Bloodthirsty, psychopathic and serial-killer-esque quotes
(Response to a tweet condemning J.K. Rowling’s blatantly open transphobia regarding trans women in the women’s bathrooms)
Good.
Trans people are mentally ill.
Transphobia is a natural and fair reaction to a cancerous ideology that needs to be stamped out.
All you lot should be rounded up and put in prison, you're fucking terrorists.
From the October 6, 2026, edition of The State of Freedom, streamed on Rumble
CHRIS ALEXANDER (CO-HOST): What about Jack Smith, Joe? What about Jack Smith?
JOE HOFT (THE GATEWAY PUNDIT): What a — he should be hung, don't you think? I mean, he's so rotten. It's so bad
DANIELLE WALKER (CO-HOST): Yeah
HOFT: He's rotten. He's been doing — you know, he — there was a senator years ago that he took down. Do you remember that? It was under Obama. I think Obama's first year, there was a Republican senator out of Alaska they made a bunch of lies about. He eventually, I think, got either kicked out or resigned, and that gave Obama a 60-40 Senate, or he could push through with whatever he wanted. And Jack Smith was behind that takedown, and the guy died. And then he — they found out, no, he didn't do anything wrong
ALEXANDER: Yeah
HOFT: And that was Jack Smith so —
WALKER: How evil. How evil
. A young woman from Norway, 24-year-old Marte Deborah Dalelv, naively thought she could do the same in Dubai, but was shocked to learn that what passes for "rape" in Norway is criminal conduct for women in Dubai. The courts in Dubai didn't agree that her story constitutes rape, and sentenced her instead to 16 months in prison for fornication and drinking alcohol.
….
One side of a story is almost never accurate, and here we only have the woman's story quoted. Even so, Marte's story does not add up to rape even if she is telling nothing but the truth. She describes only token resistance in going to the man's hotel room before willingly going to bed with him, and then blacks out and implies no resistance at all until she has her regrets the next morning as she wakes up naked. There is no violence; only drunkenness and regret. The case could hardly be more stereotypical of regretted drunken sex redefined in retrospect as rape thanks to feminist rape law -- minus the feminist law. The accused rapist is just a normal, persistent man, behaving like I have done many times and any of us would. Only with perverse, misandristic laws can this be rape, and I am pleased that Dubai rejects the hateful precepts of feminist rape law that Marte thought she could get away with.
…
Marte Deborah Dalelv was at worst taken advantage of while drunk and careless, like any normal man would do, but she was not raped. I am happy that she is now experiencing a backlash for her hateful attitude that she is entitled to have men imprisoned for our normal male sexuality.
http://www.abcactionnews.com/stories/2004/06/040622teacher.shtml
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5299732
Recently in Florida a 23 year old female teacher has been accused of having sex with a 14 year old boy
Im not sure how people got this reversed, but she was not the one in the position of power; he was. As soon as they had sex, he had the power over her, not the other way around. He, literally, was fucking authority. He had her career in his hands at the same time he had other things.
What power had she over him? What, give him an F in reading class? 14 year olds arent stupid, the kid had to be aware that she had far more to lose than he did. No, the power was in his hands. If anything, I think a good case could be made that this is an issue of a male taking advantage of a female when she was in an emotionally delicate state. Show me a 14 year old who is stupid enough to think a junior-high or high-school teacher can have a lasting bad effect on them enough to be coerced into having sex and Ill show you a 14 year old in 5th grade.
Hell, [bshes only 23, barely out of childhood herself. The older I get, the less of a difference I see between a 23 year old and a 14 year old. Kids are kids.
And yes, I for one recently have a daughter. I believe, and will tell her so, that if something feels good, and she think she wants to try it, to go for it. Thats how one learns. If she doesntlike it, great. If she does, great. But then Im raising a human being, not a unit.
Who the hell cares if some people have sex a year ealier than the norm? So the hell what? Not being like everyone else is something to be proud of, not worried about.
How do you define “child molester”?
Someone who makes sexual advances toward a youth who is unwilling or unable to consent. (“Consent” being defined according to common sense, rather than any legal age limits.)
(Looks like I’ve been misspelling molester. Oh, how far I’ve fallen since I was a spelling bee champion…)
So basically, nothing is abuse unless the child says “no”?
Or unless he’s incapacitated or drugged, or so ignorant about sex that his consent is meaningless. Same standard as I’d apply to anyone else, regardless of age
So, you are proposing a legal limit at around age 12?
No. I do not support legal age restrictions.
What you propose is reckless endangerment of kids at the hands of abusers, rapists, and molesters in the name of some cheap kicks for a few.
Nonsense. What I propose is allowing minors to make their own decisions about their own bodies. I do not condone abuse or coercion.
I live in Minnesota, and I can assure you that the majority of people in Minnesota, outside of the liberal cesspool in Minneapolis/St. Paul feel the same way, and would love for the federal government to come here and clean up this mess of a state. Literally nothing is done on the up and up here.
(Trump) is 100% correct in his assessment. We must fight back against foreign invaders who do not belong in this country.
You can’t celebrate Charlie Kirk’s murder and be against public executions.
So many people across multiple platforms that are up in arms about this possible public execution are the same people who praised Kirk’s assassination. That is a tacit admission that you agree with public executions. I’m personally angry this sumbag wasn’t shot twenty minutes after they caught him. I’m tired of feeding and housing people for decades when they are obviously guilty. Same with Lindsey Clancy. As soon as she confessed she had done it, insanity or no, she should’ve been executed the same week. This country will not be sane again until the law actually functions like it should.
Alright so let's put this into terms you can understand.
A guy could walk into the party, take a date rape pill himself, lay down buck-naked and spread-eagle on a bed before he passes out and still be completely 0% at fault.
Better? Because both are true, it doesn't mean they weren't stupid actions, but when someone is raped it is due to the aggressive actions of another person NOT their own. Doesn't matter the gender, or the situation.
