#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

Anon #sexist #god-complex #crackpot lolcow.farm

Since I doubt we are going extinct anytime soon, this outcome is inevitable. Males must be, and will be, turned into drones.

It will take many generations for males to be reformatted at the gene level, but they will effectively become novelty sex machines whose only purpose is looking cute and transferring sperm long before we invariably select their nature to reflect their reality.

I like to imagine the designer male product of the future . A halfwitted drone covered in rainbow embellishments whose biology is constructed around the premise of female pleasure. Down to his very soul, the man is a drone who lives and dies by a woman’s fleeting acknowledgement. A frivolous, expendable creature who understands its highest honor is the chance to be burned for fuel by a woman who may or may not deem his genes worthy of preserving after the fact.

Unlike most conspiracy theories, this is absolutely real and inevitable. Males will be the accessories of our female progeny as they become and create wonders beyond our wildest dreams. Every piece of the earth will be beautiful where a woman’s presence has graced it. Her constructs, including the males of her species, will be magnificent. Herself a god among gods, her and her sisters probably even learning to fly and communicate telepathically, among other feats too based for me to even fathom. Our greatest granddaughters will look to us now as we look at bacteria.

Russian Orthodox Church, Russian Education Ministry and Archpriest Igor Aksenov #fundie #sexist #forced-birth themoscowtimes.com

At a rural school in Russia’s Tver region this March, a class of ninth-grade students examined models of fetuses during a lesson

"Future adults have come to understand a woman's responsibility toward the life of an unborn child,” the school administration wrote of the lesson. “This is the period that determines whether a small human being will live a full life or die forever”

This class was a so-called “chastity lesson,” part of a growing nationwide campaign that brings Orthodox priests into classrooms to promote abstinence before marriage, discourage abortion and reinforce what Russian authorities describe as traditional family values

The campaign comes as Russia grapples with a deepening demographic crisis[…]
Many of the so-called “chastity lessons” take place as part of Family Studies, the Education Ministry's new course on family life introduced in 2024[…]
Some church officials have proposed taking the campaign beyond the classroom. Archpriest Igor Aksenov has suggested producing chastity-themed merch, including T-shirts with slogans like “I'm waiting” and “Chaste until marriage,” that could appeal to teenagers[…]
The Russian Orthodox Church says spiritual and moral education should provide an alternative to what it calls the "hedonistic values that dominate society." As a result, classes often contrast Christian marriage with cohabitation, which is commonly referred to in Russia as a "civil marriage."

At a school in the Tver region town of Staritsa earlier this year, 10th-graders were asked: “What should a strong family life be built on — chastity or passion?”

Students walked to the front of the classroom and cast their votes on a board divided into two columns, one for each choice. Photos of the vote were later published on the school's official VKontakte page[…]
Alongside fetal models and presentations featuring images of embryos, priests also screen films promoting anti-abortion messages and traditional family values

Démocratie Participative #racist #sexist #wingnut tastycrousty.rest

[From “Russia: Senegalese arrive to collect garbage”]

North Korean garbage collectors cost too much, says the mayor of Orenburg[…]
The white world is collapsing demographically everywhere, and Russia is no exception. Despite what one might hear in the Jewish media, this country is a parliamentary democracy committed to the laws of the market[…]
Russia has adopted feminism as a fundamental part of its state ideology. This is a legacy of Bolshevism, which, as early as 1918, implemented some of the most radical feminist laws in the world. Stalin did try to limit their most catastrophic effects[…]
Tools available to Russian democracy to convince women to be mothers and not whores are limited to financial aid[…]
The Jewish beast in Kyiv continues to prolong this conflict, bleeding Ukraine dry in the process, and places Russia in a particularly difficult situation in terms of human resources

So here we have a Russian bourgeoisie hiring Senegalese people to clean the streets of towns near Kazakhstan. This is the state of moral decay affecting Western countries[…]people must be paid to deign to do such essential things as not living amidst garbage[…]
Under Stalin, such a speech would have been unthinkable. First, this mayor, like the others, would have been deported to a Siberian camp for counter-revolutionary activities. Then, each district of the city would have been ordered to assemble a volunteer maintenance team[…]
We cannot maintain this capitalist system[…]We must admit that market democracy, human rights, feminism, and the tyranny of immediate profit are deadly threats[…]
I still don't see any debate in Russia about abolishing democracy. It seems Putin is a hardened liberal[…]
Even Lukashenko is bothering with rigged elections. Who can tell me what purpose rigged elections serve?[…]
We can occasionally hold plebiscites on specific issues of interest, but not on the identity of leaders. Do children vote to choose the father of a family?

Anon #sexist #transphobia #ableist #crackpot lolcow.farm

ever since I stopped believing in the myth that women are extra empathetic, I keep realizing

>males lack empathy because they're socially retarded

>males don't notice trannies because they're cognitively retarded

>males don't notice certain colors because they're visually retarded (I'm not joking, look it up)

>trannies dress like shit because males are stylistically retarded

>male-gaze media exists because males are creatively retarded

>absurd fetishes like furries turning into cubes exist because males are sexually retarded

>males can't keep their balance, float in water or tank internal damage like us because they're physically retarded

>the XY chromosome is a mutation because males are conceptually retarded

Males are actually retarded. They even have retard strength.

