Top posts since
last month

#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

epicenterdefacto #sexist #psycho waivio.com

Young Man Is Wrongfully Punished For Experiencing His First Love

1. Juvenile-Related Sex Laws Without Any Sense Of True Justice

As I was browsing around on YouTube last night, I came across this one video of a sentencing hearing involving a young man who had sexual intercourse with his girlfriend four different times. Did he forcibly rape her? No. Did he coerce her into having sex? No. Did he sexually molest her? No. Did he even groom her? No. His girlfriend was his first love.

Nonetheless, none of those facts made any difference to the judge. This young man had already pleaded guilty to a sexual offense, and the only thing that she was interested in was the fact that he was 23 years of age and his girlfriend was only 12 years old. Now, I know what many of you are going to say, but watch the video first and then form your own opinions about this matter.

The name of the 23-year-old defendant is Hector Enrique Laura Sanchez. He is an immigrant from Honduras. You may think that a 23-year-old man is way too old to be intermingling with a 12-year-old girl. However, back when the late Loni Anderson, an actress, was 12 years old, she dated a 22-year-old man. Her parents allowed the courtship. Of course, the late Ms. Anderson was a full-figured woman by then.

The criminal defense attorney even stressed that the 12-year-old girl that Mr. Sanchez had sexual relations with was physically precocious for her years and had an enriched sexual vocabulary. He also pointed out to Judge Stephanie Boyd that the girl told the police that she had been the one to seduce Mr. Sanchez rather than the other way around. The girl's mother didn't want him to go to jail or prison.

Some of you may argue that this girl was just a child. According to medical science, she wasn't. There is a world of a difference between a 12-year-old girl who is an adolescent and a prepubescent child who may be only 5 or 6 years of age.

Jlibourel #sexist #psycho styleforum.net

I look forward to you two finding out about “;no means no”; in, oh, 20 years.

^Guys who take this "no means no" business too seriously get laid a lot less often than those who don't!

A certain amount of coy resistance is inherent in female sexuality, I think--and I don't just mean human females.

A harsh, firm "NO!", and, yeah, I'd probably back off

[Emphasis added]

Ben Shapiro #ableist #conspiracy #crackpot #pratt #psycho #racist #sexist #transphobia #wingnut thebulwark.com

The Daily Wire Is Quietly Shooting a Pro-ICE Movie. We Got the Script.

The film, with the working title Pawn Shop, centers on an Antifa siege of a Minneapolis pawn shop amid anti-ICE unrest. On one side: an ICE agent joined by a group of pawn-shop employees and customers. On the other: a rabble of progressive protesters, and eventually a bloodthirsty MS-13 death squad, both intent on rescuing a Hispanic man detained by ICE. It plays out exactly how you’d expect it would.

The film’s first minutes will likely get the most attention. As Pawn Shop opens, two ICE agents in Minneapolis arrest the Latino man, later revealed to be an MS-13 boss. Dimwitted liberal activists film and scuffle with the agents as they try to take their suspect away.

Then the film’s Renée Good stand-in enters, slamming her Subaru into the ICE van. Described with the subtlety of a brick as “MELANIE (40), a fat blue-hair,” the woman, blasting NPR, revs up again and fatally hits ICE agent “Juan” with her car. Then his ICE partner, “Mike,” shoots her in a justifiable killing.

Melanie reacts to the drawn gun with panic...

She MASHES on the gas as she throws the car into reverse, accidentally SLAMMING Juan out of the way. He goes flying into the gutter, bleeding...

And as the car reverses, Mike FIRES TWICE through the

windshield...

The first shot takes the [sic] Melanie in the neck, below her covid

mask. The second in the head, above her covid mask.

Blood SPLATTERS on her PASSENGER’s (40s, female, overweight)

forehead and matching covid mask.

From there, the ICE agent drags his suspect into the pawn shop, with an Antifa mob hot on their heels. The stage is now set for a siege, during which numerous Molotov cocktails will be thrown and shotgun shells will fly. Rest assured that no liberal piety will survive.

Inside the pawn shop, we meet its grizzled Hispanic owner and his son, newly back from college and majoring in Chicano studies. Much to his father’s chagrin, the son is dressed in a Che Guevara shirt and “listening to a POP SONG unfitting for a man.” A pawn-shop security guard quips they’re lucky the boy didn’t get a sex change.

Brandon Herrera #ableist #elitist #psycho #wingnut #sexist #racist meidasnews.com

Republican congressional candidate Brandon Herrera implied COVID-19 “wasn’t bad enough” because not enough obese people died. The remarks were made during Herrera’s appearance on Elijah Schaffer’s Slightly Offensive on July 31, 2022, approximately a year before his first congressional run.

The conversation began with the participants discussing diversity on romance and dating shows and whether contestants’ racial preferences affected which people were eliminated before turning toward obesity. After the host said white men prefer to date white women over Black women, Herrera said, “I wonder if they’re solving for all variables here. Because there’s also like an obesity epidemic in the female Black community. So it’s like, okay, well, maybe …did you show them like a 100 random Black women and they just maybe don’t like obese people?”

After another participant, TimCast producer Lisa Jackson, then explained she hates obese people alleging she was being bullied by them when she was younger because she was skinny. Herrera then joked that perhaps they “hated you because there wasn’t enough of you to eat.”

Jackson then repeated that she hated “fat people” and “especially fat women” and called them “the most undisciplined, freaking disgusting people ever,” telling them to “stop putting food in your mouth.” Herrera appeared amused during the unhinged rant.

Host Elijah Shaffer then said, “Brandon’s like, shit, this is not helping my life.” However, Herrera then affirmed the sentiment: “No, no, I’m here for it, dude. I’m of the opinion COVID wasn’t bad enough because if you had something that just unfairly targeted fucking fat people, I’m here for it,” Herrera said. He then added, “I would have worn my mask nowhere on purpose.”