Na-ah. Millions of people have aggressive sex every day. It is our biology. It is just some stupid attention whore cunts learned how to gain notoriety in some modern societies while doing so.So, in your opinion, what is required for something not to be treated "rape"? Signed waiver?
Should next time I come home late and see my wife sleeping in some sexy wear be afraid of touching her because she clearly didn't gave me any consent yet?
That is a FANTASY, and it is NOT rape by any means. Men have the fantasy too.
The only difference between "fantasy" and "rape" is whatever she liked her fucker or not. And that's royally fucked up part.
Originally Posted by Crissi
"Consent need not be expressed, and may be implied from the context and from the relationship of the parties, but the absence of objection does not of itself constitute consent." Wikipedia[Url=https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/1276650-CNN-grieves-that-guilty-verdict-ruined-%E2%80%98promising%E2%80%99-lives-of-Steubenville-rapists?p=20548464&viewfull=1#post20548464]Being at underage party with alcohol drinks is a "there's very likely there will be sex" situation in my book. Going there instead of staying away is pretty much implied consent. And please, don't spout nonsense "she couldn't know that!" Pretty much every girl know that at about 13 yo nowadays if not sooner.
The truth is that the Jane Doe supporters wish she was assaulted more than wishing she was not, which proves their compassion is not out of care for her but just performative.
There has been so much back and forth regarding the Cornell 7 allegations. The side which is supportive of Jane Doe loves to preach about believing her, and the other side is quite skeptical and/or calling it a false accusation. The odd thing is people care more about being right on the internet than about her well being, and are therefore rooting for her to have been raped, and would be disappointed if she wasn’t. This proves these people don’t care about her but are just being performative so they can shout “I am Jane Doe” for attention and hating on men, similar to picking the bear.
What's always bothered me was that the preconcieved stereotypical predator often overlaps the streotypical adult gamer and comic book nerd. Being an adult gamer, it annoys me.
The bigger problem is that they are acting like pedosexuality is 'abnormal'. Frankly, I am a pedosexual and have found that most men, when I ask them, would sleep with an underage girl if they could get away with it and most women would do the same with underage boys, because they are 'easier to control' as one woman told me! The only thing 'abnormal' about pedosexuals is that we are HONEST about our sexuality and see nothing wrong with it, just like homosexuals who used to be called 'abnormal' because they didn't see anything and don't see anything wrong with their sexuality. I have not see ONE child who was not dragged into the social workers office where I used to work by their parents or some other asswipe who had 'moral outrage' thinking that this child was sexually active more than them.... which is what it usually amounts to, jealousy towards the child in question. I also have to say that most of the 'harm' from underage sexual encounters come from the reaction of society to them. There were three girls in my high school class who had been 'sexually abused' by their father, and had NO problems with it until their mothers found out about it and made a big fuss about it, getting their fathers put into prison. Then the girls had problems, because they didn't really want their father put into prison and felt guilt over that. They finally helped get their father out of prison by recanting their testimony, telling what their mothers had threatened them with (killing them, in two cases), and having their mothers put into prison because their mothers were abusing them physically and emotionally. It is just past time to stop with this 'sexual morality' BS and realize that there is no such thing as a sexual act that is 'wrong' unless you are PHYSICALLY FORCING SOMEONE INTO IT OR THREATENING THEM WITH PHYSICALLY FORCING THEM INTO IT. There is no such thing as coercion by keeping something from someone (unless it's food or shelter).
I'm perfectly willing to admit being attracted to minors, and I challenge anyone who thinks that makes me the least bit perverted, or "sick" (I'm 25, btw). When girls sexually mature around 12-14, calling a 16 year old a "child" and trying to stigmatize the idea of being sexually attracted to her is rather dubious, to say the least. I am not, however, attracted to actual children...
Originally posted by tpg0007:
Maybe we should rethink the definition of "children."
In short, this.
------
I understand parents dislike the idea of their girls having relationships with older men, and let's be honest, parents tend to get apoplectic whenever the sexuality of their daughters (especially their daughters) is concerned, regardless of the guy's age. Fine. I'm not a parent, but I understand being protective. On the other hand, maintaining that a 15 or 16 year old girl, while no doubt somewhat immature, is incapable of having consensual sex, is nonsense.
So, Pamel, in your story, there's difficulty, because the man was already in a position of power, authority, and influence over the girl, so that may complicate things. How can anyone tell the degree to which she was coerced by him? It may be impossible, even for her, to know. I'm not sure the best way to deal with those cases. Keep in mind, however, that there's certainly an amount of coercion in every human interaction, especially where sex is concerned. So, it's muddy. I am of the opinion, however, that it's entirely possible for a 30 year old and a 15 year old to have a free, non-coercive, consensual sexual relationship. And if they do, the 30 year old shouldn't be demonized or called a pervert. It just might be tricky to tell whether the relationship is, in fact, non-coercive. I'll grant you that. Let's be clear, though (just as an aside). Even if it is, it doesn't make the 30 year old a pervert. It may make him an asshole and a bully, but there's nothing perverted (or paedophilic) about being attracted to a sexually mature individual, regardless of the age difference involved.
CADdie: “I lost my virginity at age 18 to a 14 year old girl who was more mature and experienced than me, and she never turned out to be a mental wreck later.
If a 14 year old girl would want to have sex with me today, I'd probably do it.”
Squishyfish”I should just point out that there exist cultures in which parents arrange for their children to have sex with older members of the community, as part of a rite of passage into adulthood.
I would assume that if sex with an older person was innately harmful, these cultures would have self-destructed long ago.”
Chickenlegs:”What pisses me off the most is when you get these teens, say 15 or 16, and they go around sleeping with as many men as they feel like it. Then they sleep with some guy that is like 21 and people point to the guy like he did something wrong. Hey, I say if a teenager is going around getting guys to sleep with em then put the blame where it belongs, right on the teen. None of this, "Oh, he is 21, he should know better." Ill tell you what he knows, he knows that an attractive young energetic girl with boobs wants to sleep with him. Thats what he knows.”
