She’s only one magacock away from leaving woketardism

(Photo is of Olympic Figure Skater but I do not recall name)

High School Gang Rape...I blame the girl

Ok. Girl went to homecomming dance, was waiting for her dad to pick her up*, then was gangraped and beaten.

Horrible story.

But, alot of stories overlook the *. The astrisk being, she started drinking large amounts of alcohol, clearly underage, around a bunch of guys. And I am willing to bet she wasn't dressed very conservatively either, being a high school girl coming from a dance.

So, you know what? Hold those accountable for the rape and beating, but I fault the girl on this as well, for putting herself in the compromising situation. Im not going to go all the way and say "this was solely the girls' fault", but I will say she did, in a way, bring this on herself.

If this was a girl walking to the parking lot and was attacked out of nowhere, then its all on the rapists. But when you are going to put yourself in a bad position, I hold you accountable for that just as much as the guys who committed the act. She shouldnt have been drinking. She shouldnt have been in a dimly lit area with a bunch of other guys who had been drinking. And I am going to make an assumption that she was probably dressed a bit slutty. (Could be wrong). But she is not a total victim here, in my opinion.

Flame away, I know its bound to happen.

Breasts are how women communicate with God. It's why they grow during pregnancy - good women spend more time speaking w the lord, asking him how to be mothers

This is also why women with small breasts are evil. They've abandoned communication w God and you can see it from their chests

Athiest women try to trick you with implants, but no true Christian believes them. The lord speaks only through big naturals

The greatest lie ever told is that the male is the same species as women

> Tbf there are some things in common

This tweet shows just how good males have gotten at mimicking women. The reason why women buy into the lie that males and women are the same species is because the parasite uses female flesh to copy itself and mimics women expertly to convince her he’s part of her species

At the minimum, [to fix the sexual revolution’s problems], the state can take its thumb off the scale. Some (general) ideas to consider:

1. State backs the authority of husbands and fathers instead of criminalizing it.
2. State reforms divorce and child support laws.
3. State deems marriage the only valid and also unimpeachable proof of sexual consent.
4. Scale back the welfare state.
5. State-backed education stops treating boys as defective girls (or worse).
6. State-backed education stops incentivizing useless post-secondary education.
7. State stops engaging in sexual affirmative action across education and work.
8. State stops using sexually disparate outcomes to punish employers.
9. State stops crushing public dissent against pretty lies about the nature of gender roles and the mating dance.
10. State religion drops its hostility towards marriage and incentivizes men (through status) to behave as good fathers.

Women are perpetual minors- They must never act independently of their Paterfamilias or male guardian- Their father, husband, or oldest son. They manage the household/estate when he is gone, and that is the end of it. By turning women into men, or attempting to, we spit in the face of Heaven. Metaphysically, the feminine nature is dependent on and molded by the male nature- Women must always be subordinate to man as the moon depends on the sun's light.

image
image
image

Afk gonna be creating scenarios of my dictatorship misandrist imperial world
Ugh I can't decide whether I want them to be in white burqas to strip them of their humanity and also hypersexualise every inch of their body or make them wear skimpy little pieces for adolescent and child females to lift up. Cuz the little girls, in their cool, sauve practical outfits all push the boy in a white, frilly apron dress to the wall and lift up his skirt. He feels humiliated and cries, while the girls all point n laugh and take a good long eyeful. And then he runs home with tears in his eyes, and tells his mother (me).
I'm furious, as my son has just been defiled (property damage), I ask him what the hell he was doing hanging out with a bunch of girls, that he should have known this would happen. I BEAT THE ABSOLUTE SHIT OUT OF THAT LITTLE SCROTE and lock him in his room for the rest of the day, no supper for him 😂👏 then I get mad at
the girls aswell of course for
damaging my property

This is what you'll be wearing, since you think your cum is so fucking important, be ready to have the colour white be shoved down your throat for the rest of your life

"Mama why can't I wear
different colours like my
siblings??"

"Because white is the utmost
purity, and the colour of your
little seed 🥺, you have to
cover yourself or you'll attract flies"

Most males just ferment into compost instead of cook into a meal.
Create an aggregate example of a male and female human, remove all affectations, shave them bald, and the male will more closely resemble a child than the woman. An out of shape male especially will almost always look more childlike than an out of shape female.

