Everything women were demonised for predicting has happened
Men are infiltrating women’s spaces&sports
Young children are socially transitioned
GNC children are unnecessarily medicalised
Women are harmed as a result of Self ID
“Terf” was just a word for women with foresight
Would you engage in sexual relations with a trans person? If no, please explain why not in the comments. Please RT for coverage.
I would never be with someone that believed mocking another's sex with dress up parody was ok anymore than I think blackface as a hobby or personality traits is acceptable.
Like I don't care how much you "believe" you are that. It's not acceptable to play dress up and parody them. I don't care what your reasons are. It's dehumanizing behavior and I won't allow it in my life or even be associated with anyone that believed it was ok.
(Matt Walsh)
Tennessee will become the first state in the country to make surgical and medical “gender transitions” for children illegal. We will pave the way. This is just the beginning.
The Left is wailing and screaming and threatening to have me arrested and even killed, but they are powerless to stop us. Their threats mean nothing to me and their insults and accusations mean even less. We’re going to see this through. No matter what.
(Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene)
Georgia next!
The 118th Congress must pass the Protect Children’s Innocence Act to make it a felony to perform “gender affirming care” on minors.
If we don’t some states are going to do the opposite of TN and protect genital mutilation of kids before they are old enough to vote.
(Matt Walsh)
Amen. Every Republican in Congress should be speaking out on this issue loudly and consistently. It is not only critically important and morally right, but a winning issue on top of it. Americans do not support castrating children.
“Old fashioned cross dressing” was not OK, and not something we should go back to. When it was “behind closed doors”, wives were still being coerced. Nobody these days would say that hitting your wife is OK as long as you do it quietly and nobody else knows.
Every time you make an exception or a prevarication to show you’re “not transphobic” it’s trans widows and children of transitioners who pay the price.
You might as well say “they should have to put up with it so we don’t have to”.
Also I suspect, the myth of the benign part time domestic cross dresser, was put about by the Beaumont Society to gaslight and trap wives.
For the hard of thinking who are currently attracted to the top tweet here, it’s comparing fetishistic male cross dressing where the wife is forced to participate, as being coercive control on a par with physical abuse. Coercive control is a crime and this is a valid comparison
I suspect that the normal person goes along with LGBT propaganda in schools not because they're intimidated by radical activists, but because they see it as an acceptable way to make the weirdest and ugliest kids feel better about themselves.
once again: gender theory came from queer theory and queer theory came from a bunch of male French intellectuals trying to turn their pedophilia into an academic discipline.
blaming mUh FeMiniStS for this shit is insidious midwittery
all the roads of gender ideology lead back to male sexual degeneracy. all of them. every single one.
all the roads forward through gender ideology inevitably take us to the normalization of male sexual degeneracy. all of them. every single one.
feminists (esp. lesbian feminists) in the 60s and 70s were the only ones sounding the alarm about this shit!
what was the result? the total demonization of feminism until which point it had been sufficiently psyopped by liberal parasitism so as to be completely unrecognizable.
“Non-binary” is not real, valid, or meaningful. It indicates nothing about a person, except buy-in to a shallow faux-spirituality of ego worship w/ daily faith rituals of navel-gazing & breathtaking co-opting of gay rights (no you are not “coming out” as NB — that’s not a thing).
NB is “trans lite,” allowing people to join the gender craze (complete w/ social cred, special attention, legal privileges & oppression points) who otherwise wouldn’t b/c they know themselves well enough to know they don’t have the commitment to fake sex change.
NB is the shallowest faction of genderism — there are no expectations of behavior or appearance that flow from “declaring an NB identity,” yet laws that privilege “gender id” apply to NB as if it is the deepest: eg, it is NB that’s getting legal status as a 3rd sex (M/F/NB).
Non-binary is also the most naked appeal to a transhumanist spirituality of the “gender identity” labels, for the believers who medicalize “being NB” - “NB affirmation” (“nullo” surgeries etc) is a limitless, customized menu of ways to try & transcend (or just deny) being human.
Endless death and rape threats, threats of loss of livelihood, employers targeted, physical harassment, family address posted online with picture of bomb-making manual aren't 'mean comments'. If you don't yet understand what happens to women who stand up on this issue, back off.
Respectfully -- and I sincerely mean respectfully -- you need to fall back and support men like Matt Walsh. You're not built for this conflict. The failure and cowardice of men got us into this mess. Matt is standing up. You need to support him. Men have to fix this.