David J Stewart #fundie #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

So the Bible, God's inspired Word, teaches that it is God's will for women to get married, have children, guide the house and not cause trouble. God is saying that a woman should work in the home. "Guiding the house" means that she is to take care of the business of the home. A family has much to be done. Children need attending to and training. Dishes need to be washed. Clothes need to be cleaned and ironed. Home-cooked meals need to be planned, gathered and prepared. Being a full-time mother is a tremendous amount of work! A mother needs to be at home with her children. A wife needs to prepare to meet her husband when he comes home tired from work. The house needs to be clean. If she is the proper kind of wife, her husband will be praised by others who notice her virtue and character (Proverb 31:23). A wife is to submit to her husband (1st Peter 3:1-5).
You ladies who stay home and care for your family are to be greatly praised, thank you on behalf of America! For you militant femi-nazi rebels who refuse to cater to a man, listen to the Word of God...
It's time for America's women to repent of their rebellious ways and put some clothes back onto their bodies. It's time for America's fathers to start spending more time with their children. It's time for America's mothers to be honored and career women take a back-seat. It is pathetic how young girls are being brain-washed by the public school system to enter the workforce. No sir! Those young girls need to be taught how to make clothes, cook, bake, dress appropriately, walk, talk, respect authority, etc. Our young boys need to learn chivalry, ethics, hard work, morals, decency, respect for the opposite sex, manhood, etc, etc, etc. But you say, "Their supposed to learn that at home." Ok, then why do they BY LAW have to go to school to learn their ABC's and their 123's? Why do they HAVE to legally go learn that they evolved from a monkey type creature?

Démocratie Participative #sexist #racist #psycho tastycrousty.rest

[From “Martyr Cédric Jubillar explains his fight against women's cruelty”]

Just like Jonathann Daval, the media have made Cédric Jubillar into a “monster” accused of embodying the barbaric injustice of the white patriarchy

The facts tell us otherwise

France Info[…]
It is not a gratuitous murder, but the fruit of a long psychological torture which the media meticulously avoid reporting

There was a time when France was a country governed by men, therefore by reason. Today, it's nothing more than a shadow of itself, given over to whores and madness[…]It was accepted that women should be handled harshly

Until 1975, the law recognized the legitimate right of a man to kill the whore who stabbed him in the back. This was before the liberal right decided to destroy society for Simone Veil's wishes

In 1810, when France was the center of the world, the French proclaimed that:

In the case of adultery provided for in Article 336, the murder committed by the husband on his wife, as well as on the accomplice, at the moment when he catches them in the act in the marital home, is excusable[…]

This society wouldn't be in its current state—demographically and mentally—if these women were regularly punished as they deserve. I also believe that it is the suppression of women's rightful domestic discipline that leads to uncontrolled outbursts of male violence

Legalizing male violence is the best way to reduce homicides in these kinds of cases. A simple couple of slaps would have kept that whore alive more surely than all the feminist laws in the world[…]
If Arabs insist on imposing Sharia law in our latitudes, it is not to show off but because every day that passes sees vaginal democracy delivering their women to lecherous Negroes

gtbreddit1 #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Once again I am fantasizing about killing people to cope with the fact that I can't have sex.

The anger and pain I feel over the fact that I have been denied sex for my entire life and the fact that I didn't get to experience sex once at all in my youth is intolerable. I regularly have episodes where I feel sharp pains in my chest and my arms feel light and numb. The only thing that helps me is fantasizing about killing people. I have extended, elaborate fantasies about killing people. Sometimes they are cartoonish, like I imagine myself as Homelander and I level a city, then threaten to level another if the world doesn't give me hot women to have sex with. Other times they are more grounded, like I imagine punishing society by doing a mass shooting before killing myself on the day I finally decide I have nothing left to lose. In my fantasies, nobody is spared. I target the most vulnerable to incur the maximum degree of suffering on society. These fantasies help me get through particularly painful episodes because I escape into a fictional reality where I feel I have been delivered some measure of justice. There are two aspects to my pain. The first is the injuries I have already suffered. The experience of my life thus far at 31 years of age. My youth has come and gone, and I didn't get to experience sex once. I think about the countless number of cute girls I've known and met and come across throughout my life who I felt attracted to, none of whom felt attraction to me. It feels so gravely unjust to me that everyone else gets to experience mutual sexual interest, but I don't. For some reason I have been designated to be denied that experience. When I think about this, rage and anger wash over me. The second aspect is the fact that there is no light at the end of the tunnel for me. As I get older, I get even uglier. My hair gets thinner, my face sags further off my underdeveloped facial bones.

Shirley Heath #wingnut #sexist msn.com

(Talking about Epstein victims)

I, for one, would like to know HOW these women got to be within the Epstein orbit in the first place and what monies, if any, they received. They are forever the victims but it would be nice to have BOTH sides of the story. Some of them were old enough not to get entangled with Epstein etc....

Anon #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

If machines are going to replace either sex it’s going to be the male sex.

A precedent has already been set for it. Most of the labor men claim to be uniquely theirs has been mechanized already, and what hasn’t been has expanded to include women. If our own history isn’t evidence enough, every organized eusocial species is matriarchal. The majority of them being exclusive female populations, bar a few drones, or rarer instances where sterile males and females produce on equal footing. There is no such thing as a male-led and male-populated eusocial species, which is the system these incels suggest with their robot waifus. It goes against their nature. You can redirect a river before you could reverse it. No one is going to achieve the impossible just to save a bunch of whiny useless faggots. Even if they tried, it would not succeed.
I don’t know why they think the elite class would favor with failmales over anyone. Failmales are the most expendable class of people on the planet, in fact every functional society has to continuously come up with ways to neutralize/discard them. Women are less of a liability and are fully capable of contributing equally if not more.

