James Wilson

Rev. Douglas Wilson, Rev. Joel Webbon, Ben Zeisloft and Vincent James #fundie #racist #forced-birth rightwingwatch.org

Christian nationalists and right-wing fascists have never been shy about their agenda, but lately many of them have become increasingly bold in laying out the future they envision for this country[…]
During a recent podcast[…]pastor Douglas Wilson declared that, “In the republic I envision, Hindus would not be able to hold public office”[…]
Pastor Joel Webbon used his own podcast to explain what “true revival” in America would look like: “It would look like millions of people being deported. It would look like mothers getting death row for murdering their children” through abortion[…]
During a recent appearance on “The Byce Eddy Show,”[…]activist Ben Zeisloft proclaimed that “our role as Christians who are involved in the political process is not to compromise with them, but to make them do what we want”[…]
Christian nationalist fascist Vincent James used his program to proclaim that “the only way to start the return to moral order in the country is by force. … People have to start to realize that faith in God [and] Christian understanding of morality [has to be] the foundation. And this is not gonna be done by choice”

Various Commenters #wingnut #conspiracy msn.com

(Joe B)
@Bob King
Obama's leadership put us into a recession and the country saw the lowest growth in history.  Unemployment was high.  His spending on stimulus projects only benefited China.  He failed miserably on foreign policy, domestic policy, crime, trade and education.  Biden's presidency is just an extension of Obama's failed policies and it's driving us back into the same place.  
Oh and Bush's recession was mainly a result of Clinton's policies.  Clinton's community reinvestment act was the root cause of the housing crisis and bank collapses of 2008.  His Free Trade agreements with China and the WTO is what drove the offshoring of manufacturing leading to the unemployment crisis.

(Delta Kilo Tango)
@Bob King
Not even close. Trump was one of the best and the welfare of the country when he was in proves it. BTW: Independent.

(drew defilippis)
@Bob King
Obama strengthened the Deep state by politicizing the FBI and DOJ , he also divided America

(Scott Hightower)
I think Biden is actually worse than Carter, can't believe I am saying it as that is scary. But remember that every policy change Biden has done has directly affected our economy and he started on day one. Sad part is that any person with common sense knew what the outcome was going to be.

(R. D.)
All 3 are demoKLANcRATS. What a "coincidence" 'eh?
Don't forget openly racist pro-slavery and pro-Klan demoKLANcRAT POTUS Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren who founded the demoKLANcRAT party, racist demoKLANcRAT James Polk, racist demoKLANcRAT Andrew Johnson, racist demoKLANcRAT Woodrow Wilson, racist demoKLANcRAT Harry Truman, and openly racist demoKLANcRAT POTUS FDR ...just to name a few.

kamuroshiryu #transphobia #pratt #dunning-kruger deviantart.com

Ever since J.K. Rowling gave International Women's Day a very low viewpoint that earned her the high rise of scorn from Labour MPs like Annaliese Dobbs, the BAFTAs is now next for becoming pants-browning woke especially for the fact that Emma Watson has left me rather puzzled with her current shifts in her own brand of feminism, but if she thinks she can speak highly against J.K., then she really needs to sort out her priorities. But what is great about this elite circus is that Ricky Gervais took the right time to even demolish the fake actors' guild at this year's BAFTAs award after they waffled a lot about the Ukraine War, gender politics, Emma Watson's aforementioned disapproval of J.K. Rowling's objective opinion on politicised pandering towards women and Rebel Wilson butchering a James Bond story.

Ethan Mast, Kourtney Aumen #fundie kmbc.com

The parents of a 4-year-old Benton County, Missouri, girl allegedly killed by neighbors to remove a “demon” now face charges.

Mary S. Mast, 29, and James A. Mast, 28, both of Lincoln, Missouri, were charged Thursday with felony child endangerment resulting in death and are jailed without bond, according to Benton County Sheriff Eric Knox said.

[…]

The Benton County Sheriff’s Office said the 4-year-old girl was found dead at the family home on Dec. 20. Knox said she had been severely beaten and dunked in an icy pond as part of what appeared to be a “religious-type episode.”

Ethan Mast, 35, and Kourtney Aumen, 21, are charged with second-degree murder and other offenses. Both are jailed without bond and don’t yet have attorneys, according to court records.

[…]

Deputies were called around 1 a.m. Dec. 20 to a rural home near the town of Cole Camp, Missouri, and found the 4-year-old wrapped in a blanket on a bedroom floor. A probable cause statement from Sgt. Chris Wilson said the girl was already dead and had “severe purple bruising” over her body, along with ruptured blisters.

Knox said the girl's parents also had been beaten along with a 2-year-old child. An infant son of the couple was apparently unharmed. Both were placed in protective custody, Knox said.

[…]

James Mast told investigators that the beatings had occurred over several days and that he and his wife observed them but were told they would be beaten or shot if they tried to intervene.

Still, Wilson asked James Mast "how he could let people do this to his family and he stated they were told (his wife) had a ‘demon’ inside her and her children would end up just like her if it was not taken care of,” Wilson wrote in the probable cause statement.

Ethan Mast told investigators that on Dec. 19, he and Aumen used a leather belt to beat the girl, the statement said. She was then taken to a pond behind the home where she was “dunked" in the water on a day when high temperatures were in the 40s. […] Knox said evidence indicated she was beaten to death.

Jake Wilson #fundie researchgate.net

The digression to the ark really tempts me to take apart, piece by piece, some of “science’s” sophistries, but it’s probably better to open a separate thread, something like: “Why is there no evidence for a) the Big Bang b) the geological periods c) molecule-to-man evolution?” – because it’s all nonsense.

As for the ark, I have spent quite a few hours there. It has a bow, a stern, and is 300 cubits or 157 metres long, i.e. the measurements given to Noah by God. As the terminology seemed to have been somewhat blurred in this thread: by the non-descript title “God” I am referring to YHVH – not to Jedi, King Kong or similar. A qualified expert would probably not recognize it as a ship, though it looks like a ship and sits – funny enough – on the Ararat Mountains, as stated in the Bible.

The fossil record shows anyway that there was a world-wide flood, but the ark is additional proof for this.

In 1987, Ataturk University confirmed the boat-shaped object to be Noah’s Ark, and the discovery was subsequently announced by the Turkish government. The “scientifically-minded” may not be interested, but here are some photos I took during my visit (plus attached a resistivity scan FYI):

https://www.hanotzrim.com/noahs-ark.php

Scientists who are motivated or driven by what they want or hope to be true are very hesitant to accept any evidence that would appear to be contrary to their cherished beliefs. Instead, an endless mixture of false assertions, false premises, and false conclusions plus ridicule, all clad in fancy scientific language – that is the over and over repeated defence strategy.

It is not my concern as such, but it is regrettable and a clear symptom of degenerate humanity, but fortunately, it will terminate soon.

PS: James, – teaching children “the best scientific model” as fact is not education, it is re-education.

Jake Wilson #fundie researchgate.net

James/Kathleen/Eugene (et al.),It is commonly known that, unless more hypothetical factors are added, the predictions made from the big bang model stand in utter contradiction of what we observe.

The crucial point, however, is not what happened after the bang, but what happened prior to it. Leaving Steady State aside, one can choose between: a) “everything came from nothing” (effect without a cause)b) “everything came from something” Because option a) is idiotic, it was utterly rejected by Fred Hoyle. Making fun of it, he called it sarcastically the “big bang”. Today, it is obviously idiotic not to accept the idiotic option, viz. the miraculous effect without a cause.

I assume this is all part of “the beauty of science”, the evolving ‘facts’, etc. That the current consensus is aligned with the views presented in this thread is perfectly fine. Personally, I prefer option b), and if that merits the designation of “religious fanatic”, then this is fine too. What is not fine is to teach children this miraculous illogical model without giving them the alternative version. And to clear the misunderstanding, – I don’t think the big bang theory is deplorable, it’s merely stupid.

Bombarding children and young teenagers with the stereotype, “13.8 billion years ago blablaba”, without even giving option b), – that is a deplorable crime which rather merits getting a millstone around the neck and to be drowned. I certainly don’t expect my insights to reform the education system anymore, but at least I’d like to air my views.

In response to further contributions: Uniformitarianism is not science but the result of disallowing a Divine Foot in the door. It’s merely the consequence of believing in the above magic, i.e. in an effect without a cause. As for evolution, it can be nipped in the bud right away: life doesn’t arise spontaneously from non-living chemicals, and if someone nevertheless wants to believe in the impossible, then I admire their faith, but I don’t share it and deem it irrelevant for our discussion. If it helps people to believe that they are unaccountable accidents, then I will be the last person to stand in their way.

I don’t know what the “antichrist reference” has to do with our subject, but it seems that the faculty of Atatürk University plus the Turkish government is viewed as a bunch of idiots or anti-science fanatics (this is what I am forced to conclude).

It is a pitiful tactic of recommending science, but I do appreciate the scoffing and also the vehement opposition if a find supports Scripture. Both of these practices prove the reliability of the biblical text. Considering all the redundant prattle, I wouldn’t mind moving on now and look at some (potential :-) autoptic archaeological evidence: Mt. Sinai, the encampment area, the altar of the golden calf, etc. – that kind of thing… any interest? No?

PS: James, – fossilized timber specimen found at the ark site was tested and showed 0.7019% organic carbon (plus 13.04% iron).

Graham Seibert #racist #sexist #homophobia #wingnut amren.com

Marry Your Own Kind

We can marry whomever we want. Anti-miscegenation laws are gone, and social norms have been relaxed. “Empowered” women, sexual liberation, and lesbianism mean there are fewer white women available or desirable as wives. White men are looking elsewhere, especially to Asian women.

There is a bitter backlash from white women who resent this, but nobody wants to marry a bitter woman. The “manosphere” is full of complaints about white women, so why should a white man marry one? I was married for eight years to an Asian and for 25 years to a half Asian (three children), and am now ten years into a successful marriage (two kids) with a white woman. Marrying your own kind — after choosing carefully — makes the most sense.

I have read widely on evolution. Survival of the fittest means differentiation and competition. The strategies that work best win out.

Sarah Blaffer Hrdy writes that human reproductive strategy was simply better than that of our ape ancestors. Nonreproducing females — sisters, aunts, grandmothers — help raise children. Human males do the same, at least more so than male apes. Human mothers can therefore bear children every two years or so as opposed to every five or six for apes. We out-bred apes, and with homo sapiens’ unique ability to speak and cooperate, other ape-men as well.

Real diversity

In Race, Evolution and Behavior Philippe Rushton applied r/K strategy to races. We evolved different reproductive strategies because we occupy different niches. Northeast Asians — fighting a harsh but predictable climate — became the most K selected. Africans, in a benign but unpredictable environment because of disease and predators, remained the most r selected.

Families reflect these differences. Asian “tiger moms” invest a great deal of effort in each child. Every member of a multigenerational Asian family recognizes that he must work towards bringing up the next generation. More than other people, Asians fulfill their roles out of a sense of duty. One of the attractions of an Asian wife is that sense of duty. Asian wives tend to feel obligated to feed their husbands, whether they like them or not, and to take care of children.

On the other hand, libido is weaker among the K-selected Asians. The newspapers carry stories of young Japanese and Chinese of both sexes who have no interest in sex. They are more likely to be faithful, but perhaps less likely to be satisfying partners. These are population averages; there is far more variation within a race than between the races.

Africans on average have measurably higher levels of sex hormones, mature earlier, and tend to have higher sex drives compared to Asians, but they don’t feel the Asian sense of obligation to spouses and children.

Caucasians are in between, although a bit more toward the Asian end of the scale. Stanford’s Luigi Cavalli Sforza has devised a scheme of measuring the genetic distance between any two populations. The genetic distances between the major races are much greater than those between any two European nations. Since our temperaments are under considerable genetic control, we are more likely to understand a fellow European at a deep level. That has certainly been my experience.

True love

Some things do not fall on the r/K continuum. We white folks came to believe in love and romance.

James Q. Wilson, writing in The Marriage Problem, attributed the notion of marrying for love to the medieval English practice of a young man moving out of the parental house to start his own homestead. When he was established and could afford it, he went out on his own to seek a wife among the local girls. He would choose on the basis of personal attraction, without much input from parents or anybody else.

Kevin MacDonald, writing in Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition, pushes the practice back further. He links it to the individualism of the hunter gatherers of preagricultural Europe. Each individual rose on his own merits in the “Männerbund,” or brotherhood of men. These were egalitarian societies in which individual merit mattered more than family.

Dr. MacDonald proposes that monogamy was the standard in these societies. Individuals living close to nature don’t have enough resources to support multiple wives, and sexual rivalries would have destroyed the cohesion of the Männerbund. Both parties chose carefully because they were marrying for life. They wanted someone who was skillful at manly or womanly tasks, but also pleasant to be with. The Catholic Church, a uniquely Western institution, promoted monogamous marriage as a sacred bond, based on love, dedicated to raising children — Augustine’s fides, proles et sacramentum.

That sets Europe in contrast to the rest of the world. In richer societies elsewhere, families chose mates for their offspring to keep wealth within the family. They arranged marriages for the competitive advantage of the tribe. In some places, such as among the Indians of the Brazilian rain forest, chiefs simply assigned marriage partners. All members of a tribe were so closely related by blood that it didn’t make much difference genetically.

The upshot is that romantic love is a Western notion, and we white people evolved the mental equipment to make it work. We believe in love. While the Japanese have made a fetish out of sending Valentine’s Day cards, and the Africans certainly celebrate sex, we lead in our belief in love. Moreover, Western societies were unique in the status afforded to women. We evolved to treat them as true partners, not just status symbols or incubators of our children.

Belief in love is not an unmixed blessing. Westerners are uniquely disappointed when we don’t find it. An Asian man will remain with the wife of his youth and simply take concubines if he can afford them. Sex in African societies is unconstrained. Native Americans likewise consider fidelity to the tribe to be more important than fidelity to their partner.

We Westerners have put ourselves in a bind. Western women have grown to expect that they can have it all: a family and the true love that society celebrates and that their ancestors knew, along with freedom and a career. Sometimes it all fits, often not.

Before the 1950s, sex was seen as part of marriage, not an end in itself. People were expected to fulfill their obligations to each other in the marriage, especially with regard to earning money, keeping house, raising children, and paying bills. Satisfaction came from fulfilling obligations to family and society, not sex.

