#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

Anon #sexist #transphobia #ableist #crackpot lolcow.farm

ever since I stopped believing in the myth that women are extra empathetic, I keep realizing

>males lack empathy because they're socially retarded

>males don't notice trannies because they're cognitively retarded

>males don't notice certain colors because they're visually retarded (I'm not joking, look it up)

>trannies dress like shit because males are stylistically retarded

>male-gaze media exists because males are creatively retarded

>absurd fetishes like furries turning into cubes exist because males are sexually retarded

>males can't keep their balance, float in water or tank internal damage like us because they're physically retarded

>the XY chromosome is a mutation because males are conceptually retarded

Males are actually retarded. They even have retard strength.

Démocratie Participative #sexist #racist #psycho tastycrousty.rest

[From “Martyr Cédric Jubillar explains his fight against women's cruelty”]

Just like Jonathann Daval, the media have made Cédric Jubillar into a “monster” accused of embodying the barbaric injustice of the white patriarchy

The facts tell us otherwise

France Info[…]
It is not a gratuitous murder, but the fruit of a long psychological torture which the media meticulously avoid reporting

There was a time when France was a country governed by men, therefore by reason. Today, it's nothing more than a shadow of itself, given over to whores and madness[…]It was accepted that women should be handled harshly

Until 1975, the law recognized the legitimate right of a man to kill the whore who stabbed him in the back. This was before the liberal right decided to destroy society for Simone Veil's wishes

In 1810, when France was the center of the world, the French proclaimed that:

In the case of adultery provided for in Article 336, the murder committed by the husband on his wife, as well as on the accomplice, at the moment when he catches them in the act in the marital home, is excusable[…]

This society wouldn't be in its current state—demographically and mentally—if these women were regularly punished as they deserve. I also believe that it is the suppression of women's rightful domestic discipline that leads to uncontrolled outbursts of male violence

Legalizing male violence is the best way to reduce homicides in these kinds of cases. A simple couple of slaps would have kept that whore alive more surely than all the feminist laws in the world[…]
If Arabs insist on imposing Sharia law in our latitudes, it is not to show off but because every day that passes sees vaginal democracy delivering their women to lecherous Negroes

Jim #sexist #psycho blog.reaction.la

[From “Sexcession”]

It is a sexual recession. Man and women are not getting sex and children

It is a sexual secession. Men and women are going separate ways (which results in no one getting sex and children)

Surveys show men and women are both hurting — less sex for everyone, though more women are getting sex than men. Women, however, are disappointed in the sex, because not getting love and investment, just booty calls

Leftists worst hit, libertarians quite badly hit, conservatives doing less badly, reactionaries least affected, though everyone is hurting[…]
When Tinder first appeared, Miss Average was totally wowed to discover that she could get nailed by a six foot six athlete with six pack abs and six figure income

Then she gradually woke up to the fact that she was just another booty call

Men and women on the apps gamified, minimaxed, and optimized their tactics — Which, since the game of players and bitches is a prisoner’s dilemma game, a negative sum game, made the experience on the apps worse for everyone[…]
Women are complaining men are not hitting on them

Why are men not hitting on them?

Some men, primarily leftists, thinks that men pursuing women just oppresses women. It is creepy. It is abuse according to the Duluth model. So the leftist male waits for a relationship to “organically” emerge[…]
One factor deterring men from hitting on women is the Duluth model. “Believe all women”. In practice of course, on matters related to sex and reproduction, women don’t know the truth and do not care[…]
A man wants sex. A woman wants sex with investment, A man wants investment with ownership

In a K selected species, nature and nature’s God wants the transfer of resources from men to women, and from parents to children[…]without patriarchy, without male ownership of a woman’s sexual and reproductive services, without what the Duluth model calls abuse, sexual harassment, sexual assault, and rape, none of that is going to happen

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

To bring it back to humanization/objectification, yes, men often see the “humanized” male icons that females create as derogatory, inaccurate, insulting, and presumptuous. See their common catchphrase: “romance movies are pornography for women”. They can identify false female projections. When they’re in the mood to get on a podium and talk down to someone, they’ll remind women of how ignorant they are.
Humanization, as inaccurate as it is for males, does imply depth, good will, and compassion, so they do not protest a misread when they can capitalize on it. Men want you to think he’s just like a romance novel love interest up until you expect him to act like one. He’ll just string you along for as long as possible.

If men are guilty of excessively objectifying women, women are guilty of excessively humanizing men.

It’s a tragic, ironic inversion.

--

I wish I could be asshole-ish to get off on objectifying men but I just can't. Even my OCs, despite some of them wearing revealing fits get humanized as people and not sex objects.

Jesse Watters #sexist #psycho aol.com

Fox News host Jesse Watters is facing backlash after laughing about American troops becoming "wild animals" around women if they are given testosterone injections

Watters made the comments during a discussion about the possible use of testosterone to help service members dealing with lower endurance and muscle loss

"He says you lose your endurance, muscle mass," Watters said. "So yeah, I want these guys on it, but you know what’s going to happen?"[…]
He then suggested that troops who did not need the treatment would also find a way to take it

"The guys that don’t need it are going to take it. It’s a triple boost, right?" Watters said

The Fox News host then warned women on military bases and in countries visited by US troops to "be careful"

"And then they’re going to get out there and women on base, you guys better be careful," Watters said

"Port calls, women in Asia, you better be careful because these guys are going to be wild animals, and you better watch out"

Watters appeared to laugh as he delivered the remarks, which critics said sounded like a joke about American service members possibly raping or sexually assaulting women

The clip quickly spread across social media, where users slammed Watters for treating the possibility of violence against women as a punchline

"So he's really going to laugh about possible rape in the military and overseas by servicemen," journalist Marty Golingan wrote on X. "There is no bottom for this shit stain"

Anon #ableist #sexist lolcow.farm

The whole love language discourse is male bullshit.

Only the autistic moid mind needs a spec sheet to see where a character’s “love” experience points are allocated, and how each class performs in romantic “matchups”.

The only reason women adopted it is because they have no choice but to converse with men like children if they want to reason with them, otherwise they’re unlikely to be understood at all. Love language is the same as mommy gamifying life lessons with simple rules, small words, and uptalk so her toddler understands it better. No sweetie, it hurts puppies when you kick them, so don’t do it again, or I’ll take away a star! Yes, the puppy likes it when you pet it gently! Good boy, here’s a gold star! Mommy likes it when you give her words of affirmation! Good job, here’s another one! Save up 20 more stars and you’ll get sex!

