#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

Lebensmüder #crackpot #racist #sexist incels.is

RE: Blackpill r/HAPAS

Always thought that many ricecels from r/hapas and other subs like asianmasculinity or aznidentity in the end want just a white pussy
image

Agree with them on every level and see absolutely nothing wrong with their reaction towards whites taking their women. It's their god-given right to be angry when some man from the other side of the globe travels to their country to fuck there.

And another thing: A fetish from white men regarding Asian women doesn't exist, the opposite is the case, Asian women fetishize white men, but in the end the man is the only acceptable scapegoat (because everything else would imply things that are banworthy on Reddit and basically social suicide if expressed openly).

And another thing: They say that the BBC stereotype/cuckold porn is a harmful fetish perpetuated by white men because they fetishize blacks, the truth is: White women fetishize blacks. It's rare to see cuckolds that are open about their fetish, it's on the other hand not rare to see coalburners that talk in public about their disdain towards white men and their lust for BBC.

But it's not a harmful fetish or dehumanization when it's done by women of course. Women could never fetishize somebody just because of their race. Society will find a way to explain this and find a man as a scapegoat in the end - be it the white cuckold or the white fetishist of Asian women, while saying absolutely NOTHING about the women themselves.

Unironically: The way this so-called egalitarian society protects women from criticism/responsibility would be more fitting for someone who believes that they are children in adult bodies rather than fully formed humans. The same thing when body shaming and height shaming occurs from women - then it's all the fault of the patriarchal ideas of masculinity and other retarded shit, the man is in the end the bad guy.

Valerie Solanas #sexist en.wikiquote.org

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females. We must begin immediately to do so. Retaining the male has not even the dubious purpose of reproduction.

JSM #sexist unz.com

Gents, let me explain something to you. In 1974, Congress passed and Gerald Ford signed “Equal Credit Opportunity Act.” Supposedly to “stop discriminating against women in getting credit.” “How terrible that a married woman can’t have credit in her own name” blah blah blah. Prior to ECOA, to qualify a married couple for a mortgage, a bank could only consider the husband’s income, because it’s common sense that, even if the wife is working now, when the kids show up, she’ll be a stay at home mom, so we can’t write loans for 30 years for income that won’t continue that long.

So, when Congress (more men than women, you’ll note) in its infinite wisdom of bowing to feminist pressures, decided to make it so that the wife’s income could be considered under ECOA, that very act is what has utterly destroyed the American family.

As my dad (a home builder) pointed out at the time, all this will do is drive up housing prices. Because, since a couple CAN borrow more now, the sellers will demand more money. And, as we see, that’s EXACTLY what’s happened. Such that, nowadays a family can NOT buy a house in most cases unless the wife works too to pay the mortgage.

But, a full time job and full time motherhood are just incompatible. It’s just too hard. And since houses in neighborhoods with “good schools” (i.e., safe, i.e., White) cost so much that the wife has to work to make the payment and since motherhood and full time work are too hard to do at the same time, American women either don’t have kids (cuz they’re NOT gonna put em in bad, i.e., minority, schools) or have to leave kids in daycare, where godknowswhat will happen to them.

So, decry the feminists, by all means. But let’s heap the requisite share of opprobrium upon the MEN in Congress (only 16 of the 535 members of Congress were women in the 93rd Congress) who are, in actual FACT, the ones responsible for the single most destructive act against Affordable Family Formation that’s ever occurred.

Jesse Watters #wingnut #sexist mediamatters.org

JESSE WATTERS (CO-HOST): Well, Nancy says there will not be a female president in her lifetime, and I say thank God. I hope there's not a female president in my lifetime.
JESSICA TARLOV (CO-HOST): Why would you say that?
WATTERS: You know what many people are saying, Jessica? Many people are saying do women have the --
GREG GUTFELD (CO-HOST): You are just jumping off a cliff just because you're bored.
WATTERS: -- emotional maturity to be president?
GUTFELD: You are just bored.
WATTERS: Many people are saying do they have the personal contacts in the business world to manage the economy? Many people are saying, Greg, do women have the respect of the generals?
GUTFELD: Who said that?
WATTERS: Many people are saying women don't have the sense of humor to be president. I've heard that from a lot of people. None of those things I believe.
But I believe Gavin Newsom could be the first woman president. Because when I hear him talk, he sounds like a woman. The kind of emotional instability, you don't know whether he's having a midlife crisis, an identity crisis, a crisis of confidence.

"A Penis is a Fucking Weapon" Award

Some classics never really fade away.

various commenters #transphobia #sexist ovarit.com

RE: Men use their penises as literal weapons of war, but we should be fine with them in our spaces.

( femlez34 )
100%. TIMs will say, "well we're not 'men' so that doesn't apply to us", but then in the same breath will threaten feminists with rape to try and get them back in line. I don't think they even realize how much they do this, it's so ingrained in their DNA.

( pepperbeth )
We have to start waking up - sexual violence is a huge motivator for many men, maybe "not all men" but huge numbers. Some will say "oh rape is about sex" "oh rape is about power" but let's allow men some intersectional analysis - sexual power is highly arousing to men. Dominating and harming others is arousing to men. They will watch violence in porn, they will enact it in the bedroom, they will buy slave women to harm for their own orgasms, and they will rape women and children, including their own fucking brothers and sisters, and they become especially aroused and predatory when when war grants them opportunity to rape many vulnerable potential victims.

Do women get aroused by the suffering of others? Not even Aileen Wournos can rival the most average of prostitute-murdering men. The penis isn't the scary part, it's the whole goddamn man.

( Fluffy_gender )
Yes, that's why I find it ridiculous when people say "rape/sex abuse is not about sex, it's about power". Well, power is indeed very sexualized for men...

( Pointer )
Men do seem to have "rape software" pre-installed. Makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint. They are actually able to maintain an erection and have an orgasm while penetrating someone who is screaming and crying in pain. It's crazy.

( Gladys_Kravitz )
Men are carrying loaded weapons at all times, and we're supposed to trust them completely and give them endless chances. It's fucking insane.

Edit: this is why self defense laws are such bullshit and deliberately harmful to women. We literally cannot act in self defense the way a man can. He can kill us with his bare hands in the heat of the moment, we cannot.

Fuck man, they literally kill us with their penises during violent rapes. There is no possibility of a woman killing a man using only her vulva/vagina, it's not the same act at all.

Trust no male, especially one that REALLY wants to violate your boundaries.

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child #racist #wingnut #sexist 3edgesword.blogspot.com

[From “The Queen Negprincress of Mean”]

You may have heard that Queen Elizabeth II is not only Canada's sovereign at this moment but also the de jure Head of State.
[…]
Unfortunately Her Majesty isn't given the luxury to enjoy her temporary extra powers this month, as she's dealing with a disgusting royal bitch of her own. Prince Harry's cuckolding wife Meghan Markle (free advice: when she won't take your last name, don't take a walk down the aisle) has been such a royal pain[…]that nigger slut who destroyed the 6th in line for the throne had to go[…]

We already knew of a lot of problems with Meghan Markle[…]She's a woke nigger, and that really could summarize the whole post. Her entire worldview is at odds with the Succession of Kings of England and the British Empire (unbroken now for coming up on 400 years). She also has a "me me me" attitude[…]she thought that marrying Harry would turn the British Monarchy into the Meghan Markle Show (tonight's guest star: the Queen of England).