Hugh Hefner started Playboy magazine in 1953, and in the same decade, Simone de Beauvoir published The Second Sex. The 1960s saw Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique, along with the pill, the sexual revolution, the antiwar counterculture, and drugs. The emphasis turned to self-gratification, with sex becoming a plaything more than an instrument of procreation as part of a larger, social commitment. Sex became burdened with expectations it could never fulfill, leading to generations of unfulfilled men and women. This is how we arrived at today’s situation.

Children

The children of a mixed marriage are . . . mixed. My one-fourth Japanese children called themselves “mixers” — neither Asian nor white. However, when pressed, because being white is so monumentally out-of-favor, they lean toward their Japanese quarter.

If the genetic distance between the parents is great enough, the parents will be genetically closer to members of their own race than to their own children — hard as that may be to believe.

I had hoped my children would inherit their mother’s Asian work ethic and conscientiousness and my drive and curiosity. I was disappointed. Is this common? Anecdotally, I do not see as many successful mixed-race Asian Americans as one would expect.

Only one of my mixed-race children inherited the sense of romantic love I got from my parents. She is also inclined to be critical of men who don’t have an Asian level of conscientiousness. I believe that she and, indeed, all three of them would be more comfortable if they were not mixed.

There is unlikely to be a statistical study of the characteristics of Asian-Caucasian “mixers.” It is hard to imagine a more politically charged research thesis. Moreover, a rigorous statistical study would be very hard to construct. And there is the question of which Asians? Profs. Lynn and Vanhanen find that the average intelligence in Asian nations varies by as much as 20 points.

Children of any mixed marriage find themselves in the same position as my children. Are they white or Asian? Or, like George Zimmerman, white or Latino? There may never be statistical validation of this point, but it is common sense to stick with your own kind and to have children who don’t have to decide who they are.

What’s the solution?

To make ourselves attractive as marriage partners, we white people should learn once again to act responsibly. We should learn to respect each another. We should learn that true satisfaction comes from family. But what can you do if you want marriage and children when there are so few well-suited partners?

Look in the right places. Find religion. People who attend church are more likely to believe in the Christian tradition of monogamous marriage and family. Take on a self-improvement program: People who attend Toastmasters or take night courses are more likely to be just as conscientious in their romantic relationships. The people you will meet at Dale Carnegie or dance lessons are more likely to be outgoing and interested in forming stable relationships.

If you are a woman, you should attend American Renaissance conferences, where you will find many like-minded men. You will find younger people in identitarian groups. Don’t just attend — take leadership roles. Learn to speak publicly. If a person’s first impression is looking up at you on a podium, he might continue looking up at you.

You can expect the commenters on articles at American Renaissance to be on your wavelength. There are ways to protect your privacy — burner email addresses, SIM cards and Skype numbers — and still let people know how to reach you. The odds of finding a soulmate among people interested in the future of our people are certainly higher than on Tinder or eHarmony.

Millennial YouTube personalities such as Brittany Sellner (formerly Brittany Pettibone) and Blonde in the Belly of the Beast have an attractive message. Join the commenters on their YouTube pages or Mrs. Sellner’s book and make contact with them.

After my second divorce, I was too old to do these things. As a graduate student on an American campus from 2003 to 2006, I didn’t find anyone who would have interested me even if I had been young enough to be in the running. Two poignant books, “Sexual Utopia In Power” by Roger Devlin and “No Campus For White Men” by Scott Greer pretty well sum up my experience.

The logical choice for me was to look elsewhere. While there are substantial white populations in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, and southern Brazil, the largest number by far are in Europe. Women in just about every less-developed or recently-developed country, whatever their race, are less affected by cultural disease than women in the United States and Western Europe. Moreover, an American income is also more attractive to them.

I consider the Visegrad countries — Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, and the Baltics to be recently developed. Although their standards of living approach those of Western Europe, the people remain traditional. I am continually encouraged by their resistance to the dictates from the European Union that they take immigrants. They are standing their ground, asserting that they are Christian countries and want to stay that way. The former members of the Soviet Union — Russia itself, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine — might properly be considered underdeveloped. Average monthly salaries are less than $1,000. Though Western culture is making inroads, these peoples are still better marriage prospects.

Although most people think going abroad means American men looking for foreign brides, it works the other way. The men in these countries are more traditional. They tend to be more courtly, more inclined to observe the traditional courtesies such as opening doors. They can fix things. They expect to marry, the major constraint being whether they can afford it. At the same time, the characteristics now called “toxic masculinity” haven’t been beaten out of them. A white woman looking for a real man — with both the advantages and disadvantages — could do worse than Eastern Europe.

University has always been an ideal stage of life at which to meet a partner. All of Europe has a tradition of relatively inexpensive education. Here in Ukraine, education is ridiculously cheap — the most expensive schooling is about $5,000 per year for medical school. Moreover, at some universities, a lot of the courses are offered in English. A parent interested in the prospects of grandparenthood and the well-being of his wallet could do worse than to recommend that his children study overseas. Although it will probably take longer if the language of instruction is not English, the knowledge of a foreign language will be a lifelong asset, the experience with a foreign culture invaluable, and the possibility of a delightful (and philogenitive) partner is valuable.

Racial diversity brings differences that are hard to overcome in any context, differences that are on constant display in the United States and Western Europe. Marriage is the most intimate possible human relationship. The difference between men and women is already profound, and bridging it is challenge enough for any couple. As I have learned from costly experience, it does not make sense to burden a relationship with the added differences of miscegenation. Marry your own kind.

Kajm #wingnut deviantart.com

(Submitter note: talking about progressives somehow being behind Jim Crowe laws… back when the Democrats were the Conservative party of the nation)

I didn't know that.

They never learn.

We had "race conscious laws" once upon a time thanks to #Democrats. They were called Jim Crow. #DemDebates

— Keith James (@BlackMagic63) February 8, 2020

There it is.

conservatives were behind jim crow

— David Taft Terry (@DTaftTerry) February 8, 2020

Oh, honey, no.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. People like Democrat Senator Hugo Black, who filibustered anti-lynching legislation were behind Jim Crow. FDR, the ultimate progressive (along w Woodrow KKK Wilson) appointed Hugo Black to SCOTUS for life because he was "a good New-Dealer" aka "progressive"

— American Elephant™ (@TheElephantsKid) February 9, 2020

Yikes.

twitchy.com/samj-3930/2020/02/…

Ok, so a progressive judge was ONE of the people behind Jim Crowe. It might pay to look up a few more names...

Oh Hey! It gets better! https://www.deviantart.com/users/outgoing?https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/supreme-court-justice-was-kkk-member-180962254/

Ooooh, another progressive! Woodrow Wilson! https://www.deviantart.com/users/outgoing?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era


Woodrow Wilson was a Democrat elected from New Jersey, but he was born and raised in the South, and was the first Southern-born president of the post-Civil War period. He appointed Southerners to his Cabinet. Some quickly began to press for segregated workplaces, although the city of Washington, D.C., and federal offices had been integrated since after the Civil War. In 1913, for instance, Secretary of the Treasury William Gibbs McAdoo – an appointee of the President – was heard to express his opinion of black and white women working together in one government office: "I feel sure that this must go against the grain of the white women. Is there any reason why the white women should not have only white women working across from them on the machines?"[29]

The Wilson administration introduced segregation in federal offices, despite much protest from African-American leaders and white progressive groups in the north and midwest.[30] He appointed segregationist Southern politicians because of his own firm belief that racial segregation was in the best interest of black and European Americans alike

------

Don't forget, Wilson liked the idea of a United Nations.

More later, must get back to chores!

dreamfires #quack #conspiracy deviantart.com

So here we are again. More dead, and the usual suspects trotting out their screams for gun control. As my previous postings explained, gun control would solve nothing.
So let us talk more about what would do almost everything.
We must again repeat: psychotropic drugs must be banned. Why? Read this:

(Natural News) The following is a republishing of an important article written by Dan Roberts from AmmoLand.com. It reveals the real truth about mass shootings that bureaucrats and lawmakers are choosing to sweep under the rug: psychiatric drugs. If you want to know the real reason why mass shootings are taking place, this is the “inconvenient truth” the media won’t cover.

Here’s the full article by Dan Roberts:(Ammoland.com) Nearly every mass shooting incident in the last twenty years, and multiple other instances of suicide and isolated shootings all share one thing in common, and it’s not the weapons used.

The overwhelming evidence points to the signal largest common factor in all of these incidents is the fact that all of the perpetrators were either actively taking powerful psychotropic drugs or had been at some point in the immediate past before they committed their crimes.

Multiple credible scientific studies going back more than a decade, as well as internal documents from certain pharmaceutical companies that suppressed the information show that SSRI drugs ( Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors ) have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior. One need only Google relevant key words or phrases to see for themselves. www.ssristories.com is one popular site that has documented over 4500 ” Mainstream Media ” reported cases from around the World of aberrant or violent behavior by those taking these powerful drugs.

The following list of mass shooting perpetrators and the drugs they were taking or had been taking shortly before their horrific actions was compiled and published to Facebook by John Noveske, founder and owner of Noveske Rifleworks just days before he was mysteriously killed in a single car accident. Is there a link between Noveske’s death and his “outting” of information numerous disparate parties would prefer to suppress, for a variety of reasons?

I leave that to the individual readers to decide. But there is most certainly a documented history of people who “knew too much” or were considered a “threat” dying under extraordinarily suspicious circumstances.

From Katherine Smith, a Tennessee DMV worker who was somehow involved with several 9/11 hijackers obtaining Tennessee Drivers Licenses, and was later found burned to death in her car, to Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Gary Webb, who exposed a CIA Operation in the 80’s that resulted in the flooding of LA Streets with crack cocaine and was later found dead from two gunshot wounds to the head, but was officially ruled as a “suicide”, to Frank Olson, a senior research micro biologist who was working on the CIA’s mind control research program MKULTRA.

After Olson expressed his desire to leave the program, he was with a CIA agent in a New York hotel room, and is alleged to have committed “suicide” by throwing himself off the tenth floor balcony. In 1994, Olson’s sons were successful in their efforts to have their fathers body exhumed and re examined in a second autopsy by James Starrs, Professor of Law and Forensic science at the National Law Center at George Washington University. Starr’s team concluded that the blunt force trauma to the head and injury to the chest had not occurred during the fall but most likely in the room before the fall. The evidence was called “rankly and starkly suggestive of homicide.” Based on his findings, in 1996 the Manhattan District Attorney opened a homicide investigation into Olson’s death, but was unable to find enough evidence to bring charges.

As I said, I leave it to the individual readers to make up their own minds if Noveske suffered a similar fate. On to the list of mass shooters and the stark link to psychotropic drugs.

• Eric Harris age 17 (first on Zoloft then Luvox) and Dylan Klebold aged 18 (Columbine school shooting in Littleton, Colorado), killed 12 students and 1 teacher, and wounded 23 others, before killing themselves. Klebold’s medical records have never been made available to the public.

• Jeff Weise, age 16, had been prescribed 60 mg/day of Prozac (three times the average starting dose for adults!) when he shot his grandfather, his grandfather’s girlfriend and many fellow students at Red Lake, Minnesota. He then shot himself. 10 dead, 12 wounded.

• Cory Baadsgaard, age 16, Wahluke (Washington state) High School, was on Paxil (which caused him to have hallucinations) when he took a rifle to his high school and held 23 classmates hostage. He has no memory of the event.

• Chris Fetters, age 13, killed his favorite aunt while taking Prozac.

• Christopher Pittman, age 12, murdered both his grandparents while taking Zoloft.

• Mathew Miller, age 13, hung himself in his bedroom closet after taking Zoloft for 6 days.

• Kip Kinkel, age 15, (on Prozac and Ritalin) shot his parents while they slept then went to school and opened fire killing 2 classmates and injuring 22 shortly after beginning Prozac treatment.

• Luke Woodham, age 16 (Prozac) killed his mother and then killed two students, wounding six others.

• A boy in Pocatello, ID (Zoloft) in 1998 had a Zoloft-induced seizure that caused an armed stand off at his school.

• Michael Carneal (Ritalin), age 14, opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed, five others were wounded..

• A young man in Huntsville, Alabama (Ritalin) went psychotic chopping up his parents with an ax and also killing one sibling and almost murdering another.

• Andrew Golden, age 11, (Ritalin) and Mitchell Johnson, aged 14, (Ritalin) shot 15 people, killing four students, one teacher, and wounding 10 others.

• TJ Solomon, age 15, (Ritalin) high school student in Conyers, Georgia opened fire on and wounded six of his class mates.

• Rod Mathews, age 14, (Ritalin) beat a classmate to death with a bat.

• James Wilson, age 19, (various psychiatric drugs) from Breenwood, South Carolina, took a .22 caliber revolver into an elementary school killing two young girls, and wounding seven other children and two teachers.

• Elizabeth Bush, age 13, (Paxil) was responsible for a school shooting in Pennsylvania

• Jason Hoffman (Effexor and Celexa) – school shooting in El Cajon, California

• Jarred Viktor, age 15, (Paxil), after five days on Paxil he stabbed his grandmother 61 times.

• Chris Shanahan, age 15 (Paxil) in Rigby, ID who out of the blue killed a woman.

• Jeff Franklin (Prozac and Ritalin), Huntsville, AL, killed his parents as they came home from work using a sledge hammer, hatchet, butcher knife and mechanic’s file, then attacked his younger brothers and sister.

• Neal Furrow (Prozac) in LA Jewish school shooting reported to have been court-ordered to be on Prozac along with several other medications.

• Kevin Rider, age 14, was withdrawing from Prozac when he died from a gunshot wound to his head. Initially it was ruled a suicide, but two years later, the investigation into his death was opened as a possible homicide. The prime suspect, also age 14, had been taking Zoloft and other SSRI antidepressants.

• Alex Kim, age 13, hung himself shortly after his Lexapro prescription had been doubled.

• Diane Routhier was prescribed Welbutrin for gallstone problems. Six days later, after suffering many adverse effects of the drug, she shot herself.

• Billy Willkomm, an accomplished wrestler and a University of Florida student, was prescribed Prozac at the age of 17. His family found him dead of suicide – hanging from a tall ladder at the family’s Gulf Shore Boulevard home in July 2002.

• Kara Jaye Anne Fuller-Otter, age 12, was on Paxil when she hung herself from a hook in her closet. Kara’s parents said “…. the damn doctor wouldn’t take her off it and I asked him to when we went in on the second visit. I told him I thought she was having some sort of reaction to Paxil…”)

• Gareth Christian, Vancouver, age 18, was on Paxil when he committed suicide in 2002, (Gareth’s father could not accept his son’s death and killed himself.)