Respectfully, I've been facing down the Punch-and-Kill-TERFs brigade for a while now and not once have I thought, 'what I really want is to hand this over to a man who thinks feminism is one of the worst things to happen to western civilisation.' 1/4
Like many women on the left, I despair that so many self-proclaimed liberals turn a blind eye to the naked misogyny of the gender identity movement and the threat it poses to the rights of women and girls. Walsh's film undeniably exposed what many leftists are too scared to, 2/4
but a shared belief that women exist as a biological class (and water's wet and the moon's not made of cheese) does not an ally make. I believe women are susceptible to certain harms and have specific needs and that feminism is necessary to secure and protect our rights. 3/4
Walsh believes feminism is 'rotten' and his default appears to be denigrating women with whom he disagrees. He's no more on my side than the 'shut up or we'll bomb you' charmers who cloak their misogyny in a pretty pink and blue flag. 4/4
Is having porn st*rs saved on your phone the 6th pillar of Islam?
Reza Ebrahimi, explains how Persian nationalism is just seething over the fact that they were conquered by Arabs
Many Persian nationalists believe they had spaceships before the Arabs conquered them
No one cares about the Arab conquests at all.
You see a Persian by the name of Abu Tahir Jannabi invaded Mecca, taunted Allah in his holy land, beat pilgrims and taunted them with Quran verses, dumped their bodies in the Zam Zam well, then stole the Kaba and used it as a 🚽.
That's all they care about
You have these power fantasies about how you're gonna "get back" at the Muslims
But Islam has won, cause Muslims have higher birth rates & atheism does not. Look at Turkey, in 100 years kemalism has been undone, same for Iran
It gets even better not only did Abu Tahir completely humiliate Muslim pilgrims. He even found a “Mahdi” in Iran called Al-Esfahani. Turns out he was a Zoroastrian nationalist that burnt Qurans and revitalized praying by holy fires.
Where is Zoroastrianism now? I mean he revitalized it right?
This is the coping and seething that Reza Zia-Ebrahimi talks about, it's a form of escapism
The simple fact is that Islam is evolutionarily the best at surviving, Eric Kaufmann explains here:
This tweet is unavailable
>coping this hard
You have these internet power fantasies, yet where is the evidence of that happening in the real world?
I can say Islam will be one of the most dominant forces in the future, and cite evidence for the world moving in that direction
ED claims that all of the single-sex spaces & activities historically allowed under Title IX were only valid b/c no one was “harmed” by them — but now that “transgender” students feel harmed, sex categories must go. Biden’s Title IX proposal helpfully explains why upholding
sex-based categories can’t continue: “When a person is denied access to education…activities consistent w/ their gender identity, it causes them more than de minimis harm on the basis of sex. Therefore…such treatment generally violates Title IX”. ED is insisting that only the
harms suffered by “transgender” students from sex categories count (“a range of serious dignitary, academic, social, psychological & physical harms”); harms suffered by “cisgender” students from losing single-sex spaces are just “unsubstantiated concerns about privacy & safety”.
In other words, nothing is more important than validating everyone’s “gender identity.” Any downsides or negative consequences to eliminating female-only spaces & activities are just bigoted, cruel overreactions to the harm prevention that really counts: affirming identities.
Of course, ED dodges an obvious question: how, exactly, is a school supposed to “treat everyone according to their gender identity” when gender identity is not defined to, for instance, be limited to cross-sex identification? How shall we avoid “harm” to enbies or gender fluid?
Maybe we’ll see a flood of Title IX complaints & even lawsuits charging schools w/ “gender identity discrimination” for not keeping up w/ neopronouns, & for “only” offering “girl/boy” options for locker rooms etc. That’s not very validating for non-binary or genderqueer students.
It’s also pretty dismissive of reality for ED to frame single-sex spaces/activities always allowed (until now) under Title IX as existing just b/c “no one was harmed,” as though there are no actual *benefits* (esp & mainly for girls & women) to having male-free spaces/activities.
It’s also insulting for ED to frame objections to losing single-sex spaces as concerns of “cisgender” students; how do ED officials know if all students who see value in keeping female-only spaces “identify as cisgender”? ED is forcing everyone into a made-up “trans/cis” binary.
The MRAs are quite in line with the TRAs: men get to do what they want at the expense of women! Yay gender stereotypes! Males are always centered!
