Point Refuted A Thousand Times
[From “January 27, 2026: Re-imagining Villains 46”]
Panel 1: Rothschild is speaking to Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin in videoconferencing to say “We need Germany to strike first” and “They must be seen as the aggressor”
Panel 2: FDR appears while a voice-over says “Operation provoke”
Panel 3: FDR flies on his wheelchair to met Hitler
Panel 4: FDR points his finger to Hitler while twice saying “I'm not touching you”
Although different species of dogs have formed because of the genetic diversity God created in the DNA of the dog kind, dogs will only ever produce dogs.
The science of genetics confirms biblical kinds and does not confirm evolutionary beliefs that claim one kind can change into a totally different kind over millions of years.
Yes, God’s revelation to us in the Bible, what I call the history book of the universe, is the key to understanding what happened in the past so we can understand the present.
9:59 PM · Feb 16, 2026 · 6,960 Views
When skeptics and cynics claim that an all-powerful, all-good God would never allow bad things to happen to good people, they are assuming we live in a world where it makes sense to speak of “bad things” and “good people”… a world in which there is such a thing as good and bad, and that humans can know the difference between good and bad.
But what are “bad things” in a world without God, in which death, violence, and natural disasters are just natural parts of an evolutionary process? What are “good people” if human behavior is really no different than animal instinct, within a world in which “survival of the fittest” ultimately determines the future of all living things, and humans have no freedom to act against it?
In other words, a universe without God is not a morally intelligible one.
When we recognize something as “bad,” we are suggesting that whatever happened is not the way it is supposed to be. But if there is no Creator, no design or purpose to the world, then there is no way things ought to be, only how they are. And there is no moral standard to which humans are accountable.
But we do sense the world is a moral place and we have an ability to know when something is bad. If there is no God, that sense is meaningless.
[ on the age of conesnt ]
It should be 12 IMO by then the girl o r bot should be smart enough to make her own choices. Anything like Blackmailing and threatening is considered rape anyways as is having sex with someone with authority over you so unless the person is stupid it's kinda hard to take advantage of someone whos 12 for sex. Proper education is the key we need to stop babying our children and hiding them from everything.
I disagree. While they should be, most people in their early teens and, in some cases, late teens, show a great degree of recklesness so that it could lead to them making a decision, both sudden and that they would later come to regret.
That happens alot with adults to though. I'm 20 and i'm extremely reckless and probably the definition of immaturity. On the other hand I've seen 12 year olds who could be the president of the United States and would do a better job of it then anybody who's ever taken office before. Age doesn't matter as much as you think.
(Infact i think i was a little more mature when i was 12 then i am now)
10 for penetration between female and male
14 for male-male relationships of penetration
I agree with everything except the bolded part but you may have a reasoning for that so i won't go into it.
I think aslong as theres no manipulation occuring you should be able to make your own sex decisions. Problem is most 10 yr olds are incapable of sex and it's difficult to prove if the child was manipulated into having sex with someone. Unfortunately this is only ok in principle since manipulation is bound to occur.
Then again theres not really anything bad that can happen to a 10 year old if they had sex (aside from emotional damage which wouldn't apply with consentual sex)
[From “January 24, 2026: Re-imagining Villains 43”]
Panel 1: two women and a man wearing a concentration camp inmate uniform cap are in a swimming pool, under a legend reading “Meanwhile at Auschwitz…”
Panel 2: three inmates are playing music in an orchestra
Panel 3: three inmates are playing association football and are shouting “GOOOOOAAAAL”
Panel 4: an inmate is in his cell, writing in his diary “|u]Prisoner's Log Another harrowing day of trauma and terror”
Trump did an excellent job. He's no doubt one of our most consequential presidents. Our country had been tanking under Democrat leadership (oxymoron). Trump exposed democrats for what they stand for-- the decline of US, preferring illegal aliens over their own US citizens, DEI, and government that puts US citizens last. No political party has done more damage to the US and its citizens than the Democrat Party.
image
If only the general public could understand what Nazism truly is...
Satanism!
The first thing Hitler did when he invaded France was loot freemason lodges.
He was desperate for the secret knowledge of theosophy, & the 7 mystery schools.
The ideology of aryan supremacy is steeped in mysticism, & esoteric ritual; blood worshiping loons that truly believe they hail from Atlantis.
Hitler was jewish. He hailed from rothschild bloodlines.
Race supremacy in general, and the origins of it are rooted in jewish kabbalism, god's "chosen people," not Nazis.
Nazism is just a new age sect of Satan's synagogue. Ashke-NAZl.
The Holocaust was a racial cleansing funded & carried out by satanists, because they hate God fearing Jews.
They did not want to muddy up their own bloodlines with the likes of them.
The modern perception of nazism is racist white skinheads sporting swastikas.
The real nazis are behind the scenes worshiping lucifer to this day.
The words fascist & nazi have been thrown around so much they've lost all meaning.
It has been drilled into our brains: Nazis = antisemitic white supremacists. End of story. Nothing more to understand. No need to look into the nazis & what they were actually up to 84 years ago.
