#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

Show post

TheModSquad #sexist deviantart.com

(Sequel to this rant.)

image

Why women will always be attention seeking self-absorbed twats

- Women are retarded when it comes to empathy. Empathy is your brain. not in your heart of your stomach as all women believe. Look around you. we live in a world of inanimate objects. If a man took an object away because it needs repairing (because repairing shit is what men do best). a women would be heart broken. "The poor item!" she would say. "He's being taken away from all his item friends!" Women feel sorry for anything and everything. None of it makes any sense and its not interesting at all.

- Women will do everything short of sewing a giant. red A for “Attention Whore” on the clothing of other women who get their breasts enhanced. but not one of them can stop fucking with her own eyebrows. How are eyebrow pluckings any different frcm boobjobs?
Protip: Their not hot as fuck. Of all the stupid time-wasting exercises women engage in for the sake of Cosmetique, eyebrow art is by far the stupidest time-wasting thing a women can do. She is better off making a sandwich for that guy she is fucking to get a free ride for the rest of her life with.

- Women love to argue. They love to argue because its one of the few things in life where fucking up at it gets you more. Of the many ways women to argue, this is my least favourite: "You just don't understand, because it happened to me. And this is how I feel about it!” If you want to see this dynamic in action. drop the “a” word around a group of women and see what happens. You can bet your ass that half of them will say it 'happened to them’. Somehow, letting a man pay for an abortion makes a women an expert on the subject. That’s like the time I opened a dental clinic after my parents paid for my cavity filling when I was 10 years old.

- Mothers day is the most retarded day of the year. since Mothers Day was invented by Hitler to encourage breeding among the Nazi nation. It was called Muttertag. Look it up. I dare you. Muttertag was first declared official In Germany in 1933. Guess what was happening in
Germany 1933? A bunch of Nazi shit was happening. Nazi shit like das Mutterkreuz, a medal given to women who had cranked out more than eight screaming babies. Water also gives you life. but you don’t take a day every year just to pay homage to water. do you? Where's National Air Day?

- A child raised by a women on her own is lik a nonalcoholic beer you distilled by accident: Good work, you made a beer, but you left out some key incredients like reason. personal responsibility, and the ability to not get yow ass kicked every day for saying all kinds of fruity things. Hitler was raised by a single mother. That proves single handedly that men are better then women at raising chNdren.

- Women love shopping for the same reason they love talking: It wastes their time. They don’t know shit about shopping. They have no plan of attach and no philosophy. That’s why whenever you go into a store with a women to buy a crappy present for her best friend’s wedding, you always end up in the purse section or the discount rack, even though it was set to get wineglasses for her beforehand. Men, we go in to buy our shit and leave right after. Everyone goes home happy. We don't spend half our day
playing dress up.

- I feel bad for women sometimes. They can't even get good at the thing they love to do the most: spending someone else's money.

- Men on he phone is like having sex with a women who won't get you a bowl of cereal afterward- Seriously. it's just a bowl of cereal. What he fuck? It’s not that hard to get. It's not like you harvested the wheat yourself.


Also where the fuck is that sandwich I asked for last time, woman?

Show post

TheModSquad #sexist deviantart.com

image
So you think you're superior?

- You have never been forced to die in war.

- You are not capable of performing the same tasks men do because you lack the ambition and devotion to do a good job at anything. This is why you get paid less.

- Remember when you weren't allowed to vote? It's because you lack the enough logical reasoning skills to take difficult decisions in a sound manner.

- You have never ruled the world. Because you lack the enough physical strength and intelligence to lead an army or a nation.

- The only reason you need wimpy support groups (i.e. Feminism) is because of your primal instinct of inferiority.

- You have never invented anything worth mentioning during the last thousands of years of recorded human history. That computer you're using, the electricity, the house you live in, the car you drive, the job you work for, the gasoline that fuels your car, the desk, the pencil, the paper and everything you use in your every day life was invented by men.

Mathematics, philosophy, science, medicine, and all of the important building blocks of modern society were created by men.

You are only to provide us men with your physical beauty. Which is the only wrorthy talent you posses besides bearing children. If you can't do that you're worthless.

Now go make me a sandwich.

(See here for the sequel.)

Show post

The Republic of El Salvador #fundie #sexist washingtonpost.com

A Salvadoran woman charged in the death of her stillborn baby was cleared Monday, a ruling advocates say is a notable triumph in a country with one of the world’s most severe abortion bans.

A judge’s decision to acquit 21-year-old Evelyn Hernández marks the culmination of a tragic saga that began when she was raped at the age of 18, her lawyers said. Those close to Hernández say she didn’t know she was nearly 34 weeks pregnant in 2016, when she walked into a latrine and delivered a stillborn child. Her mother found her, bleeding and unconscious, before rushing her to a hospital.

Paula Avila Guillen, director of Latin America Initiatives at the Women’s Equality Center, said a doctor concluded that Hernández’s condition was a result of an “incomplete abortion.” Police discovered her fetus in the latrine and charged Hernández with aggravated homicide. In 2017, she was handed a 30-year prison sentence.

“Mere suspicion of possible abortion immediately makes [women] guilty, presumption of innocence gets erased,” said Guillen, who worked closely with Hernández’s defense team. “When police were notified, they shackled her to a hospital bed and interrogated her.”

[Women serving decades-long prison terms for abortion in El Salvador hope change is coming]

Hernández spent 33 months in prison and was released in February after a successful appeal. In an attempt to retry Hernández on the same charges, prosecutors last week fought to increase her sentence to 40 years, arguing that she had lied about being raped and should have known she was pregnant.

The woman bled frequently and faced other obstetric ailments during her pregnancy, Guillen said, which she confused with her period.

The judge “simply couldn’t see enough evidence to be convinced she had done anything to commit any crimes,” Guillen said. “It was the right thing to do.”

Several Latin American countries have stringent abortion laws, including Argentina, where an 11-year-old rape victim was forced to give birth in February, even though the girl had repeatedly asked for an abortion. But no restriction is more severe than El Salvador’s absolute ban, which has been in place since the late 1990s and applies even if a mother’s life is in danger.

Guillen and other advocates say the ban is applied arbitrarily and specifically targets poor women in El Salvador who lack access to quality medical care. Even in instances of miscarriage, prosecutors in the country seek homicide or manslaughter charges on top of abortion-related counts.

Hernández’s case was remedied only after a painstaking process, and Guillen notes that this was just the second time a judge in the country has ruled that a stillbirth or miscarriage was not criminal. About 20 women remain imprisoned under similar circumstances, Guillen said.

But slowly, some of them have had their charges commuted or dismissed.

In December, Imelda Cortez was released after spending about 18 months in prison for attempted murder. She also gave birth to a baby in a latrine, but the infant survived, and prosecutors argued that she hid her pregnancy and was negligent. Cortez contended she was a rape victim and did not know she was pregnant.

Four months later, three Salvadoran women charged with aggravated homicide after suffering miscarriages had their sentences commuted. They’d spent a collective 29 years in prison.

“The stories are all so similar because they all follow a pattern of persecution of women who have stillbirths and are impoverished,” Guillien said. “You have to mobilize the world to save one woman; that’s what it takes in El Salvador."

Morena Herrera, an prominent advocate for women’s rights in the country, said in a statement that Hernández’s acquittal “is a sign of hope for all women who remain in jail for crimes they did not commit, for health problems that should have never been brought to court."

“It is a hope for Salvadoran society because we are beginning to take steps along the path of justice, of truth and of well-being for everyone,” Herrera added. “No woman should go through the ordeal that Evelyn did.”

Show post

some incels #sexist reddit.com

Re: Millionaire betabux cucked for 20+ years into raising his roastie's 3 boys. The revalation was made when he found out that he was infertile since birth due to a genetic condition.

(BenchoteMankoManko)

He raised them for over 20 years, to damn with genetics he's still their father. Why can't he do the adult thing and repair his relationship with the boys, why does he care so much about his genes, his name is being passed on anyway.

Can't he settle the matter quietly instead of dragging his children's names into the mud with him .

no, he's the guy that was tricked by a whore into babysitting and paying for all their shit

(KrakaLakak)

to damn with genetics he's still their father.

IT cucks in a nutshell.

(enjoy_life88)
just swallow the fact that you invested decades of your existence and resources in offspring that are not your own, bro.

(femcelslol)
Just be a literal cuck bro

(Idk12344482305)
That’s what you want, right? To never be held accountable. Well fuck you, he can do it, and he should do it. Thots like the whore these kids call mother need to be shamed publicly.

She should be held accountable for the deception... but he is just as descpicable wtf is he doing? Basically saying unless they came from my sperm, my "name" won't live on. Lmao what an arrogant prick what about all the other men who are infertile or gay couples who can't have their own children naturally

He raised them thinking they were his, but they’re not. They don’t contain his genetic material, so they’re not his kids. Every organism wants to spread their genes, that is the purpose of life. It’s selfish, yes. But so are all of us.

We aren't animals, we not to be more evolved.

Of course sweetheart, you’re special <3

(Salusa-Secundus)
Easy for the mother to say, maybe.

He got fucked over.

Bet the real dad is pissing himself laughing over all this.

Or sitting in fear wondering when his children/ex-lover are gonna knock on the door asking for money. Or if the scumbag is married wondering how this news may affect his family. Men need to learn to keep in their pants.

The men who can't keep it in their pants are also the ones getting laid.

It must be because they respect women and watch films with strong female protagonists.

Show post

evilterf69 #transphobia #sexist reddit.com

"You have no idea how it feels to be in the wrong body"

I usually hear this when seeing a gender defender debate about why feelings means he's actually a woman.

And are you fucking kidding me? No one on this earth knows what it means to be alienated from your own body more than "cis" women.

Growing up we're slowly and subtly taught that our body isn't ours. It belongs to that boy that likes you. It belongs to those grown men catcalling at you on the street. Your head is cut off and your body plastered on ads, movie posters, not fully human. We're parsed and cut up into separate cuts of meat all the time. Our legs are wrong, our breasts are wrong, our stomachs are wrong. Sometimes our body is so "wrong" we get implants or liposuction. Sometimes our bodies are so foreign we starve ourselves because we're never "skinny" enough. Have these people forgotten that the first people on earth to experience dysmorphia, which we call dysphoria today, were women who didn't see our bodies the way they actually were? Our bodies are literally treated like objects that are separate from the mind. The first time I felt like my body wasn't mine was when I was 12 wearing jeans and a t-shirt with a cartoon owl on it, walking down the side of the road with my friend and being honked at several times. That's when I know that there was something wrong, that I wasn't allowed to simply exist.

I and every fucking woman alive today have been made to feel alienated about our bodies. And not just externally. There have been so many times I wished I could either detach my female physical attributes or detach my female body as a whole.

Fuck you. You have no idea what it's like to be a woman. And when you say we don't know how it feels to be in the wrong body, you're proving me right.

Show post

RopeIsMyLove #sexist #psycho incels.co

Spousal """rape""" should be legal.

Marriage essentially is exchange-agreement. Husband provides material support for his wife, wife gives him access to his holes. In past it was most common way of getting access to foids hole for majority of men.
The fact that the husband doesn't even has exclusive access to his wife's holes makes marriage redundant enough, but what's cucked is that a husband needs to beg his wife for permission to said holes.

tl;dr; Concept of spousal rape is incoherent and illogical, because act of marriage is an act of consent.