The point of saying this is to demonstrate that male theory often does not align with reality, and the same males who claim that women in general resemble children will simultaneously believe that every individual child more resembles their male parent (even more perplexing that this supposedly applies especially to female children). It’s a paradoxical belief that can be easily explained as the dissonance produced when male subjectivity is incorrectly interpreted as universal objectivity. If evopsych says that children look like males to increase paternal investment and prevent infanticide, evopsych cannot also say women look like children because children make men so aroused they selected for females who look more like children. I could more easily believe the first since there are known mechanisms in place which could produce the effect, but the latter is just an exercise in magical thinking only possible with a piss-poor understanding of how sexual selection functions. More men than not believe their primitive male ancestors had the restraint to keep their dicks in their loincloths because ‘2/10 elbows too pointy’ in order to genetically engineer women of the future to better resemble sexy prepubescents (already an oxymoronic premise), which should further convince you to be skeptical of every claim they make. Everything males say is bullshit, as misogyny takes precedence over the truth. He will argue a logical paradox without taking a single breath in between sentences so long as both statements best follow the misogyny-first-principle. Men get a paranoid thought or dick twitch and call their exhaustive list of rationalizations to justify them science and intellect.

[From “Feminists Cosplaying Character from Porn”]

Feminism is a shit test, and they are, in desperation, giving us the cheat code to pass it

The “Handmaid’s tale” is a porn novel for women

It is often described as fetish novel, biblical Christian sexuality being defined as a fetish

The novel is set in Christian theocracy, where the theocrats enforce biblical policies on sex to raise fertility for everyone, and especially elite fertility. Albeit one of the measures they take to encourage specifically elite fertility (meaning elite males get more pussy, and chicks get more access to elite males) is to cater to the cuckquean sexual fetish under certain very restricted and limited circumstances, which the bible tolerates but discourages. (So this is not unrealistic for a Biblical theocracy, at least to some degree.) The novel is a cuckquean sex fantasy, and these feminists have dressed themselves as cuckqueans

The cuckquean sexual fantasy is a threesome with the protagonist as low status concubine, the higher status wife, and the way, way, way, higher status husband. And these feminists are cosplaying the low low status concubine that got a whole lot of sexy sexy dicking from the high high status male

Cuckoldry is a disgusting perversion, being contrary to survival and reproduction. Cuckqueaning is not, it is entirely normal. It is just preselection up close and personal, and you see all women acting on preselection all the time. (Cinderella) So “the Handmaid” sexual fantasy is just Biblical sex roles plus pre-selection

The male psyche is characterized by mild to severe narcissism. The only reason why it's not rightfully pathologized is because it's part of their biology - they all meet the criteria, so it's their "norm". They come pre-equipped with Dunning-Kruger and positive bias because males are largely expendable (just like their gametes). Their reproductive strategy favors retarded risks because the sole reason why they exist is being a vehicle for genetic diversity and the worst possible outcome for a male is to not reproduce - it's equivalent to death (incels in particular are very truthful about this). So to them, risking everything to make it as a glorified sperm wagon (or doing absolutely anything to spread their DNA as much as possible, whether it's immoral or not) makes sense because it beats quietly waiting to perish. This is what they evolved to do, and absolutely everything about the male mind revolves around this premise. They are not full humans, they are a highly specialized evolutionary crutch with a very narrow task to perform.

(submitter’s note: bunsnuffcat’s hashtags have been converted into sentences.)

marigoldisverynormal: i honestly do think transmascs should be shot in the fucking head if they start a sentence with "feminism is actually about..."

Why Do You As A Masc Have Such Strong Opinions On Feminism? Do You Think Your Opinions Matter Here?

bunsnuffcat: kill all men forever. especially men that harress bunnies for no fucking reason. all bunnies are girls. if youre a bunny boy you need to kill yourself because youre not real. and youre probably a massive piece of shit racist. honestly kinda goes without saying if youre a white transmasc. i just hate transmascs so fucking much you dont understand. every single fucking transmasc i see ever EVER is my ex literally like the same person always. the ex that abused and raped and beat me for years and kept me in the closet and wanted to force masc me bc he wanted to be gay and a faggot. fuck you fuck all men especially transmascs kill them all fur real so we can be safer.

[NOTE: "Secondary bodies" refers to men]

All secondary bodies were once perfect women, at least in the first two months as a fetus, it was no different from a female fetus. And the 6th week is the turning point of its fate, the SRY gene on the Y chromosome begins to be transcribed, producing SRY protein to turn the primordial gonads that should have developed into ovaries into testes. Starting from the 8th week, when it only weighs 2 grams, the Y chromosome gene releases up to a hundredfold of testosterone through the testes, beginning a comprehensive downgrading process (masculinization) on its brain.