Bigtree makes two core claims about vaccination, both of which are demonstrably false. The first is one that other anti-vaxxers, including Kennedy, have been making for decades: that the apparent rise in autism cases in the U.S. since the 1990s can be blamed on immunizations, rather than, as is the consensus among experts, largely on broader diagnostic criteria and better surveillance. Bigtree believes that the dozens of studies that have found no evidence of a connection between autism and vaccines are flawed, and that immunizations have never been properly tested for safety. “Why can’t we find a double-blind placebo trial in any of the childhood vaccines?” he asked me. In fact, many early versions of vaccines, like ones for polio and measles, were tested against unvaccinated groups or a placebo. (Bigtree and others in the anti-vaccine movement object to trials that didn’t use a saline-only placebo, or weren’t double-blind.) New vaccines, however, are usually compared with older vaccines because it’s considered unethical, not to mention unwise, to put children at risk of contracting a vaccine-preventable disease.
That brings us to Bigtree’s second, arguably more outrageous claim: Vaccine-preventable illnesses simply aren’t so bad. He wants children, including his own, to get infected so that they can avoid the dangers of vaccination and develop more robust immunity. They will have, as he put it, the “Ferrari of immunity,” while the rest of us will be driving around in Ford Pintos. He told me he would prefer to live in an entirely unvaccinated country, one where the diseases that sickened millions in the first half of the 20th century could spread freely. That’s a frankly ridiculous notion, as I told him later. But Bigtree is committed to it. “I genuinely am upset that your kids are vaccinated, because it’s keeping my kids from getting chickenpox. It’s keeping my kids from getting measles,” he told me. “I believe their health depends on them catching those live viruses.” I asked him if he wanted his kids to catch all of the illnesses against which American children are routinely vaccinated. “Yes,” he said.
I think perhaps we should not use 2000 year old books as the source of our morality maybe?
We already do :)
Most morals come from abrahamic religions, such as dont murder
God’s Word in Genesis tells us that God created distinct categories of animals “according to their kind.” The implication is that each kind produces its own kind and cannot change into a different kind.
We now know that the “kind,” in most instances, is at the family level of classification (from documented evidence showing which can breed with which). So the dog family always produces dogs.
Genesis 1–11 is the foundational history for geology, biology, astronomy, and anthropology so we can understand the present. This history is also the foundation for the rest of the Bible, for all doctrine, for a biblical worldview, and in fact, everything.
The Bible reveals that the earth has undergone a global flood (Genesis 6–9). If such a flood occurred in the past, we would expect to find evidence of it. What would we expect to find? Well, even local floods in the present lay down many feet of layers quickly. So looking at the present can give us some indication of what catastrophic processes can do. In other words, we are using observational science to understand processes.
As I often say, if there really was a worldwide (global) flood, you would expect to find billions of dead things (fossils) buried in rock layers, laid down by water, all over the earth. And that’s exactly what we find in the present.
And the more this has been investigated by creation scientists, the more we understand that these fossil-bearing sedimentary layers over the earth had to be laid down quickly, not slowly.
What the Bible reveals concerning a global flood is the key to understanding the present regarding most of the fossil layers.
9:59 PM · Feb 14, 2026 · 4,390 Views
Friendly notification that due to increased demand for energy for AI, the cult of global warming has been tossed aside…
It makes you think that the ‘existential threat’ of ‘global boiling’ was just another conspiracy theory.
4:45 AM · Feb 11, 2026 · 77.1K Views
With all due respect, I'll not change my entire sexuality just to prove something to a random user of a roleplaying game. We can agree that heterosexual attraction is socially constructed. Is it too far a stretch to say sexuality iself is?
Yes, if you have the willpower, you can choose your sexuality.
Creating Policy Rooted in Reality
The Endangerment Finding was a legal prerequisite used by the Obama and Biden Administrations to regulate GHG emissions. In the 16 years since the Endangerment Finding, many of the predictions and assumptions used to justify the rule did not materialize. Using the same types of models utilized by the previous administrations and climate change zealots, EPA now finds that even if the U.S. were to eliminate all GHG emissions from all vehicles, there would be no material impact on global climate indicators through 2100. Therefore, maintaining GHG emission standards is not necessary for EPA to fulfill its core mission of protecting human health and the environment, but regardless, is not within the authority Congress entrusted to EPA. Today’s action is only related to GHG emissions and does not affect regulations that combat criteria pollutants and air toxics. The Trump EPA’s final rule dismantles the tactics and legal fictions used by the Obama and Biden Administrations to backdoor their ideological agendas on the American people.
I no longer believe official 9/11 story. Two paper passports did not burn and were found on the rubble but it was so hot WTC7 burned down across the street. Nonsense. It's time to look for who gained from 9/11. Our government doesn't work for us. They've been lying whole time.
"TEN - YEARS - since Donald Trump appeared on the political Stage.
And the Trump Derangement Syndrome got not a little bit weaker eversince. The most defeated political Left ever recorded in Human History just can not otherwise than to flail and screech and wallow helplessly in front of our Orange Emperor who lives rent-free in all of their heads all across the West. :D :giggle:
They AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALL - loved him, before he entered Politics.
And when he D~AAAAARED to run for the Republicans in 2016,
suddenly he was named and called things like " LITERALLY HITLER " and other severe Insults and Slurs, until in 2024 a disgusting Soyboy tried to murder him in broad Daylight.
How "democratic" the political Left and their democrat Masters are, right ?TEN - YEARS - since Donald Trump appeared on the political Stage.
I want to deeply thank all US-Americans one more time,
for voting for this glorious Sir Three Times."
