Not nearly as smart as they think they are

Anonymous #racist #dunning-kruger desuarchive.org

If I'm mixed black white how will I do with japanese girls?
is there any hope?

Japanese girls have melanin receptors inside their vaginas that are wired to distress neurons. Basically, the more melanin your body has the less pleasurable it will be, which is why Jap girls prize white men (especially gingers)

It was only a matter of time

Incels tread new, even lower ground: cannibalism.

Neggr #crackpot #psycho #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Blackpill] Becoming chad by consuming their bodies?

I mean, there is nothing to stop me from going to a grave to a newly died chad, digging it out, carrying it to a remote place, make a campfire and eat his corpse. Would that make my bones grow, I mean his genes is floating into my body, my body might be able to learn the code and grow my own chad body+face.

David J. Stewart #fundie #dunning-kruger jesusisprecious.org

A Multitude of Crimes Are Committed Every Time There is An Abortion

When a person commits a crime, they are never charged with just that one crime; but rather, they are indicted with a series of related charges. Literally, you can go into a gas station with a gun, rob it, and end up being charged with a dozen crimes! God does the same thing! He must, because more than one crime is ALWAYS committed when ANY crime is committed.

In Criminal Law, there are SEVEN ELEMENTS OF A CRIME that are considered by the courts when a crime is committed. (I am going to apply these to a woman who consents to undergo an abortion, which if tried in a legitimate court of law would send her to the electric chair for first-degree murder):

1. MENTAL STATE (Every mother knows exactly what she is doing by having an abortion—committing murder!)
2. CONDUCT (Exodus 20:13, “Thou shalt not kill.”)
3. CONCURRENCE (Abortions are scheduled—clearly proving that there was an intent to commit murder!)
4. CAUSATION (A definite crime has been committed—a human being has been brutally murdered!)
5. SEE ALSO (Ecclesiastes 12:13, “For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.”)
6. REFERENCES (Ecclesiastes 12:13)
7. EXTERNAL LINKS (Ecclesiastes 12:13)

I assure you that God is more righteous than mankind. Be forewarned dear reader—OUR RIGHTEOUS GOD WILL JUDGE UNGODLY SINNERS, FOR THEIR UNGODLY DEEDS, WHICH THEY HAVE UNGODLY COMMITTED, IN THIS UNGODLY NATION!!! Hebrews 10:31, “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.”

Dr. Stella Immanuel #fundie #crackpot #dunning-kruger #quack nydailynews.com

Dr. Stella Immanuel blasted Facebook and Twitter after it removed her controversial video touting hydroxychloroquine as a “cure” for COVID-19.

The Houston physician, who went viral for her video, declared on Twitter that Jesus Christ would destroy Facebook’s servers if her videos weren’t restored to the platform.

“Hello Facebook put back my profile page and videos up or your computers with start crashing till you do,” she tweeted overnight. “You are not bigger that God. I promise you. If my page is not back up face book will be down in Jesus name”

In the clip, allegedly filmed during a “White Coat Summit” in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., the self-proclaimed “Deliverance Minister” stands with a group of doctors who praised hydroxychloroquine and said how masks and lockdowns are not needed to stop the spread of the novel coronavirus.

“Hello, you don’t need a mask. There is a cure,” Immanuel said in the video.

According to the Texas Medical Board, Immanuel is a licensed pediatrician — and also recognized as religious minister, who has a long history of making bizarre claims about medical topics and other controversial issues.

On Tuesday, The Daily Beast published an extensive collection of some of Immanuel’s sermons and articles posted on her website, describing them as “definitely ludicrous.”

She refers to herself as “God’s battle axe and weapon of war” and claims that medical issues like endometriosis, cysts, infertility, and impotence are caused by sex with “spirit husbands” and “spirit wives,” a phenomenon described essentially as witches and demons having sexual intercourse with people in a dreamworld.

"They turn into a woman and then they sleep with the man and collect his sperm,” Immanuel said, according to the outlet. “Then they turn into the man and they sleep with a man and deposit the sperm and reproduce more of themselves."

“They are responsible for serious gynecological problems,” Immanuel said. “We call them all kinds of names — endometriosis, we call them molar pregnancies, we call them fibroids, we call them cysts, but most of them are evil deposits from the spirit husband,” Immanuel said in 2013. “They are responsible for miscarriages, impotence — men that can’t get it up.”

The outlet claims to have also found that in 2015 Immanuel claimed that an Illuminati plan had been concocted by “a witch” to destroy the world using abortion, gay marriage, and children’s toys.”

BummerDrummer #sexist #racist #wingnut #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Based] the vast majority of people are stupid and I am smarter than them

1. Half of the world is females, so that's given to me.
2. Anyone socially left is a fucking idiot, so there's another big chunk cut off.
3. There's faggot conservacucks who still want womens rights and equal rights for everyone, so bye-bye.
4. Brb, cutting out fuckheads who think democracy needs to exist and is a good system (Pro tip: it's not because of the fucking idiots from 1, 2, and 3)
5. People who think races are the same and "It's just skin color bro there's no difference bro" (Not in a supremacist viewpoint, but in the point of regardless of supremacy all races are different, look at fucking skull shapes for example and tell me it's just skin)
6. People not awake to the Jewish Question
7. People not nihilist/blackpilled

I am smart as shit. I could not imagine having irl friends because 99.9% of the people in my area are described by even half or a quarter of this list. As an incel[1], considering you are A: Male and B:Atleast somewhat blackpilled you are smarter than atleast 60-90% of the population. It would be a complete brain drain to have some faggot normoid who has a "panic attack" every time you look at him slightly the wrong way as a friend, or to have a braindead foid as a friend. Would be crippling to my mental wellbeing

tchower #racist #pratt #conspiracy #dunning-kruger archive.is

Germany is so afraid of being associated with any form of racism or patriotism that they’d rather have racist, homophobic, misogynistic and bigoted Muslims rape and dominate their nation who favor their race over Germans. The interesting thing is, the US actually didn’t even want to fight Germany in world war 2. We just had to fight Japan and happened to be dragged into Europe and the Soviet Union’s problems! My grandparents fought in WW2 and have passed away, but hated Japan, and never said a word about Germany and what happened. It’s just all the Jews who run the money system in the US made a really big deal about the holocaust, even though the same thing happened in Asia to the Chinese, and whites being murdered and raped and sent to death camps in the Soviet Union by Jews. Since the Jews favor their own race over all others, the Jews ignored what the Japanese did and the white genocide organized by Jews in the Soviet Union. The Jewish role was critical for the formation of the Soviet Union and the genocide of more whites than Jews in the holocaust.

Ralph Serr #dunning-kruger twitter.com

Water/air is an element. As is fire and "earth". You can't explain what water is made of, just like you can't explain what fire is made of. They say fire = energy. They say earth = dirt. But look outside the box. Where am I going at with all this?

That the atom model is a lie.

Mainländer #wingnut #sexist #dunning-kruger incels.co

People don't consent to being born in this world through the sexual actions (often irresponsible ones, to boot) of others.

People don't consent to being ethnic or racemixed (just take a look at how most people here feel about belonging to those ethnicities), which is something progressive leftists like you promote. White birth rates are plummeting for years now while ethnic, black and mixed birth rates go up year by year.

People don't consent to being raised by single mothers, stepfathers, and other disfuncional arrangements. I sure as hell didn't. Another thing people like you promote.

People don't consent to being forced by the government to pay taxes, many of which fund things people strongly disagree with such as benefits to single moms (statistically one of the most benefited demographics by taxation). And before you say something like "oh but men benefit from tax money too!", learn what statistics mean, you dumb fuckers. If I give you 100 bucks and you give me 50 bucks back, in the end I gave you 50 bucks. This is how the men and women situation regarding taxes is; men pay more into the system, women benefit more.

Many entrepreneurs don't consent to being forced by the governments to hire a certain quota of women, paying maternity leave to them, etc.

I could go on.

So the point is, regarding my other thread and the responses it got, don't pretend having your breast touched is something serious, a heinous crime that should result in the man going to jail and having his life destroyed over if you're an immoral promiscuous slut who likes being violently humiliated during sex. You have no morals to pretend being a prude and having your breast touched is fucking nothing compared to all the other consent violation examples I talked about here.

If a male heavyweight pro fighter complained to the police about having been slapped on the face by a woman and wanted her to go to jail over it, everyone would laugh at him. So this is basically the same.

ScreechingTsuchinoko #dunning-kruger reddit.com

Being a NEET is way harder than being a normal productive member of SOYciety and should be rewarded

Coronavirus has affected the world and people are literally dying to return to their Normie lifestyles. They literally risk their lives just to meet up with their buddies. This shows that being NEET is a very difficult skill that should be rewarded with the highest of compensations. The NEET is truly hard working and a miracle of nature. NEETs should be compensated with salaries akin to the top one percentile of wageslaves. Also, what they do not understand is that NEETing is actually productive, NEETing is actually a social justice activity in which we use the powers of Autism to rebel against the evils of SOYciety.

Brett Stevens #elitist #wingnut #dunning-kruger #elitist amerika.org

While the coronavirus first seemed as if it would serve as an acceptable scapegoat for the failure of Leftism — diversity failing, equality creating enmity, mass incompetence of democracy, pollution threatening lives, food and water stocks failing, and war looming — the divisions in our population emerged.

We can see two groups: the unisonists, who want us all to do the same methods in unison so that no one gets ahead of anyone else, and the naturalists, who want us to each find our niche and for natural selection to trim the weak from among us while promoting the strong so we get stronger as a group.

Unisonists come from the oldest human impulse, fear. They fear that someone has something that they do not. They fear that their own inability to achieve the same thing will place them at a lower rank. In fact, they know they are lesser than others, but want to use the power of the herd to obliterate that.

The naturalists accept that there is an order larger than the self, that we all fit within it, and that we have a niche in it, both in terms of vertical rank and specialization. They do not look for universal truths and rules; they want to find something that works for them.

Right now, the naturalists have accepted risk because they recognize that life is uncertain and things sometimes turn out badly. It is better, they think, to have a functional civilization with some deaths than a dysfunctional civilization with slightly fewer deaths.

rightfulcel #dunning-kruger #sexist incels.co

[LifeFuel] Calling women toilets is the most high iq idea ever

Normies are so brian dead they struggle to connect the dots completely. They are so autistic they are like "LOL women aren't toilets" while ignoring what we just said. Instead of being angry about the posts they go straight to that because it requires no energy. Also toilet is offensive and funny also true I might add. Lol at normies.

Patrick Mcgean #quack #psycho #dunning-kruger janeknowitall1.wordpress.com

Thomas as a researcher of 47 years vaccines do cause autism, the heavy metals used as preservatives including mercury form amyloid plaque in the blood brain barrier. Same vaccine caused damage in seniors who present with Alzheimer’s. Can not slip past the blood brain barriet including oxygen because virologist are pedophiles with don’t
sue me rider to their research.
For Jane and Thomas the damage of radiation exposure, autism and Alzheimer’s can be reserved by sulfating the trash of man and those in white coats out of the biology of man, women, children but researchers like your self their is ho hope you know it all.
Be careful Thomas there are mothers out there who could hurt you for
for your expert ignorance. Visit Paul Offit on Facebook he holds your
opinion all the way to the bank.
Man causes autism, if necessary we will obliterate such men, and hang
all of the chemists as is the Judgement of Nuremberg.
The Cellular Matrix Study has 29 formerly autistic children whose mothers have their lives back and could be found in the bushes waiting
for Dr. Death Paul Offit to head home into harms way. Mother can buy
ropes and Pennsylvania has hanging trees.
The one percent ends on my watch, and not one tear shall be shed in their passing, good riddance.
Jane who knows it all, post this, any child can come back with eye contact, the beginning of communication and sulfur in the diet of mother and child.
Those who support vaccine are scardy cats and pedophiles. What we
do to pedophiles in the West is castrate them and we kick the living shit of them. Many have died but few compared to the damage done.
Those who screw with our children will soon under the Agents of the
Crystalline Matrix when we string you up with no pomp or circumstances. Pedophile deserve to die, we can help them to cease breathing.

organicsulfur@sisna.com is for the mothers of vaccine damaged children who want their lives back and their child back, something Thomas believes is impossible because he is a researcher.

Andrew Sabisky (Former adviser to Boris Johnson) #wingnut #racist #elitist #dunning-kruger theguardian.com

If the mean black American IQ is (best estimate based on a century’s worth of data) around 85, as compared to a mean white American IQ of 100, then if IQ is normally distributed (which it is), you will see a far greater percentage of blacks than whites in the range of IQs 75 or below, at which point we are close to the typical boundary for mild mental retardation. Typically criminals with IQs below 70 cannot be executed in the USA, I believe.

That parsimoniously explains the greater diagnostic rates for blacks when it comes to ‘Intellectual disability’.

ss-standartenfuhrer #conspiracy #dunning-kruger deviantart.com

Holocaust survivors are like zombies. After all, that's how they survived—right? If they look like zombies even sixty years after the war, like Elie Wiesel, all the better. It makes their horror tales all the more compelling. They are still human, at least partially—but they have been programmed to lie with great skill omitting inconvenient facts in order to boost the holocaust mythology. And of course, avoid serious questioning by people who are not totally sympathetic and programmed themselves. How dare anyone ever doubt their stories. It all brings them endless rewards. It also excuses the crimes and real atrocities of their fellow Jews, especially in the Middle East.

