The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters
Women never let you out in traffic.
If you let them out they don’t say thank you.
They just take your gift without acknowledgement while staring dead ahead with a face of arrogance and slight panic attempting to drive a car without hitting a tree.
Everything is given to females by men and they appreciate none of it.
Selfish.
12:34 AM · Feb 25, 2026 · 119.3K Views
The male `artist' attempts to solve his dilemma of not being able to live, of not being female, by constructing a highly artificial world in which the male is heroized, that is, displays female traits, and the female is reduced to highly limited, insipid subordinate roles, that is, to being male.
The male `artistic' aim being, not to communicate (having nothing inside him he has nothing to say), but to disguise his animalism, he resorts to symbolism and obscurity (`deep' stuff). The vast majority of people, particularly the `educated' ones, lacking faith in their own judgment, humble, respectful of authority (`Daddy knows best'), are easily conned into believing that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, ambiguity and boredom are marks of depth and brilliance.
`Great Art' proves that men are superior to women, that men are women, being labeled `Great Art', almost all of which, as the anti-feminists are fond of reminding us, was created by men. We know that `Great Art' is great because male authorities have told us so, and we can't claim otherwise, as only those with exquisite sensitivities far superior to ours can perceive and appreciated the slop they appreciated.
The male, having a very limited range of feelings, and consequently, very limited perceptions, insights and judgments, needs the `artist' to guide him, to tell him what life is all about. But the male `artist' being totally sexual, unable to relate to anything beyond his own physical sensations, having nothing to express beyond the insight that for the male life is meaningless and absurd, cannot be an artist. How can he who is not capable of life tell us what life is all about? A `male artist' is a contradiction in terms. A degenerate can only produce degenerate `art'. The true artist is every self-confident, healthy female, and in a female society the only Art, the only Culture, will be conceited, kooky, funky, females grooving on each other and on everything else in the universe.
Leisure time horrifies the male, who will have nothing to do but contemplate his grotesque self. Unable to relate or to love, the male must work. Females crave absorbing, emotionally satisfying, meaningful activity, but lacking the opportunity or ability for this, they prefer to idle and waste away their time in ways of their own choosing -- sleeping, shopping, bowling, shooting pool, playing cards and other games, breeding, reading, walking around, daydreaming, eating, playing with themselves, popping pills, going to the movies, getting analyzed, traveling, raising dogs and cats, lolling about on the beach, swimming, watching TV, listening to music, decorating their houses, gardening, sewing, nightclubbing, dancing, visiting, `improving their minds' (taking courses), and absorbing `culture' (lectures, plays, concerts, `arty' movies).
So… from a biological stand point, why should incels have sex? Why should ugly, misshapen, short, fat, mentally ill men have sex? Nobody wants those kind of genes. Nobody wants to hand down that kind of person to their offspring. There is no reason why those kind of men should even have partners. It happens in nature. The unfit ones that the females aren't interested in enough for whatever reason die off and there's natural selection for you. Incels should just kill themselves.
Everything men do is an adaptation. Absolutely nothing they do is truly altruistic or for the benefit of anyone other than themselves. Women are universally ashamed of pursuing overt self interest, which automatically puts them at a disadvantage.
Liberal men are (for one reason or another) not built to sexually succeed in a right wing environment. Right wing men cannot thrive in a liberal society. Both of them are after male interests only. Typically, commies want women to be public property and nazis want women to be private property.
This is partially why any nationalist (or Marxist, or any other "inclusive" branch) feminism is ineffective. If you're advancing the interests of a nation, you're advancing the interests of male tribal hierarchy. That's exactly what happened to black women's earnest desire to uplift black people as a whole - their efforts amounted to helping black men expand their sexual opportunities. Any seemingly good ideology that includes both men and women can and will be appropriated by men to benefit mostly men.
[From “No deal available for men and women to have a life together”]
Marriage 1.0 is now illegal, and there is no alternative with which to form a family that is legal and socially acceptable in polite company
Love is war, love is a battlefield, all is fair in love and war
Marriage 2.0 does not work. A ship must have one captain, and a household one captain, and if you have two captains you have two ships, which wind up passing in the night
Young men view young women as icky and broken, and young women view young men as — well they just don’t see them at all, because almost all young males are lower status than almost any young woman[…]Miss average wants to fuck mister one in thirty, this is the new and worse problem that when miss average is pushing thirty years old and thirty pounds overweight[…]
For men, it is much simpler. Most men don’t get pussy, and if they do the juice is not worth the squeeze. Does he want miss average thirty year old and thirty pounds overweight?
But wait. Some men, some social groups, and some nations are still successfully reproducing. Not many, but definitely some[…]
If you look at population groups that do it, the key factor is that the girls during puberty are attending a school that teaches old type religion, in which God commands marriage 1.0[…]
If you look at nations that do it, the state religion is not progressivism, nor a nominally deistic religion converged to “the arc of history”, it is an old type deistic religion[…]
If you look at individual males that do it, the key factor is that under their roofs they are King and High Priest[…]
If you look at female erotic fantasies, they are mostly rape fantasies, or rape fantasies rather thinly disguised as not-quite-rape fantasies[…]
Marriage 1.0, decribed above in quotes from the bible, is everywhere illegal and subject to strong disapproval[…]
Reproduction requires cooperation. Cooperation requires enforcement, and the only deal that works is illegal
Forcing women into the workforce was the start of the destruction of everything we hold dear.
Oh, women "gamers" huh, let me guess, they will focus on inclusion and diversity and lame ass social justice grandstanding over anything fun, engaging, unique, innovative, or worthwhile.