The principle tenets of both of them (they are one movement, psst).
💜a TERF can belong to any or no political party
🤍a TERF can be atheist or religious
💚a TERF might or might not be a radical feminist
💜 a TERF fights for the safety and
protection of children and women
🤍a TERF opposes the prefix cis
💚a TERF tells the truth
BE A TERF! ❤️
The current insane language of the Left is that it is "gender-affirming therapy" to tell a little girl that she is a little boy, but "conversion therapy" to tell a little girl that she is a little girl. Which makes a mockery of language, science, and logic.
Trans rights activists - We're women!
Women - No, you're not. Do as you please but women need their language and their spaces, thank you.
Trans rights activists - DIE HORRIBLY YOU HATEFUL BITCHES
Media - Gosh, isn't this debate toxic. Whatever will we do?
Non binary is an assertion of membership in the sacred caste politicians are currently creating for gender identity believers, AGP males, and sexual predators.
https://mobile.twitter.com/lawofgrace/status/1537506400049500161
image
It’s quite astonishing that TRAs don’t understand that it’s they who created the Suicidal Ideation loop in Children. Telling GNC children they were born wrong is bound to have an extremely depressing effect..
There is no "right way" to teach kids about "gender identity" in schools, the same way as there's no right way to teach kids about astrology in schools.
The right thing to do is to simply not teach ANY pseudoscience.
If you truly believe that men and women shouldn't have to be limited by stereotypes, then the concept of gender identity is useless.
(Oilfield Rando)
Normal water pressure has been restored to most of Jackson, Mississippi, officials say
Uh…..so are we gonna talk about how this appears to have been a billion dollar shakedown?
OMG EVERYTHING MUST BE REPLACED THIS IS A DISASTER WE HAVE NO IDEA WHEN THEY’LL HAVE POTABLE WATER AGAIN oh we should have it squared away in a few days
(Joey S)
I'm far too busy celebrating the end of environmental racism to discuss how the environmental racism probably never existed.
The regime of censorship being imposed on the internet – by a consortium of DC Dems, billionaire-funded "disinformation experts," the US Security State, and liberal employees of media corporations – is dangerously intensifying in ways I believe are not adequately understood.
A series of "crises" have been cynically and aggressively exploited to inexorably restrict the range of permitted views, and expand pretexts for online silencing and deplatforming. Trump's election, Russiagate, 1/6, COVID and war in Ukraine all fostered new methods of repression.
During the failed attempt in January to force Spotify to remove Joe Rogan, the country's most popular podcaster – remember that? – I wrote that the current religion of Western liberals in politics and media is censorship: their prime weapon of activism.
But that Rogan failure only strengthened their repressive campaigns. Dems routinely abuse their majoritarian power in DC to explicitly coerce Big Tech silencing of their opponents and dissent. This is *Govt censorship* disguised as corporate autonomy.
There's now an entire new industry, aligned with Dems, to pressure Big Tech to censor. Think tanks and self-proclaimed "disinformation experts" funded by Omidyar, Soros and the US/UK Security State use benign-sounding names to glorify ideological censorship as neutral expertise.
The worst, most vile arm of this regime are the censorship-mad liberal employees of big media corporations. Masquerading as "journalists," they align with the scummiest Dem groups to silence and deplatform.
It is astonishing to watch Dems and their allies in media corporations posture as opponents of "fascism".
It is hard to overstate how much pressure is now brought to bear by liberal censors on these free speech platforms, especially Rumble. Their vendors are threatened. Their hosting companies targeted. They have accounts cancelled and firms refusing to deal with them. It's a regime.
It's not melodrama or hyperbole to say: what we have is a war in the West, a war over whether the internet will be free, over whether dissent will be allowed, over whether we will live in the closed propaganda system our elites claim The Bad Countries™ impose. It's no different.
[Kotaku]
TwitchCon gives zero shits that the pandemic is still happening.
[TheCriticalDrinker]
I know, right? Imagine not expecting people to be constantly terrified of everything.
As a research methodologist the lack of defining terms spins my head..we are asking people for their views on an undefined, fluid and subjective group that can’t even define itself!
Trans is an illusory demographic created by the forced teaming the children of homophobic parents, & those who have fallen victim to the social contagion of gender identity beliefs,
with
adult male AGP fetishists who want to put on a male dominance displays everywhere they go.