When you begin doubting their stories and apply some objectivity you'll notice that...

Holocaust survivors are like Coca-Cola. They are everywhere! When I was much younger, I believed as most people believed that only a tiny handful of Jews "survived." To actually meet a "survivor" was like seeing that rare person who had actually come back from the dead. After the Schindler's List movie became successful, Steven Spielberg began making video recordings of "survivors." The numbers of such recordings quickly grew into the tens of thousands—and then one began seeing statistical studies from Jews showing that the numbers of "survivors," alive even into the twenty-first century, were well into the hundreds of thousands. Such numbers mean that the numbers of "survivors" at the end of WW2 must have been in the millions. Can one continue to believe that only those capable of hard work as slaves were allowed to survive? Of course, not!

The truth is that the existence of concentration camps merely shows that the Germans intended to keep certain people alive albeit under tight control. For mass murder, there is no need for concentration camps unless one wants countless eyewitnesses. Simply look at how the Soviets carried out their mass murders. No camps, no gas chambers just a bullet. Millions upon millions of people were liquidated in this manner by the Bolsheviks and these murders never took place in a location where eye witnesses would be a factor.
Some of these victims, if they were lucky enough, received show trials that only accomplished a minor delay of the inevitable if anything at all.

Even back then there existed factual evidence that showed...

1. U.S. and German top-level government officials talked with each other through Swiss and Irish consuls in 1944 and '45 about the condition of inmates in German-operated camps,

2. In 1944 German officials denied any intention to mass-murder inmates,

3. Germany guaranteed to evacuate inmates ahead of Soviet advance,

4. Former camp inmates confirmed inmates were being safely evacuated.

In addition, there are scans of two letters between the Allies and Germany regarding the disposition of the inmates from Auschwitz-Birkenau! The Nazis really were the "Good Guys." Get used to it, folks!

Despite this widely known evidence during that time, the lie still persisted. Despite the enormous amount of evidence available today, this lie still persists. With all the research and scientific evidence which undoubtedly proves that the revisionists won, we're still seeing and hearing from people who claim to be survivors.
And this is why I'm going to put 10 simple questions for those who claim to be survivors below...

1. When did you enter a concentration camp or labor camp and when did you leave?

2. How old were you when you entered?

3. What job skills did you have if any?

4. What did you actually do throughout your incarceration in such camps?

5. Were you fed and how often?

6. Were you given shelter?

7. Were you given clean clothing and how often?

8. Were you ever too ill to work and were you given medical care?

9. For how long were you ever unable to work?

10, Why do you believe the Germans had ever wanted to kill you?

So, the next time you see a comment posted somewhere from somebody either claiming to be a survivor or a relative of one, you can ask some of these questions. It isn't rude because certainly no one would ever claim to be something that they aren't, right?

David J. Stewart #fundie #conspiracy #racist #homophobia #dunning-kruger jesusisprecious.org

Please notice the All Seeing Eye in the capstone of the pyramid to the right. Think about a peephole in a wall or fence. By looking through the peephole, you can see everything happening on the other side of the barrier; but the people on the other side cannot see anything except your eye, if they notice it. The eye represents occult enlightenment. The pyramid represents the human governments of this world and the masses of humanity. The detached capstone represents the Luciferian elite (aka, the Illuminati or Globalists) who control the major events of this world; such as, all major world wars since the Revolutionary War. The United States was founded by occult Freemasons, who have been plotting a world government since its inception. Retired Canadian Navy commander and prolific author, William Guy Carr (1895-1959), rightly calls it the World Revolutionary Movement in his books. I highly recommend Pawns In The Game and The Conspiracy for a crash course. Also, Alex Jones (in his better days) produced a powerful movie explaining the history of the now forming New World Order, called, “END GAME.”

Little do unsuspecting Americans realize that the Luciferian elite are responsible for countless evils; including, the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks in 2001, the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre hoax in 2012, banning the Holy Bible from public schools since 1963, teaching the blatant lies of Evolution since 1936, the fraudulent Federal Reserve Banking System since 1913, deliberate open U.S. borders for decades, the deindustrialization of the U.S., legalized abortion since 1973, legalized same-sex marriages since 2015, the fraud of 501c3 government licensing of churches since 1954, open Satanism in the U.S. entertainment industry, the corrupt U.S. court system and their puppet U.S. Supreme Court, the fraudulent non-existent War On Drugs, the reprobate Emerging Church Movement, fraudulent manmade Israel since 1948 and the heresy of religious Zionism (facilitated by dispensational teaching), and innumerable other diabolical deceptions and evils. By God's grace, I have spent the past 17 years since 2002 when I began my internet ministry, diligently researching these matters and much more, seeking nothing but THE TRUTH, and nothing but the truth. Matthew 10:16, “Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.”

I am laying a brief foundation for you, getting to the point, keeping it simple, for your benefit dear reader. Now having told you what I have this far, please carefully view the following popular media images. I could literally show you THOUSANDS more such images, but these will be sufficient to convince you that Luciferians are behind the scenes to kill, steal and destroy your family. Carefully notice the single ALL SEEING EYE (the same as on the back of every U.S. one dollar bill)...

ABOVE: All of these occult images ought to convince you that something big is going on, that permeates the entire entertainment industry, government, business, religion and every facet of life today in the world. In particular, notice Max Lucado's book cover, that features an occult pyramid with a detached capstone. All these people are expressing their loyalty and support for the coming Antichrist, whose eye will be darkened according to Zachariah 11:17, “Woe to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock! the sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye: his arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened.” Actor Kevin Spacey is making a 666 symbol with his fingers. The image of Jesus is a popular Catholic picture called, "The Image Of Divine Mercy," featuring an Illuminati Pyramid with detached capstone formed by the Lord's belt. These are all occult symbols and manifestations of the spirit of Satan.

If you think I'm reaching, check out The eye of God over in Palestine, at the alleged place where Christ was born in Bethlehem. Someone placed a Masonic occult symbol at the sight, called, “THE EYE OF GOD!” ...

ABOVE: A screenshot from the awesome movie, “Beyond Jordan,” by Pastor Steven L. Anderson. This All Seeing Eye is called “The Eye Of God,” which was placed here as a tribute at the place were Jesus Christ was allegedly born in Bethlehem. This is the eye of the god of this world, Satan! Clearly, the occult saturates the entire world. Anytime you see the All Seeing Eye or The Great Pyramid, think Satan!

Allure #quack #conspiracy #dunning-kruger liebeisstleben.de

(Translated from the original German by submitter)

The Catastrophe of Mainstream Medicine – The Spanish Flu 1918 A Fake Pandemic

102 years ago, at the end of WW I, the first mass vaccinations were performed. Immediately afterwards, a previously unknown disease surfaced which brought death to ca. 100 million peope.

Later, it became known as “the Spanish Flu”. But if you read from the ancient books of doctors of those times gone by, the picture of the Influenza pandemic appears completely different:

In truth, it was the vaccinations,
which caused those countless deaths.

They simply deny that these mass vaccinations happened back then, they portray the testimonies of witnesses of the time as a conspiracy theory, and all is well again for the religion of vaccination and its faithful adherents.

The only problem is that this catastrophe of mainstream medicine, which began in the USA, where most of the CONTEMPORARY WITNESS accounts come from as well, cannot be covered up forever.


While pharmacological medicine and hospitals using pharmacological (“allopathic”) treatments lost 33% of their influenza patients, non-pharmacological hospitals such as BATTLE-CREEK, KELLOGG and MACFADDEN’S Health-Sanitorium achieved nearly 100% recovery, and they did so with their water cures, baths, enemas etc., with fasting cures and other simple methods of healing, followed by carefully planned diet schedules with natural food.


Today we know that polio is a common side effect of vaccine poisonings. Those who stayed home did not contract polio until the global vaccination campaign of 1918.


WW I lasted a relatively short time. Consequently, vaccine producers were not able to sell their entire stockpile. But, as they were (and still are) driven by profit, they decided to offer the vaccines to the rest of the public.

Thus, they started the greatest vaccination campaign in US history.

There were no epidemics to justify it. Nevertheless, they used other tricks. Their propaganda claimed that soldiers would return from foreign lands with all sorts of disease and that everyone would have to get all vaccinations available on the market.

People believed them, firstly because they wanted to believe their doctors, and secondly because the returning soldiers had indeed become sick. But they did not know that the latter were iatrogenic diseases due to vaccinations, as the army doctors did not like to tell the of such things.

Many of the returning soldiers were crippled for life by these diseases caused by vaccination.

Many of them went insane due to the post-vaccine encephalitis, but the soldiers called it “shell shock” even though many of them never left American soil.

The conglomerate illness caused by the various toxic vaccines left the doctors speechless. This new disease they had created had the symptoms of all the diseases they had injected into the men.

High fever, extreme weakness, abdominal rashes and disturbed bowels, as typical for typhoid fever. The diphtheria vaccine caused excessive lung inflation, feeling of coldness and fever, a swollen painful throat, disrupted by the artificial membrane, and through difficult breathing and heavy wheezing even death from asphyxiation, whereupon the body blackened with stagnant blood, drained of oxygen during the phases of asphyxiation. Once, it was called the “Black Death” The other vaccines caused their own reactions – paralysis, brain damage, tetanus, etc.

When the doctors tried to suppress the typhoid symptoms with an even stronger vaccines, they caused a type of typhoid fever they called typhus they called paratyphoid. Yet as they concocted yet another vaccine, yet again more potent and dangerous than before, to suppress the results of the other vaccine, they created a disease far more terrible, for which they had no name at first.

They did not want to tell the population what it really was – their own Frankenstein’s monster they had created with their vaccines and their symptom-suppressing medicaments.

They wanted to deflect the fault from themselves,
and thus, they finally named the disease “Spanish Influenza”.

So much of the factual accounts from those times of sorrow. Now the vaccination-believers can prattle again as much as they can and talk away, twist and bend all the facts in concordance with their orthodoxy, until their illusion of a “Just World” is restored.

le sequoit #dunning-kruger #moonbat dailykos.com

["I don’t see what is that hard to understand about my stance on this. My degree is in biomedical science. That doesn’t mean that I have all the answers; obviously, I don’t.
However, I don’t want someone who has either no degree, or potentially a degree in political science deciding such matters, with no scientific basis to back it."]

Funny how scientists, who once thought the world was flat and bile made us bilious, substitute “basis” for “belief” and expect this will establish them on the rational high ground.

EnglishVids #crackpot #dunning-kruger #fundie boards.christogenea.org

[From "100 Proofs the Israelite's Were White"]

The America Flag's 13 stripes are the 13 tribes of Israel

Before Israel even conquered the lands of Canaan it was already prophesied that one day Israel would have a new land. It would seem that God never intended it to be a permanent dwelling.

This new land is none other than America where the scattered lost tribes abroad finally regathered all together from Europe as one nation. Which overtime became the single greatest most prosperous nation ever to exist on earth.

Although Jacob (Israel) originally only had 12 sons, which later became the 12 tribes of Israel, we must remember that Joseph the 11th son, received a double portion and passed this inheritance onto his own two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh. Jacob made them his own sons and blessed them, thus making it a total of 13 tribes.

All Apostles have Traditional English names

Were the Apostles called Tyrone or Jasmin? How about Abu or Wang? No!

The names you commonly see over and over again are John, James, Matthew, Mary, Simon, Peter, Paul and so forth. The Apostles had traditional White names which carried on throughout Europe, to Britain and America over the centuries.

This is because the Apostles were White! Jesus was White and all Israel has always been white.

European Pagan God's derive from the Old Testament

As the Israelite's dispersed into Europe you'd expect to be able to trace a lot of their Pagan believes back to the original teachings of the Old Testament. Many European Pagan religions have the enemy being a Great Serpent. Along with evil Giants.

If you understand that the Serpent is not a literal serpent but simply all the evil races the descendants of Cain and the Genesis 6 corruptions, all together as a figurative Serpent. Whilst the Giants appeared amongst them, such as in the lands of Caanan. You can see it's the same story as the Bible, it's the same people the Israelites passing on there oral traditions

Wodin, or Odin It's clear that is a derivation of the Hebrew Adon, which means Lord. Our people always had a problem of deifiing ancient Kings. Odin was a king who led the Germanic tribes into Europe. He was just a man he existed.

Loki It's clear that is a derivation of Lucifer. Originally the C was hard so Luckifer or Lucky/Loki for short. In others Satan the father of the evil races, the head of the Great Serpent

In the end times a great battle Ragnarok would take place where the son of God, sometimes called Thor who return and we would all rise up together and fight this evil serpent race together.