Show post

Sans_Logique #sexist #psychoceramics #psycho reddit.com

(hydrolythe)
Inceldom is lame.

That's because it's built upon a sociological theory that can easily be proven false by basic psychology. (If all women wanted to sleep with chads, then why is hybristophilia a mental disorder?) At least Aristotle appealed to the essence of men and women when defending patriarchy. This is a notion many still uphold today.

If a man from Ancient Greece has a better theory than you for explaining things you have a resounding failure of a theory in your hands.

(https://www.reddit.com/r/incelconversations/comments/as3rch/inceldom_is_lame/)
Your post is extremely poorly thought out. I'd call you an idiot but it would be an insult to all the idiots.

That's because it's built upon a sociological theory that can easily be proven false by basic psychology. (If all women wanted to sleep with chads, then why is hybristophilia a mental disorder?)

Because the term/concept were developed at a time when feminism hasn't yet completely mutilated Western societies.
]At least Aristotle appealed to the essence of men and women when defending patriarchy. This is a notion many still uphold today. If a man from Ancient Greece has a better theory than you for explaining things you have a resounding failure of a theory in your hands.
What does any of this have to do with anything you state before ? Also, you almost certainly don't even know what specific theories fschmidt has and incels have vastly different theories on what causes their problem. You just lump it all together and you don't even explain what Aristotle was saying and why his ideas are better than... whose ideas exactly?

Fucking lunatic.

(hydrolythe)

Because the term/concept were developed at a time when feminism hasn't yet completely mutilated Western societies.
Ah yes, the "feminism mutilates". If you think that writing "women are equal to men" in the constitution is a form of mutilation you have explained what's wrong with you indeed.
What does any of this have to do with anything you state before ?
If a misogynist from more than 2000 years ago has a better theory for justifying misogyny than you do you know you have a massive failure of a theory on your hands.[quoe]You just lump it all together and you don't even explain what Aristotle was saying and why his ideas are better than... whose ideas exactly?Indeed. I've yet to see a theory incels have for their suffering other than the blackpill. The fact that you think incels are a diverse group of people when in actuality they force eachother into one rigid streamlined thought where any diversion has to be eliminated shows an incredible lack of awareness. And I don't care if liberals have another theory for their suffering. I care what they themselves actually think.

And in case you haven't noticed. Aristotle was much better (although still wrong) than incels ever will be.

(Sans_Logique)

If you think that writing "women are equal to men" in the constitution is a form of mutilation you have explained what's wrong with you indeed.
Anybody can write down whatever they want. I can write down that "men can fly and women have 7 breasts" and nothing will happen. But when I try to live by such nonsense is where problems happen in society. Men and women are not equal and trying to live by that lie kills a society pretty quickly.

I don't know what's "wrong" with me and I don't think it's up to you to tell me, given that you don't know anything about me or Aristotle or incels or whatever the fuck you ramble about,

You also did nothing to address my point, which is that hybristophilia was rare and thus a disorder before feminist plague wiped out any intelligence and morality. Today's Western women are very attracted to violent, immoral men and putting a bullet through a woman's brain will attract other women much more than any honesty, decency or morality. Raping and executing a woman is attractive to women in feminist societies much more than being intelligent or decent can ever be - being anything more than scum repels modern Western women

If a misogynist from more than 2000 years... something about theories
Aristotle wasn't a misogynist. Judging by your insanity anybody before 150 years ago or so would be a misogynist in this case. Nobody who lived before that time would even think of something as retarded as giving women the vote or believing that they were equal to men. His theory (which I am not familiar with and you don't bother to explain it) wasn't to "justify" anything but came out of his own pondering. You can't apply 2019 idiocy to a man who lived in 4th century BC.Indeed.Indeed what? Do you even know what you're replying to?
I've yet to see a theory incels have for their suffering other than the blackpill.
Umm, really? I don't know how you define the term "blackpill" at all but there are several explainations to why incel happens in a society that don't claim looks are a cause. Read

http://www.mikraite.org/Human-Evolution-td17.html

https://caamib.wordpress.com/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/

shows an incredible lack of awareness
Actually, you are the one with the incredible lack of awareness, equating the term that has existed since 1997 and that many people define and see differently with a stupid sub culture that appeared in 2016. If you actually read https://caamib.wordpress.com/2018/06/05/dissecting-the-disaster-how-the-term-incel-got-taken-over-by-the-worst-people-and-what-to-do-about-it/ you'd see that this all started when a bunch of morons from sites like Lookism and Sluthate overtook the term after Caamib was banned from Reddit. His way of running things was different and focused on rape, low ages of consent, Islam and positive thinking. You could have investigated and read about older incel forums, like Love-shy.com or the now defunct Incel Support to see what they're about. Instead you just blather like an idiot.
I care what they themselves actually think.
Yet you never bothered to research it at all and are showing breathtaking ignorance.

Your last sentence is also breathtakingly ignorant as we have already established that no one man can be better at anything than a very disparate group under a very disparate term.

Do I need to repeat myself? I'd call you an idiot but it would be an insult to all the idiots.

Show post

RegisterUserName #sexist incels.co

[OP of "[Discussion] SEAmaxxing is overrated, expensive, low quality and takes up a lot of time. What about other "extreme" measures to ascend?"]

Cold approaching is dead.
Online dating was stillborn.

It seems that, if you're white, the only way you can ascend is through going to Asia and fucking some noodlewhore who's desperate for a green card and you seem better than the average ricecel (not cool to cuck ricecels). But that isn't the case.

There are probably dozens of ideas that you've never thought of because, when you can't get what you want with mainstream methods, you have to think outside the box to solutions that have a greater chance of working. I'm talking joining a cult (more of an extreme religion where you can make up some mumbo jumbo that loosely correlates to what a crazy guy wrote to get some girl who also joined to marry you or face damnation, or whatever), entering a mental hospital, homeless people (not betabuxxing, but more of a "you're the first person to care for me; how could I repay you" and then they fall in love with you or something), mental hospitals, going to Alcoholics Anonymous or one of those circle meetings to find someone in a rough patch in life. Things like that is how there's ANY chance to ascend.

You can choose 3 options:

1. LDAR and be a virgin forever. There's nothing inherently wrong with this, and you can be happy if you have copes, but I desire something more out of life;

2. Half heatedly try to do things like "cold approach" and use Tinder, despite them being useless and you know it because you've seen the data yourself. It seems to be like a cope so that you can further reaffirm how over it is. You will not get laid on Tinder nor will you get anything more than a date (if you're fakecel and/or lucky), so why bother with that futile pursuit?

3. Do crazy shit. Step out of society and choose methods that might actually work, because we're not talking about massive sexual marketplaces; we're talking about unconventional shit that can't be quantified like online dating or approaches because they will be highly personal.

It's going to give you something to do and think about and, if you're lucky, you might actually ascend for real, not just a one night stand or whatever. You're probably thinking to yourself, "This seems like a massive scam to make me buy something because you haven't actually told me how to do it." And to that, I say "Eh?" Because I don't know yet either. So help me out.

These are some things I've thought of, just bullet pointed but I can go into detail if you want to talk about it. I'm not going to include SEA because it's already saturated with white guys who are better looking than you, and we want to be thinking properly outside the box, instead of trying to start a rap career with a name starting with "Lil" and expecting to be able to compete; we're going for that African clicking noise genre. Anyways, here are some ideas I can think of off the top of my head:

Alcoholics anonymous or similar meetings (25-40 preferable age range and the ladies will likely be like 20-35)

Cultmaxxing to make your own cult (requirements: must be Ritalincel; nah, but seriously, you have to be able to be very charismatic and preferably not a turbomanlet. Age range for incel would be 28+ I'd say and the girls could be anywhere from 16 (depending on age of consent; obviously don't break the law) to around 25 or so)

Cultmaxxing by leeching on someone else's cult and finding wife, but be careful that a fellow incel hasn't made it into a sex cult where he fucks your wife (doesn't really matter about age tbh, but this is a lot easier but obviously you don't have the power. Just be careful of the leader; he might be a day or something idk so maybe you could arrange not to report him if he made you archbishop or whatever lol)

Helping homeless girl (you gotta have your own house and stuff, preferably be able to fulfill a father like role because she probably had circumstances which led to her never having anyone to be a father) I think I like this one the most because she's not going to become a street whore or anything just to keep affording crack until she's raped and killed eventually; you're actually helping someone so it's the most morally acceptable and you are making a woman who's not a detriment on the system.

Uhhh I'm getting bored but DONT go after those "alternative" girls or whatever, because that's a normie thing and you will have competition. They are high SMV and likely already know that.

Mentalhospitalmaxxing and find some crazy bird

Fight girls' boyfriends and try to hit on them after. You see all those stories man you never know. (Works best if you're young, tall, good fighting success. You can snag teenage girls depending on laws in your area so from around 16-25 where they might just get turned on by it and are drunk and are angry at their boyfriends, but it probably won't be a long term thing ever because, I mean, come on, it's the type of girl to leave her boyfriend for an ugly subhuman because he got beat up)

Anyways, I want to know more ways like this because it might be the only way you can ascend.

Remember, don't do anything illegal because that's not cool! Well, it is, but it's going to maybe get you in prison where people might have ascension methods of their own involving your ass.

Show post

Kings Wiki #sexist en.kingswiki.com

The 1-to-10 scale is used to rate women's physical attractiveness. Tuthmosis states, "I use halves (.5s) to achieve a little more precision. The idea is that a girl who’s almost at that next level—but doesn’t quite have it takes to get the rating outright—will get a .5. I’ll also occasionally grant (or deduct) halves for “intangibles”—things like extraordinary sweetness (or bitchiness), a sexy vibe (or awkwardness), or a personal preference (though I’m quick to disclose the latter)."[1]

Tuthmosis has argued that the scale is pointless because "It seems we have to account for taste after all. . . . Guys rate their own catches high and others' low. Big-ballerism is rampant. . . . Most guys can't extrapolate. . . . Conversely, guys are easily fooled by camera tricks. . . . It's mental masturbation that breeds pointless arguments."[2] General Stalin notes, "Unfortunately, and I hate to say it, the 1-10 scale is difficult in practice. Generally men can agree whether or not a girl is attractive or not, but to get specifics on how attractive, as Tuth said, calls upon a lot of discretion. Using objective and universal characteristics like symmetry, physical fitness, hip-to-waist ratio, hygiene, etc. are decent points to go on, but everyone has a particular level of preference and ego that makes true objectivity impossible. Men have been referencing the 1-10 scale for an awful long time so I don't see it going anywhere and everyone has a general understanding of it. Dispute over specifics is where men just get into a pissing contest."[3]

MrXY writes, "A 7 is a girl I would describe as being 'pretty'. A 6 to me is 'cute' and an 8 is 'beautiful'".[4]

General Stalin writes:[5]

6/10 is average OK looks. Bangable and respectable but nothing to write home to mom about (not that you should be writing letters to your mom about your conquests)

7/10 is sort of perfect "girlfriend" territory. Where the girl is good looking enough to keep you interested in the long term, but not too good looking where she has a crazy ego or you get anxious about having to mate guard when you go out.

8/10 is where a girl is good looking enough to be able to start making money on her looks. Could be a stripper, bartender, IG hoe, fitness chick, etc. These girls are often crazy, especially where they live a fine line between normal and glamorous life style.

