#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

rowaasr13 #sexist #psycho mmo-champion.com

Alright so let's put this into terms you can understand.
A guy could walk into the party, take a date rape pill himself, lay down buck-naked and spread-eagle on a bed before he passes out and still be completely 0% at fault.
Better? Because both are true, it doesn't mean they weren't stupid actions, but when someone is raped it is due to the aggressive actions of another person NOT their own. Doesn't matter the gender, or the situation.
Na-ah. Millions of people have aggressive sex every day. It is our biology. It is just some stupid attention whore cunts learned how to gain notoriety in some modern societies while doing so.

So, in your opinion, what is required for something not to be treated "rape"? Signed waiver?
Should next time I come home late and see my wife sleeping in some sexy wear be afraid of touching her because she clearly didn't gave me any consent yet?

That is a FANTASY, and it is NOT rape by any means. Men have the fantasy too.

The only difference between "fantasy" and "rape" is whatever she liked her fucker or not. And that's royally fucked up part.

Originally Posted by Crissi
"Consent need not be expressed, and may be implied from the context and from the relationship of the parties, but the absence of objection does not of itself constitute consent." Wikipedia

[Url=https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/1276650-CNN-grieves-that-guilty-verdict-ruined-%E2%80%98promising%E2%80%99-lives-of-Steubenville-rapists?p=20548464&viewfull=1#post20548464]Being at underage party with alcohol drinks is a "there's very likely there will be sex" situation in my book. Going there instead of staying away is pretty much implied consent. And please, don't spout nonsense "she couldn't know that!" Pretty much every girl know that at about 13 yo nowadays if not sooner.

nahini #psycho #sexist arstechnica.com


I'm perfectly willing to admit being attracted to minors, and I challenge anyone who thinks that makes me the least bit perverted, or "sick" (I'm 25, btw). When girls sexually mature around 12-14, calling a 16 year old a "child" and trying to stigmatize the idea of being sexually attracted to her is rather dubious, to say the least. I am not, however, attracted to actual children...

Originally posted by tpg0007:
Maybe we should rethink the definition of "children."
In short, this.

------

I understand parents dislike the idea of their girls having relationships with older men, and let's be honest, parents tend to get apoplectic whenever the sexuality of their daughters (especially their daughters) is concerned, regardless of the guy's age. Fine. I'm not a parent, but I understand being protective. On the other hand, maintaining that a 15 or 16 year old girl, while no doubt somewhat immature, is incapable of having consensual sex, is nonsense.

So, Pamel, in your story, there's difficulty, because the man was already in a position of power, authority, and influence over the girl, so that may complicate things. How can anyone tell the degree to which she was coerced by him? It may be impossible, even for her, to know. I'm not sure the best way to deal with those cases. Keep in mind, however, that there's certainly an amount of coercion in every human interaction, especially where sex is concerned. So, it's muddy. I am of the opinion, however, that it's entirely possible for a 30 year old and a 15 year old to have a free, non-coercive, consensual sexual relationship. And if they do, the 30 year old shouldn't be demonized or called a pervert. It just might be tricky to tell whether the relationship is, in fact, non-coercive. I'll grant you that. Let's be clear, though (just as an aside). Even if it is, it doesn't make the 30 year old a pervert. It may make him an asshole and a bully, but there's nothing perverted (or paedophilic) about being attracted to a sexually mature individual, regardless of the age difference involved.

Ben Shapiro #ableist #conspiracy #crackpot #pratt #psycho #racist #sexist #transphobia #wingnut thebulwark.com

The Daily Wire Is Quietly Shooting a Pro-ICE Movie. We Got the Script.

The film, with the working title Pawn Shop, centers on an Antifa siege of a Minneapolis pawn shop amid anti-ICE unrest. On one side: an ICE agent joined by a group of pawn-shop employees and customers. On the other: a rabble of progressive protesters, and eventually a bloodthirsty MS-13 death squad, both intent on rescuing a Hispanic man detained by ICE. It plays out exactly how you’d expect it would.

The film’s first minutes will likely get the most attention. As Pawn Shop opens, two ICE agents in Minneapolis arrest the Latino man, later revealed to be an MS-13 boss. Dimwitted liberal activists film and scuffle with the agents as they try to take their suspect away.

Then the film’s Renée Good stand-in enters, slamming her Subaru into the ICE van. Described with the subtlety of a brick as “MELANIE (40), a fat blue-hair,” the woman, blasting NPR, revs up again and fatally hits ICE agent “Juan” with her car. Then his ICE partner, “Mike,” shoots her in a justifiable killing.

Melanie reacts to the drawn gun with panic...

She MASHES on the gas as she throws the car into reverse, accidentally SLAMMING Juan out of the way. He goes flying into the gutter, bleeding...

And as the car reverses, Mike FIRES TWICE through the

windshield...

The first shot takes the [sic] Melanie in the neck, below her covid

mask. The second in the head, above her covid mask.

Blood SPLATTERS on her PASSENGER’s (40s, female, overweight)

forehead and matching covid mask.

From there, the ICE agent drags his suspect into the pawn shop, with an Antifa mob hot on their heels. The stage is now set for a siege, during which numerous Molotov cocktails will be thrown and shotgun shells will fly. Rest assured that no liberal piety will survive.

Inside the pawn shop, we meet its grizzled Hispanic owner and his son, newly back from college and majoring in Chicano studies. Much to his father’s chagrin, the son is dressed in a Che Guevara shirt and “listening to a POP SONG unfitting for a man.” A pawn-shop security guard quips they’re lucky the boy didn’t get a sex change.

RoadRunner8195 #sexist #psycho #dunning-kruger reddit.com

The truth is that the Jane Doe supporters wish she was assaulted more than wishing she was not, which proves their compassion is not out of care for her but just performative.

There has been so much back and forth regarding the Cornell 7 allegations. The side which is supportive of Jane Doe loves to preach about believing her, and the other side is quite skeptical and/or calling it a false accusation. The odd thing is people care more about being right on the internet than about her well being, and are therefore rooting for her to have been raped, and would be disappointed if she wasn’t. This proves these people don’t care about her but are just being performative so they can shout “I am Jane Doe” for attention and hating on men, similar to picking the bear.

David J. Stewart #sexist jesusisprecious.org

The Snobby Bob Jones Nurse Who Will Never Find a Husband

One thing that bothers me about a woman, more than anything else, is a woman who cannot stand upon her own two feet! Most religious women follow the crowd, going along to get along with their religious employer at a church. They cannot think for themselves. I remember attending church a few years ago, and a female staff member (a Bob Jones Graduate) met me in the church parking lot with an elderly man that is her friend. She was too much of a coward to approach me by herself. I liked her but was going through a very rough time in my life and didn't reach out to her. I wish I had. In hindsight, I really liked her a lot (and still do). A friend of hers confirmed to me that she liked me. A couple years later, after being driven out of the church over my King James Bible only beliefs, I met up with her one day while walking along the ocean. I hadn't seen her for a long time, but I had thought about her often and missed her. My heart leaped when I saw her.

So I wrote her and finally poured out my heart to her, explaining how I felt about her. She cold-heartedly wrote me back, coerced by her church employer, telling me not to contact her again. That was the end of that. What a coward! She lied and said she never liked me, but I know as sure as I'm saved that she did. How can a woman like that with poor character make a good wife? She can't even tell the truth, think for herself, or stand upon her own two feet! I wouldn't be surprised if she never found a husband! The guy before me dumped her, because her attitude is all wrong! I like what Pastor Jack Hyles often said, “To lose something in the will of God is to find something better!”

I have never seen her since. I have wanted to contact her many times, but I cannot after she forbade me to do so. I'm not stupid. One day when she is an old maid, having never been married, with no children of her own, she'll lie to herself, like a lot of foolish women do, saying retarded things to herself like: “Well, it must not have been God's will,” et cetera. But the truth will be that she did that to herself, making foolish decisions throughout her life. One day she will realize that she grew old, and passed up a real opportunity to have a husband that genuinely cares about her. I still pray for her often, for God's will to be done in her life. Professed Christian women are so foolish today, living in The Twilight Zone. The random photo to the left is what she'll probably look like in 25 years! No woman can be truly happy who does not fulfill her God-given purpose to be a HELP MEET, pursuing a career instead of serving the Lord by a husband's side (Genesis 2:18). If she does marry, she'll never find a more sincere man with a loving heart than me!

Anon #sexist #homophobia lolcow.farm

Their core belief is not having any beliefs, just whatever gets them closer to their goal, namely, pussy.

They only care about the security they get through submission to authority, as the male always figures his allegiance to whatever/whoever he’s pledged himself to guarantees him the ability to reproduce eventually. If he didn’t believe this, he wouldn’t do it at all.
The authority these men want most is a sexy underaged mommydom dedicated to the task of draining him of his cum (the malfoid), which would be his most optimal path to reproduction. No middleman, quite literally. Since these unicorns hardly ever appear in reality, and leave the common man desperate and wanting, anyone and anything can hijack the male submission drive and completely obliterate whatever “beliefs” he previously purported to have. Charlatans plunder his wallet, capitalists plunder his labor, fags plunder his butt, Etc.

The male is like a little sperm swimming steadfast into darkness, using the programming that propels it towards the egg, despite the fact it’s is in another man’s intestines, or a monitor lizard, or a hole in a couch cushion.

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

Cosmic dualism fallacy. Because moids are specialist mutants, they need to believe that women are their negative "counterpart" with features that are "fully opposite". It's one of the ways they fight the nagging little voice telling them that they are merely an offshoot of a standard, complete human form, not an equal puzzle piece in a symmetrical, complementary set of two. This applies to both behavior (femininity and masculinity meme) and appearance.

Because of this, their idea of beauty will always be incomplete, and everything they create will always be ugly, imperfect and uncanny in some way, no matter how hard they try. If you gave a moid a hypothetical unlimited ability to make people, he'd make a "perfect" waifu utilizing his own peferred parameters, then dump her for a naturally occurring beauty as his creation begins to look grotesque and mutilated by comparison. This is one of the reasons why a male plastic surgeon would be an enormous risk. It's not that they're lazy, bogging you on purpose, or sadly limited by current state of the art. It's that they are literally, biologically incapable of making you beautiful. They think they know what beauty is, and then don't find it beautiful, because it's not.