Herrera is the Republican candidate in Texas’ 23rd Congressional District, where he is running against Democratic nominee Katy Padilla Stout.

Anon #sexist #psycho crystal.cafe

Why I will never care about cases of moids or scrotelings getting "molested" or "abused" hurt them worse. Free Polina Dvorkina Free Lindsay. 3 year olds rape adult women more often than the reverse

Anon #sexist #psycho lolcow.farm

I want to release a bunch of genetically engineered, drugged up, aggressive strictly gay males on the street to rape and pillage every moid. They will be programmed to leave us alone though, obviously. After all the men have been thoroughly raped we will kill them all

xaelai #sexist #psycho mmo-champion.com

Woman wears clothing that invites men to look at her in a sexual way.
Woman struts her stuff to show off her body in an area that's not so safe.
Woman gets raped.
Sure, the guy is definitely at fault, but sometimes it takes two to make something happen. Maybe if women would dress a bit more conservatively, maybe if women wouldn't be showing off their body so much, maybe if women would watch what they're doing at parties and such, we'd see a lot less rapes.

Do you walk down the streets of the ghettos at night wearing an armani suit, and carrying a briefcase full of cash? Of course not. That'd be inviting a mugger to rob you blind.

…
Doesn't matter if it is a robbery, rape, murder, there's the person who commits the crime... and then there's the person who the crime is committed against.
If the latter invites the former by being an easy target, or an attractive target, then the latter is partially contributing to the crime.

Everybody has a responsibility to act maturely and in such a way that they are protecting themselves from such crime. Sometimes crime happens anyways even if you do take all the precautionary measures, but if you do something absolutely stupid and you become the victim of a crime... then yes, you're partially to blame for it.
Everybody is responsible for their own personal safety. This includes women and skimpy clothing. There's no reason to wear skimpy clothing other than to get men to lust after them. Is it really THAT big of a surprise when a woman who was wearing that trashy clothing gets raped? Now, obviously, if a woman was not wearing trashy clothing and still got raped... then no, she's not at fault (unless she did something else stupid, like drinking at a party or something) at all.
…
If you're a woman wanting to avoid being raped, then yes... you should not be wearing skimpy clothing and perhaps you should be avoiding parties and drinking. Perhaps if the woman in question weren't wearing trashy clothing, men might have a little more respect for her, eh?

JonFreeman #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger deviantart.com

got an assignment for all y'all

start using the phrase "feminist power fantasy", and when asked simply state "it's the fantasy that feminists have where they're smart, liked by everyone, and are able to put down all of their detractors with witty words ... things which aren't true and they wish were the case."

doing so will trigger the shit out of feminists and, therefore, cause it to meme hard.

Eivind Berge's Blog #sexist #psycho eivindberge.blogspot.com

. A young woman from Norway, 24-year-old Marte Deborah Dalelv, naively thought she could do the same in Dubai, but was shocked to learn that what passes for "rape" in Norway is criminal conduct for women in Dubai. The courts in Dubai didn't agree that her story constitutes rape, and sentenced her instead to 16 months in prison for fornication and drinking alcohol.

….
One side of a story is almost never accurate, and here we only have the woman's story quoted. Even so, Marte's story does not add up to rape even if she is telling nothing but the truth. She describes only token resistance in going to the man's hotel room before willingly going to bed with him, and then blacks out and implies no resistance at all until she has her regrets the next morning as she wakes up naked. There is no violence; only drunkenness and regret. The case could hardly be more stereotypical of regretted drunken sex redefined in retrospect as rape thanks to feminist rape law -- minus the feminist law. The accused rapist is just a normal, persistent man, behaving like I have done many times and any of us would. Only with perverse, misandristic laws can this be rape, and I am pleased that Dubai rejects the hateful precepts of feminist rape law that Marte thought she could get away with.
…
Marte Deborah Dalelv was at worst taken advantage of while drunk and careless, like any normal man would do, but she was not raped. I am happy that she is now experiencing a backlash for her hateful attitude that she is entitled to have men imprisoned for our normal male sexuality.

rowaasr13 #sexist #psycho mmo-champion.com

Alright so let's put this into terms you can understand.
A guy could walk into the party, take a date rape pill himself, lay down buck-naked and spread-eagle on a bed before he passes out and still be completely 0% at fault.
Better? Because both are true, it doesn't mean they weren't stupid actions, but when someone is raped it is due to the aggressive actions of another person NOT their own. Doesn't matter the gender, or the situation.
Na-ah. Millions of people have aggressive sex every day. It is our biology. It is just some stupid attention whore cunts learned how to gain notoriety in some modern societies while doing so.

So, in your opinion, what is required for something not to be treated "rape"? Signed waiver?
Should next time I come home late and see my wife sleeping in some sexy wear be afraid of touching her because she clearly didn't gave me any consent yet?

That is a FANTASY, and it is NOT rape by any means. Men have the fantasy too.

The only difference between "fantasy" and "rape" is whatever she liked her fucker or not. And that's royally fucked up part.

Originally Posted by Crissi
"Consent need not be expressed, and may be implied from the context and from the relationship of the parties, but the absence of objection does not of itself constitute consent." Wikipedia

[Url=https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/1276650-CNN-grieves-that-guilty-verdict-ruined-%E2%80%98promising%E2%80%99-lives-of-Steubenville-rapists?p=20548464&viewfull=1#post20548464]Being at underage party with alcohol drinks is a "there's very likely there will be sex" situation in my book. Going there instead of staying away is pretty much implied consent. And please, don't spout nonsense "she couldn't know that!" Pretty much every girl know that at about 13 yo nowadays if not sooner.