Irreversible Fetal Brain Masculinization Degradation

1. Pruning of neural networks in the empathy language awareness region Fundamentally limits the capacity to construct advanced conscious communication

2. Highly lateralized brain Left and right hemispheres tend toward independent operation, lacking a holistic view, adept at linear logical thinking, modular science-oriented brain

3. Approximately 2.5 times larger sex drive region Sex drive becomes its core motivator

4. Specialized amygdala and weakened prefrontal cortex Instinctual fight-or-flight reactions, high stress, difficult emotional control

(Translated)

World War I - White genocide
World War II - White genocide
The Civil War - White genocide
Civil Rights Act - White genocide
Mass immigration - White genocide
Covid Vaccines - White genocide
LGBTQ/Porn - White genocide
Feminism - White genocide

jews facilitated them all.

“Every effort must be made not to recruit women into engineering, but rather to recruit and demand more of men who become engineers,” he said. “Ditto for med school and the law and every trade.”

“If every Nobel Prize winner is a man, that’s not a failure,” he continued. “It’s kind of a cause for celebration. Why can’t our celebration of male excellence in sports be translated into all facets of life. More successful men will mean more happy citizenry and a stronger nation.”

In that same speech, Yenor attacked women who prioritize careers over family and revealed something else about his thinking, something that should frighten everyone:

“Such medicated, quarrelsome and meddlesome women gain their meaning through the seeming participation in the global project. They are agents of the new world, but not new life. Such women are now the backbone of every left-wing cosmopolitan party in the Western world, from the Greens in Germany to the Democratic Party in America. And if our ideal woman is a childless media scold or a barren bureaucratic apparatchik, there is no question whether we can have a future. We can’t. There is a question of whether we deserve one.”

Men using women for what they exist to do - birthing more males, and offloading the burden of reproduction off of men so that men can be (the only) complete, fully functioning human beings both biologically and psychologically, is bad how exactly?

Female continued existence is in fact parasitic. Any moment women aren't incubating, they're an active negative in terms of resources (leeches), and once they reach advanced maternal age, they become complete biowaste. The sexes have different genetic interests because women are

image

wеаk, rеtаrdеd, and easy to kіll. We wuz da Makers and Admins of the species n shit but we're also functionally the most worthless females in the animal kingdom, and we somehow live in a patriarchy lolol. If nothing else, foid coping mechanisms are at least amusing

image

women are not oppressed cus of sexual dimorphism. it’s a very surface level childish analysis. women are the sex with the ability to produce large, resource rich gametes & moids are the sex who can only produce small, inferior gametes.

reproduction, the process through which our species replicates itself occurs because moids impose costs & women bear them. this is why women are oppressed. a male is a parasite by nature & its biological purpose is to replicate its y chromosome at the expense of the host (women).

tomorrow, women could wake up with male bodies and moids with female bodies and moids would still find a way to oppress women because of our one glaring defect; our empathy. we are the sex that gives birth & is biologically wired to look after creatures that don’t look like us.

this is where the empathy gap arises from. this is why scrotes are inherently selfish and evil & will remain this way. no amount of socialisation is going to change this btw. this is where both feminism & radical feminism fails. it has achieved a lot thankfully but it ends here.

in other words: nature/evolution basically came up with the worst possible combination it could. evil moids and retarded women. evil never stop committing evil and retarded never learns. now ofc, some women are exceptions to this. humanity depends on them.

[From “The girls are not OK”]

As our state religion goes lefter and lefter, indoctrination in the schools has become ever more extreme, intense and deranged

The boys are rebelling against maniacal hatred, demonization, and systematic heavy handed discrimination against males, but the girls are sucking it up

And in consequence, going every more evil and insane, ever more sad, crazy, and depressed. And every less likely to have sex, let alone love and romance, and most of all, ever less likely to ever have children

The red pill is an effort to teach men to understand women. But today’s women understand themselves even less

At puberty, girls experience a sudden and extraordinary shock. They become sexually desirable and desired. This is genuinely terrifying, and they have no idea how to handle it[…]and tend to respond in ways that become every crazier and self destructive[…]
Of course women want to be desired, and they especially want to be desired by scary dangerous men. They want to be scared. But they don’t understand that they want this[…]They are very vigorously taught that it is bad, wicked and oppressive, that men are scaring them[…]
Used to be there were social rules[…]and women were firmly steered towards paths for dealing with it[…]
Girls should not be in coed education when they suddenly and shockingly start to get hot. They are not mentally equipped to handle it — not at any age, but even less at that age