• Julie Woodward, age 17, was on Zoloft when she hung herself in her family’s detached garage.

• Matthew Miller was 13 when he saw a psychiatrist because he was having difficulty at school. The psychiatrist gave him samples of Zoloft. Seven days later his mother found him dead, hanging by a belt from a laundry hook in his closet.

• Kurt Danysh, age 18, and on Prozac, killed his father with a shotgun. He is now behind prison bars, and writes letters, trying to warn the world that SSRI drugs can kill.

• Woody __, age 37, committed suicide while in his 5th week of taking Zoloft. Shortly before his death his physician suggested doubling the dose of the drug. He had seen his physician only for insomnia. He had never been depressed, nor did he have any history of any mental illness symptoms.

• A boy from Houston, age 10, shot and killed his father after his Prozac dosage was increased.

• Hammad Memon, age 15, shot and killed a fellow middle school student. He had been diagnosed with ADHD and depression and was taking Zoloft and “other drugs for the conditions.”

• Matti Saari, a 22-year-old culinary student, shot and killed 9 students and a teacher, and wounded another student, before killing himself. Saari was taking an SSRI and a benzodiazapine.

• Steven Kazmierczak, age 27, shot and killed five people and wounded 21 others before killing himself in a Northern Illinois University auditorium. According to his girlfriend, he had recently been taking Prozac, Xanax and Ambien. Toxicology results showed that he still had trace amounts of Xanax in his system.

• Finnish gunman Pekka-Eric Auvinen, age 18, had been taking antidepressants before he killed eight people and wounded a dozen more at Jokela High School – then he committed suicide.

• Asa Coon from Cleveland, age 14, shot and wounded four before taking his own life. Court records show Coon was on Trazodone.

• Jon Romano, age 16, on medication for depression, fired a shotgun at a teacher in his New York high school.

Missing from list… 3 of 4 known to have taken these same meds….

• What drugs was Jared Lee Loughner on, age 21…… killed 6 people and injuring 14 others in Tuscon, Az?

• What drugs was James Eagan Holmes on, age 24….. killed 12 people and injuring 59 others in Aurora Colorado?

• What drugs was Jacob Tyler Roberts on, age 22, killed 2 injured 1, Clackamas Or?

• What drugs was Adam Peter Lanza on, age 20, Killed 26 and wounded 2 in Newtown Ct?

Those focusing on further firearms bans or magazine restrictions are clearly focusing on the wrong issue and asking the wrong questions, either as a deliberate attempt to hide these links, or out of complete and utter ignorance.

Don’t let them! Force our elected “representatives” and the media to cast a harsh spotlight on this issue. Don’t stop hounding them until they do.

About Dan Roberts
Dan Roberts is a grassroots supporter of gun rights that has chosen AmmoLand Shooting Sports News as the perfect outlet for his frank, ‘Jersey Attitude’ filled articles on Guns and Gun Owner Rights. As a resident of the oppressive state of New Jersey he is well placed to be able to discuss the abuses of government against our inalienable rights to keep and bear arms as he writes from deep behind NJ’s Anti-Gun iron curtain. Read more from Dan Roberts or email him at DRoberts@ammoland.com You can also find him on Facebook: www.facebook.com/dan.roberts.1…

Original article at:
www.ammoland.com/2013/04/every…

[moderator note: these links were broken in the original DeviantArt post as well]

Is that clear enough? Everyone got it?
Great. So now let us move on to what else you can do.
Parents:
You need to understand pH. This is the acid alkaline balance in a human being. Most say there is no way to know who is at risk to become a shooter. That is garbage. pH can tell you exactly who is at risk. Our whole being is reflected in our pH--nutrition, detox, exercise, character--everything. Too many wrong decisions and a kid gets a urinary pH in the 5s. The lower in the 5s you go, the more risk. Some can get as low as 4.5. Somewhere in this range, if nothing is done, the warning signs increase in a common triad of events: 1) cruelty to animals 2) setting fires and 3) bedwetting. The bedwetting is synonymous with very low pH from adrenal exhaustion--the result of chronic fear and anger. There. Low pH: That is your warning sign. Fail to address it then at the least the kid will be sick. At worst you get shootings.
So what do you do? Check the urinary and salivary pH of your kid upon waking with cheap pH paper. If it is off, fix it. If you do not know how to fix it, read the book Natural Healing Self Empowerment sold at my website polytope.www1.50megs.com
A great key step is to have your kids drink neutral or alkaline water. But note that most science textbooks and companies lie. First, it is said water has a neutral pH of 7. That is a lie. Go get some distilled water and test it. Distilled water is pure water. It is not neutral, it is acidic. Do not accept any bottled water labeled alkaline without testing it. Most selling such water are also liars.
Schools.
Test your school water. Provide your kids only with verified alkaline water. Their grades will be better. They will be healthier. And they will show improved behavior. You need no one else to fix this problem. Fix yourself, and show others how to do it.
How many more have to die?

George Rojas #racist #wingnut americanthinker.com

How the Turks Handle 'Diversity'

The stateless nation of Kurdistan doesn’t have a lot to offer the United States, it’s true. But President Recip Tayyip Erdoğan’s ingenious bit of population engineering should offer this stark lesson to America’s open-borders ‘woke’ class: the fallout from ethnic diversity, no matter where in the world, is always pulverizing, intractable, and inevitable.

On October 5th, when Erdoğan announced his launch of Operation Peace Spring in northeast Syria, he stated that the plan sought to “neutralize terror threats against Turkey” and “prevent the creation of a terror corridor across our southern border, and to bring peace to the area.” He was out to neutralize the Syrian branch of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK): a terrorist group in Turkey, say authorities, and one that’s killed tens of thousands there in its multi-decades-long struggle to establish a greater Kurdistan ethno-state -- 12 of the Middle East’s 30 million ethnic Kurds currently live in Turkey. Just like the Greek and Armenian minorities in Turkey in the early 19th century (before they were expelled and genocided, respectively), the Kurds are viewed as a constant source of distrust by the Turkish government and few forms of their ethnic expression are tolerated.

The October 9th military operations aimed at clearing out the Kurds from northeast Syria have since settled into a truce and Turkish troops now control a 75-mile strip of territory in the region with another section previously controlled by Syrian Kurds now being patrolled by Turkish and Russian soldiers together.

Operation Peace Spring also entails returning some of the 3.5 million Syrian occupants who have been bottled up in Turkey since 2015 when Erdoğan cut a deal with Angela Merkel and the EU to halt migrants travelling through the country en route to richer places like Germany, Sweden, and Italy. The Turkish government has announced plans to spend nearly $30 billion on Syrian resettlement efforts in the region, including the building of homes and agricultural infrastructure. Currently, Syrian migrants in Turkey live mostly in tent and container cities. One hundred thousand have been returned to the region so far.

This resettlement part of Erdoğan’s plan has been wildly popular among the Turkish people. From the outset of the Syrian influx, Turks have complained about strains on local labor markets, public services, and housing capacity. Due to these, as well as cultural problems, polls show nearly three-quarters of Turks want a return to the pre-influx status quo. And largely because of this promise to return, a massive 85 percent of the Turkish population is supportive of Erdoğan’s plan.

Yet another motivation behind Operation Peace Spring, says Turkish affairs expert Ryan Gingeras in the New York Times, is that a return of Syrians into Kurdish-held Syria would create “a living, breathing demographic barrier to Kurdish autonomy.” This motivation, which the International Crisis Group’s Dareen Khalifa has also noted, would further dent Kurdish aspirations in northeast Syria by diluting their numbers and creating ethnic factions in the region.

In sum, Erdoğan’s three-pronged plan is essentially about softening inter-ethnic tension in his own country (i.e. removing Syrian occupants, dulling the Kurdish autonomy movement), while creating it where it would benefit his own power base (i.e. building up tensions in northeast Syria). Each are facets of the same age-old, cross-cultural problem of how to deal with interethnic conflict. But, while no doubt extreme, Erdoğan’s plan is not at all without precedent. Nor, on a fundamental level, is it completely far-flung from America’s own efforts in maintaining multicultural stability; efforts which, by the way, will likely increase in future. Probably dramatically so.

Conflict between ethnic groups, of course, is as old as the dirt they fight over. From the ancient story of Arminius, a German citizen of Rome who led his fellow tribesmen against the Roman army, to the ethnic breakup of the Russian, Hapsburg, and, of course, Ottoman empires, to today’s paralyzing distrust between Afghanistan’s Pashtun, Hazara, Tajiks and Uzbeks; concern over dual loyalties and ethnic civil war appear cross-culturally and across time.

So does divorce between groups locked in shotgun marriages. Just taking examples your average boomer might have watched on TV, there’s the Singaporean Chinese leaving the Malaya federation, the Czechs splitting from the Slovaks, the breakup of the Balkans, and the partitioning of Sudan. While some were bloody and some weren’t, all were predictable and for the best. Putting it in academic terms, UC Berkley sociologist Donald Horowitz once noted, “[t]he desire to extirpate diversity seems greatest in states that are among the most heterogeneous.”

Also frightfully common is the kind of ‘demographic engineering’ Erdoğan’s engaged in. Whole books have been written about the subject, covering examples of blunt population restructuring, such as China and the Soviets’ respective funneling of Han Chinese and ethnic Russians into Tibet and Estonia; to more subtle endeavors, like the UK Labor Party’s late nineties immigration increases aimed at diluting the Tory vote. If building up ethnic tensions can somehow benefit a government’s power base, it seems, ethnic tensions will be built up.

Take the Ottoman “Millet” system (roughly meaning ethnicity or nationality) that reigned up until the founding of modern Turkey. In it, minorities in the sprawling heterogeneous state were granted a limited level of autonomy and tolerance, but with an overarching Sunni establishment always keeping a firm grip on things. As part of a divide-and-conquer strategy, the Ottomans would often settle violently opposed nationalities next to each other and allow them to work only in livelihoods that depended on their hated neighbors.

Although a passing grade in junior high history and an issue or two of Foreign Policy should suffice in making the average person cognizant of the pitfalls of ethnic diversity, there’s also the area of evolutionary biology which, although some of us refuse to agree with it, we should probably defer to for safety’s sake.

Evolutionary biologists and their forerunners have long found that our differentiation and skepticism of outgroups is an ingrained tendency that inhabits us all. Building on the work of people like J.B.S. Haldane and W.D. Hamilton, Yale’s William James McGuire concluded way back in the late 1960s that “…it appears possible for specific attitudes of hostility to be transmitted genetically in such a way that hostility is directed towards strangers of one’s own species to a greater extent than toward familiars of one’s own species or toward members of other species.” In the 1970s, Harvard biologist Edward O. Wilson noted that this same transmission takes place in the animal kingdom as well. In other words, as its inherent, outgroup suspicion may have to be dealt with, not through platitudes and public service announcements, but by way of cold, hard acceptance and sober policy prescriptions.

As of late, the West in general is doing a pretty poor job at this. Take our utter lack of circumspection when it comes to our rapid move from having relatively homogenous states to quarreling heterogeneous ones. Perhaps, identity-based strife is now so commonplace in Western daily life, we’re too anaesthetized, tired, or cowed to contemplate what an acceleration of tensions could really look like. How far will conflict management in the U.S. have to go as ethnic heterogeneity barrels ahead? Thankfully, the other side’s beginning to show us.

Both the New York Times and the Washington Post recently published op-eds that, while focused solely on the extreme ends of white identity politics, essentially argued that policing tribal impulses in the U.S. and keeping a lid on intergroup provocations means we will have to narrow what’s considered acceptable public discourse and speech freedoms generally. By way of more de facto and even legal censorship, all things which spark multicultural disharmony (racial satire, “derogatory” jokes, etc.) will have to go.

Surely, this will also mean ramping up what we already do to keep the expanding non-white populace at bay i.e. revising our shared national history and heroes; multiculturalizing the workplace and social sphere; allocating jobs, school admissions, and government contracts for non-whites, etc. How far will these and other existing measures have to be increased? Will brand new, more drastic measures become necessary? Will an Erdoğanesque reorientation of things have to appear in West? We shall see.

Steven R. #fundie fstdt.com

Sexuality is of the devil, and people need to realize that any form of indulgence and glorification will result in the fall of civilization as we know it. Sodomy is not okay, and neither is doing what the wicked former deacon James Wilson did. Only good men of integrity these days have the courage to clean house and eradicate people who are perverted freaks out of the public sphere. Nowadays it’s called the “LGBT community” instead of what they really are: child predators!!!!! No more porn, no more premarital sex, no more sodomy, and absolutely no more transsexualism!!!!

David J. Stewart #fundie jesus-is-savior.com

Then there's Brian Wilson's song, God Only Knows. Although the song didn't become popular at the time, it has become an icon of the Beach Boys. The song is extremely popular nowadays and is cherished worldwide. The only problem is that Brian Wilson isn't sure there is a God. When asked by interviewer, Andrew Schwartz, "Are you thinking about God these days?", Wilson replied:

"I think about God, yes, and I wonder if there is a God. And if there is a God, will God please help me through my hard trips." —SOURCE, INTERVIEW: Backtalk with Brian Wilson

I find it utterly disturbing that any individual could sing about a God he's not sure exists. To make matters even more freakish, Wilson states...

"...I've gone beyond him (Phil Spector) now. I'm doing the spiritual sound, a white spiritual sound. Religious music ... That's the whole movement. That's where I'm going. It's going to scare a lot of people ... That's where I'm going and it's going to scare a lot of people when I get there."

—Brian Wilson quoted in Jules Siegel's article, Goodbye Surfing Hello God!

Here's a guy who wants to produce religious music; but isn't sure if God exists. Interestingly, Brian Wilson in the quote above speaks of a "white spiritual sound"; which is a deviation from his "dark stuff" mentioned in the quote below. But, ironically, Wilson is still unsure of God's existence. I want you to notice carefully here that you can sing witchcraft or religious music, and still be totally void and ignorant of God and His Word. Wilson hasn't found God, he's found religion; and religion is the most godless thing on the planet. You need Jesus Christ Mr. Wilson; not religion.

"We were doing witchcraft, trying to make witchcraft music." —Brian Wilson quoted in Nick Kent's The Dark Stuff (pg.27.)