Male inclusion in the women’s category excludes women and girls from playing sport.
I am in awe of brave female athletes like
@sharrond62
,
@mara_yamauchi
and
@Martina
, who are fighting for the next generation. I stand with you sisters!
#SaveWomensSports
#NoThankyou
image
A trans activist YouTuber with a 930K subscriber base shared my song in a reaction video. In it, I am accused of focussing solely on transwomen, and not transmen. A gauntlet is thrown down: “How about you say the same points, but to me. What makes me not a man?”
1.
The first and most obvious difference between you and I and the reason you are not a man is that you require synthetic drugs to sustain the simulation that you are a man. Your voice, that facial hair, none of it is naturally induced.
2.
I do not need drugs to have a deep voice or facial hair, my body naturally facilitates it. Yours doesn’t. You have no acquaintance with the flood of natural testosterone during puberty, how it affects behaviour, how a male's life is moulded by it.
3.
Unlike you, I never needed to amputate breasts because as a man I never developed them. Your body does not produce the sperm cell and will never do so. Your body developed to produce the egg cell and thus you will remain female no matter what.
4.
The common cult retort here is to suggest that I must think an infertile woman is not a woman, that those who cannot produce a sex cell are therefore no longer male or female. This is thick.
5.
image
A male dog doesn’t cease being male when its balls are cut off, likewise a female human doesn’t cease being female because she has her ovaries removed.
6.
Your body developed the apparatus to produce the egg cell. You may have had a hysterectomy and an oophorectomy, but you will not replace that with the apparatus needed to produce sperm cells – the cardinal defining characteristic of a man – a characteristic you do not have.
7.
You have a lump of skin affixed to your crotch which was sourced from your arm or thigh. This skin graft is not a penis, it’s a facsimile, a crude construct, a wedge of flesh fastened to your front which ultimately serves to cater only to an aesthetic whim.
8.
It is either limp or requires a gizmo tucked under it that you press to inflate. You think this is a penis? It's a strap-on made of excised flesh. You will thus never experience sexual stimulation as a man, never have an erection, and you will never have sex as a man.
9.
Offended by an old movie/TV show? Don't fucking watch it.
Offended by the opinions of some dumb celeb? Don't fucking listen to them.
Offended by a book? Don't fucking read it.
Your choice. But don't take away the rights of others to make that same choice.
#FuckCancelCulture
Kristan Hawkins: This is great news!!
Children deserve to be protected from abortion violence no matter who their fathers are.
https://apnews.com/article/abortion-health-legislature-south-carolina-government-and-politics-6498221b8d4d48dde993d3a5a9deb1b7
Tech Witch: The cruelty is the point. Isn't it, Kristan? You're disgusting
fanster: Kristan: "Rapists should have more rights than their victims"
Alex Kobylarz: No one said that cut the crap we are for punishing the father. But the unborn baby is innocent and derseves the right to life protected by law I stand by miss Hawkins.
fanster: The victim should not be forced to have a baby.
Alex Kobylarz: What did the innocent baby do nothing . Jail the father but the baby has the right to life regardless of how they were conceived.
fanster: Because the victim has sentience and personhood. And it's wrong to make them go through a pregnancy they didn't consent to. There is potential for life in the early stages of pregnancy, but it's not the same as a developed human.
fanster: If there was a fire at an IVF lab and there were 10 embryos on one side of the building and 1 infant at the other, and you only had time to save either, you would save the infant because you know there's a fundamental difference between the two.
Alex Kobylarz: And an emybro is still a stage of life it is the beginning stage of life of an unborn baby so I protect and defend all life born or unborn.
fanster: No, you don't. Banning abortions means more women will die. But you don't care about that.
fanster: If you care so much about the unborn, I assume you also support comprehensive sex-ed and access to contraceptives, which are effective in reducing unwanted pregnancies?
Alex Kobylarz: It’s not about brith control but self control
(Elon Musk)
We are simultaneously being told that gender differences do not exist and that genders are so profoundly different that irreversible surgery is the only option.
Perhaps someone wiser than me can explain this dichotomy.
(@MeganFoxWriter)
There was a time when humanity realized girls could climb trees and want short hair and just be "tomboys". Many of them grew up to be fabulous mothers who showed their daughters how to be different. But now we cut their breasts off. Not exactly progress.
(@DrDebraSoh)
I wrote an entire book about gender ideology and its contradictions.