Just as the cafeteria diet, the 24/7 availability of tasty snacks, makes them morbidly obese, the ready availability of the dreaded and desired male gaze makes them whores, resulting in hoeflation

Within the official Sex-Positivity doctrine, the constraints that steered girls towards appropriate relationships with men are seen as old-fashioned and oppressive[…]
Men suffer hoeflation, women find that performing sexiness merely degrades them. Gender dysphoria is one of many self destructive female responses to the male gaze

I don’t claim to be an expert on demonology, but there are some basic things we should all acknowledge, understand and know. First, demons are real. They’re fallen angels who chose to follow Satan and were cast out of heaven. This is no myth. This is a fact. They’re spiritual beings and because they know their ultimate end will be the lake of fire, and there’s no redemption possible for them, they hate God and they hate human beings, His image-bearers. They loathe and despise our very souls, and will stop at nothing to bring about as much confusion, corruption and ultimately, as much death as possible.
<...>
I also know others who collect statues and figurines of “angels.” In every case, angels are depicted as feminine. I challenge you to find a statue or figurine of an angel that’s masculine. They don’t exist. In Scripture, angels are warriors; when they appear to human beings, they appear as men. Why, then, has modern culture feminized God’s holy angels to the point where even Christians simply assume they’re all soft, loving, nurturing women? Probably the same reason modern “Churchianity” has emasculated Jesus.
<...>
Friends, homosexuality and transgenderism are just two forms of demonic oppression, which cause extreme mental illness, violence and rage. It’s not normal and no one should be accepting it as “normal” or playing along with this insanity. Satan wants to inflict irreparable harm and death on the most vulnerable among us. Those caught in the trap are victims, and these victims create more victims. Are they beyond the reach of God’s salvation? Not if we have the courage to speak the truth and snatch them out of the devil’s claws. But if we continue to play the games our government and media play, if we continue to kowtow to their delusional demands, fearful of offending them or being “politically incorrect” and refuse to call a man a man, the blood of these victims — and their victims — will be on our hands.

JESSE WATTERS (CO-HOST): Well, Nancy says there will not be a female president in her lifetime, and I say thank God. I hope there's not a female president in my lifetime.
JESSICA TARLOV (CO-HOST): Why would you say that?
WATTERS: You know what many people are saying, Jessica? Many people are saying do women have the --
GREG GUTFELD (CO-HOST): You are just jumping off a cliff just because you're bored.
WATTERS: -- emotional maturity to be president?
GUTFELD: You are just bored.
WATTERS: Many people are saying do they have the personal contacts in the business world to manage the economy? Many people are saying, Greg, do women have the respect of the generals?
GUTFELD: Who said that?
WATTERS: Many people are saying women don't have the sense of humor to be president. I've heard that from a lot of people. None of those things I believe.
But I believe Gavin Newsom could be the first woman president. Because when I hear him talk, he sounds like a woman. The kind of emotional instability, you don't know whether he's having a midlife crisis, an identity crisis, a crisis of confidence.

Femoids have come to adopt negroid culture (such as rap, clothing, drugs etc. and of course being blacked) in a similar way to how they adopted lookism: an aesthetic value blown out of proportion to the point it is self sustaining. For that is what African-American culture is, an arbitrary value desired by women (despite from the benefit of Britsh Broadcasting Company) due to the status it brings, thus it is self sustaining; if you do not follow it you will be ostracised from support groups and potential partners. Men, for the most part as we are much more complex, and as might be expected, only engage in it to impress and court women or gain status and impress friends. A culture with no deeper tenets than bling and violence (which women also are attracted to).
Another reason is how debaucherous it is.

This has all been subsidised of course by the American Jews and their puppet governments.