You can’t rely on men to do the right thing the same way you can’t rely on a toddler to do the right thing. They have no internal drive to care about anything other than gratifying themselves. They can only understand a gratification system with instructions, rewards, and punishments. But men are unfortunately smarter than toddlers, and primarily use their intelligence to flip the rules back on you to get more of what they want.

Anon #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

If machines are going to replace either sex it’s going to be the male sex.

A precedent has already been set for it. Most of the labor men claim to be uniquely theirs has been mechanized already, and what hasn’t been has expanded to include women. If our own history isn’t evidence enough, every organized eusocial species is matriarchal. The majority of them being exclusive female populations, bar a few drones, or rarer instances where sterile males and females produce on equal footing. There is no such thing as a male-led and male-populated eusocial species, which is the system these incels suggest with their robot waifus. It goes against their nature. You can redirect a river before you could reverse it. No one is going to achieve the impossible just to save a bunch of whiny useless faggots. Even if they tried, it would not succeed.
I don’t know why they think the elite class would favor with failmales over anyone. Failmales are the most expendable class of people on the planet, in fact every functional society has to continuously come up with ways to neutralize/discard them. Women are less of a liability and are fully capable of contributing equally if not more.

Robot husbandos are far more likely to replace men than robot waifus are to replace women. It’s more efficient and helps tackle a perpetual problem. Even if the precedent weren’t already set and women were worse off than men by themselves, male sentimentality and intrasexual competition would do the failmales in. Not even men think the perfect world is one populated by lazy, entitled, violent coomer neets and their robo cum receptacles. The surviving elite class of males would just want a population of productive females and robots. As long as men get theirs, they don’t give a fuck about saving anyone else, especially not their inferior competition.

Men should learn to accept their place as inferior and expendable and stop coming up with fantasies where some powerful force upends nature to rescue them from themselves. No one but a failmale cares about the plight of the failmale, and even he only cares about himself. That’s just the way men are. They aren’t each other’s friends.

Jim #sexist #racist #homophobia #pratt blog.reaction.la

[From “The Odyssey”]

Homer’s Odyssey is in large part about women, and about female virtue. And, of course, female wickedness and immorality

Penelope[…]is the archetype of the virtuous wife, Helen[…]and Clytemnestra[…]are archetypes of wicked wives

The Goddess Athena assists Penelope and Odysseus’s son

Calypso and Circe are the wicked seductresses

This extensive representation of women is, of course, profoundly anti feminist, presenting the uncompromising position that women should be chaste and faithful, and that the mistress should not seek to replace the wife

Odysseus represents the classic heroic virtues of prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance, which of course Hollywood cannot stand[…]
Predictably and inevitably, Hollywood’s 2026 Odyssey is an attack upon, and inversion of, Homer’s Odyssey

Which brings me to the armor[…]
The elites on the battlefield were literal knights in shining armor. They wore armor like a King wears his crown. Nolan did not like that

Nolan built actual ancient ships. Why not authentic looking armor? I conjecture this is just hatred of Europe[…]He gives Greek warriors ugly armor because he thinks Europe’s warrior tradition of manly heroism is oppression and injustice[…]
Helen of Troy is race swapped to represent the victims of colonialist and imperialist oppression[…]
As the Lord of the Rings movies depicted the Orcs as less than human, this movie depicts you[…]as less than human. The Greek soldiers oppressing Helen of Troy represent you and me oppressing Africa and Africans, enslaving blacks,and oppressing women and gays

In fact, of course, until the European set foot[…]the Africans lived in mud huts and ate each other, and when colonialism fell back, they resumed eating each other in substantial parts of Africa[…]
Hollywood has been losing money by attacking its audience. It will continue to attack its audience and continue to lose money because it hates its audience more than it loves money

Shirley Heath #wingnut #sexist msn.com

(Talking about Epstein victims)

I, for one, would like to know HOW these women got to be within the Epstein orbit in the first place and what monies, if any, they received. They are forever the victims but it would be nice to have BOTH sides of the story. Some of them were old enough not to get entangled with Epstein etc....

Pete Hegseth #wingnut #quack #sexist edition.cnn.com

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Wednesday that he is rolling out a new screening program for “testosterone deficiency” among troops, calling it necessary to allow them to operate at their “absolute best.”

The screenings will be conducted annually as part of service members’ required medical screenings for those 30 and older, he said. Troops under 30 can volunteer to be tested. In a video on social media, Hegseth said receiving testosterone replacement therapy would be voluntary.

When asked about what conditions Hegseth was looking to address with the new policy, the Pentagon referred to Hegseth’s remarks in the video that talked about keeping troops “strong, resilient and capable” and that the rigors of the modern battlefield demand “maximum psychological and mental readiness.”

Over the past several years, special operations troops — and specifically Navy SEALs — have come under scrutiny for their use of testosterone and similar substances to enhance performance.

The death of a SEAL recruit during training in 2022 led to a discovery of substances in his possession, including testosterone, and revealed far more rampant drug use among the elite program than was previously acknowledged.

A year after the recruit’s death, the Navy said it would begin a drug-testing program to screen for “any hormonal substance, chemically or pharmacologically related to testosterone, that promotes muscle growth.”

Hegseth said his new initiative is “not about artificial enhancement.”

The Pentagon did not respond to questions about what research or academic studies underpinned the move. It also didn’t say if female troops would be able to be screened for lowering estrogen as they entered perimenopause.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

If you really want everyone to get along there needs to be global oppression of men. Once they become second class citizens racism would just fade away. After all, there's no such thing as an all female rape gang.

Jim #fundie #conspiracy #homophobia #racist #sexist blog.reaction.la

[From “The Vatican schisms from Christianity yet again”]

The first time it was tragedy. This time around, it is farce

The first time, the Pope coveted that which is Caesar’s

This time around, men’s assholes[…]
The latest Pope has just excommunicated the Roman Catholic priesthood’s few remaining Christians

The postChristian churches are all rapidly dying, while the Christian churches are rapidly growing

If you attend a postChristian, postModern, church, there is no one left except those with one foot in the grave

Pretty soon the Pope speaking exCathedra will be yet another letterhead owned by Harvard