Myu3u / kawaiigardenerwolf #sexist tumblr.com

(@myu3u): My family always get pissed off when I claim I would rather die than birth a male, like sorry I care for my life and sanity

(@kawaiigardenerwolf): i mean male fetuses have been proven to be more resource intensive than female fetuses. Here's a quote from University of Cambridge:

"Male baby pregnancies are more likely to result in complications, possibly because they grow faster in the womb and require more nutrients and oxygen than supplied by the mother through the placenta”

(@myu3u): So, actual parasites

(@kawaiigardernerwolf): from the moment of conception yea basically

CADdie,Squishyfish,Chickenlegs #sexist #psycho arstechnica.com

CADdie: “I lost my virginity at age 18 to a 14 year old girl who was more mature and experienced than me, and she never turned out to be a mental wreck later.

If a 14 year old girl would want to have sex with me today, I'd probably do it.”


Squishyfish”I should just point out that there exist cultures in which parents arrange for their children to have sex with older members of the community, as part of a rite of passage into adulthood.

I would assume that if sex with an older person was innately harmful, these cultures would have self-destructed long ago.”

Chickenlegs:”What pisses me off the most is when you get these teens, say 15 or 16, and they go around sleeping with as many men as they feel like it. Then they sleep with some guy that is like 21 and people point to the guy like he did something wrong. Hey, I say if a teenager is going around getting guys to sleep with em then put the blame where it belongs, right on the teen. None of this, "Oh, he is 21, he should know better." Ill tell you what he knows, he knows that an attractive young energetic girl with boobs wants to sleep with him. Thats what he knows.”

Incel Wiki #sexist #wingnut incels.wiki

A NEETcel is either (1) someone who believes that their status as a NEET is a major contributor to their inceldom or (2) someone who is an incel and also is a NEET, either because they see no point to working (since they can't betabuxx), or for other reasons. Many incels are discriminated against in the workplace for their looks, so it becomes a contributing factor in why they become NEETs.

Some incelists are NEET for political reasons as they don't wish to contribute taxes to a purse which disproportionately benefits normies, Chads and Stacy's r just sex-havers in general. These incelists argue that a large proportion of single mothers who produced children from their wild hooking-up during their teens and 20s eventually become single mothers on welfare. As such, since incels weren't invited to these hooking u parties, incelists wonder why they should pay for the after-effect of a party they were excluded from. To incelists, this makes about as much sense as paying the rent of a random person you don't know, halfway across the world. Others have chosen the NEETcel path out of misanthropy, and subsequent unwillingness to engage in a society they feel has rejected them.

Megyn Kelly #sexist mediamatters.org

From the September 30, 2026, edition of SiriusXM's The Megyn Kelly Show

MEGYN KELLY (HOST): It's just so wrong. Again, why? Why does the media choose to call her Jane Doe and choose to name the men. I'm just going to tell you right now, if her identity is revealed, I am going to name her. I am going to name her

I am not OK with the accused having their identities plastered all over the newspapers and accusers getting this blanket of protection from the courts and/or the media. Now the courts I can't do anything about, but the media I can

Why? Why does she get the blanket of anonymity? Even if she's a victim. I'm sorry, but that's just — that doesn't make any sense

If you really want anonymity, unfortunately you have to stay out of the court system. If you file a civil lawsuit asking for money damages, you are in the court system and your name is as fair game as the names of the defendants. And I just — I don't think we can continue this farce of pretending all accusers are actual victims whose identities must be protected and all defendants are presumed guilty, and their lives will be ruined the second the complaint is filed. This is fucked up. I'm just done with this

epicenterdefacto #sexist #psycho waivio.com

Young Man Is Wrongfully Punished For Experiencing His First Love

1. Juvenile-Related Sex Laws Without Any Sense Of True Justice

As I was browsing around on YouTube last night, I came across this one video of a sentencing hearing involving a young man who had sexual intercourse with his girlfriend four different times. Did he forcibly rape her? No. Did he coerce her into having sex? No. Did he sexually molest her? No. Did he even groom her? No. His girlfriend was his first love.

Nonetheless, none of those facts made any difference to the judge. This young man had already pleaded guilty to a sexual offense, and the only thing that she was interested in was the fact that he was 23 years of age and his girlfriend was only 12 years old. Now, I know what many of you are going to say, but watch the video first and then form your own opinions about this matter.

The name of the 23-year-old defendant is Hector Enrique Laura Sanchez. He is an immigrant from Honduras. You may think that a 23-year-old man is way too old to be intermingling with a 12-year-old girl. However, back when the late Loni Anderson, an actress, was 12 years old, she dated a 22-year-old man. Her parents allowed the courtship. Of course, the late Ms. Anderson was a full-figured woman by then.

The criminal defense attorney even stressed that the 12-year-old girl that Mr. Sanchez had sexual relations with was physically precocious for her years and had an enriched sexual vocabulary. He also pointed out to Judge Stephanie Boyd that the girl told the police that she had been the one to seduce Mr. Sanchez rather than the other way around. The girl's mother didn't want him to go to jail or prison.

Some of you may argue that this girl was just a child. According to medical science, she wasn't. There is a world of a difference between a 12-year-old girl who is an adolescent and a prepubescent child who may be only 5 or 6 years of age.

Jacob Wohl #sexist #conspiracy instagram.com

I use a locking briefcase. Whenever I walk through an airport or an office building with it, people stop and compliment it. They say “Wow! you never see those anymore” — The removal of the locking briefcase from civil society was a feminist conspiracy. Back in old days, if a man had an extra cell phone, it would go in the briefcase when he got home. Love note from his secretary? Locking briefcase. Hockey tickets along the ice for him and his friends? Locking briefcase. Thanks to the feminists, men are now expected to carry around a soft, suede bag (preferably in a feminine color). It’s time for men to take their privacy back. Get a locking briefcase today!

David J. Stewart #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

There was a day in America when nearly ALL women wore dresses (before TV came along). A woman who wore a pair of pants 100 years ago was considered a whore. Today, women who wear dresses are often looked down upon with contempt by other women. They're jealous! They want the femininity which they've lost, but can't have it and still be the feminist she-men they are. You can't have it both way ladies. Women today have lost their femininity because of feminism and pornography in society. Pornography cheapens a woman's worth in society.

Truth Mum #conspiracy #transphobia #sexist pittparents.com

I also make no apologies or have any doubt that this was a master plan by the powers that should not be to indoctrinate our children, demasculate men/masculate women...remember a nation of weak men is easy to control, destroying the feminine has always been part of the plan. The Plandemic was introduced for this very purpose, and many others unfortunately.

To isolate people and get them glued to their screens, depressed, anxious and therefore unable to use discernment when being bombarded by these messages. Heck I was a "tomboy" growing up, two older brothers, loved sports, loved match box cars and all things boy. I wonder if I had been born later and was exposed to all of this if I would've made a similar choice! This was a whole scale attack perpetuated on humanity. Covid is a scam. Pandemic, scamdemic, however you wish to see it, it is part of the plan. Do yourself a favor and open your eyes to the lies and atrocities these bastards have perpetrated on humanity. You know what I did during "covidious?" Went down every rabbit hole under the sun and woke up, thank God!

Andrew Anglin #sexist #racist dailystormer.name

[From "Icelandic Women are Filthy Whores: Five Fast Facts You Need to Know"]

Each time we’ve gone live on the clearnet, I’ve given a story of the crazy and often psychologically painful things I’ve had to do to get the domain. I became a Russian 1337 haxxor. I married an Arabian call center princess. I dropped a verse on a Gucci Mane album.

This time though, it was a whole other story. To get the Icelandic TLD, the male population requested I come to the country to teach them how to deal with their women, who they described to me as “a bunch of filthy fucking whores.” They had read many of my articles on feminism, and told me that if anyone could fix the problem of Icelandic women, it was me.

I’ve been here in Iceland ever since .at went down, researching the problem and trying to come up with solutions. Every time I think I’m close to a breakthrough, however, I hit another roadblock.

What I can say is that in my time here, I’ve learned a whole lot about the nature of Icelandic women.

If you’re a man and you’re planning to travel to Iceland for any reason, you can never truly be prepared for the feminist hell that is Iceland, but it’s better if you know what you’re getting into.

Here are five fast facts you need to know.

1.) Icelandic Women will Not Shut the Fuck Up

Before you see her bloated, puffed-up face, her flabby gut or her glazed-over eyes, or smell the rank gin on her breath, you’re going to hear the Icelandic whore’s motor mouth.

[...]

2.) Icelandic Women are Fat

The only time an Icelandic woman stops running her mouth is when she is stuffing it with cakes and fried schnitzel.

Icelandic women make American women look thin. Hell, Icelandic women make whales look thin. One theory as to how they got this fat is that their fathers, husbands and brothers just started stuffing them with food to get them to stop talking.

Another theory is that they are so self-absorbed, that they can’t even imagine another human being existing – let alone the idea that another human being has vision and would be turned off by their arm-flaps and turkey-gobbles.

The worst part of all is how they’re all constantly rattling on about how they’re “on a diet.”

3.) Icelandic Women Cannot Suck a Dick Correctly

The men here don’t tell me about how their women won’t stop talking or how fat they are, probably because Icelandic men are a bunch of primitive farm people who have never been in a country like Afghanistan where women know they’d better keep their

lips zipped or they’re gonna be drinking oatmeal through a straw.

No: Icelandic men complain that their women cannot properly perform blowjobs. They say to me “I read in the magazine, the sucking is to bring joy, Mr. Andrew, but when my gf goes for the suck, I am lucky if I’m bored.”

Men here tell dark and harrowing tales of biting as well of Icelandic women drunkenly falling asleep mid-suck and locking their jaws. One man I spoke to had to have surgery.

However, the larger whole of women here outright refuse to suck dick at all, suffering from what is clinically known as “suck refusal” – a condition under which a feminist refuses to suck on dicks because she “doesn’t feel like it” or worse “thinks it’s degrading.” I have also heard stories of women texting during bjs.