Men are never mad at women for reasons that have nothing to do with being rejected by them. Immediately pursuing porn of them is a form of panicked reassurance seeking - "no no no, this is not really happening! They're not better than me like mommy, they're not above me like mommy, they're not LEAVING like mommy did! See, there's this video of them groveling before me! Okay, I can feel alright for a few hours now!". For a man, a woman rejecting him is wielding dreadful power over him. She is the mommy withholding the nipple, she is killing him. As most things men think and feel after puberty are tainted by their libido (because their sole purpose is dispensing sperm and dying), the "mommy don't leave, I hate you bitch, I will hold my breath until you come back" infantile rage becomes "I will fuck mommy so hard until she's cock-hypnotized into staying because my cock is very magical actually, it's totally not worthless unlike what those Tinder bitches think". Most male fetishes can be traced back this way, they're nothing but sexualized maladaptive coping mechanisms - coping with female withdrawal, coping with powerlessness, coping with sexual expendability, coping with reality itself. Biologically worthless penises become worship-worthy and precious (while still being portrayed as dirty because men can't help but resent women who lower themselves by being with them), biological garbage that is semen is craved like it's ambrosia, women cease being cold and picky like mommy - not only are they eternally available, they actually become this way after being unavailable because the male is just so irresistible - the essence behind all the pathetically wishful "turning a cold bitch into a cock hungry submissive slut" drivel that helps them cope with how women treat them in real life. In that case porn is supposed to be some sort of a reassuring sequel to being told to fuck off by their most recent beta orbiting subject, which requires that initial rejection to be incorporated into the fictional narrative as something that's "overcome" later.

"The end game in pushing egalitarianism pertaining to the sexes almost exclusively in the West and nowhere else is because they want Western people, particularly those of European descent—AKA white people—to stop procreating," Webbon declared. "True equality for women with men can only be attained if women have all the same opportunities that men have and they never ever will so long as they bear children, so long as women can get pregnant."

"So how do you achieve then equality between men and women?" he continued. "There is only one way to do it: you have to cut off motherhood; you have to cut off procreation. So then what is the outcome? What is the real end game, the real driving incentive and motive of those who have pushed for an egalitarian system as it pertains to men and women, but done so almost exclusively in the West among those of European descent? I'll cut to the chase. Here it is. It's very simple: They want to eradicate white people."

"This is the destruction of the world," Webbon added. "Egalitarianism is not baked into the scripture. It is baked into the fabric of communism. It's baked into the fabric of Marxism. And it is baked into the fabric of Judaism, which I believe is the root of communism. It is the root of transgenderism. It is the root of Marxism. It is the root of all bitter, baseless envy that just seeks to destroy the world."

Who socialized women this way?

Females give birth and nurture a helpless undercooked fetus that's only able to communicate via assorted screams. You misinterpreted one screech from it and it dies. How do women instinctively know what the fetus wants despite not looking like the fetus, not being a fetus herself and having no way to determine what it's thinking through conversation?

This is where the empathy gap comes from. Males did not need to evolve the ability to accurately interpret the mental states of anything that doesn't look like them, so they will never have the same level of concern for women as vice versa. That's why the average whiteknight just wants to get laid, whereas the average pickmeisha is mostly stanning dicks because being mean to males is AbStRaCtLy UnFaIr and ReVeRsE SeXiSt. At the lowest level there is definitely some self interest in the form of prosocial approval and signalling her docility, but it's not as straightforward as stone cold opportunism of "pro female" males.

If women had male levels of empathy/theory of mind, men would be routinely killed and maimed for the kind of treatment they subject women to. No man would tolerate this degree of atrocity while whiteknighting and cooing the gender that perpetrates it. What you refer to as "patriarchy" wasn't established through physical force alone.

What are you going to do if your son is a rapist or an incel? 99% of "feminist" women would promptly make an exemption for him despite tweeting #killallmen all day, even if they're radfems.

Males are universally (and biologically) more impulsive, prone to wishful judgments, are more likely to act upon them and commit the vast majority of crime in every country for this reason. There is no way that the gender that's celebrated for its impulsivity and violence is also somehow "more rational". All males are already crying faggots because you provide them with care and live at the mercy of their feelings. Males who are physically weaker than women are still as violent as other males, so it's not an issue of body size and opportunity. In the end, the only thing about "socialization" that is constant is that you get all the responsibility, and they get all the power. The school system meme is a boymom and failson delusion that doesn't even need any credible studies - today's mode of learning is objectively more forgiving towards "kinetic learners", "delayed maturity" and other unhinged retardation. In the glorious boys' gymnasiums of the past, boys were beaten and raised in a semi-military hierarchy. Male children perform better in coed environments, while female children perform better in single sex ones, which again suggests that male presence is an unnecessary stressor for girls, likely because males exploit female prosocial tendencies and subconsciously solicit babysitting from them. At this point I should expand on the topic of why gender is already abolished for men, but this post is plenty long.

