition of that basketball hoop
Whitey gave the nigger for his playground in the ghetto.
[Tim McGreen]
White people invent & forget.
Yellow people copy & remember.
Black people do neither.
Jewish people make all the money yet they still whine.
[Franklin Ryckaert]
Right,but why do you call them Jewish PEOPLE?
[CW-2]
Another old saying:
A White man finds a spring of water in a desert and builds an oasis; the Yellow man finds an oasis and carefully maintains it; the Black man finds an oasis and turns it back into a desert.
The jew cannot destroy by himself, he needs willing White traitors and Black/Brown foot soldiers.
[Mari]
Here’s a good one!
Give a White a hammer he will build a house and invent some new techniques.
Give a yellow a hammer and he will make millions of them and go on making them until a White tells him to make something else.
Give a brown a hammer and he will use it to beat his wife.
Give a black a hammer and he will use it to kill a White.
Give a jew a hammer and he will give it to a black.
[Dave]
Or… Give a white a hammer and hell hire a brown to use it.
Give a yellow a hammer and hell hire a brown to use it.
Give a brown a hammer and Hell use it to break into your car.
Give a black a hammer and hell try to rape it!
Give a jew a hammer and hell turn it into a multi million dollar scheme…
‘oy vey,dis vas da hammer dat vas used by the evil (insert current made up nazi here) who single handedly killed 666,666 jews with it. Oh g-d de atrocity,de humanity!!!
[Paul Kersey]
Black people??? Those two words are contradictory.
Big surprise.
The legal system in America is way too loose. Powerful Jews can file a flurry of ridiculous lawsuits against “the Right” and nobody can stop them unless they have really deep pockets.
Lawfare (i.e., using the law in various ways to attack political opponents) is a Jewish thing, and is run by about 50 powerful Jews. Alex Linder himself was the victim of lawfare: they canceled his bank account without notice and when he tried to find out why, the bank would not explain why. But of course we can guess why.
Since law is “the Jewish ‘house specialty,'” it’s not hard to understand why Team Jew would use it to go after political opponents.
Another, similar list of “powerful Jews controlling the Left” is here:
https://counter-currents.com/2021/05/scott-howards-the-transgender-industrial-complex/ (Of course, today it’s not just “the Left.” Jews also control the Right, too).
[Context: He’s referring to this Vox post.]
As If the Left Is Legit! As If!
This article reminded me of Alex. He did an internship with the American Spectator magazine circa 1993. That was before he became a White nationalist.
Anyway, here’s the thing: Leftism is treated as “on par with” Rightism. But that’s a very big laugh. Very big. Because leftism (a poisonous Jewish construct from 1840-onward) amounts to only this: “Tear down anything White and normal.” That’s it! Just ask the Jew (half-Jew) Theodor Adorno. Well, you can’t ask him since he died in 1969. But you might be able to channel him from the great beyond! “Calling Adorno, come in, Adorno…”
...most evolutionists are too intellectually lazy and dishonest to represent their opponents correctly...
You didn't expect me to be 'sexist' and reply in a different manner to your silly attack because you're female (and likely blonde) did you? And under your evolutionary system, why not be sexist? Darwin and most of his evolutionary contemporaries were very sexist. Conversely, the Biblical Christianity is the only philosophy that has provided true liberation for women, but you come here to attack it.
One day an anti-creationist might surprise us all and actual respond to an actual argument instead of a straw man.
It is unscriptural for men to shower naked around other men, let alone in the presence of young boys. This Scripture passage makes this clear. It is not good for men to see each other naked, as evidenced by the pederast homosexual problem. The Romans were infamous for pederasts (men having sex with boys). Socrates, the famous Greek philosopher, was a pederast homosexual.
There is nothing manly about men disrespecting one another by walking around naked in the shower room. It is proper and right for men to show respect for the body, and toward their fellow mankind, by clothing the body. It is more than coincidence that initiates into Luciferian occult groups are required to perform acts of homosexuality as part of their initiation rights. The purpose for this is to debase each other, removing all bastions of decency and reservation between one another. In all sexual relations, even if with a prostitute for a few minutes, a soul-tie is formed between the two people (whether male or female) involved in the act. This is one of the spiritual dangers of sexual immorality, which undermines one's entire soul's health. Proverb 6:32, “But whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he that doeth it destroyeth his own soul.”
I heard an internet radio commercial today advertising the product, “AGELESS MALE,” guaranteed to boost testosterone for men by 61%. Then the advertiser said, “Get back in the game!” That's not why I wrote this article, but the timing was perfect for this article, because it evidences the sinful and irresponsible attitude of society today toward sexual relations. Get back in the game??? Sadly, sex is a game to many people!!! This is the horrible consequence of America's sexually-indecent television programming, promiscuous sitcoms, perverted Late Night comedy shows and TV in general.
I don't watch TV because it is too evil. So when I do occasionally see a TV show on someone else's TV in a hotel or at a restaurant, I am absolutely shocked and angered by what I see and hear. If you watch TV all-the-time, you won't see just how evil it is, because you are sinking into the abyss of wickedness with the hellivision. I guarantee you that if you turn off your television for 6-months that you'll be absolutely shell-shocked when you turn it back on. I hate TV!
It is common practice in health clubs, YMCA's and locker-rooms across America for men to shower naked in the presence of other men, and to walk around naked and let it all hang out. It is uncouth, tasteless, lacking of respect for each other and unscriptural. The same is true of women's locker-rooms. Historically, sports and public nudity have always been synonymous. The Greeks were famous for sports and infamous for nudity.
Genesis 9:21-27 teach us several important life-changing and moral lessons. We see that alcoholic beverages are spiritually dangerous, linked to nakedness and sin. Noah sinned by getting drunk and led his son to sin by doing so. Don't think that Noah didn't think about that either. Noah had to live with the division created between him and his son because of booze. Alcohol brought shame upon Noah. Noah had to live from that day forward knowing that Ham saw him naked and drunk. Although Noah knew he was forgiven in Christ, he caused permanent division between he and his son, Ham.