4.) Icelandic Women Age Terribly Due to Smoking, Alcoholism and Drug Addiction

Even if you do find an Icelandic woman who isn’t a whale, she is still going to look 62 by the time she’s 26. This is because Icelandic feminist culture is utterly depraved, and involves absurd levels of smoking, drinking and shooting, snorting or smoking drugs.

[...]

5.) Icelandic Women Fuck Nigger

Most people do not actually know that “Iceland” is a country, and in fact think it is a part of an expansion pack for World of Warcraft.

That is indeed what I thought, until I was offered a domain there.

However, the few people who do know it is a real country know that it is famous because of a nigger with AIDS who fucked like 35% of the country’s entire female population.

[...]

Conclusion
Try to avoid Iceland, if at all possible.

The women are the worst in the world.

Furthermore, if you register a domain for a website in Iceland that some dumb bitch thinks is mean, they will call the police on you.

tteclod #sexist gab.ai

if you want to prevent a woman from straying, impregnate her, limit her employment prospects, & surround her with family

it worked for thousands of years

Mainländer & ScornedStoic #sexist incels.is

(Mainländer)

[Blackpill] Blackpill machine gun yesterday at college

I have this 18 yo ~4/10 mulatto/parda classmate who I'm in a group with for one of the final assignments, so yesterday we spent some time together and she was telling me and the other people from our group about her recent sexual and romantic adventures.

She is going out 1-3 times per week apparently and last time she went out she met a professor from our very college (but from STEM) and she told us he kept paying everything for her that night. Not cheap stuff either, they ate at a sushi restaurant (those are kinda expensive here), he payed for her drinks that night, he payed for her breakfast, but don't get me wrong, he didn't even kiss her. He asked her for a kiss and she refused, he invited her to go to Europe with him and she refused, he declaimed his feelings for her, she made fun of it and laughed.

Then she started telling us about her Chad onitis. She was crazy about him, desperately waiting for a message from him and not wanting to send one first, that typical playing games stuff. She unashamedly talked about how they met, kissed, found a room and had casual sex. She even used the Brazilian expression "amor de pica bate e fica" which is basically "dick love comes to stay", referring to how she fell for him after they fucked.

He told her that he "was afraid she might develop relationship expectations", JFL. And she also kept lamenting that she was sure he was probably fucking and kissing tons of girls on the side. This guy is at least a Chadlite, you can be sure of it.

Also, she told us that she already kissed the effeminate pretty boy from our class, as well as tons of other guys from college and from elsewhere, just in that less than one year time frame.

So that's it folks, women live life on debug mode with betas buxxing everything for them even while getting nothing in return, they get to bang pretty much anyone they want, which doesn't even make them happy though because Chad won't commit, let alone to someone vastly below looksmatch level, 18 year olds are already humongous whores and JFL at gigacopers who think they can find adult virgin and pure girls (any girl who's a virgin after 18 nowadays either has serious psychological or physical problems or is waiting for gigaultrachad to marry her which needless to say excludes anyone here).

Also, it's worth mentioning that this girl has no tattoos or piercings and even had a Christian upbringing. She's not some top 5% sluttiness type or anything, she's your average 18 yo college chick in 2019, in Brazil that is, it must be even worse in more feminist/degenerated countries from North America and Europe.

Great story, but yeah, this is the main takeaway, howthis is just average.

It's absolutely impossible to picture the average 18 year old chick thinking that this is wrong to do or something, it's literally just a basic interesting life for them, this is what makes life at all interesting and worth living and fun. (remember that they don't have any real ambitions and homemaker ambitions have been taken away from them in the 21st century)

Basically you'd have to fight tooth and nail (like that professor) and face social dissaproval, just to get with some 18-19 year old girl that isn't completely burned out on casual sex and jaded.

It's kind of massively over.

Yes, they have no reason whatsoever not to live like that in 2019, they are following their fucked biological inclinations. Even though it won't make them happy anyway. Society pays a huge price allowing females to become whores despite all the damage and upheaval it causes and this doesn't even make them happy, JFL. Cucks are the lowest of the low. Also, speaking of cucks, I don't feel bad for that professor, not even in my bluest pilled days I even considered buxxing women without getting nothing in return like that. He's part of the problem too.

image

I saw another version of in which several countries surpassed Brazil. Also, 17? JFL. Try counting only women now.

The words "blackpill machine gun at college" make me want to rewatch polytechnique when I get home.

Also, it's enraging that it's socially acceptable for foids to string along men like that. It's just a waste of resources for a creature that does not appreciate it anyway because it came from a sub 5 man.

Society is 100% gynocentric. Everything is set to cater to women. Women can pursue all their biological goals (alpha fucks beta buxx, stringing along, intrigues instead of violence, false rape allegations, getting with older men when they themselves get older) but men, especially ugly men, cannot (fuck young girls, especially when older, physical violence instead of intrigues and false claims, keep wanting younger women even when older).

(ScornedStoic)

I nearly died reading this shit.

Tbh.
There was a girl in my last year of highschool that came over to my desk to talk to me after a presentation I gave about said topic, and it was really weird. She was acting kind of flirty, but it was obvious she wasn't into me. i.e. no touching, kept her distance, wasn't really looking at me, but she was driving the conversation. Of course bluepilled me was enthralled so I kept going on with it, but then all of a sudden out of nowhere when class ended she up and basically bolted.

Later in the day I asked a female friend I was orbiting (remember, still pretty bluepilled) if she knew what the fuck that was about, since all the girls at that school knew each other. She told me with a deadpan look on her face, no inflection, no sarcasm or anything, that the girl I was talking about had fucked the entire graduating class (not me, of course,) and that there was a guy in that class I was in that she was trying to make jealous. Literally had nothing to do with me, but that's not the point, the point is a 17 year old girl according to another girl who knew her told me, the social outcast, that she'd fucked at least 20~ guys. I've seen her social media, and paid attention to how she interacted with guys afterwards, and I fucking believe it. There was literally nothing to gain for that "friend" in telling me, either.

Mark Bauerlein #wingnut #racist #sexist #transphobia #elitist amgreatness.com

If you’re invited to a friend’s house for Thanksgiving Dinner, and his daughter shows up and starts talking about America’s genocide of Native Americans, what do you say? Or if you’re in a discussion of classical education with other parents from your neighborhood and someone comments that classical education has a curriculum that lacks diversity and flirts with white privilege, how do you respond?
<...>
It sounds like a trivial occasion, but it’s really not. It happens too often not to be important. Woke attitudes have spread too widely for conservatives to avoid it. Not long ago, talk of “privilege,” “patriarchy,” and “transphobia” would have puzzled most Americans. Now, it echoes everywhere, in public and private and professional life.
It’s a social matter, a crossroads. “Do I speak my mind and annoy the present company? Or just nod and move on?”
<...>
It’s a losing game. Save your breath—don’t try to argue, don’t defend. The wokester is strong on belief and weak on knowledge, no matter how much she thinks she knows the real history of things. To be woke is precisely this claim of superior knowledge, a keener awareness than that of those still un-woke, asleep in their illusions of, say American greatness.
<...>
Instead of challenging the wokester’s knowledge, let’s go with the wokester’s knowledge and draw it out. Let her school us, let her show us her certainty and let’s accept her duty to instruct the ignorant. She wants to be a pedagogue; we shall accept the position of pupil.
<...>
In truth, wokeness doesn’t appeal to her intelligence and never did. It flattered her ego. Now, faced with questions directly related to what she has just stated, the certitude crumbles and the ego collapses. You have asked her for knowledge, and she hasn’t replied. She can’t.

You’ve won. It’s time to hum a few bars of Beethoven, mouth some words of Polonius, praise the dimensions of Greek columns, and detail what the Comanches did to their neighbors, and see if she’s ready to listen.

Flushed Guilt #sexist slate.com

I Got Mad and Flushed My Wife’s Birth Control
I think she’s being unfair to me about it.

Dear PrudenceThree months ago, my wife and I had a calm disagreement over whether we should start a family. A few nights later, I replayed the conversation in my mind and got extremely angry about it. I went into the bathroom, flushed her birth control pills down the toilet, left the empty case on the counter, and then went back to bed. When I woke up in the morning, I was ashamed of myself, but I knew she had already seen what I’d done. She never confronted me about it but has displayed strange behavior since then. She is unusually quiet and acts withdrawn. Her body language has changed, and although we still have sex regularly, it is different than it was before. In addition, she is constantly taking phone calls in private and leaving the house on superfluous errands. I realize I made a mistake, but I don’t think it’s fair that she continues to punish me for it by avoiding me. I want to ask my wife for us both to give up our smartphones and share one car so we can work on our communication. I don’t want to fall into the same trap of doing something rash and then regretting it later. How can I talk to my wife calmly about her behavior?

Submitter’s note: I first heard about this here:
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2020/08/15/the-unfixable-man/. PZ’s comments are much better than Prudence’s IMO.

AccountError #sexist #psycho incels.is

Tribute to Harvey Weinstein

One of the few old and fatcels to ascend, he used his fame, money and status to ascend and had everything go 180 degrees with ungrateful foids. He gave women easy paths in careers for the minuscule price of sucking his dick, but alas, foids are low IQ and hated that he was uglys, so they all dogpiled on him with false accusations.

The media has already painted him as a monster so it's over for him buddy boyo

Goodbye Weinsteincel

Canadian Anon #crackpot #kinkshaming #pratt #sexist #transphobia #wingnut archive.wakarimasen.moe

I'll still never get this.
It's one thing to take hormones, keep your dick, and hopefully find a fetishist to date but the mentality in thinking anyone would ever want that axe wound is another world of insane.

This. I "transitioned" but the reality was I was forcing my bdsm goth sissy fetish on people in public because literally no one could or would stop me. Natalie Mars style hair, heavy doll face make-up, chastity cage, black denim straightjacket with belts and locks all over it, black skull print dress, etc. I thankfully looked like an attractive tranny but it was a ton of work and I knew I was never a real woman and it was just demented fetish shit. I stopped after doing it less than a year. I absolutely loved all the attention I could get and it definitely got me laid much easier than when I was presenting as male but FFS anyone who is mentally ill enough to literally think GRS is a valid option probably should be removed from the gene pool. That's going to massive amounts of trouble and ongoing medical issues for zero return. I didn't even like having to put make-up on every single day, I can't imagine anyone wanting it enough.....