Yet like so many thin-skinned celebrities[…]they want all the plusses of their fame[…]without accepting the minuses[…]And now it seems[…]Meghan Mountbatten-Windsor doesn't want another consequence of celebrity: it's now a news story how you treat others
[…]
This "bullying workplace" is what we used to call real life[…]Due in part to government mandates over private companies, instead the companies bent to meet them.
[…]
But, like Cuomo's harassment scandals, the important thing isn't that these people are doing things that conservatives don't consider a big deal: they're doing what liberals do consider a big deal. As Kurt Schlichter (endlessly) says, we expect leftists like Markle to live by the disgusting rules of society they have forced on us.

Lavender #sexist feministcurrent.com

"So what does it mean to feel like a woman? It means that if you are a woman, it’s whatever you are currently feeling." What?!?

I'm baffled that people think this passes for a reasonable statement. If any feeling at all can make you a woman, this means that womanhood has no meaning. If men can be woman, then womanhood is nothing more than a costume. Misogyny has reached its zenith: the erasure of females in the guise of progressive politics. Men who push this propaganda - that's no surprise.

But women who actively indulge in female erasure is always shocking to me and proof positive of just how powerful patriarchy is in convincing women to internalize their own subordination. Men will always use this as an excuse to say that those women who do challenge femininity and gender are just angry, bitter witches.

It's a brilliant system, it really is, and all it needs to perpetuate itself is a critical mass of people who don't care enough about women and girls to question statements that are so clearly nonsensical. If I spend the rest of my life arguing with men and women about this, so be it. Once you realize how insane all of this all is, you just can't keep quiet.

Anonymous #sexist boards.4chan.org

Here I will describe two types of men, and the strategies they employ in hopes of facilitating his access/exploitation of women.

1: Men whose preferred strategy of female access is the promotion of “absolute, indiscriminate equality” between the sexes. By dissuading any behavior that functionally distinguishes men/women, he has less barriers of entry that could impede his access to female supply. Under this system, women are easy pickings for any man.
These can be more hopeful men who think “if only these walls came down, then women will be free to do what they want, which is to please me”. Or more cynical men, who think “if these walls came down, I’d have an even easier time picking off prey”.
For example: commies, libertarians, center-left men “normies”.

2: Men who supports functional gender distinctions to further isolate and funnel women into a “feminine” use category, of which he seeks to exploit by permitting his exclusive access once he meets the conditions to do so (become trans, secure a tradwife).
These men often lean more cynically, thinking that women must be walled-off and forced into a role in order to maintain a position servile to him. There are some hopeful, paternalistic types, who think women would be happier and healthier to relieve themselves of their executive control, and have their lives laid out for them.
Examples: TRAs, tradcons, center-right men “normies”.

It’s difficult to have a conversation with a man of any ideological leaning, because they all form their beliefs around the premise of “facilitating the benefits of female access”. You’ll never come to an understanding, the best you can do is agree where your principles and their strategy happen to cross paths.

For example, making rape illegal:
Men's motivations: “I don't want my female property to be damaged or taken from me by my male competitors."

Women: “through rape, a man impinges on the life, liberty, and happiness of a woman”.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

The male psyche is characterized by mild to severe narcissism. The only reason why it's not rightfully pathologized is because it's part of their biology - they all meet the criteria, so it's their "norm". They come pre-equipped with Dunning-Kruger and positive bias because males are largely expendable (just like their gametes). Their reproductive strategy favors retarded risks because the sole reason why they exist is being a vehicle for genetic diversity and the worst possible outcome for a male is to not reproduce - it's equivalent to death (incels in particular are very truthful about this). So to them, risking everything to make it as a glorified sperm wagon (or doing absolutely anything to spread their DNA as much as possible, whether it's immoral or not) makes sense because it beats quietly waiting to perish. This is what they evolved to do, and absolutely everything about the male mind revolves around this premise. They are not full humans, they are a highly specialized evolutionary crutch with a very narrow task to perform.

HardToSwallow #sexist incels.is

[Venting] Anyone else gotten more and more agressive?

I cannot contain myself anymore. I almost hit my own mom in the face yesterday. Female nature just makes me so fucking mad, I simply cannot fathom that this is how it is, the powerlessness gets too much to handle. Everwhere I look I see blackpill, I see girls lying through their teeth, manipulating men, getting a free pass to everything they want in life and I see them being bitchy and arrogant about it and I see these pathetic fucking cucks kissing the ground they walk on. It's truly sickening. I almost hate those men more than foids, they're the ones allowing this, they're the ones who have put us in this situation. The only reason females have the power they have today is because weak men let them.

marigoldisverynormal and bunnsnuffcat #transphobia #sexist #homophobia #psycho #moonbat tumblr.com

(submitter’s note: bunsnuffcat’s hashtags have been converted into sentences.)

marigoldisverynormal: i honestly do think transmascs should be shot in the fucking head if they start a sentence with "feminism is actually about..."

Why Do You As A Masc Have Such Strong Opinions On Feminism? Do You Think Your Opinions Matter Here?

bunsnuffcat: kill all men forever. especially men that harress bunnies for no fucking reason. all bunnies are girls. if youre a bunny boy you need to kill yourself because youre not real. and youre probably a massive piece of shit racist. honestly kinda goes without saying if youre a white transmasc. i just hate transmascs so fucking much you dont understand. every single fucking transmasc i see ever EVER is my ex literally like the same person always. the ex that abused and raped and beat me for years and kept me in the closet and wanted to force masc me bc he wanted to be gay and a faggot. fuck you fuck all men especially transmascs kill them all fur real so we can be safer.

electronicoffee #transphobia #wingnut #sexist #dunning-kruger reddit.com

Hey dumbshit. How am I sexist for addressing the biological reality that girls prefer to play with dolls and boys prefer to play with trucks? Sorry you hate science or that gendersex is a binary that largely dictates much of behavioral reality. I don't give a fuck about your anecdotal life evidence. No one does. You don't even know what a regressive means because you ARE a literal regressive. Pathetic. Gender and sex were synonymous for most of history until redefined by a feminist asshat professor in the late 60s. We're reclaiming it. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Gendersex

klepperx #sexist reddit.com

Women are incapable of unconditional love for anyone other than their children.

I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost, Than never to have loved at all. ~Alfred, Lord Tennyson

Do you know why a man said that and not a woman? It’s unheard of for a female author to write of a past love who they broke up with. For the same reason why all the great romance poets are men; because women are literally incapable of unconditional love. Even all the “great” romance stories written by women, if the man stopped doing what the woman liked and tipped the scale, the long beautiful love story, spanning over decades, would be over in the blink of an eye. The “love” would be replaced with hate and loathing in a heartbeat; which confirms it wasn’t actual unconditional love in the first place.