Robot husbandos are far more likely to replace men than robot waifus are to replace women. It’s more efficient and helps tackle a perpetual problem. Even if the precedent weren’t already set and women were worse off than men by themselves, male sentimentality and intrasexual competition would do the failmales in. Not even men think the perfect world is one populated by lazy, entitled, violent coomer neets and their robo cum receptacles. The surviving elite class of males would just want a population of productive females and robots. As long as men get theirs, they don’t give a fuck about saving anyone else, especially not their inferior competition.

Men should learn to accept their place as inferior and expendable and stop coming up with fantasies where some powerful force upends nature to rescue them from themselves. No one but a failmale cares about the plight of the failmale, and even he only cares about himself. That’s just the way men are. They aren’t each other’s friends.

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

To bring it back to humanization/objectification, yes, men often see the “humanized” male icons that females create as derogatory, inaccurate, insulting, and presumptuous. See their common catchphrase: “romance movies are pornography for women”. They can identify false female projections. When they’re in the mood to get on a podium and talk down to someone, they’ll remind women of how ignorant they are.
Humanization, as inaccurate as it is for males, does imply depth, good will, and compassion, so they do not protest a misread when they can capitalize on it. Men want you to think he’s just like a romance novel love interest up until you expect him to act like one. He’ll just string you along for as long as possible.

If men are guilty of excessively objectifying women, women are guilty of excessively humanizing men.

It’s a tragic, ironic inversion.

--

I wish I could be asshole-ish to get off on objectifying men but I just can't. Even my OCs, despite some of them wearing revealing fits get humanized as people and not sex objects.

Jesse Watters #sexist #psycho aol.com

Fox News host Jesse Watters is facing backlash after laughing about American troops becoming "wild animals" around women if they are given testosterone injections

Watters made the comments during a discussion about the possible use of testosterone to help service members dealing with lower endurance and muscle loss

"He says you lose your endurance, muscle mass," Watters said. "So yeah, I want these guys on it, but you know what’s going to happen?"[…]
He then suggested that troops who did not need the treatment would also find a way to take it

"The guys that don’t need it are going to take it. It’s a triple boost, right?" Watters said

The Fox News host then warned women on military bases and in countries visited by US troops to "be careful"

"And then they’re going to get out there and women on base, you guys better be careful," Watters said

"Port calls, women in Asia, you better be careful because these guys are going to be wild animals, and you better watch out"

Watters appeared to laugh as he delivered the remarks, which critics said sounded like a joke about American service members possibly raping or sexually assaulting women

The clip quickly spread across social media, where users slammed Watters for treating the possibility of violence against women as a punchline

"So he's really going to laugh about possible rape in the military and overseas by servicemen," journalist Marty Golingan wrote on X. "There is no bottom for this shit stain"

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

If you really want everyone to get along there needs to be global oppression of men. Once they become second class citizens racism would just fade away. After all, there's no such thing as an all female rape gang.

Anon #ableist #sexist lolcow.farm

The whole love language discourse is male bullshit.

Only the autistic moid mind needs a spec sheet to see where a character’s “love” experience points are allocated, and how each class performs in romantic “matchups”.

The only reason women adopted it is because they have no choice but to converse with men like children if they want to reason with them, otherwise they’re unlikely to be understood at all. Love language is the same as mommy gamifying life lessons with simple rules, small words, and uptalk so her toddler understands it better. No sweetie, it hurts puppies when you kick them, so don’t do it again, or I’ll take away a star! Yes, the puppy likes it when you pet it gently! Good boy, here’s a gold star! Mommy likes it when you give her words of affirmation! Good job, here’s another one! Save up 20 more stars and you’ll get sex!

You can’t rely on men to do the right thing the same way you can’t rely on a toddler to do the right thing. They have no internal drive to care about anything other than gratifying themselves. They can only understand a gratification system with instructions, rewards, and punishments. But men are unfortunately smarter than toddlers, and primarily use their intelligence to flip the rules back on you to get more of what they want.

Jim #sexist #psycho blog.reaction.la

[From “Sexcession”]

It is a sexual recession. Man and women are not getting sex and children

It is a sexual secession. Men and women are going separate ways (which results in no one getting sex and children)

Surveys show men and women are both hurting — less sex for everyone, though more women are getting sex than men. Women, however, are disappointed in the sex, because not getting love and investment, just booty calls

Leftists worst hit, libertarians quite badly hit, conservatives doing less badly, reactionaries least affected, though everyone is hurting[…]
When Tinder first appeared, Miss Average was totally wowed to discover that she could get nailed by a six foot six athlete with six pack abs and six figure income

Then she gradually woke up to the fact that she was just another booty call

Men and women on the apps gamified, minimaxed, and optimized their tactics — Which, since the game of players and bitches is a prisoner’s dilemma game, a negative sum game, made the experience on the apps worse for everyone[…]
Women are complaining men are not hitting on them

Why are men not hitting on them?