Everyone reading this article needs to be warned about the evil music of Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys. Obviously, Wilson is NOT a born again Christian; but, rather, is a child of Satan (Ephesians 2:2). It is frightening when people, who don't even know if God exists, write "spiritual" music for the masses to listen to. Brian Wilson is of the world, and the world receives their own (John 15:19). Wilson is the enemy of God (James 4:4).

Steven R. #fundie simplychristian.referata.com

Sermon 4: Cleaning House

By Bro. Steven R.

"Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican."- Matthew 18:15-17

Sometimes, someone who claims to have been won over to Christ and saved is not really saved. They sometimes get into positions of authority in the church, and then the come out and you can see they are someone other than who they purport to be. This has happened in every church ever, and goes all the way back to Judas Iscariot in the Christian faith.

A while ago, "Bro." James Wilson, a former Deacon of New Testament Baptist Church, shocked the church by "coming out" as an effeminate sodomite. The very kind he claimed to denounce through the power of Christ! It turns out he was a wolf in sheep's clothing! He is injecting fake hormones into his body and wearing makeup and perfume! IT'S WICKED! SAY AMEN IN THE HOUSE OF THE LIVING GOD!

Closets used to be for storing clothes, not something strange people came out of! That's why in this age of "gay liberation" and former reality stars who had affairs with porn stars claiming to be right with God because of "eating a little cracker and drinking a little cup of wine" (outright popery from the Presbyterian Church if I have ever heard it!!!) it is important to CLEAN HOUSE and make sure that your church is safe and godly for people to be able to be edified in God's Word! We can't let the homos take over our churches like the Episcopagans and the Evangopagan Lutherans and the Unitarians Considering Christ and the United Sodomist "Church" and the Southern Baptists have let happen! NO HOMOS WILL EVER BE ALLOWED IN ANY CHURCH I AM INVOLVED WITH! THE BIBLE SAYS THAT THEY ARE LIKE DOGS AND EAT DUNG! NO KID NEEDS TO BE AROUND THIS DOWNRIGHT PUTRID FILTHINESS! CLEAN OUT YOUR CHURCH, LEST YOU SEE ALL THE WICKED ABUSERS OF FLESH COME OUT LIKE THE CHILD ABUSING SODOMITES IN THE VATICAN!

James A. Wilson #transphobia #homophobia #fundie fstdt.com

Men are simply born men! Women simply are born women! Ask any non-Darwinist geneticist and you tell me what the truth is! If Transgenderism is valid, why do transgendered "women" commit crimes at similar rates to men? Because they are MEN! Yet I'm the one with the third grade understanding of science.

Homosexuality is unnatural because children who are raised in homosexual households are more likely to be in poverty, incarcerated, depressed, and also more likely to become homosexuals. This is verified information

Taylor Swift's "reputation" album and corresponding music videos have shown off her drunkenness, vindictiveness, as well as her lack of modesty in attire. Quite sad, really.

Next, I am not a schizophrenic person, and you libs have obviously never heard of reusing content with permission. I simply reused the content from Pastor Grimes' sermons to bring the light of the Gospel of Christ to the unsaved heathens residing there until I was removed by hyper-PC liberals who decided that the word "tranny" was comparable to the n-word. When were trannies enslaved again in the United States? Please enlighten me. Trannies and tranny enablers are insulting the African American community by spewing nonsense like that.

James A, Wilson #fundie ntbc.referata.com

Sermon 29: Goodbye

By James A. Wilson

I would like to take a minute to thank everyone who supported New Testament Baptist Church, and I sincerely hope we have had an impact on your life. However, this ministry must come to a close because I have a confession to make:

I am spiritually sick. I need to get cured before I can hope to be a competent minister of the Gospel of Christ. Due to my ever-present and severe gender confusion, I announce that I will seek the assistance of a minister in my area through reparative therapy. I cannot deny my grave and wicked sin anymore.

Young Christians, I would like to let you know that there is hope at the end of the tunnel. You don't have to be content in living in your sins and going on and on about living and doing that which is wicked.

Mark 4:30-34 " And he said, Whereunto shall we liken the kingdom of God? or with what comparison shall we compare it? It is like a grain of mustard seed, which, when it is sown in the earth, is less than all the seeds that be in the earth: But when it is sown, it groweth up, and becometh greater than all herbs, and shooteth out great branches; so that the fowls of the air may lodge under the shadow of it. And with many such parables spake he the word unto them, as they were able to hear it. But without a parable spake he not unto them: and when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples."

May my faith be as that mustard seed, and may I come back from reparative therapy a strong and real man, as God has tasked me to be. Then, I may return to NTBC.

Farewell- James

James A. Wilson #fundie ntbc.referata.com

Sermon 28: Reviving Masculinity
By Bro. James A. Wilson
"Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, [act] like men, be strong. Let all your things be done with charity."-1 Corinthians 16:13-14
"He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?"-Micah 6:8
"For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels. Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord. For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God."- 1 Corinthians 11:8-12
Real men are in short supply in the world today. Justin Bieber, Bruce Jenner, Bradley Manning, Michael Jackson, Daniel Roem, Joel Osteen, and other men have become proud in their chronic effeminacy. Liberals are supporting radical feminism, and men who reject masculinity. Some men just act effeminate, but others cross-dress and try to pretend to be women. God clearly saith in Genesis 1:27 that there is only male and female, and this is determined in the womb.
God has a special role for the women, but this isn't the subject of today's sermon.
Masculinity is NOT sitting on your duff and drinking beer and watching sports while eating Wingsteet wings and a meat lovers pizza. Nor is it about fast cars, or whatever else our culture says! TRUE, GODLY, CLASSIC masculinity is that of being a warrior for Christ, saving the unsaved, defending the home and homeland, and living a life of righteousness without sin pleasing Almighty God above!
In the Episcopal, Lutheran, Methodist, Roman Catholic, Southern Baptist and other fake "churches" there are effeminate fake men who love their pristinely trimmed beards, moisturized skin, avocado toast, high voiced "contemporary Christian music," Starbucks lattes, and skinny jeans! SUCH IS VILE SEWAGE AND AN ABOMINATION UNTO THE LORD!!!!! THERE IS NO PLACE FOR SUCH DEGENERACY IN THE HOUSE OF GOD!!!!!! SYNAGOGUES OF SATAN ALLOW MEN TO BE SO THOROUGHLY EFFEMINATE!
Plus, most "pastors" these days shy away from HARD PREACHING, biblical language, the KJV, and other things found in NTBC! It is only a few places today where people can get true Biblical realities preached by those who are REAL MEN! Not effeminate sissies or women like in other "churches" these days.
To conclude, we need to allow men to be throughly masculine in our churches and homes, and stop drugging boys with Ritalin to make them behave more like girls! Let boys know it is okay to be a boy, because real men are in a severe shortage in today's society! I saw a man with painted nails and a Taylor Swift phone case going into a synagogue of Satan! The Bible is clear that Christ spits out the lukewarm! Throw out all of the effeminacy and simply let MEN BE MEN AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

James A. Wilson #fundie ntbc.referata.com

Conserva"pedia is a liberal wiki founded by RINO and Papist Andrew "Andy" Schlafly. Schlafly founded the wiki as a response to what he saw as liberal bias in Wikipedia, but has had no problem with liberal biases of his own.

"Conserva"pedia is known for removing true conservatives from their site if they espouse views that are consistent with the wishy-washy RINO views of Schlafly. The site promotes neocon nonsense, and they believe in further expanding the bloated military budget. They, therefore promote the liberal homosexual agenda through their ringing endorsements for adulterer Donald Trump despite Trump having paid off a porn star regarding an affair they had.

"Conserva"pedia also promotes false religions, such as the Roman Catholic "Church", Protestantism, Eastern Orthodoxy, and Judaism. They are also soft on Islam and are apologists for the liberal former "president" George W. Bush and soft on Barry Soetoro of Kenya.

While claiming to believe Jesus Christ is Lord, they believe in the fake Jesus the papists and "papist-lite" Protestants believe, i.e. the long haired hippie depiction of Jesus.

Mike King #racist tomatobubble.com

A museum exhibit set to open this weekend at the National Museum of American Jewish History in Philadelphia and later this year at the American Jewish Historical Society in New York will focus on three historic events and their impact on Jews (evidently, no else really matters). The exhibit titled, “1917: How One Year Changed the World,” will feature America’s entry into World War I, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and the Balfour Declaration.

Though much of what this particular Slimes article tells of these three events is indeed accurate, the deception lies in what is omitted about this sad centennial. Let's dive in and see what we mean.

Slimes: The war and the revolution resulted in strict limits on immigration to the United States, reflecting a fear among Americans that unrest in Europe would spread to their country. The restrictions were not overtly aimed at Jews, but because the quotas from countries with high Jewish populations were tightened, fewer Jews were able to settle in the United States.

The Omission: The restrictions were aimed, in large part, at stopping the influx of Anarchists and Communists who had been causing problems in America since the 1880's. And it just so happened (surprise, surprise) that many of these subversive characters were of a certain ethnic group (cough cough).

Slimes: After the revolution, when the Bolsheviks came to power, and the xenophobia coalesced together and had the power to influence, that fear accelerated.

The Omission: The Bolshevik Revolution was a Jewish affair. With the exception of front man Lenin (1/4 jew who spoke Yiddish), a review of the roster of Russia's leading Bolshevik killers reads like the guest list for a Russian-Jewish Bar Mitzvah -- Trotsky (Bronstein), Sverdlov, Dzerzhinsky, Litvinov (Wallach), Radek (Sobelsohn), Kamenev (Rosenfeld), Uritsky and many, many more.

The Bolshevik Revolution and subsequent bloodbath were Jewish --- no "ifs", no "ands" and no "buts" about it!

Slimes: As the United States was entering the war, there were concerns among Jews over the persecution of those still in Russia and Eastern Europe.

The Omission: Apart from the fact that the "persecution" TM of the chosenites was greatly exaggerated, it is important to note that the Communist movements of the other nations of Eastern Europe were also led by the usual suspects -- Bela Kun in Hungary; Max Goldstein in Romania: Rosa Luxembourg in Germany et al. It is understandable that the good Christian people of these nations might come to justifiably resent the Jewish-led drive for a Bolshevik Europe.

Slimes: Not all Jewish immigrants viewed the United States as a safe haven. A handful of documents highlight the little-known story of Boris Reinstein, who came from Russia and made a career as a druggist in Buffalo. His 1917 application for a passport is on display, as is his 1923 renunciation of his United States citizenship. Mr. Reinstein was a true believer in the Bolshevik Revolution and the Soviet ideology and left his wife, Anna, to return to Russia, where he worked in the Library of the Marx, Lenin and Engels Institute.

Comment: An interesting and useful little truth gem which validates our points of argument. Thanks Slimes!

Slimes: The Balfour Declaration, meanwhile, expressed Britain’s support for a Jewish home in Palestine.

For Dr. Perelman and Rachel Lithgow, executive director of the American Jewish Historical Society, one gratifying coup was the loan of two draft versions of the Balfour Declaration from the financier Martin Franklin...This was the text that was forwarded to Lord Balfour and was used as the basis of the Balfour Declaration. Arthur James Balfour, for whom the declaration is named, was Britain’s foreign secretary. The final declaration, in the form of a letter dated Nov. 2, 1917, was sent to one of Britain’s most distinguished Jewish citizens, Baron Lionel Walter Rothschild.

Ultimately, it said, in part: “His Majesty’s government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object.” The document also added that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.”

Omission: Solid history, but the direct linkage between the Balfour Declaration and America's entry into World War I is oh-so-conveniently "forgotten" about.

125,000 American "doughboys" died a horrible death for Zionism and Globalism/Bolshevism.

A wealthy New Yorker named Benjamin Freedman, a former aide to Bernard Baruch, later split with his fellow Jewish millionaires and "blew the whistle" on The Balfour Declaration and Zionist treachery in general. Freedman, from a 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel in Washington:

"Let me show what happened while we were all asleep. .....
World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. ... There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened?

Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply facing her -- and after that, starvation.

At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Now Germany -- not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.”

Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously! They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe what I'm saying is at all possible -- the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.”

The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.”

In other words, they made this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”

Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain -- that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine -- should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.

However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German -- totally pro-German -- because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.

The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers -- the German-Jews -- Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: “As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!” But they poured money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. And they were no good.

Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." And that did happen. That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room.

Now the war -- World War One -- in which the United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there -- we were railroaded into it -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened?

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.” Because they didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that."

That fateful history-altering year of 1917 was very bad for humanity. But it was very "good for the Jews" -- as the popular inside-the-Tribe saying goes (here) -- which is why the Jewish museums are commemorating its 100th anniversary. And that, dear reader, is some serious REAL history!

Jewish defector Benjamin Freedman spent a fortune, gave many speeches, and published several books trying to warn America about the Jewish Mafia.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read a fascinating article in the New York Times today which described a Jewish museum exhibit about 1917 -- a pivotal year in Jewish history.

Boobus Americanus 2: Oh. What happened in 1917?

Sugar: The %$#&*^@ &$#@ sstuck it up our collective rectumss good and hard with a three-fer --- Bolshevissm, Zionissm and Globalissm -- that'ss what frickin' happened!!!

Editor: (palm to face, shaking head, sighing)

James A. Wilson #fundie fstdt.com

Taylor Swift is an evil succubus who hates the things of Almighty God! She’s a sinful satanist communist, and she’s utterly reprehensible! Her latest album is an open display of her drunkenness, vindictiveness, lust, fornication, lesbianism with Karlie Kloss, as well as her open defiance of God’s natural laws!

I was removed from “Conserva”pedia because I’m a truth teller and I wasn’t gonna stand for them whitewashing the harm of Swift as well as sex!

Elizabeth Minkel #sexist medium.com

Mary Sue
From self-inserts to imagines, how young women write themselves into the narrative
Illustration by the incredible Maia Kobabe

[This piece was written in conjunction with the most recent episode of the Fansplaining podcast. Follow us on Twitter or Tumblr, and if you’re interested in supporting our work—helping us commission more art and pieces like this—please consider donating to our Patreon.]

1.

Let’s start with the woman in question. She isn’t usually called Mary Sue—she has a less plausible, more fanciful name. Similarly, she has less plausible, more fanciful physical features than your average girl: purple eyes, or really extraordinary hair. You don’t know her, but you know the characters that surround her—she’s a new student at Hogwarts, an important ally you meet in Rivendell, the person on whom Holmes and Watson will rely to crack the case. She is notably smarter, stronger, and/or more beautiful than her peers. She’s going to save the day—and maybe a character you know will fall in love with her, too. She’s a wholly original character, though she might resemble an idealized version of the author. She’s a super-girl, bending beloved stories around her, heroism in a world mostly made up of heroes.