Is that not exactly what the Bible teaches, Christ returning to save his people in the Armageddon. There are many more similirities. It all shows the Germanic tribes were the dispered Israelites and they were white.

realtsuke #psycho #wingnut #dunning-kruger reddit.com

[on Trump’s pardon of Edward Gallagher]

im still for the pardon though my views are different from most. I disagree with the concept of war crimes entirely. I believe War should be where the ugliest side of mankind is shown. So ugly that people would refrain from ever engaging in it except as a last resort. When we sanitize war with all sorts of pretty rules we make it easier for countries to engage in it. As a result the default became a state of war and only periods of peace was the exception whereas in the past the default was peace with short brutal wars the exception.

edit: in order to preemptively answer questions yes genocides and everything else should be part of war. Both sides should know that they risk everything in war so they will peace out as fast as possible

Time Transportal #wingnut #conspiracy #dunning-kruger timetransportal.com

Another example of a Q puzzle is COVFEFE. That strange word tweeted by President Donald Trump on 5.31.2017.

Question: What is a subject that is considered negative by many people and is often mentioned as a negative thing by mostly alternative media? That's: 5G. And what is causing a feeling of negative press to the human body and mind? That's: 5G.

In this tweet by Donald Trump there's no mention of 5G whatsoever, but it seems to be a large piece of the puzzle.

The letters COV are in COVFEFE and in COVID-19.

The planet Earth is in a global coronavirus, also known as COVID-19 pandemic situation. Many people are inside their homes. And many governments and phone companies want to install 5G in cities and other places, even during this crisis situation. There are even rumors about 5G being installed during the lock-down of cities. Various online videos are showing that this seem to happen. There's a lot of resistance against the plans for 5G poles, boxes and streetlights. And there's evidence that 5G is in fact a weaponized grid system, you can look this all up online.

But when everybody have to stay inside and the regulations make it impossible for the people organize with more than two people in public, then a protest against 5G is very difficult these days, in a corona daze.

So coronavirus or COVid-19 is symbolically connected with 5G.

Some Q Anons have found out that Trump's COVFEFE is about the possibility to de-weaponize 5G. To make the electromagnetic waves more friendly, so to speak.

Linear Formula: FeCoV / CoFeV

Compound Formula CoFeV
Molecular Weight 165.72
Appearance Metallic solid in various forms (plate, bar, sheet, sputtering target, powder)
Melting Point 1427 °C
Boiling Point N/A
Density 8.12 g/cm3

Source: americanelements.com

Is Trump's COVFEFE tweet actually a warning for COVID-19 and the 5G install plans? Did he tweeted a formula to neutralize the dangers of 5G radiation?

Total Imbecile #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Serious] I have a 10/10 brain

I think I might legit be the most mentally stable person to ever exist

-literally immune to mental illness, cannot ever feel depressed for example

-average to slightly below average IQ with superior critical thinking and analytical abilities (actually have an engineering degree, finished in like top 5% in both hs and college)

-hyper aware of everything even my own flaws (literally understand that some of the shit I post is vile and wrong but the bottom line is it doesnt matter so I dont care)

-insane level of self control (0 addictions, never needed meds, quit watching porn cold turkey, can quit posting on this forum on demand)

Brainwise and mentally Im literally the ideal human, but all of it is pointless and meaningless, I wish I could be a mentally ill Chad who shoots up heroin and commits rape at frat parties because he cannot control himself like an animal

Dunning-Kruger Award

Wristlet 2 #dunning-kruger #quack incels.co

[Serious] Psychology as a uni degree is fucking stupid, since psychology can't be taught like that. Incels know more about suffering than any therapist.


People insists on making everything about credentials, diagnosis, college degrees... You mention you or somebody you know has mental issues, and the first thing normies ask is "is it diagnosed?", you mention a psychological concept that you've observed or learned, and they'll ask "where did you read that?" or may say "well a psychologist may know best" or something like that. You come up with a scientific law over endless consistent observations of the same pattern in several different contexts (the blackpill), and to normies it's not real science, because we're not sciencists, even though actual psychologists and psychiatrists are bluepilled and clueless as fuck.

To society, this doesn't matter. They make everything about official certifications, degrees, diagnoses etc. This may seem like a good thing, or something civilized to do, but actually, it's in line with a tribal instinct that's as old as time. What those credentials in general boil down to is social recognition, and the fact that people cares more about social recognition than the truth. In fact, to them, social consensus literally defines the truth.

This makes sense in the case of, for example, a doctor or a chemist. If they have a degree it means they've studied a lot of stuff on the field so it makes sense to trust them. However, in the case of psychology it's just retarded.

My therapist is clueless tbh. I go to her because it's free and to vent, but 3 sessions in, I can already tell there's no way this woman will be able to help me out. She's way in over her head, and I know a lot more than her tbh. Only way this person may be helpful is if you're a full normie and have never dealt with any adversity (or did suffer but didn't learn anything) and are completely unprepared, then sure, a therapist's knowledge may be a godsend.

Literally reading Elliot Rodger's manifesto is better therapy than any therapist for any incel. Or this forum. And this is because the idea of psychology as a college degree, aka teaching a bunch of beckys and stacys who live in tutorial mode about psychological concepts, people's feelings, how to help those who suffer, is just impossible, or at least the way they do it in college (memorization) is just wrong. It's just absurd tbh. You can't teach this stuff, only people who actually suffers knows what it's like. For example, even if the blackpill was socially recognized as true, chads and stacys could superficially learn it, as in memorize the concept, but they'd never know the true meaning of "brutal" or "suifuel" as they've never felt it, nor would they never truly understand what the blackpill is about or its implications. This is why therapy is bullshit.

Only way therapy for incels would work is if we were assigned an older or higher IQ incel as some sort of coach, or an ascended but blackpilled incel. And of course free whores. That'd be proper therapy. Not some becky who is way in over her head as she has no idea what suffering is like, and in fact any high IQ incel knows more than her just by virtue of his experience.

SpecialGuestStar #pratt #dunning-kruger deviantart.com

Where is the science that justifies social distancing except in the spittle sector of your mouth and nose?

Where is the science that shows the probability of fomite (surface) transmission, when all we get is that it is possible if some virus gets on a surface, but they didn't evaluate infectivity of the virus found?

Where is the science that says people can't go outside where the virus does not live long in the sun but must be locked inside?

How are these the least intrusive restrictions on individual liberty to achieve the state's goal to slow the spread of the virus?

BummerDrummer #sexist #dunning-kruger incels.co

[RageFuel] How easy it would have been to stop female rights.

Female suffragists: "Give us rights! Voting rights! Equality!"


Done. That would have literally been it. Let me explain;

The difference between female equality movements and, say, negro civil rights movements is that Negroes posed an actual physical threat. Negro (males) could riot, get weapons, etc. If not a physical threat, many Negroes back in that time period had jobs (although usually bottom barrel tier) that if they mass protested in strikes could pose an economic problem. Women had neither physical power nor economic power. The only time women were ever really "militarized" and fought was around 10-15 years later in the Spanish Civil war, in which case they got utterly destroyed, and the reason these spanish civil war foids fought was because they were in a situation 1000x worse than 1920's woman's suffrage America.

Economically Women had no power either, a vast majority were either housewives or some easily replaceable job like a secretary. They did not have the economic sway to do anything if our fucking ancestors just said "No" to their plea for rights. "But m-muh they deserved it by working in the factories!" "In ww2 we would've lost cuz wymn made all the ammo!" No they didn't, this is a parroted talking point but if females didn't make any factory contributions at all in both world wars it would've ended the same way. They aren't "Muh independent wymn" for doing something even a child could do, which would be the people who would make ammo in factories if females didn't do it (Or other men not at the front).

There was no reason for our ancestors to have let these fucking stupid hags get anywhere in equality. They couldn't have done anything if we just said "No". But because of how cucked we were EVEN BACK THEN 100 YEARS AGO we said "Yes". Also cuz the jews.

CrossRufus #dunning-kruger #conspiracy #fundie #crackpot #pratt reddit.com

One thing I have been increasingly taking notice of is how e-skepticals - you know, the "science, reason, facts and logic" crowd, people you can easily find at internet communities such as "Fundies Say The Darndest Things", "RationalWiki" and basically most left-wing forums - tend to be extremelly vain, ego-driven and arrogantic. For instance, let's illustrate this with a hypothetical situation: imagine it's scientific consensus that a few million years ago there was a frozen continent named "Lumumba" and that a random man named Edmund contests the existence of Lumumba; according to the skepticals Edmund is a mentally unstable idiot whose brain lives in an alternative reality. At a first glance it could seem fair to regard him as such, he's in disagreement with thousands of individuals who are educated on that field after all, right? However, let's take into account that Edmund currently has no means to verify these claims by himself (like most people) and it basically has no relevance at all to his practical life; having that in mind, one should start to question if it really makes sense to mock and belittle that person. Why must he believe what a bunch of people with diplomas tell him on the matter in order to not be deemed as intelectually inferior? If having an inquisitive mindset is so valued and praised by the "facts and reason" crew then why people like Edmund are supposed to just accept everything scientists say? Why does that say anything about his mental health if believing or not believing in Lumumba causes literally zero negative impact in his life or in the lives of others? The whole issue here comes down to the fact that these skepticals aren't really interested in promoting scientific thinking and skepticism but rather in feeding their own ego and trying to affirme themselves as smart and enlightened in comparison to the "idiotic science-denying bigoted cranky fundies"; that's why you have youtube videos with titles such as "physicist reacts to flat-earthers" and websites such as the ones mentioned at the beggining (RationalWiki and FDST), it's all a huge group session of intellectual masturbation.

And no, I am not strawmaning, that hypothetical situation is based-off something quite similar I saw on a FDST thread: it was a comment that labeled anyone who took Pink Swastika (a book about alleged homosexuals in the Nazi Party and the connection between homossexuality and the fascist ideology) seriously was clinically insane. I mean, really? The view one has about things that happened more than seven decades ago in another continent is really so relevant to the point of determining their mental health? I can kind of understand cases like the mockery of flat-earthers (well, actually I don't, thinking that the Earth is flat causes no damage to anyone, so why not just let them have their belief instead of starting this whole outrage?), since it's actually possible to verify by yourself that the Earth cannot be flat (for example, by looking at the clouds in the sky or realizing that people in other countries are under different time-zones), but having this same attitude towards something so inexact, imprecise, malleable and distant such as the study of the past is an attestation of arrogance.

"You clearly don't understand how science works, the scientific method is extremely rigorous and scientists have to stand scrutiny from their peers in order to have their findings accepted as factual. If you have doubts about a certain topic you can simply study and verify it by yourself" Ok then, I will study it by myself and come to my own conclusions, but until I'm in my right to have doubts and having them instead of just blindly accepting everything the scientific community says (like, let's be honest, everyone does) doesn't make me intelectually inferior to anyone. However, let's not ignore that it would take me years and years of study to "understans" just one specific topic, that I would still have to just accept as true everything that my peers from the hundreds of other fields say (no, you can't seriously expect someone to specialize on everything in a lifetime, come on) and that even in my own field I would have to assume as true the countless premises that it's based upon (for example, an archeologist has to accept this or that method of dating as the most precise so everything he has learned so far can make sense - this example may not be accurate but I just wanted something to illustrate what I meant)

"Yikes, the Dunning-Kruger is strong on this one. Ok Mr. Nuanced Contrarian, so if all doctors said that taking poison is harmful for your well-being and may possibly culminate in your death but a local charlatan claimed it would give you superpowers then you would take both claims as having the same weight just because you can't verify it by yourself first?" No, I would absolutely stand with the doctors on that one; however, that's not because they are science-people but rather due the fact I know from my own experience that poison is harmful (by seeing all the cases of people who took it and experienced negative effects). So yes, I agree that it's stupid to do certain things when you can verify with YOUR OWN EYES that it won't have a good outcome (not vaccinating your kids, for example)

"We know that science is accurate because it works" Why? Where that implication comes from? Just because a certain institution or group of people creates things that work and improve our lives it doesn't necessarily mean their explanations and theories behind their "inventions" are true; if that is the case then the healers of some amazonian tribe are correct in their beliefs about spirits just because some of their cures are effective?

"If you are so against science then why don't you just drop your phone, leave everything behind and go live in the wilderness?" Again, why? Where that implication comes from? Just because I don't accept as true some explanations of reality that the scientific community come up with it doesn't mean that I think everything related to science is evil and that we should reject all of it's inventions

"You are thinking of scientists as 'the others' when in reality they are just people like you. Also, it would make no sense for scientists to try hiding something from the public when in fact they would receive prestige for exposing the findings of their peers as false" Well, what if they are indeed 'the others'? I mean, who knows? There could be a lobby to push for some agenda or a certain conspiracy to cover something up; this may sound like silly conspirationism but you can't really know for sure. As for the "scientists will seek to disprove their peers instead of covering them up" part, it's just an assumption, there is no reason to say that scientists will necessarily have such mindset; it can be true but it could also be true that anyone who questioned the consensus would risk getting ostracized or even losing their diploma and their source of income - I mean, who knows?