Which is going to force the remaining Christian priests of the Roman Catholic to adopt the protestant Catholic position, the high Anglican position, that anyone with valid Apostolic succession who is in a proper relationship with God can validly give someone else apostolic succession, analogous to early anarchic period of feudalism, when any knight[…]could give someone else that right[…]
In related news, Hollywood just cast an angry plains ape as Helen of Troy, and displayed the ape looking and acting like an ape in their trailer. Obviously that is not going to entice viewers to go see the movie[…]
The Pope has been performing insults to Christians and Christianity and attacks against Christians and Christianity in the same way Hollywood, Gillette, Budweiser, and Jaguar have been performing insults and attacks against their customers[…]
We have just had a schism in Anglicanism over priestesses, Orthodoxy over Globohomo, and now we have a schism in Roman Catholicism over the latin Mass. The latin mass dispute is actually a lavender mafia versus straight celibates schism[…]High fertility, high fidelity, non buggery, portions of the Church, are SSPX

The papacy is happy to keep the low fertility part[…]as churches, monasteries, and nunneries empty out, this allows them to sell off their real estate and snort coke off the bums of ladyboys

Emilio #sexist #dunning-kruger datasecretslox.com

I think it's worse than that. Niceness is detrimental to selection. Our culture fetishizes rude behavior from men, sanewashed under the label "confidence". Many women will go as far as, e.g., refusing to kiss any man, and disqualify all but those who go ahead and kiss her despite her refusal. Then be surprised that "all men" (who qualify) will also break other boundaries.

(I've been off the market for decades and I'm theorizing on vibes. Hopefully I'm wrong)

gtbreddit1 #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Once again I am fantasizing about killing people to cope with the fact that I can't have sex.

The anger and pain I feel over the fact that I have been denied sex for my entire life and the fact that I didn't get to experience sex once at all in my youth is intolerable. I regularly have episodes where I feel sharp pains in my chest and my arms feel light and numb. The only thing that helps me is fantasizing about killing people. I have extended, elaborate fantasies about killing people. Sometimes they are cartoonish, like I imagine myself as Homelander and I level a city, then threaten to level another if the world doesn't give me hot women to have sex with. Other times they are more grounded, like I imagine punishing society by doing a mass shooting before killing myself on the day I finally decide I have nothing left to lose. In my fantasies, nobody is spared. I target the most vulnerable to incur the maximum degree of suffering on society. These fantasies help me get through particularly painful episodes because I escape into a fictional reality where I feel I have been delivered some measure of justice. There are two aspects to my pain. The first is the injuries I have already suffered. The experience of my life thus far at 31 years of age. My youth has come and gone, and I didn't get to experience sex once. I think about the countless number of cute girls I've known and met and come across throughout my life who I felt attracted to, none of whom felt attraction to me. It feels so gravely unjust to me that everyone else gets to experience mutual sexual interest, but I don't. For some reason I have been designated to be denied that experience. When I think about this, rage and anger wash over me. The second aspect is the fact that there is no light at the end of the tunnel for me. As I get older, I get even uglier. My hair gets thinner, my face sags further off my underdeveloped facial bones.

Angry Harry #sexist angryharry.com

Let's go for serving beer in a bar.
Should men and women get paid the same for serving beer in a bar if they work for the same hours and if they both do the job equally well?
Well, of course, I would say Yes.
But so-called 'equality' fanatics, like the feminists, might well disagree, as they keep drilling down in search for 'inequality'..
They might discover, for example, the following.
1. They might discover that more men than women do this job. And from this they could conclude that 'equality' between men and women has not been achieved.
2. The statistics might show that the women tend to spend more of their money on clothes for the job than do men, and that, therefore, women should be paid more - often by sneaking the money back to them through the tax system.
3. The statistics might show that women take more days off work for childcare reasons or for hormonal problems and so they ought to be compensated in some way for this.
4. The statistics might show that women spend more time mopping up the floor than do the men ...
And so on and on it can go.
My point is that the search for 'equality' can never end, and that in the process of searching for this impossible goal, the stirring up of male hatred is usually a major consequence - and, indeed, in the case of feminists, it is a purposeful aim.
Furthermore, given that 'equality' can never be achieved (even in simple matters to do with pay) the never-ending search for it by the feminists in all sorts of areas will forever involve the stirring up of hatred towards men in all sorts of areas.

Cannabis refugee ; marysunshineredux #sexist #psycho #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

(Cannabis refugee)

if human males were reduced to 10%, women could do something, but then we wouldn’t have to. we wouldn’t be oppressed, and feminism would be obsolete. we could do other things, but doing feminism, and trying to upend male supremacy would be unnecessary. can you imagine?

you are one of the elders who told me about women’s land mary. you saved me so much time.


(Marysunshineredux)

I have been many times to the magical Women’s Lands here in Australia. The few moments of my life that were worth living. 

Anon #sexist #god-complex #crackpot lolcow.farm

Patriarchy is born out of “egalitarianism”, the need of the male to forcefully get what is not his, to allow the inferior to survive and breed.
patriarchy is and has to be framed as the revolt of the inferior, who is inferior because it covets what the superior has, and in a predatory-parasitical fashion abuses the superior’s eusocial and agapic tendency towards forgiveness, generosity, and reciprocity for its own low needs.

if we truly were a blank state spoiled by system of oppression born out of the recursive ripple-like effect of initial differences in physical strength… why female secret service agents, who are stronger than the president, don’t rule the world? how come i enacted harm my pets or my little brother? it’s just a laughable idea, and a malicious one that is used to justify and enact oppression in the first place.
male wolves and killer whales are larger and stronger than their females: not a single one of them has ever been observed raping their female, let alone enacting the thousands of forms of abuse male humans enact…
most first-wave feminists were eugenicists because eugenics is the solution to these problems, even if it makes many people uncomfortable. you’d have to ask yourself why you have been taught your whole life to feel uncomfortable about this subject.

tiffytatortots #sexist #moonbat reddit.com

context: this was in response to a reasonable feminist man.

Oh seriously what a load of crock. First off this has nothing to do with feminism which is literally women being treated and seen as you know fucking human beings. it’s also very clear you’re NOT an ally so GTFO with that shit. The fact you started with “well feminism” shows the lack of good faith in your post and the fact you just want to come at women. Also you don’t get to come to a space for women and blame women for the actions of men. Saying that women are responsible for men being red pilled and misogynistic. That shit has been around since the beginning of time long before women even had a voice. So try again.

Women don’t have to coddle men because they get their feelings hurt for their own damn actions. Women have every right to feel the way we do and say it out loud. You’re lucky we only want equality and not revenge. If men don’t want to be called garbage don’t be garbage. Don’t be Misogynist pricks. It is MENS RESPONSIBILITY to fix this. It’s MENS responsibility to teach young men how to act. This isnt hard. Yet you guys still can’t figure it out and as usual you blame women instead of looking at yourself and doing and being better. Tale as old as time!