Women treat men (and even other women) like tools; something they can use that serves them. And the when the tool stops performing as intended, they flip in a second from really appreciating the tool to hating it and wanting to destroy it because it’s not performing like it did anymore. It’s funny that women will complain that men treat women like objects sometimes. Because men even love objects more than women love men. A car that broke down and almost killed a man at the end yet gave them 20 years of service, even if it was constant costly repairs will still shed a tear when the car goes away and they will look back and speak of how much they loved that car for the rest of their life.

Women do unconditionally love their children though, and it takes the largest biological cocktail known to human science of her entire life to drown her brain for months to force change it from the natural conditionally feeling state. Her husband may lose his job for a time and if the scale is tipped, she’ll divorce him and he’ll instantly become the scum of all the earth, evil, jerk, and not only want him to die, but want him to suffer a horrible pain filled life until the end. However, her children could be serial killers who eat their victims faces off, and she’ll still be like “He’s a great kid, I still love him more than life itself.”

In the ending of a relationship with a man, there is sorrow at the lost, nevertheless, he remembers all the good times, and holds it to be true that it’s better to have love and lost than not to have loved. Because all that time passed at an elevated emotional state. A woman doesn’t feel this way. She’s angry. Bitter. Vindictive. “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned” is a idea well known in every single culture around the world as long as they were able to write it down.

Why? It’s just the nature of the woman to be a conditional lover. She’s out of this world nice and sweet with the condition as long as you’re giving her what she wants in the moment. But the second the scales are tipped: watch out. If you’re a woman who has never had a relationship, or an inexperienced man, you probably think, “Oh, this guy is just being vindictive, this isn’t how women operate.” That’s why I want you to go prove this to yourself, by yourself. I want you to find a guy, ANY guy on planet earth, who has just gone through divorce, (there are many) and see if he was not shocked and floored at his ex-wife's total transformation from a nice reasonable rational cordial person, into a super vindictive, evil, lying, conniving, super bitch - at the drop of a hat.

I don’t even need to qualify it, you go find any. single. one. you want and you will find this is 100% true. (I suspect there is something feeding this void seeking behavior in the environment of modern feminism western culture that’s amplifying this core nature in women because the problem is getting worse. Women are allowed more freedom now-a-days to unabashedly be who they really are. That is the modern message they are receiving since childhood.) Even if she cheated on him (women’s thinking: if a man cheats, it’s the man’s fault, if a woman cheats it’s also the man’s fault), even if the divorce was her idea, even if she was a lesbian and tricked him/lied to him to get married because she wanted a more "traditional" life, she will turn on a dime and loath and try to destroy him. This isn't unconditional love.

I don’t think it’s their faults, they are just incapable. Which is why evolutionarily speaking something drastic needed to happen to change their natures when dealing with their own offspring (children are never going to act the way women want them to). Women use people for whatever reasons all women do: money, kids, convenience, handy man, stress reliever, babysitter, use men as a trophy in the competition that women all are apart of until menopause. And they ALL do it, and this is the vast vast majority of all women in all marriages. If she really loved you, there wouldn't be this drop-of-a-hat transformation into ultra-beeotch mode.

Men do genuinely unconditionally love. They are capable and it’s in their natures. Things didn't work out dating? Guys will always have a love for these girls, even if they weren't the right ones, even if they dumped them, even if they got dumped. Many women have received the drunken late night phone call/text from their former boyfriend proclaiming their undying love. Men even have a respect their enemies they fight in war. Yes, they want to kill them before they get killed, but they still have a great and profound respect them. Women have no respect for their enemies. Go prove this for yourself and ask any principal for any school in the country and they will confirm that bullying is a huge problem: and it’s a 99% girl on girl problem. Girls want their (male or female) enemies beyond dead, they want them psychologically destroyed, publicly humiliated and irreversibly damaged and live a lifetime of horror and regret for having bothered/offended/crossed them.

Women understand women, and countless women don’t like women and will only hang out with guys in school; they cite no faux relationships, backstabbing or no drama as to their reasons. And guys are cool with that, and will readily accept them into their groups with loving protective arms. Women will readily agree that this is what adolescence was like, and it carries well over into the dating or corporate world, then it continues into The Mommy Wars. (“daddy wars” is not a thing) Then a battle of whose kids are more successful. Eventually, for most, it starts to fade off with menopause. However there are still small skirmishes with grandma wars in the battle of who has more grandkids for the few who can’t let it go. It’s just their natures.

So my brothers, if you saw a someone with down syndrome freaking out in a store, or even if they hurt you physically, you wouldn’t want to retaliate and hurt him or her back. They are broken, it’s not biologically their fault; so be extra kind to women, be compassionate. This doesn’t mean you have to be in harmony and conjoin yourself to diabolically psychotic behavior. Your kindness isn’t because they deserve it, but because you do, it feels better. It’s who you really are. It’s in your nature to be unconditionally loving and be in that state. It’s not for them, but for you. Because you deserve it.

Jim #sexist #fundie #homophobia #racist #wingnut #forced-birth blog.reaction.la

[From “Ode to the Nineteenth Amendment”]

Female emancipation prevents successful reproduction because it leads to no-fault divorce, which is in practice men-are-at-fault divorce, because it encourages women to pursue options inconsistent with marriage and family, and all this is contrary to the will of God, who prohibits divorce and homosexuality, and commands women to be under the authority first of fathers, then of husbands, and because it leads to demographic catastrophe, the problem of the missing grandchildren. And though it is harmful to everyone’s reproduction, it is particularly and especially harmful to white reproduction[…]
That women are profoundly unhappy with the results of the emancipation that they wanted is illustrated by female porn, which tends to be set in worlds where the main female character magically loses the capability to make such choices[…]Female porn tends to have the main character a strong independent and sadly isolated woman in the modern world, who gets magically transported into magical world where she is no longer isolated, but is firmly under male authority, the magical world being patriarchal, or the character powerless, or the world dominated by predatory male violence[…]
Female emancipation is a shit test. When a man fails a shit test by giving a woman what she demands and passionately believes she wants, she gets twice as unhappy and twice as angry, and this is what surveys of female happiness and mental health show. Surveys consistently show that conservative women are saner and happier than liberal women, conservative Christian women are saner and happier than non Christian conservative women. Liberal women are however similarly crazy and unhappy regardless of faith, possibly because their Christianity is the postChristian faith of God the transsexual father and mother, Jesus the Jewish community organizer, and their God supports female adultery, divorce and abortion

Revengeofmedusa #sexist #crackpot twitter.com

[NOTE: "Secondary bodies" refers to men]

All secondary bodies were once perfect women, at least in the first two months as a fetus, it was no different from a female fetus. And the 6th week is the turning point of its fate, the SRY gene on the Y chromosome begins to be transcribed, producing SRY protein to turn the primordial gonads that should have developed into ovaries into testes. Starting from the 8th week, when it only weighs 2 grams, the Y chromosome gene releases up to a hundredfold of testosterone through the testes, beginning a comprehensive downgrading process (masculinization) on its brain.