CADdie,Squishyfish,Chickenlegs #sexist #psycho arstechnica.com

CADdie: “I lost my virginity at age 18 to a 14 year old girl who was more mature and experienced than me, and she never turned out to be a mental wreck later.

If a 14 year old girl would want to have sex with me today, I'd probably do it.”


Squishyfish”I should just point out that there exist cultures in which parents arrange for their children to have sex with older members of the community, as part of a rite of passage into adulthood.

I would assume that if sex with an older person was innately harmful, these cultures would have self-destructed long ago.”

Chickenlegs:”What pisses me off the most is when you get these teens, say 15 or 16, and they go around sleeping with as many men as they feel like it. Then they sleep with some guy that is like 21 and people point to the guy like he did something wrong. Hey, I say if a teenager is going around getting guys to sleep with em then put the blame where it belongs, right on the teen. None of this, "Oh, he is 21, he should know better." Ill tell you what he knows, he knows that an attractive young energetic girl with boobs wants to sleep with him. Thats what he knows.”

HungryGhost #sexist #crackpot themotte.org

Men and women clearly have different wants in fiction. So taste is biological. And if it's biological, then the very standard by which we judge a good story can shift with the generations.

Suppose I like stories about a Gary Stu who's perfect and loved by everyone. What if I become a tyrant, crack open people's skulls to check whether they share my taste, and execute anyone who doesn't? Only people with good taste get to breed. After a few generations, the world will be filled with people who love Gary Stu, and he'll become the new literary standard. Such is the great providence of nature.

Is the problem men? Is the problem women? I think it's consciousness.

Consciousness gives birth to the ego and to stories. The ego seeks to unify the me of the past with the me of the future. Unification across time. Stories and language seek to unify different people through shared myths and a shared destiny. We are all humans. Unification across space. It's a similar process, and both seek to avert contradictions.

People dislike contradictions. But do contradictions cause any physical harm? No, only mental discomfort. Animals don't agonize over them the way humans do. People suffer when their wishes contradict one another, when the me of tomorrow regrets the actions of my past self, even though I acted according to my wishes at the time. Likewise, people feel discomfort when they realize that others are genuinely different, that their wishes can contradict and conflict with their own.

Consciousness is ultimately about the self. The greatest pain and the greatest fear of humanity is the loss of self. At its core, it's losing your body. Losing your limbs, being unable to walk, unable to see. But it's also growing old, losing bodily functions, becoming unable to eat or speak.

Abe_user, Sengkelat #sexist boards.straightdope.com

Abe_user: “’ve been reading about the whole R. Kelly indictment:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020605/ap_en_mu/r__kelly_accusations_14

And it occurs to me that since statutory rape crimes are ‘strict liability’ (i.e. the older person’s knowledge/lack thereof does not affect the criminal charge), how can you hold a man responsible for doing 14-17 y.o girls who look, act and dress like 18-19 y.o. s

These laws were written at a time when girls didn’t pretend to be older women, so perhaps its time for a change. Yes, it is difficult to prove that a guy ‘knew’ she was 17 not 18, but really…but if its ok for companies to sell thongs to 12 y.o., how’s a dude to know if he is commiting a crime??”

Sengkelat: ”Blaming the victim” always sounds like a bad thing to do. But if a 17 year old girl chases after and ends up sleeping with an older man, is she a victim?
My sister, when she was 16, dated a 22 year old guy. She was stoked that she got this guy. Both parties were pretty happy with the arrangement, and she wasn’t traumatized or permanently scarred. I certainly wouldn’t say she “entrapped” him, since he had the power to decline anything she offered, but at the same time I would say she’s 50% responsible for any statutory rape that occurred. Or possibly more, if she lied about her age. Am I now “blaming the victim”?
As for the laws, it’d be nice if there was a better way to define if a person is capable of giving consent other than their age. I know 25 year olds that don’t have the maturity to understand the consequences of their actions, and I have known minors who had better judgment than many adults.”

Jim #wingnut #sexist #conspiracy #transphobia blog.reaction.la

[From “How to win the 2026 Midterms”]

For a long time, being an enemy of America, democracy, freedom, marriage 1.0, or the West has been without adverse consequences, while support for America, democracy, freedom, marriage 1.0, or the West was apt to get you blacklisted, beaten up, your property destroyed, and likely to result in you being charged with trumped-up crimes

For a long time, rigging elections has been without adverse consequences, while complaining about election rigging was apt to get you blacklisted, beaten up, your property destroyed, and likely to result in you being charged with trumped up crimes

If Trump’s administration can and does bring charges for a single incident of 2020 ballot-box stuffing before the mid terms, he wins the mid terms

If he cannot, he did not really win 2024, he will probably lose the mid terms, and it will not matter much whether he wins or loses

The impact of Musk’s coup against USAID, and the massive layoffs we are now seeing in woke gaming and woke entertainment, suggests that Trump really did win in 2024

The latest woke movie is Netflix’s Narnia adaptation with a transsexual Aslan. The trailer was released, people reacted as you might expect, and the Netflix movie division suffered massive layoffs the following day. Presumably the layoffs have been in the works well before the trailer was released, but they may have been sitting on them for a while to see how “modern” the “modern audience” is

If woke gaming and a transsexual Aslan can lose people their jobs, ballot-box stuffing can get people jail time. We shall see

Rev. John Lovell and Josh McPherson #psycho #fundie #wingnut #dunning-kruger #transphobia #forced-birth #sexist globalextremism.org