9/10 is a stunner. Model good looks. Gets tons of attention everywhere she goes because of her beauty. Can make a good living off of her looks alone. Most women at this level of physical beauty tend to shack up with wealthy/famous men because they can.

10/10 doesn't exists. No one is perfect. The idea of a "10" would be a girl that has something that a 9 has that makes her specifically more attractive per your personal tastes. Maybe you really fucking love gingers and this girl is a 9 who happens to have long red hair and freckles. There is your 10.

Hume's cheat sheet

L D. Hume notes that the appropriate level of investment in a girl?? depends on her rating:[6]

<table>

Rating Long term relationship Short term relationship Fuck buddy Booty call One night stand
1-4 No No No No Rarely
5 No No No No Sometimes
6 No No Sure I guess Yes Yes
7 No Yes Yes Yes Yes
8-10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Scale

0

Tuthmosis states, "No Such Thing. Has a dick."

1

Tuthmosis states, "Hideously Unattractive. A monster. Disfigured or irretrievably mutilated. Has two heads, is missing an eye, etc."

2

Tuthmosis states, "Very Unattractive. Disproportionate, morbidly obese."

3

Tuthmosis states, "Unattractive. Ugly, fat, and/or old."

4

Tuthmosis states, "Almost Bangable. But definitely doesn't pass the boner test. Still not good-looking." According to L.D. Hume, girls 4 and lower on the scale are suitable only for one night stands, and even then only when blackout drunk or when one has had sex with fewer than five girls in one's life and is trying to gain experience.

5

Tuthmosis states, "Merely Bangable. Barely passes the boner test. You’d be pretty embarrassed to be seen with her." Hume notes that having sex with such girls is "Almost always a result of excessive, yet not blackout amounts of alcohol. The 'last call at the club' slut coupled with a dry streak."

6

Tuthmosis states, "Almost Cute. She might be cute if one or two things were different, but they’re not. You may not be super-embarrassed to be seen with her, but you certainly wouldn't be proud, and you definitely wouldn't willingly bring her around to anything." Hume describes this as "actually the most dangerous category. The 6s are the most likely to finagle you into a relationship. The sheer number of 6s means you are bound to run into some that have a decent personality, or amazing blowjob skills. Your male hamster will start spinning, thinking about how her tight body overlooks the weird haircut and acne she has. Or how her cute face overrides her baby fat."

7

Tuthmosis states, "Solidly Cute. Zero embarrassment, even some nascent pride in being seen with her. You could bring her to things without looking bad, or losing any of the luster on your game." Hume notes that they are suited for short-term but not long-term relationships:

As to why they are not suited for a long term relationship, the reason is simple—there is just better out there in the world. There are 8s and above. So why, even though she is a cute girl and may have the personality traits to go along with it, settle for a 7? It’s a very very tough thing to advise against and even harder to put in practice. I’ve fallen into the trap myself several times.

The answer of course lies in something that most men have yet to experience. The feeling of dating an 8, which is exponentially better (though admittedly harder to pull off) than a 7. I’ve dabbled in this before and it does make a difference. Try to keep the 7s at bay for the short term relationships and everything below. Instead, use the time you would put LTR’ing a 7 into bettering yourself for the 8.

8

Tuthmosis states, "Hot-Cute. Would be straight-up proud to be seen with her or bring her to things. This is often the sweet spot for long-term relationship material."

9

Tuthmosis states, "Smoking Hot. This is a girl who can easily monetize her beauty. You’re going out of your way to be seen with her."

10

Tuthmosis states, "Perfection. A theoretical abstraction that only exists in the laboratory." Athlone McGinnis agrees.[7] According to Donovan Sharpe, tens don’t get hit on as often, are much more pleasant than you think, are extremely insecure, are so-so in bed, and are people too.[8]

Alternative Scales

philosophical_recovery notes, "The 1-10 as a rating scale will be debated until people stop using it. It's been pointed out before that a much better scale is something more like WNB->WB->WHR->WI, or, Would Not Bang -> Would Bang -> Would Hit Raw -> Would Impregnate".[9]

The late comedian Patrice O'Neal devised a thirty-point scale, with 0-10 being degrees of "ugly looking women", 11-20 being degrees of "alright looking women", and 21-30 being degrees of "beautiful women."[10]

Roosh mentioned both the 1-10 scale and the "binary scale" (with 0 being WNB and 1 being WB) in an early article.[11]

Show post

chadzgirl7677 #sexist archive.fo

Am I the asshole for seeing female friend even if my SO disagrees?
I have this female friend I used to spend a lot of time with, chilling or going out with no love/sex involved at all. When I met her I was single but not interested in a relation and she was with her BF (then they broke up, and I hooked her up with a good friend of mine and they're doing great). We were never really interested in each other romantically, it's just we had interests in common, which gave good conversations, good laughs and way too many spliffs smoked.
My SO never really liked her (even though I've known her before meeting my SO). My SO can get quite jealous. We've been together for a bit over 1.5 years and living together for the past 5 months.
Every time they would be both in the same setting, they would not talk to each other and they hate each other (SO thinks my female friend is a player and a bitch, my female friend because my SO is rude with her for no apparent reason other than jealousy)

I had all the usual "jealous GF" clichés: "She's more important to you than I am", "You know I don't want you to see her 1 vs 1", "You're doing it on purpose", etc.
She's been crying for 2 days, not talking to me, and all that because I'm having lunch with my female friend.
&#x200B;

Unpopular opinion here but, YTA. I guess it really all depends on how committed you are to your partner. If I was doing something that made my husband uncomfortable and he made me aware of it, I would stop doing it. He would do the same (has done the same) for me. Do you want to make her uncomfortable? I wouldn't want my SO to feel that way. Do you two hang out with your SO? If not, why is it so important for you to have one on one time with this friend? Your gf being excluded has got her imagination going and that's a hard thing for a woman to control once it's started going down the wrong path. Going out with your gf and friend might help her get over any insecurities she has... but if it doesn't, I guess it comes down to who you value more. We all make sacrifices for our loved ones. Honestly, it sucks sometimes, but if she were hanging out with some dude you'd probably feel a little uneasy about it, right? Try looking at it from her perspective. I don't think your gf is controlling, I think she is telling you how her actions make her feel and it doesn't sit well with you because it involves a good friend. Your gf is entitled to her feelings, sometimes women have gut feelings and they are spot on. Sometimes not, but why let her suffer the extra stress? She just doesn't want to lose you. And you may not be intending to be romantic with your friend, and your friend may not be intending to be romantic with you, but that doesn't mean it won't happen. Do you discuss your "controlling" and "jealous" girlfriend with your friend? If so, that's already crossing a line.
&#x200B;
Lots of people would love to have someone that cares about and loves them enough to be jealous.
&#x200B;
Commence down voting, I'm cool with that.


if my husband was uncomfortable with me leaving the house without him, I wouldn't.My mentality about relationships isn't unhealthy. Either you are committed to your partner or you aren't. It's really quite simple. I get everything I need from my partner and from my girl friends. The other men in my life are family.

Show post

BCPrepper #sexist #psycho i1.wp.com

All the unmarried women are going to be a serious drain on the system. Rather than using socialism to take care of them like the globalists are hoping for, and since no man wants to be a tradcuck for some CC rider --- I think a better solution is for men to "adopt" one of these leftover women, not as a wife, but as an incubator for a wife. Essentially she'll be impregnated by someone else, and any daughters will be raised to become the man's wives. In return all the women recelve shelter, security, and provisloning. Not this perverted materialist provisioning they receive today, which consists of handbags, shoes, McMansions etc. we're talking modest clothes, food. And they will have to pull their weight. This will essentlally be a post-collapse society.

Show post

Vermilioncore #sexist #psycho incels.co

[Serious] I wish woman had their pussies on their hands instead of between their legs

If women had their cunts on the palms of their hands, imagine how easy it would be to fuck them. When she reaches to give you a handshake, you can just take the hand and shove your dick in it. Also, if a female falls asleep you can easily fuck the pussy because it won't be concealed.

Show post

MaskedSnarker #sexist removeddit.com

YTA. I’m sorry... I don’t believe my husband would cheat on me but I’m not okay with him having 1 on 1 lunch dates either. I don’t do 1 on 1 lunch dates with guys. To me, this is disrespectful, she’s told you clearly she’s uncomfortable with this friend. And yes... you’re choosing said friend over her. Who has in the past been touchy in Gf’s eyes. Who you’ve shared a bed with. Who you are way too close to.

THAT would make me insecure. You’re supposed to put your SO first... perhaps I’m looking through the lenses of a marriage and you guys aren’t so serious. To be honest though, I’m a bit traditional. I don’t believe in close opposite sex friends. Group setting? Sure. But texting and hanging one and one and being besties? Nope nope nope. I don’t even invite that into my relationship. I’m his only close female friend, and he’s my only man.

We aren’t controlling. We respect each other and our relationship above anything else. We communicate. Your behavior and telling her she’s just gotta swallow that pill is doing nothing to help her insecurity, you’re VALIDATING it. Honestly you should’ve made an excuse to cancel the lunch date OR invited your GF along, or made it a group thing. You should’ve chosen your GF, so she could feel secure that she’s number one. Distance from your female friend and see her in group settings. Yeah it’s a sacrifice. But to me your SO should be worth it.

What should GF have done? It’s eating her up. She’s communicated with you. And you’ve dismissed it as crazy.

So what kind of man would you be if you distanced from female friend? The kind that puts your girl first, and does what he can to reassure her.

You’re more worried about Friend than GF.

If that’s toxic don’t ever get married. If you told me to swallow that pill and you’re going to lunch because I’m controlling and whatnot KNOWING I already had issue with this friend? I’d tell you to go fuck yourself. Sorry. Honest truth.

You two may not be compatible.

I’ll probably be downvoted, but I don’t care. I see where GF is coming from. I feel sorry for her.

Reddit is always on the side of omg she’s jealous oh so controlling!! No one should ever tell you what to do ever. Everybody can always be friends with anybody.

To me they call that too fast. She’s not cutting all your friends off or trying to. She’s uncomfortable with this ONE friend, for good reason. You need to communicate and take her feelings seriously.

ALSO- can we rewrite this real quick?

My BF has this female friend from before we were together. He always talks about her like she’s he’s best friend, so close they even shared a bed but he insists there’s no attraction and never has been. I tried to be okay with it but she was always getting touchy and in his personal space which made me uncomfortable. I brought this up to him and he distanced a little and kept to group meetings. Now she’s popped back up and invited him to lunch to catch up. Knowing how I feel about this, he accepted and now I’m feeling insecure, especially when he already knows my feelings in this. I told him I don’t want him to go, it’d make me feel like he’s choosing her over my feelings but he told me I better swallow the pill because he’s going. My emotions are spinning and I’m crying and he doesn’t care— he’s more worried about making a statement about how I can’t control him. I’m not trying to, it’s just this one girl really upsets me but I don’t know what to do because when I try to talk about it he just calls me jealous and controlling. But I can’t let this go.

AITA for being uncomfortable with this?

Show post

US Rep Steve King (R-Iowa) #fundie #sexist #wingnut desmoinesregister.com

U.S. Rep. Steve King told the Westside Conservative Club Wednesday that humanity might not exist if not for rape and incest throughout human history.

"What if we went back through all the family trees and just pulled out anyone who was a product of rape or incest? Would there be any population of the world left if we did that?" he said in Urbandale, Iowa. "Considering all the wars and all the rapes and pillages that happened throughout all these different nations, I know that I can't say that I was not a part of a product of that."