"Science may not have the answers for everything but that doesn't mean your cranky nutjob theories are on the same level of accuracy and respectability" Well, that's a "case by case" situation since there are many different "cranky nutjob theories" out there, but to spare some words and space let's say that such affirmation is mostly true. What then? Just because the alternative theories are wrong it doesn't mean all criticism is invalid. Furthermore, you have to have in mind that different worldviews often come from differing premises and assumptions; science, for instance, is based on methodological naturalism, the assumption the explanation for every topic investigated must be a natural/material/non-supernatural one, while a religious person, for example, takes into account the existence of the divine and thus will likely come up with an alternative and supernatural view of the same phenomenon (what you mockingly label as "goddidit"). Yes, these people have a faith they embrace and because of that they think differently, what's your problem with that? Why can't you just let them be? Oh, I forgot: you guys are desperate for self-affirmation and in constant need of feeling smart and enlightened in comparison to the "cranks, bigots and fundies", right?

UncleVladdi , Susan #racist #dunning-kruger 4racism.org

UncleVladdi: "Racism" (being truthful about our observations) might actually solve the problem of black laziness, impulsiveness, and promiscuity! Admitting a problem exists is the first step in solving that problem! Since melanin is not only a skin dye but also a neuro-transmitter, it will probably be easy to develop a simple beta-blocker to free blacks from their history of being unable to create stable societies or invent stuff!

Susan: Black laziness, impulsiveness, promiscuity are all characteristics of the inability to think logically or understand cause and effect. Nothing will ever change that because low IQ is the cause. IQ can't be raised. It's genetic.

UncleVladdi: IQ is only speed of thought and memory; it's' not 'smarts' or wisdom, which is how one uses it. Wisdom CAN be learned. Also, I'm pretty sure blacks have the requisite native intelligence, but it's suppressed by their melanin (which is not only a skin dye, but is also a neurotransmitter). Much like only they are genetically prone to sickle-cell anemia (which everyone admits is a problem) so is their endemic melanin-induced cognitive impairment (which is not admitted to, due to 'racism').

Andrew Anglin #racist #conspiracy #dunning-kruger dailystormer.name

[From "Jews Say That They’ll Continue Trying to Prosecute 100-Year-Old German Soldiers"]

As those who served in the German military during WWII have aged into their 90s, the Jews have stepped up their efforts to prosecute them. This is partially because the men are too old to defend themselves, and there is no evidence either way. It is also because the Jews want to keep the memory of the alleged “Holocaust” in the front of people’s brains as much as possible, so they can have an excuse for their ongoing abuse and exploitation of Christians and other non-Jews.

A “Nazi war crime” is now defined as “serving in the German military during World War II.”

SputnikNazi crimes have no statute of limitations and the advanced age of culprits cannot prevent their judicial prosecution, Christoph Heubner, executive vice president of the International Auschwitz Committee, said.


Arguably, the entire concept of “war crimes” is a hoax, given that when you are at war, you are following the laws of your own nation, not that of the nation that you’re fighting against, making it invalid for your enemies to prosecute you after you lose a war.

Basically, the entire theory of “war crimes” was developed following WWII to deal with the Nazis. The situation was very controversial, as many on the American side disagreed with the “denazification” process. The logical thing to do would have been to allow the Nazi government to remain intact after the war, with Hitler being forced to step down, and leaving a military occupation force there until such time as we were no longer worried about Germany starting another war.

The problem with this traditional solution to a post-war situation was that the German population couldn’t be allowed to continue to talk about the Jews, so they had to be brainwashed into believing the Jews were good and that Germans were evil for ever questioning their intentions.

The justification for the denazification process was provided by American Jew Henry Morgenthau, who claimed that the entire German nation was responsible for the war, and thus their entire society must be systematically destroyed. Although the Morgenthau Plan was eventually abandoned, the process of denazification was completed.

We are still living in the aftermath of WWII, and the regular prosecutions of Nazis are there to remind us of that.

Ken Ham #fundie #dunning-kruger friendlyatheist.patheos.com

Creationists Are Mocking Flat Earthers for Not Understanding Science
By Hemant Mehta, June 3, 2019

Talk about a complete lack of self-awareness: Creationist Ken Ham says people who think the Earth is flat are being ridiculous because they aren’t basing their beliefs in science. And if they think the Bible supports them, it’s only because they wrongly choose which verses to quote as if that tells the whole story.

Someone should introduce him to a mirror.

His hilarious rant was prompted by a new documentary in which one group of scientifically illiterate fools tells another group of scientifically illiterate fools why they’re scientifically illiterate fools.

Now, before you contact us to tell us the earth is flat, first, please watch this documentary. We’ve thoroughly researched the supposed biblical and scientific pieces of evidence presented in favor of such a (wrong) view. It simply isn’t taught in Scripture, and the science doesn’t support it (although, sadly, many Christians are being convinced by cherry-picked data that only shows part of the whole story and out of context).

If you know someone in the flat earth movement, I encourage you to share this documentary with them. And if you’re part of it, I respectfully encourage you to humbly view this film and reconsider your position.

Ham also says people now ask him if he believes in a Flat Earth “all the time!” He doesn’t seem to realize it’s because when you promote fiction as science, you’re bound to draw in an audience that’s susceptible to bad arguments and distorted facts.

BlkPillPres #dunning-kruger #sexist incels.co

[Blackpill] Response To: "You're Not Entitled To Sex"

1. Nobody is entitled to anything

Entitlements are a figment of imagination, they exist only in the minds of humans, and function only within societies where they are allowed to function, and are facilitated (usually through tax collection to fund said "entitlement programmes")

Pension, welfare, clean water, education, nobody is really entitled to any of it if were being objective and honest.

2. Incels don't feel entitled to sex, they simply WANT sex

I keep seeing the "entitlement" argument repeated everywhere and it is literally just a strawman argument, propping up a stance so absurd that you can't help but be right being against it, heck even I agree with being against it, because its egotistical and illogical for anyone to think they literally DESERVE anything, a normies reasoning for being against it would likely be more emotionally based though, more like - "women are people too, this is so misogynistic, its so hurtful, etc, etc".

Are there a few incels actually going around saying and believing that they "deserve" sex and are entitled to it, yes, but those men are idiots, they are outliers, any logical person knows full well nobody "deserves" anything. Most incels adhere to the "black pill philosophy", and a key "tenant" of that is basing ones life choices and interpretation of observations, on cold hard logic, so I doubt most incels (or even 5% of incels) actually believe they DESERVE sex

Incels simply just want, just like every other human on this planet that wants, to try and paint incels as this collective of egotistical males, that all think they are entitled to sex (women's bodies) is a falsehood that is often peddled by the media and society at large.

You see because its much easier to simply create a false narrative that can be argued against, than to argue against the actual thing. Paint incels as malicious and egotistical instead of frustrated and suicidal, and its much easier to demonize incels and garner support against them.

3. Disenfranchised Males = Self Destructive Males

There's this african proverb that I think perfectly describes whats taking place between modern society and average/below average males.

"If the young are not initiated in the tribe, they will burn down the village just to feel its warmth."

Modern society is extremely sexualized, there is no escape from sex as a man in these times, which is why it feels like you're being trolled whenever people say the all too cliche phrase "sex isn't the most important thing in life", nice strawman argument, now simply wanting sex because its being shoved down your throat at every waking moment, is equal to thinking its the most important thing in the world. Statements like that are nothing but dismissive shaming and silencing tactics.

Sex is in the news papers, magazines, tv, movies, video games, its in advertisements, bill boards, the internet, etc. People need to try and understand how "dystopian" of a reality this would all seem to a man who is unable to acquire sex due to unrealistic and unfair female standards that only exist due to various societal changes that resulted from feminism. Its like a sick joke were forced to live through. Everyone is telling us to just "get over it" while ironically enjoying sex lives themselves and boasting/talking about it at every waking moment.

Imagine if you woke up and basically everyone on the planet had an expensive sports car, all you see are people around you driving it, everyone with a sports car gets treated differently than those who don't, they have higher social status, etc. For some reason you can't get one no matter how much you adhere to the advice suggested by sports car owners. Everytime you complain about the biased system that keeps you from getting one, someone tells you - "there are more important things in life than sports cars", they then later proceed to talk with their friends about all the awesome sports cars they drove, post about the current sports car they have leased, and make instagram and other media posts about how great their sports car driving life is and how great they are at driving sports cars.

Quite obviously these people are being disingenuous, they know your complaints are legitimate, they don't actually follow their own words and they glorify sports cars and ownership of it ad nauseum, really they just want people without sports cars to STFU and deal with it, live without having a sports car and stop ruining the experience for the rest of them. Its really fucked up but that is societys mindset towards men who can't get sex, they know that argument is BS, they know they are lying and sex is of the utmost importance to every human (its not the most important thing, but its really really up there on the list, some might argue 2nd or 3rd place). They only repeat this BS because its really just about shaming and silencing men for daring to make society even feel a tad bit guilty or responsible for our current state of being disenfranchised. They really just expect incels to "STFU and take one for the team".

Sex is clearly a vital part of every humans existence, a man doesn't even "become a man" in a sense within society until he has sex, in essence a lot of men have not undergone their "right of passage" to become part of the "tribe" that is modern human civilization.

This is why all of these mass shootings are taking place, its started to branch off into other things like the "Thot Audit", more and more things like this are going to keep happening until society finally acknowledges this problem and begins to make changes.

So as it stands we now have a significant and growing pool of sexually starved men, who due to this are angry, violent, irritable and suicidal, seriously how does society expect this to play out, the most dangerous animal is the one backed into a corner with nothing to lose, when someone doesn't care if they die, worse yet they want to die just so their sad existence can end, there is no reasoning with that person, they are on a "war path", you either kill them, give that person what they want, or you get out of their way as they proceed to claim what they want.

Society expects us not to burn the village down when it won't initiate us into the tribe, that's whats truly outrageous, not the violence of disenfranchised men, but the fact that society actually expects us to just remain docile and accept this reality that has been forced upon us.

4. Women aren't entitled to safety

People don't seem to understand the danger of looking the collective male populace in they eyes, and telling them they aren't entitled to something that not too long ago they would just taking by force as a norm.

Men reformed themselves and created societies with laws and codes of conduct because it benefited the collective, especially the collective male populace, this was the function of "patriarchal societies". To manage a safe and fair distribution of resources, and that includes sexual and reproductive resources.

Virginity was a prerequisite for a woman to be "marriage material" because men wanted to be sure that when they married a woman she would be less likely to cheat, as she'd be more likely to be satisfied sexually with her partner due to lack of "sexual experience". It also ensured that your investment would be worth it as you aren't footing the bill for "used goods", that may sound cruel but men have to basically invest a lot into a woman's very being, even more so today, get divorced once and half of your wealth goes to another person, and these days the women aren't even virgins, marriage is truly a raw deal in this modern era.

Marriage as an institution existed for various reasons, it was used to create familial ties, for political reasons, etc, but most importantly to give a sense of assurance to men that the children their wives gave birth do were indeed theirs (hence virginity being the key defining trait of "marriage material"), and they could pass down their name and wealth to their children.

For the same reason Female Promiscuity was shamed and led to social ostracization. Womens hypergamy had to be kept in check otherwise the relationship dynamics between men and women would fall apart and so would the "family unit" which is basically the "building block" of society.

Crimes like Rape were especially frowned upon because it made a woman unfit for marriage and ruined her entire life, it also went against the civility agreement between men who as a collective all wanted their respective women in their lives to be safe and remain "their women" and not be "tarnished" by another man.

I hope people get the point here, the purpose of these laws and societal norms were to ensure a code of conduct amongst men, so that we would as a collective agree to allow each other to pursue and court women in a safe and organized manner, unimpeded by other men in an "unfair" manner, we all had a fair chance. There was a "social contract" at play here.

In these modern times the social contract is no longer functioning, expecting men not to regress and go back to the days of rape and violence when the contract is no longer being enforced and/or adhered to, is what is truly outrageous, and not the acts themselves. Men aren't entitled to sex?, true I agree, but women aren't entitled to safety either, they never were entitled to it and they never will be, it was a "provision" offered by men to women for co-operating with men to facilitate the social contract. The safety resided within the rule set of the social contract, which is no longer at play here, so a significant and increasing number of males are seeing no reason to function as "civil" men, there's no logical reason too, why be civil when you essentially are not even part of civilization, civility its no longer to our benefit. Women's actions have thrown the entire system out of order, and the violent responses of men today are retaliatory. Society is basically trying to make average/below average males into somewhat of a "slave class" that offers their labor and utility, contributes to society, all while being barred from enjoying a basic pleasure that all the female citizens get to enjoy despite contributing less and having to risk their lives less.

Ask yourself who are really the crazy ones, the men who go out committing acts of violence or "opt out" of society, or the society that expected these men not to do this, despite significantly ruining the quality of life for the collective male populace, and having the gall to ask them to keep up their end of the social contract and be "good little boys and contribute to society as upstanding citizens" :feelskek:. Are you fucking serious, no wonder men are opting out of society, no wonder men are going out on murder rampages.


There's no real motivation to bother trying, to be a "hard worker", to be "civilized", when your reward at the end of the day is to get married to used goods who is likely only settling for you because she's aged past her prime and has a ton of baggage, to top it off with no fault divorce laws she can easily just leave with half of your wealth, and modern society actually celebrates and endorses female promiscuity and cheating on men, so that great investment you made isn't even guaranteed to be solely yours to enjoy JFL. Men have literally no motivation to be "good people", anyone who thinks people should be "good" for the sake of "being good" is an illogical idiot that doesn't get how reality actually works.

