www.quora.com

Wayne Leigh #wingnut #crackpot #conspiracy #racist #dunning-kruger quora.com

Based on y chromosomes, the Germans have a haplogroup L1 all to themselves and their kin. This should be the main contributor to the substratum in their language. Uralic and Finno-Ugric people likely originate from N haplogroup, although they are very mixed now. So it's unlikely the substratum language in Germanic is Uralic. The R1b haplogroup in Germans likely originate from the Bell Beaker people who might be related to the Basques, so it might be worth also to find traces of Vasconic as well in German. Despite the baseless assertions of Aryanists, R1b is clearly not part of the Indo-European invasion.

Wayne Leigh #dunning-kruger #conspiracy #wingnut #racist #moonbat quora.com

The politically incorrect answer would be that like the rest of R1b, they were descended from the neolithic farmers who came to Europe from anatolia speaking various related languages. The Bell Beaker people were a development from these farming societies. When the R1a came conquering from the steppes, some mixed races speaking predominantly Indo-European languages were created, such as the Celts. But the languages of the ancient farmers continue to exist well into Roman times till they were eventually subsumed into the majority. Languages such as old Iberian, Etruscan and Basque. Eventually only Basque held out. Its pretty much the the Han colonisation of South China. All the Yue were Sinicized except the Vietnamese. Yet their DNA is still closer to Vietnamese rather than Han. No one would identify O2a as DNA of ancient Han, but its a third of the southern Han. The only thing which stopped West Europeans from identifying R1b as neolithic farmer as against being steppe nomads are their self-identification as Aryan conquerors rather than members of a conquered race.

Wyie Naout #dunning-kruger #conspiracy quora.com

As much as can possibly be legally brought against them, if they did that.

As for what Trump actually said was that “there are fine people on both sides”.

Liberals lie that “both sides” are defined as one side being Neo Nazis/White Supremacists, and the other side being anti Nazi/ White supremacist.

That definition is a deliberate lie.

There were some Neo Nazis that did not want the statue torn down.

But there others on that side who were not Neo Nazis or White Supremacists of any kind, and who had nothing whatsoever to do with the racist, haters, who were also there.

Those others were the “fine people” on that side of the issue, who Trump was talking about.

The idiocy of the claim by liberals showing that Trump was not saying anything in favor of the Nazis, is that even they admit that he said there were fine people on both sides.

By their definition, that would have mean that Trump was (supposedly) saying “there are fine Nazis, and fine anti Nazis”.

You can’t have it both ways.

No one who sides with Nazis ever says anything good about those who are clearly against Nazis.

It would be like Nazis themselves, saying that some of the Jews we all want dead and call “subhuman”, are “fine people”

No one with a brain, would be stupid enough to believe that any Nazis would ever say such a thing.

Wayne Leigh #conspiracy #dunning-kruger #racist #wingnut quora.com

As you have yourself supplied part of the answer, it is obviously not. Besides it's geographical concentration, the other obvious facts are (1) the age of the haplogroup is obviously far older than Indo-European, and the main migration route was via Anatolia, not the Steppes unlike the R1a. (2) the R1b were in Western Europe much earlier than the R1a. They founded locally the Bell Beaker culture, which originated from the coasts of Iberia. (3) the people in Ibera, large areas of France and Northern Italy spoke non-IE languages right into historical times, only switching partially to Celtic, then almost fully to Romance languages in the days of the Roman empire. (4) Basque, which retains its old pre-IE language also have the highest concentration of Rib, and lowest for R1a. All the assumptions that R1b is IE does not hold water, in the face of these data. What we can, however, say is that R1a and R1b split nearly 20 thousand years ago, before IE existed. The languages they spoke also evolved independently. The R1b folks arrived in Western Europe, and replaced most populations except in Scandinavia and the Balkans, where they mixed with the local Germanic (I1) and the (I2) Balkan natives. The arrival of of the R1a from the Steppes later on led to the mixing of the R1a and R1b in central Europe to produce Celtic, an IE language with tantalising links to Basque. The colonization of large areas of Europe by the Celts resulted in widespread language replacement, though much of Ibera and France remained old pre-IE. Only the Roman conquests successfully converted these areas to IE speaking, with the exception of its last remnants in the Basque territories. It is pride and refusal to identify with the vanquished that led people to insist that R1b is IE.