Some men, primarily leftists, thinks that men pursuing women just oppresses women. It is creepy. It is abuse according to the Duluth model. So the leftist male waits for a relationship to “organically” emerge[…]
One factor deterring men from hitting on women is the Duluth model. “Believe all women”. In practice of course, on matters related to sex and reproduction, women don’t know the truth and do not care[…]
A man wants sex. A woman wants sex with investment, A man wants investment with ownership

In a K selected species, nature and nature’s God wants the transfer of resources from men to women, and from parents to children[…]without patriarchy, without male ownership of a woman’s sexual and reproductive services, without what the Duluth model calls abuse, sexual harassment, sexual assault, and rape, none of that is going to happen

Tutu #sexist #racist kiwifarms.st

Ladies, could we benefit from Man-Hate Threads for different races of men, like "White Man-Hate Thread", "Muslim Man-Hate Thread", "Indian Man-Hate Thread", "Australian Aboriginal Man-Hate Thread", etc.? That way, the racial aspect of male atrocities could be documented more precisely. Some would obviously be more active than others. Just suggesting because this topic causes a lot of disagreement and keeps coming up.
>inb4 "THAT'S TOO MANY HATE THREADS!!!"
Men deserve it

Pete Hegseth #wingnut #quack #sexist edition.cnn.com

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Wednesday that he is rolling out a new screening program for “testosterone deficiency” among troops, calling it necessary to allow them to operate at their “absolute best.”

The screenings will be conducted annually as part of service members’ required medical screenings for those 30 and older, he said. Troops under 30 can volunteer to be tested. In a video on social media, Hegseth said receiving testosterone replacement therapy would be voluntary.

When asked about what conditions Hegseth was looking to address with the new policy, the Pentagon referred to Hegseth’s remarks in the video that talked about keeping troops “strong, resilient and capable” and that the rigors of the modern battlefield demand “maximum psychological and mental readiness.”

Over the past several years, special operations troops — and specifically Navy SEALs — have come under scrutiny for their use of testosterone and similar substances to enhance performance.

The death of a SEAL recruit during training in 2022 led to a discovery of substances in his possession, including testosterone, and revealed far more rampant drug use among the elite program than was previously acknowledged.

A year after the recruit’s death, the Navy said it would begin a drug-testing program to screen for “any hormonal substance, chemically or pharmacologically related to testosterone, that promotes muscle growth.”

Hegseth said his new initiative is “not about artificial enhancement.”

The Pentagon did not respond to questions about what research or academic studies underpinned the move. It also didn’t say if female troops would be able to be screened for lowering estrogen as they entered perimenopause.

Andrew Wilson #sexist #fundie #psycho complex.com

A far-right Christian podcaster has gone viral after he completely lost his mind when a guest highlighted that his misogynistic worldview is contradicted by his life because his wife has children with three different men.

On a recent episode of the Whatever podcast, The Crucible host Andrew Wilson, who used to go by the name “Big Papa Fascist” and holds Christian Nationalist worldviews, crashed out when a young woman named Charlie pointed out his double standards. “I will never be able to convince you of my worldview, but the reason is not because I’m not a great orator, or I don’t make good points… Charlie, I just think, honestly, you’re too fucking stupid to understand,” said Andrew, as seen in the viral clip below.

“So, Andrew, can I sell you on my worldview? Your wife has three baby daddies and has been married twice before,” said Charlie, who was introduced in the episode as a leftist debater. “And you lick snizz,” he said, interrupting her. “You’re a fucking d*ke, don’t talk shit about my wife, you stupid bitch. Shut your fucking mouth. Shut your stupid bitch mouth.”

Charlie was unable to get out the rest of her point for a brief moment, as Andrew continued to throw homophobic slurs at her. “Is she morally inconsequential in comparison to your ditch licking?” he said, as he repeatedly talked over her and insulted her.

Anon #homophobia #sexist lolcow.farm

I know this website is generally pro-lesbian so there is a moral pressure to pretend they have a male equivalent for equality's sake, but you all need to stop this 90s fag "men have an ironclad innate sexuality" nonsense immediately.

Biologically there's no such thing as a man who's "gay" or "straight". They are social self-IDs, not objective responses to stimuli or even real world sexual behaviors. Any man can be conditioned into anything with the correct stimuli + enough time and repetition. Men also get more flexible and sexually "complex" with age, i.e. the longer they've been alive. Before technology the average male would not have encountered such a rapid escalation of sexual stimuli so early, so access to porn provides a truly brutal fast-forwarded model of male sexual hyperfunction beginning in childhood and extending past his reproductive prime.

Before someone mentions conversion therapy and inquires why it doesn't work - it's because coomditioning is a one way street, like time and entropy. You can't genuinely reverse the complexity of conditioned sexual responses to "youthful " vanilla default any more than you can reverse aging - at best it'll be a performance/mimicry. A moid factory reset is currently not possible, you can't put toothpaste back in the tube. Because of this, for example, a coomer who's into tranny zoosadist gloryholes can't be coomed into being vanilla by being repeatedly exposed to LESS distressing and stimulating content, much like you can't revert a fent addict into a codeine addict by having him do a weaker opioid. Even if he does eventually make an effort to stick with it, he will always be thinking about fent.

The relapse rates among nofap coomers are consistent with this reality. There is no way out. It is irreversible damage.

Amargi #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

We all know that men try to achieve immortality (Gyn/Ecology, Great Cosmic Mother) whereas gynocentric women tend to have a more accepting idea of the process of birth, growth, decay and death. I think female identified women also know intuitively when it’s the right time to create life and when it’s the right time to end it, or not create it at all.

IMO because males and females are literally different species (even according to mayl scientists) “EI” would look different for each of them. Or maybe it only applies to females and not at all to males, since they’re sort of like a large virus/parasite/not actually human in the first place. They’re just masquerading.