The arguements for an "Age of consent" or regulation of sexual relations are put in place to protect the kids (Minors, etc) but what if you have a truely curious under age person who is interested in exploring their sexuality with someone older? People tend to assume that doing so with someone in your age group is for the best (After all, doing so with someone older is a crime!) but from a dispassionate point of view, is it really?
An older, more expirienced person is more likely to use a condom, as well as more likely to use it correctly. They're more likely to use lube and take precautions. Do you honestly think it is better for a gay boy to have his first encounter where there is tearing of the tissues? Likewise for a girl.
I personally agree that an adult should never have sex with a minor they have sway over (Preist, teacher, etc) but I also think the law as it stands does a disservice to "advanced" minors who just want to expiriment with more expirienced people. Or, horror of horrors, actually falls in love with an older person! (I know in highschool I lusted after a certain biology teacher. She wasn't MY teacher, but dizamn was she cute.)
Many of the arguements against are typical reactionary knee-jerk bullshit. How often do you hear "But it is bad for the kids!" or "It warps their little minds!" without anything else to back it up? A thinking man might say "Well, the female's vaginal tract doesn't fully mature until 18-21, making it much more prone to damage before that age" (true, btw) but no, you get idiotic out lashings. I'd even go so far as to say that it is those idiotic outlashings that CAUSE most of the "warping" that society's knee jerk reaction of "That is wrong He touched you in a naughty spot!" does more damage than the act itself.
The Daily Wire Is Quietly Shooting a Pro-ICE Movie. We Got the Script.
The film, with the working title Pawn Shop, centers on an Antifa siege of a Minneapolis pawn shop amid anti-ICE unrest. On one side: an ICE agent joined by a group of pawn-shop employees and customers. On the other: a rabble of progressive protesters, and eventually a bloodthirsty MS-13 death squad, both intent on rescuing a Hispanic man detained by ICE. It plays out exactly how you’d expect it would.
The film’s first minutes will likely get the most attention. As Pawn Shop opens, two ICE agents in Minneapolis arrest the Latino man, later revealed to be an MS-13 boss. Dimwitted liberal activists film and scuffle with the agents as they try to take their suspect away.
Then the film’s Renée Good stand-in enters, slamming her Subaru into the ICE van. Described with the subtlety of a brick as “MELANIE (40), a fat blue-hair,” the woman, blasting NPR, revs up again and fatally hits ICE agent “Juan” with her car. Then his ICE partner, “Mike,” shoots her in a justifiable killing.
Melanie reacts to the drawn gun with panic...
She MASHES on the gas as she throws the car into reverse, accidentally SLAMMING Juan out of the way. He goes flying into the gutter, bleeding...
And as the car reverses, Mike FIRES TWICE through the
windshield...
The first shot takes the [sic] Melanie in the neck, below her covid
mask. The second in the head, above her covid mask.
Blood SPLATTERS on her PASSENGER’s (40s, female, overweight)
forehead and matching covid mask.
From there, the ICE agent drags his suspect into the pawn shop, with an Antifa mob hot on their heels. The stage is now set for a siege, during which numerous Molotov cocktails will be thrown and shotgun shells will fly. Rest assured that no liberal piety will survive.
Inside the pawn shop, we meet its grizzled Hispanic owner and his son, newly back from college and majoring in Chicano studies. Much to his father’s chagrin, the son is dressed in a Che Guevara shirt and “listening to a POP SONG unfitting for a man.” A pawn-shop security guard quips they’re lucky the boy didn’t get a sex change.
What the trans community has not grasped yet is that when a child transitions, they are in actuality killing the first child, hence dead name. If your child is old enough, you are under no obligation to care for them. My child transitioned as adult and it took me several years to figure out that the person who replaced my son, is nothing like my son . I didn't give birth to that person, I didn't raise that person, and I am under no obligation to care for that person. She essentially killed my son.
Female privilege is a real thing
I am writing this after just finding out that Christa Pike got her execution paused at the last minute. Yes, Christa Pike, the woman who lured an innocent girl into the woods, tortured her to death, kept a piece of her skull as a trophy and tried to kill another inmate in prison. A federal court is halting her execution to consider whether her abusive childhood was taken into account. No joke, look it up.
And of course, we can't forget the Lindsay Clancy case where a woman strangled her three children to death with premeditation but was almost acquitted (and might get the case dismissed) because boohoo she felt a bit sad.
And finally, you have the Cornell hoax where a woman willingly took drugs, alcohol and engaged in group sex with some frat dudes (check the original police report) only to take back her word and claim she was forced in order to save her reputation. Now the internet wants to lynch the men accused.
Do you see the common thread in all three cases? I'll tell you, it's women not being held responsible for their actions. No matter what they do, they are the victim. And that is the conceit of feminism. It tells us women are equal to men, therefore deserving equal rights, but also women can't be held equally responsible for their actions. Well guess what, rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. If you want the same rights as men, don't complain if you are held to the same moral or legal standard! Abolish female privilege now!
The Jane Doe in the Cornell University rape case could have made better decisions, and that should be okay to say out loud.
We've seemingly become so adamant to protect and comfort rape victims that we become angry when someone dares to suggest that the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions objectively played a role in their victimization. Apparently, this is commonly referred to as "victim blaming."
Whether we want to admit it or not, there are instances where blaming the victim of a crime to some degree, regardless if it's rape or not, is valid. None of us have any right or logic to live our daily lives and think that bad things can't happen to us, or that there aren't bad people who are waiting for us to slip up and let our guard down in order to take advantage of us.
It's not wrong to point out, in this case, that not enough was done on part of the victim to mitigate or minimize the risk of being sexually assaulted. Yes, we know people shouldn't rape, but pointing out the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions isn't the same as apologizing for or legitimizing rape like so many seem to think.
As much as I hate it, we don't live in a society that will ever be free from rapists. So maybe that's something we should keep in the back of our heads before we ever decide to go to a frat house full of horny men and drink and do ketamine? I don't understand the mindset that would think that anyone should be entitled to engage in risky behavior like that and be immune from danger or consequence.