In the bible there's heaven and hell, in human laws there are cash rewards for helping law enforcement with certain tasks, and there are fines and jail time for committing crimes or breaking minor laws.

GOOD AND EVIL CAN ONLY BE TRULY (OBJECTIVELY) DEFINED BY THE FACT THAT THERE ARE REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS ASSOCIATED RESPECTIVELY, that is how we truly distinguish a good act from a bad one, if we rely on subjective opinion based criteria then anyone and everyone is both right and wrong, good and bad, based on their own personal reasonings and whims. If the bible said that no matter what you do everyone goes to heaven, but "please still don't sin" nobody would give a fuck about the rules, most every Christian would be sinning without any restraint or repentance, rules mean nothing without a reward and punishment system in place.

To address another cliche statement - "where have all the good men gone", I ask "by what objective criteria are you ascribing the label "good" ". Reinstate a sufficient "rewards system" for males and you'll see all those men come running back.

Incels Wiki #sexist #conspiracy #dunning-kruger incels.wiki

In women's own words, sexual harassment is what occurs when an unattractive man makes a flirtatious advance on a woman who does not find him attractive. The problem with this conceptualization of the issue is that legally speaking you cannot have different sets of rules for ugly men and attractive men. If it is okay for Chad to say "Hey Linda, love that dress, it fits you so nice!" but it is sexual harassment for an ugly guy to say it, you have created a human rights violation. Laws and regulations must apply to ACTIONS, not FEELINGS, because no one can objectively regulate feelings or apply fair rules to everyone based on feelings.[1]

In an incredibly naive act, feminism has torn down gender segregation at work, leading to increased time men and women spend together, increasing the potential for sexual tensions, misunderstandings, unwanted sexual advances etc. As a result, workplace sexual harassment has become an issue of increasing urgency and as a result of that in turn, harassment laws have been sharpened and women are essentially trying to turn the world into their living room. With widened definition of rape, also the definition of harassment has widened over time. For example, the percentage of women who perceive cat calling or staring as harassment has dramatically increased in the past decades.[2] As a result, an increasing percentage of men refuse to cooperate with women at workplace, and avoid being alone with them in one room.[3]

Hilariously, women themselves admit, that whether something counts as harassment depends on the physical attractiveness of the harasser.[4] There is evidence that moderate lifetime adversity has a steeling effect, i.e. individuals who have faced some difficulties in their lives are on average in better psychological shape than others.[5] This brings into question whether harassment is harmful at all provided that it neither causes physical harm, nor long-term deprivation of basic needs (which would count as severe adversity).

Contrary to feminist claims that male misogyny is the main cause of sexual harassment, a study in 2017 found that a measure of sociosexual orientation (level of mating effort and openness toward casual sex) predicted sexual harassment, not "rape myth acceptance" or misogyny, this also implies that claims of sexual harassment are often simply an offended women's reaction to a unsolicited offer to engage in casual sex by a man she finds undesirable, as stated by the authors of the paper: "when the solicitation comes from a desirable perpetrator the same type of behavior might not even be experienced as harassment".[6]

BrazilianSigmasDad #sexist #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Based] Reminder: If you want to destroy civilization just give women rights

Women have contributed NOTHING of value to any society across the world. Pretty much every invention was made by men. Almost every road you drive on and building you go in was constructed by men. Men vastly outnumber women in STEM, why? Because women are too fucking dumb for that :feelskek: All foids know what to do is post bikini pics on instagram, watch netflix, text chad. and make fun of short , ugly, or ethnic men. Foids do not think at all. Men have a desire to better the world, foids have a desire to better only themselves. Everything must be about them. They dress like fucking whores and sluts (for attention), cry sexual harassment when approached by an ugly male ( for attention), and then go onto to be fake depressed when they don't get their way (for attention). The only value women have are those between the ages of 18-25 with the ability to reproduce. After the age of 25 when roasties hit the wall they look like shit. Their roast beef flaps start hanging out and they start smelling like tuna, not to mention thats when pretty much all women start becoming landwhales. Women know they are useless. They do not push society forward, they push it backwards. Giving women rights is what destroyed the west, now as the rest of the world adopts western feminism, welp, its game over for humanity. Society is about to enter a new dark age thanks to women

Thomas Paine II #crackpot #dunning-kruger #conspiracy renegadetribune.com

Consider this…If you look at the ancient greek and latin alphabets, you wont find the letter “J” so there is no way names using the letter “J” today can be traced back to ancient times. Furthermore, If you look at old and middle english, there is no letter “J” there either, so there is no way names using the letter “J” today can be traced back to the earliest beginnings of the english language. You don’t find the letter “J” until modern english was invented in the 14th century. This coincides with the Renaissance era, and the invention of the gutenberg press, even though no one knew how to read. This is also the King James’ era, and the invention of and mass printing of his bible, where he comes up with the self-serving idea that his invented god gave kings divine rights. Imagine that. These religious systems are dark age psyops weapons meant to control populations and justify the never ending group slaughters we call war. They atomize populations into individuals preventing collective consciousness and collective power, they misdirect the life focus toward an impossile afterlife, they create the belief in nonexistant ghosts, spirits, demons and other such nonsense, they utterly destroy logically thinking, science and evidence-based worldviews, it makes jews the choosen ones (surprise, surprise) it opens uneducated minds into easy manipulations, and worst of all, religion hides the warfare processes that humanity is trapped in, and must conquer to survive, thus disarming us in a false reality. And thats just for starters. Religions are the dirtest trick ever played on humanity.

M Walter #pratt #fundie #dunning-kruger christianforums.com

I hate to be a jerk, but I really don't understand how anyone can accepts the tenets of evolution. It is irrational at best: lacks cause-and-effect, doesn't agree with basic thermodynamics, doesn't work mathematically, is contrary to the laws of probability, lacks empirical data, to name a few things, and besides it is really quite silly. What exactly do you get outta it...I mean the personal relationship?? There must be a great disparity in your life as your belief-system disagrees with reality so much.

theson #sexist #psycho #dunning-kruger incels.co

[Based] High IQ idea: quantizing pussy

Users who quantize pussy by using terminology such as "a crumb of pussy", "an ounce of pussy", "tons of pussy" are high IQ. Toilets are pretending like sex is not a resource they have a monopoly over that can be redistributed, but rather some abstract spiritual thing that is bestowed by the gods upon the worthy. The traditional view of sex is similar to the divine right of kings to rule, where women's command of the pussy resource cannot be brought into question. Quantizing pussy and discussing dating in terms of markets desmystifies and democratizes sex which can be a catalyst for social change. Reddit toilets get mad when you quantize pussy, that's how you know this is a legit tactic.

Donald Trump #conspiracy #wingnut #dunning-kruger static.independent.co.uk

When will all the “reporters” who have received Noble Prizes for their work on Russia, Russia, Russia, only to have been proven totally wrong (and, in fact, it was the other side who committed the crimes), be turning back their cherished “Nobles” so they can be given to the REAL REPORTERS & JOURNALISTS who got it right. I can give the Committee a very comprehensive list. When will the Noble Committee DEMAND the prizes back, especially since they were gotten under fraud? The reporters and Lamestream Media knew the truth all along. Lawsuits should be brought against all, especially the Fake News Organizations, to rectify this terrible injustice. For all the great lawyers out there, do we have any takers? When will the Noble Committee act? Better be fast!

Save The Children! #conspiracy #fundie #wingnut #racist #psycho #dunning-kruger exposingpedovore.wordpress.com

Adrenochrome is generally known to be harvested from the Pineal Glands of penguins in places such as Antarctica (the South Pole, an order of such is described in this WikiLeaks cable); however, this obviously does not meet the global luciferian elite’s needs for getting intoxicated and drunk on their conquests. Therefore, tying into pedogate (which was recently rolled up and uncovered by the United States DOJ), the luciferian elite instead kidnap children, rape, and torture them in order to concentrate the adrenaline/epinephrine in their glands, then harvest the adrenochrome from the glands while the subject is living (the Adrenochrome
does not last long in a post mortem) they sacrifice the child after the drug is extracted. Alternately, the subject may be kept alive for repeated extractions; (they keep the children captive as a prisoner, hidden somewhere, for a “long term traumatization treatment”, where they maintain the child alive, but they traumatize, torture, rape, and extract the blood of the child with blood transfusions multiple times, until the child finally dies from the abuse and blood loss or they decide to kill the child in one of their many (monthly) satanic child sacrifice rituals.
This constant need for living subjects, to harvest the chemical out of their adrenal glands, is why the zionists doesn’t want peace in Israel.

The status quo of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has made Palestinians into de facto and de jure second class citizens, who can be legally harvested at any time by any Israeli citizen for organs, tissue, and precious Adrenochrome. They also run massive child trafficking rings all over the world, which buy and sell children (Adrenochrome more readily concentrates in a child’s glands, since the glands do not grow much with age, and since children experience massively heightened “fight or flight” reactions and increased adrenaline surges as a result of trauma). According to the FBI there are averaging 460,000+ missing children in America every single year, however the true number may be significantly higher since it has recently been revealed that the FBI is nothing more than a corrupt front organization covering crimes for the luciferian elites in America. Scientists have speculated that long term exposure to Adrenochrome may cause schizophrenia; this may in part be why Zionists are over 30x more likely than the general population to suffer from the mental disorder.

Arc_Unreal #fundie #conspiracy #dunning-kruger twitter.com

Answer to “Sodium has two electronic transitions at 590 and 590,5 nm, the sodium doublet. Sodium lasers are tuned to that wavelength. Sodium atoms absorb photons and later emit them. These flashes work as guide stars for the wavefront sensors”.

That is nothing but deceptive lying nonsense.

It is as ridiculous as their belief that large bodies of water clings to the outside of spherical, spinning balls.


Sans #sexist #dunning-kruger incels.co

“Sex is a privilege, not a right!”

Every cuckold, soyboy and roastie in existence loves to parrot the phrase that “sex is a privilege, not a right!!11”. However, If it’s a privilege, then aren’t sex havers privileged? And therefore we are oppressed by them, just like how men supposedly oppress women because of male privilege, same with white privilege etc?

If it’s a privilege, then why is it okay for some people to have and some don’t?

Nero Augustus #wingnut #dunning-kruger #psycho identitydixie.com

[From "What Makes a Man?"]

Slaves and Citizens
Wow, look at you. Mommy’s big boy, all grown up. You can do anything, now that you’re an adult. You can eat all the cake, drink all the craft beer, and watch all the porn into the wee hours of the morning because nobody can limit your consumption now that you’ve shed the trappings of childhood and become a man. Or, have you?

Take a step back and look at who you have become. Today, the average American male is a pale specter of manliness that was present just a few generations prior. Grip strength tested today is down 20% over a span of 30 years. We spend more time indoors and are sedentary, our short-term memory is basically non-existent and we’re sicker than ever. Compare yourself to men of the past and ask if you really deserve the same title as them.

Comparing the Greek words Aner vs Anthropos reveals us how a distinction that once existed between men and the rest. Real men have been, and will always be, rare – while all others will just be shadow figures. While both terms described human males, aner went farther, to distinguish said men as those who were more than just the base. Consumers, and modern NPCs, all fit the definition of anthropos. They do not rise in any discernible way past the flesh heap of common man. Therefore, they do not deserve any higher title than that. Why then would there be no further distinctions between the two?

Slave Societies and the Military State
The great slave societies of the past included, but were not limited to, the Greek city states, the Roman Empire, and the antebellum South. Each of these civilizations maintained large slave populations that constituted significant portions of their labor force. Sparta stands out as one of the most stark examples of a slave society in that slaves, or helots, constituted around 80% of Sparta’s population. The slave population, at its peak, in Dixie constituted around 33%, despite being a mere 13% of the total U.S. population. Being that Sparta, and to a lesser extent other slave societies, contained so many slaves, there were constant and realistic fears of slave uprisings that could threaten the lives and business interests of the rest of the population. It is no coincidence that each of the great slave societies maintained strong military traditions and standing forces at the ready to check against uprisings.


The South, like other great slave societies, was not just a militaristic one, but the sort of society that simultaneously fosters a culture in which social refinement blooms. Southern poets, authors, artists and statesmen were, more often than not, the leading talents in their fields, even after the end of the War. Southern military schools did, and have continued, to produce leaders in many fields disproportionate to their competitor schools. The Southern military tradition even continues today with over 50% of the combat forces of the United States being produced by the Southern states, wholly disproportionate with the country’s population.


As in the novel Starship Troopers, you could not vote or become a citizen if you did not complete your military service requirements. The end product of this agoge and military service allowed the numerically disadvantaged Spartans to reign over their more numerous helots with an iron fist, while simultaneously warding off enemy nations. Compared to the heroic Greek soldiers of other city states, the Spartans were, for the most part, the professional elites. Not only this, Sparta was also home to some of the most iconic artists and architects of the time, something that similarly occurs in other great slave societies. The agoge was such a revered system that nobles, from all around the Greek world, would fight for a chance to send their child through the same system.