It was to get what I wanted from the start. I took hormones for about a year. What I was doing is called transmaxing; sissy incels who are tired of not getting laid do it to get fetish sex all the time. It was an absolutely calculated move to advance my career and be practically immune to criticism in this progressive shit hole of a country while forcing my feminization fetish on the public. I would post pics but I don't want to dox myself even though I look almost nothing like I looked then as a man again. It only worked because of how heavy the goth makeup I wore and how body forming the corset and fashion I wore. For a tranny I'd say I was about a 7/10 when I put hours of effort daily (between workouts, shaving my entire body and makeup). I just stopped doing it when it was no longer practical for me to do it. I miss doing it but it was literally so much fucking work it wasn't worth it just for the fetish and I never believed I was a woman.

Faceless Goy #sexist vnnforum.com

On a serious note.... Women in the '40's and 50's probably weren't even half as bad as most of the cunts people call "women" today. You guys need to take a break and find a nice, virgin Christian girl. I mean a real one, one that actually attends church every Sunday. Not those lying hypocrite women that say they're christian by default, and say they "pray" and talk about "God" and "Jesus" being on their side, and then go and suck dick during the weekdays. Settle down with her and have lots of White babies.

malacki655 #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Female privilege is a real thing

I am writing this after just finding out that Christa Pike got her execution paused at the last minute. Yes, Christa Pike, the woman who lured an innocent girl into the woods, tortured her to death, kept a piece of her skull as a trophy and tried to kill another inmate in prison. A federal court is halting her execution to consider whether her abusive childhood was taken into account. No joke, look it up.

And of course, we can't forget the Lindsay Clancy case where a woman strangled her three children to death with premeditation but was almost acquitted (and might get the case dismissed) because boohoo she felt a bit sad.

And finally, you have the Cornell hoax where a woman willingly took drugs, alcohol and engaged in group sex with some frat dudes (check the original police report) only to take back her word and claim she was forced in order to save her reputation. Now the internet wants to lynch the men accused.

Do you see the common thread in all three cases? I'll tell you, it's women not being held responsible for their actions. No matter what they do, they are the victim. And that is the conceit of feminism. It tells us women are equal to men, therefore deserving equal rights, but also women can't be held equally responsible for their actions. Well guess what, rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. If you want the same rights as men, don't complain if you are held to the same moral or legal standard! Abolish female privilege now!

theson #sexist #psycho #dunning-kruger incels.is

[Based] High IQ idea: quantizing pussy

Users who quantize pussy by using terminology such as "a crumb of pussy", "an ounce of pussy", "tons of pussy" are high IQ. Toilets are pretending like sex is not a resource they have a monopoly over that can be redistributed, but rather some abstract spiritual thing that is bestowed by the gods upon the worthy. The traditional view of sex is similar to the divine right of kings to rule, where women's command of the pussy resource cannot be brought into question. Quantizing pussy and discussing dating in terms of markets desmystifies and democratizes sex which can be a catalyst for social change. Reddit toilets get mad when you quantize pussy, that's how you know this is a legit tactic.

IceMountainFire #sexist icemountainfire.wordpress.com

[NOTE: Posting this in two parts to make it at least somewhat readable.]

Men Are Not Broken [Part 2]

The evidence for male love for death and destruction is overwhelming. But it would be wrong to assume that this is the end of the argument, that we just have to accept men’s natural dangerousness and adjust to it.

This we do anyway: taking self defense classes, keeping separate bank accounts when married, telling girls not to go with strange men. This is something even the most right-wing women do, however illogical and ineffective their precautions often seem. This is nothing particularly feminist. To – literally or metaphorically – carry a weapon in a world of predators is the bare minimum, not radical. (Many right-wing women carry literal weapons, something radical women should take in consideration for themselves as well.)

But unlike right-wing women and collaborators who simply accept male behaviour or at best demand cosmetical, individual change, Radical Feminists dig deeper. Beside the overwhelming evidence for male dangerousness we also find overwhelming evidence that men actually control their dangerousness when it suits them.

The picture of the man who just can’t help his nature is peddled by patriarchal apologists: The poor man was nagged and mocked by his shrew of a wife and couldn’t take it anymore. The poor man only follows his evolutionary instinct and raped her to assert his dominance. The poor man is the victim of political oppression, he just had to attack women to cope with his feeling of powerlessness. But women’s experiences make it very clear that men are highly selective towards whom they are ?losing control?.

Abusive men don’t attack their nagging and mocking male bosses with their fists. They don’t ambush their male boss on the toilet and rape him to get back at him. When they are oppressed and exploited, they don’t kick the boss from one corner of his office to the other. When their favourite team loses, they are not seeking out the quarterback to use him as a punching bag for their frustration. In a crowded train, they are not driven by some evolutionary instinct to go for the throat of their fellow male who enters their personal space or bares his teeth to them.

Men also are perfectly able to dose their violence. Male violence against women and children follows an escalating cyclic pattern. The escalation is a conscious strategy: How much will she be able to take? How far can I go? How many of my depraved fantasies can I make come true? (We observe the same deliberate escalation in sadomasochism. It is embraced there as ‘slave training’.)

Men are planning their crimes and they are able to cover them. Losing control is adverse to both. Someone who loses control does not build an air-tight terror regime in his own home, by and by cutting off his wife’s and children’s means of refuge and lowering the bar of ?reasons? for his violent outbursts. Someone who loses control does not take upon him the logistics of building torture chambers or digging up graves. Someone who loses control does not buy a new hammer before he goes out again and again to prey on women.

Men can control themselves just fine. They make the active choice to act on the impulses their faulty nature gives them.

So, where does that leave us?

Right-wing women openly collaborate to secure their individual position. If they are just compliant enough, they think they will be allowed to sit at the men’s table. If they are just submissive enough, they will be taken care of and be rewarded.

Many liberal feminists de facto do the same in a more hidden manner, while they are touting an empty ideology of equality. For them, maleness by and itself has worth. Therefore, to them, males can be potential allies, partners, lovers, teachers, people worthy of shaping society. They can even be women. If only they were a bit more friendly, a bit more peaceful, a bit more loving, a bit more loyal, a bit more equality-oriented.
This is nothing new. Contrary to anti-feminist propaganda, ever since feminism came into being – even more so, ever since women started to take action against their miserable situation, pre-dating organised feminism – an overwhelming majority of women preferred the equality approach, the liberal approach. Suffragettes argued that mothers were bringing voters into the world and thusly should be able to vote (6). ‘Bread and Roses’, one of the old songs coming out of the leftist women’s movement, includes the lines ?As we go marching, marching, we battle too for men; for they are women’s children, and we mother them again? (7). Second-wave ?women’s libbers? won out over their radical counterparts, enabling the backlash, sex positivism and the modern mantra of ?I choose my choice!”. Modern third/fourth-wavers with their love of sexual submission, trannies and He-For-She bring this sucking up to men to a logical conclusion.

Many women do this deliberately. They are sell-outs or anti-feminists making use of a liberal feminist mien to gain something from it. TV show creators like Shonda Rhimes or Lena Dunham make good money by catering to a certain urban, slightly feminist, female audience.

Other women are too much invested in the personal privilege they obtain for being compliant to patriarchy: They get to call themselves feminist, without having to change their personal lifestyle or to risk income, while they can keep any convenient patriarchal mind blankie, from religion to sadomasochism. A sizeable portion of these women explicitly doesn’t want to be any more radical. They want to have the privilege AND the sisterhood, without seeing the fundamental contradiction between the two.

But some of them are just not aware of what they are doing. This is an impression I got in the last years. There are plenty of campaigns on Twitter and in the blogosphere (like e. g. #Yesallwomen or Project Unbreakable) documenting the horrors women experience under patriarchy. The thousands of testimonies show two things: Women are reliable, sharp and precise observers of their own lives – and many women are somehow unable to draw radical and long-term conclusions from their experiences.

Instead, they are desperately begging men to be nicer to them because they want to be able to love them. Many liberal feminist suggestions aim in this direction, e. g. trying to make men not use pejorative language. As if a man who does not call them a bitch, a cunt, a whore or a dyke to their faces was somehow rendered incapable of thinking these things in his mind. (Personally, I prefer to be called names, because I instantly know whom never to turn my back to.) On the other hand, liberal women try to achieve their goals by appealing to men’s interests, e. g. when they declare that a ?liberated? feminist is better in bed that those other prudes. Their approach is to be inclusive, as if the oppressed class could make the oppressors relinquish their power by being nice.

These women are actually the ones I expect to do better. Women as a group are not stupid or naive or even close-minded. There is a reason why women are to be found at the forefront of every social cause imaginable. Women as a class – unlike the patriarchal lie of the ‘conservative woman’ proclaims – tend to be more open to new things and ideas than men. They are deeper thinkers than men, capable of understanding the ma-trix rather than the mechanics.

Women have to WANT to think, though. Hoping and wishing and begging is not enough.
The only realistic way for us to shape freedom for girls and women is seperatism. We as women need to put other women – any other woman – above everyone else. Men do that. Men can hate each others’ guts, but they will always close ranks towards women. It is time women do the same. This is the only way for women to make a better future: Stop catering to men in any way. Don’t make them lunch. Don’t listen to their problems. Don’t pick up their dirty coffee cups at work. Don’t have male friends. Give up male family. Don’t have children. Don’t talk to men at all if you are not forced to. Don’t live with them. Don’t sleep with them. Don’t step aside on the street. Don’t take gifts from them. Don’t interact with them online. Don’t imagine the ?perfect? man. Het women do that and when they don’t find any man living up to their ideals, they come to the conclusion that all men are scum while still clinging to their mental image of the perfect man. But the truth is, even the ideal man still is scum.

Start with a small change, e. g. not talking to the creepy neighbour anymore, and work your way. You will realise, the less interaction you have with men, the easier you’ll breathe. This also doesn’t make you more vulnerable. Think about the statistics. We are most likely to be attacked and/or raped by men we know: Family members, boyfriends and husbands, friends, acquaintances. Random attacks by strangers do happen, but they are nowhere as likely as becoming the victim of a man we already know. Living with a man, spending time with men, this is what endangers women most. We have been told the opposite, so this seems counter-intuitive. But it is a fact that the biggest threat to a woman, statistically speaking, is the man whom she thinks of as her protector.