We also see that Ham sinfully paraded his father's sins, instead of faithfully concealing the matter. America's history books, Wikipedia and newspapers are filled with what husbands and wives have hypocritically said about each other during and after a divorce. The next time you hear a woman talking about how evil her husband is ask her how she obtained perfection. The Bible warns against condemning anyone. James 4:12, “There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?”
By the way, I hate Wikipedia. I've noticed that celebrity profiles (like George Clooney) are locked, but gospel preacher's profiles are open for every snake, rat and God-hating trash to slander and serve roast preacher. Wikipedia is a sewer of American society and Jimmy Wales will give account to God for helping spread malicious gossip. Wikipedia is a weapon. It's easy for some worm who never built a hot-dog stand to throw rocks at a faithful preacher who gave his life to others in the Lord for 50-years, helping literally millions of people in so many ways and changing a nation for God.
Whether some [old earth] creationists 200 years in the past came to the wrong conclusion about the age of the Earth has no bearing on the truth of the matter.
Not necessarily, because freshwater is less dense and is KNOWN to be able to float on saltwater for a long time.
[[From “From each... to each....”]
"the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
And who was it that was saying that modern Democrats are NOT left-wing? This is the message of Marx, of Lenin, of Hitler, of Mussolini, and every left-wing demagogue since Socrates who would elevate the collective over the individual. It is not possible to subscribe to both human rights and left-wing collectivist ideology. The two are in inherent and fundamental contradiction, which is why decent, well-meaning left-wingers so often find themselves trapped in a maelstrom of cognitive dissonance.
Today, everything is political: education, money, food, sports, pets, healthcare, the weather, clothes, trees — you name it, it’s political. Why? Because the political Left controlled America for decades, that’s why. Leftists make everything political. Why? Because they’re angry, emotional, unhappy, creepy people with an axe to grind. “I didn’t ask to be born!” says the leftist. Really?? Too bad she wasn’t aborted. She went on to become a Senator. Lucky us.
The Colossal Rape of the West [...] the biggest crime in modern history, involving hundreds, if not thousands, of people, as far away as China and Iran.
[...]
1. [...] Trump sends the global Judeo-Left into hysterics in June 2015: he announces his presidential candidacy which includes saying “horrible” things about sweet, innocent, illegal Mexican aliens, and saying that he wants to pursue “America first” policies. OMG! Shades of [...] Charles Lindbergh!
2. [...] Trump wins the American federal election in Nov. 2016, sending the global Left into more hysteria.
3. The elite American Left launches an all-out effort to remove Trump from office. This includes federal government spying on Trump, fake impeachment efforts and especially “framing” Trump for “colluding with Russia.”
4. The Left tries to impeach Trump several times on ridiculous charges, but [...] fails. These [...] efforts are led by Jews, both in and outside of Congress.
5. Realizing that Trump cannot be impeached based upon leftist lies, the Left unleashes Covid-19 upon America and the West in Jan. 2020. Significantly, this virus-unleashing goes a long way in preventing “Trumpism” (i.e., right-wing populism) from spreading across the West and re-invigorating the Western world both politically and economically. A glorious, patriotic, 50-year “Western revival” was murdered in its crib. Yet, few people noticed. (Never forget: Jews don’t think locally. They think globally).
6. Using Covid-19 hysteria as a cover (“you must remain 10 feet away from all ballot counters”), the Nov. 2020 American federal election is stolen. [...] [T]he Left has committed so many felonies that it will take decades to investigate and prosecute all of the crimes.
7. Joe Biden, who was not legitimately elected, signs dozens of bills into law and appoints many dozens of radical federal judges. [He] also destroys Trump’s great American economy and ends America’s energy (oil) independence.
(To be continued…)
[Historical revisionism FTW!]
afrikans taught europeans to read and write!!!
Due to their undying love and thirst for education, thousands of years ago Afrikans (Blacks) in Egypt, which is and always has been in Afrika and Afrikan (Black at least in ancient times), established the Grand Lodge of Luxor, the world’s first university. It had virtually all-Afrikan professor-priests, who taught up to 80, 000 students, says one Black scholar, at all grade levels. So advanced was its curriculum, that the Grand Lodge sounds rather 21st century. Divided into five major departments, the curriculum included astronomy and astrology, geography and geology, and philosophy and theology.
If it had not been for the Moors, meaning “Blacks”, who ruled Spain for over 700 years ,the very idea of university life among Europeans (whites) may never have existed at all. For it was the Moors, natives of Afrika, who taught Europeans about aged medicine and about Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle—three so-called Greek philosophers who learned all they knew from Afrikan priests, who were the real fathers of so-called Greek philosophy. The Moors also taught Europeans to take baths, which was seen as a sin by the Europeans before the Moors came and after they were kicked out of Spain the same year that Christopher Columbus made his famous sail “in 1492—across the ocean blue”. Interestingly, the Moors taught Europeans to wear underwear.
It was also the Moors or Blacks in Spain who established 70 public libraries and 17 famous universities in the 10th and 11th century when the rest of Europe scarcely had one single public library and only two famous universities. That was at a time in Europe when most Europeans (whites), including their kings, were illiterate and even the kings lived in their houses or barns without windows.
Meanwhile, in the fourteenth and fifteenth century, West Afrikan empire of Songhai, namely in the city of Timbuktu, at least one scholar has said that “university life was highly regarded and scholars were greatly respected.” At the center of Timbuktu’s academic life was the University of Sankore, which had Afrikan (Black) professors who were so intellectually sharp that they were qualified to teach at virtually any university in Afrika and Asia at the time. Consequently, students from areas throughout both Afrika and Asia flocked to them to learn from these learned men. As for the Arab (Asians, though often of Afrikan (Black) descent both then and now) would-be professors of that time, they often did not qualify to teach at Sankore because there were not proficient in and knowledgeable enough of the large curriculum that professors at the University of Sankore had to know.
If there is no God, then morality, or "ethics" are meaningless. Socrates and Aristotle were just men who had an opinion. There had no authority to define morality.Since He is God, He has the authority to tell people what to do, and what not to do. I realize YOU want to make the rules, but you can't.Allah is not the God of the Bible. ISIS is breaking God's moral law, for which they will be judged by God. Aristotle's opinions are binding on no one.Allah is not real. And even if it was real, it is not God Almighty. Not the Creator of the universe. Who has the authority to define good and evil, and the authority and ability to hold people accountable to those definitions? Certainly not Aristotle.I don't think you posses the ability to understand what constitutes proof. If you did, you would not have to ask the question.