Warrior Poet Society, the gun-training company run by former Army Ranger John Lovell, scheduled a two-day course there on clearing a building alone[…]with an AR-15[…]
His congregation[…]began in 2023 as an offshoot of Grace City Church in Wenatchee, Washington, whose pastor, Josh McPherson, wrote an ebook titled Christian Nationalism[…]
The White House invited McPherson and 99 other pastors to mark the first 100 days of Trump’s second term. Bonny has described him as a firm believer “that government must ‘submit’ to religion”[…]
McPherson went on the podcast of Frank Turek to promote Freedom Con[…]McPherson praised the Black Robe Regiment, preachers of the Revolutionary era who he said “were willing to fight for and defend truth in real time with real bullets, in real battle.” Turek interjected, “We’re not advocating violence, just to be clear.” The pastor warned that if Americans neglect peaceful means, “there will come a time where we’re forced to either compromise or stand and fight”[…]
McPherson also posted that if Christians and churches “simply showed up and voted their conscience… we’d flip Washington State”[…]
McPherson’s men’s ministry, Stronger Man Nation, sells the conference merchandise, which includes a “Dragon Killer” shirt[…]The ministry also runs Project ManCard, a four-day rite of passage for boys 14 to 17. “Boys were made to kill dragons”[…]At the end of ManCard the boys recite a creed that closes with “I’ll kill the dragon. I’ll win the girl”[…]
[Lovell] toured the U.S. Capitol and posted four takeaways. Number one[…]that the country’s Christian founding is “simply undeniable.” Number three came with a chili pepper emoji and was aimed at other pastors. “Pastors are derelict in their duties as shepherds if they do not speak out on the policies that liberate or enslave their fellow man”[…]
The day before the 2024 election, Lovell wrote, “Vote Trump, folks,” and said a Trump win would mean “far less aborted babies, & chemically castrated kids”

Kaeaiigardenerwolf #sexist #psycho #god-complex tumblr.com

While I respect a woman not reproducing for whatever reason, I do not think women should have to be forced/coerced to not have kids any more than I think a woman should be forced/coerced to have kids.

I think we need to encourage women who want to be mothers to raise children with other women instead of with a man (which is more aligned with social mammalian nature anyways). The workload and child rearing would be split more amicably since women are superior both as parents and workers. I also want women to know that you can in fact select and purchase sperm at banks, and also get them selected for sex so you never have to worry about birthing a demon moid.

Lesbians do this shit all the time, this is why males are so scared of them.

If more women adopt this style of child rearing we can have males become more like government experiments, produced mainly to be experimented on/vivisected so we can eventually live without males and our species can have our genetic diversity via artificial sperm.

I believe with less patriarchal pressure for women to be broodmares, the human population would naturally taper down to a reasonable 500 million-1 billion (aka the population we had a century ago) and we could just focus on improving the quality of life of said stable population with each passing generation without compromising our environment.

As far as utopias go, this is the one that logistically makes the most sense.

#radfeminism#terfblr#radical feminism#gender critical#terf#feminism#radblr#misandry#men are evil#radical feminists do interact

Impress Polly #sexist clovenhooves.org

What I've Ditched

1. Male-centered thinking. 

For example, I believe in socialism. For women. In our own societies with no men. The subjugation of women caused private property, not the other way around. It's more basic. The Marxists think the sex-based oppression of women -- if they can even recognize it as sex-based anymore -- is all about economics and not physical power and thus if we do away with class distinctions and establish a world composed entirely of shared property, male violence against and control of women will just sort of metaphysically disappear. They don't recognize the obvious primacy of our different biology as a causative agent. They're fucking delusional that way. Only women can truly understand our own oppression. I am also done trying to save the world. Those who claim we have to save the world to end our own class oppression as women can only reach this conclusion by conflating our interests with those of our oppressors: men. 

Marxists can never and will never solve the natural conflicts of interest that exist between working class men and women as a whole. Only by removing men from the equation can you bring labor interests into consistent alignment with those of women. 

Designer_Date2299 #sexist reddit.com

Gender roles for men should absolutely continue to be enforced

Of course I don’t think we as a society should continue forcing the restrictive and oppressive gender roles we historically pushed into women, but men (and women) absolutely benefit from men being held to theirs, that’s just the way it is. I mean all of it, keeping their hair short, dressing like they care about themselves, dedicating themselves to a career and a family to provide for, all are pro social requirements in my mind. If you think this is problematic you are probably just blinded by privilege and fortunate enough to not know true oppression.

TLDR: male gender roles are good, actually, sorry incels.

Megyn Kelly #sexist mediamatters.org

From the September 30, 2026, edition of SiriusXM's The Megyn Kelly Show

MEGYN KELLY (HOST): It's just so wrong. Again, why? Why does the media choose to call her Jane Doe and choose to name the men. I'm just going to tell you right now, if her identity is revealed, I am going to name her. I am going to name her

I am not OK with the accused having their identities plastered all over the newspapers and accusers getting this blanket of protection from the courts and/or the media. Now the courts I can't do anything about, but the media I can

Why? Why does she get the blanket of anonymity? Even if she's a victim. I'm sorry, but that's just — that doesn't make any sense

If you really want anonymity, unfortunately you have to stay out of the court system. If you file a civil lawsuit asking for money damages, you are in the court system and your name is as fair game as the names of the defendants. And I just — I don't think we can continue this farce of pretending all accusers are actual victims whose identities must be protected and all defendants are presumed guilty, and their lives will be ruined the second the complaint is filed. This is fucked up. I'm just done with this

Kawaiigardenerwolf / spaguetti-betti #sexist #psycho tumblr.com

(Kawaiigardenerwolf)

I think ultimately at first we should see sex separated schools, women get a standard education where as males are tested to see if they qualify for standard education and eventual but limited interaction with female civilization, and the ones who disqualify are castrated and put in mines or some shit. Based on what I have studied with animals a good sex ratio is 10% male and 90% female. Just enough to prevent inbreeding.