The Kiron Republican was discussing his defense of not allowing exceptions for rape and incest in the anti-abortion legislation he tried to pass in Congress. Republican leadership had prevented bills he sponsored on banning abortions from advancing through the House, despite GOP support for the measures, King said.

Just because a conception happened in bad circumstances doesn't mean the result isn't a person, King, who is Catholic, argued.

"It's not the baby's fault for the sin of the father, or of the mother," he said.

Show post

Incels.co/Incel Wiki #sexist #homophobia #conspiracy incels.wiki

One unique thing about incels.co is that it does not allow women to join or for non-heterosexuals to talk about LGBTQ topics according to Master.[2] The rationale for this is that women would disrupt discussion in orbiter seeking behaviour, and people would encourage incels to transition from male to female. Believe it or not, there exist feminists who join incel forums just to groom heterosexual incels to transition to female and date males so that they do not breed. Also, see R9k for more examples of such behaviour.

Show post

Various incels #sexist #psycho incels.co

(Napoleon de Geso [henceforth NdG])
How to keep pretty whores in check

Pretty whores must be forced into prostitutiuon, thats for sure. But how they must be kept, can be variations: keep them locked in whorehouse, or let them roam free after day of work. In case of keeping them locked is simplier, but in case of setting free, every whore must have her whore number tatooed on hand, and every man has right to ask her show her hand, and she must to do it. For that man later to find her at her work place and work time and use her flesh for sexual pleasure

And then just go, outsidemaxx, and if see pretty whore walking, ask to show her number, and so later can bang (state paying for it, if you incel)

(Vermillioncore [henceforth VC])
foids are rabid dogs that need to be put down

(NdG)
Ugly femorloids. Pretty can be used fod banging, just take away from them "right" to refuse, so every man could get sam fak with pretty cunt

(VC)
But what if someone is poor and can't afford to fuck her? I'm poor but I want to fuck a good looking one.

(NdG)
State paying for incels. Chads and normies working for you to bang pretty whore

(VC)
Okay that sounds like a good deal. I like it.

(Lux)
in an ideal future, pretty whores can be used in a functional way, disposal is a waste of resources

(happiless)
They would become diseased. To prevent that, foids must be private property or owned by regulated brothels.

Show post

universallyabhorred #sexist incels.co

Women Have Started To Look Like The Evil, Demonic and Otherworldy Creatures They are to me

I think there's a glitch in this matrix and only I am seeing it. Women have started to appear disgusting and frightening, even the beautiful ones that I seemed to be attracted to previously now seem repulsive to me. They seem so useless and worthless they fill me with contempt and anger. I cannot understand why these horrible creatures are allowed to roam free, why they are considered so pretty and lovely.

Even indicators of beauty now seem as artiificial as they are, I can see through the layers of fakeup, even the once appealing curvaceous form of a female now appears as a stunted weaker version of a man. Breasts look like unnaturally swollen balloons and ass, is boring and of course it's cunt looks like a predators mouth, disgusting and unappealing. While I still fap to females, I no longer gain any enjoyment from it, seems just like a quick release.

These creatures are so dumb, disgusting and evil looking, and have no redeeming qualities at all. Their eyes are soulless, empty and animalistic, their personalities are boring, annoying and simplistic, and even their one asset is overrated and hardly worth the effort. I wish they'd all just cease to exist, they are truly unworthy of life and should just be eliminated.

Show post

нσтησσв #sexist archive.li

I’m rather young, so i can’t really say if it’s been increasing or not, but i suspect so.

When i was 17, i was hugely obsessed with statistics, and i one day ran into a survey done asking female dog owners if they had ever had sexual intercourse with their dog. 1 in 10 stated that they had.
I haven’t been able to find it back as since then google’s search algorithms have been completely feminized so i can no longer find dick all on the net 🙁

So anywho, that got me thinking, about why so many girls had dogs as pets and not the cute fluffy cats 😛
Why they would always have a male dog, and never a female dog – wouldn’t you expect them to get a female dog?
I came to the conclusion that women were just extremely f~~~ed up and disgusting when it came to their sexual desires.

NOW! 5 years later!
I was on a movie set a few days ago, doing some gay ass artsy film lol… and the assistant director had a male dog… which she slept with.
This dog whined when ever he was away from her for more than 5 seconds!!!
So, it got me thinking, i mean, she sleeps with the dog every night, how on earth is she not f~~~ing it? I mean, who sleeps with their dog!
She actually literally cuddled with the dog… probably giving it more affection than any man she’s ever known… lol.

Just got me thinking, pretty entertaining thing to think of.

Since i was 17, i have noticed both a serious increase in feminism and female relations \w dogs… but i can’t really say if the two are linked or even if the latter has been increasing of if its just my increased awareness.

So… Thoughts?
Have you ever caught any women doing weird stuff with their dogs? LOL.

Fun topic eh? 😀

Show post

letsgobish29 #sexist #homophobia reddit.com

they're also still obviously attracted to men. lesbianism is just extreme degeneracy, when a girl has been alpha widowed and finds 'beta comfort' in her female friends instead of a beta male and they twist that need into a perversion, desperately trying to replace that lost chad intimacy with her new comfort provider. of course women cannot actually perform this role like a beta male can, so she ends up becoming even more mentally unsound and that's why all lesbian relationships are a fraudulent disaster.. they are trying to force something that is unnatural.

Show post

Russell James & Little Ice Age #sexist #racist stormfront.org

Re: US Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) justifies banning abortion by suggesting that world was populated by "rape or incest"

(Russell James)

Isn't this what feminists have been saying for years? How come they're never condemned in pubic for it?

They claim that men are naturally rapists and can't be changed. So, if men are "born that way" shouldn't we celebrate the diversity it brings?

(Little Ice Age )

The rape victim is the only one who should have a choice in this matter. She's the one who will have the lifetime reminder of what happened, not some lawmaker who will never have the personal experience of gestating a rape bastard.

Personally, I view rape pregnancies as abominations and wholeheartedly support ending them with abortions. Rapists should be imprisoned and neutered, or executed, to prevent the spread of their defective genes.

I agree. That's your business and nobody else's.
One the oldest tricks of invaders is to forcibly mix the blood of the populations they invade, so they can divide their loyalties. It always works: look at Obama. White mother but whom does he side with? The non-White side. They all do, without exception, all mixed-race people become enemies of the White race. Religitards are pushing the forced mongrelization of White societies because they, along with a lot of alleged WNs here, hate White women 100 times more than they love their race, their countries or White civilization in general. They're completely transparent but are too stupid to understand that.

Show post

Foxfire67 #sexist reddit.com

The solution to stop mass shootings...

image

[Transcript: A man who appears to be a high school principal is shouting into a microphone.

“ATTENTION!! All you high school whores teen thots and blowjob Barbies find the weirdest kid in your class and give him some ASS! USE THAT COOTER TO STOP A SHOOTER!”]

Show post

r/TheDogPill #sexist #psychoceramics reddit.com

The sole purpose of this subreddit is to understand and appreciate the spiritual meaning and biological reality of human relationship with animals. More specifically, within a female Homo S. sapiens and Canis l. familiaris (and other related Canids). It has been widely documented throughout the history (and since the antiquity) that a female Homo s. Sapiens and canids can develop a deep relationship with each other that shaped the human civilization.

(Translation: Incels have created a subreddit devoted to their sick fetish/alternative fact of women commonly having sex with dogs. Yes, really.
Warning: Contains graphic historical drawings of bestiality that are not flagged as NSFW and are thus displayed even if you are not logged in or have 18+ content disabled!)

Show post

saryvo #sexist #psycho reddit.com

I know this pain. There's no talking to her and getting her to change at this point, either. It's over.

"How can I take my dishes to the sink and put laundry in the washing machine when I'm so {depressed|stressed out|tired|blah fucking blah}?" And then she somehow steers the conversation into how actually you're a piece of shit and then she starts crying for some reason and then you end up being the one who has to apologize.

I'VE FUCKING BEEN THERE. IF YOU EVER ASCEND YOU MUST VET YOUR GIRLFRIEND CAREFULLY BEFORE MARRIAGE. "LOVE" IS NOT AND NEVER WILL BE ENOUGH. DON'T MAKE MY MISTAKE.

You talk to her with the back of your hand

The """domestic violence""" crusade is one of the worst things that has been done to men.

Show post

Holden (aka caamib) #sexist #psycho cwckiforums.com

[previous poster]"So if I'm hearing you right, if a woman tried to leave you, you would try to harm her so that she wouldn't. If she still managed to leave you after that you would try to make her suffer a fate worse than death?"

You're not hearing me right. I'd make sure she's destroyed the moment she tries to leave me. Before we'd even start dating I'd make her do a porn with a horse or a dog, I'd have all her credit card numbers, I'd know all about her tiniest details.

It sucks, but no other way to keep a modern woman. However, that's just another hypothetical scenario. They're not capable for relationships anyway.

Show post

Throwawayacct8890 #sexist reddit.com

[In reaction to some man's pictures showing a difference in his wife's expression at their wedding vs her meeting Rob Lowe]

why do men think this is funny?

Because men are raised to try to at least pretend to be secure with themselves to a fault, to the point of literal stupidity. Both men and women reward men who seem able to transcend insecurity.

Basically men think this type of shit is funny because we have to or else we’re being weak/insecure, and only women are allowed to be insecure. Men don’t care if women are insecure, we will still accept them and even sympathize because we see them as people. Women see men as status objects more than as human beings and can’t tolerate insecurity in men. As a result people hold men in contempt for expressing insecurity.

Show post

Adrian Sol #sexist dailystormer.name

Everyone knows and agrees that women are 100% to blame for all rapes – that’s a scientific fact. Only Jewish extremists and small-souled bugmen could disagree with something so reasonable.

Show post

Andrew Anglin #sexist dailystormer.name

[From "Respectable Egyptian Lawyer Says It’s a National Duty to Rape Women in Ripped Jeans"]

F U C K I N G B A S E D.

This guy knows what’s up.

RT

Egypt’s National Council for Women’s Rights (NCWR) is filing a report with the country’s prosecutor-general following televised remarks made by a controversial lawyer who said it was “a national duty” to rape women who wear ripped jeans.

“Girls must respect themselves so others respect them. Protecting morals is more important than protecting borders,” lawyer Nabih Al-Wahsh said during a panel discussion on TV. He doubled down on his comments, adding that it was “a national duty” to rape girls who wear ripped jeans, as he claimed they were inciting sexual harassment.

[...]

I could not have said it better myself.

Anti-rape advocates have long told me: “women do not deserve to be raped.”

And to that, I have but one answer: “yes, they do.”

And let me just tell you something here: the same anti-rape shills who claim that women do not deserve to be raped for dressing like whores will ALSO claim that women should be allowed to have sex with whoever they want. That is to say, they do not care about the virtue of women.

No – instead, they care about the opinions of women, solely, and believe that we should allow the choices of women to destroy our society.

Anti-rape is a codeword for anti-white.

Show post

Andrew Anglin #sexist dailystormer.name

[From "Iraq: Traitorous Beauty Slut Allies with Israeli Kikes Against the People!"]

Whenever you let sluts off the chain, they will immediately begin organizing to destroy you.

Like, this bitch was out of the bag for how long before she ran to the enemy kikes to start an alliance?