Also, evolution undermines the biblical teaching that humanity is ONE RACE because we are all descended from Adam...
[Note the dialogue of Euthypho and Socrates: conclusion that what is pious is not because of the quality that it is loved by a god, but for a reason inherent in it, and that the god loves it because it is good.]
Socrates is in Hell right now, burning as we speak. He knew nothing of God, or what is good. So you picked a very bad example to quote from about this subject.
Humans do not have minds capable of knowing what is "good" better than God does. For example, you see many people on this site promoting and/or defending evil causes such as "homosexuality" (one reason why Socrates is now in Hell, by the way) and genocide against human children. They have no basis for saying these things are "good", yet they do. These things are in fact very evil. Many men who society considers "wise" are actually fools. So says God, and God is correct.
God knows what is good and what is not good. His opinion is the one that counts. Not the petty, evil opinion of man. Christ has said that mankind will naturally promote wickedness and evil instead of doing good. That is why you see things like "Gay Pride Parades" and genocide against children. Because the foolishness of man says that "these things are good!" It does not matter how many say that evil things are good - evil things will *NEVER* be good.
It is true that Atheists have no morality. Because a man in his natural state will almost always automatically promote and defend evildoings. Like Akriku and ACElethal and other Atheists promoting "homosexuality", for example. To be moral requires a man to leave his natural state and allow himself to become righteous. Atheists almost never have a reason to do this since they do not obey God's commands, and hence most Atheists have no morality
Jews and Leftists: the Unhappy People
Jews and leftists have one major trait in common: they are perpetually unhappy and dissatisfied.
Leftists are “Jews with less money.” It’s no accident that leftism (especially the New Left) is a Jewish construct.
But Jews are even more unhappy and dissatisfied than leftists. There’s no such thing as a happy Jew. Even the Jewish comedians are “crying on the inside.” And there’s no such thing as a satisfied Jew. Give a yid $100.00 for free and he’ll say “why did you only give me $100.00? Why not $200.00? You must hate Jews!” Moan, complain, bitch, argue, cry, whine, kvetch. That’s what Jews do. They are born crybabies. There isn’t a happy or content Jew on earth. In fact, there’s only one way the Jews could be happy: if everybody on earth was as miserable as they are. Then they’d be happy!
Women In Universities Show Why Women In Universities Are Not A Good Thing
Actually, no one should be in a university today, male or female! They are institutions of Marxism [1]. But I digress.
“Dutton maintained that, as women take over universities, they make universities more female — more focused on rule-following, everyone getting along, and not causing offence. This drives geniuses out of universities, meaning females undermine a key element of universities: the unemotional pursuit of truth.”
.
[1] major universities in America often require, yes, require students to read Marxist literature, e.g., Herbert Marcuse’s books “One-Dimensional Man” (1964) and “Eros and Civilization” (1955). Here’s an example from Michigan State University: [Here].
Britain: Once a Great and Powerful White Nation, Now an Orwellian Nightmare Filled With Thought-Police
(Did you know that Britain has turned so far to the Left that it has “racism police”? Yes. Racism police! They are euphemistically called “Community Safety Units” or also “Community Cohesion Units.” They “fight racism” (but only White racism — I’ll bet you $50.00 cash on that). It’s just like being inside the book “1984” by George Orwell, only it’s 2021 instead of 1984. Worse, in Britain, the “victims” of “hate” decide if the “hate” is actually “hate” or just another paranoid persecution fantasy [1]).
In Britain today, even if you’re a cop, you cannot share a meme of a Black criminal/drug addict who ODed in U.S. police custody. If you do, you’ll face criminal charges, like this guy. Floyd wasn’t even British! And he was a thug and an ex-con! [Article].
.
[1] The UK government says this about “hate” (bold text is mine): “Second, the working definitions of hate incidents and hate crimes in England and Wales are broad. Under these definitions, the “perception of the victim or any other person is the defining factor in determining a hate incident” — so, if Crazy Joe Tranny decides that you have harassed him, oops, her, because, well, he’s, oops, she’s a crazy tranny, then that’s all the cops need to arrest you, or at least file your name in a computer database of “haters.” [Here].
( @Nature_and_Race )
jews are openly calling for the abolition of free speech.
This is why anti-semitism exists in the first place. This is why people hate jews.
jews are a threat to White people's freedom.
image
( @KR91 )
@Nature_and_Race But I'm told 109+ countries only hated them because they were racist and jealous (despite that obviously contradicting the fact that they originally let them in, and many of these countries still had non-Jewish minorities).
( @BloodyProphecy )
@Nature_and_Race To protect TRUE freedom of speech, as well as all our other rights, we MUST fight back against Semitism.
( @voxpopuli2020 )
@Nature_and_Race It didnt work on social media and it wont work on college campuses,
"ideas rise of their own accord" - Socrates
Antisemitism is an idea whose time has come.
( @hecy666 )
@Nature_and_Race You can say anything you want....so long as it doesn't offend the JEWS!
( @gardianAngel )
@Nature_and_Race
What is happening to certain people now will be the norm when the Jews have shaped all the laws of the nations to suit them!
then, we will have it really deep in our .... !
NOW, IS THE TIME TO FIGHT THIS ROT 😡👿
( @Darkraut )
@Nature_and_Race The only thing that happens here is kikes continue down an insane path and we end up rounding them all up and exterminating them, which should have been done thousands of years ago. Looks like it's our time and up to us. I'm excited! I will be known as a jew hunter in my time.
( @Woodzun )
@Nature_and_Race
Seems like all the presidents who were part of the house hearing on antisemitism are going to resign. Oh well, every last one of them hates White people anyway. Good riddance.
Crazy world: we are seeing anti-White University leaders who have been intentionally keeping Whites out of their schools being forced to resign for “antisemitism”.