(Spaguetti-betti)

eah, I agree they turn demonic at the start of puberty, because that's when their sexual desire and hormones flood their bodies and basically make them incapable of seeing women and girls as anything other than a source of great pleasure. Basically the orgasm for them is a high, and they constantly seek highs and have, in general more than woman, an addictive personality or nature. I have more thoughts on that, especially cause I have ADHD, I feel like I understand them better than the average woman. Castrating is not going to happen, cause males protect each other and they are in powerful positions currently. Average man hates feminists and looking for excuses to hate us more and inflict more violence on us. Average woman is a pick me and/or a boy mom, so will protect her precious rapist son from anything.

I agree with the 10% males thing. I wish it was 1%, but inbreeding :(

(Kawaiigardenerwolf)

I used to think it was puberty that made them demonic too. But in recent years and in my observation they are literally born fucked up. Usually a pre pubescent boy who is demonic is the result of environmental and genetic shortcomings, things which will cause girls to turn in on themselves, but boys to lash out. There are cases where literal 6 year old boys brought guns to school and shot their teacher or tried to strangle them. I agree with your averages, and in general I find males to be a lost cause, but I think it's entirely possible to uplift women, even ones in the depths of pickmeism, to overcome their self loathing, male worshipping programming. It might be harder to reprogram a woman who has birthed a male, due to imprinting, but I think young girls can be led down the path of self respect simply by being present as a female role model.

Mike Stone #wingnut #sexist #racist #fundie #conspiracy henrymakow.com

Now child abductions, child sacrifice, and Jewish ritual murder have been going on for centuries, and continue to this day, but that's not what I'm talking about.
What I'm addressing here is the huge number of recent cases in which a seemingly normal parent flips out and suddenly murders their own children.

Lindsay Clancy, who murdered her three young children, received an enormous amount of attention, but there are hundreds of other cases in just this year alone which haven't made the news.


Lindsay Clancy, who murdered her three young children, received an enormous amount of attention, but there are hundreds of other cases in just this year alone which haven't made the news.

Almost all of these murderers are women (white women, to be precise), however, feminized men have now joined the fray.

In Florida, a feminized man named Ivan Roa just murdered his 17-year-old twin children, Carlo and Melanie, before killing himself.
Other feminized men are doing the same. It's an epidemic that no one is talking about.

What's causing these parents to flip their lids and murder their own children? We know women are unstable to begin with, but is their inherent instability enough to compel them to murder their own children?

I think one largely contributive factor is drugs. In fact, I would bet money that not only are all of these murderous parents taking drugs, especially psychiatric drugs, but that every single one of them also took the Stupid-19 vaccine.

Along with the drugs, are chemtrails, food preservatives, fluoridated water, electro magnetic frequencies from cell phones and microwaves, 5G technology, satanic imagery in music, television, books, and movies, and, in the case of men, extreme feminization.

There's also demonic possession, which goes hand-in-hand with the subversion of the Catholic Church and people's abandonment of traditional Catholicism. Add all that up and it's actually a surprise that we don't see more people flipping their lids and murdering their own children.

Agenderpositivity69 #sexist #psycho tumblr.com

why in the world would we need to save xys in these situations? what's the material benefit of this? even from a pro reproductive standpoint it's illogical. nearly no males are needed to continue the species/country's population. so nearly all males are biological baggage that do nothing but cause destruction in the wake of their sexual frustration

even as a romantic breeder who thinks males are these important contributers to society (kek) it makes zero sense to give them equal priority as women and children during a rescue. barely any of them ever actually make children with women and in those cases they quite often still don't contribute anything positive to women's and children's lives

in areas of crisis, single males (and coupled ones, dear straight women) resort to horting resources from women and children, then exchange them for sex (rape). they also go around raping and killing for the hell of it. women know this instinctively, that's why they're scared of crisis. males are a bigger threat than natural disaster could ever be

why does 'human kindness' only ever mean offering a merciful hand to xy rapists? why the fuck are women endangering themselves to help males during precarious situations? i can tell you why, because this shit is just an extension of heterosexual females' feelings of 'love' (sexual submission) to males. all of these notions of female generousness and mercifulness, it's just sexual submission to males. think christianity's mother mary who getd biblically venerated for basically being raped by a god to have a child without being asked first

#blackpill feminism#blackpill lesbian#lesbian blackpill#bp feminism#bp separatism#feminism#radfeminism#gendercritical#4b#4bmovement#6b4t#radblr#terfblr#pro terf#gencrit#bp lesbian#lesbian bp#terfposting#terfs please interact#pro misandry#feminist#radical feminists do interact#blackpilled feminism#bpf#female liberation#radfemsafe#radfemblr#decenter men#female separatism#total moid death

Rumpelnstinsky1 #sexist #psycho twitter.com

@Debonperc

“She should not have gone to a fraternity.”

So you agree, men are inherently dangerous, and women should treat them all as if they are a potential threat.

Rumpelnstinsky1:
image
[Image: A chicken sits in a a giant pot full of butter atop a fire while saying to a hungry pack of wolves “I can do whatever I want that doesn't give you the right to eat me]

FrustrateIncorp,rumpelnstinsky1 #racist #sexist twitter.com

rumpelnstinsky1: image
[ image of a chicken sitting in a pot full of butter and slathering herself in butter in front of a pack of hungry wolves. The chicken says “ I can do whatever I want. That doesn't give you the right to eat me” to the hungry, hungry wolves]

@uranoutofluck

He's saying that men are unable to control themselves because they're predators.