Young Man Is Wrongfully Punished For Experiencing His First Love
1. Juvenile-Related Sex Laws Without Any Sense Of True Justice
As I was browsing around on YouTube last night, I came across this one video of a sentencing hearing involving a young man who had sexual intercourse with his girlfriend four different times. Did he forcibly rape her? No. Did he coerce her into having sex? No. Did he sexually molest her? No. Did he even groom her? No. His girlfriend was his first love.
Nonetheless, none of those facts made any difference to the judge. This young man had already pleaded guilty to a sexual offense, and the only thing that she was interested in was the fact that he was 23 years of age and his girlfriend was only 12 years old. Now, I know what many of you are going to say, but watch the video first and then form your own opinions about this matter.
The name of the 23-year-old defendant is Hector Enrique Laura Sanchez. He is an immigrant from Honduras. You may think that a 23-year-old man is way too old to be intermingling with a 12-year-old girl. However, back when the late Loni Anderson, an actress, was 12 years old, she dated a 22-year-old man. Her parents allowed the courtship. Of course, the late Ms. Anderson was a full-figured woman by then.
The criminal defense attorney even stressed that the 12-year-old girl that Mr. Sanchez had sexual relations with was physically precocious for her years and had an enriched sexual vocabulary. He also pointed out to Judge Stephanie Boyd that the girl told the police that she had been the one to seduce Mr. Sanchez rather than the other way around. The girl's mother didn't want him to go to jail or prison.
Some of you may argue that this girl was just a child. According to medical science, she wasn't. There is a world of a difference between a 12-year-old girl who is an adolescent and a prepubescent child who may be only 5 or 6 years of age.
Republican congressional candidate Brandon Herrera implied COVID-19 “wasn’t bad enough” because not enough obese people died. The remarks were made during Herrera’s appearance on Elijah Schaffer’s Slightly Offensive on July 31, 2022, approximately a year before his first congressional run.
The conversation began with the participants discussing diversity on romance and dating shows and whether contestants’ racial preferences affected which people were eliminated before turning toward obesity. After the host said white men prefer to date white women over Black women, Herrera said, “I wonder if they’re solving for all variables here. Because there’s also like an obesity epidemic in the female Black community. So it’s like, okay, well, maybe …did you show them like a 100 random Black women and they just maybe don’t like obese people?”
After another participant, TimCast producer Lisa Jackson, then explained she hates obese people alleging she was being bullied by them when she was younger because she was skinny. Herrera then joked that perhaps they “hated you because there wasn’t enough of you to eat.”
Jackson then repeated that she hated “fat people” and “especially fat women” and called them “the most undisciplined, freaking disgusting people ever,” telling them to “stop putting food in your mouth.” Herrera appeared amused during the unhinged rant.
Host Elijah Shaffer then said, “Brandon’s like, shit, this is not helping my life.” However, Herrera then affirmed the sentiment: “No, no, I’m here for it, dude. I’m of the opinion COVID wasn’t bad enough because if you had something that just unfairly targeted fucking fat people, I’m here for it,” Herrera said. He then added, “I would have worn my mask nowhere on purpose.”
Herrera is the Republican candidate in Texas’ 23rd Congressional District, where he is running against Democratic nominee Katy Padilla Stout.
(Kawaiigardenerwolf)
I think ultimately at first we should see sex separated schools, women get a standard education where as males are tested to see if they qualify for standard education and eventual but limited interaction with female civilization, and the ones who disqualify are castrated and put in mines or some shit. Based on what I have studied with animals a good sex ratio is 10% male and 90% female. Just enough to prevent inbreeding.
(Spaguetti-betti)
eah, I agree they turn demonic at the start of puberty, because that's when their sexual desire and hormones flood their bodies and basically make them incapable of seeing women and girls as anything other than a source of great pleasure. Basically the orgasm for them is a high, and they constantly seek highs and have, in general more than woman, an addictive personality or nature. I have more thoughts on that, especially cause I have ADHD, I feel like I understand them better than the average woman. Castrating is not going to happen, cause males protect each other and they are in powerful positions currently. Average man hates feminists and looking for excuses to hate us more and inflict more violence on us. Average woman is a pick me and/or a boy mom, so will protect her precious rapist son from anything.
I agree with the 10% males thing. I wish it was 1%, but inbreeding :(
(Kawaiigardenerwolf)
I used to think it was puberty that made them demonic too. But in recent years and in my observation they are literally born fucked up. Usually a pre pubescent boy who is demonic is the result of environmental and genetic shortcomings, things which will cause girls to turn in on themselves, but boys to lash out. There are cases where literal 6 year old boys brought guns to school and shot their teacher or tried to strangle them. I agree with your averages, and in general I find males to be a lost cause, but I think it's entirely possible to uplift women, even ones in the depths of pickmeism, to overcome their self loathing, male worshipping programming. It might be harder to reprogram a woman who has birthed a male, due to imprinting, but I think young girls can be led down the path of self respect simply by being present as a female role model.
[Translated "Another "Special Military Operation" awaits Russia. It will be very short."]