Irreversible Fetal Brain Masculinization Degradation

1. Pruning of neural networks in the empathy language awareness region Fundamentally limits the capacity to construct advanced conscious communication

2. Highly lateralized brain Left and right hemispheres tend toward independent operation, lacking a holistic view, adept at linear logical thinking, modular science-oriented brain

3. Approximately 2.5 times larger sex drive region Sex drive becomes its core motivator

4. Specialized amygdala and weakened prefrontal cortex Instinctual fight-or-flight reactions, high stress, difficult emotional control

(Translated)

World Eater #sexist #psycho #crackpot twitter.com

Men using women for what they exist to do - birthing more males, and offloading the burden of reproduction off of men so that men can be (the only) complete, fully functioning human beings both biologically and psychologically, is bad how exactly?

Female continued existence is in fact parasitic. Any moment women aren't incubating, they're an active negative in terms of resources (leeches), and once they reach advanced maternal age, they become complete biowaste. The sexes have different genetic interests because women are

image

wеаk, rеtаrdеd, and easy to kіll. We wuz da Makers and Admins of the species n shit but we're also functionally the most worthless females in the animal kingdom, and we somehow live in a patriarchy lolol. If nothing else, foid coping mechanisms are at least amusing

image

vladimirlenincel #sexist reddit.com

Has anyone noticed the lack of empathy women possess?

They don’t care about anyone other than themselves. This is why feminism is such a popular movement overall, it’s a chance for women to gain privileges and gain superiority over men. They make false claims like the wage gap then cry for imaginary justice against the so-called “patriarchy”, what a load of shit.

They especially hate incels, I remember I watched this one YouTube video of an attention whoring female going through an incel forum. She didn’t care at all about the posts involving suicide or depression, she just kept on crying about how the incels wanted to hurt and rape females even when most incels are peaceful.

Rev. Joel Webbon #sexist #conspiracy #racist #elitist #transphobia #wingnut peoplefor.org

It is well established that Joel Webbon is a deeply misogynistic, antisemitic, white nationalist far-right pastor, so it was no surprise to see him put all of these qualities on display during a recent episode of his "Right Response" program, where he alleged that gender equality is a Jewish plot to eliminate white people and destroy the world.

The crux of Webbon's argument is that nefarious forces are at work providing women with various means and reasons to forgo motherhood in favor of having a career, and that these forces are intentionally doing so in order to "eradicate white people"

"The end game in pushing egalitarianism pertaining to the sexes almost exclusively in the West and nowhere else is because they want Western people, particularly those of European descent—AKA white people—to stop procreating," Webbon declared. "True equality for women with men can only be attained if women have all the same opportunities that men have and they never ever will so long as they bear children[…]"

"So how do you achieve then equality between men and women?" he continued. "There is only one way to do it: you have to cut off motherhood; you have to cut off procreation. So then what is the outcome? What is the real end game, the real driving incentive and motive of those who have pushed for an egalitarian system as it pertains to men and women, but done so almost exclusively in the West among those of European descent? I'll cut to the chase[…]It's very simple: They want to eradicate white people"

"This is the destruction of the world," Webbon added. "Egalitarianism is not baked into the scripture. It is baked into the fabric of communism. It's baked into the fabric of Marxism. And it is baked into the fabric of Judaism, which I believe is the root of communism. It is the root of transgenderism. It is the root of Marxism. It is the root of all bitter, baseless envy that just seeks to destroy the world"

Rippedrichandincel #sexist fstdt.com

This is true. Giving birth to children is morally indistinguishable from rape. In either case you thrust upon an individual something they have not consented to. If you wish to say it's ok in the case or childbirth because unborn children cannot consent, then you must say it's ok to rape unconscious femoids because they too cannot consent.

Child birth is evil, though you know this already because you creeps posted my posts about it

letg0orbdragged #crackpot #sexist twitter.com

The greatest lie ever told is that the male is the same species as women

> Tbf there are some things in common

This tweet shows just how good males have gotten at mimicking women. The reason why women buy into the lie that males and women are the same species is because the parasite uses female flesh to copy itself and mimics women expertly to convince her he’s part of her species

NiteStryker #sexist #psycho gamefront.com

High School Gang Rape...I blame the girl

Ok. Girl went to homecomming dance, was waiting for her dad to pick her up*, then was gangraped and beaten.

Horrible story.

But, alot of stories overlook the *. The astrisk being, she started drinking large amounts of alcohol, clearly underage, around a bunch of guys. And I am willing to bet she wasn't dressed very conservatively either, being a high school girl coming from a dance.

So, you know what? Hold those accountable for the rape and beating, but I fault the girl on this as well, for putting herself in the compromising situation. Im not going to go all the way and say "this was solely the girls' fault", but I will say she did, in a way, bring this on herself.

If this was a girl walking to the parking lot and was attacked out of nowhere, then its all on the rapists. But when you are going to put yourself in a bad position, I hold you accountable for that just as much as the guys who committed the act. She shouldnt have been drinking. She shouldnt have been in a dimly lit area with a bunch of other guys who had been drinking. And I am going to make an assumption that she was probably dressed a bit slutty. (Could be wrong). But she is not a total victim here, in my opinion.

Flame away, I know its bound to happen.

letg0orbdragged #sexist #crackpot twitter.com

‘Men are taught to see women as objects’ how do you teach someone to not recognize life? It is so obvious this is a deficiency of the Y chromosome and also explains their phenomenon of fetishization. They are incapable of grasping a woman in her entirety because women are XX

How could the male see woman as human when they aren’t? The male view of woman is what the male CAN see of woman. How could a creature with only 1 X chromosome grasp a creature with 2? They CAN’T. It’s not taught. It’s innate

image

How can you teach someone to see LESS of a form of life? Lmao. Have you seen the y? The obvious explanation is that a less evolved creature cannot grasp a more evolved creature. They also can’t love or feel empathy to list only a couple of their vast, vast deficiencies

Earming #sexist #racist incels.is

Femoids have come to adopt negroid culture (such as rap, clothing, drugs etc. and of course being blacked) in a similar way to how they adopted lookism: an aesthetic value blown out of proportion to the point it is self sustaining. For that is what African-American culture is, an arbitrary value desired by women (despite from the benefit of Britsh Broadcasting Company) due to the status it brings, thus it is self sustaining; if you do not follow it you will be ostracised from support groups and potential partners. Men, for the most part as we are much more complex, and as might be expected, only engage in it to impress and court women or gain status and impress friends. A culture with no deeper tenets than bling and violence (which women also are attracted to).
Another reason is how debaucherous it is.

This has all been subsidised of course by the American Jews and their puppet governments.