There comes a point in the persecution of sexuality when pedophiles are the only sane people left in the world. That time is now. Everyone else has either lost their mind or pretends to go along with the antisex insanity with their public persona so they can have a “respectable” role. I bet you don’t even dare to call out the female sex offender charade with your real name. I don’t play that game. I am not afraid to associate with pedophiles when everyone else has gone insane. I am afraid not to because else you literally have no friends and everything is fake and based on lying to people who would kill you for your real self just to keep up the appearance of normiehood even though they themselves are most likely lying too.
According to the video it has been alleged that the Master of the Universe director came out and said Skeletor is evil due to "toxic masculinity"....
Skeletor much like characters such as the Joker are suppose to be the mirror to the hero... where He-Man is lawful good. Skeletor is chaotic evil. He doesn't care who gets hurt. Who lives who dies. Its about his personal power and desires. Phaeton throughout the war was lawful evil... the destiny of the Neo Sapiens, justice as the Terrans were the architects of their own destruction, peace, order but as he descended into madness he revealed to Livia near the end of the war there was no Neo Sapien Order, no destiny there was only his power.
Its just annoying you can't have villains who are just evil....
Remember there was a Marvel villain named Man-Killer but that character is now problematic because:
Man-Killer's history has largely seen her portrayed her as an offensive stereotype of lesbians and feminists, with her name and attitude towards men, and her appearance, aggression, and temper all playing into harmful caricatures of 'butch' lesbian women.
But you can have toxic masculinity for example even though this is a more comedic:
Things now make sense on why there are so few tv shows that look interesting. They are all DEI checkbox shows now. It's so easy not to subscribe to streaming services, go to the movies, etc. in present day. Hollywood just needs to shut down entirely at this point.
There's a reason shows like Friends, Seinfeld, Frasier, etc were so popular in addition to being pretty well-written. They were obviously for white people - yeah, Hollywood, white people have our own culture guess what - tribalism is a thing and always will be. Keep shrinking your industry with liberal thinking like this, though. It's your funeral, not ours.
Hope people keep moving to the high seas in greater numbers.
Maria Efremova is your average filmmaker, journalist, actress, conspiracy theorist, and anti-gay[…]Her latest work behind and in front of the camera is the movie Good Neighbors[…]Promotional materials describe the film as fun for the whole family[…]Good Neighbors is also, somewhat convolutedly, about the search for a kidnapped 10-year-old boy and his mother’s book publisher[…]The abductions are the work of diabolical Leninists who react poorly to new research that “exposes the cult of Ilyich”[…]
In one especially cringe-worthy scene, “would-be bikers Dima and Olya” (the latter played by Efremova) sit together and reminisce about the greatness of the Russian people. Dima recalls something he read from “an English geologist and traveler” who once praised Russians’ ingrained capacity for “compassionate” colonialism. Olya comments on the “accuracy” of this description and then marvels that such perceptiveness was possible from an Englishman, “a representative of the most deceitful nation on Earth”[…]
Efremova’s character explains that “there are Russians by blood” and “there are Russians in spirit — those who have embraced our customs, culture, and moral values.” Dima agrees, adding that the latter group is called “Russified.” Laughing, he points out that no one but Russians has this infectious, universal appeal — not the British, the French, the Armenians, and especially not the Jews
In another scene, a character named Vera warns her son that Lenin’s Mausoleum functions as a “teraphim,” which she describes as an accursed object made from the dried heads of infants allegedly killed by Jews[…]
Later in the film, someone calls Lenin a “lispy Judas” and accuses him of “destroying the Russian Empire,” “ruining the country,” “carrying out a genocide of Russians,” and “selling Crimea to Jewish tycoons”[…]
After Good Neighbors disappeared from Star Media’s platforms, Efremova published an article titled Why Were the Jews Frightened by the Russian Film ‘Good Neighbors’?
Show Of Force: As I said before, the UN and NATO are practically useless. And because of that, nations around the world are beginning to wonder if the US is as powerful as it boasts to be. Even those within our own borders think we couldn't manage as something as simple as a border skirmish. And for a while, they were right. Under impotent leadership, we allowed practically everyone to get the best of us, which led to the spread of radicalism across the Middle East and into the Free World, Russia to attempt to take over Ukraine, China to prepare to invade Taiwan, and to allow abominations like these be the face of our proud nation:
" Imagine dying for some illegal Aliens who most likely hate you and couldn't care less for you. "
" Imagine going to obstruct Law Enforcement and getting killed for People who openly mock you when they steal your Tax Money and who shouldn't be here in the first place. "
" Imagine having a six years old child you are the mother of and then going out your house and die by trying to kill law enforcement officers only for some illegals who don't care about you. "
And so on - and so on. The Versions of this Line are numerous.
And of Course, the shit-stain-smeared "Comrades" of her are already taking a further Shit on her,
by trying to make her into a FAKE-Martyr and trying not to watch or spread the Clip in which she CLEARLY SPED UP and even hit the left Side of the Body of the ICE Agent who shut her off permanently with a shot to the head.
Hypocrites.