All You Need to Know About Ukraine
All you need to know about Ukraine today: the Jews, the Biden Administration, the global media, the EU, and Justin Trudeau are all pro-Ukraine (and anti-Russia). Nancy Pelosi said on TV, angrily, that Putin’s soft (relatively speaking) invasion of Ukraine on behalf of two small, largely-Russian breakaway areas of Ukraine (Donetsk and Luhansk) was “an evil move.” Evil? It’s a good thing it wasn’t “evil” when America invaded 20-plus countries over the past 40 years!
I wonder if many people know that scores of rich Washington, D.C. elites have very, very close ties to Ukraine? In fact, you could say that those Washington elites are “in bed with Ukraine.” Got a cigarette, honey??
Also, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is a Jew.
That’s all you need to know about Ukraine.
<the reincarnated spirit behind the guy running Japan's Happy Science cult>
Revealing the Existence of Lord El Cantare
El Cantare is the Lord, Buddha and Savior. He is the supreme God of the terrestrial spirit group who has the highest authority over the planet Earth and is directly connected to the Primordial Buddha or Primordial God – the Creator of the whole universe. Lord El Cantare has supreme authority both in Heaven and on this Earth and is the great spiritual being in whom God and Buddha are united. Lord El Cantare resides in the ninth dimension (Cosmic realm) of the Spirit World and is a leader among other highly evolved spirits, such as Jesus Christ, Moses, Confucius and others, who are known as Angels, Archangels, Tathagatas, and Bodhisattvas. Lord El Cantare is Lord of all people, transcending all races, borders and even this planet.
El Cantare is the origin of life
Lord El Cantare is the origin of life on Earth and has been guiding humanity since the very beginning. He has sent down to Earth such great teachers (saviors and messiahs) as Jesus Christ, Moses, Mohammed, Confucius, Socrates and guided them from the heavenly world. Lord El Cantare is the being whom Jesus called “Father” and Mohammed referred to as “Allah.” In the Old Testament El Cantare is known as Elohim, and he also represents the Tree of Life in the ancient legend of “The Tree of Life.”
Reincarnations of the El Cantare consciousness
Lord El Cantare has also sent down parts of his own consciousness – brother souls – to guide humanity in the right direction at the most important times in history. El Cantare’s brother souls who have been born to Earth in the last twenty thousand years are:
Ra Mu – 17,000 years ago on the Mu continent
Thoth – 12,000 years ago in Atlantis
Rient Arl Croud – 7,000 years ago in the Incan Empire
Ophealis – 6,500 years ago in Greece
Hermes – 4,300 years ago in Greece, Crete Island
Gautama Siddhartha (Shakyamuni Buddha) – 2,500 years ago in India.
Ryuho Okawa – present reincarnation of El Cantare
El Cantare’s name revealed to humanity for the first time
The existence of El Cantare has been revealed for the first time. This has long been the secret of heaven… untill today, when communication and advancements in information and trasnportation technology continues to bring the world closer. As the world population swells towards ten billion, the time has noce come to reveal the Truth about the supreme God of this Earth, how he has led humankind from the very beginning and how he intends to guide people now and into the future. It is the time to unify the world under the name of one God – Lord El Cantare.
The mission of Lord El Cantare
The mission of Lord El Cantare is to bring salvation to all living creatures through the worldwide revelation of the Truth. El Cantare’s role is twofold: one side is represented by the Nyorai Amida (The Savior), which consists of love, compassion, and faith; the other side is represented by the Nyorai Mahavairocana (The Essence of Buddha), which is enlightenment, spiritual learning, and the secret knowledge of the spiritual domain. Lord El Cantare has a mission to reorganize the high spirits in heaven, while also integrating all the various religions on Earth to create a new world religion. He has a mission to gather all the people of the world into this new faith, to see the development of a new civilization, and so herald the advent of a new age for the world.
Lord El Cantare is the greatest being responsible for the planet Earth and everyone who lives in this age is witnessing a miracle, which happens only once in hundreds of thousands of years.
I watched some TV news footage of the Mount Rushmore protests by anti-American jerks last night, but all I really saw were two dozen fat, redskin Indians making animal noises while banging on drums. Maybe they don’t speak English? (A quick list of the accomplishments of American Indians during the past 500 years: 1) scalping people; 2) planting corn; 3) ???? That’s not much of a list, is it? At least now the redskins have telephones, dentists and air conditioning).
There has been much talk in the news recently about a famous Penn State college football coach who has been accused of sexually abusing several young boys. The coach has maintained his innocence, but admits to foolishly showering NAKED with several young boys. This case alone shows what's wrong with public nakedness. One thing often leads to another and public nudity is asking for trouble. Americans are deceived to think that males and females can walk around immodestly dressed without consequences.
The Bible teaches that it's best to stay as far away from sin as possible, which is why Jesus equated lust with adultery (Matthew 5:28). James 1:14-16 plainly teach what is wrong with public nakedness, for it is the root cause of sexual immorality...
James 1:14-16, “But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death. Do not err, my beloved brethren.”
It all begins with lust. If you aren't in the presence of other naked people, then you cannot be drawn away by lust. it's not rocket-science!
It is unscriptural for men to shower naked around other men, let alone in the presence of young boys. This Scripture passage makes this clear. It is not good for men to see each other naked, as evidenced by the pederast homosexual problem. The Romans were infamous for pederasts (men having sex with boys). Socrates, the famous Greek philosopher, was a pederast homosexual.
There is nothing manly about men disrespecting one another by walking around naked in the shower room. It is proper and right for men to show respect for the body, and toward their fellow mankind, by clothing the body. It is more than coincidence that initiates into Luciferian occult groups are required to perform acts of homosexuality as part of their initiation rights. The purpose for this is to debase each other, removing all bastions of decency and reservation between one another. In all sexual relations, even if with a prostitute for a few minutes, a soul-tie is formed between the two people (whether male or female) involved in the act. This is one of the spiritual dangers of sexual immorality, which undermines one's entire soul's health. Proverb 6:32, “But whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he that doeth it destroyeth his own soul.”