FrustrateIncorp:If I drove into a poor, black neighborhood screaming the N-word in my Louis Vuitton suit and starting counting money on the hood of my Porshe, you wouldn't say I got what I deserved when they beat the shit out of me and steal everything?!? You would condemn them? Console me? LIAR

NonNTFailure #sexist incels.is

When normies say “pedophile” what they really mean is a sub5 man.
Probably water for most of you but when normies think of a pedophile what they really think of is just some poor, high-inhib uglycel.
Which is actually retarded as fuck because historically most pedophiles, rapists, child groomers etc have been people that the foid personally knew—such as dads, uncles, family friends, cousins, etc.
It’s just like what this one cel told me earlier online today, that pedophilia outrage is fake and a way for feminists to hide their eugenics.

Voodoochile #sexist #psycho boards.straightdope.com

http://www.abcactionnews.com/stories/2004/06/040622teacher.shtml
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5299732
Recently in Florida a 23 year old female teacher has been accused of having sex with a 14 year old boy

Im not sure how people got this reversed, but she was not the one in the position of power; he was. As soon as they had sex, he had the power over her, not the other way around. He, literally, was fucking authority. He had her career in his hands at the same time he had other things.

What power had she over him? What, give him an F in reading class? 14 year olds arent stupid, the kid had to be aware that she had far more to lose than he did. No, the power was in his hands. If anything, I think a good case could be made that this is an issue of a male taking advantage of a female when she was in an emotionally delicate state. Show me a 14 year old who is stupid enough to think a junior-high or high-school teacher can have a lasting bad effect on them enough to be coerced into having sex and Ill show you a 14 year old in 5th grade.

Hell, [bshes only 23, barely out of childhood herself. The older I get, the less of a difference I see between a 23 year old and a 14 year old. Kids are kids.

And yes, I for one recently have a daughter. I believe, and will tell her so, that if something feels good, and she think she wants to try it, to go for it. Thats how one learns. If she doesntlike it, great. If she does, great. But then Im raising a human being, not a unit.
Who the hell cares if some people have sex a year ealier than the norm? So the hell what? Not being like everyone else is something to be proud of, not worried about.

Mike Stone #sexist #wingnut #transphobia #conspiracy henrymakow.com

Are you overweight, over the age of 25, or a mother of young children, and insist on your dating profile that any man who approaches you be over six feet tall, have perfect teeth, and make over $100,000 a year?

If you answered yes, you're the reason why so many men today would rather play video games than spend time with women.

Do you have tattoos, dyed hair, a nose ring or piercings? Are you planning to get tattoos, dyed hair, a nose ring or piercings? Do you dress provocatively in order to attract male attention, but respond with outrage when men whom you consider to have lower status than yourself give you their attention?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, you're the reason why so many men today have lost all respect for women.

Did you vote for Hillary Clinton, the impostor Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris in any of the last three presidential elections? If you had been on the jury for the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, would you have voted for acquittal?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, you're the reason why women of the past were not allowed to vote or sit on juries, and why they should not be allowed to do so today.
<...>
Do you ship your children off to daycare or school every morning so you can go to work? Do you hire babysitters to watch your children at night so you go out drinking, dancing, and fornicating? Do you refuse to have children so you can go out drinking, dancing, and fornicating?
<...>
Are you in a relationship with a man but constantly looking to upgrade? Are you in a relationship with a man but flirt and fornicate with other men? Is your body count more than one? Do you even have a body count?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, you're the reason why society is collapsing, why almost every man in America today is feminized beyond repair, and why every city in the country has turned into a third-world shithole.

Be honest, face the truth - you're nothing but a gold-digging harlot.

RoadRunner8195 #sexist #psycho #dunning-kruger reddit.com

The truth is that the Jane Doe supporters wish she was assaulted more than wishing she was not, which proves their compassion is not out of care for her but just performative.

There has been so much back and forth regarding the Cornell 7 allegations. The side which is supportive of Jane Doe loves to preach about believing her, and the other side is quite skeptical and/or calling it a false accusation. The odd thing is people care more about being right on the internet than about her well being, and are therefore rooting for her to have been raped, and would be disappointed if she wasn’t. This proves these people don’t care about her but are just being performative so they can shout “I am Jane Doe” for attention and hating on men, similar to picking the bear.

nahini #psycho #sexist arstechnica.com


I'm perfectly willing to admit being attracted to minors, and I challenge anyone who thinks that makes me the least bit perverted, or "sick" (I'm 25, btw). When girls sexually mature around 12-14, calling a 16 year old a "child" and trying to stigmatize the idea of being sexually attracted to her is rather dubious, to say the least. I am not, however, attracted to actual children...

Originally posted by tpg0007:
Maybe we should rethink the definition of "children."
In short, this.

------

I understand parents dislike the idea of their girls having relationships with older men, and let's be honest, parents tend to get apoplectic whenever the sexuality of their daughters (especially their daughters) is concerned, regardless of the guy's age. Fine. I'm not a parent, but I understand being protective. On the other hand, maintaining that a 15 or 16 year old girl, while no doubt somewhat immature, is incapable of having consensual sex, is nonsense.

So, Pamel, in your story, there's difficulty, because the man was already in a position of power, authority, and influence over the girl, so that may complicate things. How can anyone tell the degree to which she was coerced by him? It may be impossible, even for her, to know. I'm not sure the best way to deal with those cases. Keep in mind, however, that there's certainly an amount of coercion in every human interaction, especially where sex is concerned. So, it's muddy. I am of the opinion, however, that it's entirely possible for a 30 year old and a 15 year old to have a free, non-coercive, consensual sexual relationship. And if they do, the 30 year old shouldn't be demonized or called a pervert. It just might be tricky to tell whether the relationship is, in fact, non-coercive. I'll grant you that. Let's be clear, though (just as an aside). Even if it is, it doesn't make the 30 year old a pervert. It may make him an asshole and a bully, but there's nothing perverted (or paedophilic) about being attracted to a sexually mature individual, regardless of the age difference involved.

malacki655 #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Female privilege is a real thing

I am writing this after just finding out that Christa Pike got her execution paused at the last minute. Yes, Christa Pike, the woman who lured an innocent girl into the woods, tortured her to death, kept a piece of her skull as a trophy and tried to kill another inmate in prison. A federal court is halting her execution to consider whether her abusive childhood was taken into account. No joke, look it up.