They got her killed by stirring her up,
inciting her to "do" something - against ICE Agents,
agitating her to "do" something - against ICE Agents,
Today’s trans-insanity is perfectly predicted by Andersen in the 1800’s […]
Today we are living in Andersen’s world where the deluded emperor is played out through our precious children and young men and women who are fragile enough to be swindled by the fable that they can actually change their sex. There are many swindlers in this story. They include:
- New online ‘friends’ who, either sadly uncomfortable in their own skin or perverted in sexual desires and salacious in intent, encourage our teens to change perfectly healthy and whole bodies. […]
- Activist teachers with the hubris to think they know better than a loving family […] never letting parents know the distress they see in school but instead helping our children gain access to spaces to see how angry they can make the school board. […]
- Professors who ‘taught’ transgender falseness in their classrooms - encouraging, facilitating, salaciously engaging with fragile students to pursue their own predilection for weirdness claiming it is for the sake of ‘academic research’ or, even worse, ‘science.’ […]
- Politicians who know the transgender world is a made up fable but continue to vote in its favor because, after all, that is what the party says to do. They lie not only to their constituents but also to themselves in thinking that supporting the destruction of families and the permanent damage and possible early death of fragile young people is justified. […]
- LGBTQIA advocates looking to add others to their ranks possibly because they are perverts, possibly because they are not mentally stable themselves, or possibly because they like the power of leading a growing organization. […]
[… surgeons, therapists, affirming family, and WPATH …]
For whatever reason […] there are those of us who have never been entranced by the trans-spell. If this describes you in whatever role you play in this fable, then I believe you, me and the rest of us disagreeable folks are obligated to stand out from the crowd and speak the truth. […]
We are outnumbered by non-whites. They tax us. They expropriate all of our stuff through fraud, through guilt tripping, minority-owned businesses [...] Fewer white people [...] means eventually there's no more wealth. And one day your grandkids wake up, they're a minority in a country that hates them, blames them for all the problems, and when they can't take any more stuff, they're going to enslave us and take our lives.
[...] You feel bad about this lesbian poet and Alex Pretti, the male nurse? You feel sorry for these race traitors that laid down their life in defense of this scheme?
[...] Renee Goode was 38. This guy was 37. What is the excuse? [...] These are full-grown adults.
[...] We are thoroughly in the Trump era. If you don't get it at this point, you're irredeemable. If you're out there throwing yourself in front of ICE to die for these dirt bags, let them. Let them. One less asshole in the world. One less traitor [...]
Being a citizen [...] doesn't just mean you're here to bitch and yell [...] Being a citizen means you're patriotic. It means you're taking care of government efficiency, self governance [...] our productive capacity and [...] security as a nation. [...]
If you're hunting down law enforcement, that's not good citizenship. Wake me up when a real citizen gets killed by law enforcement, then I'll have a problem. [...]
So a lot of people [...] would literally rather see our country be destroyed than tolerate some ugliness. [...] Either we lose the country or we got to get serious. And getting serious means we can't go and virtue signal on Twitter and say, “You know, I don't like the government killing a guy and blah.”
Shut up.
[...] So if you're out there virtue signaling [...] well there's really no moral equivalency there.
Because if the left doesn't start to lose, they're going to kill us. First, they're going to kill our country, then they're going to kill us.
…
It is a zero sum game. We win, they lose. They win, we lose. It's that simple.
(Referring to a racist attack on a Florida Congressman)
Here is the difference between conservatives and liberals. I am a conservative and if this is true that he was punched and racially harassed, I condemn that totally. I do not like him, but he should not have that happen. Now, let's see lefties condemn the assassination attempt on Trump and the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Oh, wait, we've already seen that most of them don't condemn it.
The Ghost of Photography (1850s)
Critics labeled it "mechanical" and "soul-less," yet grieving families cherished it for finally providing a permanent memory of those they lost.
The Ghost of CGI (2000s)
A moving scene is suddenly dismissed as a "digital trick" once the tech is revealed, as if the audience’s real emotions are invalidated by the use of "easy" computer tools.
The Ghost of AI (Today & Future)
People are moved to tears by an AI tribute, only to lash out and call it "slop" to protect their social brand from cognitive dissonance.
If your ideology requires you to bully your own empathy, the problem isn't the tech--it's the ideology.
[From “Black Researcher: MLK, Jr. Was a Marxist Who Rejected Christ; “Pastor” Title a Ruse”]
One reason Martin Luther King, Jr. “is so celebrated today,” stated late left-wing NAACP head Julian Bond in 2010, is “because we celebrate a different kind of man than really existed”
You can say that again, too, researcher Chad O. Jackson might exclaim. In fact, if Jackson is any guide, King’s speech “I Have a Dream” perhaps should’ve been “I Have a Scheme”[…]
Jackson reports that the civil rights icon was a Marxist who renounced Jesus Christ. King only became a pastor[…]because it was the most effective way to peddle his leftist agenda. He had to hide his real views, however, because revealing them would’ve been disqualifying in 1960s America[…]
As for MLK’s transgressions, Jackson has been busy exposing them, such as on a Monday online Q&A and in a November New American interview[…]
While Americans view the man as “a kind of founding father of an America 2.0,” Jackson says, it’s all marketing[…]
If you read his papers, he writes that at the age of 12 he rejected Christ… He said that, and then by the age of 15 he embraced the liberal interpretation of the gospel full-on[…]He really looked up to and admired the so-called “Talented Tenth,” W.E.B. Du Bois, and all these atheist, socialist black liberals in the North who belonged to the NAACP
Ironically, states Jackson, Southern culture produced King via intact family structure, hard work, and faith. Nonetheless, King embraced Marxism, discussing it privately with staff while hiding it publicly[…]
Jackson also reveals that King’s speeches were sometimes ghostwritten by communists (e.g., Bayard Rustin, Stanley Levison, Clarence Jones). And they used familiar patriotic language deceptively to introduce socialism Trojan-horse style
King’s faux-Christian character was perfect for this, too. Communists are anti-religion and would not normally embrace a pastor — only a pastor who was a pretender
(Referring to the Alex Pretti shooting)
4 years ago Democrats reward and comfort federal officers for shooting someone over a broken window and condemn the behavior against federal officers because it happened in their office. 4 years later they embrace citizens who engage in confrontation with federal officers out in the streets. Such a violent instigating party, but then again the party was founded on the need to own people, literally.