Tl;dr: do you see how it's not biological essentialism that's the problem, but how it's interpreted and perceived?

[From “Ode to the Nineteenth Amendment”]

Female emancipation prevents successful reproduction because it leads to no-fault divorce, which is in practice men-are-at-fault divorce, because it encourages women to pursue options inconsistent with marriage and family, and all this is contrary to the will of God, who prohibits divorce and homosexuality, and commands women to be under the authority first of fathers, then of husbands, and because it leads to demographic catastrophe, the problem of the missing grandchildren. And though it is harmful to everyone’s reproduction, it is particularly and especially harmful to white reproduction[…]
That women are profoundly unhappy with the results of the emancipation that they wanted is illustrated by female porn, which tends to be set in worlds where the main female character magically loses the capability to make such choices[…]Female porn tends to have the main character a strong independent and sadly isolated woman in the modern world, who gets magically transported into magical world where she is no longer isolated, but is firmly under male authority, the magical world being patriarchal, or the character powerless, or the world dominated by predatory male violence[…]
Female emancipation is a shit test. When a man fails a shit test by giving a woman what she demands and passionately believes she wants, she gets twice as unhappy and twice as angry, and this is what surveys of female happiness and mental health show. Surveys consistently show that conservative women are saner and happier than liberal women, conservative Christian women are saner and happier than non Christian conservative women. Liberal women are however similarly crazy and unhappy regardless of faith, possibly because their Christianity is the postChristian faith of God the transsexual father and mother, Jesus the Jewish community organizer, and their God supports female adultery, divorce and abortion

It is well established that Joel Webbon is a deeply misogynistic, antisemitic, white nationalist far-right pastor, so it was no surprise to see him put all of these qualities on display during a recent episode of his "Right Response" program, where he alleged that gender equality is a Jewish plot to eliminate white people and destroy the world.

The crux of Webbon's argument is that nefarious forces are at work providing women with various means and reasons to forgo motherhood in favor of having a career, and that these forces are intentionally doing so in order to "eradicate white people"

"The end game in pushing egalitarianism pertaining to the sexes almost exclusively in the West and nowhere else is because they want Western people, particularly those of European descent—AKA white people—to stop procreating," Webbon declared. "True equality for women with men can only be attained if women have all the same opportunities that men have and they never ever will so long as they bear children[…]"

"So how do you achieve then equality between men and women?" he continued. "There is only one way to do it: you have to cut off motherhood; you have to cut off procreation. So then what is the outcome? What is the real end game, the real driving incentive and motive of those who have pushed for an egalitarian system as it pertains to men and women, but done so almost exclusively in the West among those of European descent? I'll cut to the chase[…]It's very simple: They want to eradicate white people"

"This is the destruction of the world," Webbon added. "Egalitarianism is not baked into the scripture. It is baked into the fabric of communism. It's baked into the fabric of Marxism. And it is baked into the fabric of Judaism, which I believe is the root of communism. It is the root of transgenderism. It is the root of Marxism. It is the root of all bitter, baseless envy that just seeks to destroy the world"

‘Men are taught to see women as objects’ how do you teach someone to not recognize life? It is so obvious this is a deficiency of the Y chromosome and also explains their phenomenon of fetishization. They are incapable of grasping a woman in her entirety because women are XX

How could the male see woman as human when they aren’t? The male view of woman is what the male CAN see of woman. How could a creature with only 1 X chromosome grasp a creature with 2? They CAN’T. It’s not taught. It’s innate

image

How can you teach someone to see LESS of a form of life? Lmao. Have you seen the y? The obvious explanation is that a less evolved creature cannot grasp a more evolved creature. They also can’t love or feel empathy to list only a couple of their vast, vast deficiencies