Put women above everything else. Live alone or build separatist communities. Show solidarity. Look for hobbies done in female-only groups. Find the beauty in every woman. Stay away from men and their empty promises.

This is what I do. Cutting one man after the other out of my life. Prioritising Lesbians and women and girls. And I will keep writing about how liberal feminism hurts all of us, because for liberal feminists I still have hope. Not much hope, admittedly, but still hope.

khafail #sexist incels.is

Typical. why not actually prevent a portion of said suicides by spreading eagle for a few thousand less fortunate incels? attentionwhoremaxxing in full effect once again...a foid couldn't care less.

Brandon Herrera #ableist #elitist #psycho #wingnut #sexist #racist meidasnews.com

Republican congressional candidate Brandon Herrera implied COVID-19 “wasn’t bad enough” because not enough obese people died. The remarks were made during Herrera’s appearance on Elijah Schaffer’s Slightly Offensive on July 31, 2022, approximately a year before his first congressional run.

The conversation began with the participants discussing diversity on romance and dating shows and whether contestants’ racial preferences affected which people were eliminated before turning toward obesity. After the host said white men prefer to date white women over Black women, Herrera said, “I wonder if they’re solving for all variables here. Because there’s also like an obesity epidemic in the female Black community. So it’s like, okay, well, maybe …did you show them like a 100 random Black women and they just maybe don’t like obese people?”

After another participant, TimCast producer Lisa Jackson, then explained she hates obese people alleging she was being bullied by them when she was younger because she was skinny. Herrera then joked that perhaps they “hated you because there wasn’t enough of you to eat.”

Jackson then repeated that she hated “fat people” and “especially fat women” and called them “the most undisciplined, freaking disgusting people ever,” telling them to “stop putting food in your mouth.” Herrera appeared amused during the unhinged rant.

Host Elijah Shaffer then said, “Brandon’s like, shit, this is not helping my life.” However, Herrera then affirmed the sentiment: “No, no, I’m here for it, dude. I’m of the opinion COVID wasn’t bad enough because if you had something that just unfairly targeted fucking fat people, I’m here for it,” Herrera said. He then added, “I would have worn my mask nowhere on purpose.”

Herrera is the Republican candidate in Texas’ 23rd Congressional District, where he is running against Democratic nominee Katy Padilla Stout.

Flat_Earth_Shill #sexist reddit.com

I dont know what IQ test theyve used to "prove" women are now smarter than men but i guarantee it isnt g loaded whatsoever. Or they did the testing at 12-14 before the boys had hit puberty but after the girls had. Either one would make the results invalid. It would make no sense from an evolutionary perspective for women to be smarter than men. For 99% of human existence all women did was raise children while men did everything else. Also, if it was the case you would see more female inventors. 99% are male and mostly white.

Women are in colleges in greater numbers now for the same reason non whites (other than asians) are. Diversity quotas. I had an SAT score in the top .1% of the country and yet was denied scholarships to every ivy leage school i was accepted into (all of them). Their reason? They were "looking for a more diverse selection of recipients." So I didnt get to go because Im a white man.

Our education system is also tailored to girls. This is why almost all riddlin perscriptions are to boys. They are punished with microdoses of meth for not acting like girls.

The flynn effect is bullshit because it says just a few hundred years ago all europeans had mentally retarded levels of IQ. You cant run a functioning society with those people, look at Africa for a reference. Also, mass intelligence testing wasnt done until the first world war so everything before that is a guess.

Any gains made in IQ since then are due to nutrition. This is why i think you can get a malnourished persons IQ up about 10 points. However, no one is malnourished in the west and yet the racial gap here persists. Care to explain that to me? Im sure its still somehow whitey's fault.

...

I feel slighted because I did better than 99.9% of the country in everything academic and yet was denied scholarships, restricting my ability to attend the college of my choice even though I earned it, because of my race and gender.

I am not an introvert. I wasnt just great at academia. Im also a musician who sings and plays in a band and was quite the athlete. Im bigger than 99% of humans (if you dont count fat ones when it comes to weight) at 6'3 and 205lbs so that was a big advantage in highschool sports though.

Ive known many women all my life. Ive always casually dated and had many friends of every gender.

You have my motives entirely wrong. I do not feel insecure. I am not hurt by minorities performing better than me. For instance, i am completely comfortable with the fact that east asians are smarter than whites on average. I do not want to discriminate based on race for any reason. I only use the data to explain broad scale differences between groups. If it isnt inherent then it is white people's fault. As long as the latter is the dominant opinion among the public I will fight for the truth.

We will never see eye to eye. I believe my data is obviously right and fits with evolution and observable reality. You will most likely never break your egalitarian fantasy. It was fun though. You gave me a bit to think about and new things to incorporate into my arguments.

HITMENSPARADISE #sexist forum.bodybuilding.com

(bolding in original)

Vaginas are absolutely gross. Sex is primitive. Women should NOT be pursued (SRS)

Vaginas are gross. They stink, they are unaesthetic. There is nothing pleasing about them whatsoever. By the age of 20 the average vagina is so beaten up it's unrecognizable. Now lets get down to sex, sex is primitive. The act of sex is uncivilized if it's outside of a strong relationship. Females should NOT have sex outside of long term relationships and at most should have 1-2 partners their entire life. Sadly this isn't the case these days and females would rather take 400 alpha male cocks by the time she decides to settle down at the age of 70. Let me tell you this right now, any female that has had one 1-night-stand (JUST ONE) is a primitive vile ape with no self-control, period. In essence females should not be pursued.

crew6dawg0 #crackpot #racist #sexist reddit.com

RE: Why are so many young men acting asexual?

I'm 21 and it's like most of my peers (mainly average to low status dudes higher status dudes still act normal) they have no drive or desire to get with or be with women. They act asexual, beta and friendly it's so wierd their like robots, and they actively chastise dudes who actively go after women. It's such a depressing existence and their ok with it. I think it's just due to them being conditioned to their social status from a young age and don't have the self awareness to break out of it or try to change their situation.

Its a crap load of reasons. Part is the #metoo bullshit movement. Guys everywhere, in particular white males, hear non stop that they are rapists and pieces of shit and the problem with society and the world. They see famous people and politicians get shafted over ALLEGATIONS.

Guilt and shame - men are ashamed of being who they are and wanting what men want. Society shames men for being masculine, for seeing women as objects and wanting to fuck them, meanwhile women literally walk around dressed like whores and objectify themselves, but if we acknowledge it we're "part of the problem." Women are literally praised for everything they do, men are shamed.

Education on relationships. We've all seen the women magazines at the stores, "50 Moves to Blown you Mans Mind in the Bedroom." Or the TV shows, Dr.Phil, Steve Harvey, Oprah - all designed for women to educate themselves on dating and relationships. Men have far fewer resources out there, and when we do have a resource such as TRP, they get banned and called incels (even though we are getting laid and are the exact opposite, tf?)

Dating apps. The 80/20 rule runs supreme in dating apps. A lot of guys simply cannot compete with Chad and Tyrone, and when they get on dating apps they lose all hope. It can really bring you down when you've messaged hundreds of chicks and none of them seem interested.

Mike Stone #sexist #wingnut #homophobia #forced-birth #conspiracy henrymakow.com

Are you a woman? Would you like to know if your husband, boyfriend, or the guy you're dating is feminized? That's easy, give him the Fem Test.

1) Does he support legalized abortion?.
<...>
Since femininity is the opposite of masculinity, any man who favors legalized abortion is highly feminized. You'll likely never make a man out of him.
<...>
3) Does he support Israel in any form, or, worse, does he believe that Israel is "our greatest ally"?

This is similar to both of the above questions. It's impossible for a man in possession of masculine energy to support a country that terrorizes and murders women and children. (You could say that same about any man who supports our own military.) It's also a sign of incredible stupidity. Any man who does this is feminized to the point of no return.

4) Does he read or watch pornography?

This is a big one. As Henry has pointed out in the past, all pornography is homosexual. And as Saint Bruno has pointed out, anyone who persists in repeating the same sin has a demon in him. If your husband, boyfriend, or male acquaintance reads or watches pornography, he is either demon possessed, latently homosexual, or both. In other words, he is feminized to the point where you are NEVER going to make a man out of him.

5) Does he watch sports?
<...>
One of the reasons why sports are pushed so heavily in our society is to encourage feminized men to develop homoerotic "man-crushes" on their favorite athletes. The habit of men wearing sports jerseys of their favorite athletes comes from high school football, where girls wear the jersey of the boy they're dating. When you see a man wearing another man's jersey, he's telling the world that he's that player's bitch. If your man does this he is highly feminized.
<...>

9) Did he vote for Hillary Clinton, the impostor Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris in any of the last three presidential elections?

No explanation necessary. If your man did this, he is feminized to the extreme.

TostinoKyoto #sexist #psycho reddit.com

The Jane Doe in the Cornell University rape case could have made better decisions, and that should be okay to say out loud.

We've seemingly become so adamant to protect and comfort rape victims that we become angry when someone dares to suggest that the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions objectively played a role in their victimization. Apparently, this is commonly referred to as "victim blaming."

Whether we want to admit it or not, there are instances where blaming the victim of a crime to some degree, regardless if it's rape or not, is valid. None of us have any right or logic to live our daily lives and think that bad things can't happen to us, or that there aren't bad people who are waiting for us to slip up and let our guard down in order to take advantage of us.

It's not wrong to point out, in this case, that not enough was done on part of the victim to mitigate or minimize the risk of being sexually assaulted. Yes, we know people shouldn't rape, but pointing out the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions isn't the same as apologizing for or legitimizing rape like so many seem to think.

As much as I hate it, we don't live in a society that will ever be free from rapists. So maybe that's something we should keep in the back of our heads before we ever decide to go to a frat house full of horny men and drink and do ketamine? I don't understand the mindset that would think that anyone should be entitled to engage in risky behavior like that and be immune from danger or consequence.