Also misandry isn’t a fucking thing either. Women are rightfully reacting to centuries of oppression from men. Women don’t oppress men. Women don’t control men. Women don’t control and regulate men’s bodies. Women don’t enact laws that hurt men. Women didn’t make men property. Women aren’t taking us back to the 1800 in current time.

So instead of sitting here playing the victim, which you’re not, stop and say to yourself hey why do women, feel the way they do about us? What are WE doing that makes women feel unsafe, not want to be around us, and so on. I’m so sick of reading shit like this.

Weaklystupendousimpqueen #sexist tumblr.com

This study largely validates the theory of the case that femcels describe when it comes to the cultural power of lookism and pretty privilege on women’s lives and destroys the rival theory of male incels that lookism primarily affects them. These findings make it extremely clear that lookism impacts the lives of women, NOT moids, and thus the suffering of male incels is, in fact, more or less entirely owed to their sparkling personalities and behaviors, NOT their outward appearance like they disingenuously claim.

The fact is that millenia of male sexual selection (moids largely controlling who fucks who and thus gets to reproduce what sets of genes) has rendered the average woman attractive to her average male counterpart, but not vice versa: most moids are on the ugly side to most women, so women learn to develop comparatively low standards when it comes to the physical attractiveness of their partners. Under male sexual selection, the female sex is not only held to higher standards of beauty, but also more or less her entire social worth is determined by her outward appearance.

EDIT: Look at that, I's made ten posts here. Another life goal achieved!

#bio essentialism#i hate moids

Andrew Wilson #sexist #fundie #psycho complex.com

A far-right Christian podcaster has gone viral after he completely lost his mind when a guest highlighted that his misogynistic worldview is contradicted by his life because his wife has children with three different men.

On a recent episode of the Whatever podcast, The Crucible host Andrew Wilson, who used to go by the name “Big Papa Fascist” and holds Christian Nationalist worldviews, crashed out when a young woman named Charlie pointed out his double standards. “I will never be able to convince you of my worldview, but the reason is not because I’m not a great orator, or I don’t make good points… Charlie, I just think, honestly, you’re too fucking stupid to understand,” said Andrew, as seen in the viral clip below.

“So, Andrew, can I sell you on my worldview? Your wife has three baby daddies and has been married twice before,” said Charlie, who was introduced in the episode as a leftist debater. “And you lick snizz,” he said, interrupting her. “You’re a fucking d*ke, don’t talk shit about my wife, you stupid bitch. Shut your fucking mouth. Shut your stupid bitch mouth.”

Charlie was unable to get out the rest of her point for a brief moment, as Andrew continued to throw homophobic slurs at her. “Is she morally inconsequential in comparison to your ditch licking?” he said, as he repeatedly talked over her and insulted her.

Tutu #sexist #racist kiwifarms.st

Ladies, could we benefit from Man-Hate Threads for different races of men, like "White Man-Hate Thread", "Muslim Man-Hate Thread", "Indian Man-Hate Thread", "Australian Aboriginal Man-Hate Thread", etc.? That way, the racial aspect of male atrocities could be documented more precisely. Some would obviously be more active than others. Just suggesting because this topic causes a lot of disagreement and keeps coming up.
>inb4 "THAT'S TOO MANY HATE THREADS!!!"
Men deserve it

Amargi #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

We all know that men try to achieve immortality (Gyn/Ecology, Great Cosmic Mother) whereas gynocentric women tend to have a more accepting idea of the process of birth, growth, decay and death. I think female identified women also know intuitively when it’s the right time to create life and when it’s the right time to end it, or not create it at all.

IMO because males and females are literally different species (even according to mayl scientists) “EI” would look different for each of them. Or maybe it only applies to females and not at all to males, since they’re sort of like a large virus/parasite/not actually human in the first place. They’re just masquerading.

Amargi #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

I’d like to think that those of us with a radfem consciousness have the ability to Spin/See much further beyond what any male identified patriarch could figure out. I’m thinking of gyn/ecology, how Daly basically “saw” into the past, what wasn’t accessible by a surface-level reading of the media, and how she (and others, like Dworkin, who predicted a coming gynocide in RWW) also Saw into the future. Any male identified male will use whatever info he has access to in service of his peepee, and his peepee is the limit of his universe, what he conceive of, what he can fathom, what he can imagine. Same goes for male identified women – men’s peepees are the limits of their universe, what they can perceive in this world and worlds past and future worlds, what they can fathom, what they can imagine, what they can create, how they can think, how they can act.

Sigrid A #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

Absolutely, the hu(man) revolt against encroaching technology is being pushed in the various algorithms, certainly mine. At this stage, I think the most likely resolution will be a quiet reinstatement of the status quo after this flurry of male outrage. In the testeric chaos, many women will feel compelled to make themselves useful by serving one male side or another, which is imo, the probable reason that males engage in these hype sessions in the first place, whether they are conscious of that or not. As you say, therefore babiez.

Anyone still under the impression that AI/Chatgpt etc, is ‘human’ or intelligent, will probably wake up once the hype has blown over and perhaps a good portion of the population will continue to use AI to summarise wiki articles for them in a soothing voice. While that usage is destructive to critical thinking skills and possibly social skills (though I’m less confident commenting on that), it does not exactly match the imminent threat that would cause men to go to war on the clankers, while women make themselves useful by upholding the human tradition of marriage and babies. These men make me sick. Women’s traditional role is not compatible with freedom. It is compatible at best with material comfort and status.

Also, if any of these men are at the point of crying about robots or have just felt wretched forever ‘for no reason’, I have a tentative theory that they may be naturally miserable because of a subconscious awareness of how dangerous they are to women. Thus, it will probably always remain a great mystery to them. But as far as I’m concerned, that mystery is solved. Women have obvious reasons for being miserable, if they are even at the point of admitting that they do feel miserable. But unfortunately most of them either loudly buy into the pseudo-freedom of material excess, or they sit in sleep mode like robots(!) next to some windbag. And being highly educated does not exclude a woman from being a man’s robot, far from it.