Oh, also: she is the ultimate object of scorn. She is the literal worst. She is embarrassing, self-indulgent trash; she ruins the story with her competence, her desirability, and the way all those characters you love seem to love her. She’s been described an endless number of colorful ways, including (via Fanlore’s meticulous and depressing entry on Mary Sues) the “literary equivalent of publicly soiling yourself.” She is everything that’s wrong with fanfiction, with girls writing stories, with fangirls, period.

The most basic definition of “Mary Sue” is an original female character in fanfiction—which is largely about established characters and worlds—who is often close to perfect. Like, too perfect. Very good at her job, very desirable romantically or sexually, and sometimes very emotionally moving when she dies, tragically, and the other characters mourn her. The story usually centers around her, often warping established characterization in the process. She’s self-indulgent, to be sure, but she’s harmless, and framed this way, one might wonder why young girls writing themselves into their favorite worlds is the literary equivalent of publicly soiling yourself. If you have to wonder that, though, you might not be familiar with the way the world treats young girls.

“Mary Sue” was coined by Paula Smith in 1970s Star Trek fandom, in a very short story that began, “‘Gee, golly gosh, gloriosky,’ thought Mary Sue as she stepped on the bridge of the Enterprise. ‘Here I am, the youngest lieutenant in the Fleet—only 15–1/2 years old.’” Lieutenant Mary Sue, object of affection of Kirk, Spock, and the rest of the men of Star Trek: TOS, was meant to be a parody of what Smith had observed in the fanzines of the day: “The term caught on because she’s very identifiable: Here it is, that same character, and isn’t it a shame because she’s just so tiresome,” she told an interviewer at Transformative Works and Cultures in 2011.

The conversation, conducted 40 years after Lieutenant Mary Sue first stepped onto the bridge, is an interesting one, not least because of the vague sense of disconnect between the literary analysis around the term (why bending a story around your original character might make for bad fiction, or at least not-terribly-enjoyable fiction if you aren’t the author) and the gendered morass that the term has sunk into (or, arguably, where it began).

Mary Sues weren’t born in Trek fandom—one researcher drew parallels between modern self-insert fic and stories that girls wrote about versions of themselves in the nineteenth century—but the term was born in an era of paper zines, a time of limited space for fanfiction, and arguably one with a different relationship between fic writers and their readers. When she first coined the term, Smith says, “In the letter columns, we started seeing the writers react: ‘What’s so wrong with my story? I’m just telling a story that I think is great.’” Even detractors admit Mary Sues are about young girls finding their power and agency in a world of fictional landscapes that rarely afford such journeys to women. After all, the original Mary Sue was the youngest lieutenant in the Fleet.

The days of limited space and resources in fic production are ancient history: there is always room for another story in the internet’s archives, and the general ethos of the broader fanfiction community has long been “don’t like, don’t read.” Many stories are self-indulgent, whether they feature a stand-in for the author or or not. But hatred of Mary Sues is embedded in the culture, self-perpetuating, and has seemingly ramped up since fic came online. In the early digital days, some archives banned Mary Sues outright; to this day, blogs exist solely to call peoples’ original characters Mary Sues, and to deconstruct and mock them accordingly.

Once the seed was planted in cultural discourse, Mary Sue accusations became impossible to stop—the toxicity surrounding the term has spread far beyond fanfiction self-inserts. Not long after it was coined, “Mary Sue” became any original female character in fanfiction; for decades, women have been reporting that they stopped writing original female characters, then female characters altogether, for fear of the “Mary Sue” label. Canonical female characters seen as threats to male/male romances in fic got the term, too—one notable (and incredibly troubling) example is the treatment of Nyota Uhura in fic about the rebooted Star Trek films. And over the years, the term has seeped across pop culture, to the point where “Mary Sue” becomes any female lead, anywhere. Bella Swan, Katniss Everdeen, and Rey from Star Wars are just a few slapped with the label. It’s just so annoying that their respective plots center around them, they must be Mary Sues.

(There are male Mary Sues, in case you’re wondering: “Marty Stu,” “Gary Stu,” and other variations have shown up over the years. People try to counter, even undercut, the inherent misogyny in the Mary Sue conversation by naming too-competent, too-desirable leading men—Captain Kirk, Luke Skywalker, and James Bond are famous examples. There’s an old joke: “What do you call a male Mary Sue?” The answer? “A protagonist.” It’s—not a particularly funny joke.)

But just as fanfiction writers are fighting back against historical scorn towards the practice at large, in recent years fans have been standing up for Mary Sues, too. Critics of the term are working to excise it from discussions around professional works, where it disproportionally targets women writing novels about female characters. In an act of reclamation, one of the most popular female-led geek sites on the internet took the term for its name. And within fan writing communities, people are going to bat for even the most self-indulgent Mary Sues, questioning why we shame young fans for making themselves the heroes of their own stories. But is a long-embedded stigma that easy to shake?

2.

It feels like every other fanfiction writer you talk to has a tale of their own early Mary Sues. Not everyone got called out for them—plenty of people learned to self-censor when they saw others getting shamed. My podcast partner, Flourish, reports that her early original female character was a student who proved vital to a case that Mulder and Scully were investigating. My first fanfic was almost entirely original characters, sketched out on yellow legal pads—I took a minor character from a book series and gave him a diverse team of corporate executives (don’t ask, it’s a weirdly long explanation). But by age 14, when I fell in love with Buffy and learned about online fandom, I was writing stories featuring a banshee who was old friends with Rupert Giles named—Ophelia. (I swear to God, I had no idea about the implications at the time, I just thought “Ophelia” sounded pretty, just as I loved “Cecilia” until Simon & Garfunkel ruined it for me.)

But these days more women are pushing back against the original characters they once felt ashamed of. After all, why shouldn’t young girls write the most spectacular versions of themselves—and why shouldn’t they want to see themselves in a story? In recent years I’ve been especially interested in watching women, people of color, and queer people reclaim the self-insertion narrative from one of indulgence to one of vital representation. In a piece partly about her youthful love of Lord of the Rings, Ash Davis writes,

“Be the change you wish to see,” Gandhi said (sorta). So I wrote my change. I discovered fanfiction and wrote all the damn change. I went into the painfully white fandoms of the things I loved—and wrote black folk into every last one of them. If there were no black people, I made them. If they were tokens, I made them stars. Mary-sued the shit out of everything. It didn’t matter, you were gonna see me!

In another piece I love about reclaiming the Mary Sue (via a medieval mystic, Margery Kempe, who essentially Mary Sued her way into the Bible in her writing, chilling with Mary and romancing Jesus), Ana Wilson writes about placing the female body back into reading—and into writing.

Reading The Book of Margery Kempe alongside fanfiction makes it clear that physical, imaginative reading is still associated with women, still considered embarrassing, and still employed as a form of resistance to mainstream narratives. People, in short, are still using this style of reading to elbow their way into texts from which they are restricted, just as Kempe and other women did with religious texts.

I wish I had my own Mary Sues to claim, but on a personal level, I’m a little more ambivalent. When I talk about good old Ophelia the Banshee, both “female” and an “original character” (and pulling from a very specific strand of symbolic mythology, for that matter), it’s easy to assume that I must have been writing a Mary Sue. But I can’t remember any specific connection between myself and the character, beyond the connections I have with every character I write, from the weary narrator of much of my original fiction who, like me, works at a racetrack, all the way to a certain pansexual immortal time traveling man from the 51st century.

The relationship between a writer and the characters she both reads and writes is a varied and complicated one. Fanfiction adds a layer onto that—the original characters in question aside, most of the people we write about started out as someone else’s characters, at least before the original work went out in the world. In the hands of fans, individually or collectively, a character often becomes someone else in the process. I should clarify: I don’t mean that fans are likely to render them out-of-character. But with the space and care that fanfiction can afford, fan writers often draw a favorite world’s characters as richer, more complicated—more human.

So unless you’re writing self-inserts or original characters, fanfic is partly about getting into the headspace of a character you didn’t create. That, for me anyway, is one of fanfiction’s chief pleasures—I’ve written before that for most fans, fic isn’t about wacky plots, as people outside fandom often assume, but about understanding a character so well that the interesting part comes when you stick them in a wacky plot (sure, “there’s only one hotel room left” counts as wacky), apply pressure, and see how they react.

For me, in my post-Ophelia Banshee days, inhabiting other characters as I write fanfiction has been vitally important. I read and write fic for a simultaneous distance and closeness with these characters—I allow them into my head, but I’m not looking to project myself back onto them. Part of this is privilege: whiteness, and I’m especially thinking of the un-interrogated whiteness of my adolescence, often lets white people assume a “default” position. A disproportionate number of the characters on our pages and screens are white, and from that lens shared whiteness with characters feels less like commonality and more like a lack of difference. Part of it is the opposite of privilege: the minefield of my struggles with gender and sexuality—almost definitely a subject for a totally separate essay—have left me perpetually out of step with many characters I encounter on pages and screens. When I think about myself in relation to a story, I slip away—a bit ironic, I suppose, for someone fascinated by girls who write themselves into stories. Or maybe that’s the whole point.

But part of it’s not just me: I hesitate to get too reductive on the links between shaming girls out of their own stories and the kinds of things that dominate many corners of the fanfiction world, but one could draw a line from the embarrassment of the Mary Sue to the positioning of certain types of characters in fandom as “default.” In the vast landscape of popular media, at least in the Anglo-American context, we’re implicitly taught to view the white male character as neutral, blank, infinitely relatable. While media certainly can shoulder some blame, fans should be held responsible, too, and the way young fans are encouraged, gently or mockingly, to step out of their own perspectives, away from their own backgrounds, and into the perspective of certain types of characters is one of the lasting legacies of the Mary Sue construction.

3.

When we consider the Mary Sue and her position in fandom at large, those of us outside the real person fic space often tend to overlook the fact that as long as celebrity fandom has existed, fannish communities have been built on self-insert fic with female protagonists. For many readers, this kind of story is sought after, not an object of scorn. The self-inserts that populate a lot of boy band RPF, for example, are perspective characters that, just like Mary Sues, allow young women to gain narrative control of their relationships with the objects of their affection.

Perspective is important in fanfic. It’s obviously also important in all other fiction, ever, but fic can sometimes feel particularly preoccupied with it. After all, perspective shift is one of the bedrocks of the practice; fans love nudging the spotlight off a canonical protagonist. RPF is an interesting space to examine perspective, and the way the “default” (white, male) gaze gets shattered and refashioned. There’s the complicated sort of circular gaze of stories from the celebrity’s point of view, where the reader watches the celebrity watching a character who’s often a stand-in for the reader. And while second-person fic feels more prevalent in fanfiction at large than it does in the published fiction world, it often feels ubiquitous in RPF spaces. Lumped under a second-person umbrella stories that work very differently in form and function, from fleshed-out second person narrators to “x Reader” stories that eschew identifying details to “imagines,” short prompts that exist in a murky space between fiction and daydream fodder.

When you place those fleshed-out narrators side-by-side with Mary Sues, it’s an interesting study in contrasts: where a Mary Sue is too-perfect, the self-insert narrator is often fairly ordinary, beaten down in some way, frustrated with her situation, not quite aware of her own attractiveness or agency. (Part of the pleasure of the narrative arc is the realization, and reclamation of that agency.) These characters and this type of fic is wildly popular on Wattpad, so much so that the platform commissioned an entire anthology of second-person RPF entitled IMAGINES, released last year with a shiny silver mirror on its cover alongside the words “Celebrity encounters starring YOU.”

The imagines of the anthology are, a little confusingly, not quite the same thing as “imagines,” the prompts that are increasingly popular on Tumblr and Wattpad. The anthology’s stories, about chance encounters with celebrities, are narrated by women of various ages and backgrounds with clear characterization and perspective. They’re not all romantic: in one story, a mother embarrasses her teenage daughter when she brings home Nicholas Hoult for dinner, the “you” full of maternal affection for the actor; in another, “you” are on the run with Kim Kardashian, a freedom fighter in an America where the government has outlawed selfies (Kim is on the run because she keeps taking them, obviously). The “yous” are unremarkable, but there’s a bit of knowing space between the reader and the narrator: we can tell you’re selling yourself short, and we’re waiting for you to realize it.

Actual imagines, in contrast, leave you to do most of the work of constructing a protagonist. They are short, sometimes a single sentence: “Imagine: You and Ed take a camping trip to get away from the media,” reads one on a popular Tumblr devoted to imagines, accompanied by a gif of Ed Sheeran looking sort of bashful. How you met, the state of your relationship, literally everything about “you” is up in the air—whether the reader even feels compelled to fill those gaps is a matter of preference. The “you” in an imagine isn’t necessarily average-looking or untalented—the same blog offers you a gif of Sebastian Stan looking charmed accompanied by, “Imagine: When Sebastian first meets you he is speechless and stunned by your beauty.” Imagines are interesting often not because of what they contain, but what they lack—the wide-open spaces they leave, utterly customizable, whether you spin a single-sentence prompt into a 60,000-word story or just imagine you and Ed Sheeran sitting in a tent. As a self-insert narrator, you are as present or as absent as you want.

The protagonists of “x Reader” stories are similarly blank: often called “y/n,” short for “your name,” these stories are the most literal expression of “self-insert” imaginable, since the pairing is you, the reader, and the celebrity of the title. These stories vary, but sometimes they tread so lightly in an attempt to leave “y/n” as neutral as possible that they wind up feeling a bit like Mad Libs, instructing you to fill in, say, your favorite book rather than just name one the narrator might like. Sometimes x Reader stories follow a full narrative arc; other times they feel like a collected set of imagines. When I got sucked in researching, I wound up in a story where in each chapter, you successively date, then marry, each of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

The prevalence and growing popularity of images and x Reader stories amongst younger fans is a fascinating shift when I think of the self-inserts of previous generations. If a Mary Sue is a projection, a young woman’s ideal self on the page, then an imagine is more likely to be a reflection: exactly who you are, at the center of the story. Mary Sues are aspirational, but in a way, so are these other self-insert forms: they construct worlds in which your fictional self, going about your incredibly ordinary life, is just as important as Lieutenant Mary Sue. The story still bends around you.