And of course, we can't forget the Lindsay Clancy case where a woman strangled her three children to death with premeditation but was almost acquitted (and might get the case dismissed) because boohoo she felt a bit sad.

And finally, you have the Cornell hoax where a woman willingly took drugs, alcohol and engaged in group sex with some frat dudes (check the original police report) only to take back her word and claim she was forced in order to save her reputation. Now the internet wants to lynch the men accused.

Do you see the common thread in all three cases? I'll tell you, it's women not being held responsible for their actions. No matter what they do, they are the victim. And that is the conceit of feminism. It tells us women are equal to men, therefore deserving equal rights, but also women can't be held equally responsible for their actions. Well guess what, rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. If you want the same rights as men, don't complain if you are held to the same moral or legal standard! Abolish female privilege now!

TostinoKyoto #sexist #psycho reddit.com

The Jane Doe in the Cornell University rape case could have made better decisions, and that should be okay to say out loud.

We've seemingly become so adamant to protect and comfort rape victims that we become angry when someone dares to suggest that the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions objectively played a role in their victimization. Apparently, this is commonly referred to as "victim blaming."

Whether we want to admit it or not, there are instances where blaming the victim of a crime to some degree, regardless if it's rape or not, is valid. None of us have any right or logic to live our daily lives and think that bad things can't happen to us, or that there aren't bad people who are waiting for us to slip up and let our guard down in order to take advantage of us.

It's not wrong to point out, in this case, that not enough was done on part of the victim to mitigate or minimize the risk of being sexually assaulted. Yes, we know people shouldn't rape, but pointing out the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions isn't the same as apologizing for or legitimizing rape like so many seem to think.

As much as I hate it, we don't live in a society that will ever be free from rapists. So maybe that's something we should keep in the back of our heads before we ever decide to go to a frat house full of horny men and drink and do ketamine? I don't understand the mindset that would think that anyone should be entitled to engage in risky behavior like that and be immune from danger or consequence.

Anon #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

femininity and masculinity are mystifications, they're not real. there are only femaleness (expensive gametes, internal gestation) and maleness (cheap gametes, needs a host to reproduce). the human male is a particularly vicious and highly specialized sexual endoparasite. that is his only directive and the core of his psyche - everything he thinks and feels, how he sees the world, is rooted in it.

"abuser soft boys" shouldn't shock you any more than queer feminist girlcock rapists do, they're simply an adaptation to achieve the same end a bara roidpig or a right wing chud would pursue - infect your soma to 3d print more of his germline (or engage in other male typical/parasitic sexual behaviors even if they're areproductive). this is another reason why nothing beyond looks and utility should ever be a consideration in female mate choice, and god help you if you sacrifice any of that for an assumption that you're getting a "gentle soul". the "good", "selfless" male personality you are envisioning biologically cannot occur in something that evolved to divert your body's resources from self-maintenance and other reproductive effort to providing for his offspring exclusively - in simple terms, cause you harm for his own self-perpetuation.

if this is not convincing, another fact worth considering is that a 20 year old male and the same male 30 years later will always be completely different people. a 20 year old kindchad (who could once afford to be kind because he was a chad) can easily become a pedophile sex tourist or a resentful abuser with abandonment issues as he declines. that's on top of the fact that a male's sexuality is innately designed to become more entropic/degenerate the longer he is alive.

jlibourel,globetrotter #sexist styleforum.net

Jlibourel : “Let me get this straight: A drunk girl at LINGERIE PARTY, f'r chrissake, gets felt up, and this is a cause for outrage? I wonder what the cops' reaction to all this would have been had they been summoned, as some posters have suggested.

Given the OP's description of his attire, I am assuming "lingerie party" meant one in which the partiers wore undergarments, not one where lingerie was sold, on the order of a Tupperware party in days of yore. (Do they still have those things?)”

Globetrotter: “yeah, Jan, makes me feel old. if a girl got drunk and passed out at a party when I was a kid, somebody probably would have driver her home and ****ed her, and everybody would consider it pretty fair. as a father of a son and daughters, I am conflicted on the changes”
Jlibourel ^I think the fact the girl was wearing lingerie and seemingly nothing else puts the matter into a different dimension. I mean, having too much to drink at party is something most of us have done in our wayward youth. A &quot;lingerie party&quot; sounds more like a borderline ****--at least to this old fud!

FrustrateIncorp,rumpelnstinsky1 #racist #sexist twitter.com

rumpelnstinsky1: image
image of a chicken sitting in a pot full of butter and slathering herself in butter in front of a pack of hungry wolves. The chicken says “ I can do whatever I want. That doesn't give you the right to eat me” to the hungry, hungry wolves

@uranoutofluck

He's saying that men are unable to control themselves because they're predators.]

FrustrateIncorp:If I drove into a poor, black neighborhood screaming the N-word in my Louis Vuitton suit and starting counting money on the hood of my Porshe, you wouldn't say I got what I deserved when they beat the shit out of me and steal everything?!? You would condemn them? Console me? LIAR

ivan_astikov #sexist #psycho boards.straightdope.com

I’d be more inclined to believe Vidal’s account than anyone’s that has posted in this thread.

Regardless of what the statute books determine rape to be, why is it so difficult to consider that Polanski’s victim might have been a teenage slut?

Because even if she was a “slut,” it’s still rape to have sex with a 13 year old girl? And by her account, it was not just statutory rape but forcible rape?

Well, she would say that, wouldn’t she?

