FSTDT

THE GUNPOWDER PLOT!!

REMEMBER, REMEMBER, THE FIFTH OF NOVEMBER, THE GUNPOWDER TREASON AND PLOT!!

Guy Fawkes is the father of all modern day suicide bombers and terrorists. His Gunpowder Plot is also the inspiration for all present day false flag operations.

On November 5, 1605, Fawkes and his Jesuit co-conspirators planned to decapitate the entire English government.

Until recently, the discovery of the Plot was widely celebrated In Britain.

During the long reign of Sultana Elizabeth I, the Jesuits worked closely with King Philip II of Spain to return England to Babylonian bondage. That strategy of invasion from without led to the "Invincible" Spanish Armada of 1588.

During the long reign of Sultana Elizabeth I, official British government policy was to embrace Islam as a counterweight to Spanish worldwide hegemony.

The "Invincible" Spanish Armada of 1588 failed miserably, and subsequent Spanish invasion attempts also failed.

With the ascension of King James I, a completely new strategy emerged!

Camillo Burghese became Pope Paul V in June 1605. He was one of the most fanatical Popes to ever wear the banned triple crown in Roma.

He canonized Ignatius Loyola, co-founder of the Jesuits, and Charles Borromeo.

He issued a plenary indulgence (license to kill) to all who participated in the Gunpowder Plot, and said that they were doing a "holy work most pleasing to God."

The changing face of Guy Fawkes!!

People like to see new faces, but unlike Hillary Digby Churchill Clinton, most people have only one face throughout their lifetime.

Even Guy Fawkes has undergone a metamorphoses and is now known as "Anonymous."

When the Pilgrim Fathers planted Israel in the Wilderness, they continued celebrating November 5, but they called it "Pope Day." George Washington abolished the celebration because he claimed that it offended his new Papal French allies.

The Jesuits have run out of options . . . so expect a "big bang" in the U.S.

Beginning with the new millennium, the Jesuits opted for a new 3-pronged strategy:

Install a Jesuit White Pope in the Vatican.
Install a Jesuit Chief Justice in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Install a Jesuit President in the White House.
The new millennium dawned with the Militia of Jesus as aggressive as ever.

In February 2001, the ailing Pope John Paul II made Jorge Bergoglio a cardinal.

He also named Bergoglio as his successor.

In March 2005, Cardinal Bergoglio was absolutely sure he would be the first Jesuit White Pope.

He would have taken the name Pius XIII.

Before the conclave, "anonymous" distributed images of Bergoglio blessing the Argentine troops prior to the invasion of the Falkland Islands. "Anonymous" is just a synonym for the British Secret Service:

No one admitted to sending the email. The ambassador said he did not do it. So did the lawyer. So did the journalist. So did several high ranking officials of the Society of Jesus, the world's biggest and most powerful religious order. The dossier that dropped anonymously in the in box of senior cardinals as they gathered at Rome was damning. Or so it was intended to be. Someone did not want Jorge Mario Bergoglio to be Pope. (Vallely, Pope Francis: Untying the Knots, p. 1).

Even though the "Iron Lady" was out of office since 1990, she was still hugely influential in governmental circles. They all remembered the Falklands War, and they were not about to have any Argentine as Pope.

After an intense struggle that lasted from 2005 to 2013, Bergoglio finally forced Pope Benedict XVI to resign. Only a month later, Margaret "Iron Lady" Thather—the woman who torpedoed Bergoglio in 2005—was sent to meet her Maker.

However, by 2013, it was too late for Bergoglio to achieve most of the objectives of the Jesuits.
The second option was Jesuit Antonin Scalia as Chief Justice!!

n October 2004, Chief Justice Rehnquist was suddenly diagnosed with terminal "throat cancer."

The heroic chief justice refused to resign; and, despite the pain and discomfort, he remained in office until his death in September 2005.

His timely death was the opportunity that Scalia had waited for all his life.

Scalia was sure that he would be the next chief justice. He was 69-years-old at that time, but judges are appointed for life, and he could have counted on at least another 15 years as Chief Justice.