All this and more was required just for Spartans to attain the rights and privileges that you, as that special grown-up boy that you are, think you are entitled to. What though have you done to earn said rights? While you may believe that the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are inalienable, and God given, can you really believe that all men are equal? Can two individuals of different size, or even importance, be entitled to the same share of finite resources within their country? Why should a self-diagnosed depressive, bipolar lgbtqaipsuv demikin have the same rights and privileges as someone who contributes to society? Why should the average person even have the right to vote?

I’ve written before about chattel slavery and how the absence of self-mastery would result in your enslavement. How then, can people who fail to master themselves, have responsibility to weild a tool to oppress others?

The byproduct of the great slave societies’ need for military tradition bore out the pleasant side effect that those who bore through the rigors of said systems were rarely below average and often outpaced their contemporaries.

michael louwen #fundie #dunning-kruger christiannews.net

You are actually agreeing with me that the 1964 Civil Rights Act does not apply to or protect the gays/LGBTQs from discrimination in public accommodations.

The 1776 US Constitution enacted the "separation of Church and State" policy, not the separation of Mosque/Temple and State.

The 1776 US Constitution also prohibited the powerful US government from restricting her citizens' rights to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom to protest peacefully to seek redress and freedom to bear arms. In theory, this protection applied to Christian and non-Christian citizens. But in 1776, nearly all US citizens were Whites and/or Christians = about 99%, ie no Moslems or Hindoos.

In the early 1800s, Blacks were brought into USA as slaves, mostly to work in the cotton fields in the South. In 1861, the mostly Christian White citizens killed each other over slavery and politics and were henceforth split into Northern White liberals and Southern White conservatives = became perennial enemies. And 1 century later, US citizens would include sizable numbers of Moslems and Hindoos who were mostly immigrated into USA by the vote-pandering White liberals of the Blue States in the North and West.

Missing Universe Museum #fundie #dunning-kruger web.archive.org

Per Evolutionists a vestigial organ or appendage is supposedly something that exists in a living organism without any function, but served some useful purpose in the past in some ancestral form. These should exist as well as harmless appendages that never did perform any useful function. They would be external as well as internal.

Here is an illustration of a created man as opposed to one who just evolved by chance:
Note that the Evolution man is bloated due to the numerous useless internal vestigial organs. Evolution would be obvious and undeniable if we looked like the man on the right! He would have trouble finding a suit that fits!

If Evolution is truly occurring, vestigial organs would not only exist, but they would greatly outnumber the fully functional ones! The same argument applies for transitional forms as described in Exhibit 5. Since Evolution is a random, chance process, there must be numerous trial and error combinations until a functional organ or appendage is produced. Any of these "vestigial" organs would still be in existence in a multitude of species and individuals and there would be no doubt that Evolution is fact.

However, in the late 1800's there were an estimated 150 vestigial parts in the human body. Supposedly anyone can claim that something is vestigial because it serves no apparent purpose and the individual can survive without it. Today there are no vestigial organs claimed for the human body! That is because in the last 100 years, medical science has found that there is indeed a purpose to everything in the human body.

Creation says there will be zero vestigial organs while Evolution requires millions of them.

imageThis car engine also has no vestigial parts because, like the human body, it too had a Creator! If something so complex as the human body could evolve by chance, then even more so could this automobile evolve by chance.

I don't know what many of the car parts do, but that doesn't mean they are useless leftovers (vestigial).

imageJust look at how the human body is ingeniously packaged. Like the car engine above, everything in the human body has a purpose and was designed by a Creator.

imageFirst we remove the external vestigial organs so we can make an incision.
After the incision we must remove the internal vestigial organs that are in our way.
Then we can perform the heart surgery.

Why don't we ever hear doctors mention vestigial organs?

imageVestigial Organ Donor Card - why don't we see these?

imageWe're having Vestigial Stew today.
Tomorrow it will be left over left overs!

Skimmingway #wingnut #dunning-kruger wehuntedthemammoth.com

I am only a monarchist to the extent that I am not an anarcho-capitalist, or rather, that I think that the world may not yet be ready for my preferred form of governance.

Monarchism has the superior quality, in that it retains the concept of private property, but it centralizes it within the hands of one individual, who has vested interest in maintaining the health and wealth of the entire kingdom, for he owns it in its entirety. Democracy is plagued by short time preferences, in that politicians often sacrifice the long term for the short term in order to gain reelection; by contrast, a monarch must maintain his kingdom long enough to pass it down to his offspring, and in so doing, he is most unaffected by whatever passing intellectual fad or ephemeral complaint rises from the mouths of his subjects. Having been schooled in political theory and having been given the best sort of education that money and influence can afford one of his stature, he is in possession of a set of highly cultivated talents that bestow a degree of legitimacy on his decisions that no other person can lay claim to.

JonFreeman #wingnut #dunning-kruger #pratt deviantart.com

Science is not an exact science.

If you look at the embarrassingly troubled history of climate change you'll find that the path from 60s to now (global cooling, global warming, climate change, climate chaos, global warming again) all have the same answer: ban evil oil.

Once you realize this, it becomes clear the whole this is a justification. Aka "hypothesis over findings" or "truth over facts" as Biden would say.

Really it's weaponized statistics.

But with the pretense of "science" people use it the same way puritan zealots religiously pushed their baseless fears into actionable destruction.

... like how anyone who dares question the stats of the pandemic is a heretic who must be silenced.

coelophysis #crackpot #conspiracy #dunning-kruger markwitton-com.blogspot.com

its no mystery people know the truth ok some of them they know those dinosaur are birds the won badit scientist try to pass off as dinosaurs look at spinosauridae and know its a reptile probly link with crocodilian and it is .and protofeathers are collogen fiber and no coelophysis type of dinosaurs every found with feathers those fake dinosaurs the dinobird all have long arms a bird flight feature big bird brain teeth replacement is different from real dinosaurs and microraptor was a true bird with flight feathers and flight sternum. oviraptor was found with a pygostyle. therizinosaur group inner ears is of a bird the wrist is moon shape like modern birds that help them fly better with good wrist movement dinosaurs have bad wrist movement the best was 18 degree a turkey 59 degree microraptor 60 degree eoconfuciusornis zhengi 55 degree 2 therizinosaur 26 degree 39 degree sinornithosaurus 35 degree oviraptor close reltive 76 degree. velociraptor qull nob is been debated another scientist fine different finding I doubt that was qull nob only strong flyer have qull nob velociraptor was a flightless bird it was too big. all dinosaurs were armo on there backs they could not climb trees to lose the armo like iguana monitor lizard basilisk chameleon they have no croc bums tuatara not a tree climber look like a croc.tuatara can take cold and dinosaurs closes reltive is the turtle .reason they not buying feather dinosaurs all bird link turn out not to be true fast growing by the bone tissue evidence it was false bird mother bone in t.rex false and they know about protoavis and they not getting all imformation from badit scientist they keep lefting out some of the detail. jack horner said steven has the last call on feather dinosaur on j4 and bird are knee runner they have fix femur the thigh bone they do not run like dinosaurs they have special bird knee on top of giant ankle .dinosaurs have crocodilian knee with very small ankle.dinosaur is a prehistoric crocodilian just a prehistoric alligator so all the movies were wrong

fschmidt #dunning-kruger #elitist undepraved.mikraite.org

In primitive societies, sick people go to a witch doctor who jumps up and down. Then when the person recovers (as usually happens) the witch doctor takes credit and so the respect and admiration for witch doctors is sustained among the moronic population.

Essentially the same process is now happening with the coronavirus at a national level. The national witch doctors advise the leaders to impose senseless restrictions on the population. Then when the coronavirus naturally passes, the witch doctors give credit to the senseless restrictions.

The one exception to this is China. I suspect that the original coronavirus was virulent and mutated fairly rapidly. The Chinese response was to focus quarantine on those with symptoms. This meant that those with the coronavirus but without symptoms were allowed to spread the less virulent variations of the coronavirus. By doing this, China bred the coronavirus to be about as virulent as the flu. So China effectively solved the problem of the virus, but not the problem of the collective insanity of modern culture.

Most numbers thrown around are meaningless because there is no accounting of people who had the coronavirus but had no symptoms. The only country that I know of that has real numbers is Iceland which reports a 0.3% death rate which is in the range of the flu. So the coronavirus should basically be thought of as a bad flu. Like any new virus, it starts with exponential growth in a new population but then levels off as herd immunity is reached. Extrapolating from the numbers during the initial exponential phase makes no sense.

I view the coronavirus as a gift from God, essentially God giving depraved modern culture the rope to hang itself. The collective insanity of modern culture should finally cause the long overdue financial collapse that modern culture deserves. And that is a very good thing because it will reduce the attractiveness of modern culture and allow alternatives to grow.

Dr. Anatoly T Fomenko et al #conspiracy #crackpot #dunning-kruger evilempire.blog

Thorough research shows that there is literally no reliably datable information about events before the VIII century and that there is only very scarce information originating from the VIII to the X century. As a matter of fact, most events of “Ancient” History took place from the XI to the XVI century, were replicated on paper in 1400-1600 AD, and positioned under different labels in an imaginary past.

Our theory simply returns the consensual chronology of World History to the realm of applied mathematics from which it was sequestrated by the clergy in the XVI-XVII centuries. New Chronology is a valid and verifiable method for historical research based on statistics, astronomy, and logic.

Computer-assisted recalculation of eclipses with detailed descriptions allegedly belonging to Antiquity shows that they either occurred in the Middle Ages or didn’t occur at all. A simple application of computational astronomy to the rules of calculation of Easter according to the Easter Book introduced by the Nicean Council of alleged 325 AD shows that it definitely could not have taken place before 784 AD.

We have cross-checked archaeological, astronomical, dendrochronological, paleographical and radiocarbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts. We found them ALL to be non-independent, non-exact, statistically implausible, contradictory and inevitably viciously circular because being based or calibrated on the same consensual chronology.

Some related questions may arise: when and where was Jesus Christ born, when was He crucified? Was The Old Testament compiled before or after the New One, etc..? No, the New Chronology theory does not cancel events, artefacts, Pyramids, Great Walls, etc, but points to their more probable positions on the time axis.

The consensual chronology we live with was essentially crafted in the XVI century from the contradictory mix of innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts (all originals have mysteriously disappeared) and the “proofs” delivered by the late medieval astronomers, cemented by the authority of writings of the Church Fathers.

“History: Fiction or Science?” series leads you to step by step to the inevitable conclusion that the classical chronology is wrong and therefore, that the classical history of the ancient and medieval world, was created to order by the concerted effort of the clergy and humanists each in their vested interests.

There is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century. Classical history is firmly based on copies of the primary sources made in the XV-XVII centuries from the ‘unfortunately lost’ originals.

Learn how and why the history of Ancient Rome and Greece, Egypt, and Persia were invented and paraphernalia crafted during the Renaissance. Discover the Old Testament as a veiled rendition of events of Middle Ages written centuries after the New Testament. Perceive the Crusaders as contemporaries of The Crucifixion punishing the tormentors of the Messiah. What if Jesus Christ was born in 1152 and crucified in 1185 AD?

The trouble with Dr Fomenko and Dr Nosovskiy is that they have reached out too far and struck the dominating historical discourse too heavy a blow.

Roger Marks #fundie #dunning-kruger disqus.com

(commenting on story “Freedom From Religion Foundation Lodges Complaint Against Teacher for ‘Undermining Theory of Evolution’”):

I can't believe that intelligent human beings can believe the fairy stories raised by FFRF.

Lets list them....

1. The teacher undermined the teaching of evolution. FACT. There is nothing to undermine as it lacks substance.

2. A concerned parent. So one person's knowledge supersedes the knowledge of over 1,000 scientists.

3. He explained that none have been “able to find when something becomes something else” and that evolution is contrary to genetics, such as if a dog “underwent several mutations and became a cat.” So the teacher has to teach lies to satisfy one parent.

4. “So, what that means is that you have to play the evolutionary game because the people writing this are married to that idea, despite the new proofs and the science coming out,” he is quoted as saying about the exam. So the school demands that teachers teach lies.

5. Evolution, like gravity, is a scientific fact. … No controversy exists in the scientific community regarding the fact of evolution, Another lie that the school has swallowed hook line and sinker.

6. “Teaching creationism or any of its offshoots, such as intelligent design, in a public school is unlawful because creationism is not based on fact.” And evolution is based on fantasy but never mind if students do not learn the facts.

7. “Mr. Lucason must be directed to refrain from promoting religion or attacking evolution to his students,” it opined. “If he cannot do this, he cannot be a teacher in a public school.” But the school is bowing to the dictates of a religion of no religion.

8. The parent who complained to FFRF — who has remained anonymous — similarly claimed to the Utica Observer-Dispatch,“A biology teacher telling students that evolution can cause only minor changes within a species and cannot cause one species to gradually become a different species over the course of thousands of years is the equivalent of a math teacher telling students that it’s possible to add two plus three, but it’s impossible to multiply 987 by 6,789.” Evolution is pure supposition with no factual evidence. Maths is factual with plenty of evidence.