Cannabis Refugee #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

Mothers are Sluts and I am Fucking Sick of Their Bullshit. A Contrarian Mother’s Day Post.

Even in a non-patriarchal context, unless non-technological parthenogenesis has been achieved, creating a pregnancy would necessarily entail procuring sperm, and that normally means that a male somewhere has achieved orgasm which is usually considered pleasing to men. Human reproduction itself in every context may therefore be dependent on (or at least inexorably linked to) male-pleasing.

However, in a patriarchal context, the male-pleasing is even more clear and even more problematic, especially where and if mothers think that they are better than non-mothers, and that they hold a position of legitimate power and authority over anyone and Holy Shit, mothers do think that, don’t they? Mothers think they have a legitimate claim of authority over everyone, including their own children, other people’s children, and importantly over child-free women, who mothers regard as overgrown babies no matter how old or experienced we are. But this claim of authority is not based in anything legitimate, and maternal authority is therefore not a legitimate authority at all.

To wit, in my estimation, under the current paradigm, women become impregnated, and thus become mothers, under the following conditions: by engaging in heterosexual sex, which for females is a sexuality rather defined by pleasing men; through rape, which is also pleasing to men and which many men find indistinguishable from sex; and via patriarchal reproductive technologies, where women let Big Medicine and Western medical doctors torture and experiment on them, where males are known to enjoy torturing females, males, and nonhuman animals and they do it for sport, and have elevated torture to an artform. Women can also become “mothers” by stealing other women’s babies, which hardly cements their claim of legitimate authority over anyone.

Jim #fundie #conspiracy #homophobia #racist #sexist blog.reaction.la

[From “The Vatican schisms from Christianity yet again”]

The first time it was tragedy. This time around, it is farce

The first time, the Pope coveted that which is Caesar’s

This time around, men’s assholes[…]
The latest Pope has just excommunicated the Roman Catholic priesthood’s few remaining Christians

The postChristian churches are all rapidly dying, while the Christian churches are rapidly growing

If you attend a postChristian, postModern, church, there is no one left except those with one foot in the grave

Pretty soon the Pope speaking exCathedra will be yet another letterhead owned by Harvard

Which is going to force the remaining Christian priests of the Roman Catholic to adopt the protestant Catholic position, the high Anglican position, that anyone with valid Apostolic succession who is in a proper relationship with God can validly give someone else apostolic succession, analogous to early anarchic period of feudalism, when any knight[…]could give someone else that right[…]
In related news, Hollywood just cast an angry plains ape as Helen of Troy, and displayed the ape looking and acting like an ape in their trailer. Obviously that is not going to entice viewers to go see the movie[…]
The Pope has been performing insults to Christians and Christianity and attacks against Christians and Christianity in the same way Hollywood, Gillette, Budweiser, and Jaguar have been performing insults and attacks against their customers[…]
We have just had a schism in Anglicanism over priestesses, Orthodoxy over Globohomo, and now we have a schism in Roman Catholicism over the latin Mass. The latin mass dispute is actually a lavender mafia versus straight celibates schism[…]High fertility, high fidelity, non buggery, portions of the Church, are SSPX

The papacy is happy to keep the low fertility part[…]as churches, monasteries, and nunneries empty out, this allows them to sell off their real estate and snort coke off the bums of ladyboys

Emilio #sexist #dunning-kruger datasecretslox.com

I think it's worse than that. Niceness is detrimental to selection. Our culture fetishizes rude behavior from men, sanewashed under the label "confidence". Many women will go as far as, e.g., refusing to kiss any man, and disqualify all but those who go ahead and kiss her despite her refusal. Then be surprised that "all men" (who qualify) will also break other boundaries.

(I've been off the market for decades and I'm theorizing on vibes. Hopefully I'm wrong)

Angry Harry #sexist angryharry.com

Let's go for serving beer in a bar.
Should men and women get paid the same for serving beer in a bar if they work for the same hours and if they both do the job equally well?
Well, of course, I would say Yes.
But so-called 'equality' fanatics, like the feminists, might well disagree, as they keep drilling down in search for 'inequality'..
They might discover, for example, the following.
1. They might discover that more men than women do this job. And from this they could conclude that 'equality' between men and women has not been achieved.
2. The statistics might show that the women tend to spend more of their money on clothes for the job than do men, and that, therefore, women should be paid more - often by sneaking the money back to them through the tax system.
3. The statistics might show that women take more days off work for childcare reasons or for hormonal problems and so they ought to be compensated in some way for this.
4. The statistics might show that women spend more time mopping up the floor than do the men ...
And so on and on it can go.
My point is that the search for 'equality' can never end, and that in the process of searching for this impossible goal, the stirring up of male hatred is usually a major consequence - and, indeed, in the case of feminists, it is a purposeful aim.
Furthermore, given that 'equality' can never be achieved (even in simple matters to do with pay) the never-ending search for it by the feminists in all sorts of areas will forever involve the stirring up of hatred towards men in all sorts of areas.