By remaining on the Court until his death, Chief Justice Rehnquist changed the course of history.

By Sept. 2005, George W. Bush was besieged by the Iraq War and Hurricane Katrina.

He bypassed Scalia, and chose the less controversial Judge Roberts Instead.

Scalia remained on the Court until his timely death in February 2016. Many people suspected FOWL play in his death because he died on a hunting trip to Texas. It is possible that he was another victim of the "Clinton Body Count" because they did not want a repeat of the 2000 Florida Fiasco.

His death ended the second option of the Jesuits to make one of their own a Chief Justice of the United States.

The third option was Jesuit Hillary Digby Churchill Harriman Clinton as President!!

The 2016 election between Donald Trump and Hillary Digby Churchill Harriman Clinton was as critical as the 2000 election. Prior to the election, Scalia was sent to meet his Maker, so that nothing could hinder a Democratic victory.

It is almost beyond belief but Hillary Clinton was a physical descendant of Gunpowder Plotter Sir Everard Digby.

The banned Jesuits are still very, very proud of the names Guy Fawkes and Sir Everard Digby

You cannot fool Father Time, and despite several face lifts, Hillary was still 69-years-old in 2016.

In modern times the Presidential race is decided by televised debates, so the real Hillary had to employ the same experienced doppelgänger debater that she used in 2000.

Despite the Harriman and Rockefeller billions, and an experienced youthful debater, Hillary lost the election.

That ended the third and last option for a Jesuit takeover of the United States of Israel.

In the great American pastime of baseball, the rule is: 3 strikes and you are out....However, the "big bang" Jesuits do not play by the rules, and we cannot expect them to obey the 1773 Papal Bull of Suppression....That is why it is vitally important to Make America Christian again by reinstating November 5 as "Pope Day."

Atheists are genetic mutants who, for the most part, would never have been born if we hadn’t managed to break free of pre-industrial conditions of Darwinian selection. This was the conclusion of a paper published just before Christmas in the leading journal Evolutionary Psychological Science[The Mutant Says in His Heart, “There Is No God”: The Rejection of Collective Religiosity Centred Around the Worship of Moral Gods is Associated with High Mutational Load Edward Dutton, Guy Madison & Curtis Dunkel. (PDF).] and it sent establishment psychologists into spasms of rage.

To be sophisticated, these days, means that you’re an atheist. Academia is overwhelmingly atheist and average intelligence weakly correlates with not believing in God [High IQ turns academics into atheists,’ Times Higher Education, byRebecca Atwood, June 12, 2008]. For SJWs, the religious are at best stupid and, at worst, racist bigots who vote for Donald Trump and Brexit. So it’s no surprise that the paper was greeted with disbelief by the SJWs who fill departments of psychology.

Reactions ranged from “Amazing!” to condemning it as the worst paper of the year and “one of the most egregious papers I’ve ever read.” Reported in newspapers worldwide [Atheists more likely to be left handed, study finds, by Olivia Rudgard,Daily Telegraph, December 21, 2017], its authors presumably delighted in the reaction.

And the reaction was all the more ferocious because the paper’s conclusions are difficult to dispute. The researchers—British anthropologist Dr Edward Dutton, Swedish psychologist Prof. Guy Madison and Western Illinois University psychologist Curtis Dunkel—presented a beautifully simple case:

Until the Industrial Revolution, we were under harsh conditions of Darwinian Selection, meaning that about 40% of children died before they reached adulthood. These children would have been those who had mutant genes, leading to poor immune systems and death from childhood diseases. But they would also have had mutant genes affecting the mind. This is because the brain, home to 84% of the genome, is extraordinarily sensitive to mutation, so mental and physical mutation robustly correlate. If these children had grown up, they might have had autism, schizophrenia, depression... but they had poor immune systems, so they never had the chance.

Under these conditions, prevalent until the nineteenth century, we were individually selected for but we were also “group selected” for. Ethnic groups are simply a genetic extended family and some groups fared better against the environment and enemy groups than others did, due to the kind of partly genetic psychological adaptations they developed.