Unknown Centurion #fundie #sexist #wingnut crisismagazine.com

he Son of God did not bring salvation and redemption to our fallen world through His signs, wonders, or words, but rather, by willingly experiencing an incomprehensibly violent death in the most virile manner, overcoming it at His Resurrection. Jesus gave up His life that the Body of Christ, the Church, would live as the chosen vessel of the salvation He won until He returns. His Church was conceived at the Cross as the precious Blood and Water gushed forth from His most Sacred Heart, which also became the supernatural source of its sacraments.
<...>
This means that God’s perfect, providential plan of salvation was not accomplished through passivity or piety but in the most masculine manner by His Son who took on flesh in order to sacrifice it, even pouring out the final drops of His Blood in the most humiliating, painful way. And we don’t accept His salvation accomplished on Calvary by mere mental assent, acknowledging that such an event actually occurred, but through active participation in this once for all sacrifice— did the courageous centurion who leapt into action to accomplish the will of God, regardless of the costs, and thereafter lived fully and manfully for Christ as the original warrior-monk.
<...>
When the Kingdom came into its earthly existence at the Cross, it was embryonic and extremely vulnerable to the powers of the earth and its prince which were at eternal enmity with it. This is why God, according to His perfect plan and providence, targeted the most indominable, indispensable men of the vaunted Roman military to tend, defend, and extend the Kingdom of God, fulfilling the Edenic duties which Adam abdicated.
<...>
In our time, does God want courageous, countercultural men of faith and action to reclaim the mantle of such a centurion office to tend, defend, and extend the Kingdom of God, which is led, in large part, by too many weak and worldly men, is virtually devoid of defenders, and has lost much land and many souls to the evil Spirit of the Age?

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

Most males just ferment into compost instead of cook into a meal.
Create an aggregate example of a male and female human, remove all affectations, shave them bald, and the male will more closely resemble a child than the woman. An out of shape male especially will almost always look more childlike than an out of shape female.

The point of saying this is to demonstrate that male theory often does not align with reality, and the same males who claim that women in general resemble children will simultaneously believe that every individual child more resembles their male parent (even more perplexing that this supposedly applies especially to female children). It’s a paradoxical belief that can be easily explained as the dissonance produced when male subjectivity is incorrectly interpreted as universal objectivity. If evopsych says that children look like males to increase paternal investment and prevent infanticide, evopsych cannot also say women look like children because children make men so aroused they selected for females who look more like children. I could more easily believe the first since there are known mechanisms in place which could produce the effect, but the latter is just an exercise in magical thinking only possible with a piss-poor understanding of how sexual selection functions. More men than not believe their primitive male ancestors had the restraint to keep their dicks in their loincloths because ‘2/10 elbows too pointy’ in order to genetically engineer women of the future to better resemble sexy prepubescents (already an oxymoronic premise), which should further convince you to be skeptical of every claim they make. Everything males say is bullshit, as misogyny takes precedence over the truth. He will argue a logical paradox without taking a single breath in between sentences so long as both statements best follow the misogyny-first-principle. Men get a paranoid thought or dick twitch and call their exhaustive list of rationalizations to justify them science and intellect.

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

Men are never mad at women for reasons that have nothing to do with being rejected by them. Immediately pursuing porn of them is a form of panicked reassurance seeking - "no no no, this is not really happening! They're not better than me like mommy, they're not above me like mommy, they're not LEAVING like mommy did! See, there's this video of them groveling before me! Okay, I can feel alright for a few hours now!". For a man, a woman rejecting him is wielding dreadful power over him. She is the mommy withholding the nipple, she is killing him. As most things men think and feel after puberty are tainted by their libido (because their sole purpose is dispensing sperm and dying), the "mommy don't leave, I hate you bitch, I will hold my breath until you come back" infantile rage becomes "I will fuck mommy so hard until she's cock-hypnotized into staying because my cock is very magical actually, it's totally not worthless unlike what those Tinder bitches think". Most male fetishes can be traced back this way, they're nothing but sexualized maladaptive coping mechanisms - coping with female withdrawal, coping with powerlessness, coping with sexual expendability, coping with reality itself. Biologically worthless penises become worship-worthy and precious (while still being portrayed as dirty because men can't help but resent women who lower themselves by being with them), biological garbage that is semen is craved like it's ambrosia, women cease being cold and picky like mommy - not only are they eternally available, they actually become this way after being unavailable because the male is just so irresistible - the essence behind all the pathetically wishful "turning a cold bitch into a cock hungry submissive slut" drivel that helps them cope with how women treat them in real life. In that case porn is supposed to be some sort of a reassuring sequel to being told to fuck off by their most recent beta orbiting subject, which requires that initial rejection to be incorporated into the fictional narrative as something that's "overcome" later.

Mfon Amun Ptah #crackpot #sexist kushitekalkulus.tumblr.com

The Clitoris was not always a part of female anatomy

Prior to what geneticists call Mitochondrial Eve, prior to the cataclysms that degenerated our anatomies, women on the planet looked a little different than women do today.

The clitoris was not a part of the female anatomy prior to these cataclysms, prior to Mitochondrial Eve, prior to the L 0 mtdna Haplogroup matrilineage, the clitoris did not even exist.

The clitoris is a masculine aspect. The clitoris is a pathological degenerative expression reminiscent of the phallus. This is why our foremothers sought to remove it.

This is one of the many reasons of female circumcision.

Men did not always have the prepuce and Women did not always have the clitoris.

Kartvellia #sexist #fundie nationstates.net

Women are perpetual minors- They must never act independently of their Paterfamilias or male guardian- Their father, husband, or oldest son. They manage the household/estate when he is gone, and that is the end of it. By turning women into men, or attempting to, we spit in the face of Heaven. Metaphysically, the feminine nature is dependent on and molded by the male nature- Women must always be subordinate to man as the moon depends on the sun's light.

autisticblackcel #sexist #psycho reddit.com

What would you do in this scenario

Covid-19 mutated and gave us all x men like powers,you left your costume at home,you see a 5'7" 120 lbs aspie manlet truecel going into a Starbucks coffee filled with foids ,he is holding a hk416 assault rifle, what would you do?

A - Let him have his fun,you need to keep your identity a secret

B - Be a simp and Punch his brains out his head,blow your cover,

Joel Webbon #fundie #sexist #racist peoplefor.org

"The end game in pushing egalitarianism pertaining to the sexes almost exclusively in the West and nowhere else is because they want Western people, particularly those of European descent—AKA white people—to stop procreating," Webbon declared. "True equality for women with men can only be attained if women have all the same opportunities that men have and they never ever will so long as they bear children, so long as women can get pregnant."

"So how do you achieve then equality between men and women?" he continued. "There is only one way to do it: you have to cut off motherhood; you have to cut off procreation. So then what is the outcome? What is the real end game, the real driving incentive and motive of those who have pushed for an egalitarian system as it pertains to men and women, but done so almost exclusively in the West among those of European descent? I'll cut to the chase. Here it is. It's very simple: They want to eradicate white people."

"This is the destruction of the world," Webbon added. "Egalitarianism is not baked into the scripture. It is baked into the fabric of communism. It's baked into the fabric of Marxism. And it is baked into the fabric of Judaism, which I believe is the root of communism. It is the root of transgenderism. It is the root of Marxism. It is the root of all bitter, baseless envy that just seeks to destroy the world."