Wayne Leigh #conspiracy #racist #wingnut #crackpot #dunning-kruger quora.com

This belief is very popular, probably because white people want to identify with Indo-European conquerors. But it totally, absolutely, doesn't make sense anymore than the Chinese insisting that the neolithic Liangzhu civilization (O1, related to Austronesian/Daic) on the Yangtze delta is Sinitic (O3 from Sino-Tibetan). It is impossible for R1a and R1b to both be the source of Indo-European since they are geographically far apart. Looking at the y-haplogroup map of Europe its obvious that Indo-European must have originated with R1a, and that R1b folks underwent a language switch along the way. The R1b must have arrived in Western Europe before the Indo-Europeans, and they founded the famous Bell Beaker Culture, before the Indo-European Celts (themselves a hybrid of R1a and R1b from central Europe), and the Romans subsequently assimilated them. The Germanic people are even more complex, being originally I1 before being first absorbed by the R1b Bell Beaker people, then the R1a Indo-Europeans. The Basques, Etruscans and others speak remnants of the old R1b languages. This should be the honest conclusion untainted by the desire to be the conquering race. White doesn't necessarily mean Indo-European, and Indo-European doesn't necessarily mean white.

Wayne Leigh #wingnut #conspiracy #racist #fundie quora.com

If you just look at the Y DNA map of Europe, the most obvious answer to this, which are rejected by Indo-Europeanists, is that R1b split from R1a long before the rise of the language itself, and that the R1b folks moved into western Europe in neolithic times, developing many stone age cultures including the Funnel Beaker culture, and speaking many related languages including Vasconic. The R1a Yamnaya people then arrived later from the steppes, with their ability to travel far with their domestication of the horse. They took over central Europe and mixed with the R1b locals to create the hybrid Celtic culture, which eventually spread all over western Europe, becoming the lingua franca. The Basques are just a residual people who did not make the language shift. In fact during Roman times, many R1b folks still spoke non-Aryan languages, particularly in southwestern France, Iberia and northern Italy. Most of them made the language switch only in medieval times. But the Indo-Europeanists are so fixated on being the conqueror race, they cannot accept the idea that R1b Celts and Latin peoples were in some ways subjugated by the R1a Slavs and Balts some time in the past. Even the base y DNA for the Germans was I1. They were first assimilated into the Beaker culture by the R1b folks, then by the R1a Yamnaya folks, creating the unique German branch of Indo-European.

Darren Blair #wingnut #dunning-kruger quora.com

The term “Intellectual Dark Web” was created as a smear against a group of academics, pundits, and others who actively rejected “progressive” politics despite being in the exact fields where “progressive” politics tends to find the most fertile soil.

The idea was to scare people away from looking these individuals up or anything that they had to say, part of a larger effort on the part of a number of people who do practice “progressive” politics to try and prevent competing ideas from being heard.

Wayne leigh #conspiracy #racist #dunning-kruger #wingnut quora.com

I find it infuriating that researchers routinely reject or try to explain away with ridiculous assertions that R1b in Basques were introduced from male Indo-Europeans. If that is so, why do the Basques have the highest level of R1b and why do its surrounding regions such as Spain and Aquitaine have more R1b than those furter away, and inversely less R1a? The only logical explanation is that rhe R1b folks were speaking languages related to Vasconic rather than Indo-European. R1b would have been responsible for the Bell Beaker culture, and its wxpansion. Celtic would have been a hybridization of Vasconic and Indo-European in central Europe, resulting from an IE elite ruling over a mixed population. The hybridization produced a superior culture which took over former Vasconic lands, resulting in a first language shift. There remained many places which still spoke Vasconic even after the Celtic take over. The subsequent Latinization of these lands further eroded the position of Vasconic. The Aquitanian language thus disappeared completely. Yet these former Vasconic/Bell Beaker places exhibit the highest level of R1b, regardless of whether this was a local cultural expansion from Spain or a invasion.