The overwhelming popularity of self-inserts on Wattpad, a fanfiction hub with a younger demographic than other archives, leaves me both curious and hopeful about young girls right now, writing themselves into stories. I know that reader x boy-band-star-of-the-moment isn’t exactly a new construction; while I was working on my weird diverse corporate team and Flourish was helping the FBI catch aliens, my contemporaries were writing themselves into Hanson’s green room and *NSYNC’s tour bus, stories they’d later disavow (and, haltingly, reclaim).

Today’s social media is restructuring our conceptions of personal identity—we increasingly center ourselves in our own narratives. Don’t worry, I’m not about to go on some “narcissistic millennial” rant. Quite the opposite: it’s heartening to see young women, young queer people, young people of color, center themselves in narratives when our screens and pages are still lacking. In the fanfiction world, just like in the rest of the world, we still hold marginalized characters, original or otherwise, to impossible standards. But perhaps our embrace of Mary Sues—even if they’re the most achingly perfect young woman to ever command a ship in the Fleet—will help change things for the better.

James A. Wilson #fundie #sexist #homophobia #forced-birth #kinkshaming conservatism.referata.com

[From the "About" page of the NTBC's official website (if you could call it official)]

[li]We believe in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The Holy Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is how the One True God is manifested. We reject any "oneness doctrine" and the "Jesus-only" movement as heretical.[/li]
[li]We reject any idols or any other gods, such as Allah, Buddha, Taylor Swift, and all these other Mormon "gods" and the false gods Jehovah's Witnesses worship.[/li]
[li]We accept the passion, crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesus Christ as the only remission of sins, and no "hocus pocus" including "sacrificial" worship has any impact on grace.[/li]
[li]The world is in a fallen state, and anyone who desires to be saved must accept the Lord Jesus Christ as their personal savior. We reject Universalism here.[/li]
[li]We believe in baptism by immersion only, and only to be done upon those who are of the age of reason. Baptism is a symbolic act showing the believer buried with Christ and cleansed of sins.[/li]
[li]Likewise, we reject any concept of "original sin" as Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, and Protestant groups understand it, and thus reject baptismal regeneration and the baptism of infants.[/li]
[li]Men are to be the sole breadwinners, and women are to be in charge of domestic household affairs. This is godly naturally ordained gender roles.[/li]
[li]We believe that homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God, and that homosexuals cannot be saved since they are vile reprobate. They are damned eternally for being homosexuals.[/li]
[li]Abortion, capital punishment, physician assisted suicide, and other forms of killing are unequivocally condemned since God hath said "thou shalt not kill."[/li]
[li]Racism in all its forms are likewise unequivocally condemned by New Testament Baptist Church. All creatures are created in the image of God, and one's skin color is irrelevant to one's character.[/li]
[li]Modest attire that covers the entire body is required, and as such we do not accept the movement of men wearing shorts and women showing breasts and legs, for instance.[/li]
[li]All forms of secular music, television, film, and literature are to be treated with the utmost scrupulosity and to be cast out if offending material is found.[/li]

James A. Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Communism is a far-left immoral atheistic political ideology that calls for a classless, stateless, moneyless society. This is the logical conclusion to any form of leftism. In order to achieve this, socialism must replace capitalism and theoretically this ends up with the communist utopia. In practice, this results in brutal totalitarian regimes that ban religion and promote eugenics, which is a subset of Darwinism.
Karl Marx first proposed this idea in the Communist Manifesto, and after the Russian Revolution the Soviet Union was formed to try to implement communism. Vladimir Lenin failed, and Josef Stalin decided to try to create communism in one country. Mao Zedong, Fidel Castro, and other brutal dictators then attempted to implement communism to no avail.
Luke 19:13 says "And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come." Here, the Lord Jesus Christ condemns any form of leftism such as communism as here he is delivering a solid free market parable because we are to engage in capitalistic business until Jesus Christ returns again.
Even though the Soviet Union has collapsed, communism still exists in countries such as China, Cuba, Denmark, France, Vietnam, and Laos.
Those in the West who identify as communist are most likely male, unshaven, obese, unemployed, living in their mother's basement, and $200,000 in debt over a "gender studies" degree. They may also claim to have the fake disability of "autism" to justify living off the government dole and desire that everyone may experience the rationing and lack of innovation and ingenuity that plagued the former Soviet Union.

List of Communist Slogans

Workers of the world, unite!
The only church that enlightens us is the church that burns!
The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.
Political power comes from the barrel of a gun
From each according his faculty, to each according to their need
There will be no further explanation. There will just be reputation.

List of Famous Communists

Karl Marx
Frederich Engels
Vladimir Lenin
Josef Stalin
Fidel Castro
Mao Zedong
Bernie Sanders
Barry Soetoro
Taylor Swift
Van Jones
George Soros

The Real James A. Wilson #fundie fstdt.com

I am a DEACON in NTBC, Pastor Grimes is the only PASTOR WE HAVE. Only someone with such a severe intellectual disability as autism would even think that there are these transitional fossils and these other things like men becoming women as women becoming men! It's important because it's degrading our culture and turning our nation into a bunch of sissy whiny millennial autistic snowflake retards! I'm sick of it! Stupid intellectually challenged millennials with their transgender and intersex and whatever other garbage the pull out of their rears! This is what happens when you turn your backs on the Lord!

The Real James A. Wilson #fundie fstdt.com

So you autistic liberals are "scientists" now? God created the world, because there's no evidence that we evolved! Zero transitional fossils have been found and ZERO will ever be found! Of course, those fools like ENGINEER Bill Nye will try to claim "Lucy" is the "missing link" whenever no such thing exists. I'm not surprised autistic liberals who think that people came from pond slime would think that we can make a man into a woman with some cosmetic surgery. If Bradley Manning and Bruce Jenner are women, than Michael Jackson was Caucasian. Fools!

Steven R. #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Sermon 8: Baptism

By Bro. Steven R.

Bro. James Wilson and I are both filling in for Rev. Grimes this week, so I have a short sermon that will serve as a companion to Bro. James' about proper administration of the church. Check his out here

Let's start with the Greek word "ßapt???," or "baptizo," which is a verb meaning "to immerse." This is the verb used to describe baptism in the New Testament. "The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:" 1 Peter 3:21. So we are to be immersed, and baptism does not forgive sins. It is supposed to be a symbol of us dying and being buried with Christ, and you simply cannot have that symbolic ordinance with sprinkling or pouring! We are to be baptized by immersion in clean water, and there is no grace in the act itself, but in the ultimate Sacrifice and Resurrection of Christ! This is according to Colossians 2:12, "Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead."

For instance, we often talk on here about different entertainers that are leading susceptible youth to sins. Many were raised in Roman Catholic or Protestant backgrounds, and being sprinkled as babies will not save their soul since YE MUST BE BORN AGAIN! They are going to be sent to Hell with their false idols if they keep believing in false idols in the modern form of Baal! This is why we are Baptist, and not Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, or Protestant! We are Baptists because we have the fullness of truth and strong doctrines! Mark 16:16 says that "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned." It does NOT say that baptism causes one to be saved! You MUST believe first! Believeth and not be damned! Not baptized and not be damned! You CANNOT believe if you are an infant, so infant "baptism" is a SHAM! Believer's baptism with immersion after believing and being saved and born again is the ONLY WAY and it is plainly stated in the trustworthy KJV!

The Real James A. Wilson #fundie fstdt.com

Trannies hateth the Word of the Lord! I will keep on calling Bruce Jenner Bruce Jenner and Bradley Manning Bradley Manning! I don't care what these depraved and wicked individuals think, because they're reprobate. They're both men because they have one X chromosome and one Y chromosome and no amount of surgery could change that. It's funny how liberals love junk science like Darwinism and hate real science like this.

James Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Sermon 7: Singing a Joyful Noise Unto the Lord
By Bro. James Wilson
Bro. Steven R. and I will be filling in for Reverend Grimes this week as we work to make New Testament Baptist Church a full time operation, so make sure to check out his companion sermon in the Sermon 8 slot. Both of us will have a short sermon this week.
Psalm 100:1-2 says "Make a joyful noise unto the Lord, all ye lands. Serve the Lord with gladness: come before his presence with singing." If we are going to sing, we have to sing loudly and sing praises unto the Lord Jesus Christ. Men have gotta be MANLY IN CHRIST JESUS and stop whispering like what happens when these liberal McChurches have these garbage services with "contemporary Christian music!" They're over there wearing AC/DC and Hooter's shirts in these "non-denominational" fun-houses that try to be inclusive and have zero doctrine like the Episcopalians and the Unitarian Universalists! They don't condemn sodomy, Onanism, or lust, and they have these Starbucks stores outside after they sing their effeminate "contemporary Christian" trash! You have to sing old school hymns from old school hymnals and sing like a MAN like Elvis Presley did in his gospel records!!!!
When they sing in that effeminate way, they sound like they are in the bedroom whispering to their wives like in bedroom conduct. They have these microphones and they're acting like they're trying to serenade the audicence like those Backstreet Boy and *NSYNC boy bands!!! Not honoring the Lord like He saith in Psalm 100!!! Or like how Taylor Swift the evil succubus whispers and moans in her new song "Ready for It" which sounds just like this fake contemporary "Christian" trash sounds! Let your noises unto the Lord be JOYFUL AND LOUD AND NOT RESEMBLING BEDROOM CONDUCT SO YOU CAN HONOR GOD AS SCRIPTURE PRESCRIBES!

Patrick Scrivener #conspiracy reformation.org

In the Holy Bible, spies and spying are held in utter contempt. Spying was a despicable business 3,700 years ago, and it is much more despicable today. About 3,700 years ago there was a universal famine, and thanks to Joseph, Egypt was the only country with grain.

Joseph–a type of the Messiah–was ruler in Egypt when his brothers came down from Canaan to buy grain. Joseph accused his brothers of the worst crime imaginable: he called them SPIES:

And Joseph remembered the dreams which he dreamed of them, and said unto them, "ye are spies; to see the nakedness of the land ye are come" (Genesis 42:9).

Joseph's brothers denied that they were spies because they told him that they were HONEST men:

And they said unto him, "no, my lord, but to buy food are thy servants come. We are all one man's sons; we are HONEST men, thy servants are no spies" (Genesis 42:10-11).

Joseph commanded his brother to prove to him that they were honest men . . . and not spies:

"Send one of you, and let him bring your brother; and ye shall be kept in prison, that your words may be tested to see whether there is any truth in you; or else, by the life of Pharaoh, surely ye are spies!" (Genesis 42:16)
In the New Covenant, the Messiah was shadowed day and night by spies hired by the religious leaders:

So they watched him, and sent spies (Gk. en-ka-the-tos, Lat. insidiatores) who pretended to be righteous, that they might seize on his words, in order to deliver him to the power and the authority of the governor (Luke 20:20).
The Greek word enkathetos is translated as insidiatores in the Latin Vulgate Version. This is the origin of the English word insidious which meansoccult, deceiving, treacherous, evil, cunning, and perfidious . . . as in "Perfidious Albion."
Saint Paul warned the Congregation of those insidious spies who sought to undermine the Christian Faith from within:

And this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Joshua, that they might bring us into bondage) (Galatians 2:4).

The most infamous spy or secret agent in all of history was Judas Iscariot, who sold the Messiah for 30 pieces of silver. Judas is actually honored by the Vatican by having a day named for him: SPY WEDNESDAY.

As the year 1910 approached, Italy was preparing to celebrate 40 years of liberty from the Papal tyranny.

France was a Republic, and the intelligent French people had finally disowned the Papal monarchy.

In 1910, Pope Pius X issued a decree called Quam Singulari which mandated that spying on children through the confessional should begin at age 7.

Only 2 countries were left that had the military power to restore the lost Papal States: Britain and united Germany under Prussia.

At that time, Orthodox Russia was the greatest military power in Europe, and the first country to recognize the new Italian government in Rome.

Britain's espionage service began during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I . . . and it was legendary. Their ciphers were so sophisticated that the Spanish accused the British of using witchcraft to compose them!!

The Vatican has a sophisticated spying system know as the confessional going back over 1000 years.

The British monarchs still bore the pompous title Fidei Defensor or Defender of the (Latin) Faith. Now was the time to earn that title by full cooperation with the Vatican espionage system.

MI5 and MI6 were formed in 1908

The British had a "secret service" going back to the time of Queen Elizabeth I, but its existence was kept hidden, as most decent people considered espionage to be despicable.

With the loss of the Papal States in 1870, the Vatican no longer had secure communications, even though their confessional was still the most sophisticated spying service in the world.

This necessitated a Vatican merger with the newly created international spy agency called MI6.

Britain's legendary secret service came out of the closet in 1908.

MI5 concentrated on domestic spying while MI6 was international.

Mansfield Cumming was the first head of MI6.

About that time, a series of novels began to appear by a man named William Le Queux warning the nation about the German threat of invasion. In past history, it was always the Spanish or French who were plotting to invade. In 1588, England was saved from invasion because the mighty Spanish Armada was defeated by a small English navy....By 1910, Great Britain had the most powerful navy in the world and her slogan was "Britannia rules the waves."

The Germans are coming, the Germans are coming!!

Their spies are everywhere!!

It is beyond belief that this lying propaganda was allowed to be published because all the British royal family were of German descent.

Le Queux was a sinister Jesuit and the forerunner of James Bond author Ian Fleming.

William Le Queux (pronounced "Q") was a bestselling propaganda writer.

His propaganda created a German scare and led to the formation of MI5 and MI6.

In reality, Germany was infiltrated by British spies preparing that nation to invade France and Russia.

Here is an excerpt from a book about MI6 by a British expert on spying:

They (Germans ) did not constitute anything like a major threat and the spy scare that swept Britain in the early 1900s was in fact out of all proportion to the reality. It was stoked, even orchestrated, by the author William Le Queux, who produced a series of best-selling books–with titles like Spies of the Kaiser: Plotting the Downfall of England and The Invasion of 1910–that deliberately set out to blur the lines between fact and fiction.

Le Queux protested vigorously to anyone who would listen, and many influential people did, that the authorities were negligently ignoring the German threat. Lord Northcliffe, proprietor of the Daily Mail, serialised The Invasion of 1910 in his newspaper, carefully rerouting the hypothetical marauding Hun troops through towns and villages where the Mail's circulation was at its highest. (Smith, MI6. The Real James Bonds, p. 1).

Le Queux compared the Franco-Prussian War of 1870 to the forthcoming invasion of England in 1910. What MI6 really had in mind was a repeat of that war, with united Germany invading France, restoring the monarchy, and as a bonus restoring the Papal States. What a knavish trick!!