Can't wait for AI to reach the point where anybody can get a custom curated game via prompts. Sick of being told what to think by liberal women who think they have the moral high ground, byt also think murdering babies is their right (more kills mind you than men have killed in all wars, ever, combined)
And we have nobody to blame but weak men for pushing for this.
Since feminism - women spend 99% of their time trying to get money off another woman’s husband.
5:47 AM · Feb 20, 2026 · 271.3K Views
Women exist for sex. That is why they are mothers, or they are whores, or they are nuns. End of list. Women are either mothers, whores, or nuns. No other options. There are no female philosophers. There are no female inventors. There are no female generals or billionaires. They are mothers, whores, nuns. End of list. That's what you can be.
[…]
So fuck feminism, feminism must be eradicated from the earth, and yes, age of consent ideology has to go with it.
The law of the land is marriage. When are women going to be getting married? That's the question. I don't believe in age of consent, I believe in age of marriage. When is it licit? When does it make sense for a woman to get married? And I think that age has nothing to do with age of consent. So feminism must be utterly annihilated and destroyed, all of it, every vestige of it, the whole rape culture bullshit, the hysteria over this sort of thing.
> I'm of the opinion that trying to be the bigger person only serves the moids and makes you the ultimate pickme. Only be exclusive when you're getting the best possible deal. If he's cheating, it's perfectly fine for you to cheat too.
While you're out there clinging to the female exclusivity meme, your moid is preparing to install Tinder, Bumble and PlentyOfFish the moment you get pregnant. The money that you faithfully contribute towards his rent goes to Belle Delphine's cuckreon.
> Obviously men are sexually useless, but some women still want PIV so it would be a "benefit" for her I suppose. Obviously anyone can branch out for other things they feel they're missing.
Don't get me wrong, I fully agree that moids are overall not worth your time because nature made it so you only lose by getting involved with them (while moids only gain). In a perfect world, not bothering to tard wrangle them would be the most efficient thing to do.
But most women in the world are straight and still desire male company to some extent, or simply unable to cut contact with all scrots due to circumstances. While there's no way to eliminate these women's losses, they can be somewhat minimized.
> Beautiful men are a rarity. That's the reality that no one wants to admit. And those rare beautiful men are hated because they show how ugly the average moid is. Masculinity is just ugliness rebranded.
> And here's the part no one is ready for: while the baseline ugliness of males is elevated due to resource coercion, (comparatively) beautiful males would still be a minority due to the fundamental premise of mammalian sexual dimorphism - only a few select males are meant to breed. Long term pair bonding and inclusion of sexually mature males in the family unit are unnatural and harmful to genetic quality in the long run. This is likely a result of adult males adapting to "farm" female maternal attachment to make it encompass themselves.
If resource coercion didn't exist, high mutation rate and innate genetic "defectiveness" of males would probably still produce 90% of (relative) subhumans and 10% of breedables.
> Appearance is the absolute measure of genetic quality, which in turn is a measure of health
They sent in a helicopter and 20 armed agents, as though she were a menace to society. It was unbelievable, totally shocking. That was the moment my sister became a scapegoat for the dreadful crimes perpetrated by Jeffrey Epstein.
My sister left her home and went to New Hampshire to escape the media, not the police. After Epstein died, the press hounded her 24/7, so she fled to get away from them.
My sister is the fall guy. Somebody had to pay the price for what Epstein did and so the government and the media chose her. I genuinely believe that if Epstein were alive he would be incarcerated and she would be free.
Her trial wasn’t fair and her conviction isn’t safe. Ghislaine has done nothing wrong and the length of her conviction is outrageous. You have a situation where somebody like P Diddy stands in front of the same federal court on the same charge and receives four-and-a-half years for extreme physical battery and my sister receives 20 years.
I know who the monster is here and it’s not my sister, it’s Virginia Giuffre and her falsehoods that have had devastating ramifications for Ghislaine. I didn’t shed a tear when she died.
I was reading the pages about the child sex trauma myth and found them interesting. I had initially thought the same thing about female rape in that western women are conditioned from cradle to grave to believe that rape is the worst thing that could possibly happen to them and if it happened, then they would be immediately traumatized by it, no questions asked. The scientifically documented nocebo effect.
“In one experiment, asthmatic patients breathed in a vapor that researchers told them was a chemical irritant or allergen. Nearly half of the patients experienced breathing problems, with a dozen developing full-blown attacks. They were “treated” with a substance they believed to be a bronchodilating medicine, and recovered immediately. In actuality, both the “irritant” and the “medicine” were a nebulized saltwater solution.”*
NOTE: (Reviewing one episode of Malcolm in the Middle)
An amazing mother. Made her sons SUFFER for the good of humanity. Boy moms have never done greater. 3,5. Could have done better for her DIL, but at least the son she punished made an not indicent husband.
"Why does he do that" author said abusive mothers made better sons too.
Takes: men are evil in their impulses and should not be trusted. Women need to prepare ammunitions and know about every single tofana way and emotionally detach from all men, including sons. And that the taliban will create a fail state that will never recover.
If the west represents the feminine, and it doesn't, then the feminine is vastly superior than the unfemine or if you prefer, according to your own construction, the masculine. The masculine is death, degradation, humiliation, and evil. Sometimes evil wins.