The Lithuanian parliament has approved a constitutional amendment lifting the ban on stationing nuclear weapons[…]
A month ago, Poland unexpectedly backed away from the idea[…]
Whatever one’s opinion of the Poles, they have a good head on their shoulders. They understand the prospect of becoming[…]the next training ground where Russian missile crews practice combat strikes[…]
What is needed is a suicidal country with absolutely no brains[…]
Such small yet proud kamikazes in our country’s immediate neighborhood have been indispensable to the project of "containing Russia"[…]
The revision of the Lithuanian constitution and the lifting of the ban on stationing nuclear weapons in the country signal that such a useful idiot has been found[…]
Such reasoning betrays not merely stupidity, but a parochial sort of stupidity[…]And it won’t be Lithuania doing the defending[…]Once the decision is made that the time has come to make Russia an offer it cannot refuse, Lithuania will have absolutely no room for maneuver[…]
A few years ago, to put it cynically, Ukraine was "sold" to Russia[…]A security threat of such magnitude was created in its "soft underbelly" that Moscow was forced to address the problem[…]Warheads stationed just a few hours' drive from Minsk and Kaliningrad would amount to yet another proposition[…]
It is not as if Russia has no choice at all. Russia does have a choice: *how* to fight[…]It would be short: a military conflict in the Baltics, simply by virtue of geography, cannot play out the same way as the one in Ukraine[…]
Since our adversaries are the ones shifting the conversation to the realm of nuclear threats, Russia could well afford to forgo deploying ground troops entirely. Nothing but missiles with the appropriate warheads. A decision that is not merely quick, but lightning-fast. Do not take those seconds lightly
(Context: Blaines is a Pokétuber that I personally used to watch when I was younger before an incident where he promoted his OnlyFans in a Discord Server with minors in it and banned anyone who called him out on it. I just now found out about a past controversy from 2016 as seen below)
John McAuliffe, an international member of the British party, columnist at Digital Journal and the Cambridge Globalist, was suspended this week after allegedly posting on Facebook a message in which he described the genocide as “the most useful political tool of the Zionist government in Israel to establish a financial racket in the West, whereby Israel receives an unlimited sum for the duration of its existence,” The Jewish News reported Monday.
The suspension, made known to the Jewish News by a Labour spokesperson, is the latest in a string of punitive measures against members who have made anti-Semitic hate speech.
A White House policy advisor during the Biden administration said that he confronted a top Trump administration official over the decision to kick nearly 1 million people off their health coverage.
Ami Fields-Meyer said that he approached Dr Mehmet Oz on a flight they shared to ask about the decision earlier this week to remove more than 750,000 enrollees from public healthcare exchanges established under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as “Obamacare.”
Fields-Meyer said that he approached Oz politely once they stepped off the jetway.
“What the man in charge of healthcare for the people on the very margins of society said…was revealing,” he wrote.
“I said: ‘Sir, you need to stop kicking hundreds of thousands of people off health insurance just because they are vulnerable. “Not using your insurance” is not a reason to evict someone from their insurance,’” Fields-Meyer posted.
“We were mid-handshake and he pulled me in and grabbed tighter and got upset and raised his voice and said: ‘What are you talking about man?! Those aren’t real people. They’re illegal aliens!’” Fields-Meyer added.
What I Believe In
(Feel free to disagree but don't be a hater)
American &
Christian Nationalism.
Republican Government
Voting for 30+ citizens,
Voter equality between races and sexes.
Strengthen the police force, ICE, and border patrol.
Reduce government spending. Privatize Medicare/Medicaid.
Strengthen the power and respect towards the American worker.
Lower the power of big companies/isurance companies — and STOP loopholes and fraud.
Illegalize pornography, Illegalize non-medical drugs, Illegalize Rape.
And kill ALL pedophiles and rapists
We are developing the world's largest database and registry of baby killers and their supporters.
This will include abortion supporters.
When the law finally changes this registry will be provided to law enforcement to hunt and track down all these monsters.
#shetoo
A 15-year-old minor was placed under formal investigation by an anti-terrorism investigating judge in Lyon on Friday, September 18. He is suspected of plotting an attack on a high school in the city
Was a future attack averted? A 15-year-old minor was placed under formal investigation by an anti-terrorism investigating judge in Lyon on Friday, suspected of plotting an attack on a high school in the city; this was confirmed to RMC and BFMTV by multiple sources, including the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor's Office (PNAT)
On Friday, September 18, the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor's Office (PNAT) opened a judicial investigation into a 15-year-old minor on charges of "criminal conspiracy with a terrorist purpose to prepare one or more crimes against persons." He has been placed under formal investigation for "participation in an individual terrorist enterprise" and released under judicial supervision
The suspect was planning to carry out an attack at a school in Lyon. "He is accused of having planned a highly premeditated attack on a high school, indiscriminately targeting the students at the institution," the PNAT told BFMTV
According to BFMTV's information, the target was not the high school the minor had attended earlier in the year—and from which he had been expelled. The planned attack involved the use of a knife, according to the same reports
Investigators noted that the 15-year-old held "an ideology with distinct far-right markers," according to a source close to the investigation speaking to BFMTV. According to our information, he was deeply affected by the death of Quentin Deranque—a radical far-right activist who had beed killed in a street fight in Lyon last February
nip slip away
[From “August 8, 2026: Re-imagining Villains 239”]
Panel 1: under the title “The Joy of Painting with Uncle Adolf”, Hitler is painting a landscape and says “Hi friends, let's paint!”
Panel 2: Hitler drops accidentally red splats on the canvas with his brush; he says “Woops, didn't mean to do that”
Panel 3: Hitler paints a Bolshevik felling on his back, as if he had been shot, and he comments “Let's just add this little guy here”
Panel 4: Hitler concludes with “Remember: there are no mistakes” and “Just happy accidents”
(MAGA Comments on a story about ICE mistreatment of pregnant women)
Vanessa Marie: Oh, so now you care about unborn babies?
Donna Paters: This is laughable trash... they aren't going to take the time, waste medical expense or spend the money when they're deporting them anyway!…Do you mean like all the abortions and the kids and women that have been trafficked and the who were transgendered?
Christine Soderman Figueroa: As usual, total propaganda BS~ Where is your proof, you politically compromised leftist? Posting an extreme left propaganda hack rag story is not proof. Follow Promethean Action to see the truth~
(Translated]
True men are stupid.
Men are supposed to make a comeback by not learning how to write, but only doing six-dildo or meat shields.
In a multi-racial country such as the United States, poop men often beat other men in the field of study.
In fact, when black men, white men, and dung men were adopted from middle-class families in the United States and raised in the same environment, they were said to have high intelligence in the order of dung men, white men, and black men.
Interestingly, in the case of women, the difference in intelligence by race was not as noticeable as that of men.
Evidence that only women are the basic form of mankind and true humans is also revealed here.
So what's the conclusion?
Black men with the highest male hormone levels, larger physique, and larger jaji are less intelligent than poop men.
Masculinity and intelligence are in an incompatible relationship.