I heard an internet radio commercial today advertising the product, “AGELESS MALE,” guaranteed to boost testosterone for men by 61%. Then the advertiser said, “Get back in the game!” That's not why I wrote this article, but the timing was perfect for this article, because it evidences the sinful and irresponsible attitude of society today toward sexual relations. Get back in the game??? Sadly, sex is a game to many people!!! This is the horrible consequence of America's sexually-indecent television programming, promiscuous sitcoms, perverted Late Night comedy shows and TV in general.
I don't watch TV because it is too evil. So when I do occasionally see a TV show on someone else's TV in a hotel or at a restaurant, I am absolutely shocked and angered by what I see and hear. If you watch TV all-the-time, you won't see just how evil it is, because you are sinking into the abyss of wickedness with the hellivision. I guarantee you that if you turn off your television for 6-months that you'll be absolutely shell-shocked when you turn it back on. I hate TV!
It is common practice in health clubs, YMCA's and locker-rooms across America for men to shower naked in the presence of other men, and to walk around naked and let it all hang out. It is uncouth, tasteless, lacking of respect for each other and unscriptural. The same is true of women's locker-rooms. Historically, sports and public nudity have always been synonymous. The Greeks were famous for sports and infamous for nudity.
Genesis 9:21-27 teach us several important life-changing and moral lessons. We see that alcoholic beverages are spiritually dangerous, linked to nakedness and sin. Noah sinned by getting drunk and led his son to sin by doing so. Don't think that Noah didn't think about that either. Noah had to live with the division created between him and his son because of booze. Alcohol brought shame upon Noah. Noah had to live from that day forward knowing that Ham saw him naked and drunk. Although Noah knew he was forgiven in Christ, he caused permanent division between he and his son, Ham.
We also see that Ham sinfully paraded his father's sins, instead of faithfully concealing the matter. America's history books, Wikipedia and newspapers are filled with what husbands and wives have hypocritically said about each other during and after a divorce. The next time you hear a woman talking about how evil her husband is ask her how she obtained perfection. The Bible warns against condemning anyone. James 4:12, “There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?”
By the way, I hate Wikipedia. I've noticed that celebrity profiles (like George Clooney) are locked, but gospel preacher's profiles are open for every snake, rat and God-hating trash to slander and serve roast preacher. Wikipedia is a sewer of American society and Jimmy Wales will give account to God for helping spread malicious gossip. Wikipedia is a weapon. It's easy for some worm who never built a hot-dog stand to throw rocks at a faithful preacher who gave his life to others in the Lord for 50-years, helping literally millions of people in so many ways and changing a nation for God.
[...]
The Demon-Possessed Maniac of Gadarenes
Luke 8:27 and 35, “And when he went forth to land, there met him out of the city a certain man, which had devils long time, and ware no clothes, neither abode in any house, but in the tombs... Then they went out to see what was done; and came to Jesus, and found the man, out of whom the devils were departed, sitting at the feet of Jesus, clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid.”
What a precious passage of Scripture! This afflicted man was possessed by devils, running around naked and living in the wild. The entire city knew he was insane. Yet the Bible says when he found Jesus, he came into his right mind and put his clothes back on. Amen! Jesus is the cure for insanity and nudity.
Millions of Americans go to psychologists, psychiatrists and religious leaders for help; but the Word of God says the afflicted man at Gadarenes came into his RIGHT MIND when he found Jesus. It is interesting that being in one's “right mind” is associated with being properly clothed. Americans have a problem keeping their clothes on because they AREN'T in their right minds, they are mentally-ill. This is clearly evidenced by the fact that nearly half of the women in America have murdered a child by abortion. Only a mentally-ill person would deliberately kill a precious child. So it doesn't surprise me in a rotten society that devours it's own children that they would also have a problem with nudity.
The Cure for Nudity is Jesus!
Women who love and respect the Lord won't wear bikinis at the beach, or wear miniskirts, or wear pants, or pose in Playboy. There's not an honest normal man alive who doesn't know what's wrong with women wearing pants—they are extremely revealing of a woman's flesh.
We are living in evil times, when unrepentant sinners are trying to justify every sin imaginable with the Bible. I heard a woman on the news, a professional pornographic model, claim that God approved of her vile career. She said that God created Adam and Eve naked, so nudity must be ok. Evidently she's never read Genesis 3:7 or 1st Timothy 2:9.
Here's a Scripture for all you women who keep trying to justify your nudity and immodest clothing ... “Ye have wearied the LORD with your words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the LORD, and he delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment?” (Malachi 2:17). Beyonce Knowles claims to be a devout Christian; yet says she has permission from God to wear sexy clothes and strip on stage. She is woefully wrong! Beyonce needs to see Jesus.
God knows what we watch on TV. It's just as bad to watch adultery on TV as it would be for us to be in same room with them. The TV has a desensitizing effect on its viewers. Sin is not shocking anymore but rather becomes commonplace (no big deal). This is why many people have become lackadaisical and acceptant of the wicked sin of homosexuality. The following reads like a synopsis of hellivision and unholy-wood:
Romans 1:28-32 -"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:"
Jewish Dennis Prager Talks Amount Managing Your Emotions After Being Called a Nazi
Dennis Prager is one of those rare charismatic Jews. Most Jews are repulsive and uncharismatic, literal caricatures out of Seinfeld or something. The one Jew with a similar countenance to Prager that comes to mind is the late Stan Lee of Marvel Comics, who was genuinely likable.
It’s like a Jewish superpower to not be repulsive, so he is somewhat interesting to watch.
For those who don’t know, Prager runs “Prager U,” which is a Jewish right-wing YouTube operation. To give you an idea where they are, they recently hired the black white nationalist Candace Owens after she left Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA.
Although he is less known than many shills, he is one of the key ideological figureheads of the fake, controlled opposition right-wing. He has been a Jewish activist his entire life, and began his career in the 1970s by speaking on the plight of Jews in the USSR and lobbying for them to be allowed to flee in mass numbers to the West, and America in particular. He wrote a book about how Judaism is an ethical religion, and preached morality, becoming known as the “Jewish Billy Graham” – this is despite the fact that he is pro-abortion. I have no specific reason to doubt that he believes as he says he believes with regards to his religious opposition to secular Judaism, and his dislike of homosexuals and Moslems, but all this means is that he is a Zionist shill, who is able to use some overlapping moral principles with Christians to force a Jewish agenda on them. He was #NeverTrump until Donald Trump got the Republican nomination, at which point he endorsed him, but said he was his “17th choice out of 17 candidates.”