As for her age, I’d bet that at least 50% of males on this planet, if they had a physically mature, attractive young lady waving her tush at them, would have done the same thing. Knowing her age might decrease that number, but there still wouldn’t be only Roman Polanski answering the call.

Well, the judge believed her testimony. Why are you so determined to paint her as a conniving little slut–because Gore Vidal said so?

Why is everyone else so determined to paint her as an innocent young victim, is just as valid a question. I’m giving Polanski the benefit of the doubt, because I’ve heard enough stories about teenage “star-fuckers”; what are your reasons for believing her account of the event?

I’m no saint by any stretch. But I wouldn’t rape a 13 year old girl who thought she was willing. Nor would I forcibly rape any woman.Seriously, are you such a weak kneed pussy that you can’t hold your own against a 13 year old girl? Do you truly have less character and force of will than a 13 year of child?

Can you point out where I said I’d be among the 50% that would? I know I am a honorable man, but I don’t know that about everyone else. Polanski might not be a honorable man, but I wasn’t there when this incident happened, so I’m not going to pontificate about what an evil man he is, based on one girl’s testimony. Now, if you can show this was not an isolated incident, I might be more inclined to join in with your faux outrage.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

>In scorpion flies, when the males’ rape-arms were disabled by researchers, females fought males off. The “disabled” male scorpion flies soon brought females “food gifts.” These “gifts” threw females off-guard, enabling males to rape females even more easily.

Exactly - males do not possess morality and everything they do is a transaction in pursuit of one sided benefits. You can't make them genuinely good, you can only eliminate their option to be bad and force them to consider displaying good behavior as a viable pathway to obtaining said benefits (you'll still have to counter their adaptations on the go, because they'll never stop trying to dupe you). This is why they abruptly change their behavior when you're "bagged" (see: countless stories from women whose husbands were perfect unicorns until a child was born). They no longer have a reason to feign niceness because you'll stay either way.

Optimal strategies would be countering male resource monopolization (having as much money as possible) and (for straight women who absolutely need male company) feigning commitment by leading men to believe that you will soon become a secure option, siphoning resources from them in the meantime. Remember, they benefit from your guilt and your maladaptive desire to be the bigger person. Moids want you to empathize with their violent manipulative attempts to secure reproductive success while guilting you for looking out for yourself. They live by the notion of "do as I say, not as I do".

Lovecrafts #sexist #psycho mmo-champion.com

The moment you start victim blaming, is the moment you make it much easier for rapists to actually get away with it. You can recognize that it's dumb to act in a manner that would entice people, but in the end a no means no. I also clearly said 'act', because I don't believe that dress is a valid way of enticing people. Just because a girl is wearing a tiny dress doesn't mean she is trying to entice men.

Lovecraft's: “Sorry but as soon as she willingly starts making choices to do things that will incapacitate herself from protecting herself (getting blackout drunk with strangers and shooting up drugs), then she has to shoulder some of the responsibility. Honestly think how much people would learn if they figured out that bad choices lead to horrible consequences. “

Xaelai: “Praytell why ELSE she'd be wearing skimpy clothing?

I can't think of a single practical use for wearing skimpy clothing other than trying to look sexually pleasing to men. Unless she's Bi or lesbian or something and trying to look nice to other girls, but still. Is there really a need to be walking around in public dressed like that? “

Anon #sexist #homophobia lolcow.farm

Their core belief is not having any beliefs, just whatever gets them closer to their goal, namely, pussy.

They only care about the security they get through submission to authority, as the male always figures his allegiance to whatever/whoever he’s pledged himself to guarantees him the ability to reproduce eventually. If he didn’t believe this, he wouldn’t do it at all.
The authority these men want most is a sexy underaged mommydom dedicated to the task of draining him of his cum (the malfoid), which would be his most optimal path to reproduction. No middleman, quite literally. Since these unicorns hardly ever appear in reality, and leave the common man desperate and wanting, anyone and anything can hijack the male submission drive and completely obliterate whatever “beliefs” he previously purported to have. Charlatans plunder his wallet, capitalists plunder his labor, fags plunder his butt, Etc.

The male is like a little sperm swimming steadfast into darkness, using the programming that propels it towards the egg, despite the fact it’s is in another man’s intestines, or a monitor lizard, or a hole in a couch cushion.

Myu3u / kawaiigardenerwolf #sexist tumblr.com

(@myu3u): My family always get pissed off when I claim I would rather die than birth a male, like sorry I care for my life and sanity

(@kawaiigardenerwolf): i mean male fetuses have been proven to be more resource intensive than female fetuses. Here's a quote from University of Cambridge:

"Male baby pregnancies are more likely to result in complications, possibly because they grow faster in the womb and require more nutrients and oxygen than supplied by the mother through the placenta”

(@myu3u): So, actual parasites

(@kawaiigardernerwolf): from the moment of conception yea basically

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

Cosmic dualism fallacy. Because moids are specialist mutants, they need to believe that women are their negative "counterpart" with features that are "fully opposite". It's one of the ways they fight the nagging little voice telling them that they are merely an offshoot of a standard, complete human form, not an equal puzzle piece in a symmetrical, complementary set of two. This applies to both behavior (femininity and masculinity meme) and appearance.

Because of this, their idea of beauty will always be incomplete, and everything they create will always be ugly, imperfect and uncanny in some way, no matter how hard they try. If you gave a moid a hypothetical unlimited ability to make people, he'd make a "perfect" waifu utilizing his own peferred parameters, then dump her for a naturally occurring beauty as his creation begins to look grotesque and mutilated by comparison. This is one of the reasons why a male plastic surgeon would be an enormous risk. It's not that they're lazy, bogging you on purpose, or sadly limited by current state of the art. It's that they are literally, biologically incapable of making you beautiful. They think they know what beauty is, and then don't find it beautiful, because it's not.