These ideas can’t be reconciled, which reflects how poorly thought out they are.
(@ultradesign_be)
It's meant to be as complex and confusing as it can be, otherwise it could part of a rational discussion. It's emotional coercion; "if you don't agree with this statement you must be against the people whose this statement is about and therefor an enemy and a heartless monster".
(@JamesEsses)
The 3 biggest inconsistencies of gender ideology:
1. Insisting on respect for pronouns but imposing the label ‘cis’ on others.
2. Saying feelings are all that count but encouraging modification of the body.
3. Rejecting pathology but demanding access to medication and surgery.
(@_BarringtonII)
Yes Elon. Because the losers, degenerates, and outcasts figured out that they can bully the masses into acquiescing to their behaviors under the guise of acceptance, inclusion, and equality. Now, the bar we’ve set as a society in civility is in hell, and it’s a free-for-all.
Tennessee’s total abortion ban will begin Thursday. It contains no exceptions!!!
Not in cases of rape. Not in cases of child sexual abuse. Not to save the life of the mother.
Praise God.
(ZUBY)
Gay sex is illegal in Kenya and President-elect @WilliamsRuto previously said “we have no room for gays.” Ruto tells me “we respect everybody,” but adds “this is not a big issue for the people of Kenya” and President Kenyatta was “spot on” to say homosexuality “is not agreeable.”
The average Western journalist has no idea how conservative the average African is. And it leads to foolishness like this.
Man wants to talk about jobs, infrastructure and poverty... and she wants to talk about butt sex.
Every time they interview African leaders, they ask them these questions. In order to try to demonise them to Western audiences.
It's an attempt at ideological colonisation and subversion.
They don't ask Middle Eastern leaders such questions.
(Wilfred Reilly)
Actually "respecting other advanced cultures" - Chinese, Arab, Nigerian, Brahmin- would be a death-knell for Western leftism.
The in-practice "multi-cultural" response to this problem is to focus curricula, etc totally on modern Western issues but use multi-colored presenters.
(Obianuju Ekeocha)
LEAVE US ALONE!!!! You keep setting traps for African leaders to try to villainize them.
(LostTribeRoots)
The look on his face speaks volumes here. Trying real hard to not roll his eyes. We need to be making this face more in the US.
(Js)
Africa has real problems not imagined ones.
and the west is creating real social problems for itself daily
(Very Swell Nice Guy)
Everyone outside of the west does not want western social values, they want economic prosperity but not broken family units
Hell, half the West doesn't want Western social values, they want economic prosperity and intact families too!
(Daddy yo)
What is it with America and imposition of thier culture on people
Cant you just accept everyone has a way of life and its not all like yours
It's not even the culture in America. The LGBTQ community just have a very strong lobby...
sexuality is not about genitals, it’s about personality and appearance.
AHAHAHAHAH! 😂😂No. If I like a woman I like her because she’s a woman. If she had a dick or a frankengina and had the best personality in the world it would still be a man pretending to be a woman and I would still be like NOPE. You’re a man. It’s pretty straightforward.
[Context: he’s criticizing Keffals efforts to shut KiwiFarms down.]
This looks like some insane personal crusade. Someone with a platform should have a degree of responsibility into the type of stuff they post.
I didn’t affirm my daughter, I removed her from the contagion. Within months she pulled what I called a “sees and desist” — she saw the truth and left the cult. Over a year later, she’s thriving more than she ever was when involved in gender craze. #YoungGCWomenUnite
image
Crazy how many people are mad I didn’t let my daughter go down a path toward mutilation. Maybe if studies showed transition actually improved mental health, I’d consider it, but a lot of you are proving that living your trans life didn’t make you any less of a miserable person.
[...]
Weird, many of you are claiming I abused my child by questioning her trans identity, yet you’re also referring to her as “she” “her” and “daughter”. It’s almost like you don’t care about my child as much as I do, or her identity, you’re just miserable, pathetic people. Stay mad.
[...]
We have an incredible homeschool coalition where I live. Anna is back in public school because I do trust her now, she’s the high school’s renowned TERF apparently. But my younger two, 2 and 4, I doubt we do public school at all.
[...]
Removing my child from social media meant she had to interact with friends in real life. It literally gave her more human connection. And she and I are closer than ever before.
[...]
Remove her from social media. Stick to it. That was the biggest thing for us, being removed from the social contagion gave her time to reflect on who she is without being influenced.
