top

Ben Shapiro #ableist #conspiracy #crackpot #pratt #psycho #racist #sexist #transphobia #wingnut thebulwark.com

The Daily Wire Is Quietly Shooting a Pro-ICE Movie. We Got the Script.

The film, with the working title Pawn Shop, centers on an Antifa siege of a Minneapolis pawn shop amid anti-ICE unrest. On one side: an ICE agent joined by a group of pawn-shop employees and customers. On the other: a rabble of progressive protesters, and eventually a bloodthirsty MS-13 death squad, both intent on rescuing a Hispanic man detained by ICE. It plays out exactly how you’d expect it would.

The film’s first minutes will likely get the most attention. As Pawn Shop opens, two ICE agents in Minneapolis arrest the Latino man, later revealed to be an MS-13 boss. Dimwitted liberal activists film and scuffle with the agents as they try to take their suspect away.

Then the film’s Renée Good stand-in enters, slamming her Subaru into the ICE van. Described with the subtlety of a brick as “MELANIE (40), a fat blue-hair,” the woman, blasting NPR, revs up again and fatally hits ICE agent “Juan” with her car. Then his ICE partner, “Mike,” shoots her in a justifiable killing.

Melanie reacts to the drawn gun with panic...

She MASHES on the gas as she throws the car into reverse, accidentally SLAMMING Juan out of the way. He goes flying into the gutter, bleeding...

And as the car reverses, Mike FIRES TWICE through the

windshield...

The first shot takes the [sic] Melanie in the neck, below her covid

mask. The second in the head, above her covid mask.

Blood SPLATTERS on her PASSENGER’s (40s, female, overweight)

forehead and matching covid mask.

From there, the ICE agent drags his suspect into the pawn shop, with an Antifa mob hot on their heels. The stage is now set for a siege, during which numerous Molotov cocktails will be thrown and shotgun shells will fly. Rest assured that no liberal piety will survive.

Inside the pawn shop, we meet its grizzled Hispanic owner and his son, newly back from college and majoring in Chicano studies. Much to his father’s chagrin, the son is dressed in a Che Guevara shirt and “listening to a POP SONG unfitting for a man.” A pawn-shop security guard quips they’re lucky the boy didn’t get a sex change.

Tucker Carlson #wingnut #pratt #racist #dunning-kruger telegraph.co.uk

Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg has accused Tucker Carlson[…]of “verging on defending” Adolf Hitler[…]
In the show, titled “Tucker Confronts Britain’s Most Pro-War Advocate”, the firebrand broadcaster also appeared to suggest that Britain’s involvement in the war was unnecessary because Hitler had repeatedly claimed that he did not want to fight the UK

Sir Jacob said: “You seem to be putting more trust in Hitler than I would. He said all sorts of things”

Following a brief history lesson about Neville Chamberlain’s promise of “peace for our time” after his meeting with Hitler shortly before Nazi forces invaded Poland, Sir Jacob offered the American a little advice

“I’m very surprised you’re verging on defending Hitler. I think this is not really what you want to be doing”[…]
Carlson replied: “Yeah, I guess I’m just a secret Nazi. I’m actually not a secret Nazi… and hardly a public Nazi”

Sir Jacob, 57, responded, “I’m reassured”, before explaining that, if the UK had not gone to war, “Germany would have invaded us”[…]
Carlson, 57, also suggested that the Second World War was still being “presented” by Britain as a “good thing” despite it having “destroyed” the empire

“It was the classic good versus evil. We did the right thing,” Sir Jacob said, as he tried to explain the motivation behind going to war with a dictator who had invaded his neighbouring countries and exterminated millions of Jews

But Carlson – apparently eager to understand “cause and effect” – wanted to know whether the UK had “benefited” from taking on Hitler

Sir Jacob responded: “To have defeated Hitler? Yes”

Carlson asked: “The UK is a better country now? It is a healthier country?”

Sir Jacob: “In other words, we would all be speaking German”

The US broadcaster then said “Who cares?”, adding that “a lot of people in Britain” do not speak English, so if Germany had won, “at least a European language [would have been] spoken in your country”

leria #pratt #psycho arstechnica.com

What's always bothered me was that the preconcieved stereotypical predator often overlaps the streotypical adult gamer and comic book nerd. Being an adult gamer, it annoys me.

The bigger problem is that they are acting like pedosexuality is 'abnormal'. Frankly, I am a pedosexual and have found that most men, when I ask them, would sleep with an underage girl if they could get away with it and most women would do the same with underage boys, because they are 'easier to control' as one woman told me! The only thing 'abnormal' about pedosexuals is that we are HONEST about our sexuality and see nothing wrong with it, just like homosexuals who used to be called 'abnormal' because they didn't see anything and don't see anything wrong with their sexuality. I have not see ONE child who was not dragged into the social workers office where I used to work by their parents or some other asswipe who had 'moral outrage' thinking that this child was sexually active more than them.... which is what it usually amounts to, jealousy towards the child in question. I also have to say that most of the 'harm' from underage sexual encounters come from the reaction of society to them. There were three girls in my high school class who had been 'sexually abused' by their father, and had NO problems with it until their mothers found out about it and made a big fuss about it, getting their fathers put into prison. Then the girls had problems, because they didn't really want their father put into prison and felt guilt over that. They finally helped get their father out of prison by recanting their testimony, telling what their mothers had threatened them with (killing them, in two cases), and having their mothers put into prison because their mothers were abusing them physically and emotionally. It is just past time to stop with this 'sexual morality' BS and realize that there is no such thing as a sexual act that is 'wrong' unless you are PHYSICALLY FORCING SOMEONE INTO IT OR THREATENING THEM WITH PHYSICALLY FORCING THEM INTO IT. There is no such thing as coercion by keeping something from someone (unless it's food or shelter).