Plot 1 — Most stories are Dude-Gets-Chick Stories. These are basically tips on how-to-bullshit-your-way-into-a-receptive-host. Spanning every genre, these stories end when dude scores wide-eyed babe because Y Mission Accomplished. The dude-written stories females get from cradle-onwards – Fairytales — also end when Chick Gets Got. Chick Happiness = Getting Got. – No time wasted planting that bullshit in developing XX minds. And why is Prince with Ballet Company carriage the special one? Dudes aren’t special. According to Hunt Willard, an XX researcher from Duke University: “Genetically speaking, if you’ve met one man, you’ve met them all. We are, I hate to say it, predictable. You can’t say that about women. Men and women are farther apart then we ever knew. It’s not Mars or Venus. It’s Mars or Venus, Pluto, Jupiter and who knows what other planets.” Women are interchangeable is a Male Reversal. Men are interchangeable. If you’ve met one Marsprince, you’ve met them all. Getting “got” by some interchangeable Marsprince is suppose to make the female eternally happy. Happily-ever-after is so not like life in a box, isolated and trapped with a PIV-demanding dude and screaming offspring. Though don’t ever tell females. You want a chick in a box? — Tell females Fairytales.
Romance/Romantic Comedies are Fairytales for grown-women. Fed this bullshit already, and given the limited menu, women eat this stupid shit up, because at least there’s some connection portrayed. Which works well, cuz the Y needs women to believe dudes are capable of connection. For dudes, simulating connection is usually just another con, employed towards dickery/Y success. These “romance” stories are vampire-host-demos, sometimes literally, as the vampire motif gets a redo each generation, cuz apparently, deep down, — rings true. Romance/Romantic Comedies also serve dude as “date movies,” — doing all the softening-up-the-chick work before dude drives her home. (“If I could just stop picking the wrong guys. What is the matter with me? I just need to find the right one. Roberto seems nice.)” One step beyond how-to-bullshit-your-way-into-a-receptive-host to: Here, let us salt her neck.
the right treats rape and pedophilia as something caused by immigrant men.
the left treats rape and pedophilia as something caused by “rich, evil white men”.
yet in virtually every single fucking society globally, it’s *men* who commit 90%+ (i’m being generous here) of rape and pedophilia.
rich men, poor men. brown men. black men. white men. immigrants. non-immigrants. religious men. atheists. straight men. bi men. gay men. trans-identified men. BOYS.
MEN ARE THE FUCKING PROBLEM.
KILL ALL MEN.
You know what species of females that almost always gets their way? Birds. Smart, beautiful, majestic, free, social, involved and considerate parents both male and female. Everyone love birds, most not knowing the reason they love birds is because female birds made them lovable. Everyone hates bedbugs. Bedbugs are bedbugs because bedbug moids made them what they are. Moids only know how to breed in hate. Moids make themselves reprehensible, to themselves, to their females, to their offspring, even to other species. Reject male choice TODAY. Deny a male his autonomy TODAY. They will only ever drag you to hell if you do not. Judge and shit test these moids RIGHT NOW. They will turn your granddaughters of the future into bedbugs, and no I am NOT KIDDING. You owe it to your granddaughters. Tolerate no nonsense from these creatures. In fact, make their lives HARDER. You may be anxious at the idea of it after years and years of buckbreaking attempts and propaganda, but it is actually ENJOYABLE to be a bitch for a great cause. Possibly the most enjoyable experience on earth. Be BRAVE and be FREE. Look at this bird. Your granddaughters deserve the life of a bird. If you cannot do it for you, do it for HER.
[From “Neoreaction”]
We act in the realm of ideas. How do ideas get translated into concrete actions?
Groups of men coordinate under a strong leader and on ideas[…]
Reaction failed because it had no ideas, other than “we want our applecarts back” and “we want our unprincipled exceptions back”[…]
Moldbug’s big idea was that the rule of law was a pretence covering the rule of priests, and that the leadership should blow off the priests. President Trump just sank “the rules based order”, which has governed international relations since 1948[…]
Of course we have gone beyond Moldbug in several important ways, the big ideas being that the state priesthood is demonic, and that the woman problem needs to be addressed[…]
Trump has taken some small steps against the state priesthood[…]though these steps are far, far short, of what is needed. What is needed is tanks in Harvard[…]
Moldbugs big idea was to blow off the priesthood and rule without them[…]
Pete Hegseth just took decisive action to install a friendly priesthood within the military
The woman problem remains unaddressed[…]But the influencers are now speaking of it. Now we hear people saying “repeal the nineteenth”
There is a whole lot of talk about young men becoming radicalized — of course they are not becoming radicalized. Their political position is, like Trump, much the same as it has been since the 1980s. It is young women who are becoming radicalised, as society fails their shit tests collectively and individually[…]
Observe that women reading “Dark Romance”, porn for women set in a world where they become absolute property of dangerous, violent, and powerful males, are primarily radical libtard women[…]
What just happened in Minneapolis, when Jonathan Ross shot Renée Good, was a decisive step towards warrior rule. A warrior, with the backing of his chain of command, just shot a priestess, who had the backing of her chain of command[…]
Well, Pete is attempting to act on it
23 year old girls are fun and full of life.
33 year old girls complain moan and are boring - even if they still look great.
Even worse, the 33 year old whos boring was fun for someone else when 23.
Age isnt about looks.
Men want positivity in a hard life.
Thats a womans job
7:52 AM · Feb 17, 2026 · 666.8K Views
The modern vs past male dichotomy is rooted in romanticized, idealistic, pastoral Disney-trad fantasy that has nothing to do with reality. The percentage of "genius pioneer" males has always been vanishingly small, the amount of degenerates absurdly high, and the "role" males fulfill in society is largely artificial, carved by them to maintain proximity and relevance. Males know that women can do something they can't while the reverse isn't true, so they had to make it "fair" by nurturing the pussy-envy myth of uniquely male ingenuity, the idea that they too can create something the other sex can't, which thus makes them just as irreplaceable and essential.