[...]
ALWAYS snoop. Removing our children from social media is a good start, to keep them from the predators and grøømers who would go behind our backs and tell our children lies. I’m so sorry about your experience 😔 I hope your daughter comes back to you safely.
[...]
I removed her from all social media. I purchased monitoring apps to block certain websites from her phone, and would receive dmail@alerts if certain words were flagged in her searches or texts. I also would not let her spend time with any friends whose parents o didn’t trust.
[...]
She turns 16 in less than two weeks. She survived not being affirmed. I’m so happy this gives others hope. We can’t let our children@hold us hostage with threats. Their infantile threats only prove we need to parent them more than ever. They’ll be ok.
The basis of the “what is a woman ” argument is the mistaken premise that a woman is an “idea” or a “feeling”. So anyone can have that feeling and thus be a woman. Nope. A woman is an adult human female, the member of the human species responsible for production of Ova.
Whether they currently produce them or not is neither here nor there. A legless horse is still a horse. Dissociating words from their meanings is a trick used to confuse and deceive, with far reaching ramifications. What is a child? A child is a young human person.
Except some will say no, it’s an identity, a feeling, an idea, a concept. A grown man can then say he identifies as a child, and he wants to play with children and have a childhood. Does that sound ludicrous? It should. But that is where this bullshit semantic game is heading.
Let me introduce you to Dr. Scott Mosser, who cuts the breasts off of adolescent girls. Many surgeons across the country will and do inflict “top surgery” on minors. Mosser assures us that he follows very “strict” guidelines before performing double mastectomies on children.
Mosser also offers “non-binary” services for patients who want to be neither male nor female.
Mosser assures his patients that regret after surgery is “exceptionally rare.” He cannot possibly know this because we‘ve never done these sorts of things to this many children before. How many 40 year olds are walking around today who had cosmetic mastectomies at 16? Almost none
When the media tries to “debunk” the claim that doctors are mutilating kids, they simply ignore top surgery altogether. They ignore it because it is undeniable that this is happening to children. It’s also totally indefensible. They know that too.
Everything I’ve posted here is factually accurate and publicly available on Mosser’s website. I didn’t use any information that he did not publish himself. That won’t stop the left from calling this “misinformation,” of course, but I want to state it for the record anyway.
Of course the game is completely rigged. The Left claims that these sorts of things aren't being done to children but if you cite a specific example to disprove that claim, they'll accuse you of terrorism and incitement.
Women, children & LGB's have sex based rights. If, as is being asked we defer to gender, then these rights are removed. By removing sex based rights safeguarding of Women, children & LGB's are also removed. Simple! If you don't see this as a problem, YOU are part of the problem!
If a black woman wasn't black, she'd still be a woman.
If a disabled woman wasn't disabled, she'd still be a woman.
If a genderqueer polyromantic demisexual woman wasn't... all that bullshit, she'd still be a woman.
If a transgender woman wasn't transgender, she'd be a MAN, baby.
Blacks paid for supporting Dems-they got rid of fathers in households! Now their kids run amok.
Yes, the patriarchy is rubbing its hands in glee that I'm defending trans women, whom it notoriously loves sooooooo much. Look who your side is allying itself with for five minutes! Republicans! Toreys! Conversion therapy advocates! The Heritage Foundation! Fox News!
Look what your ideology demands; enforced labels, controlled language, a curb on free speech, scapegoating, punishing & prohibiting of certain groups, medical experimentation on children, denouncement of scientific fact, projecting propaganda, censoring opponents & book burning.
A🧵on the great unanswered questions of our time. You all know them, you’ve all asked them and all you get in reply are circular definitions, insults or tumbleweed.
1. What rights do trans people currently not have?
2. Why is it ok to identify into a sex but not a race/ethnicity/disability?
3. Why is standing up for women’s rights transphobic?
4. Why do you care about preferred pronouns when they’re used if you are elsewhere?
5. If trans women are women what they transitioning from?
6. If trans women are women why do they need to transition?
7. Where are all the middle aged women transitioning?
8. If trans men are men, why are they not dominating men’s sports?
9. If being trans is not a medical condition, why do you need medical interventions?
10.How can you be both trans and non-binary?
11.Why does it take surgery and drugs to be your true authentic self?
12.Where are the statistics showing trans people are attacked at a greater rate than other groups of people?