The Independent

The family of an Iraqi beauty queen has reportedly been forced to flee the country in the face of death threats after the young model posed for a selfie with her counterpart from Israel.

Sarah Idan, Miss Iraq, and Adar Gandelsman, Miss Israel, took the picture together at a beauty pageant in Las Vegas on November 14. “Peace and Love from Miss Iraq and Miss Israel,” she wrote.

The selfie was widely shared in Iraq and throughout the Arab world, where anti-Israel feelings run high.

[...]

And of course, the bitch doesn’t give any more of a shit how her alliance with the Jews affects her family than she cares about how it affects her nation.

She did it for purposes of being transgressive, to cause problems.

This is why Moslems were intelligent to keep their women in these bags. They try to be “progressive,” have a “beauty contest” with whores and BOOM – betrayal to Jews by women.

Every single time with these hoes.

nb4 “OH ANGLIN, YOU WANT US TO BE LIKE THE MOSLEMS AND TREAT WOMEN BADLY???”

No, friend.

I want us to be like our ancestors, all throughout history, and treat women in accordance with the natural order.

Clothed to elbows and ankles, hair covered.

[...]

Never in all of white history has it not been standard practice to keep women fully clothed, for the express purpose of keeping them under control.

The argument that to do that is “to be like Moslems” is the same as the modern “conservative” argument that being against homosexuality is to be like the Moslems.

You could also make the argument that since Moslems drink water, we should just drink vodka all day long.

It is not a real argument.

Females are naturally disruptors and betrayers, and they will do that any chance they get. The reason they create these problems is biological: they are calling out for the strongest men to come and put them in their place, because it is only under a strong male hand that they feel safe. As soon as they are made “independent,” they start begging for that to be taken away.

It’s the order of nature. I did not invent biology.

Show post

Andrew Anglin #sexist dailystormer.name

[From "Tajikistan Hunts Down Faggots and Registers Them in a Database"]

Never forget that modernity is not in-line with the natural order, and many people in many places still do not go along with it.

If you are not infested with Christ-killing kikes, the natural response to faggotry is to hunt it down and cut it out.

NBC News

Tajikistan’s Ministry of Internal Affairs recently announced it has compiled a list naming 367 suspected gay citizens to test them for sexually transmitted diseases, according to the official journal published by the Central Asian country’s Prosecutor-General’s Office.

The journal also said prosecutors and police identified the 319 men and 48 women through operations called “Purge” and “Morality” but did not describe the methods used or the purpose of the operations.

LITERALLY WARHAMMER.

[...]

Steve Swerdlow, a Turkistan-based Central Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch — an organization that investigates human rights violations to influence international policy — said human rights organizations were just learning about the new database and confirmed people on the list had to take blood tests.

Human Rights Watch is a kike group run by kike Kenneth Roth.

Their goal is to push faggots and drug addiction on the third world.

[...]

Although Tajikistan officially decriminalized homosexuality in 1998, Swerdlow said the country has “a severe human rights record” and “is deeply homophobic.” He added that the government’s latest actions are a continuation of its mistreatment of gay individuals.

Maybe that “fear” is associated with the fact that they are, according to any and all statistics, completely disease ridden.

Also according to statistics, they are orders of magnitude more likely to sexually abuse a child than a heterosexual.

Should we not “fear” disease and child rape?

[...]

Jessica Stern, executive director of Outright International — a group that works to improve the treatment of the international LGBTQ community — also believes the government is using HIV as an excuse to discriminate against the LGBTQ community.

Jessica Stern is a kike.

[...]

Yeah, I’m sure it’s not related to the fact that they get fucked in the ass by 50 guys a night.

It’s discrimination! The 50 dicks-in-the-ass a night are incidental!

Yes, that means that faggots in San Francisco are subject to “discrimination, violence, shame and stigma” – otherwise, why would they have these diseases???

Absolutely disgusting.

Leave Tajikistan alone, kikes. I’m sure if you want these faggots in Israel, the Tajikis will have no problem in sending them over to you.

Show post

Andrew Anglin #sexist dailystormer.name

[From "Malaysia: Lawmaker States Obvious Fact That a Wife Denying Husband Sex is Abuse"]

How is it that we’ve gotten to the point where we need jungle monkeys to explain to us obvious fact of human relationships?

And how is it that the world is so entirely kiked that such statements are controversial even in the jungle monkey kingdom?

RT

A Malaysian lawmaker is in hot water after saying that if a woman refuses sex to her husband, she is “emotionally and physiologically” abusing him, AFP reports. Activists and people on social media have called the comments “ridiculous” and “saddening.”

Che Mohamad Zulkifly Jusoh, a Muslim MP from the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) party, made the controversial comments on Tuesday during a debate on amendments to domestic violence laws.

[...]

All throughout history, women have been pampered like little babies by men.

They have had virtually zero responsibilities.

The one responsibility that they have had is providing sex to their men when they require it.

And somehow now, that is just too much for them.

Of course, it actually isn’t too much for them – all they have to do is lay there for ten minutes – not exactly a huge burden.

They pretend it is too much for them as a way to punish and control men.

LEGALIZE SPOUSAL “RAPE” – NOW!
BECAUSE IT ISN’T RAPE!

Show post

weev #sexist dailystormer.name

“I’m in a traditional marriage”
“I’m all for traditional gender roles”
“I want gender norms to be like the old days”

These are refrains I’ve heard endlessly repeated as the discussion over WHITE SHARIA has advanced. They are coming from women and a few weak men counter-signaling the WHITE SHARIA meme.

Because of the critical importance of this discussion for the survival of the white race and its European civilizations, I wanted to take a minute to explain to all the men and women claiming to be so-called traditionalists all the concepts and social boundaries that defined traditional relationships. This is the most important education that I can possibly give the community at this moment, and I ask that you ask yourself if you are really embracing traditionalism like you claim to be.
Coverture

Coverture was the reality for all of European history up until the mid and late 19th century, when feminist agitators, the media, and academic establishment triumphed with their agitations through its abolition. The basic principle of coverture is that the rights of the woman are completely subsumed into that of her husband’s. A married woman could not own property, sign legal documents or enter into a contract, obtain an education against her husband’s wishes, or keep a salary for herself.

William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume I:

" The very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband: under whose wing, protection, and cover, she performs every thing; and is therefore called in our law-French a feme-covert; is said to be covert-baron, or under the protection and influence of her husband, her baron, or lord; and her condition during her marriage is called her coverture."

UCLA gender studies professor Ellen Carol DuBois (whose career is chronicled in the Jewish Women’s Archive, of course) highlighted in her histories of women’s rights “the initial target of women’s rights protest was the legal doctrine of ‘coverture’“, and that 19th century feminist icon Lucy Stone despised the common law of marriage “because it ‘gives the “custody” of the wife’s person to her husband, so that he has a right to her even against herself.‘”

If a woman decided to leave her marriage she was a penniless non-entity no matter what her previous position was in life (truly, there is no better position for an errant whore to be rendered into). Any restoration of traditional gender roles starts by restoring coverture, thus removing financial incentives for worthless scheming whores to destroy the sanctity of marriage by abandoning it over whims and lusts. Marriage, up until the abolition of coverture, meant that the woman was permanent property of one man, allowed continued existence and any degree of freedom only in accordance with his desires.

Bride Price

" The dower grew out of the Germanic practice of bride price (Old English weotuma), which was given over to a bride’s family well in advance for arranging the marriage."

Before a woman was her husband’s property, she was her father’s. This is why the father gives away the bride at the marriage ceremony. Traditional marriage was a transfer of property, with the priest serving the role as the trusted third party to do the background research and make sure the transaction was honest. It was essentially like getting the sale of your apartment validated by a notary. The daughter was sold off by her father, and it was the father’s sole judgement of who was eligible to lawfully purchase his property.

The status of women as property was nearly universal in European cultures, with the exception of Jewry and some groups of gypsies, where access to tithes and trust followed a matrilineal line. This was why the Jews were so keen to attack these ideas, because the patrilineal passing of property was innately offensive to their culture. Europe only has this absurd notion of women as independent entities because of organized subversion by agents of Judaism.
Domestic Discipline and “Marital Rape”

Coverture and bride price were abolished to ridiculously assert women were independent entities with “rights” so that they could lobby for suffrage. The implementation of suffrage culminated in legal penalties for domestic discipline and the concept of marital rape so that women could abandon their most basic household duties, thus destroying their homes and their husbands’s lives. The thing about these changes is that they are really fresh and new. While the 19th century might seem like a long time ago for many of our young readers (it isn’t, on the civilizational timescale it is just last month and on the evolutionary timescale it is mere seconds) these new changes began in the lifetimes of our parents and finished in many of ours, and civilization was immediately and measurably the worse for wear.

Wikipedia:

" The reluctance to criminalize and prosecute marital rape has been attributed to traditional views of marriage, interpretations of religious doctrines, ideas about male and female sexuality, and to cultural expectations of subordination of a wife to her husband—views which continue to be common in many parts of the world. These views of marriage and sexuality started to be challenged in most Western countries from the 1960s and 70s especially by second-wave feminism, leading to an acknowledgment of the woman’s right to self-determination (i.e., control) of all matters relating to her body, and the withdrawal of the exemption or defense of marital rape. … The criminalization of marital rape in the United States started in the mid-1970s and by 1993 marital rape was a crime in all 50 states, under at least one section of the sexual offense codes."

Rape is a property crime and nothing more. First a crime against the property of the father, and then a crime against the property of the husband. This change only finished in the US and UK in the nineties, when I was 8 years old. Women existing in a state of slavery to the sexual whims of their husbands is not some barbarism of prehistory. This was universal common sense for whites up until a couple decades ago.

Likewise, hitting a woman out of her head was seen as benevolent and a universal necessity in every marriage until the sixties, and even portrayed positively in movies and film. Regular slapping and the occasional vicious beating of a woman was a necessity in every household. Women need to be regularly disciplined to keep their heads about them. They can be intellectually mature and clever to the point of deviousness, but they will always have the emotional state of a very young child and we all know what happens when you spare those the rod.

On this subject I hear two narratives from low-T men in the alt-right. The first is that all these transformations in the rights and status of women happened in reaction to family abandonment and general hardships upon women. Even those I respect like My Posting Career’s PLEASUREMAN fall for this sniveling lie from the mouths of manipulative whores. To these I have said: let us examine the data.

...

Broken families happened as a result of these changes in the status of women, not as the cause of them. The reality is that extramarital sex and birth was at an all time historical low because of Victorian standards of morality. The only spikes on that chart before 1950 were a result of world wars, because a man that died in some kike’s war could not marry his whore. Men held up their end of everything. They married women, they provided for them, they gave them newfound comforts and innovations like laundry machines that reduced their domestic workload to nil. They gave them full legal independence, and then they even stopped giving them the basic boundaries of discipline. What did women do with all these new rights and comforts? Well, you see how that graph goes. They whored like never before through the sixties and seventies, and Western civilization has been rotting ever since.

They did this because white men had a fool’s compassion in their hearts and lost the good sense to shove their faces into a countertop and give them a swift kick to the gut as hard as they can when these skanks had it coming to them.
Men Counter-Signaling WHITE SHARIA

So most of this “I’m totally traditionalist but WHITE SHARIA is terrible” nonsense is coming from women, but sometimes it is coming from small-souled bugmen as well. Some of these men are being bullied by their wives. Some of them just have no will to power. Beardson just used this line, and as far as I’m concerned he’s not only no longer the leader of the thot patrol, but no longer eligible to even be on it. We’ll be bullying whores without him from now on.