9. “We have consulted with our legal counsel to confirm a clear understanding of the constitutional requirements referred to in your letter regarding instruction on evolution,” he wrote. There is nothing in the Constitution about teaching evolution.

Seems that the school is run by a group of blockheads that do not have single spine amongst them, letting one parent dictate curriculum.

Janusz Korwin-Mikke #racist #conspiracy #dunning-kruger jta.org

(JTA) — A far-right lawmaker in Poland said that natural selection in pogroms have made Jews powerful, and that “there are theories” that rabbis provoked violence to achieve this.

Janusz Korwin-Mikke made the comment in an interview for the Polsat channel last week about the coronavirus, the Do Rzeczy newspaper reported Wednesday.

“Jews are now powerful because they had pogroms,” he said. “As a result of pogroms, the strongest and the most gifted survived. This is a warning to anti-Semites: That is why Jews are powerful, because they had pogroms. There are even theories that rabbis deliberately provoke pogroms precisely so that Jews survive and then there is natural selection.”

Korwin-Mikke, a former lawmaker in the European Parliament and a leader of the Confederation Liberty and Independence party, has a history of making anti-Semitic statements and stunts.

Last year, he slipped a kippah on the head of a state secretary while she was speaking at a televised debate that Korwin-Mikke also attended.

Also in 2019, he aired a conspiracy theory about Jews while commenting on reports in the Israeli media on a custom in which residents of the town of Pruchnik beat with sticks an effigy of an Orthodox Jew representing Judas Iscariot, the betrayer of Jesus.

darreact #wingnut #dunning-kruger #elitist darwinianreactionary.wordpress.com

am going to try to write a few shorter posts over the next couple of weeks instead of my usual long, multi-part epics. Today’s subject is traditionalism. The point of this post is merely tactical, a way to get around the negative connotations of the word “tradition.” As soon as someone says they are a traditionalist they open themselves up to some immediate objections. You can already hear howls that slavery was a tradition, or invocations of Shirley Jackson’s The Lottery. Either that or you will invoke images of silly harmless holidays like Groundhog’s Day. This is because the word “tradition” has a connotation of rote repetition for no other reason than that is how things have always been done.

However, this is not what a self-described traditionalist is trying to convey. When someone claims they are a traditionalist they are making the point that things have been done a certain way for good reasons, and that there isn’t really a better word for this in English than “tradition.” What is missing from the word “tradition” is the crucial point that traditions are teleofunctional. Take Chesterton’s fence. Chesterton’s point is that the fence serves a purpose; it has a function (to keep the horses in or whatever). A fence is a designed artifact with a function, and in claiming that tradition is like a fence the analogy is that traditions are designed to prevent problems, that traditions are teleofunctional.

Just because something has a function of course doesn’t mean it was good. Slavery had a function, providing the slave owners with a life of comfort. It is a separate argument to show that a social structure is needed or good. The ultimate weapon of reaction/neoreaction is that claim that anti-liberal structures are inevitable given the workings of nature (gnon) and human nature; that liberal values are deathwish values.

Plus, saying you’re a traditionalist sounds so musty and fuddy-duddy; saying you’re a teleofunctionalist sounds modern and sexy. So my proposal is to stop calling ourselves traditionalists and start calling ourselves teleofunctionalists. If you really want to sex it up call it bio-social teleofunctionalism, which encapsulates the Dark Enlightenment in a nutshell.

grazemasque #dunning-kruger deviantart.com

Good morning, climate shysters.
Yes, you. The actively uninformed.
Hey! Beyond Delusion. Wake up.
Have you you reached Peak eXtinction yet?
"You mean eXtinctum Ridiculum, Sir?"
Haha. Yeah. Bonus marks on your next assignment.

Watch your two degree tipping point, Climate Crassus.
It was plucked out of thin air, you know.
Phil Jones admitted that in a Climategate email, didn't he?
Been known for over ten years, to anyone who can read, that is!
You know there's a crisis, don't you?
A crisis of critical thinking! An intellectual crisis, you morons!

Has your paper been Pere reviewed, Fireball?
By Papa Francis and Darth Soros, I mean? (The rewl scoientusts.)
Yes, I thought as much! The "approved viewpoint" served you well, didn't it?
Cow carbon comes from the atmosphere. Did you know that? What do cows eat?
But you decided we should close down meat and dairy? Just , , Brilliant!
Let's take another look at "carbon pollution by beef" bollocks then, shall we.

Now, who hasn't handed in their "magic cows" assignment yet?
Dahh! OK then, show of hands who did? None of you? I see.
Look guys, I don't want to see any of you lazy chumps back here next semester.
So get off your paragraphs and write at least one backside, OK!
And mind your grammar too, if you want a passing grade.
Aye, dun backwuds I did. Glad to see you're still awake, Scorcher.

Now, you remember where to find it? It's part of last week's deviation.
So it's in the gallery, with all the other junk. Just look in the gallery.
Ye-e-es, the one with the cro-o-ows. That's the one.
Look, it's not difficult. It's just the carbon cycle, all right.
Standard photosynthesis. Then eat, munch, swallow. Got it?
Yeah Hotspot, I left out fart. Knew I could rely on you for that.


Eric Striker #dunning-kruger #conspiracy unz.com

[From "The Last Days of the 'Holocaust'"]

Holocaust revisionism is perhaps the most institutionally reviled, criminally punished and socially persecuted field of research in modern Western history.

Yet, on the much publicized 75th anniversary of the Soviet liberation of Auschwitz, the gatekeepers of the Holocaust continue to give ground, kicking and screaming along the way.

The latest example is a new book by former Museum of Jewish Heritage director David G. Marwell, “Unmasking the ‘Angel of Death’,” which grants many revisionist challenges to the legend of Joseph Mengele.

Marwell’s work is considered the most well-researched mainstream biography of Mengele to date. In it, he cross references witness testimony from “survivors” with hard evidence and primary sources, only to conclude that their “memories” were “unreliable.” In other words, they are lying.

Stitching together humans to create siamese twins, smashing babies against train cars, attempts to transform boys into girls – all of the barbarism etched into the popular mind about a German in a labcoat, Marwell concludes, is nothing but a pack of atrocious hoaxes.

Marwell does stress that Mengele was a true-believing Nationalsocialist, which in his mind is an act of evil in and of itself. According to the book, he also at times overstepped ethical boundaries, for example when studying the effects of food deprivation on the human body, but the so-called “Angel of Death” made up for this by giving subjects superior accommodations and privileged treatment when the experiments were over. The twins and dwarves he studied were treated kindly, even if looking at living people as laboratory specimens in any context is dehumanizing. By and large, the book admits that what is commonly known about Mengele is fiction constructed by rumors, novels and Hollywood which have been held as true thanks to Jewish “eyewitnesses” substantiating the hoaxes post-hoc.

Mengele’s main achievement at the camp, which Marwell credits him for, was containing and preventing a massive outbreak of typhus at Auschwitz in difficult circumstances. Alex McNabb had previously written about this, and was attacked by Zionist commentators for it. This saved thousands of lives, Jewish and Gentile alike. Mengele was not motivated by hate and sadism. His most intimate letters and confessions show only a passion for advancing medical science.

shoujogirlz #dunning-kruger deviantart.com

(The guy’s profile page is very NSFW, in case any of you click on the guy’s profile after clicking on the link to the DeviantArt forum. I also labelled it dunning-kruger because he is just so stubbornly anti-vaccine)

I honestly think you've missed the point. We are literally surrounded by life threatening illnesses, tetanus is just one of them. I seriously don't give a fuck about how lethal, painful or debilitating a disease is. I don't care if we're talking about the Avian Flu, Hep B, Ebola or the Black Death. Vaxxers can fuck the hell off, because they don't have the right to stick needles in people without their consent. End of story.

fschmidt #dunning-kruger reddit.com

For many years I had a fantasy about forming a sane community. The fantasy was to gather the sane remnant from this insane world and form a community for reasonable people. This was partly inspired by the concept of the remnant of the Israelites in the Old Testament after the fall of Israel and Judah. But this idea has a fatal flaw. There is no remnant. Humanity has become pure trash, there are no reasonable people left.

The Old Testament talks about such a time in the story of Noah. Clearly most of humanity needs to be wiped out. We have another example of this in the fall of Rome. If you read original source material from decaying Rome, you will see that these people were complete morons at a similar level to the morons of today. In The Antony Option I described the "good" people as those covered in Early Christian Lives who left Roman society to live in the desert. But from this book it is clear that these people were also complete morons. They had no interest in intelligence or quality or anything of real value. They just wanted to get close to God and hoped that this would give them supernatural powers. Eventually monasteries formed and some people moved near them. This had a slight beneficial effect in removing these people from dysgenic Roman culture. But the reality is that it took 1000 years and huge population drops before these people could escape the idiocracy caused by the decay of Rome.

I see no significant difference between the decay of Rome and the decay of modern culture other than that modern culture is almost universal. When Rome fell and Europe became a pure idiocracy, at least the Arabs, guided by Islam, were able to produce a civilized culture. But the fall of modern culture is producing a worldwide idiocracy that would take at least another 1000 years to escape from, if ever.

I view the traditional Anabaptists as the best group today. But they are not good enough. Besides the obvious problem of their pacifism, they are not eugenic enough to produce real intelligence. But even with these faults, it would impossible to form anything like traditional Anabaptist communities from any other population today. The conservative Mennonite groups were fully formed by the end of the 1950s, a time before today's idiocracy. Today people are just too stupid and undisciplined to form any kind of real community. This applies to all people of all races and all religions, all are just worthless.

Even trying to form any kind of informal group around some sense of quality is hopeless. My /r/GoodSoftware was an attempt to do this for good software, and it clearly failed. No one cares about quality in today's decayed idiocracy.

Having described the current bleak situation, I will propose a solution. The solution must be intrinsically eugenic since the best that one can hope for is to produce reasonable people in another 200 years. The current population must essentially be viewed as subhuman mammals with the potential to once again evolve into full humans. So the question is how can one breed such mammals in a positive way.

While humans have lost all intelligence and all sense of quality, there still remains a range in human reproductive strategy based on r/K selection. So what needs to be done is to form an informal community of human K-strategists where people can cooperate in raising their children. Such a community would naturally select strongly for K-strategy genes. When modern culture inevitably collapses and strong survival pressure reasserts itself, this survival pressure applied to a K-selected community would produce rapid evolutionary advancement.

Now I will describe how to do this. I would have an informal organization called something like "raising good children". It is critical that this organization have no rules and membership. This prevents it from being hijacked and taken in another direction. Anyone who wants to participate can, but the nature of such a group would only appeal to K-strategists. We would focus on things like improving education and health of children in the group, and in passing the religion of the parents to the children.

Who would I target for such a group. The obvious choice is Muslims. While Muslims are generally stupid (like everyone else) and undisciplined, at least they understand that modern culture is a threat to their children. And they understand that the modern world is a mess. They are too lazy to do much to fix this, but they would support in principle something that could improve the situation for their children. What I am describing here is based on my experience at my local mosque.

But there still remains a problem of motivation. The group should be willing to take real action of at least a basic kind to actually produce better children. The goal is to first improve the culture by actually raising better children, and then wait for selection pressure to improve the genetics. This should mean that each generation should be better than the one that came before it, reversing the current trend. So for example, parents should get rid of their televisions. But Muslims are extremely unmotivated to take action of any kind.

My solution to this is to get Muslims to visit conservative Mennonite churches. Most Muslims view things as basically hopeless, and a visit to a Mennonite church should cure this. Again I know this from experience, from taking the leader of my local mosque a Mennonite church. He was very impressed and was motivated for a while to try to follow the Mennonite example. But the problem is that the closest Mennonite church is too far away for easy trips. So I want to move where Muslims and Mennonites live close together, and I am looking into Harrisburg, PA for this. My hope is that when Muslims see how Mennonites successfully raise children outside of modern culture, and how Mennonites keep their religion across generations, Muslims will be motivated to follow this example.

But unlike Mennonites, I don't want to form a religious community. Islam has a lot of baggage that Muslims won't be able to fix until their IQ goes up by 20 points. So the solution is to make the "raising good children" organization clearly not religious and open to people of any religion. But I can't see anyone other than Muslims actually being interested in such an organization because no other religion recognizes the problems of modern culture.

If such an organization can be formed, I would hope that children raised in the organization would remain as adults. Naturally many wouldn't, many would leave. And this is good because this process would purify the K-strategy genes in the community.

For me personally, the next steps are visiting Harrisburg, PA often so I can judge it, and developing at least something of value for children to serve as a starting point. For this, I plan to add a 2D game API to Luan and use that to offer a programming class for children.

I have discussed this idea with my main contact at my local mosque, and he is supportive of this idea. I will visit Harrisburg, PA for a week later this month and hopefully learn enough to decide if this works as a location.

Liz Crokin #wingnut #conspiracy #dunning-kruger #pratt rightwingwatch.org

Last year, right-wing “journalist” and Trump–worshiping conspiracy theorist Liz Crokin publicly declared that if the mass arrests long promised by those promoting the QAnon conspiracy theory didn’t materialize by the end of 2019, she was going to “bow out” of the movement.