he Son of God did not bring salvation and redemption to our fallen world through His signs, wonders, or words, but rather, by willingly experiencing an incomprehensibly violent death in the most virile manner, overcoming it at His Resurrection. Jesus gave up His life that the Body of Christ, the Church, would live as the chosen vessel of the salvation He won until He returns. His Church was conceived at the Cross as the precious Blood and Water gushed forth from His most Sacred Heart, which also became the supernatural source of its sacraments.
<...>
This means that God’s perfect, providential plan of salvation was not accomplished through passivity or piety but in the most masculine manner by His Son who took on flesh in order to sacrifice it, even pouring out the final drops of His Blood in the most humiliating, painful way. And we don’t accept His salvation accomplished on Calvary by mere mental assent, acknowledging that such an event actually occurred, but through active participation in this once for all sacrifice— did the courageous centurion who leapt into action to accomplish the will of God, regardless of the costs, and thereafter lived fully and manfully for Christ as the original warrior-monk.
<...>
When the Kingdom came into its earthly existence at the Cross, it was embryonic and extremely vulnerable to the powers of the earth and its prince which were at eternal enmity with it. This is why God, according to His perfect plan and providence, targeted the most indominable, indispensable men of the vaunted Roman military to tend, defend, and extend the Kingdom of God, fulfilling the Edenic duties which Adam abdicated.
<...>
In our time, does God want courageous, countercultural men of faith and action to reclaim the mantle of such a centurion office to tend, defend, and extend the Kingdom of God, which is led, in large part, by too many weak and worldly men, is virtually devoid of defenders, and has lost much land and many souls to the evil Spirit of the Age?

Because women cooperate with men without any rational or utilitarian reason, any woman who chooses to be unconditionally nice to them is (overtly or subconsciously) perceived as a useful idiot/retarded and low value. Understand that it's completely incomprehensible for a male to care for someone on a non-transactional basis - if you choose to do this, you're basically mentally disabled in his eyes, like a human equivalent of a sperm cell giving way to another sperm cell for literally no reason. It's kind of why they berate women for being "irrational" while realizing that they have to be irrational to willingly get involved with men. There are no truly good men, there are bad men who a) can't afford to be openly bad or b) find it more useful to LARP as good at the moment. A male is only as moral as his options allow him to be.

> Look, they are lowering the standards just to admit more women.
> Look, there are gender quotas that must be filled with women and fags.
> We don’t care about men's suffering; they deserve it.
> Since high school, we’ve been investing money to push more women into STEM careers.
> How strange, there are fewer men in colleges.
Women are total badasses, anons!
They are so superior

I’d like to live long enough to see how they suffer when the infrastructure starts to fail significantly, and they only have Africans and Pajeets to fix it

[From “No Children, No Economy”]

By the time the next economic depression bottoms, it will be illegal for women to not have children in many countries:

Underneath all of this, slower than any war and more permanent than any crisis, is something the financial press doesn’t really mention:

People aren’t having any children[…]
Added: the boomers are saying bye sayonara

The generation that inflated every asset class for 40 years through automatic 401k contributions is, somewhere around now, flipping from net buyers to net sellers[…]

That’s why the central planners of the world turned toward mass immigration. You need consumers to keep the GDP growth going, and with fewer children, there were going to be fewer consumers. Of course, the problem is that the macroeconomic models don’t account for quality of consumer, so it’s only very recently that the mainstream economists have begun to realize that lending to immigrants from grasshopper cultures is absolutely guaranteed to crash the banking system because none of those loans will ever be repaid

And this is just on the consumption side. Imagine what lowering IQ, time preferences, and productivity does on the production side, although you don’t need to imagine it anymore. We already know what a calamity diversity and inclusion have turned out to be for the US corpocracy

Indeed, based on a 2025 Danish study, it may even be necessary to ban paid female employment. Such a policy would indubitably be sexist, anti-feminist, and currently illegal in most Western countries. But no one living in any society that elects to show up for the future is going to care what the norms of a few long-dead 21st-century societies happened to be

Egalitarianism is already conceptually dead. It won’t be many more decades before people stop believing in it

> All porn serves a dual purpose. Wanking is secondary, the primary one is supplying the moid with maladaptive copes he craves so much. One of them is selling the moid a deluded idea that he's "showing" irl women what they have to "compete" with, that he has "options". It's how they avenge the fact that it's much easier for you to diversify. That's why moids think of ethots and pornstars as actual gfs. No matter how "intelligent", they actually do on some level think that they have a real chance and that's how they get robbed blind. Ethots make moid narcissism and Dunning-Kruger work for them.

If you have ever been in a long term relationship, you have probably noticed that your moid suddenly wants you to dress more conservatively, gets uncomfortable about you speaking to other males and wants you to get pregnant as soon as possible. This is moid "securing" behavior. It doesn't mean that he is serious about you or that he loves you, what it means is that he wants to reduce your number of other readily available options to soothe his inherent anxiety over fidelity. Of course once he achieves this he won't be happy and he will hate you, because moids are generally at their happiest pouring resources into a void, stuck chasing a carrot on a stick forever

> Daily reminder that if you have a scrot, looking like you're ready to cheat on him any minute is how you keep him happy and interested. All men are fidelity-anxious cucks by nature, but their tastes are based entirely on what other men find attractive.