Time to wake up and smell your irrelevance, left wing folks. Face the facts, we have a real leader now that actually cares about the USA. Time to change the dialog to one of engagement, not the rhetoric of hate.
Kirk Milhoan, a pediatric cardiologist who became chair of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in December,[…]downplayed established science on vaccines during an interview for the podcast and suggested policy goals, not new research, were the driving force behind changing recommendations[…]
When asked why the committee had revised existing recommendations[…]“Yeah, because we were concerned about mandates, and mandates have really harmed and increased hesitancy”
The current members of the ACIP were handpicked by health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.[…]
In the interview, Milhoan clearly laid out what he sees as the goal of the new ACIP: protecting individual rights over public health
“What we are doing is returning individual autonomy to the first order, not public health, but individual autonomy to the first order”[…]
“[Patients] should be making the decisions on what the risks are of disease[…]” he said[…]
Overall, the spectre of Covid-19 loomed large for Milhoan in the podcast[…]
“People couldn’t go to school, and they couldn’t do this, and they couldn’t do this, to get a vaccine that has really been a large failure,” he said[…]
At the same time, Milhoan cast doubt on the scientific rigor of current public health decision-making. “I don’t like established science,” he said, adding “science is what I observe”[…]
Asked about his thoughts on polio and measles vaccines, Milhoan seemed to question whether both are still necessary[…]
“I think also, as you look at polio, we need to not be afraid to consider that we are in a different time now than we were then. Our sanitation is different, our risk of disease is different, and so those all play into the evaluation of whether this is worthwhile of taking a risk for a vaccine or not,” Milhoan said
“When … we talk about the risk of, let’s say, measles, many of those risks of not getting measles without having a vaccine was in the 1960s. We take care of children much differently now”
With measles transmission in the United States at levels that haven’t been seen in decades, the principal deputy director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Tuesday that he would not view the loss of the country’s measles elimination status as a significant event.
“Not really,” said Ralph Abraham, a physician who formerly served as Louisiana’s surgeon general. “You know, it’s just the cost of doing business, with our borders being somewhat porous [and] global and international travel.”
President Donald Trump on Sunday blamed Renee Nicole Macklin Good and her wife, Becca Good for Wednesday’s fatal shooting of Good by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent, portraying the 37-year-old Minneapolis mother as “very radical,” “very violent,” and “highly disrespectful” toward law enforcement[…]
Speaking aboard Air Force One, Trump defended the actions of ICE agent Jonathan Ross, who shot Good three times during a federal immigration operation in Minneapolis on January 7. In his remarks, the president repeatedly cast Good and her wife as agitators whose conduct, he suggested, made the deadly encounter foreseeable. “At a very minimum, that woman was very, very disrespectful to law enforcement,” Trump said, adding that Good and “her friend were highly disrespectful of law enforcement.” He went on to describe them as “professional agitators” and questioned who might be “paying for it”[…]
There is no evidence to support Trump’s claim that Good and her wife were “professional agitators” or that they had been harassing ICE for hours before the shooting. Her family has said she had just dropped her child off at elementary school when the fatal encounter unfolded
In his comments, Trump repeatedly avoided acknowledging that Good was married to a woman, referring to her wife only as “her friend”
Darwin’s hypothesis that species evolve into other species by small additions over a long time has proven false. Lloyd Pye has shown that After 150 years of Darwinians’ searching, no missing links have been found to show a transition from one species to another. Nor has ANY species here ever evolved into another. Each species does indeed adapt in size and special anatomies to changing environments, but never into another species. This sudden introduction of species, however, in no way validates the silly creationist idea that Earth was created in six days 6, 000 years ago.
<...>
300, 000 years ago, Enki, Chief Scientist of the goldmining expedition of modern Homo Sapiens from the planet Nibiru to Earth went to the Great Rift Valley (southeast Africa) to study Homo Erectus (ancestor of modern Bigfoot), again, a sudden introduction to Earth, as key to adaptations Nibirans would need to create adapted Homo Sapien slaves–us– who could thrive on Earth and labor for the expedition. Erectus reasoned, freed animals from traps. He communicated telepathically rather than speak. Enki and his sister, the expedition’s Chief Medical Officer and Enki’s son Ningishzidda, created us, adding a few Erectus genes, some copper, clay, and Homo Sapien mitochondrial DNA from Ninmah to adapt us for them.
<...>
The early experiments with genetic engineering created many failures and some viable creatures–griffin, cyclop, merpeople, minotar.
Enki and Ningishzidda serviced Erectus women but failed to impregnate them. So Enki and Ningishzidda gathered their own seed, and, in test tubes, fertilized Erectus ova to create zygotes. Then they planted the zygotes in Erectus women. The first babies born of the Erectus women lacked vision, hand dexterity or internal functioning. To beat these defects, Ninmah created the next zygote in a vessel of copper8 and African clay instead of a test tube.
