latest

Should Evolutionists Stay Away From Doctors and Medicine? By Their Logic: YES!

I think I shall never forget a YouTube video I watched about ten years ago in which a young man in his twenties discussed a painful ear infection he was battling. To my amazement he went on to lament the decision he made to take antibiotics; a decision made for him by the pain no doubt.

"I believe in evolution and by taking the medicine I am hindering the evolutionary process," he said to the camera.

Upon further investigation I discovered his channel was dedicated to promoting modern atheism and deep time fish-to-men evolution. "Finally," I thought, "an honest atheist."

Any internal infection can kill you. A dental abscess has toxins that can poison your system. Ear infections are a particularly nasty infliction. Yet the evolutionist will ignore the demands of their theory and implement the aggressive use of force against the attempts of nature to kill us at nearly every turn.

And yet I find it equally disturbing whenever we encounter the evolutionist argument against biblical creationism in the form of their favorite red herring: "If you don't believe in evolution then don't take antibiotics or vaccines because, after all, bacteria and viruses evolve (adapt to our attempts to kill them) and medical science must always stay ahead of those evolutionary mutations in order to produce effective vaccines and antibiotics."

Aha!

Therein lies the single greatest piece of evidence the deep time community has that fish became men, that is, that viruses become viruses and bacteria become bacteria. Therefore we Christians mustn't ever use antibiotics or vaccines because we refuse to believe that fish became men based solely on the fact that bacteria become bacteria and viruses become viruses.

[...]

The Bible offers the greatest reason for the need to use antibiotics and vaccines, etc. Because of the fall of humanity the earth is against us.

Genesis 3:17 ¶And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return
Humanity was thrust into the position of requiring the aggressive use of force to keep sickness away because of this event which happened as the result of man's decision to disobey God. That is the creationist view of the world which lines up perfectly with the evidence and need for such aggressive items as antibiotics (which were accidentally discovered) and vaccines (developed by scientists with God-given intellect).

I am not sure what happened to the atheist in the video I mentioned at first. I hope he recovered from his painful infection and I hope he rejected the Darwinian demand that the bacteria kill him and take over the earth. Above all I hope the evolutionists embrace the knowledge of the truth that just because bacteria change into bacteria and viruses change into viruses that does not mean the evolutionist was once a fish.

“NAZI, Nazi, Nazi!”

You hear leftists say this all the time of conservatives who oppose Cultural Marxism and who believe in hierarchy and natural differences.

But Hitler was a revolutionary, not a conservative. The smear is merely projection.

In “Hitler and Nazism was [sic] Leftist,” Lindsay Wheeler writes:

Hitler was a pure leftist. Nationalism has NO bearing on what it means to be Left or Right. French Jacobins were very nationalistic. Hitler said himself that he was the full counterpart of the French Revolution. That makes him a leftist. Both the work of Von Kuehnelt-Leddihn and Eric Voegelin compliment each other in their description of fascism, national socialism, as leftist. The term “leftism” is only another term for Gnosticism. What is gnostic, is leftist; the terms are synonymous.
The only rightist influence upon the National Socialists was the Spartans but this incidence was secondary and an after-effect. The Spartan Way provided the idea of masculinity and a warrior code of honor; this the Nazis did borrow. The Spartans were horrified of democracy and egalitarianism as seen in the case of Kinadon. The Spartans did not provide the intellectual or motive behind what they did, their influence solely rested in the culture the Nazis attempted to create past their revolutionary take-over of the German state.
The revolutionary fervor, the revolutionary fire of the National Socialists came from the French Revolution which passed through the lens of Marx and Hegel which was initiated by the teachings of the kabbala.
Hitler and the Nazis are pure leftists. The historical record is clear, in what they said, and what they [sang.] Hitler stood up at the Beer Hall Putsch, jumped up on a chair, fired a pistol into the air, and said, “Let the Revolution begin”. Revolution is Leftist. No rightist would say that.

The problem is that much of academia is Marxist and/or Liberal. They have an agenda—and they are not beholden to facts nor history. “Hitler is of the Right” is pure Marxist propaganda that has NO basis in fact or history.
I recommend reading Mr. Wheeler’s article in full. He makes excellent points.