new

Doomsday Plane coming from Philippines with official Call Sign…

“Biden” in “D.C.” with Closed Pressers.

The E-4B aka Doomsday Plane with official Call Sign means it’s not “training” especially over the big pond.

It’s on official business. It’s the National Command Authority that carries the President, the Secretary of Defense, and successors.

They are modified for the National Emergency Airborne Command Post.

The National Command Authority = ultimate source of lawful military orders.

That term was replaced in 2002 in favor of explicitly referring to the president and/or secretary of defense.

What a coincidence… 2001… 2002… a whole whopping year, we remove the term NCA and just give sole power to President and SECDEF…
<...>
So, you intercept the 2030 Agenda by the democrats / liberals / fascists / socialists / marxists / progressives, especially since a majority of that population has no clue what they “believe” in will be doom…

You reverse tactics by using the Laws and Orders on paper as prescribed as they were written to reset us on our Foundation that supports the Founders just as they wrote in the Declaration of Independence.

That’s why MANY people look ignorant and dumb because the Constitution is a Framework that outlines what the Congress, President, and Vice President’s roles are and what they have the authority and power to do.
<...>
They clearly do not know much about the Constitution, the Military, Military History, Wartime Powers of the President, and Military Laws and Orders and how they pair with Federal Legislation, as legislators have put into place LONG before President Donald John Trump.

In Executive Order 13919, WPDJT, Directed the SecDef to Order Selected Reserves to Active-Duty.

The Secretary of Defense is 2nd in line under President over Military.

That EO has a Direct Order giving SecDef equal authority to Federalize to Active-Duty.

That EO has not been revoked or revised.

Military Occupation.

45–47

I was on a radio talk program once when a caller asked, “Where did Cain get his wife?” I answered saying Cain’s wife was his sister. The next caller identified himself as an atheist and said, “If you believe that it’s incest and it’s immoral.” I’ve heard many atheists make that accusation over the years.

First, an atheist can’t make a moral judgment like that. If it was truly incest as we understand the word today, then why is incest immoral from an atheist’s perspective anyway? If there’s no God, no absolute authority, then “right” and “wrong” are subjective and can’t be treated as moral absolutes. Also, from an atheist evolutionist’s perspective, humans are just evolved animals, so they could have sexual relationships with anyone (or any animal) as there’s no such thing as marriage (or you define it any way you want), and morality is relative. And yet atheists try to claim Christians have a moral problem with Cain’s wife being his sister! They can’t see their own inconsistencies.

Now the word incest wasn’t even invented until the thirteenth century. It’s a modern word. But doesn’t the Bible forbid marriage between close relations? It does, but the laws against marrying family members were initially given as part of the Mosaic covenant, approximately 2,500 years after God created Adam and Eve. Due in part to genetic mistakes, these laws were necessary to help protect offspring from mutations shared by both parents.

In today’s world, close relations (e.g., brother and sister) marrying would be incest. But originally, there would have been no problem with it. Looking back through history, the closer we get to Adam and Eve, the fewer genetic mistakes people would have, so it would have been safer for close relatives to marry and have children.

Remember, we’re all one race, one family, all descendants of Adam and Eve. So we are all related. When you marry (one man for one woman), you marry your relation. We just don’t marry a close relation today.
8:52 PM · Jun 23, 2024 · 12.2K Views
[b[37 Reposts 3 Quotes 168 Likes 26 Bookmarks