Right-wing Jewish shills like Prager are dangerous because of the way they mix truths – sometimes very good truths – with lies and Jewish shilling. It is a magnificent art, this ability to start with something that people instinctively understand as true, and then use a kind of anti-Socratic method to lead people into believing a lie. This group of fake right-wing Jewish shills is much more dangerous than any lunatic leftist, and Prager is among the worst of them, both because of his charisma and the skill with which he uses the anti-Socratic method.
And yet, Prager is now being called a Nazi, along with his tribesfellow Ben Shapiro and the shabbos goy shill Jordan Peterson.
In his latest “fireside chat,” Prager responded to being called a Nazi, and talked about how he deals with this sort of thing. I was interested, because I am also called a Nazi – much more often than Jew Prager, at least thus far – as a way to insult me and claim that nothing I say matters because I am evil.
On the point of whether I am a Nazi or not – that is entirely irrelevant, because this is only being used as an insult. It is used against me in the same way it is used against the Jew Prager – simply to dismiss what I am saying. There is no definition of this word in the media – it just means “evil white man.”
I do not consider myself to be a “Nazi” in the way I am referred to as such, because this definition – or lack thereof – being used by the Jewish media has no meaning. I believe that Adolf Hitler was a great man who has been massively maligned and lied about by the Jewish establishment, I believe that Mein Kampf is among the most important books ever written and I believe that the National Socialists promoted a lot of common sense ideas. But I simply consider myself a nationalist and a traditionalist, and believe that my respect for Hitler and the NSDAP fits into that framework.
Hitler is, in my view, one of the many great Christian leaders of the European people.
Regrettably, Prager’s talk had to do with how to personally manage being insulted, not how to respond politically to these types of defamatory insults. He said: “I don’t let the insults go to my heart and I don’t let the compliments go to my head.” That is, to be fair, good enough advice, and advice that I would also give anyone. I don’t have a problem managing my emotions, and people hating me is actually a kind of fuel for me, as it drives my internal burning desire for revenge. And I’m not prone to pridefulness either, as I believe that my work is only going to be good if I am constantly, scathingly self-critical.
But sure, it’s good personal advice for a public figure.
He also says that the only thing that actually bothers him is being misquoted. And I agree with that, absolutely. The HuffPo has taken to printing literal fake quotes from me, and has refused to stop when I asked them to, actually continuing to fabricate more quotes while publicly acknowledging that I had asked them to stop. That was the angriest I’ve ever been on the internet.
However, what I was looking for here was some kind of Jewish strategy for politically managing these insults, and turning them around on the people making them. I have generally used the “agree and amplify” method of saying “yes, I am a Nazi and I plan to masturbate all Jews to death and when I am dictator, I will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law any wolves who hide you in their caves and feed you if you escape my masturbation machines.”
But I’m always looking for new ideas.
I should have known better than to think I’d get any from a fake right-wing Jewish shill. The only Jewish ideas that are ever interesting are the ones from radically honest Jews who forward their agenda with brutality, such as Saul Alinsky.
Just for the record, after saying the obviously true – though simplistic to the point of being almost useless, like something out of the Berenstain Bears (also Jewish) – thing about dealing with insults and praise, Prager went on to talk about how trannies should be respected and treated like the sex they claim to be.
Because of course.
Because Dennis Prager is most definitely not a Nazi.
He is of his father the devil, and the lusts of his father he will do. His father was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
Those with eyes can see the curse of his father written on his face.
( @Nature_and_Race )
The forbidden philosopher.
And his forbidden philosophy.
image
image
@Nature_and_Race Such beautiful work.
Btw, who's the "forbidden philosopher? Socrates?
( @Toodank2bunderstood )
@Nature_and_Race they hated Hitler because he spoke the truth
( @Occidental_Rome1 )
@Nature_and_Race Let's make this simple:
Race! Unity! Sacrifice/Struggle! self-made:Destiny!
( @AngolaTrader96 )
@Nature_and_Race I first read Mein Kampf in Summer 2017. I became Jew-wise only about 5-6 months before then. Mein Kampf helped me articulate my viewpoints better. It gave me much more confidence in my ideology.
( @Karen_Melzer )
@Nature_and_Race no Hitler. Because he gaught the right enemy and his ideology was patriotic
( @UltramegaJew )
@Nature_and_Race
>Translated by (((Ralph Manheim)))
https://web.archive.org/web/20220426051902/https://anoccasionalcomment.blogspot.com/2019/11/regarding-english-translations-of-mein.html
image
( @Nature_and_Race )
@UltramegaJew -- Manheim wasn't Jewish. He never said he was Jewish, nor did the Jews claim him at any point of his life or after his death.
Thus far, the Manheim translation is the most accurate in both letter and spirit, though far from perfect.
( @anotherjessica96 )
@Nature_and_Race is mein kamp his only writing? I already have read two versions, and i have a book on his speeches, the only thing left is for me to read that german philospsher he mentions in mein kampf, cant remember his name. What am i missing?
John Bolton clandestinely claims he’s related to a very large Masonic Norwegian Neanderthal family that descends directly from Egyptian Pharaoh King Tutankhamen.
Further, that these Egyptian Pharaohs were all created by the Anunnaki God Anu (Yahweh), who used his own DNA (Adams rib) along with the DNA of Zeta Aliens and DNA of Chimpanzees to create the Neanderthal species.
Bolton, a top-level Mason, moreover believes the Aryan race likewise, was also created from the DNA of the Anunnaki mixed with the DNA of Rhesus monkey, whereby proxy, created an entirely different species of mankind.
The source for this article is John Bolton’s nephew, Greg T Dixon, a Masonic High school friend and informant deeply connected with Freemasonry.
Reportedly Bolton and the Illuminati (Masons) believe in addition, that Aryans (Cro-Magnons) are the favored ‘Chosen’ conservative species of the Sumerian (Aryan) ‘God’ Anu (aka Yahweh)
Aryans historically, have been protected by Anu numerous times from the more aggressive Neanderthals repeated genocidal attempts, after flooding them from the face of the planet and rebuilding the Aryan race in their place.