Chuck Pezeshki #racist #dunning-kruger #crackpot #conspiracy #sexist empathy.guru

[From “Immigration as a Psychopathic Boundary Attack”]

Two days ago, there was a videotaped attempted beheading by a Sudanese illegal immigrant in North Belfast[…]
The official census in Northern Ireland is taken in the years 2011, 2021, with the next official census taken in 2031. From 2021 to 2021, though, the population of ostensible asylum seekers from Muslim countries, primarily from Syria and the Sahel (Somalia, Sudan, etc.) has tripled, and continues to increase. Both these areas feature populations that are decidedly non-assimilative[…]
Immigration of this type is never in the interest of the lower class/caste groups that are expected to absorb these different groups[…]Various Collapse Narratives – stories told by elites wanting to drive collapse- are inevitably spun by the press regarding these types of immigrant groups, almost always in a positive light. But the obvious reality is that had those people not been imported into the country, that particular crime would not have occurred[…]
The problem as well, at least in the Northern Ireland situation, is also the differential treatment of women inside Islamic cultures[…]The deeper problem inside the Matrix is not Islam itself. It’s the fact that the Islamic faith pairs perfectly, in its persecution of women, with the desires of white females inside the British and Irish governments to conduct pogroms of manipulative reproductive suppression against other potential white offspring[…]
Front and center were women, armed with the same message, not decrying the violence perpetrator — the Sudanese dude that attempted to saw off his victim’s head

Quite the opposite. These women were attacking alpha males inside their own immediate community[…]
The protective boundary that formerly existed around the original community is shrunk down, at best, to the individual, which is hugely relationally destructive, and detrimental to social cohesion. And that leads to a scale-up of psychopathic behavior

Cannabis Refugee #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

Mothers are Sluts and I am Fucking Sick of Their Bullshit. A Contrarian Mother’s Day Post.

Even in a non-patriarchal context, unless non-technological parthenogenesis has been achieved, creating a pregnancy would necessarily entail procuring sperm, and that normally means that a male somewhere has achieved orgasm which is usually considered pleasing to men. Human reproduction itself in every context may therefore be dependent on (or at least inexorably linked to) male-pleasing.

However, in a patriarchal context, the male-pleasing is even more clear and even more problematic, especially where and if mothers think that they are better than non-mothers, and that they hold a position of legitimate power and authority over anyone and Holy Shit, mothers do think that, don’t they? Mothers think they have a legitimate claim of authority over everyone, including their own children, other people’s children, and importantly over child-free women, who mothers regard as overgrown babies no matter how old or experienced we are. But this claim of authority is not based in anything legitimate, and maternal authority is therefore not a legitimate authority at all.

To wit, in my estimation, under the current paradigm, women become impregnated, and thus become mothers, under the following conditions: by engaging in heterosexual sex, which for females is a sexuality rather defined by pleasing men; through rape, which is also pleasing to men and which many men find indistinguishable from sex; and via patriarchal reproductive technologies, where women let Big Medicine and Western medical doctors torture and experiment on them, where males are known to enjoy torturing females, males, and nonhuman animals and they do it for sport, and have elevated torture to an artform. Women can also become “mothers” by stealing other women’s babies, which hardly cements their claim of legitimate authority over anyone.

Savanna Stone, Brooke Foxworthy and KayElah Gardner #wingnut #sexist #forced-birth #fundie cbc.ca

When Savanna Stone first started publicly sharing her support for U.S. President Donald Trump, she says it was a dealbreaker for some members of her extended family[…]
But what Stone said next was surprising

"I don’t even like Trump anymore, so it’s crazy"[…]
She was invited to be a keynote speaker at the Turning Point USA Women’s Leadership Summit, a three-day gathering held on the first weekend of June in San Antonio, Texas[…]
She says she doesn’t think women should vote, and that the U.S. should adopt a one-vote-per-household election system. Women tend to support more liberal candidates, she argues, so changing the voting system would result in a more Christian and conservative America

"That’s just one of the opinions that I hold, because I think that it would be better for society"[…]
"Now, is that a hill I'm going to die on and run for office and try to complete? No," she said. "That’s Ideal Savanna’s world; that’s not our current world"

Several women at the conference told CBC News that they'd be open to the idea, even if it meant losing their own right to vote — all in the pursuit of a more conservative country

"I think [Stone] has a very big point," said Foxworthy, the stay-at-home mom whose family recently moved to Texas

Foxworthy said she’s voted in every single election since she was 18 years old, and she plans to vote in the midterms coming up this fall. But she is open to the strategy

"If my husband is the head of the household, I am the neck, and we work very cohesively together," she said. "If he was voting on behalf of our household, I would be fine with that"

She said she'd even be comfortable if it meant her daughter lost her right to vote, as well[…]
KayElah Gardner said she'd give up her vote if it meant banning abortion

"I feel like with my mindset, I would want to put my vote in," said the 19-year-old nursing student from San Diego, Calif. "But … I think getting rid of that would actually help women more"

INVERTER #sexist incels.is

As a 29 year old man (basically oldcel status) I'm here to tell you:
Your life will NOT get better whatsoever.
If "foids" don't like you now, they never will. It's deeper than looks - your genetics determine what you are made of. Gravitate towards video games and reflection? No woman wants that. They would rather be beaten to death by a Chad who masters his outside environment rather than be with a nerd who retreats inward.
If you're not popular with people now, you never will be. If you're only popular as a joke, the joke won't be funny 10 year from now. You will be forgotten.
In other words, the circumstances of your birth were wrong but grifters will convince you that you need to pay them $$ to change it. It won't work. And people will laugh at you for "self improving" out of it (even though faggots told you to self improve).
People genuinely hate your genetics. Women will look at you with disgust or pretend to be interested only to turn the tables and report you or get you in trouble somehow because soyciety told them it's empowering.
You will be discriminated against at every job you will ever have. People will throw you under the bus and use you as a negative example to boost their career. No one will care. People will bully and torture you for fun and no one will defend you and you can't defend yourself either.
You will be told 25432 cliches in your life by normies and Chads which you will have to nod along to lest you be labelled ungrateful. You will have to act like what they say is profound and you cannot say anything to challenge this or they will fall apart and hate you.
You will be exposed to hypocrisy every waking minute but you cannot ever expose it or you'll be nailed to the cross metaphorically.
You will be gossipped about by your neighbors and your family, who will avoid you like the plague no matter how much you try to appease them.
I'm not posting this diatribe to depress you but rather to prepare you if you are someone like me.

Henry Makow PhD/Tony/James #sexist #wingnut #fundie #psycho #conspiracy henrymakow.com

1. Men want to have intercourse with every attractive woman they see. They're obsessed with planting the seed
but care little about the onerous moral and financial responsibility of fatherhood. Nature is wise.
If men did consider the consequences, they would never have sex.

2. The Illuminati have undermined heterosexual reproduction in order to replace us with robots. Feminism = depopulation.

3. Generally speaking, female self esteem depends on their value to men. Feminism convinced them that men are the enemy and families are "oppressive."