Among these, the authors argue, was a very specific kind of religiosity which developed in all complex societies: the collective worship of gods concerned with morality. Belief in these kinds of gods was selected for, they maintain, because once we developed cities we had to deal with strangers—people who weren’t part of our extended family. By conceiving of a god who demanded moral behaviour towards other believers, people were compelled to cooperate with these strangers, meaning that large, highly cooperative groups could develop.

Computer models have proven that the more internally cooperative group—which is also hostile to infidel outsiders—wins the battle of group selection [The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation by Max Hartshorn, June 2013]. This very specific kind of religiousness was selected for and, indeed, it correlates with positive and negative ethnocentrism even today.

The authors demonstrate that this kind of religiousness has clearly been selected for in itself. It is about 40% genetic according to twin studies, it is associated with strongly elevated fertility, it can be traced to activity in specific regions of the brain, and it is associated with elevated health: all the key markers that something has been selected for.

And it is from here that the authors make the leap that has made SJW blood boil. Drawing on research by Michael Woodley of Menie and his team (see here and here)they argue that conditions of Darwinian selection have now massively weakened, leading to a huge rise in people with damaging mutations. This is evidenced in increasing rates of autism, schizophrenia, homosexuality, sex-dysmorphia, left-handedness, asymmetrical bodies and much else. These are all indicators of mutant genes.

Woodley suggests that weakened Darwinian selection would have led to the spread of “spiteful mutations” of the mind, which would help to destroy the increasingly physically and mentally sick group, even influencing the non-carriers to behave against their genetic interests, as carriers would help undermine the structures through which members learnt adaptive behaviour.

This is exactly what happened in the infamous Mouse Utopia experiment in the late 1960s, where a colony of mice was placed in conditions of zero Darwinian selection and eventually died out. [Death squared: The explosive growth and demise of a mouse population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, January 1973(PDF)].

So Dutton and his team argue that, this being the case, deviation from this very specific form of religiousness—the collective worship of moral gods in which almost everyone engaged in 1800—should be associated with these markers of mutation. In other words, both atheists and those interested in spirituality with no moral gods (such as the paranormal) should be disproportionately mutants.

And this is precisely what they show. Poor physical and mental health are both significantly genetic and imply high mutational load. Dutton and his team demonstrate that this specific form of religiousness, when controlling for key factors such as SES, predicts much better objective mental and physical health, recovery from illness, and longevity than atheism.

It’s generally believed that religiousness makes you healthier because it makes you worry less and elevates your mood, but they turn this view on its head, showing that religious worshippers are more likely to carry gene forms associated with being low in anxiety. Schizophrenia, they show, is associated with extreme and anti-social religiosity, rather than collective worship. Similarly, belief in the paranormal is predicted by schizophrenia, and this is a marker of genetic mutation.

Next, they test autism, another widely accepted marker of mutation, as evidenced by the fact that it’s more common among the children of older men, whose fathers are prone to mutant sperm. Autism predicts atheism.

They then look at data on left-handedness. In agricultural societies we are overwhelmingly right-handed. Left-handedness means an asymmetrical brain and thus, to some extent, mutation. They show that there is a weak but significant trend whereby the more strongly religious you are the more likely you are to be right-handed, just as the theory would predict. Finally, they turn to plain ugliness—asymmetry. This shows that your immune system is so deficient that you haven’t been able to maintain a symmetrical phenotype in the face of disease or that you simply have mutant genes that make you asymmetrical. Believers in the paranormal have less symmetrical hands than do controls.

...

Dutton & Co.’s research is so incendiary because it is presenting the SJWs with what they really are: mutants; maladapted people who undermine carefully evolved, evolutionarily useful structures—such as religion—meaning they make even non-carriers maladapted; discouraging them from breeding or from defending their ethnic group.

Under normal Darwinian conditions, prevalent until the Industrial Revolution, these mutants would simply never have been born. They are, just like the mutant mice, people whose influence will ultimately lead to the collapse of society, as intelligence declines, and we return to a new Dark Age in which people are likely to be very religious indeed.

But perhaps there is some good news. It’s quite clear from the Mouse Utopia experiments that if the mutants are removed, then the society will recover.