Libs hate Trump for protecting America.
Sonic was always anti-woke and on the right side of history
Drawing shows Sonic the Hedgehog shaking hands with Hitler and saying “You passed animal protection laws? Way past cool!”
[JesuCorSanctissimum]
The religious recognize that 1) evil is real, 2) it doesn't sleep, 3) it hates humanity and wants humanity degraded, controlled and dead.
[rikky18180]
One thing is certain one day everyone is going to learn that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father. No escape from that eventual reality.
In this life for a Christian it’s the worst it’ll ever be, for the non Christian it’s the best it’ll ever be. Let that sink in.
[hai.phan6873]
the atheists worship their intellect. watch how angry they get when their intellect gets belittled. like how they went bonkers when Trump got elected. it's personal
[mac1647]
Believing there is no God requires more faith than believing there is.
[BigRedJedi]
There is no such thing as an "absence of belief" because without belief in "something else," as you put it, you would simply cease to exist. Humans are by dint of what we might call sentience (an awareness of our own existence and the interactions that we, as individuals, have with the outer world, by whatever physical or metaphysical definitions you "believe" in) creatures that depend on belief.
You might not believe in things that you cannot rationalize, observe, or measure, preferring to reject religious approaches to understanding things that science does not currently or cannot explain, but to rely purely upon the rational, observable, and measurable is no less a belief in something than a religious person believes in a spiritual component to existence.
Too many atheists take the simplistic inference that a rejection of the supernatural, divine, or religion absolves them of notions such as belief or faith, but the human experience is dependent upon both belief and faith, as without them we cannot have any meaningful interactions with the outside world or relationships with other beings within that world.
Women don’t want equality. They want special treatment
It is a cold hard fact that despite women claiming they want equal treatment to men, they actually balk at the idea of real equality and actually want special treatment for being a woman. We have affirmative action and DEI helping women get jobs easier and even flat out gives them lower standards for certain job, and not a single woman, even one in a high position, is calling for these policies to be rescinded and for women to compete on an even playing field. Women, especially women politicians, routinely play the woman card and use the sexism accusation to push back on criticisms. Women politicians and activists demanded women be able to join combat roles but when it is brought up that shouldn’t women be subjected to a draft then, they either avoid the subject or defend the idea that only men should be forced to die for their country. They also routinely make everything about women. Hillary Clinton’s “women are the primary victims of war” quote is the prime example. We have women soccer players demand equal pay despite playing less games as another clear example. And the primary thing, you see women on social media constantly complaining that men aren’t “chivalrous” and don’t immediately give up their seat for them on a bus or immediately help them with a heavy box or something and cry about “good men being gone” despite them being the ones that claimed they want equality! The term “women and children” is still constantly used and not only do women not push back against that, but they use that term THEMSELVES. The truth is, women do not want equality. They want special treatment. They actually want to be treated closer to children.
I’m hoping now that Maduro will actually come clean and tell us everything about the machines and how they steal the elections
I mean to be fair if you know you're a pedophile and you conscientiously chose a profession where you have to be around children that probably means you have some untoward intentions or at least are an idiot for purposely sailing into the siren song
I disagree. Don’t adults who are attracted to adults have attractions to coworkers they can’t have never do anything untoward (such as cornering them in side room and assaulting them)? If the pedophile is not inclined to act on their attractions, is able to focus on their job in a professional manner, has appropriate positive feelings for children, wants them nurtured and protected and has strong empathy for them and never does anything inappropriate, why would you characterize that as “sailing into the siren song”?
Because you're presenting something alluring to you that you can never have without violating extreme moral convention
Would you describe it the same way if a straight man worked in an office with women coworkers that he could not have without violating extreme moral convention, i.e. rape?
Most men are sometimes attracted to mostly developed or developed teens. By your logic, shouldn’t men be precluded from teaching high school students? Some women are also attracted to mostly developed or developed teens. Should they be precluded from teaching high school? The vast majority of these people would never pursue a teen, keep their attractions to themselves and perform their jobs professionally. If you trust these people to teach your teenagers why would you have greater concern about someone attracted to younger children who would never pursue a child, keeps the attractions to himself and performs his job professionally?
You are applying a double-standard based on who people are attracted to rather than rationally evaluating actual risk based on a person’s risk factors for criminality such as lack of empathy, poor impulse control, etc. A straight man who is severely lacking in empathy, who has excessively high testosterone and who has poor impulse control is at much higher risk of committing a sexual assault than a pedophile who has strong empathy and normal testosterone and impulse control.
This is such a rare news story for me, when someone who -- regarding Renee Nicole Good whose clumsy driving on the icy roads of Minnesota have tragically led her to her own demise with surrounding ICE agents she intentionally charged towards with her SUV -- let herself be radicalised by the brainwashing of the far-left become a victim. I don't know how else to put it, but it is what it is.
ICE weren't responsible for this; Renee was the victim of radicalisation from the psychopathic American far-left communities which currently opposes ICE's security measures against mass illegal migration. And it's disgusting enough that the mainstream media treats this as another coming of George Floyd which will divide America in two to devastating levels.