Wayne Leigh #conspiracy #racist #wingnut quora.com

Most answers assume that R1b and IE are the same. The assumption probably stems from the unthinkable, horrifying alternative that R1b folks could have adopted the IE language from the inferior, R1a Slavic people. R1b and IE⁸ are of course not the same. It predates IE by millennia. It is found in Tarim basin (the ancient mummies did not speak Tocharian. Tocharians were R1a), Africa, and in Europe itself as early as 14000 years ago. The fact that the highest concentration of R1b is to be found in Aquitaine, Navarra and the northern Spanish coast speaks volumes. It is absolutely illogical to speak of dna replacement by violence or otherwise when the more “Indo-European” regions in fact have lower concentrations of R1b but higher levels of R1a. The data speaks for itself. The concentration of R1b coincides with the expansion of the Bell Beaker culture. These R1b people spoke Vasconic, Etruscan and other ancient languages. These R1b folks would have come, not from the Steppe, but from the Caucasus and Anatolia, via the Balkans and the sea, as neolithic farmers. They displaced earlier hunter-gathers. The innovations of the Bell Beaker enabled them to expand to all of Western Europe. But their expansion pitted them against the R1a IE folks pushing westwards as evidenced by the Corded Ware and other IE groups

Miles Kendziorski #sexist quora.com

God has made it clear not to have children until your hips are wide enough sometime in your 20s? What about if you take a woman in her 20s that is extremely petite and tiny to the point that she doesn’t look bigger than a 14 year old, and what if you take a 14 year old that is already as large in the hips as the average woman? Does that mean that the tiny woman in her 20s should never have children? Generally speaking, a person’s body is incredibly smart, and if a girl is able to become pregnant it’s because her body has deemed her ready. Being able to give life, but then you must wait for multiple other things to fall inline first? That makes no sense, that’s like putting on your pants first, and then your underwear. Now could your 20s be the best time to have children physically? It could be, but I don’t believe that that automatically disqualifies someone from having children in your early teens. My grandmother started having kids when she was 14 or 15, she lived to her 90s, had excellent health until she crossed over, she had at least 6 children.

John M #sexist quora.com

Biology says that a female is ready and able to bear children when she starts to menstruate. Biology is always right and biology always knows best. Also a females body doesn't need to be fully grown and fully developed for it to be safe for her to get pregnant and give birth. A females hips are also wide enough at those ages. Most females bodies are also fully grown and fully developed by age 15 and all peoples bodies are fully grown and are fully developed by age 17.

Brad #fundie quora.com

Yashua, Jesus Christ, Gabriel, Athena, Apollo, Aphrodite and Zeus.
Artemis confessed. She is a fallen Angel. The Queen of Heaven is with Satan.
Abaddon confessed. He is a fallen Angel. Abaddon is with Satan. Isn’t he supposed to imprison Satan?
Like in that prophecy stuff no human knows how to read but thinks they do?
Oh they are named in scripture. What a coincidence.
Now I know what you’re thinking.
Could Death’s appearance be the reason I drew these 3 years ago after God made me a prophet 6 years ago when I was 33?
Nobody believed me then, and you still don’t.
Could Deaths appearance to me and then again at the Olympics be fulfillment of this prophecy?
Maybe…..
Could a giant Red Star gone supernova in the Orion constellation be interpreted as a Red Dragon in prophecy?
Crazy?
Or just not retarded?
Let’s see who can riddle this out.
To say those are Angels, Christ has returned before the end of the world and that’s Heaven’s Army would be crazy talk right?
Now what you’re thinking.
“Burn da witch!”
Try.
Anubis Rides with me.
We used sorcery to join souls like Amun and Ra.
Amun Ra is No Second. Amun Ra is second to No One.
Yashua is the No.1 supreme being of the universe.
Jesus Christ has forgiven me for this, it’s sort of how we met, God and Heaven’s Army did not smite me for using sorcery to combine souls with the Grande Vizier of Death.
Neither will you.
We’ll be ones raining down wrath and plagues all over Earth.
I suggest you believe this, and repent.
Or don’t.
Your choice.
Life begins after you die.
THERE IS ONE GOD.
YASHUA.
Asia needs told again.
Thy will be done in Earth as it is done in Heaven.
I am The Son of Man.
And ya.
The cloud said so that’s why.
😂😅🤣😇

Christopher Parks #sexist quora.com

Schopenhauer was extreme but he was right about a lot of things. Women behaving like adult children is one. Whether it’s wining and complaining, the inherent solipsism, the shirking of responsibility for their actions, or the overall lack of an ability to control emotions, women IN GENERAL have a childish mindset which makes sense because women are babied by our society. Obviously not all women but enough to be important enough to bring up in a discussion. Everyone these days are afraid to say anything that can been seen as negative about women because they think they’ll be labeled as misogynist, women haters, and for women “pick me’s”. The truth is women have a tendency to certain flaws just like men have a tendency to certain flaws and as free willed humans we can and I’d even venture to say should work to fix. Schopenhauer does a decent job at pointing them out. Does he seem to have some annimus towards women? Yes. Was he right about a lot of things? Also yes. Both can be true.