Here’s the reality of European tradition: women were a category of property that had a single instance of sale. They were complete slaves to the will of fathers then husbands, both having free reign to beat them and the latter having the lawful right to fuck them, where and when they pleased. This was the reality for thousands of years of European history and the change in this status only finished in our and our parent’s lifetimes. There’s nothing Islamic about this. It is just the default position of any civilization that is not being destroyed by decadence. Man up, put women under your heel, throw away their birth control and make them bear you children and take care of your house. If they resist, discipline them.

If you are uncomfortable with the WHITE SHARIA meme because it contains the word sharia, I can understand that, but “muh feels” is not an argument against the efficacy of the meme. This meme is effective because it has an immediate effect of being shocking and lurid to the senses of women and weak men and forces people to talk about the status of women in our civilization. All we are pushing for is a return to the status of women we had in the early 19th century before Jews and their feminism ruined our civilization. This should not be controversial. If you are opposing WHITE SHARIA because you disagree with women being reduced to the status of property to be beaten and fucked at the whims of her husband, you are a faggot and a cuckold and have no place in any right-wing site, and instead belong at the bottom of festering bogs like Reddit and Voat.
A final word to offended “traditional” female readers:

Despite all your assertions of being a good traditionalist, you fight against the implementation of traditional gender roles wherever they begin to be discussed. You’re not a traditional woman and you don’t want a traditional relationship. You just like the sound of the word traditional and the outfits you see women wearing in Victorian era photographs. You speak traditionalism with your Pinterest and Instagram posts, but your actions scream of your lascivious natures. You agitate only for the “rights” of modernity: to deny your fertility, to destroy families, to rot at and injure the lives of good men who have acted with honor and decency in all their dealings to you.

You’re a whore.

That would normally be a forgivable thing. I’ve found the company of many prostitutes quite amicable, and whatever gods may be know it is impossible to meet a woman that isn’t one in this era. However, that you would sully the good name of European tradition, that you would would run around using it as a cloak for your harlotry makes you the an entirely contemptible whore. Your blasphemy against the history of Europe is to a level unforgivable through words alone, and you need to have your face bashed in by the fists of good men before a great horned shrine. On the far precipice of life, as a palsied chill ascends fast to put cold grasp upon those streams that pulse beside your throat you may beg the apologies of your ancestors.

‘What am I that should so be saved from death?
‘What am I that another death come not
‘To choke my utterance sacrilegious here?’

Be honest about what you are. Don’t sit here and pretend you’re a nice traditional girl when you fight against any implementation of traditional values. Say aloud what you are, on the streets, to your families, on social media: “I’m a despicable whore.” Do it before it is too late, because I swear to whatever gods may be that when the purge comes if you have been using traditionalism as a cloak for your revolting degeneracy your name is going on a list and we will be coming to make you pay for it. You will feel the punch to your throat first, but the hours afterwards at the hands of a WHITE SHARIA gang will make that seem as just a brief and gentle touch against your skin. Your ribs will be broken. Your face will be broken. Some of you will not live to tell about it. This I promise: a much needed correction is coming for you soon, you disgusting skanks.

Show post

Andrew Anglin #sexist dailystormer.name

[From “Human Rights” Kikes Scream as Putin Decriminalizes Slapping Hoes, Bitches]

Just as it is axiomatic that Jews belong in the oven, so is it that women deserve to be slapped.

Women are at a physical disadvantage to men, so their evolved field-leveler is the ability to emotionally abuse men manipulating and berating him. When you remove the ability of a man to lay down the law in response to emotional abuse by women with the back of his hand, you create a situation where women have total dominance over men.

We have all seen women on rampages. What they want in that situation – what is required – is physical discipline. This is how healthy families work – women who won’t shut their mouths get their mouths shut for them.

The Jewish system has told us that it is “wrong” to hit a woman, but has never made any comment on the ways women jab and poke at men. It is a recipe for matriarchy, and I’m very happy to see Putin clearing out this bit of liberal nonsense.

Same week he banned a top porno website too, showing that Putin deeply cares about the mental and emotional health of Russian men.

CNN

Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law that decriminalizes some forms of domestic violence, according to state-run news agency Tass.

[...]

A member of the Russian Duma Vitaly Milonov, who supported the law, told CNN: I don’t think that we should violate the rights of family and sometimes a man and a woman, wife and husband, have a conflict.

[...]

“Frankly speaking what we call home violence is not home violence — it’s sort of a new picture of family relations created by liberal media.”

Bingo.

The (((liberal media))) at it again.

Sometimes you have conflict, sometimes you have to slap a bitch.

It’s not “abuse,” it’s just a fact of life.

Human Rights Watch had urged parliament to reject the law, calling it “dangerous and incompatible with Russia’s international human rights obligations.”

[...]

[Citation needed]
I would personally never actually harm a woman physically, and I don’t support it. However, simply slapping a woman is not harm, and it is usually necessary.

Who runs this “Human Rights Watch” anyway?

Oh, right.

Kenneth Roth.

He’s only concerned about the well-being of little goyim girlies, I’m sure.

If you believe that, I got a pair of tickets to Hamilton I wanna sell ya.

Show post

weev #sexist dailystormer.name

Over at Counter-Currents I saw a common assault against the values of WHITE SHARIA. Calling it “Whigger Sharia,” they allege it is an embrace of foreign ideals and barbarism:

" What is it that compels those who are otherwise pro-white to resort to fetishizing the culture of barbarous foreign peoples? … We generally try to end such barbarity wherever we go – even when doing so does not directly benefit us."

In response to the ridiculous utterance that we are promoting anything to do with foreign culture I already wrote an essay describing our values as the general attitude towards women that prevailed in Europe from pre-Christian Greece and Rome to the end of the neo-Classical period in the 19th century. We want to restore coverture and domestic discipline, and abolish birth control and marital rape laws.

With over 1700 Facebook likes and shares, it is the most well read and discussed document concerning the subject of all time. This point was then reiterated by Anglin in his essay “Revealing the Esoteric Nature of the White Sharia Meme” which is the second most well read and discussed document concerning the topic. Anyone claiming that we promote non-European culture is either woefully ignorant and we must question their intellect or is acting in utter dishonesty and we must question their motives.

Today, however, I am not here to lecture you about what traditional gender roles entail. I am here to give an urgently needed lesson in history, an education in which our critics suffer from a sore lack.

When one alleges that we are barbarous, a truthful answer to a single question may be uttered in refutation.

What kind of lives did actual barbarians live?

After we have answered this question, I believe that many of our readers and perhaps even our critics over at Counter Currents will be wonderfully enlightened.

The tribes the Greeks and Romans referred to as barbarians, Aristotle’s “belligerent nations,” had degrees of political equity for women unparalleled in white European society until the establishment of suffrage in the 20th century. Women used their political equity to garner vast political and economic influence, becoming loci for material wealth and common envoys to foreign civilizations.

Out of frustration with the cost of heterosexual relationships becoming excessively high and women bullying them with weird superstitions about faeries riding their accessory dogs, barbarian men frequently turned to homosexuality. The word barbarian was steeped in moral disgust. Most barbarians were weak faggots who could not control their women, and as a result were subjugated before the superior Roman physique and ingenuity.

Think I’m a liar with a sickening worldview corrupted by misogyny? Check the primary sources before you make your judgements.

Athenaeus: The Deipnosophists, Book 13:

" And the Celts, too, although they have the most beautiful women of all the barbarians, still make great favourites of boys; so that some of them often go to rest with two lovers on their beds of hide."

Didorus Siculus, Book V:

" Although their wives are comely, they have very little to do with them, but rage with lust, in outlandish fashion, for the embraces of males … And the most astonishing thing of all is that they feel no concern for their proper dignity, but prostitute to others without a qualm the flower of their bodies; nor do they consider this a disgraceful thing to do, but rather when anyone of them is thus approached and refuses the favour offered him, this they consider an act of dishonour."

Aristotle’s Politics II:

" Again, the freedom in regard to women is detrimental both in regard to the purpose of the constitution and in regard to the happiness of the state. For just as man and wife are part of a household, it is clear that the state also is divided nearly in half into its male and female population, so that in all constitutions in which the position of the women is badly regulated one half of the state must be deemed to have been neglected in framing the law. And this has taken place in the state under consideration, for the lawgiver wishing the whole city to be of strong character displays his intention clearly in relation to the men, but in the case of the women has entirely neglected the matter; for they live dissolutely in respect of every sort of dissoluteness, and luxuriously."

So wait, you’re telling me that the barbarians were hugely influenced by women politically? That all their women were living in the lap of luxury via the fruits of their harlotry? That all their men were catamites because their women were so manipulative and rotten, and thus were too weak to keep themselves from being trivially conquered by the Romans?

Wow, just wow. How progressive of the barbarians. They sound like perfect recipients of an Open Society Foundations grant. If those barbarians were here with us today most of their women would be into garbage like FEMEN and all the men would be passing through the Castro district of San Francisco.

The state of barbarians begs another question. How did the greatest and most culturally influential empire in all history manage its women in the same period?

" Roman women were expected to wear veils as a symbol of the husband’s authority over his wife; a married woman who omitted the veil was seen as withdrawing herself from marriage. In 166 BC, consul Sulpicius Gallus divorced his wife because she had left the house unveiled, thus allowing all to see, as he said, what only he should see."

LOL.

If average Romans were alive today they’d be being harassed out of their jobs for offensive statements about women, niggers and kikes. They’d be ruined in family courts and charged with domestic abuse. They’d be telling women dressed like whores, “You look like a fucking pig in heat, and if you get raped by a pack of niggers, it will be your fault.”

So now that we know what the lives of most barbarians were like, we have a firm intellectual basis for a dialectic of gender politics based in barbarism against civilization.

If you think the political equity of women is a good idea, you are obligated to then praise Jews. Jews brought us the political equity of women. They were there every step of the way, ending two thousand years of continuous European civilization to “liberate” women from coverture, physical discipline and the consequences of harlotry and let them make whatever choices they want. Jews were responsible for forcing the conditions of barbarians upon us. I must give the Jews credit for this accomplishment. The barbarians are here, they’re queer, and they’re well past our gates.

I, unlike our critics, stand against barbarism. I stand against the progression of time. I say we should punish these skanks like they damn well deserve, turn them into property and build an intergalactic empire even greater than the glories of Rome. Now that we have answered two important questions of knowledge, I would ask two more of you of loyalty.

Will you stand with the coming empire against the barbarian hordes?

Will you stand with WHITE SHARIA?

Math Does Not Work That Way Award

Show post

Sans #sexist incels.co

[Serious] Mathematic Proof That Women Are Evil

What’s up everyone, today I will be demonstrating how women are evil and proving it mathematically.

First, it is important to know that women thrive primarily off of time and money. More specifically, other people’s time and other people’s money.