This would be accomplished in reality, not by German spies in Britain, but by British spies in Germany.

World War I was an MI6 knavish trick!!

In the British national anthem they pray that God will frustrate the "knavish tricks" of their monarch's enemies. World War I was one such "knavish trick" carried out by MI6. Of course, MI6 is financed by the Bank of England and answers to the monarchy.

Instead of German spies infiltrating Britain, MI6 spies infiltrated Germany, and they helped the Kaiser with the invasion of Belgium and France in August 1914.

The rapid Prussian victory of the Franco-Prussian war was not repeated.

The war became a stalemate of bloody trench warfare.

An MI6 agent named Adolf Hitler served as a "courier" during the war.

Adolf Hitler–the most infamous spy in history–served as a "courier" during the war. Courier is just an euphemism for spy. Hitler was a good "courier" as he was fluent in English having been trained by MI6 in England from 1909 to 1913.

With the bloody war at a stalemate, and thousands dying daily, MI6 pulled off another knavish trick to get the United States involved in the war.

The Zimmerman telegram led to war between the U.S. and Germany!!

A telegram led to the start of the Franco Prussian war . . . so why not use a telegram to get the U.S. involved in WWI? That was the reasoning of MI6, as their agent in Germany sent a telegram to the German ambassador in Mexico, promising German help to recover the territories Mexico lost in the Mexican-American War.

Sir William Wiseman was the MI6 spy charged with getting the U.S. involved in WWI.

His counterpart in Germany was Arthur Zimmermann.

Zimmermann was the author of the infamous Zimmermann telegram which led President Wilson to declare war on Germany.

At the very beginning of the war, the English cable ship Telconia ripped up 5 of the undersea cables connecting Germany with the United States. After the Telconia's work was done, only one cable remained open to Germany, and it ran from West Attica to Brazil. That cable was owned by the United States.

Apart from the West Africa-Brazil cable, all German communications had to be made via unsecure radio. Zimmermann's telegram said:

FROM 2nd from London # 5747.

"We intend to begin on the first of February unrestricted submarine warfare. We shall endeavor in spite of this to keep the United States of America neutral. In the event of this not succeeding, we make Mexico a proposal of alliance on the following basis: make war together, make peace together, generous financial support and an understanding on our part that Mexico is to reconquer the lost territory in Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. The settlement in detail is left to you. You will inform the President of the above most secretly as soon as the outbreak of war with the United States of America is certain and add the suggestion that he should, on his own initiative, invite Japan to immediate adherence and at the same time mediate between Japan and ourselves. Please call the President's attention to the fact that the ruthless employment of our submarines now offers the prospect of compelling England in a few months to make peace." Signed, ZIMMERMANN.

The telegram was leaked to the press by President Wilson on March 1, 1917. It created a sensation. Most people were highly skeptical and suspected perfidious Albion. Then, to the utter amazement of all, Zimmermann admitted that he had sent the telegram:

If, on top of these denials, Zimmermann challenged the United States to prove the authenticity of the telegram, the American government, restricted by its pledge of secrecy to Great Britain, would be unable to do it. The Cabinet could only agree to assert emphatically that they possessed conclusive evidence, and unhappily disperse.

Unbelievably, next morning, to the "profound amazement and relief," in Lansing's words, of everyone concerned, Zimmermann inexplicably admitted his authorship. It was a second blunder, wrote Lansing, almost bemused with relief, of a most astounding kind. He thought it showed Zimmermann to be not at all astute and resourceful, for in admitting the truth he not only settled the question in American minds but threw away an opportunity to find out how we had obtained the message.

What led Zimmermann, who, despite Lansing, was both astute and resourceful, to commit this historic boner, is not known. That he was too stunned to think clearly is unlikely, for the Germans had had two days to consider their answer and Germans do not issue official statements off the cuff. Probably he reasoned that since the Americans had somehow acquired a true version of the message they were likely also to have acquired some documentary proof of its authorship; therefore denial could only make him look foolish. This was logical but as not infrequent with logic, wrong. (Tuckman, The Zimmermann Telegram, p. 183).

We should not be surprised at all because Zimmerman was one of hundreds of MI6 agents working in Germany.

Edward M. House was the puppetmaster of Woodrow Wilson.

Wilson's real name was WOLFSON and his father was a Khazar from Germany.

Wilson worked closely with House and Wiseman to drag the U.S. into war.

Thanks to the "miracle" of the Zimmermann telegram, Wilson declared war on April 2, 1917. With the unlimited resources of the United States, the British could now start pulling soldiers from the Western Front, and transfer them to Palestine to fight the Turks.

T. E. Lawrence, known as Lawrence of Arabia, was just one of the numerous MI6 agents in the Mideast.

Lawrence worked closely with Harry St. John Bridger Philby to expel the Turks and create a British Empire state of "Israel" in the Mideast.
Out of the ruins of the defeated Turkish empire, Saudi Arabia, and the British Empire state of "Israel" was created.

Spies like to keep spying in the "family."

MI6 Haji Williamson was the father of MI6 Ayatollah Khomeini.

Ayatollah Khomeini was the "father" of the Islamic "Republic" of Iran.
A "Republic" is an oxymoron in Islam because that system is completely despotic and monarchial.

James Wilson #fundie rationalwiki.org

It's obvious that when liberals can't come up with a coherent rebuttal, they resort to calling their opponents "trolls." It's quite sad, really, because it represents the dumbing down of culture that is manifested by the fact that we are using scantily clad women to sell the double bacon cheeseburgers that are causing our people to be unhealthy and obese. The Episcopal Church keeps on declining, yet clergy won't rethink their approval of homosexuality. Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results, and liberalism is a mental disorder.--Elvis is King (talk) 21:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

James Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Speak Now is the 2010 liberal album by noted succubus, harlot, and nominal Episcopalian degenerate Taylor Swift. This album is a testament to the rejection of the lordship of Jesus Christ, makes a mockery out of substitutionary atonement, and promotes greed, lust, and selfishness.

Proponents of this album have noted its "pure" and "family friendly" allure, but this is treachery placed upon intellectually devoid parents of impressionable teenage girls by Lucifer himself. This lyric from the song "Better Than Revenge" contains explicit references to bedroom conduct, as well as prideful arrogance. "She's not a saint and she's not what you think /She's an actress, whoa /She's better known for the things that she does / On the mattress, whoa" James 4:6 says " But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble."

Another example of this wickedness is in the song "Sparks Fly" which contains "And you stood there in front of me just / Close enough to touch /Close enough to hope you couldn't see / What I was thinking of" as well as "My mind forgets to remind me, your a bad idea /You touch me once and it's really something / You find I'm even better than you, imagined I would be" and if THAT was not enough see "I run my fingers through your hair / And watch the lights go wild / Just keep on keeping your eyes on me /Its just wrong enough to make it feel right" So, Taylor Swift admitted to lusting after the flesh as well as engaging in premarital relations, and is therefore encouraging her audience of susceptible teenage girls to do the same. Ephesians 6:11 instructs us to put on the whole armor of God, and Matthew 5:28 says that lustful thoughts are the same as adultery. Taylor Swift is a wicked sinner, no better than other wicked sinners like homos and murderers.

The accompanying tour to this album, the Speak Now World Tour, was a flop and managed to convert no one to the false religion of Taylor Swift and her traveling "church" of sexual impurity and prideful boastfulness. However, more Americans are indeed coming to conservative Bible believing Independent Fundamental Baptist churches, and rejecting the wicked sinful "church" of Taylor Swift and her wicked hymns of unrighteousness and this false religion is crumbling as more and more find their faith in the everliving and One True God, the Lord Jesus Christ!

James Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is a liberal pretend businessman, star of a "reality" show lacking substance, and a professional wrestling heel who usurped the Republican Party's nomination through false promises, and a RINO who became the forty-fifth President of the United States. Since assuming office, Trump has largely followed in the footsteps of his predecessor, Barack Hussein Obama.
Trump was raised in Queens, New York City, and moved to Manhattan to lead a failed business venture based on scams and he is a nominal Presbyterian who cares not for the things of God. Although he claims not to drink alcohol, his business and former residence Trump Tower sells cocktails in a bar because Trump has not heeded the clear teachings of the Bible against strong drink.
Trump is pro-choice, is for socialized medicine, hates the things of God, and nominated Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. Gorsuch is even more liberal than Obama nominee Merrick Garland, and the Supreme Court was supposed to be a selling point for conservatives to vote for Trump. Gorsuch is an Episcopalian who attended the parish of a woman "priest." Trump said he wants to get more money in health care.
Trump is a friend of Islam, was open to celebrating Ramadan at the White House, and his "travel ban" excluded terrorist state Saudi Arabia in both iterations. Trump has yet to do anything substantive about radical Islamic terrorism, and creeping Sharia law in America and has supported liberal sodomite lover Ariana Grande under the guise of opposing radical Islamic terrorism. He has yet to endorse Koran burning.
Trump has yet to ban Islam, women "priests," and the evil succubus Taylor Swift who has seduced many with her perfectly circular and perky breasts and legs of Satan, despite Trump pledging to ban the liberal menace of pornography.
Trump picked closet homosexual Mike Pence to be his vice president, and has nominated false conservatives like pro-homo Rex Tillerson, pretend Christian Betsy DeVos, and pacifist Steve Bannon as well as Bush-era neocon goon James Mattis.
Trump has retained pro-sodomite executive orders of Obama. "Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." This liberal administration will lead America further from godliness and into sodomy and eventual destruction.

William Grimes #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Sermon 5: Giving Up Childish Things
By Rev. William H. Grimes
Let's take some time to talk about 1 Corinthians 13:11 today. It says "When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things." This is a particular favorite verse of Bro. James Wilson, so I thought I'd take some time to preach on it.
Here at New Testament Baptist Church, we don't mind holy fun. Staying up late and drinking coffee and having desserts in fellowship with other believers is fine. However, we don't condone sinful "fun" like alcohol, dancing, and lewd comments and actions. This corrupt society and so-called "Christians" partake of these things. Can you tell me why grown adults get drunk and urinate outside and make jokes about it? The Bible even says that " And it came to pass, when he began to reign, as soon as he sat on his throne, that he slew all the house of Baasha: he left him not one that pisseth against a wall, neither of his kinsfolks, nor of his friends." in 1 Kings 16:11. CHILDREN URINATE OUTSIDE AND SPEAK GIBBERISH! WHY DO ADULTS WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE MATURE GO AND GET DRUNK OF STRONG DRINK AND DO THE SAME THING?! PUT AWAY CHILDISH THINGS AND FIND A TOILET AND SOCIALIZE SOBER! HAVE A BIBLE STUDY! STOP GOING TO PUBS AND ACTING LIKE IMMATURE COLLEGE STUDENTS! GOD HATETH STRONG DRINK! DRINK WATER!!!!!!!! BE MATURE AND SHOW SOME RESPECT FOR YOURSELF!
A common problem with marriages these days is that women are neglected while men salivate over sports and video games and they consume strong drink with their buddies! Think they're all manly when their wives are over there lonely! You were already weak enough that you succumbed to your lust and married to avoid fornication! Why are you now neglecting your wife for childish garbage? Kids play sports and video games! PUT AWAY CHILDISH THINGS AND PUT ON THE WHOLE ARMOR OF GOD! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Women can't stop gossiping about others! 30 year old women are in the office gossiping about others like immature catty high school yuppies! An abomination unto the Lord is someone who IS A BUSYBODY AND CANNOT PUT AWAY CHILDISH THINGS AND PUT ON THE WHOLE ARMOR OF GOD!!!!!!!!!
PEOPLE WONDER WHY SOCIETY HAS DENIGRATED TO THE POINT THAT OUR PRESIDENT IS A CREEPY OLD PERVERT WHO CANNOT PUT AWAY CHILDISH THINGS AND HAD BRAGGED ABOUT UNRIGHTEOUS GENITAL GRABBING AND RATES WOMEN BASED UPON THEIR PHYSICAL APPEARANCES LIKE AN IMMATURE RANDY MIDDLE SCHOOL BOY! WHAT A SIMPLETON! GOD HATETH AMERICA BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT PASSES OFF AS A CHRISTIAN IN THIS CORRUPT SOCIETY! PORNOGRAPHY IS ILLEGAL AND OBSCENE BUT IT REMAINS ONLINE! GROWN MEN PLAY SPORTS AND VIDEO GAMES AND WATCH CARTOONS! WHEN ARE WE GOING TO PUT AWAY CHILDISH THINGS AND HAVE A GROWN UP SOCIETY THAT IS MATURE AND GODLY? IT NEEDS TO START NOW!!!!!!!!! God's people said AMEN!

James Wilson #fundie fstdt.com

The birth control hormones are getting in the waters and feminazis are raising boys on Ritalin so they become effeminate beta male cucks subservient to the feminazi agenda of eradicating God's natural hierarchy where WOMEN CANNOT TEACH MEN ANYTHING AND MUST STAY IN THE HOME! It is obvious that Swift is all about female empowerment and it's appalling because Jesus Christ isn't that long hair hippie guy depicted by the papists! Jesus Christ is almighty and righteous and our men need to be MANLY IN CHRIST and stop trying to act all effeminate and subservient like these hipster autistic nerds with their ponies and hentai and beards and man buns and rompers and fake affinity for science! "Men" are even wearing eyeliner and women's perfume nowadays while dykes and other feminazis are trampling all over them in defiance of God's natural law!

James Wilson #fundie rationalwiki.org

Taylor Swift is a succubus! If you lust after the flesh of Taylor Swift, you will NOT inherit the Kingdom of God! The evil succubus Taylor Swift has created a den for Lucifer in her wickedly sinful vagina, and Satan formed the evil nasty woman with perfectly circular and perky breasts because God would rather have weak trembling boys than STRONG MEN OF GOD! "Boys only want love if it's torture" this succubus has no interest in God and godly love and she didn't understand agape love so therefore she's a disgusting nasty woman who simply wants to have sex with as many men as possible and getting birth control hormones in the water and making men weak beta males full of estrogen like these atheist nerdy video game users who pretend to care about science! Wearing Pi shirts and taking advice from ENGINEER Bill Nye who claims to be an expert in biology, cosmology, astronomy, and meteorology! He's as much of a scientist as the manager of my nearest Wendy's! Little nerds on here can't even get anything right!