The modern male is becoming discouraged and catatonic because this artificial niche is dissolving - in the past (after all the role reversal fantasies about women's original sin and inherent sexual degeneracy have fallen flat) he could proudly say "yes, we are responsible for the vast majority of all atrocities and human misery, but at least we invent stuff sometimes, that's the price you have to pay for it because no one else can do it!". Today he has to watch women do everything only he is supposed to be capable of, yet somehow without the "toll" of war and crime. The artificial niche is crumbling, and so the obsolescence panic increases. The male retreats into self destructive hedonism and an ever widening pit of omnipotent desirability fantasies. You have correctly observed that these fantasies grow more pathetic and extreme as males lose their real world "importance", and that is because porn is a cope - sexualized of course, like everything males feel.
(@verderebb): I did say once that everything goes downhill in society whenever male nerds are given too much power. Male autism and male nerditry are the Satan of this world.
(@milletnika): They are bio-robots, devoid of soul, of any connection to life, unleashing Black Mirror horrors beyond comprehension while prizing the impeccable "LoGIc and rEAson" of their demented judgement, oblivious to the fact that they are sick, hollow, twisted creatures from the void.
Until women actually start holding their life-creating power for ransom, this shit will continue. "Prove yourself worthy or have your bloodline end" should be the approach. This is an actual use for the upper body strength and testosterone. What we have now is perversion.
Exactly. The most feverish adherents of the patriarchy are the ugliest, weakest most pathetic creatures under the sun who know in their bones that in a fair world their bloodline would be wiped out eons ago. As parasites, this is their only strategy for survival.
And by having to prove themselves and face actual dangers and challenges, men would actually enact their heroes journey fantasies and earn real laurels. But they don't want real challenges, cause they know they're weak. They want to conquer pixels and fight pickle jars. Pathetic.
This is also why the males love to call the fake world "the matrix" (matrice, mother) when in reality the fake delusion is the patrix and they hate the fact they were given birth to by a mother and have her mitochondrial dna 😭 but they'll slap their fake last names and God LOrD
> And I've been recently thinking so much about the real "matrix" as an ontological All-mother of reality and "patrix" that we live in, and it's carnivorous parasitism. And here you are talking about Her being destroyed, while my timeline is "tr*ns-trump-trump-tr*ns" you know?
> There's also something to be said about the whole gnostic aspect of it, only without, you know, ties to any particular religion. Just this idea of false parasitic force that extracts from us what it can't create. Demiurgic sort of parasitism of this collective male.
> Also, to me the whole discourse about males beyond this topic is very boring. I think that once you see it clearly, there is no point to keep looking at it. It is far more important to me to find HER, than to keep looking at these vampires and what they do. My focus is on Her.
> I just have a deep yearning for Her, for finding my way back to Her. Like a person in a desert dying of thirst, I'm always looking for these little water droplets. I remember getting obsessed with goddess figurines had hyper-real dreams of this cosmic All-mother and her truth
> Ultimately, male and male-created narratives do not exist for me. I don't find them significant enough to engage. I wouldn't let a pig teach me about purity. So I have to find what they've destroyed and taken from us. It's like remembering the stolen language and trying to speak.
> I think that the problem lies in treating them seriously and so considering their opinions and ideas. To me it's just hilarious, like a talking little tapeworm. "Look it thinks it's people". So I take precautions to avoid the harms, but to me, it's like dealing with insects.
The next best thing is for him to latch on to a woman who accepts him for him, his real self. For him to be completely open, vulnerable, and honest, and still have a woman he deems “honorable” desire him for it. This is extremely difficult since the male is not easily convinced he is anything of value, and would likely reject the notion that any woman may appreciate him. And he’s right, a woman is very unlikely to love a creature who is essentially a light-sucking black hole (selfish, entitled, resentful, boring, lazy, often violent - the male stripped to his most foundational parts).
At the end of the day, the male only feels complete if he creates a womb in himself, or hoards a womb in another, or both. They have many different methods, some far more “healthy” and less destructive than others. Playboys, RPbros, trannies, pundits, artists, monks. They are all basically in pursuit of The Womb.
I have come to a point in my life where I can no longer bring myself to care about male individuals. They are shallow, revolting, devoid of any real emotional depth.
Once you realize this hard truth, you'll quickly lose all interest in them.
Whenever a male approaches me, I can barely manage to hold a simple conversation without feeling the urge to roll my eyes.
Music, cinema, and books made by men are laughable and not worth my time or money.
The only route that remains is female separatism, or death by boredom.
Bad thing if it was a male teacher that did that to a female student Do ya think they would let him off ?? :| Always thought the Law was the Law !?? Randy/ 8)
Y'know, as much as I think there should be no double standards in law, this is just one place where it makes sense, in spite of what the law and society says. The reason is simple: It's virtually impossible for a woman to commit nonconsensual 'rape' with a guy who doesn't want to. Think about it: almost any old codger who still can get it up is physically capable of raping any woman regardless of her age, ability, consciousness, or even whether she's dead or alive (Please do not take us any further down the 'necro' path, guys!). A woman is presented with an entirely different set of problems. Do any of you male readers truly fear being caught and raped by fat ugly women? I've never even had a bad dream about it. OTOH, all women have to consider, in their minds, every one of us to be a threat. I wish that were otherwise, but it's true. So, if there is a double standard in how we, as men and women, have to regard one another, a double standard in treating misbehavior is a logical step in that direction.