Dumbness is a virtue for men.
The reason why Yangnam is arrogant is because he lacks masculinity and studies clumsy.
So masculinity is the best, so it has reached the point of being treated as intersex.
Therefore, the answer is to cut out the frontal lobe when a man is born to fundamentally prevent accidents.
i hope as many of my followers can see this as possible so i can stop saying it
i wouldn't have cared if ms good simply ran a stop sign, she and her little gf are everything wrong with this goddamn country, and they both deserved to die for the following reasons...
-they're lesbians (that's more than enough to justify their deaths)
-they're child abusers
-they're race traitors trying to sell out the fruits of our hard work to people coming here specifically to steal from us
It was people like you that actually deserved the camps
The affair is embarrassing for the National Rally (RN): the municipal police officer involved is also a member of the party's security detail[…]
“I can’t take it anymore, earlier we were on Carnot, ragheads, niggers, ragheads, niggers.” Another police officer: “That’s France for you”[…]
The policeman continued: "We became Christians under Clovis, we'll become Muslims under Macron"[…]
We see a customer in a shop[…]"There you go, the little French girl working to earn a pittance, and you've got three Arabs. These guys just got a thousand euros from the CAF (family allowance office)"[…]
A video about General Bigeard[…]is playing. The commentator claims he was also a "torturer in Algeria"[…]The police officers' reaction: "So what? We screwed the Arabs, we screwed the Arabs!(…)And how many soldiers did they screw?" Another[…]asks: "So where does torture begin?" The policeman continues[…]"The guy who made this video had better watch out(…)Yeah, they're far-left, left-wing thugs, you know." I have less respect for them than for the Arabs»[…]
The police officers continued their tirade[…]“We’ve had forty years of socialism, so there’s no respect for anything at all, no respect for fathers, no respect for mothers. But hey, a father is a father, he’s the one who gets an erection, he’s the one with the muscles… Cro-Magnons worked like that. And back then, in the caves, if their men weren’t there, they’d get killed. You have to put everything in context.” They continued: “They say you colonized, but you were the first people to enslave! These monkeys sold each other between tribes”[…]
Then come the final remarks[…]"The Russians, they're coming here." Another replies: "Oh yeah, five, six years. They'll kill the sandniggers. They'll pillory Macron and all his faggots. Well, we'll be forced to drink vodka and eat caviar for a few weeks." Another voice: "We need a general with a big pair of balls[…]" Yet another: "A little coup d'état, we need a little dictatorship in France"
The japanese shouldn't have to apologize or pay for anything. Period. They make better products & pop-culture than the rest of Asia, therefore they don't owe china, southeast Asia or Korea an apology anymore than we owe them an apology for nuking Hiroshima or Nagasaki. In fact, none of them deserve any apologies. Fuck all the victims of the 2nd sino-japanese war. Every. Single. One. Of. Them. Japan is my favorite Asian country, therefore Japan should be the sovereign power in asia, not China. End of story.
Hot take: If you think you're not a handmaiden while genuinely believing killing moidlets is bad, you're actually just outing yourself as a straight up pedo/moid and need to be killed or kill yourself.
> Now that I’ve peaked on the male condition, absolutely makes my blood boil seeing boymoms in public or online. Look at her, blissfully oblivious, smiling in joy while hugging her future rapist/street pisser/school shooter/prositition purchaser/sex tourist/crossdresser/pedophile, etc. All of the worst men in the world had a naive woman change their diapers thinking “I’m going to raise him to be different from all of the other evil men in the world!”
> “NOOO HE WAS A KID OKAY” okay, a scrote thats currently a kid. in 10 years he wont be, then what? The white knighting from self proclaimed “male haters” is so sad to see sometimes. Not even an incel would infight to defend a little girl who was murdered by another moid.
It should be common knowledge that whenever someone from the group that commits 97% of all violent crimes dies, its a good thing. Its like trying to defend an invasive species “NOOO DONT CRUSH ITS EGGS THATS LITERALLY A BABY” and then complain when it grows up and now theres billions of them running around and they start pissing on and destroying everything. If you know it’s going to be destructive when it grows up, why not get rid of it while it’s still growing in your stomach? It’s going to end up posting on soyjak party about how much it hates women (the ones who endured 9 months of suffering to give him life) anyway.
> Not men but little boys. I don't care what anyone says, their Y chromosome makes them more prone to evil and harm. In kindergarten the only kids who were catching small lizards and making jokes about killing birds and bugs were boys. I think that says something
> I love how everyone here draws a hard line between dindu nuffin boys and rapeapes at exactly 18. Press anyone here about when KAM starts to apply and maybe they will be agreeing when a 16-17yo is out there raping girls and women but a hard no if a 13yo, 10yo, 8yo, 5yo is out there raping/molesting girls and women. Ok so when does a male actually become problematic enough to call him a rapeape and apply KAM to him? No one here will tell you when, even if a literal 10yo is out there violently raping women like it happened in the UK and largely goes unreported in the rest of the world. Calling for the death of a violent moid? Yasss queeeeeeeeeeen Y chromosome is the problem1!!111. Calling for the death of a violent moidlet? Nooooooooooo dindu nuffins!!!! it's le society!!!! muh education!!!11!!!
I think if you can agree that the Y chromosome is the problem in adult males, you can also agree that the Y chromosome is the problem in minor males. All males are trash, and the line is definitely not drawn at 18, nor 10, nor 5. Perhaps at 2-3 years old, but at that point, if the only way for a moidlet to not be a violent rapist asshole is to be a literal toddler then why even bother with some dumb moralfag larp. Just fucking kill them all.
> So fucking real. I’m so tired of the naive libfems who think men are evil because of “male socialization” as if you can de-mutt a pitbull.