> So in summary the scrots who read lolcow fantasize about us being their unwilling sex partners/gfs

> No, they fantasize about being people. Moids are deeply traumatized by the realization that they are slaves to sexual arousal, it clashes with their grandiose self image. Porn is capitalizing on their petty need to "avenge" that somehow. Like most porn, moid copefics generally revolve around a theme of regaining control/upper hand in response to having a boner and "punishing" whatever it is that made them horny. The moid in question is trying to repair the anal fissure he sustained from having his defense mechanisms ripped to shreds (which no doubt aroused him too)

image

You can’t explain it, not the profound sadness that most if not all women experience on the basis of being born women and being able to empathize with women. The type of sadness that relates to the assumption (or lack thereof) of a woman’s personhood, freedom, dignity, legitimacy, and autonomy. If seeing women as human, even in theory, may cost him a single orgasm, he will not do it. Nothing relating women will be approached or explored with curiosity or empathy. Only misogyny.(...)

No, men will never understand why women are sad as women. This perspective, if ever presented, simply would not register, and certainly never be seen as a valid assessment according to any value system he deems rational. It will never be anything worthy of a moral repudiation or an emotional response. Never.
They choose instead to believe that women are sad because they weren’t hot and young enough to be sex trafficked themselves. Men can only believe women are sad when men deny them, but the worst, most brutal, most painful, most heartbreaking sadness almost always comes when men pursue them. It’s so utterly backwards it feels like the only thing capable of getting through their skulls is a damn bullet.
I wish a race of aliens came to earth and found these ugly fuckers so valuable, desirable, and indispensable, they abduct, imprison, rape, and an anally impregnate them. They’ll finally be happy living life on “easy mode” by being Glorp’s concubines.

(...)

Moids only use their brain matter to invent novel ways of being retarded. They have given us many new retarded methods to calculate now to best land their squirt in a hole. The only thing men are exceptionally good at is the production of sperm which far exceeds its demand. If you lived on a planet where all of your gametes were special and mattered, you could be milked like a cow too. You can finally find your niche in Glorp’s bed chambers.

[OP of “Having Sex is cucked. Only rape is real” by Karlicel]

If you have consensual sex its giga cucked. you are jestering for a foid even while having sex
can i do this and that like a true cuck
its just giga soy to ask "Can i fuck you" or some shit and do "foreplay", a codeword for beeing an autist retard and jestering to her for wannting a sniff of pussy like the dog you are

MEANWHILE
Rape is so based
If you rape a woman you do it for yourself
No foreplay
You cum as quickly as possible no to get caught
Much more enjoyable
Its just not cucked. You arent a dog if you rape you are a PREDATOR and a good one at that

[Replies]
@warm wool blanket

In my view, rape is not morally wrong when undertaken for the purpose of reproduction

@warm wool blanket:

When assessing the morality of rape framed as reproductive intent, the usual objection centers on the absence of consent and the violation of personal autonomy (cringe). That position, however, raises a further question: if reproductive choice is exercised through the exclusion of partners on the basis of traits such as stature or genetics, to what extent does this resemble a form of selective breeding comparable to practices commonly condemned as eugenic? Food for thought. :feelshmm:
Later
@TooSomething:

If we are realistic, it is true, because if I have to ask a foid, an inferior and far weaker creature, to satisfy my basic needs, then I am a cuck / cucked by society other men
Later
@four1298:

Raping a femoid is the only way to be happy. Just to be clear, I'm not encouraging rape. Don't rape
Later
@SlayerSlayer

its extremely difficult to be a successful rapist

@four1298:

The worst part of raping femoids is going to prison

Why the dickpill is the worst pill

I have seen a bunch of discussions, arguing wether the dickpill or the heightpill are worse. Being ugly, being short or being a mentalcel SOCIALLY EXCLUDE you from sex. You are involuntary celibate because women do not want to have sex with you.

In theory, with a normal size you could still fuck plenty of hookers and get sex.
But with a small dick, you are PHYSICALLY EXCLUDED from sex. You can't even fuck a hooker. You can't even have sex, mechanically speaking. I would argue that its the worst fate, because even a 5'2 manlet dwarf can have plenty of escorts, especially with money.