Eivind Berge #sexist google.no

Facebook is evil

This week we learned that Facebook has kicked out Rune Øygard because he is a convict of the victimless sex crime of having a consensual sexual relationship with 14-15-year-old girl (there is nothing really unusual about this criminal case, which just shows run-of-the-mill misandry and sex-hostility at work, but it received a lot of publicity in Norway because Øygard is a politician). It turns out that Facebook has an actual policy against convicted sex offenders. To me, this crosses the line and demonstrates unambiguously that Facebook is an evil instrument of political correctness, in the business of enforcing feminist sexual taboos. I believe a private company such as Facebook should have the right to exclude anyone they want, of course, but this policy raises the issue of whether it is a good idea for us to spend so much of our time there. The issue is our willingness to give them power over us. Facebook's ostracism hurts because we have trusted them with too much power and now they abuse that trust, but the fundamental problem is our gullibility. The moral is: Don't make yourself too dependent on any morally corrupt entity. This is an inherent risk of centralized platforms, so we should probably try to avoid these whenever possible

Ultimatepassivecel #sexist #crackpot #quack incels.is

[Blackpill] You will be retarted for rest of your life ıf u dont lose your virginity by 16

16 is the age where your hormones are the most developed and active.Your hormones have a massive lust for any physical contact with opposite sex,ıf you dont satisfy them in time your hormones will start fucking your own brain up and ruin your communication skills.
This will end up in two ways ıf u are not a incel your iether BetaBuxx or get arrested for trying to talk a girl.
Foids are literally giving us mental illness

Kawaiigardenerwolf / spaguetti-betti #sexist #psycho tumblr.com

(Kawaiigardenerwolf)

I think ultimately at first we should see sex separated schools, women get a standard education where as males are tested to see if they qualify for standard education and eventual but limited interaction with female civilization, and the ones who disqualify are castrated and put in mines or some shit. Based on what I have studied with animals a good sex ratio is 10% male and 90% female. Just enough to prevent inbreeding.

(Spaguetti-betti)

eah, I agree they turn demonic at the start of puberty, because that's when their sexual desire and hormones flood their bodies and basically make them incapable of seeing women and girls as anything other than a source of great pleasure. Basically the orgasm for them is a high, and they constantly seek highs and have, in general more than woman, an addictive personality or nature. I have more thoughts on that, especially cause I have ADHD, I feel like I understand them better than the average woman. Castrating is not going to happen, cause males protect each other and they are in powerful positions currently. Average man hates feminists and looking for excuses to hate us more and inflict more violence on us. Average woman is a pick me and/or a boy mom, so will protect her precious rapist son from anything.

I agree with the 10% males thing. I wish it was 1%, but inbreeding :(

(Kawaiigardenerwolf)

I used to think it was puberty that made them demonic too. But in recent years and in my observation they are literally born fucked up. Usually a pre pubescent boy who is demonic is the result of environmental and genetic shortcomings, things which will cause girls to turn in on themselves, but boys to lash out. There are cases where literal 6 year old boys brought guns to school and shot their teacher or tried to strangle them. I agree with your averages, and in general I find males to be a lost cause, but I think it's entirely possible to uplift women, even ones in the depths of pickmeism, to overcome their self loathing, male worshipping programming. It might be harder to reprogram a woman who has birthed a male, due to imprinting, but I think young girls can be led down the path of self respect simply by being present as a female role model.

copecel2 #sexist incels.is

I catfished my so-called foid friend

I knew it was suspicious due to the circumstance that she had hoe behavior, I used to snap with her, sent video snaps and such. But nothing romantic happened because she never saw me like "the one."

Anyway, I decided one day to catfish her, and guess what? She started to be more receptive, opened up the convos quickly, rather than with my real account. She used to snap me all kinds of shit (which usually she didn't on my main acc), and found out somehow I was catfishing her.

I admitted that shit but because she was starting to treat me like one of her friends, like an emotional couch. She was angry a few weeks before and complained about that "catfish" which was me, and she said "well I'm gonna block him if he's not going to admit who he is."

A few weeks later and she still talked to me aka the catfish, she was snapping constantly and was curious and on the edge. Fuck off, bitch, I knew before that hoes will stay hoes, but at least admit you are a shallow cunt.

BTW, I blocked her because I got so angry at this bullshit. Stop justifying hoe behavior.

Maybe there's a man in her heart "the one" who she gets fucked by (in her heart), the bitch in heat.

Well, if there was a man, I would knew before. But hey, I know that she has a taste for muscular men with washboard abs, so I'm not surprised.

Anyway, in other words, water is wet.

Well I'm glad you wised up and came to the conclusion that countless amounts of men have come to for generations before us- that men and women cannot truly be friends. That there will always be one who wants more. Sucks that you had to figure it out in such a brutal way. All women are whores.

I knew it before, I just like to confirm my beliefs and remind myself everyday that blackpill will never change.

David J. Stewart #sexist #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

WOMEN DON'T BELONG IN THE MILITARY. You've got a bunch of men without a wife, tempted by any woman in their midst, and for a young woman to enroll into the military is asking for trouble! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out. America is a big mess today, because the ruling Luciferian powers behind the subversion of our society are doing everything they can to confuse, corrupt and destroy marriages and families. I am not going to go as far as to say women get what they deserve if they get burned or raped by male peers in the military, BUT THEY DO GET WHAT THEY ASKED FOR! No one deserves to be sexually assaulted, no one! But you get what you asked for, like Jessica Lynch, if you place yourself into harm's way. WOMEN DON'T BELONG IN THE MILITARY. A woman distracts men from their work. Men are attracted by sight. Men desire sex, much more so than women on average. For a woman to place herself in the midst of a bunch of lustful men is the epitome of stupidity! These dumb women demand for the law to protect them which it cannot do all the time. Men are going to be men, and men are sinners! Women will continue to be sexually harassed, raped and abused in the military, especially in this wicked characterless generation that has no fear of God. WOMEN DON'T BELONG IN THE MILITARY, THEY BELONG MARRIED, AT HOME HAVING BABIES AND PREPARING DINNER! As America changes its core values, laughing at the idea that a woman's place is in the home, our society is going to total moral ruin (homosexuality, abortion, nudity, substance abuse, suicide, theft, hatred, gender confusion and sexual immorality). WOMEN DON'T BELONG IN THE MILITARY.

ReturnOfSaddam #crackpot #sexist incels.is

The demonisation of incels is just "lol loser cant get laid" on a mass scale

I saw someone post some blackpilled statistic on a youtube comment and the first reply, with loads of upvotes was just "ok incel". Think about it, it's not actually discrediting ANYTHING written in the comment, it doesn't even address it, it basically just highlights it as a form of wrongthink ("this is what losers believe", "whoever wrote this can't get laid", "how dare you suggest women aren't wonderful").

You can see this with all forms of anti incel content - IT, articles written by SJWs about us, mainstream media shit. You will NEVER see them actually address the things we write about or the facts we present, it's always just ad hominem attacks on the authors, or when the author isn't available they'll write things like "just imagine what this guy looks like lol". It's pathetic.

Unfortunately I think this is a major reason why the blackpill will take ages to spread. Even when raw data is staring reddit cucks in the face (ironic considering they're usually so supposedly in favor of science, stats etc), they'll still deny it and shout INKWELL!!!!!!! There's no other explanation for not taking the blackpill, one look at a single Tinder experiment and anyone would be converted, but nope. The religious tier worship of foids will always win, it's literally similar to how religions in the past would just deny new scientific evidence for certain things and claim God works in ways we don't understand JFL.

Anonymous Coward #sexist godlikeproductions.com

Think about it... They kiss sluts who have kissed other men, sucked off other men with their red plump lips, they exchange tongues with women that have ran their tongue all over another man's member, they fuck women that have been fucked by other men, their cock exposed to the semen and cocks of other men, or in rare cases they are lied to by women claiming to be a virgin, so they can feel comfortable fucking that slut.

How can men be ok with this, such desperation just to get some pussy, they do not care that other men have already had their fill of the slut before, even chads are cucks putting their dicks in holes that other men have already placed in. It is disgusting and gay, and I feel sick just thinking about it, why don't you so called straight men just do faggot shit then, because that is all you are doing when it comes to women.

You are only getting used up leftovers, and being incel is more honorable than being a faggot cuck. In the ideal world, every man would get his very own looks-matched virgin female that has never done anything sexual with another man and he is bonded to her for life. This was the reality 500 years ago, 100 years ago, even 50 years ago, but today we are forced to accept this fucked up form of cuckoldry as natural. How can you live like this? Every time you kiss fuck or engage in any sexual acts with a woman, just remember another man has been there all over her before you, and that is what you are kissing or fucking, another man's remaining trace.

Elizabeth Minkel #sexist medium.com

Mary Sue
From self-inserts to imagines, how young women write themselves into the narrative
Illustration by the incredible Maia Kobabe

[This piece was written in conjunction with the most recent episode of the Fansplaining podcast. Follow us on Twitter or Tumblr, and if you’re interested in supporting our work—helping us commission more art and pieces like this—please consider donating to our Patreon.]

1.

Let’s start with the woman in question. She isn’t usually called Mary Sue—she has a less plausible, more fanciful name. Similarly, she has less plausible, more fanciful physical features than your average girl: purple eyes, or really extraordinary hair. You don’t know her, but you know the characters that surround her—she’s a new student at Hogwarts, an important ally you meet in Rivendell, the person on whom Holmes and Watson will rely to crack the case. She is notably smarter, stronger, and/or more beautiful than her peers. She’s going to save the day—and maybe a character you know will fall in love with her, too. She’s a wholly original character, though she might resemble an idealized version of the author. She’s a super-girl, bending beloved stories around her, heroism in a world mostly made up of heroes.

Oh, also: she is the ultimate object of scorn. She is the literal worst. She is embarrassing, self-indulgent trash; she ruins the story with her competence, her desirability, and the way all those characters you love seem to love her. She’s been described an endless number of colorful ways, including (via Fanlore’s meticulous and depressing entry on Mary Sues) the “literary equivalent of publicly soiling yourself.” She is everything that’s wrong with fanfiction, with girls writing stories, with fangirls, period.