Laura #sexist thinkinghousewife.com

If all this is true, what are these women protesting? As I said, they are frightened. There is such a thing as rape, and they cannot process that reality. They have no way of understanding or making sense of it – and so they protest against it, hoping that outrage alone will make it go away. They want a world in which rape does not occur. Such a thing is not possible. However, there is a way to gain safety. A woman can protect herself against rape not by staging protests, especially protests defending sluttiness, but by earning the protection of good men. Men protect women against men. The sensible woman’s path in a dangerous world is to earn the protection of good men.

The "It's Everyone's Fault But Mine" Award

For excellence in blowing time bitching on the internet rather than doing... anything...

coconut #sexist whygodwhy.org

[...they don't beg their mothers for sex, beat up their parents, scream at people naked in front of a court house, or start smear campaigns against people for imaginary slights.]

So they are better because they were born with a hole between their legs? Men who don't do that are better than me because they are more immoral, stupid and irresponsible than I am in a world where that is evolutionary advantage? I mean, you should understand that all of this was a consequence of my incel. There would be no need to beg my mother for sex if I have gotten sex some other way. There was no reason to beat up my parents if I could have found a gf some other way than with their help. There was no reason for me to go naked with a drum in front of a court house if I could have found a gf on my own. I wouldn't start smear campaigns if I weren't rejected 20 times just this year or if I had any prospects of finding a partner. I know that most incels don't react like that, but some incels kill themselves or others too so some react even worse.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Because women cooperate with men without any rational or utilitarian reason, any woman who chooses to be unconditionally nice to them is (overtly or subconsciously) perceived as a useful idiot/retarded and low value. Understand that it's completely incomprehensible for a male to care for someone on a non-transactional basis - if you choose to do this, you're basically mentally disabled in his eyes, like a human equivalent of a sperm cell giving way to another sperm cell for literally no reason. It's kind of why they berate women for being "irrational" while realizing that they have to be irrational to willingly get involved with men. There are no truly good men, there are bad men who a) can't afford to be openly bad or b) find it more useful to LARP as good at the moment. A male is only as moral as his options allow him to be.

svas2137 #sexist reddit.com

The idea to last long for hours to " satisfy" a ₩hym@n like a p@r#$tar is a complete made up B$ to shame men to control them to hurt their ego so to gain more power and control over them and to satisfy selfish agendas bcoz the only power over men that ₩hym€n hav is $€x.. Nature has alwz been about reproduction spreading ur $€€d to reproduce. Do u think in wildermess a lion or a bull or a wild elephant gives 2 fu@ks about the "feelings" , pleasure and desire of a ₩hyman?? Or Chengis khan might have asked while fu@kin a ₩hym@n "Hey honey how are you feeling? gud? Lemmi.do a sweet pillow talk afterwards.". Nope. It was all about spreading ur $eed passing ur genes to carry ur lineage for the survival.of the species. It alwz has been.

Edmund_Kemper #wingnut #transphobia #sexist #senpai_noticed_us incels.is

(More from this thread bashing FSTDT)

KeithInc

this retard thinks he can handle being called a bigot and therefore he supports trannies using the women's room because it's the right thing to do. i'm sure if this fag lived 10 years ago, he would've thought this tranny bathroom thing is insane. he thinks it isn't difficult being called a bigot. well, i dare him to condemn the tranny bathroom thing on twitter, and he will be the victim of a viral call-out culture tweet and be harassed by tons of leftists on there, while if he defends it, he'll be praised on there and maybe only a few right-wingers will attempt to hassle him. he should try condemning the tranny bathroom thing on a viral video and he could get doxxed and cyberbullied to death. also being called by a nigger lover by a few people isn't as bad because most people won't hate you for respecting black people. many people WILL hate you if you oppose this trans bathroom shit. when you're taught by the norm that you're an evil monster if you oppose certain "rights", you're gonna support these "rights" out of fear. i know for a fact he'd oppose this trans bathroom thing 10 years ago. and he claims to have a wife. jfl i bet he doesn't. he's probably just some dumb 20 year old pretending to be in his 30s

Skida

this fag says "iT's NoNe oF yOuR BuSiNeSs wHaT BaThRoOm tHeY uSe" yes it is. the reason why trannies with cocks using the women's room or trannies with vaginas using the men's room is controversial is NOT because people are "bigots" it's because we seperate mens room and womens room because of difference in genitals NOT difference in gender/chromosomes. a person with a penis and a person with a vagina sharing the same bathroom is bad because of privacy issues, safety issues, etc. an adult with a penis shouldn't use the same bathroom with a 11 year old girl with a vagina all by herself. what's next? make all bathrooms shared by men and women and make all locker rooms, etc shared by men and women? it is our business because if a man walks into the women's room, women will feel uncomfortable. i'm sure many will feel uncomfortable if a trans woman walked in (but many women wouldn't admit that).

Timjer

"we don't care about you incels, sweety" then why do you post about us? and this faggot thinks IT means pennywise jfl.

(later post)
Jfl at this post-wall roastie

"Swede? Is he talking about me?

Well, I’ve said a lot of things here, so I might have commented on him as well. I doubt that I’m “bluepilled” though, and I’m clearly not a fag. I’m more of a fag-hag…

I accept homosexuals and transgender people because they exist, and are not harmful to anyone else. I’d never write like that with every other letter a vowel, I’d get a cramp in my 50-year-old fingers.

As I call myself SWEDE, whatever AMERICANS approve of or not is clearly not my business. Of course, I care, and I can protest, but I can’t vote on it.

I probably said I WANTED to resist Kim Jong-un, but I don’t know if I would dare. I don’t want to end up like Sophie Scholl in the Weiße Rose.

Ancient Greece didn’t just have teen boys fucking adult men, it had long-term relationships between men of the same age in the army, and in other parts of society.

Ordinary men in history have very seldom married “jb” (jailbait, I guess) girls, as ordinary men needed a house-keeper; someone to organize the home and delegate to the servants what to do. A 12-14-year-old girl can’t do that! As second or third wife; yes, perhaps. Royalty, who needed heirs rather than life-partners, sure, but they were often BOTH small children when they were betrothed to each other.

I KNOW teens, I know that the brain is not fully mature until somewhere around 25 to 30. If anything, people grow up faster now, with better nutrition. Children are ALLOWED to stay children longer now, than before 1900, but that doesn’t mean they were ready and able for it then. After all, it took around a million years to reach the first billion people, but it took only two centuries, after that, to get to 7,7 billion people."