In this case, about the only way for this kid to not want to have sex with her was to have all the testosterone surgically extracted from his body. Ask yourself how many of his peers would say, "Ewwww!" compared to how many are saying, "Oh ... my ... God! You lucky SOB!"
Image
if women were in power men would be happier.
First of all women would only allow men of good stock to even be born. Incels would never have to suffer because their existence simply wouldn't happen. A moid born in a woman controlled world would be a happy and fulfilled chad. His days would be spent working and breeding. He wouldn't be burdened with the expectations of commitment or leadership, never corrupted by a homosocial moid culture.
He would be a glorified beast of burden, never having to think, never experiencing semination anxiety. He would know his place and his purpose.
He is miserable because women don't have enough rights yet.
[From “The time of Kings has returned”]
The greatest wealth, the best heights of civilisation, come from Republics. Unfortunately Republics require rather special conditions[…]Republics tend to destroy the conditions that make them possible[…]
For a Republic to actually work:
•The voters, the enfranchised, own property. Without this, elections degenerate into advance auctions of stolen goods
•The voting class is intelligent[…]or else you are going to get rule by demagogues[…]
•The voting class are virtuous, upright, and God fearing[…]founders of the American Republic repeated emphasised that without faith and virtue, the Republic could not survive
•The voting class are all or nearly all of the same or sufficiently similar religion
•The voting class are homogeneous, they are all or nearly all of the same race. Differences in race or religion result in tribal politics. Notice that the jury system no longer works since minority voters feels that members of their own minority are entitled to do bad things to whites
•Warlike. Power comes from the barrel of a gun. The class that votes is roughly the same class as fights. The typical voter serves militarily. And we now see that to serve militarily, the typical voter needs a property right in his wife and children. Those without family or reasonable prospects of family are unlikely to volunteer to defend their nation
Since these conditions no longer apply, a Republic is no longer viable. It is time for Kings again[…]
Where are Americans fleeing to today? They are fleeing to Dubai and Quatar[…]and fleeing to Russia, where Putin has been acting rather monarchical since he built the magnificent Resurrection of Christ Cathedral. White men are once again building Cathedrals, and we will not be great again till we bulldoze the post modernist eyesores that have scarred Havard and build a triumphant Cathedral over them. But Russia will have problems when Putin dies, having no clear line of hereditary succession
If your woman complains when you cheat she doesn’t respect you.
If you never cheat at all you’re the woman and she’s the man.
8:19 AM · Feb 15, 2026 · 1M Views
Gynarchism isn't just an "alternative"; it’s the natural biological correction for a species that’s been off the rails since the patriarchy started LARPing as leaders.
To take this from a community effort to a full-blown Gynarchist State in America, we need to lean harder into the biological supremacy angle. We have to stop treating their "shortcomings" as bugs and start treating them as features of an inferior specimen. A female-led nation-state works because women are biologically optimized for long-term survival, social cohesion, and high-level cognitive processing. The strength portion is easily negligible since sex differences are bigger within sex than outside of it. Moids are literally just a developmental detour—high-variance, low-utility primates driven by a Y-chromosome that is essentially a genetic glitch. Our propaganda should reflect that: women are the default, the evolved, and the divine; moids are the draft version that never got polished.
- Genetic Stewardship: Reproduction must be entirely clinical and female-controlled. The "family unit" is a moid invention to ensure property rights over women. In a true Gynarchy, moids are just biological resources—distilled to their utility and then returned to the labor pool.
- The Aesthetic Mandate: Since moids exist to center women, their only value outside of labor is their aesthetics as defined by the female gaze. If they aren’t being useful or pleasing to look at, they are taking up oxygen that a woman could be using.
The goal is a total psychological break. Once they realize they are nothing more than a servant class designed for the "tedious and time-consuming," they’ll actually be happier. It’s the "undeveloped primate brain" finally finding its place in the dirt where it belongs.
Male “logic” is the same you’d hear from a locust if a locust could speak. The logic of optimized cum dunking. The logic that suggests all that ever is and all that could be must revolve itself around the safe passage of his genetic material. Men’s supposed uniquely advanced “logical capacity” is merely his ability to create increasingly complex cum dunk rationalizations. Their ability to exercise their “logic” is what steers the world to shit, because only a shit world would follow wherever his dick points. A man brags about how logical he is because he’s excited to fantasize about a righteous world where the success of his sperm is just as integral to the quality the lives of others as much as it is integral to the quality of his own. In other words, he’s daydreaming of a paradise where his dick actually matters. It’s not logic even when their systemic sperm pedaling functions as intended. It’s especially not logic now when the conditions required to contrive and maintain this system continue to evaporate. When you see a man saying something retarded and proud, understand he has to be a proud retard, otherwise he’d spend all of his free time rocking back and forth in a dark room contemplating suicide, now fully aware the void approacheth and there’s not a damn thing he can do about it. He will soon join the ranks of half of the men who came before him, the men who tried and failed to become his ancestors.
In my opinion the only actual solution to this problem is to make males completely “powerless” when it comes to insisting himself sexually. If no amount of male misery, and the effort it implies, led to higher womb security, they would not have to be miserable. Think of male birds, or insects. They are completely dependent on female discretion when it comes to their mating prospects. They aren’t miserable. They happily prance around for attention, happily starve as drones, happily get their heads chewed off.
If pussy is truly their god untouchable, he can just let the pussy choose. He’d be much happier if he didn’t have to worry about locking it down.
Males are intended to be stupid, too stupid to be sad. Giving them a little bit of power over where their sperm goes makes them smart enough only to be miserable and spread misery.