4. Wives and mothers are loved because of the sacrifices they make for their husbands and children. Do modern women think sex can replace that?
<...>
Comments for "Our Sex Drive is Our Stupidest Instinct"

<Tony>
But we can't get away from it because our owners want us to keep bringing new slaves to replace us in the plantation. That's the whole purpose for it. Generation after generation ad infinitum

<James>
Sex would have been perfect if we had been given a way to "turn off" the sex drive. Origen castrated himself, but that seems a little excessive.

The heart has a mind of its own, but so do the endocrines. IMO, the vast majority of people should never reproduce. Primarily because they're idiots.

I wish to God that my parents had never reproduced. IMO, humanity should have stayed on the land, kept its numbers small, and cared for the soil as though our lives depended on it. Because they do. Unfortunately, humanity has chosen to do the exact opposite and is now paying the price.

Anon #homophobia #sexist lolcow.farm

I know this website is generally pro-lesbian so there is a moral pressure to pretend they have a male equivalent for equality's sake, but you all need to stop this 90s fag "men have an ironclad innate sexuality" nonsense immediately.

Biologically there's no such thing as a man who's "gay" or "straight". They are social self-IDs, not objective responses to stimuli or even real world sexual behaviors. Any man can be conditioned into anything with the correct stimuli + enough time and repetition. Men also get more flexible and sexually "complex" with age, i.e. the longer they've been alive. Before technology the average male would not have encountered such a rapid escalation of sexual stimuli so early, so access to porn provides a truly brutal fast-forwarded model of male sexual hyperfunction beginning in childhood and extending past his reproductive prime.

Before someone mentions conversion therapy and inquires why it doesn't work - it's because coomditioning is a one way street, like time and entropy. You can't genuinely reverse the complexity of conditioned sexual responses to "youthful " vanilla default any more than you can reverse aging - at best it'll be a performance/mimicry. A moid factory reset is currently not possible, you can't put toothpaste back in the tube. Because of this, for example, a coomer who's into tranny zoosadist gloryholes can't be coomed into being vanilla by being repeatedly exposed to LESS distressing and stimulating content, much like you can't revert a fent addict into a codeine addict by having him do a weaker opioid. Even if he does eventually make an effort to stick with it, he will always be thinking about fent.

The relapse rates among nofap coomers are consistent with this reality. There is no way out. It is irreversible damage.

Vox Day #sexist voxday.net

[From “A Passing Thought”]

The ideal role of woman is the cheerleader. The satanic inversion of the cheerleader is the critic

It’s fascinating to observe the way in which women not only fail to understand their power over men, but how they sabotage their own well-being by not only giving in to the inversive role, but doing it without even realizing they are doing so

The key, I think, is to understand that every man who isn’t an optimist with a gambling problem is perfectly aware of the fact that he could fail. It’s very, very easy to not do anything, to not try to succeed. Which is why it is imperative for the women in a man’s life to grasp that not only does a man have no need for a negative voice to balance his moments of optimism and inspiration, but that piling more negativity on top of his natural concerns, fears, and worries all but ensures that he will never take the risks required to level up

There are men who don’t need cheerleaders and who are basically impervious to criticism. I’m one obvious example of that, as my habit of devoting myself to things that literally no one wants or is asking for tends to demonstrate. But even I respond well to cheerleading and bristle at negativity and unhelpful, insubstantial criticism

And since so many people can’t seem to grasp what “unhelpful, insubstantial criticism” is, allow me to explain it to you. Before your criticize anything, ask yourself one question:

1) Is there anything that can be done about it now?

If the answer is no, then keep your mouth shut and say something vaguely polite and positive. Because nothing you say can change what is already done

Anon #ableist #sexist #quack #crackpot #psycho lolcow.farm

I think BPDemons would mostly stop existing without males, too. Most BPDs have been understandably conditioned to feel insecure, because their attachments legitimately are insecure, and/or they were raised by mothers who were conditioned the same way. Obviously after living like that for enough time, you can’t ever go back to normal, but I bet if you disappeared men from earth, BPD would be “cured” within 2 generations.
BPD should be renamed born with penis disorder, because it’s a male patterned operative. Excessive fixation on external validation and acceptance, phobic of rejection, neurotic about maintaining attachments, constant shit testing to ensure security. Basically, describing a small gamete’s default relationship with a large gamete. BPD is just NPD without leverage, and NPD is what scrotes get when you artificially give control off the egg over to the sperm.

Misogyny and patriarchy basically flipped the roles of the sexes and forced women to be dependent on transactional male validation, which can be revoked at any point for any reason, and often is, and usually only manifests in exploitation. Males offload their BPD on women whenever they get the chance, and upgrade themselves to NPD. Remove males and the world will heal in more ways than you can imagine.

Heteropositivity69 #sexist #crackpot tumblr.com

being with a man permanently irrevocably changes a woman, s***n has mind altering capabilities, having kids with an xy changes you forever since your body changes forever and part of his dna is now permanently attached to you, and the higher the number of men they've been with, the less value a woman has on the dating market, impacting her life forever

#no such thing as femdom#no such thing as casual straight sex#feminism#blackpill feminism#blackpill lesbian#daily blackpill#black pill feminism#radblr#radfem#terfblr#terfs do interact#terfs please interact

Verderebb #sexist #psycho twitter.com

Men are not human, women who love and defend men are compromised. Relationships with moids are degenerate. If women were smart they would have reduced the moid pop and domesticated them millenia ago.

It is not feminism that will redeem women but a catastrophe, but unlike what moids believe they will be the victims after centuries of over playing their hand.

David J. Stewart #fundie #crackpot #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

It is a shame that women today no longer want to be mothers and homekeepers as the Bible teaches. The woman is to guide the house, that is, everything that involves the care of her husband, herself and her children. We receive an excellent description of what a mother and wife should strive to attain to in Proverbs 31. Few women can claim likeness to the loyal, virtuous, godly, diligent, hard-working, honest, trustworthy, caring and admirable woman in Proverbs 31. She is worth more than fine gold and rubies (diamonds) according to Proverbs 31:10.
The word “guide” in 1st Timothy 5:14 is the Greek Word oikodespoteo and means “to be the head of (that is, rule) the house.” Notice that the Bible says the man is the head of the wife, not the house. The husband and wife have DIFFERENT roles. The wicked world refuses to recognize this Biblical truth. Instead, the unsaved, heathen world has women entering into the military, politics and the corporate world. The Bible says in 1st Timothy 5:15 that they are turned aside after Satan. To choose a career over motherhood is to turn aside after Satan instead of fulfilling God's will for your life ladies. The choice is yours alone to make. What will it be, money or motherhood? You cannot serve both mammon (wealth) and God. Every decision that we make in life is dictated (controlled) by our master—whether that master be the love of money or our love for the truths of God's Word.