Fritz Berggren #fundie #racist #pratt #dunning-kruger bloodandfaith.com

[From “Japheth (the First Born) and Shem”]

The nut of the matter is in Matthew 21, the Parable of the Two sons. Japheth is the Elder son, who is father to the Europeans. Shem was the second son, contrary to what the Jews would have us believe[…]
This is very clear — it is the Europeans who became faithful in the Vineyard and took the Gospel to the ends of the Earth

This lesson is told again in another way in the succeeding parable — the Parable of the Landowner (Matthew 21:33-46)[…]
Those who call themselves “Jews” would have us believe that Moses and the Patriarch were Jews — nothing could be further from the truth. They never even would have heard that term. Hebrews, yes[…]
I dismiss “Jew” as an overused and confusing term. I rely on Jesus Christ to clear it up: “those that call themselves Jews” are Satan’s synagogue. Do a search son converting to Judaism. Anyone can convert, the Sons of Ham, etc

So what happened to “Israel,” that is the biological offspring of Jacob? The Ten Northern tribes (who were never ever called Jews) when into exile into Assyria, and from there they migrated into Europe — they went to live “among the nations”[…]
But I argue that the sons of Israel went to Europe for this simple reason— Europe converts to Jesus Christ. Europe becomes Christendom, which means the Kingdom of Christ[…]
Also, note that the Gospels and Epistles were written only to the Europeans — it is exclusively in the premier European language — Greek. Corey Mahler has argued ( convincingly) that Jesus Christ, when quoting Scriptures, relied upon the Greek/Septuagint version of the OT prophets. There is no Epistle written to a non-European place — zero[…]
It is also true that the House of God — the original Temple — could not have been built without the Europeans. Hiram was the son of a European man. (1 Kings 7:14) Without that European man, the temple could not have been built

DeedlitCryogenic #pratt #psycho arstechnica.com

The arguements for an "Age of consent" or regulation of sexual relations are put in place to protect the kids (Minors, etc) but what if you have a truely curious under age person who is interested in exploring their sexuality with someone older? People tend to assume that doing so with someone in your age group is for the best (After all, doing so with someone older is a crime!) but from a dispassionate point of view, is it really?

An older, more expirienced person is more likely to use a condom, as well as more likely to use it correctly. They're more likely to use lube and take precautions. Do you honestly think it is better for a gay boy to have his first encounter where there is tearing of the tissues? Likewise for a girl.

I personally agree that an adult should never have sex with a minor they have sway over (Preist, teacher, etc) but I also think the law as it stands does a disservice to "advanced" minors who just want to expiriment with more expirienced people. Or, horror of horrors, actually falls in love with an older person! (I know in highschool I lusted after a certain biology teacher. She wasn't MY teacher, but dizamn was she cute.)

Many of the arguements against are typical reactionary knee-jerk bullshit. How often do you hear "But it is bad for the kids!" or "It warps their little minds!" without anything else to back it up? A thinking man might say "Well, the female's vaginal tract doesn't fully mature until 18-21, making it much more prone to damage before that age" (true, btw) but no, you get idiotic out lashings. I'd even go so far as to say that it is those idiotic outlashings that CAUSE most of the "warping" that society's knee jerk reaction of "That is wrong He touched you in a naughty spot!" does more damage than the act itself.

spideez #fundie #pratt #homophobia #transphobia #biphobia #interphobia tumblr.com

LGBTQ and Christianity: Can they coexist (part 2)

This is coming from a conservative-ish, 19 year old brown dude.

For the Christians who go around gay bashing and telling our LGBT brothers and sisters that they’re irredeemable—SHUT UP!

they just want to be loved and accepted as well. Yes, All sin is sin, but doesn’t mean we’re without our own faults as well.

you think that people will come to the faith like this? Through fear? You’re driving them away.

God loves all, but is He PLEASED with us all? Big difference. That applies to straight people, gay people, trans, theists and atheists alike

think of it this way: you love your friend, but your friend betrays you. You still love that friend, but you’re hurt.

He doesn’t want to let anyone go, but you hateful Christians are hurting people. Are you even trying to get them in the God Squad?

There are three ways to respond to LGBT stuff:

1) keep on sinning! The Bible is wrong!

2) you’re irredeemable. God doesn’t want you. You’re going to hell. See you never, loser!

3) hey friend, I understand you feel this way. I love you and so does God. You’re not irredeemable nor are you a devil. Let me show you a better way to live. It’s one thing to be tempted, another to act.

Just because you have an urge to punch someone doesn’t mean you did. Same thing. Just because you have these thoughts doesn’t mean you automatically are gay, lesbian, bisexual, etc.

Which one are you supposed to pick? 1, 2, or 3?

#pratt