This event has happened at least four times in history, two of which documented in the Bible under Noah and The Exodus.
Anu’s favored (non-aggressive) Aryan race include people like Noah, Socrates, DaVinci, Tesla, Ford, Malcolm X, Hitler and Trump.
<...>
Reportedly, Jews originate from Draco reptilians (the Anunnaki and Zetas both are reptilian as well). Dracos claim they have been living on planet earth since before the Anunnaki and Zetas arrived to create mankind, and therefore considered themselves earth’s original inhabitants.
<...>
Ultimately, “Jews and Neanderthals” (Pharisees and Pharaohs) teamed up together with Lucifer’s ‘Fallen Angles’ (through interbreeding). And along with their offspring, the Nephilim, set out to exterminate the entire Aryan race from the planet – Anu’s favored conservative Cro-Magnon species.
A recent email from a friend: "Sue, I'm seeing more and more 'evangelical' churches come out in support of gay marriage. Also, Christian friends are changing their views on the validity of the LGBT lifestyle being acceptable for a Christ-follower. I start worrying that I'm missing something, and even start questioning my beliefs."
No, my dear friend, you are not missing something, but it is a good time to question (not doubt) your beliefs so you can be more convinced than ever that the Creator God has not changed and neither has His word.
I think there are two big reasons so many confessing believers in Christ have allowed themselves to be more shaped by the culture than by the truth of God's word, drifting into spiritual compromise and even into apostasy (abandoning the truth of one's faith). This is not a new problem; the apostle Paul urged his readers in Rome, "Don't let the world around you squeeze you into its own mold, but let God re-mold your minds from within. . ." (Romans 12:2, Phillips).
Reason One: Rejecting the Authority of God's Word
The bitter fruit of several decades of shallow preaching, teaching and discipleship is that many believers have been especially vulnerable to Satan's deceptive question to Eve in the Garden of Eden: "Did God really say . . .?" When Christians ignore or flat-out reject the unmistakably clear biblical statements condemning homosexual relationships, they are playing into the enemy's temptation to justify disobedience by making feelings and perceptions more important than God's design and standards.
There are now two streams of thought on same-sex relationships and behavior, the Traditional View and the Revisionist View. The Revisionist View basically says, "It doesn't matter what the Bible actually says, it doesn't mean what 2000 years of church history has said it means, it means what we want it to say."
People are redefining the Bible, gender and marriage according to what will let them do what they want, when they should (in my opinion) be asking the insightful question posed by Paul Mooris in Shadow of Sodom, "[A]m I trying to interpret Scripture in the light of my proclivity, or should I interpret my proclivity in the light of Scripture?"
The Bible:
Traditional View
The Bible is inspired by a Holy God and is inherently true and trustworthy. The Bible is written by men, but divinely inspired by the Holy Spirit and is sealed by a God of truth and authority.
Revisionist View
The scriptures which traditional Christianity understands to condemn homosexuality [such as Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13; Romans 1:26-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:9-10] have either been mistranslated, yanked out of context or were only appropriate to the culture of that time. Therefore, we no longer have to follow passages we don't like.
Sexuality:
Traditional View
Sexuality and sex are God's good gifts to men and women. While sexuality is an essential attribute of human nature, our Creator did not intend it to be the defining characteristic of humanity.
Revisionist View
Sexuality—the feelings and attractions one feels for other people—is God ordained, diverse, deeply personal and morally permissible. One's sexual orientation, whatever it is, should be celebrated as one of God's good gifts.
Gender:
Traditional View
God created both male and female in His image, and each gender reflects different aspects of the imago Dei. God's sovereign choice of gender for every person reflects His intention for that person's identity; it is one of the ways in which he or she glorifies Him as Creator.
Revisionist View
We are free to make a distinction between sex and gender. Sex is biological maleness or femaleness at birth, and gender is how one feels about their "true" maleness or femaleness internally. Based on Galatians 3:28, "there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
Marriage:
Traditional View
Marriage is God-ordained between one man and one woman in a lifelong, monogamous, covenantal relationship. The Bible begins with the marriage of Adam and Eve, and ends with the marriage of the Lamb (Jesus) and the Bride (the church). The complementarity of husband and wife express God's intention of both genders in marriage.
Revisionist View
Homosexual behavior is appropriate within the confines of a committed, loving, monogamous, lifelong, Christ-centered relationship.
Both individual Christians and churches have drifted into endorsing same-sex relationships because it always feels better to follow one's flesh than to follow Jesus' call to "deny yourself, take up your cross and follow Me" (Matt. 16:24).
Reason Two: Snagged by the Gay Agenda
In addition to those several decades of shallow preaching, teaching and discipleship I mentioned earlier, many believers have not been submitting themselves to the truth of the Word of God. By default, then, they were easily shaped and swayed by the six points of a brilliantly designed "Gay Manifesto" spelled out in a book called After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s. Originally published as an essay called "The Overhauling of Straight America" that was published in a gay magazine, the authors laid out this plan which has been executed perfectly in the United States. (The quotes below are from the essay, found here)
1. Desensitization and normalization of homosexuals in mainstream America. Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and often as possible.
"The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances.
"In the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the masses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. Instead, the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the camel get his nose inside the tent—only later his unsightly derriere!"
2. Portray members of the LGBTQ community as victims. Indoctrinate mainstream America that members of the LGBTQ community were "born this way."
"In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector."
"Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth communicating. First, the mainstream should be told that gays are victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their sexual preference. The message must read: 'As far as gays can tell, they were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black or bright or athletic. Nobody ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a choice, and are not morally blameworthy. What they do isn't willfully contrary - it's only natural for them. This twist of fate could as easily have happened to you!'"
3. Give protectors a just cause: anti-discrimination
"Our campaign should not demand direct support for homosexual practices, should instead take anti-discrimination as its theme."
4. The use of TV, music, film and social media to desensitize mainstream Americans to their plight as gay people
Over the past 25 years, gay characters, on TV especially, have captured the hearts of American viewers because they were attractive, funny, smart—the kind of characters viewers would like to be. No one was shown the dark underside of gay bars and bathhouses, or same-sex domestic violence, or having to get one's HIV+ status checked.