Bryan K Starr #fundie #wingnut quora.com

Lol really?

In the leftist corner you have senile Joe, a incredibly corrupt, traitorous, demented, soulless creature who is certainly going to hell.

In the right corner you have Trump, a man who seriously wants to push American values, including Christian values and like many people has his own faults to deal with.

I don't care if Trump cheated on his wife, or sold crack on a corner somewhere back in the 90s.

The question is; who is better for America?

Under Trump we had low prices on everything, secure borders, no dumb wars, etc, etc.

Under Biden it's been the exact opposite and magnified terribly for all of us, you included, and you have the audacity to question why any one would vote for Trump vs Biden?!

Are you retarded?

Bryan K Starr #fundie quora.com

They (atheists) certainly can't understand the Bible, which is strange and more evidence the Bible is the truth.

Many claim a college education and yet cannot comprehend even simple things and concepts in the Bible.

It mixelplixes their brains or something.

That's why you see them say the Bible has thousands of contradictions - except they're not contradictions, they're evidence of the atheists inability to comprehend scripture.

Their whole life is predicated on multiple lies to shield them from the truth.

Abiogenesis, macroevolution, there is no God, etc are the lies they willfully swallow.

The Bible says they are under strong delusion, a consequence of living a lie.

It's incredible.

Bryan K Starr #fundie #pratt #dunning-kruger quora.com

I love the evolutionist stories lol, they're so funny because they're so dumb.

The shrinking pond theory, the hooved dog crocodile turning into a whale because it wanted to swim lol, the apes coming down from the trees because they wanted to walk upright, and the flightless birds that grew wings over millions of years rofl.

Great comedy.

Bryan K Starr #racist #psycho quora.com

You apparently assume that the Palestinians are somehow innocent in all of this.

They are far from innocent, they teach their children to hate and kill Jews, the women also fully support Hamas.

In earlier times any nation would've just wiped them all out.

That's why they should've thought about all this before attacking Israel, but they're stupid Muslims and as usual, are getting their asses kicked for being stupid.

Israel needs to just carpet bomb the whole area and be done with it.

Bryan K Starr #fundie #racist quora.com

You mean Islam.

Hitler admired the fanaticism that Islam provides. These idiots will go kill themselves because they think God told them to.

In theory it is great for warfare, but the muzrats are known for their cowardice and treachery.

They've been getting their ass kicked back and forth for centuries. Greeks, Alexander, Rome, America, whoever.

They make a good fight of it at first but as soon as there's a chance they might lose they break camp and haul ass.

But, with WW2 German soldiers, such fanaticism would've aided the German army very well.

They still wouldn't have won though.

Bryan K Starr #fundie #pratt quora.com

Math is the language of God and doesn't prove evolution at all.

Math says if evolution is true the whole earth would've been overrun with humans long ago.

Math says that the population we have now, 8 billion, can be rewound to come to 8 people who got off a boat.

Math also says there was a y chromosome bottleneck a few thousand yrs ago or so and that we are all from three individuals, namely the sons of Noah.

Math says our sun is special and very rare, just as our moon and planet are equally rare and unique.

Math says way too much as evidence of a Creator Designer.

Bryan Starr #fundie #pratt quora.com

Atheists attack Christianity, and not other religions, because they already know God exists and who He is.

Their irrational anger and hatred is evidence that they know God exists.

Why would anyone be angry at a Being who doesn't exist?

They demand proof when it is literally right in front of them.

The other evidence is that they accept abiogenesis and macroevolution without ever questioning it. Even though there is no evidence for abiogenesis or macroevolution.

Why do they never question abiogenesis and macroevolution?

Because they are the pillars upon which their delusion depends on.

They are already living a lie to begin with, so a few more can't hurt; especially if they support their position, even without evidence.

What a terrible existence for them, is there any wonder they are so angry?

Bryan Starr #fundie #pratt #ableist quora.com

Because atheists' are by definition learning disabled and dullards.