The most basic definition of “Mary Sue” is an original female character in fanfiction—which is largely about established characters and worlds—who is often close to perfect. Like, too perfect. Very good at her job, very desirable romantically or sexually, and sometimes very emotionally moving when she dies, tragically, and the other characters mourn her. The story usually centers around her, often warping established characterization in the process. She’s self-indulgent, to be sure, but she’s harmless, and framed this way, one might wonder why young girls writing themselves into their favorite worlds is the literary equivalent of publicly soiling yourself. If you have to wonder that, though, you might not be familiar with the way the world treats young girls.

“Mary Sue” was coined by Paula Smith in 1970s Star Trek fandom, in a very short story that began, “‘Gee, golly gosh, gloriosky,’ thought Mary Sue as she stepped on the bridge of the Enterprise. ‘Here I am, the youngest lieutenant in the Fleet—only 15–1/2 years old.’” Lieutenant Mary Sue, object of affection of Kirk, Spock, and the rest of the men of Star Trek: TOS, was meant to be a parody of what Smith had observed in the fanzines of the day: “The term caught on because she’s very identifiable: Here it is, that same character, and isn’t it a shame because she’s just so tiresome,” she told an interviewer at Transformative Works and Cultures in 2011.

The conversation, conducted 40 years after Lieutenant Mary Sue first stepped onto the bridge, is an interesting one, not least because of the vague sense of disconnect between the literary analysis around the term (why bending a story around your original character might make for bad fiction, or at least not-terribly-enjoyable fiction if you aren’t the author) and the gendered morass that the term has sunk into (or, arguably, where it began).

Mary Sues weren’t born in Trek fandom—one researcher drew parallels between modern self-insert fic and stories that girls wrote about versions of themselves in the nineteenth century—but the term was born in an era of paper zines, a time of limited space for fanfiction, and arguably one with a different relationship between fic writers and their readers. When she first coined the term, Smith says, “In the letter columns, we started seeing the writers react: ‘What’s so wrong with my story? I’m just telling a story that I think is great.’” Even detractors admit Mary Sues are about young girls finding their power and agency in a world of fictional landscapes that rarely afford such journeys to women. After all, the original Mary Sue was the youngest lieutenant in the Fleet.

The days of limited space and resources in fic production are ancient history: there is always room for another story in the internet’s archives, and the general ethos of the broader fanfiction community has long been “don’t like, don’t read.” Many stories are self-indulgent, whether they feature a stand-in for the author or or not. But hatred of Mary Sues is embedded in the culture, self-perpetuating, and has seemingly ramped up since fic came online. In the early digital days, some archives banned Mary Sues outright; to this day, blogs exist solely to call peoples’ original characters Mary Sues, and to deconstruct and mock them accordingly.

Once the seed was planted in cultural discourse, Mary Sue accusations became impossible to stop—the toxicity surrounding the term has spread far beyond fanfiction self-inserts. Not long after it was coined, “Mary Sue” became any original female character in fanfiction; for decades, women have been reporting that they stopped writing original female characters, then female characters altogether, for fear of the “Mary Sue” label. Canonical female characters seen as threats to male/male romances in fic got the term, too—one notable (and incredibly troubling) example is the treatment of Nyota Uhura in fic about the rebooted Star Trek films. And over the years, the term has seeped across pop culture, to the point where “Mary Sue” becomes any female lead, anywhere. Bella Swan, Katniss Everdeen, and Rey from Star Wars are just a few slapped with the label. It’s just so annoying that their respective plots center around them, they must be Mary Sues.

(There are male Mary Sues, in case you’re wondering: “Marty Stu,” “Gary Stu,” and other variations have shown up over the years. People try to counter, even undercut, the inherent misogyny in the Mary Sue conversation by naming too-competent, too-desirable leading men—Captain Kirk, Luke Skywalker, and James Bond are famous examples. There’s an old joke: “What do you call a male Mary Sue?” The answer? “A protagonist.” It’s—not a particularly funny joke.)

But just as fanfiction writers are fighting back against historical scorn towards the practice at large, in recent years fans have been standing up for Mary Sues, too. Critics of the term are working to excise it from discussions around professional works, where it disproportionally targets women writing novels about female characters. In an act of reclamation, one of the most popular female-led geek sites on the internet took the term for its name. And within fan writing communities, people are going to bat for even the most self-indulgent Mary Sues, questioning why we shame young fans for making themselves the heroes of their own stories. But is a long-embedded stigma that easy to shake?

2.

It feels like every other fanfiction writer you talk to has a tale of their own early Mary Sues. Not everyone got called out for them—plenty of people learned to self-censor when they saw others getting shamed. My podcast partner, Flourish, reports that her early original female character was a student who proved vital to a case that Mulder and Scully were investigating. My first fanfic was almost entirely original characters, sketched out on yellow legal pads—I took a minor character from a book series and gave him a diverse team of corporate executives (don’t ask, it’s a weirdly long explanation). But by age 14, when I fell in love with Buffy and learned about online fandom, I was writing stories featuring a banshee who was old friends with Rupert Giles named—Ophelia. (I swear to God, I had no idea about the implications at the time, I just thought “Ophelia” sounded pretty, just as I loved “Cecilia” until Simon & Garfunkel ruined it for me.)

But these days more women are pushing back against the original characters they once felt ashamed of. After all, why shouldn’t young girls write the most spectacular versions of themselves—and why shouldn’t they want to see themselves in a story? In recent years I’ve been especially interested in watching women, people of color, and queer people reclaim the self-insertion narrative from one of indulgence to one of vital representation. In a piece partly about her youthful love of Lord of the Rings, Ash Davis writes,

“Be the change you wish to see,” Gandhi said (sorta). So I wrote my change. I discovered fanfiction and wrote all the damn change. I went into the painfully white fandoms of the things I loved—and wrote black folk into every last one of them. If there were no black people, I made them. If they were tokens, I made them stars. Mary-sued the shit out of everything. It didn’t matter, you were gonna see me!

In another piece I love about reclaiming the Mary Sue (via a medieval mystic, Margery Kempe, who essentially Mary Sued her way into the Bible in her writing, chilling with Mary and romancing Jesus), Ana Wilson writes about placing the female body back into reading—and into writing.

Reading The Book of Margery Kempe alongside fanfiction makes it clear that physical, imaginative reading is still associated with women, still considered embarrassing, and still employed as a form of resistance to mainstream narratives. People, in short, are still using this style of reading to elbow their way into texts from which they are restricted, just as Kempe and other women did with religious texts.

I wish I had my own Mary Sues to claim, but on a personal level, I’m a little more ambivalent. When I talk about good old Ophelia the Banshee, both “female” and an “original character” (and pulling from a very specific strand of symbolic mythology, for that matter), it’s easy to assume that I must have been writing a Mary Sue. But I can’t remember any specific connection between myself and the character, beyond the connections I have with every character I write, from the weary narrator of much of my original fiction who, like me, works at a racetrack, all the way to a certain pansexual immortal time traveling man from the 51st century.

The relationship between a writer and the characters she both reads and writes is a varied and complicated one. Fanfiction adds a layer onto that—the original characters in question aside, most of the people we write about started out as someone else’s characters, at least before the original work went out in the world. In the hands of fans, individually or collectively, a character often becomes someone else in the process. I should clarify: I don’t mean that fans are likely to render them out-of-character. But with the space and care that fanfiction can afford, fan writers often draw a favorite world’s characters as richer, more complicated—more human.

So unless you’re writing self-inserts or original characters, fanfic is partly about getting into the headspace of a character you didn’t create. That, for me anyway, is one of fanfiction’s chief pleasures—I’ve written before that for most fans, fic isn’t about wacky plots, as people outside fandom often assume, but about understanding a character so well that the interesting part comes when you stick them in a wacky plot (sure, “there’s only one hotel room left” counts as wacky), apply pressure, and see how they react.

For me, in my post-Ophelia Banshee days, inhabiting other characters as I write fanfiction has been vitally important. I read and write fic for a simultaneous distance and closeness with these characters—I allow them into my head, but I’m not looking to project myself back onto them. Part of this is privilege: whiteness, and I’m especially thinking of the un-interrogated whiteness of my adolescence, often lets white people assume a “default” position. A disproportionate number of the characters on our pages and screens are white, and from that lens shared whiteness with characters feels less like commonality and more like a lack of difference. Part of it is the opposite of privilege: the minefield of my struggles with gender and sexuality—almost definitely a subject for a totally separate essay—have left me perpetually out of step with many characters I encounter on pages and screens. When I think about myself in relation to a story, I slip away—a bit ironic, I suppose, for someone fascinated by girls who write themselves into stories. Or maybe that’s the whole point.

But part of it’s not just me: I hesitate to get too reductive on the links between shaming girls out of their own stories and the kinds of things that dominate many corners of the fanfiction world, but one could draw a line from the embarrassment of the Mary Sue to the positioning of certain types of characters in fandom as “default.” In the vast landscape of popular media, at least in the Anglo-American context, we’re implicitly taught to view the white male character as neutral, blank, infinitely relatable. While media certainly can shoulder some blame, fans should be held responsible, too, and the way young fans are encouraged, gently or mockingly, to step out of their own perspectives, away from their own backgrounds, and into the perspective of certain types of characters is one of the lasting legacies of the Mary Sue construction.

3.

When we consider the Mary Sue and her position in fandom at large, those of us outside the real person fic space often tend to overlook the fact that as long as celebrity fandom has existed, fannish communities have been built on self-insert fic with female protagonists. For many readers, this kind of story is sought after, not an object of scorn. The self-inserts that populate a lot of boy band RPF, for example, are perspective characters that, just like Mary Sues, allow young women to gain narrative control of their relationships with the objects of their affection.

Perspective is important in fanfic. It’s obviously also important in all other fiction, ever, but fic can sometimes feel particularly preoccupied with it. After all, perspective shift is one of the bedrocks of the practice; fans love nudging the spotlight off a canonical protagonist. RPF is an interesting space to examine perspective, and the way the “default” (white, male) gaze gets shattered and refashioned. There’s the complicated sort of circular gaze of stories from the celebrity’s point of view, where the reader watches the celebrity watching a character who’s often a stand-in for the reader. And while second-person fic feels more prevalent in fanfiction at large than it does in the published fiction world, it often feels ubiquitous in RPF spaces. Lumped under a second-person umbrella stories that work very differently in form and function, from fleshed-out second person narrators to “x Reader” stories that eschew identifying details to “imagines,” short prompts that exist in a murky space between fiction and daydream fodder.