If you had to encounter an armed copper, you'd do well to ALWAYS obey his commands unless you end up doing something so serious that the copper in question will very likely be frenzied enough by experience alone to shoot you down. This is just a formal way to say "F--- around and find out".
everybody should be against abortion, it is brutal murder of little child, if abortion is legal murdering adults should be legal too why not both are murder
[From “Russia is not an Aggressor, and Ukraine is not a Victim”]
It is widely accepted that the Ukrainian crisis erupted into a military conflict on February 24, 2022[…]Seeds of the hostilities were planted about thirty years earlier by President Clinton and, later, by George W. Bush, both of whom recklessly pushed for NATO’s eastward expansion
Over the years, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Putin repeatedly warned that Moscow would not tolerate continuing NATO’s “Drang nach Osten”[…]particularly Ukraine’s membership and the subsequent establishment of NATO military bases along the Russian border
On February 25, 2024, The New York Times published an article confirming Moscow’s fears[…]
The newspaper exposed how[…]the CIA has operated a network of twelve bases in Ukraine[…]
Would the United States accept the presence of Russian military bases on its borders?[…]Reagan ordered the invasion of Grenada[…]
Diplomacy was not given a chance because NATO needed to restore its image and validate its continued existence following a 30-year history of failure. The pursuit of “nation-building”[…]has accomplished neither[…]
Since a military alliance cannot exist without a rival, NATO's need for a credible enemy was an existential necessity. The Russian incursion into Ukraine could create the perception of a common threat[…]
For President Biden, who was desperate to escape the Afghanistan disaster, a victorious conflict would be a pivotal moment in his presidency[…]
Never in the realm of international relations was there a state that acted so consistently against its national interests. It put itself in grave danger when it announced its intention to join NATO in 2004, violating the 1997 Treaty on Friendship between Ukraine and the Russian Federation[…]
The preceding facts illustrate a common overriding interest among NATO leadership, its member states, and Ukraine in instigating the invasion[…]Russia was the sole party that attempted to prevent the conflict
Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. displayed his decades of litigation experience during three grueling hours of Senate Finance Committee interrogation on September 4. Kennedy was well prepared to counter the anticipated barrage as he fought off Democrats who clutched at slender straws in a failed effort to discredit him.
Democrat senators gathered like Cincinnati street hoodlums to thrash Kennedy for his alleged transgressions in firing the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and CDC director Susan Monarez. Yet the soft-shelled bullies got more than they anticipated, as the veteran attorney and longtime children’s health advocate took their baloney on the chin and countered repeatedly with pointed jabs of his own.
At the root of the controversy is the cult-like worship of mRNA vaccines by Democrats, pitted against the “real science” that shows that the vaunted technology didn’t work as advertised, that masks and social distancing were conjured fictions, that school closings were counterproductive, and that vaccine injuries including pericarditis and myocarditis were covered up by the regulatory agencies charged with protecting Americans’ health. Kennedy’s would-be assailants were repeatedly rebuffed, often visibly shaken that the victim they thought was an easy target responded more like an annoyed lion.
The whole kerfuffle is revealing not of Kennedy’s failures, but of the dubious motives of faux-indignant Democrats.
Benny Johnson, a MAGA slop artist with close ties to the Trump administration, claimed on Sunday that “Nicolás Maduro might be Trump's final revenge for the election theft of 2020”
“Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems were the voting systems being used at this time [in 2020] and in these states and all around the world,” he said. “They are Venezuelan by design and by systems, storage facilities and through their actual technology. These systems, I have on extremely good authority, can and do rig elections around the world”
Johnson claimed to have a source who says that Maduro “told him directly that he has direct hard evidence of the election of 2020 being rigged, that he knows exactly how it was done, that they had a hand in it, but it wasn't really Venezuela running the op. It was probably more likely China”[…]
In the fall of 2025 — as the Trump administration escalated its pressure on Maduro, surged U.S. Navy ships into the Caribbean Sea, and destroyed boats it alleged were carrying drugs while murdering those onboard — the purported Venezuela connection took on new life
“There’s never been as necessary a war since the Civil War, that we go down and take care of Venezuela,” [Patrick] Byrne told host Emerald Robinson in an October 7, 2025, appearance on her show on Lindell’s LindellTV network. “It’s more important than World War I or World War II to the viability of the United States. The U.S. was overthrown, and Venezuela’s technology was part of it”[…]
Benny Johnson is already telling his viewers that Maduro will “sing like a canary” about his purported accomplices and “how they stole the election”
“Who will he give up?” Johnson asked Sunday. “Soros? China? Left-wing NGOs? Left-wing billionaires?”
“He'll sing,” Johnson added ominously. “He'll tell them everything. They got his wife. This is why they took him alive. I learned all this from my conversation, and it really checks out, quite frankly. It really checks out”
Faith was no less present at the Ellipse, where a speaker named Ben Pollock repeatedly held a Bible aloft to cheers. In an interview with RNS, Pollock said two of his children had served time in prison for their actions at the Capitol five years ago and that he had been “preaching in prisons for years.” He told RNS, “There was that inner small voice that called us to the Capitol that day. It was about truth, and it’s a truth that’ll set you free.”
The Bible that Pollock carried was the “God Bless the USA Bible,” a version that includes the Declaration of Independence and other U.S. historical documents along with the Christian Scriptures. The edition, inspired by country singer Lee Greenwood’s song of the same name, was endorsed by Trump when it was published in 2024, and the president has made money off its sale.