5. Portray gays and lesbians as pillars in society. Make gays look good.
"From Socrates to Shakespeare, from Alexander the Great to Alexander Hamilton, from Michelangelo to Walt Whitman, from Sappho to Gertrude Stein, the list is old hat to us but shocking news to heterosexual America. In no time, a skillful and clever media campaign could have the gay community looking like the veritable fairy godmother to Western Civilization."
Use celebrities and celebrity endorsement. And who doesn't love Ellen DeGeneres?
6. Once homosexuals have begun to gain acceptance, anti-gay opponents must be vilified, causing them to be viewed as repulsive outcasts of society.
"Our goal is here is twofold. First, we seek to replace the mainstream's self-righteous pride about its homophobia with shame and guilt. Second, we intend to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types.
"The public should be shown images of ranting homophobes whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust middle America. These images might include: the Ku Klux Klan demanding that gays be burned alive or castrated; bigoted southern ministers drooling with hysterical hatred to a degree that looks both comical and deranged; menacing punks, thugs, and convicts speaking coolly about the 'fags' they have killed or would like to kill; a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed."
This is how I see how we got to this place where so many people have been deceived. They didn't anchor themselves to the Truth of the Word of God, and they opened themselves to the cultural brine of Kirk and Madsen's plan to overhaul straight America.
And it worked.
I will close with three personal observations about this situation:
Christians have bought into the culture's worship of feelings over God's unchanging revelation
People love how being a protector of the underdog makes them feel
Not enough of us Christ-followers are living lives that demonstrate the beauty and satisfaction of abiding in Christ
To my sweet friend who asked the question, let me say: God's good gift of sex and the intimacy of the marriage relationship is still intended ONLY for one man and one woman for life. In the beginning, one (Adam) became two (when God formed Eve from Adam), and then the two became one again. That is a deep mystery that makes all variations and deviations on God's intention wrong.
I am indebted to Hope Harris for her insight and analysis of this question.
Rich Hollywood Chad is a Cannibal and Abusive Sexual Deviant
Every time I think I've seen the limits of caucusoid degeneracy and sickness, something like this comes out. Cannibalism? Really guys? I'm convinced all white people and kikes are inherently mentally ill and deranged. What the fuck is wrong with you people? Make no mistake, all so-called white people are like this. It's just a matter of if they have the power and opportunity. You think the term "white devil" is sarcasm?
Oh and before you mention Papua New Guinea and their flesh-eating ways, they allegedly got that from JEWS.
But since he's chad, no one will care. Women will tune into the doc and talk about how "hot" he is. But if you cold approach the same woman IRL she will call the cops on you cuz you're not chad.
Armie Hammer’s ‘cannibalism’ is just one ‘dark, twisted’ family secret
They love to whitewash our history, nothing new there. Acting like they're the only civilization builders.
We were building empires (not just Egypt) when they were banging rocks together and not washing their asses properly. (A caucusoid tendency which continues to THIS DAY).
They stole all of our knowledge and claimed it as their own. That's what the pale-skinned menace does.
Even the likes of Socrates and Plato raved about Africa and studied for YEARS under the tutelage of the REAL sages there. Modern caucusoids don't know shit. They think they invented everything. Stupid cocksuckers.
A philosophical question to ponder, which I’d like to answer as well: would today’s White, self-hating leftism exist if the Jews had not pioneered communism and socialism circa 1840? In other words, would liberal “Enlightenment values” (circa 1715-onward) alone have made White, self-hating liberalism “a thing” today? Without the influence of communism and socialism? I say no. Enlightenment values alone weren’t nearly radical enough to create modern, White, self-hating liberalism. Even the Old Left (circa 1930) didn’t have the self-hate that modern White leftism has — one reason being that today’s Left is heavily female-dominated, e.g., by college students, teachers, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi. Also, the New Left was birthed by Herbert Marcuse, who was a Marxist. So, no, Enlightenment values by themselves could not have made today’s vicious, self-hating White liberalism. It required some extra “Jewish poison” to bring it to full bloom, e.g., the Frankfurt School. Today’s Left is ultimately a Jewish construct).
Defining the White Leftist Mindset in One Paragraph
Defining the White, leftist mindset, as it relates to White culture, in one paragraph:
White leftism is ultimately a jealous and angry attack on White males because they invented the world, and indeed that was their cardinal sin: White males invented the world! How dare they! Leftism says: “How dare the White males hog all of the glory! How dare they stand head and shoulders above everybody else! The White males must be punished for their success, for their centuries-long hegemony! How dare the White males give the world to mankind and leave everyone else to play second and third fiddle! We’ll cut those White males down to size!” You always hate and envy people who are better than you. Also, leftists are unhappy people who hate themselves, mostly for having been born White. They are also more emotional and therefore quick to complain.
.
[Footnote] you might say, “you forgot to mention White colonialism.” No. White colonialism benefited Brown and Black people, as Black writer Walter Williams admitted in his January 2002 article “South Africa After Apartheid” [Here. The money quote: “The tragic fact of business is that ordinary Africans were better off under colonialism.”]. Any leftist beef against White colonialism is related to the leftist beef against White male success in general.
Women Geniuses: the Latest Thing
Best meme I’ve seen in months and I’ll tell you why:
“Behind every great woman is a team of men who did all the actual work.”
There’s a new thing around. A narrative. Very PC. It’s all the rage. It basically goes “a brilliant woman invented X, Y or Z but never got any credit for it because sexist White men hogged all the credit because White men are chauvinist pigs who keep women down.” That’s the usual, basic narrative.
Example: I just saw such a narrative two days ago on the internet that basically went: “a female physicist helped win WWII for the allies by inventing anti-radar technology that allowed allied airplanes to avoid German radar.” She was brilliant! A genius! Sure. Right. Okay. (Did you know that an Italian woman invented Velcro? Yeah. She was pulling a wool sweater over her head and it got caught on her mustache. *rim shot* Couldn’t resist. Velcro was actually invented by Swiss electrical engineer George de Mestral in 1941).