When you place those fleshed-out narrators side-by-side with Mary Sues, it’s an interesting study in contrasts: where a Mary Sue is too-perfect, the self-insert narrator is often fairly ordinary, beaten down in some way, frustrated with her situation, not quite aware of her own attractiveness or agency. (Part of the pleasure of the narrative arc is the realization, and reclamation of that agency.) These characters and this type of fic is wildly popular on Wattpad, so much so that the platform commissioned an entire anthology of second-person RPF entitled IMAGINES, released last year with a shiny silver mirror on its cover alongside the words “Celebrity encounters starring YOU.”

The imagines of the anthology are, a little confusingly, not quite the same thing as “imagines,” the prompts that are increasingly popular on Tumblr and Wattpad. The anthology’s stories, about chance encounters with celebrities, are narrated by women of various ages and backgrounds with clear characterization and perspective. They’re not all romantic: in one story, a mother embarrasses her teenage daughter when she brings home Nicholas Hoult for dinner, the “you” full of maternal affection for the actor; in another, “you” are on the run with Kim Kardashian, a freedom fighter in an America where the government has outlawed selfies (Kim is on the run because she keeps taking them, obviously). The “yous” are unremarkable, but there’s a bit of knowing space between the reader and the narrator: we can tell you’re selling yourself short, and we’re waiting for you to realize it.

Actual imagines, in contrast, leave you to do most of the work of constructing a protagonist. They are short, sometimes a single sentence: “Imagine: You and Ed take a camping trip to get away from the media,” reads one on a popular Tumblr devoted to imagines, accompanied by a gif of Ed Sheeran looking sort of bashful. How you met, the state of your relationship, literally everything about “you” is up in the air—whether the reader even feels compelled to fill those gaps is a matter of preference. The “you” in an imagine isn’t necessarily average-looking or untalented—the same blog offers you a gif of Sebastian Stan looking charmed accompanied by, “Imagine: When Sebastian first meets you he is speechless and stunned by your beauty.” Imagines are interesting often not because of what they contain, but what they lack—the wide-open spaces they leave, utterly customizable, whether you spin a single-sentence prompt into a 60,000-word story or just imagine you and Ed Sheeran sitting in a tent. As a self-insert narrator, you are as present or as absent as you want.

The protagonists of “x Reader” stories are similarly blank: often called “y/n,” short for “your name,” these stories are the most literal expression of “self-insert” imaginable, since the pairing is you, the reader, and the celebrity of the title. These stories vary, but sometimes they tread so lightly in an attempt to leave “y/n” as neutral as possible that they wind up feeling a bit like Mad Libs, instructing you to fill in, say, your favorite book rather than just name one the narrator might like. Sometimes x Reader stories follow a full narrative arc; other times they feel like a collected set of imagines. When I got sucked in researching, I wound up in a story where in each chapter, you successively date, then marry, each of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

The prevalence and growing popularity of images and x Reader stories amongst younger fans is a fascinating shift when I think of the self-inserts of previous generations. If a Mary Sue is a projection, a young woman’s ideal self on the page, then an imagine is more likely to be a reflection: exactly who you are, at the center of the story. Mary Sues are aspirational, but in a way, so are these other self-insert forms: they construct worlds in which your fictional self, going about your incredibly ordinary life, is just as important as Lieutenant Mary Sue. The story still bends around you.

The overwhelming popularity of self-inserts on Wattpad, a fanfiction hub with a younger demographic than other archives, leaves me both curious and hopeful about young girls right now, writing themselves into stories. I know that reader x boy-band-star-of-the-moment isn’t exactly a new construction; while I was working on my weird diverse corporate team and Flourish was helping the FBI catch aliens, my contemporaries were writing themselves into Hanson’s green room and *NSYNC’s tour bus, stories they’d later disavow (and, haltingly, reclaim).

Today’s social media is restructuring our conceptions of personal identity—we increasingly center ourselves in our own narratives. Don’t worry, I’m not about to go on some “narcissistic millennial” rant. Quite the opposite: it’s heartening to see young women, young queer people, young people of color, center themselves in narratives when our screens and pages are still lacking. In the fanfiction world, just like in the rest of the world, we still hold marginalized characters, original or otherwise, to impossible standards. But perhaps our embrace of Mary Sues—even if they’re the most achingly perfect young woman to ever command a ship in the Fleet—will help change things for the better.

BasedRedPillZeus #sexist patriots.win

No amount of proselytizing or social conditioning will erase what God and evolution hard-coded into our collective biopsychological desires and behaviors

Women don’t want a man who will “do everything she says.” Why would that indicate anything more than insecurity and lack of confidence? Women want to be told “NO” and constantly test a man’s resolve to say this to her (a.k.a. shit testing) in order to affirm that she’s made the right choice (even in marriage) of a guy who will put his sexual impulses (knowing full well how powerful it is with men) on hold to stick to his own self interests, beliefs and ambitions. What this does is covertly communicates to the woman that his goals and determination Trump her one real power over him - her sexuality. THAT is the man who is the prize, the ‘great catch’, the make to be competed for with other women.

liberalneckbeard32 #sexist reddit.com

I'd respect women more if they were to just admit their shallowness

I think what pisses off a lot of incels is the bullshit excuses of why incels can't get dates and their patronizing attitude towards us. They hide behind the "personality" excuse in attempt to cover up their shallowness. Not to mention the countless douchebags and 'bad boys' who have no problem with women which completely contradicts that. They refuse to acknowledge problems that some men face, and instead mock us with hip buzzwords. Women are obsessed with virtue signaling and will deny to their last breath that they are shallow. It's biological, like a lioness who seeks out the alpha male lion. The difference is the lioness doesn't play pretend and is true to its nature.

As it's known, these days are the best for Chad but the worst for normies/below average men in the dating world. You can have social media to thank for that. Not to mention all the betabux white knights who are a big reason why western women have a huge entitlement complex these days. And yet, these feminists are still crying about being oppressed. They think they still have it bad because they're emotional beings who are open about their issues and always throwing parades for themselves. Men are raised to bottle up their feelings and to not complain about their issues, which is why women assume men have it easier. If these same women woke up in the body of an incel, they'd off themselves within a week. You take away love and attention that a girl is used to, they won't be able to handle it.

Kinda drifted off a bit in my rant there.

Lyn87 #sexist the-spearhead.com

I recently took a long trip for work and spent a lot of hours in the air. One of my fellow passengers really stood out in my mind: a 20-something lass a few rows ahead of me. She is a natural-born beauty in that “launch a thousand ships” kind of way – slim, near-perfect symmetrical features, piercing blue eyes, and a shapely body. She is, simply, stunning. But there’s more to this story than a retired soldier admiring an exquisite example of female flesh young enough to be my daughter.

It was actually her tattoo that first caught my attention.

She was wearing a low-slung top that revealed a HUGE eagle inked across her chest and extending down under the front of her shirt. And then I noticed her hair – what little there was of it. I’ve always kept my hair short, even by military standards, and her hair was shorter than mine. Few things de-feminize a woman more than buzzing off her hair, which is why it is considered to be shameful in many societies. She was wearing ratty, ripped jeans and far too much costume jewelry. And then I noticed the piercings. As I stood six inches behind her for several minutes waiting to de-plane I counted seven, and that was just what was visible. I wondered what else she had done to herself. A tramp-stamp is a given, but who knows what other “body art” was hidden out of my view[...]

I asked myself what would cause the stunningly-beautiful young woman on my flight – at the height of her Sexual Market Value – to do that to herself? Women dress for us, so what does she intend for us to infer? I’m easy? I’m rebellious? I can drink you under the table?

I can think of no message that her chosen facade would convey that would be in her long-term interest. In a few years after her looks fade she is likely to be just another tatted-up skank wondering where the good men are.

It didn’t have to be this way. In a different social environment a woman like her would have learned to be (gasp!) feminine. She would have observed the older women in her surroundings and absorbed benevolent patriarchy in the air she grew up breathing. With her beauty she could have married above her economic station and lived a comfortable life. We can’t know if she would have been happy, but she almost certainly would have had stability, security and comfort. But she doesn’t live in that society; she lives in a “Slut Walk” society, thanks to feminism. When she chose the “Suicide Girl” look nobody stopped her. Now she has mutilated herself with enough ink and metal trinkets to repel the kind of man most likely to give her the life she wants, because no matter what she does to the outside of her body, she will eventually want what women have always wanted on the inside – stability, security and comfort.

The fruits of feminism: what a waste.

Mike #sexist #psycho rantingsofanincel.wordpress.com

Revenge of the incel

I was inspired by http://thatincelblogger.wordpress.com/ on doxing women who reject him. I have an idea to take it one step further. I am spending this thanksgiving holiday wiring my bedroom with cameras triggered by a signal from my phone (Since I am an incel, I have nothing but time and money to do things like this). The next time I find a girl who wants to sleep with me(been about 2 years without paying), I will record the sex. Depending on how badly she rejects me, I will wait a year and post the video along with her name, number, and address on the internet. Since the one talent I do have with women, is to be forgot about by them, and since today’s cunt, if she is single, goes through dozens of guys a year, it can be almost guaranteed that when she finds it, she will not even remember who I was, or where I live.. That way, the whole world will be able to see that sweet little Lisa, is nothing but a dirty, nasty, fuck slut. Other incel’s will then have another free porn video, to, as the feminists would tell them, use their right hand.

Akhnai #sexist incels.is

[JFL] "Incels should not breed for the good of society"

"Incels should be glad that they are not getting sex! Now their inferior genes wont pass on to the next generation and our society will improve!"
-t .normie

"Normies should be glad when their wives cuck them for a chad.Now they can raise chad's offspring as their own and mold them into superior men that improve society"
-t incel


All these normies forcing eugenics on us are retards thinking that they have high value genes

Anon #sexist dalrock.wordpress.com

"The most responsible men of course are deterred from fatherhood by this new family model. This is increasingly true even for marriage minded men, as there is no legal way for a man to opt out of the child support model."

This is why women are obsolete. Every action they take is contrary to the health of a free and prosperous society. A woman is more at home in 10,000 BC than in the information age.