13.Why are trans women’s fears of male violence in single sex spaces justified but women’s fears of male violence in single sex spaces means they are hateful bigots?
14.Why is it not ok to misgender a trans person but fine to call someone ‘cis’ when they’ve asked you not to?
15.If gender is a social construct and anyone can dress/behave however they want, why the need for transition?
16.If sex isn’t real, why transition?
17.Why do feelings trump material reality?
18.Do you believe that adult male born people with a penis should be able to undress in female communal changing rooms with women and girls?
Feel free to add your own.
SCOOP: The Springfield, Missouri public school district held a training program forcing teachers to identify their racial and sexual “privilege,” promoting identities such as “pansexual” and “polyamorous,” and warning that “misgendering a trans person is an act of violence.”
The training program began with a “land acknowledgement,” led by “chief equity and diversity officer, Yvania Garcia-Pusateri, asking teachers to “acknowledge the dark history and violence” of European settlers and to commit to “social justice work.”
Next, the district asked teachers to identify their racial and sexual “privilege” and consider how they contribute to “cycles of oppression.” This system leads oppressors—i.e., white male heterosexuals—to feel “anger, dehumanization, guilt, collusion, ignorance, self-hatred.”
The program followed the basic principles of radical gender theory: society has created a “heteronormative” system that is inherently oppressive. The goal is to subvert this system and affirm identities such as “trans,” “nonbinary,” “polyamorous,” and “pansexual.”
Administrators shared a video featuring “genderqueer” and “nonbinary” children, which claimed that some children “don’t have a gender” and that “misgendering a trans person is an act of violence.”
“My identity, although you can’t see it, still needs to be validated.”
At Parkview High School, one of the district’s “equity champions” held another training telling teachers that they must “acknowledge [their] privileges” and “lean into [their] discomfort” as part of their “LGBTQ+ 101” education.
The trainer instructed teachers to “try not to use gender-specific terms in class,” to use “they/them” pronouns for nonbinary children, and to “add your pronouns to [their] email signature.”
“For some folks, pronouns are non-negotiable.”
Fortunately @kimmiehermann at Southeastern Legal Foundation has filed a lawsuit against the district and Attorney General @Eric_Schmitt has put the district under state investigation. Voters and public officials should immediately shut this program down.
If a man stood outside a woman’s restroom and demanded access or else he would kill himself, it’d be seen as manipulative and abusive. But if he claims to be a woman, women are told to capitulate else his death be on their hands.
Spoiler: It’s STILL manipulative and abusive.
Straight, white males deserve a Pride Month.
The Left won’t acknowledge it, but that group might just be the most discriminated group in America today.
[Context for those who don’t know: Andrew Tate is an internet personality known for his extreme misogyny, along with allegations of rape and human trafficking.]
Banning Andrew Tate is dumb. Ideas should be challenged and if he spreads misinformation it should be countered in the public sphere.
If trans people existed through all of history and just sat back and watched what women went through & never bothered raising their heads above the parapet until we fought for and won our own rights, that narrative is one of abject cowardice and not worthy of respect.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
image
Trans activism demands in a nutshell:
➡️male bodied people can access ALL women's spaces & undress in front of girls/women
➡️Male bodied sex offenders can access female victims in prison
➡️Gay, GNC, autistic children who are gender questioning to be chemically sterilised.
It seems there needs to be some honesty here from you and those who don’t consider trans women to be women that you wish to continue to call them men. Because if not the case then there is a very small group of women who were born with a penis and in some cases retain it.
I used to think that it was "kind" to refer to people how they wished. But now we have male rapists in women's jails, male athletes in women's sports, lesbians told they're bigots if they won't sleep with males, etc. So, yes, I am going to insist on saying who people actually are
This hasn't happened here.
Social transition isn't a harmless act. If a school forces staff and pupils to call a male pupil 'she', it's then much more difficult to make the case that that pupil should not be able to access changing rooms set aside for female students. They count.
What makes Ministers in this Government get up in the morning & think: “what hateful & hurtful thing can I say today about a very vulnerable minority of young people?” Replace “trans” with “black” or “gay” & you get my drift. We’re back to Section 28, but this is worse.
image
1980’s section 28 - homoSEXuality (same sex attraction) must not be spoken of
2020’s - transgender agenda - same SEX attraction (homosexuality) must not be spoken of
What exactly is the difference ?