This foid claims to be 50 years old LOL. what 50 year old woman posts on a forum making fun of other people? she's probably saying that to appear "mature" and "wise". she's probably 20. and then she says she accepts lgbt people because they deserve respect, when she probably would've thought of them as "freaks" back in the 50s. and then she says it was rare for jb foids to marry in history when that's BS. if you look up marriage in ancient greece, girls DID marry 14/15 to men twice their age. just because homosexuality/pederasty existed back then doesn't mean men marrying jb foids never happened. also, sex between 2 males back then doesn't mean men married each other back in ancient greece. in ancient egypt, girls usually married at age 12-15 and boys married at usually 15-20. in ancient israel, girls typically married at age 12-13. in the early meiji period, women in japan usually married at 16. in 1371, most 16 year old girls were married and many 15 year olds were too. in the early 1900s, the average age for indian girls married was 13 and it was 20 for boys. before the industrial revolution, in regions like india, china and east europe, many teen girls married to older men.

and then swedes says "jB fOiDs CaN't hAnDLe bEiNg wiVeS". teenagers today maybe that's the case but teens back then grew up a lot faster. this teen brain thing is a MYTH. i've read about how the teen brain is NOT the cause of immature/reckless behavior and that the behavior causes the immature brain and that teens actually act immature because we infantilize them and treat them like kids. laws restrict teens' adult rights didn't appear until the 20th/21st centuries. teens used to be much more mature back in the day.

check out these urls about the teen brain myth: https://drrobertepstein.com/pdf/Epstein-THE_MYTH_OF_THE_TEEN_BRAIN-Scientific_American_Mind-4-07.pdf The Danger of Treating Teens Like Children Are the Brains of Reckless Teens More Mature Than Those of Their Prudent Peers?

now anyways, she once said that people in the 50s were more "live and let live" than i think. ok go back to the 50s and date a black person in public. go ahead. see how it ends.

here's the link: 3$QD8PZ6JVM46

Deane_ #sexist reddit.com

If you haven't lose your virginity by 21 it's over just stop.

If you ever have the opportunity to look through a girls phone or iPad it will redpill you more than anything ever could.

The amount of options and men hitting on them women have is insane. I won't go into details but I recently looked though a 6's stuff and it's literally insane.

Any woman worth dating will have 100s of dudes after them by 21. Even if you somehow managed to get with one being a virgin the difference in the power dynamic is too much to overcome. She has hundreds of options one text message away. You have zero.

TakeYerPills #sexist reddit.com

If women tempt you, just try thinking like a seven-year-old. Maybe dress and talk like one too.

Tell yourself that girls are icky and have cooties. Maybe try singing "No dick, no dick, na na na na na!" in the style of a playground chant. (Just don't do it too loudly).

Schoolboys instinctively know how to go their own way. It's only later that they end up getting force-fed the blue pill.

Sadness #sexist incels.is

{Submitter‘s note: This is an older thread I stumbled across today and I had to submit it for the hilarious gender mix up}

[RageFuel] FSTDT.com (CuckTears-lite) proves the black pill while attacking my thread

It was my thread about making small-talk.

SpoilerI've recently been trying to get more extroverted since my loneliness is mentally torturing me at this point. I think I've become pretty well-versed in the art of interacting and small talk with certain types of people (strangers in public, male employees, classmates, acquaintaces). Older adults are always friendly; but for people my age, it depends.
Other incels (including soyboys) are the easiest to talk to since they, like me, are also desperate to not be treated like garbage.
Normies are usually receptive, especially if they're alone or in small groups.
Chads will only be receptive if they're employees or if they're alone. If they're in groups, they won't be as rude as foids, but they still don't want to be associated with a subhuman nerd. They'll usually give a quick smile-and-nod response and mingle with someone else.
But then there's femoids :feelscry:. This is where it truly hurts. Sometimes, after continued success in riffing with other dudes, I forget that I'm a hideous subhuman and try to make conversation with a girl. I then get a harsh dose of reality when I see them disinterestedly utter a one-word response and not even look at me; or at worst, give me a dirty look. If they're employees, they'll manage to put on a forced smile but make me take the hint.

It's humiliating :feelscry:. Each time I briefly wonder "Was it something I said?" then I realize "Oh yeah, I forgot I was ugly."

I guess trying to have some sort of interaction with holes as a sub5 is a crime against humanity to them, so they decided to copypaste my thread onto their site and mock me for it.

Some stupid bitch's snide comment and her beta orbiter's response:

#2187759
Niam

You're damn right I don't want to be associated with a fucking incel. If I get the feeling a guy is some loser who shrieks about FFFFFFFOIDS online I'll try and make interacting as difficult as possible. Some may call this bullying.

Me, I call this preemptive measures.


#2187973
The Crimson Ghost

@ Niam- and your good work does not go unappreciated.

Hmm, so you intentionally act like a cunt to any guy who you think might be "some loser"? What exactly about random stranger would arouse that kind of suspicion?

{thinking Pepe emojis}

(being ugly)


Holes are disgusting vile creatures.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Who socialized women this way?

Females give birth and nurture a helpless undercooked fetus that's only able to communicate via assorted screams. You misinterpreted one screech from it and it dies. How do women instinctively know what the fetus wants despite not looking like the fetus, not being a fetus herself and having no way to determine what it's thinking through conversation?

This is where the empathy gap comes from. Males did not need to evolve the ability to accurately interpret the mental states of anything that doesn't look like them, so they will never have the same level of concern for women as vice versa. That's why the average whiteknight just wants to get laid, whereas the average pickmeisha is mostly stanning dicks because being mean to males is AbStRaCtLy UnFaIr and ReVeRsE SeXiSt. At the lowest level there is definitely some self interest in the form of prosocial approval and signalling her docility, but it's not as straightforward as stone cold opportunism of "pro female" males.

If women had male levels of empathy/theory of mind, men would be routinely killed and maimed for the kind of treatment they subject women to. No man would tolerate this degree of atrocity while whiteknighting and cooing the gender that perpetrates it. What you refer to as "patriarchy" wasn't established through physical force alone.

What are you going to do if your son is a rapist or an incel? 99% of "feminist" women would promptly make an exemption for him despite tweeting #killallmen all day, even if they're radfems.

Scott Yenor #fundie #sexist ms.now

“Every effort must be made not to recruit women into engineering, but rather to recruit and demand more of men who become engineers,” he said. “Ditto for med school and the law and every trade.”

“If every Nobel Prize winner is a man, that’s not a failure,” he continued. “It’s kind of a cause for celebration. Why can’t our celebration of male excellence in sports be translated into all facets of life. More successful men will mean more happy citizenry and a stronger nation.”

In that same speech, Yenor attacked women who prioritize careers over family and revealed something else about his thinking, something that should frighten everyone:

“Such medicated, quarrelsome and meddlesome women gain their meaning through the seeming participation in the global project. They are agents of the new world, but not new life. Such women are now the backbone of every left-wing cosmopolitan party in the Western world, from the Greens in Germany to the Democratic Party in America. And if our ideal woman is a childless media scold or a barren bureaucratic apparatchik, there is no question whether we can have a future. We can’t. There is a question of whether we deserve one.”