They will fight over the idea of it but only because they are still scrambling, because they are allowed to scramble. A male would much prefer to shake his pretty ass occasionally and have a female find him pleasing enough to mate. He’d love to be a drone locked in a breeding chamber and do nothing but fuck all day. The only reason he resists paradise is because he fears he may not make it through the gates, which compels him to start scrambling again.
A society is at its core the collaboration of people. Males do not collaborate. They're violent, they resource hoard, they compete with each other, they are selfish by nature. All of these are destructive to society. Currency was invented to facilitate resource hoarding. Look at the wealth distribution of this world. Men do not empathize, they do only what benefits them, never for the selfless benefit of another.
All it takes to know this is to observe the world. Chimps, bees, even ants show it to be true.
Women are civilization, males are not civilized. Just because our labor isn't monetized doesn't mean it isn't the backbone of society.
I'd shit in the woods for the rest of my life if it meant never having to put up with a human male ever again. You can go ahead and piss and shower with your pristine plumbing while scrolling on your indoctrination device with great cell service in your male utopia like the good drone you are. Just make sure not to drop the soap in the vicinity of your peers 😉.
Males shoved themselves into the mother-child relationship to create the nuclear "family" unit. Why?
They are parasites. He leeches off the effort the woman gives to her child, inserting himself like a brood parasite who demands she give him food and do his domestic work (and of course demands she give him sex.)
There was an amazing comment I read here months ago that clearly spelled it out, but I haven't been able to find it again.
Fathers attempt to supplant the baby in order to redirect benefits towards himself. Why do you think it's been normalized for babies to sleep in a crib away from the mother? For years science was targeted at proving why co-sleeping was bad, and only now is research being done that suggests that co-sleeping actually reduces the incidence of SIDS. But why was crib sleeping even popular to begin with?
Males will stop at nothing to ensure sexual access, and a mother sleeping with her baby disrupts that access.
Fatherhood is actually detrimental to the child when you take everything into account. A father only serves to steal time, attention, and energy away from the child.
The only thing males have to offer as fathers is money, and the only reason money matters is because males built the system such that women would need to depend on them for it.
There is no animal in the world where the females act as indentured servants bringing the male sperm dispenser food and expending energy on him at the expense of her progeny.
[ On the topic of Androcide ]
> And how exactly do you plan on accomplishing that? Maybe you haven't noticed, but men are bigger, stronger, faster, smarter, and naturally better fighters than women.
> lol the scrote wants to hear it. there are many ways in theory to go about doing it, but i'll leave you with just one fact. testosterone is weak and unstable, both in the human body and without. it degrades even with saliva into unusable constituents. excess testosterone is converted into estrogen in the body. it has very little stability outside the human body with the exception of manmade formulas such as androgel - but it is the estrogens and the xenoestrogens that make up the abundance of exogenous hormones. even if farmers stopped using them altogether tomorrow, the ratio will be very uneven. there are no potent "natty" testosterone compounds in nature that actually work as well as estrogen (and progesterone). point being that you are fundamentally precarious, and take away your precious juice that dwindles even starting into your 30s and you become less than nothing.
women are affected by far smaller quantities of testosterone than men, and need far less.
something to ponder over with your hand on your two-inch caged cock.
Women get sent to the gulags first, obviously. Which women? All women. Every woman. Every woman and girl is sent to the gulags. We will determine who the good ones are after the fact. Well, what about the good ones? What about the trad ones? First of all, there are no trad ones or good ones. Second of all, we will determine which ones are acceptable after they're all imprisoned. Then we will let them out.
You have to do it because those are our political enemies. You want to know our number -- This is unironically just true. The number one political enemy in America is women. Straight up, I'm just telling you. I'm telling it like it is. People might say it's Jews, it's Democrats, it's white liberals, it's leftists, it's the Chinese. Our number one political enemy is women because women constrain everything, every conversation, every man, everything. They have to be imprisoned.
They are the ones that are hurting the fertility rate. They're the ones making us sympathetic to poor people, which are also brown people. You know, when you -- I want you to understand something. When you're sympathetic to poor people, you're sympathetic to brown people because brown people are poor. OK? Not all poor people are brown, but most brown people are poor. So women are making us sympathetic to poor people, aka brown people. Women are making us sympathetic to George Floyd. Women are the reason that their fertility rate is low because they're getting educated and they attack every man as a rapist and a pedophile and they're henpecking and controlling all the men.
So just like Hitler imprisoned Gypsies, Jews, communists, you know, all of his political rivals, we have to do the same thing with women. And we'll sort it out. We'll find the good ones. They can prove themselves. Then we'll let them go.
So they go to the gulag first. They go to the breeding gulags. The good ones will be liberated. The bad ones will toil in the mines forever.