David J. Stewart #fundie #crackpot #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

Many women are guilty of blaspheming the Word of God. The word “sound” in Titus 2:1 means “healthy, uncorrupted, true.” Look carefully at our text Scripture in Titus 2:1 and 4-5. Notice that SOUND DOCTRINE includes teaching ladies to be “obedient to their own husbands.” SOUND DOCTRINE includes teaching women to be “keepers at home.” SOUND DOCTRINE includes being “chaste” and “discreet.” SOUND DOCTRINE teaches women “to love their husbands.” Our churches are flooded with UNsound doctrine these days!
The sinful notion that women should pursue careers and postpone motherhood is blasphemy against the Word of God. To “blaspheme“ here means to “vilify, speak irreverently.” It means that you are placing your will above God's, vilifying His Word as inferior to your own plans and intentions. I heard a TV commercial recently for the military. A man says concerning his sister, “It was awesome to see her transform from a girl in a small town into a soldier.” I think it's sickening! The Bible teaches for women to be “keepers at home.” There's no place in Christianity for hussies, dykes and feminists! You may join a false religion, attend an apostate so-called church and fool yourself into thinking that God is pleased with your sinful ways, but you are only deceiving yourself! American society is becoming increasingly hostile against the Bible, vilifying the truth. The Bible teaches that women are to remain chaste, that is, sexually pure until marriage. This includes men as well. Sexual immorality brings the wrath and judgment of God (Colossians 3:5-6; Jude 1:7). Titus 2:4-5 teaches that women are to be “obedient to their own husbands.” A women who disobeys her husband is blaspheming the Bible. Most people disregard the Bible, rejecting it as man's final authority in all matters of life, faith and morals. Women who file for divorce do not love their husband and are blaspheming the Word of God. The word “discreet” in Titus 2:4-5 means “safe in mind, that is, self-controlled (moderate as to opinion or passion).” Women today are reckless, going from one relationship to another. The Lord gave us His commandments to instruct us how to live, how to treat each other and how to please Him. Most people don't believe the Bible. Most people have believed the lie that men wrote the Bible to control other men, as a form of religious manipulation.

Démocratie Participative #sexist #racist tastycrousty.one

[Translated from “Maurice Benguigui in police custody for “rape” and “sexual assault””]

Maurice Benguigui (“Patrick Bruel”) is in police custody

The vaginal police have caught up with him
France 24[…]
I don't doubt the well-established practices of the chosen people in these kinds of matters, but in this case, we're dealing with women who[…]claim to have been sexually assaulted a quarter of a century ago, or nearly so

Don't tell me that a woman who has been raped, in the truest sense of the word, doesn't have the first instinct to go to the police[…]
Maurice Benguigui is certainly a pushy guy, but a pushy guy isn't a rapist. A pushy guy is simply a man who gets impatient with a temptress

This showbiz Jew has clearly never had to exert himself to find prostitutes. For 40 years, shiksas have been lining up[…]
I tend to think that a woman who voluntarily goes to a man's home shouldn't be able to file a rape complaint unless she can prove she suffered actual physical violence[…]And even then, it's not necessarily conclusive. You wouldn't believe the number of women who demand to be beaten by the men they sleep with[…]
These women who come to complain about Benguigui recently weren't attacked by chance on a street corner. They all met Bruel in a private setting[…]
"He raped me at his place!" isn't really an argument

The same goes for a hotel room[…]
My theory is that each of these women wanted to become his official girlfriend. Dumped by our Israeli nationalist after one night, they want revenge on the Jew

In any case, Bruel won't get away with it easily. He's the kind of former variety star that women love to burn at the stake like the black widows they are by nature

Western feminism has created a monster; this monster is now autonomous and roams in search of men to devour alive

Stephen Miller #sexist #racist #transphobia #wingnut lgbtqnation.com

A White House official continued with attacks on Senate candidate and Texas state Rep. James Talarico’s (D) masculinity on Thursday evening, saying that he’s “transitioning to a woman,” that his blood is soy milk, and that he has less testosterone than Black Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-TX)[…]
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said earlier this week that Talarico is the Democrats’ “first transgender senate candidate.” The DNC’s X account called Miller an “ugly fuck” in response, and Stephen Miller’s wife, Katie Miller, had a public meltdown over the vulgarity of the response

But Miller isn’t letting up. Last night, he went on Fox News and told host Jesse Watters – who has a long history of discussing his personal insecurities with masculinity on air – that Talarico is “clearly transitioning into a female”

“When Talarico goes in for a blood test, when he gets a physical, blood doesn’t come out; instead, soy milk comes out,” Miller said flatly as Watters laughed hysterically. “This man has less testosterone than Jasmine Crockett. It is a mind-boggling choice”

Miller continued, joking that Talarico “doesn’t belong in the Senate but in a cabaret show”[…]
Miller then said that Texans are “some of the toughest, roughest, strongest men and women,” so they will naturally vote for “a real conservative, patriotic, god-fearing, and truly be loved statewide figure” like Paxton instead of “somebody with that much soy” like Talarico

Robert Bortins #fundie #wingnut #sexist #transphobia #conspiracy therobertbshow.substack.com

Texas state Representative James Talarico, now his party’s Senate nominee, recently went viral for referring to women as “neighbors with a uterus.” His phrasing was deliberate, not accidental. He used the term in a church sermon to argue that abortion rights apply to transgender-identifying individuals, claiming that “every one of our neighbors with a uterus became the property of the state.” The phrase has resurfaced as he campaigns statewide, and it deserves far more scrutiny than mockery alone can offer.

Because this is not simply awkward political language. It is a worldview with consequences.
<...>
When we corrupt the words, we corrupt the reasoning. When we corrupt the reasoning, we corrupt the understanding. When we corrupt the understanding, we corrupt the culture.
<...>
“Neighbors with a uterus” is a poisoned phrase. Not because it is merely offensive. Because it is a lie dressed in clinical clothing.
<...>
The word “woman” carries millennia of meaning. It describes a biological reality, a relational identity, a vocational calling, a created dignity. In Genesis 2, God does not simply create a biological complement to Adam. He creates isha, a Hebrew word that specifically denotes a female person in her fullness, her personhood, her distinct identity. The entire created order reflects a binary structure that Scripture describes as “very good.”