Reality is, they’re evil from birth. I also hate boymoms for coddling their little demon spawn scrotelings, like buying them custom birthday cakes with fire trucks or whatever little scrotes like on it. all this for a future rapist / porn addict who will have fantasies about raping her when he reaches puberty. Kill them all
JD Vance has said he is “doing as much of God’s work as possible” and that he is OK “if that leads to the end times”, which he says “are coming”
The US vice-president made the comments during a Monday podcast interview with Bryce Crawford, a 22-year-old evangelical host with over a million YouTube followers and videos featuring sensationalist headlines including “Preaching the gospel in Chicago’s deadliest neighborhood” and “Debating a ‘gay’ pastor”
Speaking about the Christian prophetic notion that the world as humanity knows it will end one day, Vance said: “Do I think we are in the end times? I don’t know
“While I’m fascinated by it, I think that focusing on it too much can be very bad,” he said, adding that if his work “leads to the end times, OK, and if that leads to … us building a better world that thrives and survives for a very long time after I’m gone, that’s great, too”
Vance, who published a spiritual memoir earlier this summer about his conversion to Catholicism, said: “I think you got to just kinda try and have an attitude of: the end times may be coming, in fact they are coming, it’s just a question of whether they’re coming thousands of years down the road, or a few months down the road”
He said: “I think there are things about the world that make me feel, like, not shocked if the antichrist was walking among us”
[Comment under “WN & peak oil”]
The coming Day of Kalki will make the Hellstorm Holocaust look like a children’s birthday party
To paraphrase Savitri Devi, the next time it will not be the finest nation on Earth who undergoes destruction but humanity who undergoes the inevitable destruction. The next time, it will not be the Superman who commits suicide in a bunker while the subhumans jeer with delight but the billions of subhumans who will meet their inevitable demise. The next time, it will not be the elite of mankind who are put on trial to be judged by the dwarves in “the most famous trial in human history” the Nuremberg Trial, but humanity who will be weighed in the balance on Judgement Day and found to be wanting
I’m convinced of it. There is a climax coming this century, which will be the logical conclusion of recorded human history
(On Lindsay Clancy's case)
(@ICONOCLASTIAE)
She didn’t admit to killing them, nor has she been convicted of it. She was indicted for murder. Sorry you read at a 5th grade level tho.
(@Enigma1062369)
You're a ridiculously stupid woman...
(@ICONOCLASTIAE)
I just put the pic of your kid on a fun forum where men enjoy those kinds of images. :)
(@Mythheart_)
Fitting the child murderer sympathizer would be involved in cp forums
(@ICONOCLASTIAE)
Patrick Clancy Murdered his kids. I don’t sympathize w him. But thanks for those pics of your kids too. I will make sure they find their way to the appropriate website.
Russia must strike in such a way that the enemy understands that it must capitulate. There should not even be such a discussion. If necessary, we are obliged to use [tactical nuclear weapons]... If we need to strike, we will strike. And that is not up for discussion.
women and morality
the biggest scam of all time was convincing women of their inherent morality. that we were the moral sex, and that that our equivalent to male violent strength was a mystical notion of inner strength - morality
even if he would win any fight, you as a woman get to be the bigger person. he kills and rapes a woman and thus gets what he wants, to be her last sexual partner, but you as a woman oppose killing so really, you won because you remained pure of heart
morality doesn't exist objectively. the most heinous crime you can think of, another person can justify in the name of their greater good
notice how in nature, conflicts are never settled by who's the most virtuous. animals do not convince each other on the basis of their morality, because morality doesn't exist in nature. animals use violence to settle conflicts because violence, or threat thereof, ultimately is the only tool that settles conflicts
at the root of virtue signaling moral faggotry lies weakness. because if the virtue signaler was strong they would have just gotten their way, no need to talk about how great things could have been
true morality is decided by the winner. the weak can not afford true morality for they lost and are out of options, they lact the actual power to make choices. you can not act moral if you can not act since you aren't a subject
that's why you see males always supporting each other, no questions asked. they don't play the losers' moral game
in life, people have different goals, and some will clash. these clashes are solved with violence in all of its many forms. the winner acts based on their idea of right and wrong
appealing to the winner's morality is useless since the winner is not bound to social rules and psychological cope like the loser is
women are not more moral for eating shit. changing this inherent belief is the first step to actually freeing yourself. you will always resist your own freedom if you secretly think that the one who submits is the better person
women need to become violent and willing to dominate men. it's the only way out
(Defending deceased Serb war criminals Ratko Mladić)
Basically we don't know what would have happened to non Muslims if this man had not handled the situation it could have been 8000
Christians (®
In the small Vancouver Island city of Nanaimo, Josiah Patton has spent the last four years alternately shouting, begging, and despairing into the void of the white supremacist dating site WhiteDate
“I’m ultimately here to find a White woman - the younger the better (15+),” Patton wrote on his “ParadiseSeeker” profile[…]“A good wife ultimately submits (especially sexually) to her husband and enjoys doing so. I would only consider monogamy with a young (15-25) maiden (that is, a virgin who has never had sex with a man [other than me])”[…]
Patton sent over twice as many messages as the next most active user on WhiteDate, and made the second highest number of posts[…]Patton wants people who aren’t white, and “race-traitors” (white people who have relationships with people who aren’t white), to be deported[…]
Patton changed his current WhiteDate profile after the Canadian Anti-Hate Network sent Patton a request for comment. His location is now listed as “Miami,” his education is now “Doctorate,” and he replaced the text in his About Me section to read “Disclaimer—all posts on this account and any other account or presumed identity—past, present, and future—incorrectly assumed to be I, may perhaps be of I, the actor, playing original character roles for the purposes of entertainment”[…]
He wrote on WhiteDate that his original career plan “was to be a grade 12 high school teacher and meet gals that way (and date some of them after they graduate) but that won't happen now that I've been rejected from teacher school due to being a sane White male.” Despite this, he describes himself on his tutoring website as “a third-generation teacher”[…]
“It is worth remembering,” he wrote in June 2025, “that the most masculine act is RAPE…and the most feminine act is absolute submission or being a love slave of one man”[…]
While he used slurs to degrade Muslims, Patton endorsed his own fetishized and orientalist version of Islam, which he referred to as “White Sharia”
[From “Caduceus”]
Yesterday, in the comments section, I once again linked to the “How Awake Are You?” scale [See here]. Mauricio’s 2018 comment—noting that the leap from level 5 to 6 is astronomical—hits the nail on the head regarding why this blog stands like a solitary obelisk among the racial right. I have noticed, for instance, that X users who sympathise with National Socialism and Hellenism often like my tweets or the ones I repost. Occasionally, they are on the same wavelength as me when I mention The Turner Diaries. Yet, when I criticise the Neanderthal Right I receive neither likes nor retweets
It is obvious that many struggle immensely to reach levels 8 through 10. Once one truly reaches the tenth level—as Benjamin and I have—it is no longer possible to have friends in this world[…]
I have observed a tendency to climb down from the caduceus and crawl along the ground once more. For example, TOQ Online—the webzine Greg Johnson edited back then—used to publish revolutionary articles by Michael O’Meara, and I recall a piece where John Gardner spoke very favourably of Himmler. Nowadays, it would be unthinkable to find such articles on Counter-Currents! This regression toward the earth is endemic to white nationalism, not just to those forums Johnson edited
Meanwhile, the culture reflects the abject state into which the white race as a whole has fallen
Yesterday, I watched the first season of The Day of the Jackal. What a contrast to the earlier film, which I saw on the big screen with my parents over half a century ago, featuring an all-white cast. The only good thing about this 2024 adaptation is that the Jackal—played by a white British actor—kills the police officer who had been hunting him since the first episode: a negress[…]
One can only imagine what it would be like if, instead of this media trash, a series were filmed based on Harold Covington’s best novel, The Brigade!