Anon #sexist #god-complex #crackpot lolcow.farm

Patriarchy is born out of “egalitarianism”, the need of the male to forcefully get what is not his, to allow the inferior to survive and breed.
patriarchy is and has to be framed as the revolt of the inferior, who is inferior because it covets what the superior has, and in a predatory-parasitical fashion abuses the superior’s eusocial and agapic tendency towards forgiveness, generosity, and reciprocity for its own low needs.

if we truly were a blank state spoiled by system of oppression born out of the recursive ripple-like effect of initial differences in physical strength… why female secret service agents, who are stronger than the president, don’t rule the world? how come i enacted harm my pets or my little brother? it’s just a laughable idea, and a malicious one that is used to justify and enact oppression in the first place.
male wolves and killer whales are larger and stronger than their females: not a single one of them has ever been observed raping their female, let alone enacting the thousands of forms of abuse male humans enact…
most first-wave feminists were eugenicists because eugenics is the solution to these problems, even if it makes many people uncomfortable. you’d have to ask yourself why you have been taught your whole life to feel uncomfortable about this subject.

Stephen Miller #sexist #racist #transphobia #wingnut lgbtqnation.com

A White House official continued with attacks on Senate candidate and Texas state Rep. James Talarico’s (D) masculinity on Thursday evening, saying that he’s “transitioning to a woman,” that his blood is soy milk, and that he has less testosterone than Black Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-TX)[…]
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said earlier this week that Talarico is the Democrats’ “first transgender senate candidate.” The DNC’s X account called Miller an “ugly fuck” in response, and Stephen Miller’s wife, Katie Miller, had a public meltdown over the vulgarity of the response

But Miller isn’t letting up. Last night, he went on Fox News and told host Jesse Watters – who has a long history of discussing his personal insecurities with masculinity on air – that Talarico is “clearly transitioning into a female”

“When Talarico goes in for a blood test, when he gets a physical, blood doesn’t come out; instead, soy milk comes out,” Miller said flatly as Watters laughed hysterically. “This man has less testosterone than Jasmine Crockett. It is a mind-boggling choice”

Miller continued, joking that Talarico “doesn’t belong in the Senate but in a cabaret show”[…]
Miller then said that Texans are “some of the toughest, roughest, strongest men and women,” so they will naturally vote for “a real conservative, patriotic, god-fearing, and truly be loved statewide figure” like Paxton instead of “somebody with that much soy” like Talarico

Heteropositivity69 #sexist #crackpot tumblr.com

being with a man permanently irrevocably changes a woman, s***n has mind altering capabilities, having kids with an xy changes you forever since your body changes forever and part of his dna is now permanently attached to you, and the higher the number of men they've been with, the less value a woman has on the dating market, impacting her life forever

#no such thing as femdom#no such thing as casual straight sex#feminism#blackpill feminism#blackpill lesbian#daily blackpill#black pill feminism#radblr#radfem#terfblr#terfs do interact#terfs please interact

Verderebb #sexist #psycho twitter.com

Men are not human, women who love and defend men are compromised. Relationships with moids are degenerate. If women were smart they would have reduced the moid pop and domesticated them millenia ago.

It is not feminism that will redeem women but a catastrophe, but unlike what moids believe they will be the victims after centuries of over playing their hand.

Jim #sexist #racist #homophobia #pratt blog.reaction.la

[From “The Odyssey”]

Homer’s Odyssey is in large part about women, and about female virtue. And, of course, female wickedness and immorality

Penelope[…]is the archetype of the virtuous wife, Helen[…]and Clytemnestra[…]are archetypes of wicked wives

The Goddess Athena assists Penelope and Odysseus’s son

Calypso and Circe are the wicked seductresses

This extensive representation of women is, of course, profoundly anti feminist, presenting the uncompromising position that women should be chaste and faithful, and that the mistress should not seek to replace the wife

Odysseus represents the classic heroic virtues of prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance, which of course Hollywood cannot stand[…]
Predictably and inevitably, Hollywood’s 2026 Odyssey is an attack upon, and inversion of, Homer’s Odyssey

Which brings me to the armor[…]
The elites on the battlefield were literal knights in shining armor. They wore armor like a King wears his crown. Nolan did not like that

Nolan built actual ancient ships. Why not authentic looking armor? I conjecture this is just hatred of Europe[…]He gives Greek warriors ugly armor because he thinks Europe’s warrior tradition of manly heroism is oppression and injustice[…]
Helen of Troy is race swapped to represent the victims of colonialist and imperialist oppression[…]
As the Lord of the Rings movies depicted the Orcs as less than human, this movie depicts you[…]as less than human. The Greek soldiers oppressing Helen of Troy represent you and me oppressing Africa and Africans, enslaving blacks,and oppressing women and gays

In fact, of course, until the European set foot[…]the Africans lived in mud huts and ate each other, and when colonialism fell back, they resumed eating each other in substantial parts of Africa[…]
Hollywood has been losing money by attacking its audience. It will continue to attack its audience and continue to lose money because it hates its audience more than it loves money

Vox Day #sexist voxday.net

[From “A Passing Thought”]

The ideal role of woman is the cheerleader. The satanic inversion of the cheerleader is the critic

It’s fascinating to observe the way in which women not only fail to understand their power over men, but how they sabotage their own well-being by not only giving in to the inversive role, but doing it without even realizing they are doing so

The key, I think, is to understand that every man who isn’t an optimist with a gambling problem is perfectly aware of the fact that he could fail. It’s very, very easy to not do anything, to not try to succeed. Which is why it is imperative for the women in a man’s life to grasp that not only does a man have no need for a negative voice to balance his moments of optimism and inspiration, but that piling more negativity on top of his natural concerns, fears, and worries all but ensures that he will never take the risks required to level up

There are men who don’t need cheerleaders and who are basically impervious to criticism. I’m one obvious example of that, as my habit of devoting myself to things that literally no one wants or is asking for tends to demonstrate. But even I respond well to cheerleading and bristle at negativity and unhelpful, insubstantial criticism

And since so many people can’t seem to grasp what “unhelpful, insubstantial criticism” is, allow me to explain it to you. Before your criticize anything, ask yourself one question:

1) Is there anything that can be done about it now?