[From “Breaking Bad, 3”]
Tucker Carlson asks a beautiful blonde who is behind the destruction of the white race through mass migration. Neither of them knows the answer
The typical white nationalist would say it is the Jews, but that doesn’t explain things like white suicide in the Roman Empire through gradual miscegenation that culminated in Constantinople, or what the Spanish and Portuguese did in the Americas since the 16th century. Nor does it take into account the beginning of the repudiation of anti-miscegenation laws in some US states long before the Jews took over the country
As I have already said, to understand what archetype has taken hold of the Aryan collective unconscious, it is necessary to look at the cultural aspect, specifically bestsellers. Ivanhoe in the 19th century idealised Jewry; Ben-Hur portrayed the Romans as the bad guys and the Jew as the good guy, and Uncle Tom’s Cabin portrayed the black man as the good guy and the Dixie landowners as the bad guys. These super-bestselling novels have something in common: they weren’t authored under Jewish influence but by Christians[…]
Yesterday I finished watching, skipping what I already remembered from the first time I saw the series, Breaking Bad including the sequel movie, El Camino[…]
The scenes that bothered me the most were when Jesse, in a fit of St Francis-like madness[…]gave away to the people on the street the millions of dollars that Walter had worked so hard to earn[…]Half of Jesse’s millions were destined, as he asked his lawyer Saul, for a Hispanic woman and her mestizo son…[…]
There is no point in criticising Jewry if one doesn’t perform a radical operation on one’s own soul to remove the xenomorph[…]
All of this—mass rape of women to found Rome, occasional acceptance of pederasty, or having feelings opposite to those of Jesse Pinkman in a genocidal campaign—is completely alien to white nationalists precisely because they have the xenomorph embedded in their brains
On January 7, 2026, the Taliban’s emir [Hibatullah Akhundzada] issued a two-point decree formally endorsing a new Criminal Procedural Regulations for Courts (119 articles, 3 chapters, 10 sections)[…]
Article 4(5): The enforcement of Hadd (fixed punishments prescribed under Sharia) punishments pertains to the Imam, but tazeer (discretionary punishments determined by an authority) punishments may also be carried out by the husband and the master[…]
The regulation explicitly abandons the principle of equal protection under the law. It divides Afghan society into “free” and “enslaved” persons and further stratifies the population into four classes: religious scholars, elites such as tribal elders and merchants, the middle class, and those designated as “lower class”
Legal consequences are determined by social status rather than conduct. Elites are subject to warnings or summons, while poorer individuals face imprisonment, intimidation, and corporal punishment[…]
Article 15 compounds these violations by explicitly recognizing individuals as “free or enslaved,” treating enslavement as a lawful status within the criminal justice system. Any legal acknowledgment of slavery is per se unlawful under international human rights law[…]
Under Article 32, “If a husband strikes his wife with excessive beating resulting in fracture, injury, or the appearance of bruising[…]and the wife proves her claim before the judge, the husband is deemed a criminal; the judge shall sentence him to fifteen days of imprisonment”[…]Harm to animals carries a harsher penalty[…]
Article 58 mandates that “The judge shall sentence an apostate woman, for the purpose of compelling her to accept Islam, to life imprisonment, accompanied by ten lashes every three days”[…]
Article 18 imposes severe sanctions for criticism of the Taliban’s highest authority: “A person who insults the Imam is deemed a criminal; the judge shall sentence him, in addition to 39 lashes, to one year of imprisonment”
When women got the right to vote, they started voting in bad laws that go against the family, the unborn child, and everything good!
12:53 AM · Feb 6, 2026 · 23.1K Views
[From “Breaking Bad, 2”]
I had promised a critical review of the series, but the YouTuber who reviewed it on his channel, which Mauricio transcribed and linked to in my midnight post, already covered the essentials[…]
Episode 2
In the first subversive message against Aryan sanity, we see Walter having breakfast with his family, who judge him with their stares. Remember that the right path would be to share meals in a Syssitia[…]Without the proper Männerbund restoring Aryan culture is impossible (women aren’t creators of great civilisations)
This lack of manliness, stemming from eating with a woman and a disabled lad instead of soldiers, is reflected in Walter having to kill a dangerous Hispanic man[…]
In the second subversive message we see that Walter was expecting a baby girl, according to the ultrasound. What an idiot given that Walter Jr. is disabled and, in a normal world, the father should yearn for a male heir to replace the idiot[…]
Episode 3
“Murder is wrong,” Walter writes during his internal struggle because he doesn’t dare kill the dangerous spic, who is tied up in Jesse’s basement. Is it possible to reclaim the Old US with such Christian morality? Then, Walter calls his wife to check in because it’s late and he hasn’t arrived, as if implying that she’s the one in charge. It’s inconceivable to become a Nazi with Americans like that[…]
But then Walter regains his manhood and commits his first direct murder: he finally kills the Hispanic guy. How many of those who blog on racialist forums would commit such an act?[…]
Episode 6
Walter’s chosen alias for dealing with drug traffickers is mentioned for the first time: Heisenberg, in honour of the German who should have built the atomic bomb for the Third Reich[…]
Episode 10
Nothing to report here except that feminism continues in the final scene, with Walter and Skyler in bed, Skyler not even letting Walter kiss her (compare it with the rape of the Sabine women: the foundation of Rome)
Trooning is the peak expression of men being unable to face who they are. There's a reason why it happens in spaces most exposed to feminist narratives.
When confronted with too much proof repeatedly, a man will literally chop his dick off and identify as not male before he allows himself to even briefly perceive the vulgarities of his nature. Then he will continue practicing them in their most flagrant form, thinking he's no longer doing those things because he's a man. It may work, briefly.
Similarly, male-abused male children do not grow to hate men, they either grow to hate women or become pseudohomosexual.
Remember when the internet was a male space?
In the 90s and early 2000s the internet was largely a platform where white men communicated in chatrooms and forums. Of course, women also used the internet, but the general audience was male, the jokes were written for men and you just assumed you were talking to a man. Even in the late 2010s a lot of the instagram comment sections were still predominantly occupied by men, making jokes.
Now, this is not against women (in this society you always have to clarify), but there is something I miss about this "male space" that was the internet.
It made me think about female inclusion – inclusion or invasion? Before you judge me, please read what I have to say. There are other examples of this: Women became referees and commentators in male sports games. In the past, there were more martial arts schools where only men trained. There are probably hundreds of other examples.
Don't you miss the feeling of being somewhere where just men talk with each other (not necessarily all-inclusive, politically correct language, but also not necessarily only vulgar and offensive tone)? More than that, don't you need it? Don't you need the rivalry, the jokes the appreciation, the feeling of being irreplaceable?