They can't even think that big to begin with. They think the movies Prometheus and Frankenstein are based on true stories.

Now that science is starting to refute Neverbiogenesis and Neverlution they'll be saying it was aliens that are our creators lol.

Anything but God you know.

They always toot their horn that they're so smart while believing that jello came alive one day from a lightning bolt hitting a mud puddle and then the jello compiled its own DNA from nothing and then populated the world with plants and animals lol.

Rofl

Olaf D - "The Men in the Arena" #conspiracy #racist #wingnut #dunning-kruger quora.com

calling one historic tribe Germanic and the other not, is based on what ? Material culture or modern Germany's wishful thinking and nation building myths with supporting historiography.

DNA studies of historic samples blowing these myths apart.

For example suevi or svevi were not what those German pseudo historians would want you believe And people before them knew it very well that.

R1a presence predates R1b on territories from Rhine to Vistula collectively called Germania. Before Catholic crusade to conquer and convert fellow Christians and ostsiedlung.
But we are till present day trapped in this late XIX-th century nationalistic chauvinism designed to grant Germans a historic reign over their imagined lebensraum, by denying peoples (that turned out via genetic testing of today to be by en large the autochtons on the land contrary to German theory making Slavs appearing out of blue from somewhere else, presumably swamp) their history, and right to their homeland.

Bryan Starr #fundie #wingnut quora.com

You have to realize most people are idiots.

Millions of people will vote for Biden even knowing he has basically destroyed the country in 3 yrs, along with his Democrat lackeys.

That's millions of idiots.

So, evolution is also where most of the atheists hide, because they think it means God doesn't exist.

The problem though is that macroevolution and abiogenesis are shot down pretty easily. They're both complete bullshit and imagination.

So, if macroevolution and abiogenesis don't exist what does that leave? God.

You have to be real stupid to think all this just came about by chance.

Ask a evolutionist how invertebrates became vertebrates - ask them for proof.

Ask a evolutionist to show you the transitional fossils between the last whale ancestor and a whale- they will show you a picture of a four legged creature and a picture of a whale- with nothing in-between

Ask a evolutionist to show you proof that abiogenesis is possible- and they won't be able to.

Ask a evolutionist why, after gazillions of generations of fruit flies they've tried to make evolve, none evolved.

Wake up.

Vic Newman #fundie quora.com

Yes, a feeble attempt to understand reality. Creation continues forever, the Earthly creation will end at the End Of “Days” when God sees the Earth as good [the Bible is a predictive book], so creation is a more advanced form of evolution. Aeons [today eons] were spiritual Beings concerned with time as are the “Days.” In ancient times all and everything was the result of spiritual beings. The Catholic Church decided the living universe was a pagan teaching and Catholic scholasticism or science invented the clockwork, mechanical universe.

Science is the gathering of data no more no less. Nothing in science “explains” anything or proves anything, it comes later with the theory-opinions that scientists generate from their imaginations which generate the strong beliefs in science, always keeping to the guidelines of the original dogmas of science that the universe is an accidentally generated clockwork machine in which life and consciousness cannot exist. So somehow in an unknown manner, which science is unable to demonstrate or replicate “scientifically,” life and consciousness appeared.

Which means that matter or the Mineral Kingdom is more intelligent than science as it can produce life and consciousness.

His4Life Dorie #fundie #psycho quora.com

Which prominent atheists do you most look forward to seeing burn in hell?

Personally, I will laugh my damn ass off when that shriveled little deceiver Stephen Hawking touches down in the flames and his diaper starts burning. LOL!

Gary Ayers #wingnut #sexist #dunning-kruger quora.com

Gary Ayers
Then please offer examples and data that prove the existence of The Patriarchy.

I really tend to think that it is like God to the feminists: It is apparently eternal, omiscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. It has been crushing the female sex under its boot for ALL of human history, and yet each generation of feminists believes that THEY will be the generation that will FINALLY destroy it. Even though feminists NEVER have made up more than 7% of the female population of any country at ANY time since their movement began.

Gary Ayers
Oh PLEASE tell me you're not a male feminist. Those are documentedlybthe worst type of men.