Anon #sexist #racist boards.4chan.org

> Look, they are lowering the standards just to admit more women.
> Look, there are gender quotas that must be filled with women and fags.
> We don’t care about men's suffering; they deserve it.
> Since high school, we’ve been investing money to push more women into STEM careers.
> How strange, there are fewer men in colleges.
Women are total badasses, anons!
They are so superior

I’d like to live long enough to see how they suffer when the infrastructure starts to fail significantly, and they only have Africans and Pajeets to fix it

Vox Day #sexist #racist voxday.net

[From “No Children, No Economy”]

By the time the next economic depression bottoms, it will be illegal for women to not have children in many countries:

Underneath all of this, slower than any war and more permanent than any crisis, is something the financial press doesn’t really mention:

People aren’t having any children[…]
Added: the boomers are saying bye sayonara

The generation that inflated every asset class for 40 years through automatic 401k contributions is, somewhere around now, flipping from net buyers to net sellers[…]

That’s why the central planners of the world turned toward mass immigration. You need consumers to keep the GDP growth going, and with fewer children, there were going to be fewer consumers. Of course, the problem is that the macroeconomic models don’t account for quality of consumer, so it’s only very recently that the mainstream economists have begun to realize that lending to immigrants from grasshopper cultures is absolutely guaranteed to crash the banking system because none of those loans will ever be repaid

And this is just on the consumption side. Imagine what lowering IQ, time preferences, and productivity does on the production side, although you don’t need to imagine it anymore. We already know what a calamity diversity and inclusion have turned out to be for the US corpocracy

Indeed, based on a 2025 Danish study, it may even be necessary to ban paid female employment. Such a policy would indubitably be sexist, anti-feminist, and currently illegal in most Western countries. But no one living in any society that elects to show up for the future is going to care what the norms of a few long-dead 21st-century societies happened to be

Egalitarianism is already conceptually dead. It won’t be many more decades before people stop believing in it

Lori Alexander #sexist #fundie twitter.com

[in response to women who turn down men’s sexual advances]

God gave men a strong sex drive so they would want to marry and procreate. He didn’t create birth control, & He warns about the consequences of fornication. His will is perfect for us and the health of nations. Stop fighting what God has created and ordained. Embrace it instead.

Matt Forney #sexist #crackpot returnofkings.com

Ayn Rand once wrote, “Show me the woman [a man] sleeps with and I will tell you his valuation of himself.” If this applies to American men in general, our nation is rocketing towards Gomorrah like a fat kid on a water slide. No less than an authority than the New York Times has declared that booty is in, with pop singers and movie stars like Iggy Azalea and Beyonce showing off their asses and music videos for songs like “Booty” providing a butt buffet for America’s simpletons.

This is not a good thing.

I don’t mean to trample on anyone’s preferences, but America’s increasing ass addiction is further evidence of our decline as a society. Not only is booty worship associated with primitive, backwards cultures, but America’s burgeoning butt cult is yet another expression of female narcissism. By cheering on the likes of Meghan Trainor and other ambassadors of ass, you are helping perpetuate the degradation of women into fat, self-centered sluts.

Ass, Class And Status

It’s universally accepted that a man’s preferences in female beauty are indicative of his class and attitude. Historically, ass fixations were considered trashy, because butts signify the primal and hearken back to our animal origins. Boobs were associated with working-class men (think the original Playboy), while legs were the preference of the upper classes because they signified good breeding (since height is an indicator of good nutrition and genes).

This was confirmed by a recent Pornhub study analyzing the types of search strings their sites get. The map below displays whether boob or butt searches are more popular in certain countries:

image

As you can see, asses are preferred in Africa, South America, and the Middle East, regions known for their crushing poverty and corrupt governments. The civilized, wealthy nations of the world, from Europe to Asia, prefer boobs. Egypt and Argentina, historically the most advanced countries on their respective continents, also prefer boobs. The U.S. is the only first world nation in the Butt column, and that’s primarily because of our large black and Latino populations.

Looking at a state-by-state breakdown, we see the exact same pattern. The states where boobs reign are the whitest ones, as well as the ones with the highest quality of life, the least corrupt governments, and the lowest crime rates. Vote Ass if you enjoy paying 50 percent of your taxes to a government that can’t even pave the roads or protect you from criminals, while your city devolves into a third world cesspool.

Those Phat Asses Aren’t For You

So maybe you think my civilizational explanation is cracked out, or you just don’t care about the fate of the U.S. But even if that’s the case, there’s still a very good reason to oppose the MSM’s booty crusade: it’s feeding the self-absorption of young women.

The reason why asses are considered low-class is because developing a big ass requires less discipline then any other female beauty standard. The butt is the only part of a woman’s anatomy that improves when she gains weight. Contrary to what fat girls think, getting obese doesn’t make for better boobs, because a fatty’s tits are veiny, distended, and saggy. Absolutely no effort is required for a girl to get a big ass; perfect for a nation in which the majority of women are turning into cellulite-ridden hambeasts.

This is the most troubling aspect of America’s butt cult: virtually all the ass anthems being pushed by the media are paeans of self-love. Take the video for Meghan Trainor’s “All About That Bass” as an example:

Trainor is a fat white girl rapping about how she’s fine just the way she is, how beauty standards that expect her to cut down on the bon-bons are oppressive, and denigrating women who have “stick figure,” “Barbie doll” physiques. The message to girls is clear: don’t work on yourself, don’t take care of your body, and any man repulsed by your undulating stomach flab and toilet paper-infested asscrack is a meanie misogynist.

The same attitude is present in last year’s other major butt worship song, Jennifer Lopez’s “Booty.” When that video first came out, I was talking about it with some friends and one commented on how anhedonic and unsexy it was. I told him that “Booty” wasn’t supposed to be sexy. J.Lo and Iggy Azalea aren’t flaunting their butts because they want to look hot for men, they’re doing it out of narcissism: “You better worship my big booty, or else!”

Contrast these music videos to Sir Mix-a-Lot’s “Baby Got Back,” which ass-lovers point to as an example of how butts have gone mainstream. “Baby Got Back” is sexy and appealing because it was sung from a man’s perspective, about what men liked. It wasn’t even representative of black America’s tastes, because the majority of attractive black women didn’t emphasize their butts, even going all the way back to the sixties (NSFW link).

The current crop of ass anthems are by women, about women, and are about shaming men for not giving these women the deference they think they deserve. What you prefer as a man is irrelevant: big booty is the only item on the menu, and if you don’t like it, you can starve for all they care.

Planet Of The Asses

It’s fine to prefer booty, but the left never stops at tolerance. Gay rights were originally sold to the public with the “tolerance” canard, but in the year 2015, Christian bakers are getting sued left and right for refusing to make gay wedding cakes. Eventually, if you don’t worship the flabby ass of every narwhal lumbering down the street, you’ll be treated like you’re personally jamming your finger down the throat of every bulimic in America.

Again, if you like asses, there’s no problem with that. But the booty cult being pushed by the mainstream media isn’t the product of what men want, it’s yet another way to bolster the already inflated egos of women. Iggy Azalea, Meghan Trainor and their ilk are horsewomen of the female narcissism apocalypse, slipping poison in the ears of this nation’s already slovenly, slutty, selfish girls.