James Wilson #fundie rationalwiki.org

How's the autism, Frank? I think polio is less dangerous than autism because all these autistic nerds have no respect for their fellow man, and they cry and scream for no apparent reason because they're intellectually incapable of having a personal relationship with the Lord. If it wasn't for autism ungodly garbage like "hentai" and "My Little Pony" would have been eradicated by now. --Elvis is King (talk) 03:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

James Matthew Wilson #fundie newputneydebates.tumblr.com

The worst instinct of liberal democracy, its elevation of the expression of the individual human will to the one remaining sacred good, has thoroughly triumphed. It has reformed from within Christian and religious life along the lines of Moralistic Therapeutic Deism (MTD), where religion is reduced to a therapeutic servicing of our sense of “well being.” It has formed society most prominently through the sexual revolution, where fertility, monogamy, marriage, and now the distinction between man and woman are all to be redefined to conform to whatever so-and-so happens to desire today. Less obviously, but no less consequentially, it has transformed how we educate our children (to acquire means to exercise their will rather than to know what is true, good, and beautiful); how we spend our time (consuming blue light from screens); how we interact with one another (poorly); and how we interact with the natural world (with a mixture of avarice and guilt and seldom with a sense that we are a good part of it ordained to its just rule).

Whether we approve these changes or see them as diabolical, we are part of the society in which they are taking place. Should Christians seek to shore up or gain control of the mechanisms of power of that society? Will that better enable them to practice a good way of life and pass it on to their children and grandchildren? Or is it rather the case that the liberal order has advanced so far in its secular voluntarism that we would better spend our lives entering more consciously into our religious practices, seeking to deepen and renew them all the better to resist their deformation by the corrupt fancies of our age?

Dreher’s answer to these questions is a qualified one. Because orthodox Christians are intrinsically a part of the broader society, they have no choice but to influence its institutional life as best they can, but the forces arrayed against them are rich, formidable, and bloodthirsty. The Christian right has largely failed to redirect our culture after forty years of trying; we will be fortunate now to hold the opposition at bay—and this we must do. Dreher sees, rightly, that the powerful “liquid” liberalism of our age would not be so great if Christians had more truly rallied to Maritain’s vision nearly a century ago to purify the sources of our religious devotion and to renew our political lives so that they conform to and aid our vocation to the knowledge and love of God. Because the times are less propitious now, Dreher summons us to follow the example of the Benedictines, to conceive of new “rules” or disciplines by which we may live so that our days are shaped primarily by our perception of God as our good rather than by the fluid, insidious influences of the mainstream culture.

James Wilson #fundie fstdt.com

What Satan has done is wickedly clever. Swift has the optimal amount of perkiness in her breasts, and they are unnaturally circular to attempt to seduce men whenever she bends over while wearing a tank top and she shows off her breasts in these outrageously tight outfits where she barely manages to keep her breasts in the top. It's an utter abomination unto the Lord Jesus Christ!

James Wilson #fundie fstdt.com

The evil succubus Taylor Swift has these legs of Satan that are used to wrap weak men who lust after the flesh, and she crushes them with her perfectly formed exquisite thighs and thigh gap to ruin someone's love and devotion for the Lord Jesus Christ!

James Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

The Cult of Taylor Swift is a false religion reaching its way across the United States of America and the rest of the Western world. It is based on the presumption that the acceptable moral teachings are against the Lord Jesus Christ and for pornography, lust, fornication, paganism, self love, drunkenness, and also rejection of Biblical truths and sound Scriptural doctrine. Taylor Swift is the evil demonic agent responsible for this utterly atrocious exercise of feminism and socialism.

James Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Irrationalwiki is a liberal apostate website that is funded through means such as Media Matters and George Soros. They have managed to be even to the left of Wikipedia, and in doing so have created a place that denies the divinity of Jesus Christ and supports Darwinism. They ban anyone who dares to oppose Darwinist propaganda without any question whatsoever. They are an offshoot of Conservapedia and created this cesspool because they are awkward nerds who love video games and science fiction and can't hold a job or do anything productive in life. Therefore, lonely young white males mope around about the growth of real Christianity around the world thanks to true evangelicals.

James Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Speak Now is the 2010 liberal album by noted succubus, harlot, and nominal Episcopalian degenerate Taylor Swift. This album is a testament to the rejection of the lordship of Jesus Christ, makes a mockery out of substitutionary atonement, and promotes greed, lust, and selfishness.

Proponents of this album have noted its "pure" and "family friendly" allure, but this is treachery placed upon intellectually devoid parents of impressionable teenage girls by Lucifer himself. This lyric from the song "Better Than Revenge" contains explicit references to bedroom conduct, as well as prideful arrogance. "She's not a saint and she's not what you think /She's an actress, whoa /She's better known for the things that she does / On the mattress, whoa" James 4:6 says " But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble."

Another example of this wickedness is in the song "Sparks Fly" which contains "And you stood there in front of me just / Close enough to touch /Close enough to hope you couldn't see / What I was thinking of" as well as "My mind forgets to remind me, your a bad idea /You touch me once and it's really something / You find I'm even better than you, imagined I would be" and if THAT was not enough see "I run my fingers through your hair / And watch the lights go wild / Just keep on keeping your eyes on me /Its just wrong enough to make it feel right" So, Taylor Swift admitted to lusting after the flesh as well as engaging in premarital relations, and is therefore encouraging her audience of susceptible teenage girls to do the same. Ephesians 6:11 instructs us to put on the whole armor of God, and Matthew 5:28 says that lustful thoughts are the same as adultery. Taylor Swift is a wicked sinner, no better than other wicked sinners like homos and murderers.

The accompanying tour to this album, the Speak Now World Tour, was a flop and managed to convert no one to the false religion of Taylor Swift and her traveling "church" of sexual impurity and prideful boastfulness. However, more Americans are indeed coming to conservative Bible believing Independent Fundamental Baptist churches, and rejecting the wicked sinful "church" of Taylor Swift and her wicked hymns of unrighteousness and this false religion is crumbling as more and more find their faith in the everliving and One True God, the Lord Jesus Christ!

James Wilson #fundie fstdt.com

Taylor Swift is a viciously nasty woman, and she's causing so much destruction by making wicked people lust after her. Now, every single sperm is a life, and this is objective scientific truth. Therefore, Onan committed a sin of killing many human lives, and the same exact thing happens when a man selfishly abuses his flesh. Only the liberals with rocks in their heads fail to understand this simple concept.

Senpai mentioned us!!!

James Wilson #fundie #senpai_noticed_us conservatism.referata.com

Fundies Say the Darndest Things (FSTDT) is a liberal mockery website that is a haven for apostasy, feminism, heresy, homosexual behavior, and the lust of the flesh. The site engages in demonic glorification, gloating, arrogance, pride, and otherwise reprehensible behavior. Unsavory comments allude to desiring carnal relationships, and they have a love affair for Darwinism and they tolerate Taylor Swift the evil harlot succubus. There is no substance on the site, no research, no biblical values, and no other redeeming qualities whatsoever.

James WIlson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

The penis is a liberal organ of Satan that was corrupted during the fall of man. Sexual reproduction is the purpose of the existence of the organ, but Satan has introduced the concepts of having sex for pleasure, as well as Onanism, both of which are wicked abominations unto the Lord.
Much like the vagina, the penis is glorified in Western culture, and many praises, adulations, perverted jokes, and other such abominations exist due to the lack of godliness in wicked modern culture.
"Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost [which is] in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's."- I Corinthians 6:18-20
Liberal "comedian" and former prostitute, and cousin of liberal Senate Minority leader Charles Schumer Amy Schumer has engaged in some ribaldry, speculating the penis size of individuals. Men and women in wicked societies are fixated on the size of the organ, and as God has instructed people, such carnal concerns are lacking in purpose and substance, and due to this godly living is living in which there is no sexual pleasure and therefore such a concern as this is absolutely irrelevant.[1]
Men do many wicked deeds because instead of being led by the Lord, they are led by this evil organ to be doing absolutely abominable deeds that include the sex act, and the even worse act of Onanism.
"And Judah said unto Onan, Go in unto thy brother's wife, and marry her, and raise up seed to thy brother. And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother's wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother. And the thing which he did displeased the Lord: wherefore he slew him also."- Genesis 38:8-10
Onan engaged in sin, and liberals today have even convinced church leaders that Onanism is perfectly normal behavior that causes the relief of stress, and it prevents sexual crime. Nonetheless, it is a selfish act of Satan, and one of the main forces behind it is Satan's own succubus Taylor Swift, who has led men into Onanism and with this method have caused possibly quadrillions of lives to be lost. Men tend to be more wicked than women when it comes to sexual immorality, and Satan is fully aware of this.

James Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Darwinism is a false religion founded by atheist Charles Darwin, because Darwin decided that he wanted to violate God's natural laws and engage in bestiality with a monkey. Darwinism assumes that the world is billions of years old, as is the universe, and that everything came out of a little atom and this expanded into the universe. Life on Earth and all of its intricacies would be absolutely impossible without the Creator, yet atheists assume that Darwin's theory of evolution allowed for people to come from pond slime and that death is "just because" instead of death being the consequence of sin. Romans 6:23 says that " For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Therefore, death simply cannot exist "just because" and it instead is the wages of sin.
Darwinism comes from humanity's desire to feel superior to the God that allows them to keep breathing, and these fools will be so arrogant and haughty even as God has them breathe their last, until they come up and meet the Lord Jesus Christ for Judgement Day. Oddly enough, despite wanting to feel superior to God, Darwinism degrades humans from being made in the image of God to being lowly primates much like chimpanzees and bonobos, and since the latter two engage in homosexual acts, that makes it okay for humans since humans are "just animals" who happen to have rationality and reason unlike chimpanzees and bonobos, but since Darwin preferred to engage in sexual activity with apes, men must also be just like apes, at least according to secular humanists, Marxists, and other forms of Darwinists, including fat atheist loser Penn Jillette.
People are naturally inclined to seek out God, and some of the most haughty and arrogant who claim they are above religion have adopted the false religion of Darwinism. On the Origin of Species is their Bible and it says that "“Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows. There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.”
Some so-called "Christians, such as those in the Roman Catholic Church and the Episcopal Church believe that the gospel of Darwin is accurate, and have made futile attempts to reconcile the Gospel of the Lord with the gospel of Darwin. "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." Genesis 3:19 makes it abundantly clear that death was caused by sin and that sin only occurred after man was brought into the world, and for Darwinism to work there would have had to have been death before Adam to cause humans to come out of pond slime. The world constantly is breaking down, not building up, and for genetics to allow for more well adapted animals is preposterous because there is simply NO such thing as this as there is only decay due to the second law of thermodynamics beginning after the fall of man.

James Wilson #fundie conservatism.referata.com

The breast is an organ that was originally designed by God to allow for female humans and primates (humans are NOT primates, contrary to the fundamental beliefs of Darwinism) to feed milk to their young. This seemingly innocuous organ, much like others, was corrupted by sin. Sin is known for allowing things like lions killing animals to eat them, instead of the animal kingdom living in harmony.
"Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience"- Colossians 3:5-6
"But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away"- Isaiah 64:6
The fall of man is notable because it has caused sin to come into the world, and rampant sin has occupied every last inch of land on the globe. Breasts, which were and still are organs designed to feed infants, have been corrupted by Satan to cause sickening men and particularly apostate women to lust after them as some sort of sexual object. Satan knows this, and Satan therefore spawned the evil succubus Taylor Swift to corrupt young men into the wicked ways of the flesh, and Satan did so by giving Taylor Swift perfectly circular and perky breasts that she flaunts at every possible moment in these low-cut outfits that are wastes of fabric that would have been better used to clothe naked children in Africa than to accommodate the lustful desires of sick minded perverts who subvert the will and the name of God to fit their own agenda.
The breasts of human females, much like thorns in gardens and predatory lions, shows that sin has the power to corrupt the good things that God created.

Elvis is King (James Wilson) #fundie rationalwiki.org

Are you ignorant to the truth? I must say, that you have done nothing but scoff ignorantly at my truthful essay. The Founders were not mere tax evaders, but crusaders for the Republic founded upon the Law presented to man by the Lord Jesus Christ. Crooked Hillary Clinton will have to answer to those four dead in Benghazi, and also have to answer for those emails at some point, because you simply cannot do wrong and get by. It's not how this works. It is a cultural issue, and in the 1950s people were happier and there was not a doubt who the father was and there were no divided holidays where a child didn't know if they were going to mom or dad's for Christmas this year. Those were the days! All of this sex outside of wedlock kids got from trash TV and pornography online is a cryin' disgrace! What Madonna did is pave the way for the evil seductress Taylor Swift to cause men to spiritually stumble in the ways of the lust of the flesh and it is shameful. THIS is not acceptable! See my essay HERE for more information. --Elvis is King (talk) 03:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Elvis is King (James Wilson) #fundie rationalwiki.org

Video games can have tremendous negative effects on children and adolescents. They promote inactivity, and health problems such as obesity. In fact, video game companies such as Nintendo even have warnings on the games that basically say that one should take breaks every hour to stop harm to the eyes, and even seizures due to overexposure. Video games are often paired with a poor diet, which can consist of high-calorie snacks such as potato chips and high-sugar soda such as Mountain Dew. This is very typical in America, especially in cities and suburbs where there is not much for children to do.
It is often safer for parents to keep their children in homes playing these games than going outside due to city crime such as child abuse, gun violence, and bullying. Video games offer a shelter and sanctuary from this. Nonetheless, they cause health problems and can promote anti-social behavior and they may disconnect from parents.
Violent video games such as the Grand Theft Auto series promote violence in young boys, and despite an "M" rating, parents buy these sort of games for young children. These children are exposed to crime, immorality, drug abuse, gun violence, and obscene language at a young age. While the ESRB is doing a good thing placing appropriate ratings on such violent games, parents often do not look at these ratings and will unknowingly buy young children these atrocious titles. One who is aware can surely tremble as a parent buys a child Mortal Kombat for Christmas, and will know that the horrifying content can have a great effect on the well-being of the child! Even Christian churches will have youth group activities where young men will play games like Halo! This ignorance toward game content can promote young men emulating these characters in the violent games they played as children, and has shown links to certain violent behavior promoted recently. The Supreme Court upheld the "free speech" right of an extremely violent and gruesome game as if it were an actual form of speech. Images shown of the game include a beast breaking the body of a woman in half with gore spewing out. Surely one would not want their young child to see this! Nonetheless, this issue is one that will need to be solved by parents to protect the well-being of our children.

Next page