If the answer is no, then keep your mouth shut and say something vaguely polite and positive. Because nothing you say can change what is already done

Savanna Stone, Brooke Foxworthy and KayElah Gardner #wingnut #sexist #forced-birth #fundie cbc.ca

When Savanna Stone first started publicly sharing her support for U.S. President Donald Trump, she says it was a dealbreaker for some members of her extended family[…]
But what Stone said next was surprising

"I don’t even like Trump anymore, so it’s crazy"[…]
She was invited to be a keynote speaker at the Turning Point USA Women’s Leadership Summit, a three-day gathering held on the first weekend of June in San Antonio, Texas[…]
She says she doesn’t think women should vote, and that the U.S. should adopt a one-vote-per-household election system. Women tend to support more liberal candidates, she argues, so changing the voting system would result in a more Christian and conservative America

"That’s just one of the opinions that I hold, because I think that it would be better for society"[…]
"Now, is that a hill I'm going to die on and run for office and try to complete? No," she said. "That’s Ideal Savanna’s world; that’s not our current world"

Several women at the conference told CBC News that they'd be open to the idea, even if it meant losing their own right to vote — all in the pursuit of a more conservative country

"I think [Stone] has a very big point," said Foxworthy, the stay-at-home mom whose family recently moved to Texas

Foxworthy said she’s voted in every single election since she was 18 years old, and she plans to vote in the midterms coming up this fall. But she is open to the strategy

"If my husband is the head of the household, I am the neck, and we work very cohesively together," she said. "If he was voting on behalf of our household, I would be fine with that"

She said she'd even be comfortable if it meant her daughter lost her right to vote, as well[…]
KayElah Gardner said she'd give up her vote if it meant banning abortion

"I feel like with my mindset, I would want to put my vote in," said the 19-year-old nursing student from San Diego, Calif. "But … I think getting rid of that would actually help women more"

Jim #sexist #dunning-kruger #crackpot blog.reaction.la

[From “Women want fried ice”]

Women want what they do not want, and do not want what they do want

So it is fortunate that they do not act in a rational or goal directed manner[…]
Everyone longs for and seeks the ancestral environment of survival and successful reproduction[…]
It is the intention of nature and the will of nature’s God that resources shall be transferred from men to women[…]
No one will plant trees or build on land he does not own, so for the necessary transfer of resources to take place, women must be the property of men, and children must be the property of their mothers and fathers, the boys till they are old enough to become independent, the girls till they are old enough to become the property of their husbands

For a strongly K selected species, male ownership of women has to be part of the system[…]
For women, successful reproduction was accomplished when they were owned by a man, and used as his instrument of reproduction. In the ancestral environment, before agriculture, the stable isotope ratios in the bones indicate that humans lived primarily on meat, including the meat of other predators. We were the apex predator[…]And when I say “humans” were the apex predator, I mean of course, men[…]
Then we switched to agriculture. And when we were switching to agriculture, the sex disparity in reproduction went right up — with far fewer Y chromosome lineages being part of the reproduction pool than mitochondrial lineages. Which indicates that women lived off land that belonged to some man or to the men of a patrilineal clan[…]
If women responded rationally to the incentives of female emancipation, we would probably be in even worse shape than we are, because it is female irrationality that makes it possible to personally unemancipate women[…]
The reason that women do not like the Damsel in Distress trope is that men fantasize about winning righteously and virtuously, while women fantasize about the winners getting hold of them

Cannabis refugee ; marysunshineredux #sexist #psycho #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

(Cannabis refugee)

if human males were reduced to 10%, women could do something, but then we wouldn’t have to. we wouldn’t be oppressed, and feminism would be obsolete. we could do other things, but doing feminism, and trying to upend male supremacy would be unnecessary. can you imagine?

you are one of the elders who told me about women’s land mary. you saved me so much time.


(Marysunshineredux)

I have been many times to the magical Women’s Lands here in Australia. The few moments of my life that were worth living. 

Henry Makow PhD/Tony/James #sexist #wingnut #fundie #psycho #conspiracy henrymakow.com

1. Men want to have intercourse with every attractive woman they see. They're obsessed with planting the seed
but care little about the onerous moral and financial responsibility of fatherhood. Nature is wise.
If men did consider the consequences, they would never have sex.

2. The Illuminati have undermined heterosexual reproduction in order to replace us with robots. Feminism = depopulation.

3. Generally speaking, female self esteem depends on their value to men. Feminism convinced them that men are the enemy and families are "oppressive."

4. Wives and mothers are loved because of the sacrifices they make for their husbands and children. Do modern women think sex can replace that?
<...>
Comments for "Our Sex Drive is Our Stupidest Instinct"

<Tony>
But we can't get away from it because our owners want us to keep bringing new slaves to replace us in the plantation. That's the whole purpose for it. Generation after generation ad infinitum

<James>
Sex would have been perfect if we had been given a way to "turn off" the sex drive. Origen castrated himself, but that seems a little excessive.