Set aside the feminist propaganda for a moment: did you ever consider that maybe there was good reason ancient cultures governed their women and girls in such a way? Maybe with a 60% divorce rate (80%of which initiated by women), a 76% single-parent rate, and a 70%-and-increasing hookup culture participation rate, maybe women are proving they're lousy at picking men? And the rest of your diatribe is about 50 years out of date, isn't it? And if corporations actually could get away with paying women less than a man for the same work, why wouldn't they hire only women? Think how much would be saved on labor costs alone. But that isn't true and you and every other feminist fucking well knows it. And what rights have been taken away from women? Abortion was merely returned to the states to decide as their populations wish. It was not outlawed or “stripped” from women.

Society bends over backwards catering to women now. Show me where men have gotten women thrown in jail on false accusations. Why do women get less prison time than men for the same offense? Why is the entire domestic violence infrastructure built on the feminist Duluth model of sexual power, where the woman is automatically presumed to be the victim in every case of domestic violence, even in cases where it is CLEAR that the man is the victim? Why is sexual behavior in women treated as less serious or explained away when such behavior would be considered reprehensible in men, such as sexual assault of school students?

So just spare us the women are so oppressed schtick. The facts of today's world render it invalid.

Aimee Hudec, StumbleCakes #sexist #transphobia quora.com

Post: “To all the relatives, “friends”, and random ass strangers that have been telling me since I was 16 that being 6’3” made me too tall to wear dresses or find a guy willing to date a girl taller than him: my 5’2” girlfriend loves when I wear dresses, thank you very much.”

StumbleCakes: Idk why, but just ew.

Aimee Hudec: Most women aren’t naturally so tall. But regardless of height, “she” still has male anatomy. That is the real issue.

My respond to Aimee: Biological women can be taller than 6’0 genius.

(My comment was removed for harassment.)

Nifty62 #fundie quora.com

(In response to: Were there stegosaurs (Stegosaurus, Kentrosaurus, etc.) in the biblical Garden of Eden?)

Very unlikely.

The dinosaurs were probably long dead before Adam and Eve came on the scene.

Unlike humans, animals are allowed to either diversify and/or go extinct as the situation occurs. The fossil record shows that all life forms came into existence in very sudden bursts. After that, they largely remain the same with the exception of diversifying within their kind until they eventually go extinct.

This pattern is, interestingly, the exact opposite of what one would expect from an evolutionary standpoint, and precisely what one would expect if they believed in a special creation by an intelligent designer.

Manuel Garoffsen #sexist quora.com

[…]
Unfortunately, that's not so the case with women who are 24 or older. Without being rich, they cannot afford the necessities to be or remain attractive after 24, and said necessities of attractiveness include cosmetic surgery, expensive skincare and makeup products, and gym memberships, all of which are far out of reach for the middle class person. This ultimately means that women who are 24 or older and aren't rich are doomed to be overweight/obese, man-faced, short-haired and/or extremely wrinkly and old-looking. You'd be forgiven for thinking that a woman over 24 you met was a man.
[…]
With so much influence that feminists have, of course men are going to be forced to realize that all the attractive women they they met are only attractive because said women are in the 18–23 range and that they will be ugly once they turn 24 (unless said women are multimillionaires, but then these men will never be able to even talk to them unless said men are multimillionaires as well).

John Smith #racist #psycho #wingnut quora.com

Slaves were given meaning to their pathetic existence. They were given food, shelter, water. They were kept in cool climates. They were treated better than by tribes or muslims. Slaves were also more orderly, since they were not free to throw their shit at each other, like the monkeys that they are. Colonialism in general brought law and order to the subhuman monkeys, who were originally muslims (of course).

Alf Jones #sexist quora.com

Actually women need men a trillion times more than men. Men created civilization, society, democracy and alllll the countless amenities and benefits that jaded, crone, old-bitter-hags enjoy. Men only need women for 1 thing. Women need men for everything. Enjoy!

Varg Vikernes #wingnut #conspiracy quora.com

[Context: he’s talking about Marvel’s portrayal of Thor, both in the comics and the movies]

As a Scandinavian, I feel I can answer this question…

I think theyr portrayal is an attempt to “piss” on our heritage. Nothing less.

Their portrayal of Norse mythology falls in the same vein as everything else they do. They have an agenda, and it’s anti anything European.