“Neighbors with a uterus” strips away every layer of that meaning and reduces a woman to a single anatomical feature, which she might not even currently possess after surgery, illness, or age. As one observer wryly noted, if you have had a hysterectomy, under this framework you are apparently no longer a woman at all.

This is not inclusion. This is erasure with progressive branding.
<...>
When language is turned toward deception rather than truth-telling, it becomes, in his framework, a tool of the Enemy rather than a gift of the Creator. Words matter because creation matters. And creation matters because the Creator matters.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Gym bros will often pressure women to workout to artificially chase and “earn” their affection, but fat ugly scrotes usually inflict cost on women (making her uglier, fatter, more burdened, basically sucking her life force until she is too fatigued to leave) to keep women artificially chasing and “earning” their affection.
Both suffer from normative male retardation, insecurity, and pussy scarcity neuroticism, and will focus on their particular method of mate acquisition and retention strategies, at the woman’s expense.
We need to stop assuming gymbros are demons until proven human, while offering fat ugly scrotes the benefit of the doubt and assuming them to be human until proven demons.

If you assume all men are equally demonic by default, then you would just choose the hot one, if both are already going to drag you to hell. With fat ugly scrotes you are still subjected to hellish treatment, but you also have to deal with a walrus routinely humping over your dried out pussy.
I don’t believe women are actually objectively attracted to fat ugly scrotes, they’re just attracted to the humanity they incorrectly assume they have.
That and the women who have been psyopped into believing male validation really is the highest achievement in life for a woman, and think a fat ugly mould will be grateful to be blessed by her beautiful presence, and that other male-centered women are less likely to poach her source of male validation (which isn’t even true because these validation starved women are all trying to do the same thing).

Hot, mid, and ugly moids all have the same predatory, exploitative approach when it comes to relationships with women, but also the same weaknesses. You are unlikely to get genuine love from any man, but I’d rather abuse and groom a hot moid into being useful company, rather than waste time trying to convince a chimp to love me, especially an ugly one.

Jim #sexist #dunning-kruger #crackpot blog.reaction.la

[From “Women want fried ice”]

Women want what they do not want, and do not want what they do want

So it is fortunate that they do not act in a rational or goal directed manner[…]
Everyone longs for and seeks the ancestral environment of survival and successful reproduction[…]
It is the intention of nature and the will of nature’s God that resources shall be transferred from men to women[…]
No one will plant trees or build on land he does not own, so for the necessary transfer of resources to take place, women must be the property of men, and children must be the property of their mothers and fathers, the boys till they are old enough to become independent, the girls till they are old enough to become the property of their husbands

For a strongly K selected species, male ownership of women has to be part of the system[…]
For women, successful reproduction was accomplished when they were owned by a man, and used as his instrument of reproduction. In the ancestral environment, before agriculture, the stable isotope ratios in the bones indicate that humans lived primarily on meat, including the meat of other predators. We were the apex predator[…]And when I say “humans” were the apex predator, I mean of course, men[…]
Then we switched to agriculture. And when we were switching to agriculture, the sex disparity in reproduction went right up — with far fewer Y chromosome lineages being part of the reproduction pool than mitochondrial lineages. Which indicates that women lived off land that belonged to some man or to the men of a patrilineal clan[…]
If women responded rationally to the incentives of female emancipation, we would probably be in even worse shape than we are, because it is female irrationality that makes it possible to personally unemancipate women[…]
The reason that women do not like the Damsel in Distress trope is that men fantasize about winning righteously and virtuously, while women fantasize about the winners getting hold of them

Robert W Reed #fundie #crackpot #wingnut #sexist biblicaltruth.info

Yoga is a false religion rooted in eastern religion and mysticism. According to Deuteronomy 12:1-4, we are not to borrow a practice from an occult religion (paganism). In Exodus 20:1-4, idolatry is a violation of God's commandments in His Holy Scripture. There is no such thing as Christian yoga; it did not originate in the church; there is no place for yoga in the Christian's life and should never be brought into it. Yoga is satanic worship and diametrically opposed to Christianity. Pragmatism is a new name for an old way of thinking: that is, disobedience to God’s Word. It is a philosophy which says that results are the criteria by which we determine whether something is good or bad. This means that truth is determined by consequences. Pragmatism leads to disobedience and gives a faulty understanding of what constitutes success. There are many Biblical examples of success. There are many examples of pragmatism: may we learn from history (Romans 15:4; I Corinthians 10:1-13). These examples include saints and sinners who succumb to this way of thinking. Abraham and Sarah were great lovers of God and yet struggled with pragmatism at times; for instance, in Genesis 12:10 Abraham’s decision to go into Egypt because of a famine. He put his wife in jeopardy and was reproved by a pagan king. Again, in Genesis 16, both Abraham and Sarah came up with a plan to help God provide the promised seed, impatience led to pragmatism which resulted in disobedience. The principles of God’s Word must dictate our every decision, and success must be determined by our Lord and not by the results. Let us take heed to the examples given to us in the Bible, for even good and godly people can become pragmatic at times which result in serious consequences. Fear God, keep His commandments, follow His ways and stay in fellowship with Him. Pragmatism rejects absolute truth and emphasizes practice over principle. May God help every Christian to abhor this evil and never replace theology with methodology. May we cling to the truth and never cut corners off the gospel of Jesus Christ.

omw_68 #sexist themotte.org

Ultimately, the feminist concept of "objectification" is based on the idea that male desires are illegitimate or unimportant. From the feminist perspective, men are just supposed to serve women without asking for or expecting anything in return. Without having their own independent and legitimate desires.

In other words, the concept of "objectification" is itself rather objectifying.

In any event, "objectification" is like any other feminist concept in that it doesn't stand up to scrutiny. The actual core principles of feminism are (1) more goodies (money, power, status, etc.) for women; and (2) punishment and humiliation for men. Of course, feminists don't like to admit to themselves or others that there's is an ideology of naked selfishness and hate. So they come up with concepts like "objectification" to act as philosophical fig leaves.

Anon #sexist #psycho lolcow.farm

Most of the problems we have in society is because we have a massive male surplus nowadays, which is highly unnatural. In a healthy more natural setting there are 5-10 women for every man. The bulk of low value men are supposed to be culled off before their 25th birthday through wars, fights, accidents, suicide, injuries that turn fatal etc. I don't know why we try to preserve moid lives by offering them modern medicine, draft dodging opportunities or suicide prevention, society would objectively be far better if most men were culled. Low value men offer nothing to society and are a massive financial and societal burden as well as a sexual and safety burden to women and girls. They are literal leeches.

Next page