The heart has a mind of its own, but so do the endocrines. IMO, the vast majority of people should never reproduce. Primarily because they're idiots.

I wish to God that my parents had never reproduced. IMO, humanity should have stayed on the land, kept its numbers small, and cared for the soil as though our lives depended on it. Because they do. Unfortunately, humanity has chosen to do the exact opposite and is now paying the price.

Anon #ableist #sexist #quack #crackpot #psycho lolcow.farm

I think BPDemons would mostly stop existing without males, too. Most BPDs have been understandably conditioned to feel insecure, because their attachments legitimately are insecure, and/or they were raised by mothers who were conditioned the same way. Obviously after living like that for enough time, you can’t ever go back to normal, but I bet if you disappeared men from earth, BPD would be “cured” within 2 generations.
BPD should be renamed born with penis disorder, because it’s a male patterned operative. Excessive fixation on external validation and acceptance, phobic of rejection, neurotic about maintaining attachments, constant shit testing to ensure security. Basically, describing a small gamete’s default relationship with a large gamete. BPD is just NPD without leverage, and NPD is what scrotes get when you artificially give control off the egg over to the sperm.

Misogyny and patriarchy basically flipped the roles of the sexes and forced women to be dependent on transactional male validation, which can be revoked at any point for any reason, and often is, and usually only manifests in exploitation. Males offload their BPD on women whenever they get the chance, and upgrade themselves to NPD. Remove males and the world will heal in more ways than you can imagine.

tiffytatortots #sexist #moonbat reddit.com

context: this was in response to a reasonable feminist man.

Oh seriously what a load of crock. First off this has nothing to do with feminism which is literally women being treated and seen as you know fucking human beings. it’s also very clear you’re NOT an ally so GTFO with that shit. The fact you started with “well feminism” shows the lack of good faith in your post and the fact you just want to come at women. Also you don’t get to come to a space for women and blame women for the actions of men. Saying that women are responsible for men being red pilled and misogynistic. That shit has been around since the beginning of time long before women even had a voice. So try again.

Women don’t have to coddle men because they get their feelings hurt for their own damn actions. Women have every right to feel the way we do and say it out loud. You’re lucky we only want equality and not revenge. If men don’t want to be called garbage don’t be garbage. Don’t be Misogynist pricks. It is MENS RESPONSIBILITY to fix this. It’s MENS responsibility to teach young men how to act. This isnt hard. Yet you guys still can’t figure it out and as usual you blame women instead of looking at yourself and doing and being better. Tale as old as time!

Also misandry isn’t a fucking thing either. Women are rightfully reacting to centuries of oppression from men. Women don’t oppress men. Women don’t control men. Women don’t control and regulate men’s bodies. Women don’t enact laws that hurt men. Women didn’t make men property. Women aren’t taking us back to the 1800 in current time.

So instead of sitting here playing the victim, which you’re not, stop and say to yourself hey why do women, feel the way they do about us? What are WE doing that makes women feel unsafe, not want to be around us, and so on. I’m so sick of reading shit like this.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Gym bros will often pressure women to workout to artificially chase and “earn” their affection, but fat ugly scrotes usually inflict cost on women (making her uglier, fatter, more burdened, basically sucking her life force until she is too fatigued to leave) to keep women artificially chasing and “earning” their affection.
Both suffer from normative male retardation, insecurity, and pussy scarcity neuroticism, and will focus on their particular method of mate acquisition and retention strategies, at the woman’s expense.
We need to stop assuming gymbros are demons until proven human, while offering fat ugly scrotes the benefit of the doubt and assuming them to be human until proven demons.

If you assume all men are equally demonic by default, then you would just choose the hot one, if both are already going to drag you to hell. With fat ugly scrotes you are still subjected to hellish treatment, but you also have to deal with a walrus routinely humping over your dried out pussy.
I don’t believe women are actually objectively attracted to fat ugly scrotes, they’re just attracted to the humanity they incorrectly assume they have.
That and the women who have been psyopped into believing male validation really is the highest achievement in life for a woman, and think a fat ugly mould will be grateful to be blessed by her beautiful presence, and that other male-centered women are less likely to poach her source of male validation (which isn’t even true because these validation starved women are all trying to do the same thing).

Hot, mid, and ugly moids all have the same predatory, exploitative approach when it comes to relationships with women, but also the same weaknesses. You are unlikely to get genuine love from any man, but I’d rather abuse and groom a hot moid into being useful company, rather than waste time trying to convince a chimp to love me, especially an ugly one.

Weaklystupendousimpqueen #sexist tumblr.com

This study largely validates the theory of the case that femcels describe when it comes to the cultural power of lookism and pretty privilege on women’s lives and destroys the rival theory of male incels that lookism primarily affects them. These findings make it extremely clear that lookism impacts the lives of women, NOT moids, and thus the suffering of male incels is, in fact, more or less entirely owed to their sparkling personalities and behaviors, NOT their outward appearance like they disingenuously claim.

The fact is that millenia of male sexual selection (moids largely controlling who fucks who and thus gets to reproduce what sets of genes) has rendered the average woman attractive to her average male counterpart, but not vice versa: most moids are on the ugly side to most women, so women learn to develop comparatively low standards when it comes to the physical attractiveness of their partners. Under male sexual selection, the female sex is not only held to higher standards of beauty, but also more or less her entire social worth is determined by her outward appearance.

EDIT: Look at that, I's made ten posts here. Another life goal achieved!

#bio essentialism#i hate moids