“Donald Trump promoted this because at one point in America, we all could say a prayer together — the Lord’s Prayer,” Pollock said. “It would be in unison. It didn’t matter what church you were belonging to. You knew that Lord’s Prayer out of this Bible. It did deliver us from evil, and it still will deliver us from evil if we’ll pray it.
[Trump] then went on to espouse that Democrats love “open borders,” “men in women’s sports,” and “transgender for everyone.” He yelled his latter comment and went on to share a string of lies.
“Bring your kids in, we’re gonna change the sex of your child,” he said, “In some cases, like in Minnesota, they don’t even tell the parents… The kid comes back, they keep the kid, they operate on the kid, they don’t tell the parents,” he said, adding, quite ironically, “It’s not believable.”
That’s because it’s not true. Nowhere in America do children receive any kind of gender-affirming surgery – or any surgery for that matter – without parental involvement.
White House staff updated the so-called “Presidential Walk of Fame” Wednesday by adding lengthy descriptions of each former president, in rhetoric that aligns with President Donald Trump’s – such as calling former President Joe Biden “the worst President in American History”[…]
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “The plaques are eloquently written descriptions of each President and the legacy they left behind. As a student of history, many were written directly by the President himself”
“Sleepy Joe was, by far, the worst President in American History,” the plaque underneath Biden’s portrait, which is an autopen as opposed to his official portrait, reads. “Taking office as a result of the most corrupt Election ever seen in the United States”
As part of Obama’s description, the White House wrote: “As President, he passed the highly ineffective ‘Unaffordable’ Care Act, resulting in his party losing control of both Houses of Congress, and the Election of the largest House Republican majority since 1946”
For former President Bill Clinton, the White House attributed his legislative successes to “Republicans in Congress,” and boasted that Trump terminated the North American Free Trade Agreement, the trade deal struck under Clinton. The White House also included a line about how Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 presidential election in Bill Clinton’s description
However, some former presidents, more aligned with Trump on policies, such as Reagan, receive more of a doting description
For Reagan, the White House wrote: “Known as ‘The Great Communicator,’ he was re-elected in a landslide in 1984, and left office with high approval... He was a fan of President Donald J. Trump long before President Trump’s Historic run for the White House. Likewise, President Trump was a fan of his!”[…]
The White House seemingly gave props to former President Gerald Ford in his description for issuing a “brave Pardon to Richard Nixon”
[From “Minnesota, Land Of Ten Thousand Mistakes”]
A civil war in Somalia produced a lot of refugees in the 1990s. Naturally they had to come to the United States since their country was broken. The Somalis arrived mostly in Minnesota—they did a poor job of assimilating and proceeded to break things there. The Somalis couldn’t go to neighboring countries such as Ethiopia because they are despised by Ethiopians. The Somalis are not highly regarded in Africa, but Minnesota is a ‘welcoming and progressive’ state who welcomed them because, you know, diversity
Not all Somalis are bad, but a great many are violent. Some have scammed our country and sent their ill-gotten gains back to Somalia to fund terrorists. Governor Walz allowed this to happen. Maybe he even encouraged it. Maybe he’s deeply involved
Communist China wants our country weakened and Walz is their man. He visited China around 30 times. Even The New York Times tossed Walz under the bus for his failure to do anything about the corruption in his state[…]
Another Somali scam artist is Ilhan Omar, who married her brother to make sure she could come here. Now, somehow, she’s worth nearly $30 million even though she denied (lied) that she was a millionaire. She’s absolutely crazy about Somalia and Minnesotans have been so obliging that they changed their state flag to resemble the one in Somalia. Maybe that state should change their name to “New Somalia.” Trump should send Omar packing back to the country she loves so much
At almost every turn, Trump has proven correct. For liberals, it's as if they don't remember the nightmarishly haphazard previous four years. Compared to the Trump stability, including use of tariffs, the previous administration was a festering wound.
Some Russian Girls Can Marry At 14. That's Good News!
1. Brutally Honest Rather Than Shameless
Immigration seems to be a hot topic these days here in the United States. People are constantly complaining about open borders and rightfully so. However, what gets much less attention is whether adult men have the right to bring foreign wives into the country if those foreign wives are younger than 18 years old.
..
Some of you may be asking the million-dollar question, which is, "If you're an adult man and you're traveling to the Russian Federation to find a wife, why not marry a woman in her twenties?" I'm not discouraging American men from doing so. However, keep in mind that a majority of Russian women are getting married right out of high school. Therefore, an American man is not going to have as many 20-something-year-old single women to choose from in that country as teenage girls.
A 20-something-year-old American man will have no problem finding himself the 14- or 15-year-old love of his life in the former Soviet Union. All he has to do is attend a Russian beauty pageant, and there will be contestants as young as 13 years old with bodies that would make even the hottest 29-year-old woman green with envy.
If we American men want to travel to foreign lands to find ourselves a teenage bride, it's our business. Call it a caveman fantasy if you must, but it's a heck of a lot better than being married to some self-absorbed, youth-obsessed hag.
…
Never mind all of those horror stories that Fraidy Reiss and Jeanne Smoot spread all over the nation about older husbands who beat on their underage wives. These women are scraping the bottom of the barrel for these kinds of stories, when there are likely more true stories about girls of middle-school or high-school age getting married to someone older and living happily ever after.
Femi-Nazis like Fraidy Reiss and Jeanne Smoot have gone as far as falsifying data to support their baseless arguments that teenage marriages are somehow all exploitative and wrong. They've misused the press and the media to showcase their agenda.