"Trans" began in 2011. There were transsexuals long before then but they are entirely different. Were I a parent and I had a child announce this, I would handcuff her to a radiator and stomp her phone and give away her computer. But "trans" is a cult, it peaked in 2023 and is now fading out.
[...]
I am disgusted with the self-important brats that make up this cult. The passion of its supporters just astonishes me, I've lost several friends I would have sworn were smart enough to know better than accept this pile of lies.
In a few more years the cult will be gone, leaving some life-shortened breastless women and piss-dripping eunuchs. Almost all of them will be gay, in failing health, and completely unwanted.
Changing their names to Lilith and injecting temu estrogen isn’t going to change that pesky Y chromosome one bit.
It’s being selectively deleted and losing segments. All of human history amounts to about 300K years, and the original y copies were at 1400. Now, they are at 55. That’s a 96% loss from proto-humans to now. So whenever I see those overly optimistic (likely co written by desperate men trying to make it seem not so bad) insisting that it’ll be “5 million years until there’s any real damage” I have to laugh because looking at the copy loss in such little time makes it like… thirty minutes before the Y is goneee and replaced by something else more biologically appropriate and sustainable. And this massive unprecedented deletion of the chromosome is due to exactly like u said, our bodily adaption to snuff out the violent, stupid male because deep down in our core, beyond our active conscious reason, our bodies know that aggressive, angry, and intellectually-lacking mates pose a threat to the women (the OG chromosome which must be prioritized and protected at all cost) and childrens immediete safety, not to mention their moldy damaged genes will pass along mental disease and further regressions. so obviously, threats to humanity will cause it to evolve to remove the threat. They came from us, an evolution from the X, as we all begin female, and then they will return to some mutation of the X, over time. Signifying that the Male was a failed experiment. u gotta lowk just kinda laugh, even if we won’t be seeing it in our lifetime. it’s still a small victory knowing that no matter what they do or say against it, their very own bodies have already deemed them a net loss and need to be taken out with the trash on the next update drop
#its not just humans either its the entire spectrum of life#males are a failed experiment in EVERY form and earth and all its bodies have decided theyre truly not worth keeping around
(@Female-uncle)
Men know that women will inherit the earth no matter what they do and they are mad as hell about it
yes this. They might have been able to stick around and work with us, but they chose this path a long time ago and unfortunately thousands of years of eugenics and rape have caused a nasty brutish strain of male to be the predominant one. I genuinely think this knowledge that they are facing extinction is a big part of why a lot of men transition, they know the ship is sinking and they want off NOW
(@haunting-hunger)
Genuinely need them to die en masse
The best way to this would be them killing each other but even then they get women wrapped up in their problems because they treat us as their property and thus they view hurting us as a type of revenge
We need some kind of illness or virus that kills men only
[Translated from Italian]
The WhatsApp group at the center of the scandal is linked to the political orbit of Roberto Vannacci and brings together around 300 people—including officials, local committee leaders, and sympathizers—primarily in Lombardy[…]The chat contained antisemitic and racist messages, subversive statements[…]"Shitty Arabs! They should be exterminated!" reads one of the many messages. The chat administrator is Renato Maturo, the head of the Milan-based "421" committee and a long-time associate of Ignazio La Russa
Among the chat members are also the "black baron" Roberto Jonghi Lavarini, formerly of Brothers of Italy, and the founder of National Future's think-tank, National Renaissance, that is Luca Sforzini (who might be on the way out to join Forza Italia). Racist, antisemitic, insurrectionist content abounds. For example, on the party organisation, militants speak of a "rigorous" and "military-style" structure. Then the exortations: "We must always be anti-constitutional!"; "we stand ready at the general's orders! Therefore stand by…". The idea of forcible action is presented as an alternative to political quagmire: "Even with 51% it won't be enough". The conclusion is clear: "Until someone undertakes forcible action, we'll be stuck in this situation"
The chat's participants show clear reference points: "We need another Valerio Borghese", [referring to the fascist military leader who initiated an abortive coup in the the 1960s]. And Nazism as well: "Better than a European union, the Führer aimed to create a United States of the world! He would have torn down barriers and we would all be speaking German now. Instead we have this Europe of money, of banks". Onwards to a masonic European Union: "When I see the Italian flag flown side by side with that filthy blue masonic rag with 12 shit dogshit diarrhea stains I get real fucking pissed". Finally, the Jews. Who are "Satan-worshipping beasts", "pedophiles, cabalists, cannibals"