From this we can conclude:

Women = Time x Money

Then, there are two common sayings, “time is money” and “money is the root of all evil. From these, we can respectively conclude:

Time = Money
Money = √Evil

Women = Time * Money
But time equals money, so:
Women = Money^2
And money equals the root of evil, so...
Women = (√Evil)^2

Women = Evil

(Submitter's note: FSTDT refuses to display the root symbol, instead rendering it as v)
(Update: Thanks to dxdydz for the fix! - Bastethotep)

Show post

GameDevCel #sexist incels.co

Skilled Whore is a meme

i see a lot of normies thinking some "expericiend" women would give more pleasure than an inexperient virgirn.

which is complete bullshit, a women don't need special training to open her mouth and contract her libs around a cock, or to spread he legs, and moan while she take a dick.

this experencied how myth was invented so roasties could feel better about their slutness and feel superior to virgirns foids.

i'm tired of normies that say "why would you want virgirn hur dur?" "she woun't know how to pleasure you hur dur"
stop pretending giving a blowjob is some science, it can be teached to a foid of how to do it in less than 10 mins, and her tight virgin pussy would give much more pleasure than a punched lasagna of a rosted beef that took a hundred cooks plus.

you won't find any serious research about vagina becoming loose with sexs, everything you will find at google will be mun science seguring to whores that "your vagina will be tight even if you have sexs with 50 guys and have a babie despise your age hurdur"

Show post

spambot #sexist incels.co

CyberBullying wimmin is liberating

I decided to indulge in some online harassment of some sluts who went to my high school. I contacted a few anonymously through social media and needless to say berated and slut shamed them to the utmost extreme. So much so that one of them threatened to contact the police and another sicked her big bad boyfriend and her sister on me through Instagram. It was quite funny actually. One of these girls had a picture leaked sophomore year of her sucking dick and I had a field day with that. The trick is to counter fake light-hearted responses like "have a nice day" with outright slander and threats until they eventually fold and go running to someone else to take care of their problem. But yeah I think I found a new hobby.

Show post

Pumkin #sexist incels.co

[RageFuel] My Chad cousin: "Being single sucks man"

Haven't talked to him in a while. He decided to message me as I was playing vidya as I always do. Kind of shocked me so I decided to talk to him. I shouldn't have done it. It was just him doing a 20 minute rant of how being single sucks with him literally saying, "Being single sucks man."

Mind you he is a Chad. Probably not Giga-tier but a Chad nonetheless. He has had sex with multiple women starting in his teens and has had multiple years' relationships with females off/on. He even mentioned in his rant how he had sex with "like 2 bitches" in the past couple of weeks but he doesn't "care" about them so it doesn't matter. It was just a fuck for his dick.

Near the end of the conversation he tries to throw me a bone and said stupid shit like, "But fuck women bro. We should hang out! Just guys"
As if he actually fucking cares. He just doesn't have a woman to pamper his every fucking need and sexual desire which is why he is down in the dumps right now. He wants to feel loved and special. He wants to feel like someone cares.

WELL GUESS WHAT!! I'VE GONE 30+ YEARS OF BEING SINGLE YOU MOTHERFUCKER AND IT WASN'T BY CHOICE!! GO FUCK YOURSELF ASSHOLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Show post

arabce1 & FIVETHREEBALDCEL #sexist incels.co

(arabce1)
[Story] Back in highschool. Storytime

Funny how all of a sudden I will remember things that I never wanted to remember. This story takes place on the outdoor basketball court during lunchtime. For all those unfamiliar, king of the hill is a chill pass time to play with your friends, it's simple, deathmatch 1v1's where the winner plays on. I wasn't lying about it being chill, however, bored foids mean that they're gonna come looking for chad. Unfortunately for me, the friends I played with were chads. Picture this, you're having fun knocking down shots from the outside when a bunch of roasties show up on the side of the court. You're playing against your chad friend in a non serious match when all of a sudden, the roasties start cheering for the chad.
Some background info on chad 1. he's an asshole, 2. he hates roasties and is known to call them sluts and berate them. So it's pretty obvious he's not well received. I on the other hand, rarely ever talk, i was indifferent to the roasties and assumed they were indifferent to me. So it came as a surprise to me when 90% of those noodle whores started cheering for him, given they should hate him and they shouldn't care about me.

Now that I think about this from a black pilled mindset, it's obvious, it doesn't matter how good you are, nice you are and how confident you are, foids will always secretely want the better looking guy to come out on top. It is a crime for an incel to beat chad at anything.
Of course I won that match in the first 5 seconds and the roasties all fucked off.

(FIVETHREEBALDCEL)
Back in highschool one of my chadlite friends kept asking me spar with him(i was known to fight well, in those times), i did spar with him and defeated him in 10 seconds, all the boys in my class cheered for me but i still remember seeing those foids face filled with disgust, at that time i thought i shouldn't have beaten infront of an audience(i didn't bully him, he challenged me to fight and lost, but afcourse to foids i was the bad guy) one of the foids went to complain against to the principal but the chadlite who fought me calmed her down and asked her not to complain.

Show post

spambot and Ted Bundy #sexist incels.co

Women are logically unequal to men

Women are lesser than men because they're subservient to men and therefore unequal. Like Ted Bundy said, "Beings that are for the most part subservient to males. Women are property, merchandise."

ANGER ISSUES AWARD

Show post

ordinaryotaku #sexist incels.co

[RageFuel] [GO ER] IT bitch implies that our standards are high and that we should shoot for fucking LANDWHALES.

I WORKED ON MY MYSELF TO LOSE WEIGHT FOR NEARLY FOUR FUCKING YEARS STRAIGHT AND THESE FUCKING STUPID SJW NIGGERS THINK I SHOULD SHOOT FOR AN OVERWEIGHT GIRL. I WOULD RATHER KILL MYSELF THAN SHOOT FOR SOMEONE WHICH REMINDS ME OF THE OLD ME WHICH I HATED SO MUCH. HER LIFESTYLE WILL ONLY TRANSFER TO ME ANYWAYS AND I WILL BECOME OVERWEIGHT AGAIN IF THAT HAPPENS. AND IF I EVER TELL THE BITCH TO LOSE WEIGHT AND SHE DOES, SHE WILL DUMP ME FOR CHAD.
image
I HATE WHEN PEOPLE SAY THIS. IT MAKES ME ANGRY. YOU DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH SHIT I WENT THROUGH JUST TO TRY TO LOOK ATTRACTIVE. BUT HELL I GET REJECTED BY MY LOOKSMATCH OR EVEN BELOW AND I AM SOCIALLY OSTRACIZED BY WOMEN EVERYWHERE I GO. WHY SHOULD I SHOOT FOR WAY LOWER THAN MY SMV IF I ALREADY KNOW THAT MY PHYSICAL PROWESS SURPASSES THEIRS BY LIGHT YEARS. IT'S NOT NARCISSISM YOU DIPSHITS, IT'S A MATTER OF FACT, AND ANY PERSON WITH A FUNCTIONING BRAIN WOULD AGREE. EITHER WAY, OVERWEIGHT GIRLS WOULDN'T WANT ME, THEY ALL STILL GET CHAD THROUGH DATING APPS. FUCK OFF AND GO CHOKE ON A FUCKING POINTED SPEAR.

Show post

Various incels #sexist incels.co

(Lonelycel)
[JFL] "Ex-incel" posts on inceltears: "I escaped inceldom by transitioning to a female"

Personally, I think this is a massive troll.

But JFL at the comments, they think it's real.

This is proof that IT are negative IQ

Read just the last 2 paragraphs if it's too long for you

(AlwaysLawRoute)
The fact that becoming a "female" gives you thousands of positive points to the eyes of society proves how highly overrated foids are,so many men don't want to be men anymore because the rules are rigged in favour of the """"opressed """"" gender.

(MarriedAndLookin4Fun)
Jesus I hope that's a troll. Trannies need to get killed by firing squads, hundreds of them at a time

(RegisterUserName)
Trannies are a black pill in themselves; you cannot be happy as a male, so become a female. It's just accepting that females have astronomically easier lives.
Fucking LARP either way...

(Mainländer)
That's exactly what (((they))) want you to do. Become a faggot or a crazy person who thinks he is the opposite sex of what he really is because of circumstances created by (((they))) themselves.

(Life Wasted)
Lol they dare not question a tranny, if you larp as a trap the left will bow to you like you are God.

Yeah but there's no way IT would ever acknowledge foids have it easier tho.

(Sans)
My opinion on this is like a double edged sword. I don’t think it’s normal and all but at the same time I’m a bit happy for an Incel who does that to get female privilege. However, this tranny became a cucktear so I have no sympathy.

(MSCW)
That's what they do with vulnerable people.
I hope for that man he is trolling.

(Dregster666)
This piece of shit didn't escape inceldom. It's worst than escortcelling or plastic surgery, this faggot completely overhauled his body of work for validation instead of embracing what he truly was.

Disgusting.

(Marquis de Sade)
Naw it doesnt. I dunno where u live. But here trannys face a life of being openly mocked, ridiculed and avoided. If some tranny walked into the pub an tried to hit on a guy. It would probably get the shit kicked out of it. They are an abomination, and no amount of postive press about them will make me thing otherwise.

(anon2719)
I know many trans people who were former incels in the speedrunning community so I can believe. I still think all trannies should be put to death though

(ovrload)
being a tranny is a cope because you know your pathetic genes are worthless as a male so they try and transition to becoming a female which never works out.

Show post

JailBait109 #sexist incels.co

[Serious] Does anything productive or original actually go on inside a woman’s brain?

I know that there are really “smart” women who work in fields with an education much higher than mine. I know there are foids who build, work with chemicals, and are rocket scientsis. But do they actually have their own original thoughts or do you think they get by from stealing co-worker ideas and pushing them forwards with the benefits they get from being a woman. Can they process their own thoughts or are they good at modifying ideas and faking it. Its hard to believe that they could have a sense of deeper meaning, bc if they did they would surely empathize wouldnt they? :confused:

Show post

Ap0calypse #sexist incels.co

The reality behind "Nice Guys"

When males grow up, society tells them that being a gentlemen and having a interesting personality will eventually earn you a relationship with a female who will be drawn to you because of said personality.

This strategy works, if you are good looking. Males who are good looking will enjoy female attention and believe that the strategy will work for everyone. Meanwhile a different results happens with an unattractive male.

The ugly male will think that he has to be patient. He believes that by using clever jokes, spending time with his female friend, and showing respect for her will cause the female to eventually build up an attraction for him.

Of course the ugly male wants sex. But what he really wants is a relationship based on mutual attraction, in which sex is simply one of many benefits.

However, the ugly male is shown a completely different response. The female is not interested in his advances and only sees him as a friend. The male is confused? Did society lie to me? Is this female different from the rest? Usually, the male will respectfully decline. However, he now notices that the female is no longer interested in the friendship anymore, as she grows distant. The friendship ends and they never speak again. Eventually the male finds a new girl to hang out with.

After many rejections, the ugly male will realize something. The strategy society told him to use is not working. He will look around him at his peers in school and see what they did. His handsome tall and sexually active peers display a behavior different from his. They aren't gentlemen, they are cocky and display a nonchalant behavior when with their female friends. Of course there may be some handsome peers who are respectful, but the ugly male notices they are the minority. He chooses to copy the cocky bad boy behavior of his better looking friends.

When he attempts this new behavior, he is met with disdain and humiliation. The female will reject him immediately, and will show anger towards him. He is then taunted by his peers for being unsuccessful with females. Behind his back, they will mock his appearance.

The ugly male grows isolated and sad. He looks everywhere for advice and help on how to get a relationship. However, everyone is telling him it's his fault. People on the internet say those females were sour grapes, yet whenever he tried again, the result is the same. No matter what method he uses, he always faces rejection.