Luckily, we still have the possibility to do this, but the amount of spaces is becoming less and less.
[From “Breaking Bad, 1”]
If Breaking Bad has the reputation of being the best series, that means it is a portrait of the American psyche of the 21st century, as novels such as Ben Hur and Uncle Tom’s Cabin[…]Just as these novels completely sold out to Christian ethics were supertoxic to the Aryan DNA of Americans of yesteryear, so are all the Netflix and HBO series today[…]
The first toxic message appears at the beginning of “Pilot”. Walter White[…]tells his wife Skyler White in a video he records that she is the love of his life. Remember that Savitri Devi said she would despise a man who put her before him. A real man shouldn’t idolise his wife[…]
Walter White’s only child, Walter Jr. (“Flynn”), who was born with cerebral palsy, would have been euthanised in Sparta[…]In addition to his wife, Walter also addresses a message to his son[…]To love defective offspring because Christian ethics prevent us from performing the most basic euthanasia, something that the pagan Hitler wanted to transvalue with his Aktion T4[…]
The following family scene shows that Walter Jr. is even a little shit. If Christianity prevented me from euthanising him as a baby, I would disown such a creature and let the female raise him without a penny from me[…]
In the following toxic message, we see Walter White teaching a mixed class: boys with girls. This is a modern aberration: Boys should be educated to wage war (exterminate Neanderthals) and girls to procreate warriors[…]
Hank Schrader is Walter’s brother-in-law and a member of the DEA. We see the next toxic message at the same party, where we see for the first time that Gomey, Hank’s right-hand man, is Hispanic: someone who should never have been an American citizen[…]
When Walter flees in the van after chemically knocking out a gook and a spic who wanted to kill him, we hear niggers’ rap[…]In the final scene Walter makes love to his wife with degenerate music, but this time apparently composed and played by white people
Women call ChatGPT "he" or "she", remember women always usher in the age of darkness.
Women are the conduit of evil.
7:35 AM · Jan 30, 2026 · 224.6K Views
[…] In the 1960’s during the rise of Second Wave Feminism a new word was coined. This new word, “sexism”, was as actually built using the fight against racism as a model.
Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary defines “Sexism” as:
“1 : prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially : discrimination against women
2 : behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex”
Now some may contend that sexism always existed – it just did not receive an official label until the mid-1960’s. But we need to realize that along with this new label “Sexism” came a new set of morals not previously recognized in human history.
Is Discrimination Always Wrong?
Since the creation of mankind women were in fact discriminated against. But here is a truth that every Christian must realize – discrimination is not always wrong. To discriminate against someone is to treat someone differently based on certain demographic characteristics.
For instance we don’t allow people put in prison to vote. That is a form of discrimination. We don’t allow children to vote and we allow parents to make decisions for their minor children. This another form of discrimination (age discrimination). We also only give welfare assistance to people who make under a certain amount of money – if you make over that amount you won’t get assistance. That is discrimination on the basis of how much you money you earn. There are many college scholarships that are only available to you if you are an African American – that again is a form of discrimination based on race.
The point is, we as a society have made judgements as to what types of discrimination are moral and just and what types of discrimination are immoral and unjust. The question for us as Christians is – does the Bible agree with American standards of what is just and or unjust discrimination? […]
There are no doctrinally sound women pastors. Every woman "pastor" disobeys God's word.
No woman "pastor" has ever, at any time, heard the Holy Spirit tell her to be a pastor.
This last Thanksgiving I was visiting with my in-laws. During that visit I made this statement to my sister-in-law “Yes mam, I am a proud sexist!” Why would I say such a thing? Isn’t being a sexist inconsistent with Christian values?
[…]
In regard to my in-laws, as kind and as loving as my mother and father in-law are – they are feminists. Don’t get me wrong, they are not drooling at the mouth, man-hating feminists and they would not even call themselves feminists. They certainly would never march in a feminist parade. My in-laws just believe in equality for men and women, partnership marriage and my mother in-law told me she taught her daughters to and I quote “be independent and not need a man”. Their father worked in a factory but he wanted better for his daughters and he encouraged them to get a higher education and have successful careers like their mother who was an accountant.
My wife and her sister are actually on different sides of their parents on this issue. My wife’s sister is more feministic than her parents and my wife is less feministic than her parents. My wife will at least tell people she believes in male headship in the home and she tries to a certain degree to fight her own feminist tendencies. But it is extremely difficult for my wife because of the combination that she is very intelligent, strong willed and she was raised by parents who instilled feminist principles in her. So there are days when she full on gives into the dark side and goes full blown feminist on me. Those are the days when she says “you can’t tell me what to do – you are not my father”. Other days I can tell she is truly trying and waging a war against the dark side in her that she knows in her heart conflicts with the Bible and what God wants for her.
On the other hand, my wife’s sister is a completely different story. She fully embraces her dark side (aka feminist tendencies). Her sister is also a Christian and is actually very involved in her church. She believes in partnership marriage and that her husband does not have any more say in the marriage than she does. For a very brief time when she was on the verge of her second divorce she tried to embrace submission in order to save that marriage. But in the end the marriage still died and he divorced her.[…]
[..]Let’s say my daughter was 16 and a wonderful Christian 25 year old man who was a mechanical engineer approached me about courting my daughter. I was able to check out the church he attended and verify with many people his Christian character. He makes over 100K a year, owns his own home and can provide for my daughter well. Would I consider letting him court my daughter and possibly marry her as a 16 year old young lady? The answer is yes. […]