Ash Atlanson #moonbat #psycho quora.com

the destruction of the twin towers was the real world equivalent of the destruction of the Death Star.

the World Trade Center was (shockingly) the center of worldwide trade. it housed some of the biggest—and therefore most oppressive and harmful—companies, and most influential capitalists on the planet. luckily on 9/11, around 2,000 scumbag imperialists died in the attacks.

no hero would interfere with those attacks, because the attacks themselves were heroic actions. to quote Leftöver Crack; fuck world trade.

Menno Mafait #fundie #crackpot quora.com

Using fundamental science, I gained knowledge and experience that no one else has:

• I have defined intelligence in a natural way (http://mafait.org/intelligence/);
• I have discovered a logical relationship between natural intelligence and natural language (http://mafait.org/intelligence_in_grammar/);
• I am implementing these laws of intelligence in software, which is published as open source (http://mafait.org/download/);
• And I defy anyone to beat the simplest results of my CNL reasoner (http://mafait.org/challenge/) in a generic way: from natural language, through algorithms, to natural language.

The Laws of Intelligence embedded in Grammar are demonstrated by:

• Programming in natural language (http://mafait.org/screenshots_programming/);
• Reasoning in natural language (http://mafait.org/screenshots_reasoning/):
• drawing conclusions (more advanced than scientific solutions),
• making assumptions (with self-adjusting level of uncertainty),
• asking questions (about gaps in the knowledge),
• detecting conflicts and some cases of semantic ambiguity,
• displaying of justification reports for the self-generated knowledge;
• Multilingualism (http://mafait.org/screenshots/), proving: Natural languages have one common origin.

Menno Mafait #crackpot #fundie quora.com

The invalidation of the theory of evolution as the explanation for the origin of intelligence, language and laws of nature:

• Despite centuries of exhaustive research, the theory of evolution still hasn't provided a satisfactory explanation for the origin of intelligence, language and laws of nature. Let alone, how they are related;
• According to the biblical world view, God has created laws of nature – including laws of intelligence – to make his creation run like clockwork. Being based on Natural Laws of Intelligence embedded in Grammar, only Thinknowlogy implements the intelligent function of words like definite article “the”, conjunction “or”, possessive verb “has/have” and past tense verbs “was/were” and “had”. Other Controlled Natural Language (CNL) reasoners are limited to sentences with present tense verb “is/are”. They don't accept the words mentioned above.

I am using fundamental science instead of cognitive science:

• Autonomous reasoning requires both intelligence and language;
• Intelligence and language are natural phenomena;
• Natural phenomena obey laws of nature;
• Laws of nature (and logic) are investigated using fundamental science (Basic research - Wikipedia).

Menno Mafait #crackpot quora.com

Were Cro-Magnons smarter than current humans?

Cro-Magnon, Neanderthal, and so on, have never existed.

None of the hypotheses that are related to Darwin's common descent /Tree of Life hypothesis can be applied to daily life. So, none of these hypotheses is scientifically proven.

Theo Tsourdalakis #fundie #dunning-kruger #pratt quora.com

What role does our Neanderthal ancestry play in our aggression today?

zero role.

What exactly do you think Neanderthals were?

Humans have always been human.

Neanderthals is part of the macro evolution myth which is devoid of credible scientific evidence.

Evolutionists have a vivid IMAGINATION but are really poor on credible scientific evidence.

Dr John Sanford (Geneticist and inventor of the Gene Gun) said :

“The bottom line

is that the primary axiom [of Darwinian/Macro evolution]

is categorically false,

you can't create information with misspellings,

not even if you use natural selection.”

Dr Ben Carson; ex Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery at one of the world's greatest hospitals (John Hopkins), a groundbreaking surgeon, best-selling author, and recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom said:

"I think one of the most damning pieces of evidence against evolution is the human genome.

You can see that you have very complex, sophisticated coding mechanisms for different amino acids, and various sequences that give you millions of different genetic instructions -- very much like computer programming, which uses a series of zeros and ones in different sequences, but gives you very specific information about what that computer is to do."

Subho Deep Thakur #wingnut #fundie quora.com

[Context, for those that don’t know or remember, basically Hindutva is hindu fascism. Think of it as the indian counterpart of the USA evangelist fundie.]

Hindutva is a wrong narrative put up by some people against the Islamo-Marxist narrative. It is a conditional secularism. The Islamo-Marxists wants it to be unconditional so that they can meet their prerogative to break the norms of Indian culture. And they shall achieve it by demonizing Hindu values.

Hindutva is a counter to such low mentalities.

Next page