After trying to work out, dress nice, and work on his personality further, he realizes nothing is working. He becomes desperate. But amid his failure, he becomes angry. Upon being rejected, he lashes out on the female with rage. He doesn't really mean what he says, but his hatred of himself drove him to vent out in a mindless rant. The female will accuse the ugly male of having a bad personality, and maybe will screenshot what he says and post it on Reddit.

This is how incels are made.

We weren't born this way, we just know how things really work in the world. Appearance is the only thing that matters. Anyone can have a good personality, humans are social animals.

But not everyone can have a nice jawline, a tall stature, and hunter eyes.

Also, marriages with an unattractive male and a female aren't relationships. They are merely transactions, the female is not sexually attracted to the male. She is only doing so out of security and financial stability. Chances are, she is also over 30 and can no longer sustain her old lifestyle of chasing good looking males who treat her like shit.

Show post

micropenis29 #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Teen Pregnancy Should Be Seen As Normal

In a healthy society, most foids ages 12-15 would be marrying and having babies. They would then continue having babies until they are 25 or so, and they would of course be full-time mothers and housekeepers.

Most men would be married with anywhere from 5 to 15 kids.

These would be the social norms, and anyone who broke them would be ostracized and rejected by mainstream society. The people most likely to fall into this category would be GigaChads, Chads, and the lowest-IQ foids since Chads prefer not to marry any foid, and the lowest-IQ foids are too dumb to realize that they need men to provide for them while they focus on child-rearing.

Note that this is the exact group that we want to stop being taken care of by society and to thus stop producing children, since this is the dumbest set of people.

Show post

happiless #sexist incels.co

Re: [Based] on an ideal world, foids would be euthanized after 18

wake up to slave girl sucking your dick
fuck her and then eat the breakfast prepared by her while she cleans your dick with her tongue
turn on your holographic TV
"breaking news: quantum drive technology has been tested successfully. Wonderful news for Liberation From Women's Day"
"Congrats master!" your slave girl says
fly to work in your car
press some buttons while the bots do all the work

alright that's enough for me this post is a joke :feelsbaton: I promise

Show post

Teutonic Knight #sexist incels.co

[Historypill] Why the Western white men have become such cucks

It's a bit long text but I can't put it any shorter.

The men that I have in mind: White heterosexual middle class and working class men from Western Europe and Northern America. Why have they become such cucks?

These men have had a very specific cultural and social history. They have been conditioned through centuries to obey their elite and to respect the hierarchy. First during the medieval and post-medieval feudal system. Then in the 19th century, these feudal states transformed into secular nations. The non-aristocratic men of all classes were technically given liberty but at the same time, they now had to follow a new religion of being loyal to the nation and its institutions, its symbols, its cultural and industrial elite. This was furthered by secularism which removed the power religion to a large extent and separated it from the state, so the state became THE religion.

These regular white men had to work hard in factory, support their families, go to wars for their nations and were expected to be blindly loyal to the Institutions of the State and its Law. A modern ideal of manliness was born out of this that among other things included the idea that you should accept all the hardships ("men don't cry", men aren't supposed to show emotions etc.) and that you should always blame yourself for your failures, because you live in this wonderful nation that provides you with everything. This is the mentality from which the incels are judged today (basically as a man, you should never complain, and if you have a problem, it's your own fault).

During the 19th century, these Western European nation-states became the dominant superpowers and controlled almost the entire world. The white Western men suddenly became an aristocracy of their own in the global perspective, fueled by the ideas of the white racial superiority, and they started to see themselves as such. The white race as a whole adopted the aristocratic mentality that they are the noble men who have to spread civilization all over the planet (the idea of the white man's burden). The white men now became the gentlemen, the white knights, the nobility of the world.

Meanwhile, the Western society started "liberating" all kinds of "vulnerable" groups from the supposed "oppression". After the WW2, this process was intensified and was systematically directed by the institutions of the Western states. The Western white men were expected not only to continue to respect their regime and its institutions and its new ideology, but also to stoically accept all the insults and provocations from all the feminists, gays, degenerate "artists" and other groups dedicated to shame the white men and their past. The white men were expected to bear all this and they did because they still saw themselves as some sort of gentlemen and aristocracy that is "above this". It's basically like the concept of noblesse oblige where the nobility is expected to be held to a different code of conduct than the rest of society and to be generous and benevolent, not lowering itself to the conduct of the plebeian lower classes. This is basically what you have in the society today, one code of conduct for the white men (you have to be liberal, respectful, humble, work hard, don't complain) and another for everyone else (you can complain, be loud, insult). White men were raised with this code of chivalry for a long time and have integrated these ideas about protecting the weak. They repressed their manly impulses which would mandate them to lash out and respond aggressively.

This is why the middle class and working class white men allowed all of this post-WWII feminism, LGBT, sexual liberation and other degeneracy to flourish. They believed that they still held a position of power and that they have a responsibility to serve the Western civilization (which became synonymous with liberalism, capitalism, feminism and 'freedom'). So they not only accepted all the degeneracy and all the insults, but even became proud of it and bragged to the entire world about what kind of freedom they have. They were doing it from a position of power, feeling as if it's their duty to protect the weak. This why you have all these manly men in Western armies bragging about fighting against the Muslims or other non-Westerners for "muh Western freedom" while their Western women are whoring themselves out at home. They're actually proud of this degeneracy. They see it as a sign of power and progress. Ever wondered why the American army doesn't have any equivalent to Muslim nasheeds? Because for the Western men, listening to some degenerate rap is their nasheed as it symbolizes the alleged power of Western liberation and global supremacy.

The thing is, all these vulnerable groups that the regular white men are supposed to protect and bow down to in fact aren't weak at all. They have been systematically protected by the increasingly more powerful State and its Institutions (that the white men are blindly loyal to) for decades. The West gives this groups like women, LGBT, immigrants etc. special privileges like the old feudal kings used to do in the past, so that in turn, they can expect their support and loyalty. This is basically what we have in the West right now, these "weak" "vulnerable" groups serve the system, they endorse it, they want stronger state, stronger institutions, stronger police repression (at the excuse of protect this vulnerable groups) etc. And the system gladly accepts their demands.

It's very interesting to note that the feminists never really opposed the white-knightism and chivalry of the patriarchical Western culture. They're perfectly fine with the middle class and working class white men thinking that they hold this alleged position of power where they have to help women. They don't want to convince them into true equality because if there was true equality, they wouldn't need these white knights, and the white knights would no longer help them. The feminists are just promoting a specific type of ideology that tries to strengthen the system and its ideological norms and which tries to humiliate the white men while at the same time giving them a false impression to these men that they're actually being noble and strong.

The white Western men are still too blind to see all of this. They still believe in the old conduct of chivalry, either in the form of being a left wing cuck, or a right wing cuck. They both very similar in mentality when it comes to protecting "muh freedom" (which in reality just means giving more power to the state which gives you this "freedom" and protects it). Both left and right wing cucks are blindly loyal to the West and see it as the peak of all human civilization and progress.

The attitude towards racism is very similar in the West too in terms of white-knightism. As a white male you're supposed to formally criticize every form of white racism, but this comes from a specific position of power as well. As a white male, you're also expected to be much more liberal than a non-white male. Non-whites can get away with certain anti-liberal ideas but the whites can't (eg. Muslims can be much more radical than the white Christians who get persecuted for the slightest offense). This is because as a white man, you're supposed to be a gentleman and protect the "weaker" races. This is literally what this so-called liberal "anti-racism" is all about. It's not about equality of the races, it's about white men being expected to be cucks and white knights for other races. So it's essentially racist in itself, although it doesn't really benefit the majority of the white race (and arguably it doesn't help the non-white races either).

Note, I'm talking about middle class and lower class white men here. There are whites who do perfectly fine in the West now, the rich oligarchic elite which holds the power, the politicians, judges etc. They hold a similar position to the aristocracy and clergy in the feudal systems, they're the ones who are actually above all of those things and laugh at the pathetic white peasants who work like idiots for this system while being humiliated and insulted by all the privileged "weak and vulnerable" groups at the same time.

What keeps the regular white men going? Four things: 1) century-long blind loyalty to the state, the church (the churches have unfortunately become too westernized and weakened to stand up to the anti-Christian secular states), the institutions, the legal system, the hierarchy etc. 2) an utopian belief that they can ascend to being the elite themselves. No matter how bad the situation is for them, they still have some weird hope that they can get a normal family, earn big money etc. This comes from the American capitalist mentality of pursuit of happiness, American dream (this mentality is now prevalent all over the West). 3) Relative economic prosperity which still enables all kinds of copes. The illusion of the mighty West that will continue to dominate the world through science and technology and solve everything. Addiction to the materialistic world and hedonism. 4) Fear of going against the Western idea of manliness where as a man, you're not supposed to cry and complain. This is further fueled by the secular humanism which promotes the idea that you are the master of your own destiny and if you have a personal problem, you have to find a solution yourself and solve it.

Incels are a problem for the regime because they have opted out of all this and don't share this mentality (other than maybe what I described under the number 3). This is also where this obsession with painting incels as "frustrated white men" (when there are in fact plenty of non-white incels) comes from. The regime fears that the white men will abandon it and stopped being the obeying little peasants. They want the white men to continue thinking that they're the gentlemen and noble white knights of this system because once the local Western white men stop being productive, it's pretty much the end for the West as we know it. That's why they want to shame the white men who turn incel.

The end of the West will come either way. This society has nothing more to offer (culturally, philosophically), it has clearly degenerated way beyond the point of no return. While not necessarily blackpilled, people are more and more cynical, they don't want to serve their nations as much as they used to (harder and harder to find people who want to serve in the army), this whole nihilism that the West promoted in regards to religion and traditionalism is now backfiring and is starting to question their own liberal ideology as well. Incels are simply a sign of things that are about to come as the men abandon the Western ideals of manliness.

Show post

EcuntR #sexist incels.co

[Venting] I hate females

I hope that when they die they are reincarnated as an ugly sub average male and they would still remember their past life of being a whore. And then when they try to ask out women they will reject them just like you did with all those kids who prob loved them far more than that asshole who just uses them to bust a nut. Then this will hurt brighter than a thousand suns.

Show post

Kakarot #sexist incels.co

[Serious] Foids past 30 shouldn't be allowed to breed

That can only lead to creating subhuman offspring. But it's happening more and more because foids are riding the Chad cock carousel when they're in their prime. Dumb whores. :feelsree:

Show post

Teutonic Knight #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Brutal historypill racepill. 10th century Arab writer admits Nordic Vikings mog his people to oblivion

10th century Arab traveler and write Ahmad ibn Fadlan encountered Rus Vikings and wrote about them in 922:

"I have seen the Rus as they came on their merchant journeys and encamped by the Volga. I have never seen more perfect physical specimens, tall as date palms, blonde and ruddy; they wear neither tunics nor caftans, but the men wear a garment which covers one side of the body and leaves a hand free."

Other sources also mention the Vikings as having been tall, for instance in the East Frankish chronicles called Annals of Fulda. It mentions the appearance of the Vikings at a battle in 884, were the Franks defeated a Viking raid in Saxony.

"In that battle, such men are said to have been killed among the Northmen as had never been seen before among the Frankish people, namely in their beauty and the size of their bodies."

JFL at people who think Germanic whites only got tall recently due to nutrition. They heighmogged people back then just like they do now.

It never began for arabcels. Even at the peek of the Muslim Arab golden age they were brutally mogged.

Take the historypill

Next page