“I’m sick of talking about it,” Crokin said last January. “It’s so depressing and I’m just over it. I’m going to have to move on because it’s just taken such a big toll on me and my health that I don’t think I can stay in this fight if it continues to drag on for years and years and if these mass arrests don’t happen this year.”

Those arrests did not happen, but it doesn’t appear as if Crokin is actually going to abandon the QAnon movement anytime soon, as she posted a video on New Year’s Eve in which she predicted that actor Tom Hanks will soon be among the first of the high-profile figures arrested for his supposed involvement in satanic pedophilia.

“There is a lot of evidence and symbolism with Tom Hanks,” Crokin said. “You can go look at some of the work he’s done, you can look at some of the skits he’s done on Saturday Night Live, you can look at some of the movies he’s been in. There is a lot of symbolism in the work that he’s done. I think one of the first movies he did was [The Man With One Red Shoe] … It was a movie about red shoes; we know that red shoes are significant and symbolic to the occult because they make leather red shoes out of babies’ skin.”

Crokin went on to predict that Hanks “would be the first big name unsealed indictment” because the person behind the Q account has frequently used the word “big” in its posts and Big is the name of one of Hanks’ most successful films.

“Tom Hanks was in a movie—Big—and, of course, the movie is based off of basically pedophilia because he’s a little kid in a grown man’s body that ends up having a sexual relationship with a grown woman,” Crokin said. “So a lot of anons are theorizing that he could be the first big name unsealed indictment. I think it’s a really good theory.”

robycop3 #pratt #dunning-kruger baptistboard.com

When I was a HS soph, long before salvation, my biology teacher, who was a devout Christian, held up our textbook on the 1st day of class & said, "This book says, among other things, that birds evolved from lizards. Now, that's asking a lot from a lizard-to replace its perfectly-functional scales with feathers, to reverse the bend of its limbs,(Note that a lizard's limbs bend the same direction as ours.) trade its jaws & teeth for a beak, & toughest of all, change its chemistry from cold-blooded to warm-blooded. There are no 'missing links' half-n-half on any of those things."

That little lecture has stuck with me ever since. Years later, knowing evolution is impossible, I wrote to the astronomer Carl Sagan, whom I admired, & who was a staunch evolutionist, explaining those facts to him. He never wrote me back. Hard to believe such a brilliant mind was closed to simple, basic FACTS. (Oh well; I had to program my PH.D neighbor's Tivo for him.)

Any evolutionists who read this: Please don't be as close-minded as Dr. Sagan was. Please ask yourselves how an animal (or plant) coulda "evolved" from such different "ancestors".

BTW, the Eohippus, the "dawn horse", was about the size of a Collie, with a toe on each side of each hoof reaching the ground, while the modern horse has only vestigial toes fused to the leg bones. But, if eohippus was around today, it could mate with a modern horse, if physically possible, & produce offspring. They're the same basic species they didn't "evolve' into modern horses.

speedtypingincel #wingnut #sexist #psycho #dunning-kruger incels.co

Americans and UK need to stop using government definition to define "rape", "pedophilia" or whatever other bullshit "crimes"

Take for example this article. In this article this man who went to see a prostitute was jailed because "She said: ‘Hogben went beyond what was consented to by removing the protection, which the complainant will say was a condition of intercourse." Take notice that she said "consented". The rape law in UK is based on consent so that would fit the definition of "rape". However, here's the problem with using government to define acts:

If you use government's definition of rape then you're admitting you're an NPC who can't think for himself because whatever the government says... THAT IS RIGHT. If the government decides to change the definition of rape to "rape is coercion therefore violence or threats with a weapon" then the man above would not be a rapist. If the government decides to change the definition of free speech to "anything is free speech EXCEPT doubting Holocaust"... then doubting Holocaust is not free speech. If having sex with women below the age of consent (16 in UK) is pedophilia... then if the age of consent gets changed to age 5, having sex with 5-year-old girls/boys is not pedophilia!

The logical fallacies and NPC faggotry that normies wallow in is too much.

Rape is unwanted sex with an short/ugly male. Because sex with a tall, handsome male is always desired the foid will never be raped. If a prostitute is fucking an unattractive man, she's still being raped because it's unwanted, she just takes money for it. It's a transaction. Once the man exceeds the limits society has put on him (removing the condom and crossing the line as a short, unattractive man) it gets called R-A-P-E! You bet your ass that she wouldn't cry rape if the man was a tall chad.

Nonlinear #moonbat #dunning-kruger #conspiracy dailykos.com

Peer review, as hundreds of studies have now shown means friend reviewed. Major journals get pranked all the time which junk science, some of which nobody spots until the authors out themselves. Women can’t get published in A-list journals because of misogyny. Nor can most minorities because of systemic racism. So “well peer reviewed” is just a code for “white Eurocentirc colonial male privileged science”.

You didn’t even address the problem with lack of replication which is getting worse and worse as fewer and fewer experiments are actually replicated. Nor did you talk about the literally more than 1,000 papers each year that are being retracted or the thousands more that are in serious doubt. And the p-hacking where among other tricks you just drop a few data points to “clear up” your data. That is everywhere. Then there are the huge number of well peer reviewed papers with statistical analysis that doesn’t have confidence intervals. Serious studies have shown that means half of those papers are wrong. But we don’t which half.

I could go on an on. My point being putting your faith blindly in science is still an act of faith. Exactly comparable to trusting centuries of biblical scholarship. And like religion it comes with all the same human flaws that contaminate all calls/claims of “truth”. But you can’t see that because it is difficult to see outside your own paradigm.

So if you acknowledge some facts in quantum mechanics aren’t facts how do we know which ones are and aren’t? Given these authors are arguing observation makes the fact.

Ben Garrison #sexist #wingnut #dunning-kruger reddit.com


(Cartoon depicts Mother Nature spanking Greta Thunberg while a sun with sunglasses, a cloud blowing snow and a laughing polar bear look on)

Mother Nature: You lil’ brat! It’s called WEATHER!! It’s the FOUR SEASONS!! CO2 is good for the planet! You can’t fool Mother Nature!! Now stop bothering people!

Greta Thunberg: How D-DARE you!?

Princess Lamia bint Majid #dunning-kruger alaraby.co.uk

The West can learn a lot from Saudi Arabia when it comes to gender equality as Saudi women enjoy more rights than their Western counterparts, a princess from the kingdom has claimed.

Speaking at the World Tolerance Summit in Dubai on Wednesday, Princess Lamia bint Majid criticised portrayals of Saudi women in the western media, saying that they do not accurately reflect their situation.

"The West always thinks that women in my country are vulnerable and not being given their rights," Princess Lamia told The National at the Dubai event.

"I remember being in a meeting in the UK recently where they were discussing the problem of unequal pay between men and women and I couldn't help but smile to myself.

"Men and women have equal pay in Saudi. If someone is earning even one riyal less than someone doing the same job they can sue.

"That's not the case in the West, despite the fact they've been talking about it for years."

BabyFuck McGirlsex #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger incels.co

[JFL] "Female Orgasm" is the reason why you're an incel

By Professor B. McGirlsex, PhD in INCELDOM (Cambridge, UK), M.B.B.S (Kings College, London, UK), BSc (Hons) (APNP)

The female orgasm is the most useless thing on the face of this earth - there is no reason for it to even exist.

* No reproductive function
* No anatomical function

Female orgasm is an evolutionary quirk and is just as useless as

* male nipples
* The appendix
* The tooth fairy
* Females in scientific fields

Foids want to LARP as men, the gender who can have an orgasm every single time they fuck.

Men can fuck a foid, fuck a fleshlight, fuck a mouth, fuck a palm(handjob) e.t.c and they cum every single time!

Meanwhile a foid can have sex for 10 years but not experience even a single orgasm. If nature wanted foids to cum it'll have made it easy for foids to orgasm - but no, its extremely difficult or even impossible for foids to reach "orgasm".

* Scientifically speaking - the only sure way for foids to orgasm is by getting brutally and savagely raped

Fuck these foid cunts - when they cant orgasm they blame men yet its their flawed biology to blame + they shouldnt be cuming in the first place!

Why the mythical non-existant foid orgasm is the reason why you are rotting in Inceldom

* The reason why foids forsake their biological imperative of mating with their looksmatch is because they chase useless things like "foid orgasm". In their warped minds goodlooking = chad = good sex = foid orgasm & ugly = incel = bad sex = no orgasm
* Countless studies and experiments and also a huge wealth of anecdotal evidence have shown that foids are ruthlessly selfish and self serving animals and only care about their pleasures - which is why they dont care that they are perpetuating inceldom at an ungodly rate and would rather chase after "orgasms" than settle for their looksmatch
* The Dogpill exists purely becase of the foids unnecessary need for orgasm. Thats why they choose a canine animal with a grotesque dick to fuck because it takes a lot to get a foid to orgasm. Dogpill almost accurately mimics and simulates rape which is why foids love the dog pill so much. The wild uncoordinated primal thrusts of a dog penis closely resembles those of a rapist thats why the dogpill is soooo appealing. In this futile search for orgasm foids bypass and over look a large number of males who inturn become incels.
* The cock carousel is very appealing to foids because they are forever chasing the elusive foid orgasm. They waste their youth and virginity whilst chasing muh orgasms and they disenfranchise their looksmatchs whilst in this trivial pursuit. These disenfranchised men become incels.

Tobias Langdon #transphobia #wingnut #racist #pratt #dunning-kruger unz.com


Sex and race are, to the left, mere social constructs, abstract systems of delusion and injustice that can be overturned by human will and social engineering. It follows, then, that leftists will support and celebrate men who reject the social construct of sex and claim to be women. And leftists do support and celebrate such men.

Triumph of the Trannies

It also follows that leftists will support and celebrate Whites who reject the social construct of race and claim to be Blacks. But leftists don’t support and celebrate such Whites. Quite the contrary. While Bruce Jenner, a man claiming to be a woman, is worshipped and rewarded, Rachel Dolezal, a White claiming to be a Black, is ridiculed and punished. Steve Sailer and others have drawn attention to this contradiction, but I don’t think they’ve properly explained it.

Why do leftists cheer when men cross the border between the sexes, but jeer when Whites try to cross the border between the races?

I pose those questions deliberately in that form to draw out the links between the left’s love of transgenderism and the left’s love of open borders. The Jewish libertarian Murray Rothbard (1926–95) described this aspect of leftist ideology very well in this passage of an otherwise long-winded and boring essay:

The egalitarian revolt against biological reality, as significant as it is, is only a subset of a deeper revolt: against the ontological structure of reality itself, against the “very organization of nature”; against the universe as such. At the heart of the egalitarian left is the pathological belief that there is no structure of reality; that all the world is a tabula rasa that can be changed at any moment in any desired direction by the mere exercise of human will — in short, that reality can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings. (Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, Modern Age, Fall 1973)

Rothbard was right in general about leftism, but failed to explain that highly significant exception: why does the “exercise of human will” allow Bruce Jenner and others to become women, but not allow Rachel Dolezal and others to become Blacks?

Sex and race are both aspects of reality, but the left believes that only one of those aspects “can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings.” Why so? I would explain it by supplementing Rothbard’s explanation. Yes, he’s right when he says the left have a magical belief in the reality-transforming power of “human will,” but he doesn’t discuss what happens when there is a clash of wills.

The high and the low

Let’s look at transgenderism first. Men like Bruce Jenner and Jonathan Yaniv (pictured) have “willed” that men can become women and must enjoy unrestricted access to all female spaces. At the same time, some women — the so-called Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists or TERFs — have “willed” that men can’t become women and must keep out of female spaces. There is a clash of wills that is settled, for the Left, by the status of the opposing sides. In leftist eyes, the men have higher status than the women, which is why the men’s will prevails and the women’s will is rejected. But hold on, you might be thinking: How can the men have higher status than the women in leftist eyes? It’s easy: the transgender men have cleverly aligned themselves not with men in general, who are indeed of lower status than women, but with homosexual men, who are of higher status than women.

Trangendered men are part of the “LBGTQ+ community,” which lifts them above women in the leftist hierarchy. Take Jonathan Yaniv, the perverted and probably Jewish male, who claims to be a woman and has been suing female cosmeticians in Canada for refusing to wax his fully intact male genitals. If Yaniv spoke the truth, he would admit that he is a heterosexual male who seeks perverted sexual pleasure by passing himself off as a woman and receiving Brazilian waxes or entering female toilets to share tampon tips with under-age girls, etc. Obviously, then, Yaniv can’t admit the truth. Heterosexual men are wicked in leftist eyes and are well below women in the leftist hierarchy. Heterosexual men definitely cannot pass themselves off as women in pursuit of perverted sexual thrills.

Actual authentic lesbians

Yaniv and other “trans-women” must therefore align themselves with homosexuals to pass leftist purity-tests. As trans-women they claim to be members of a sexual minority, which triggers the leftist love of minority-worship. Indeed, Yaniv and some others go further than simply claiming to be women: they claim to be actual authentic lesbians. A pinned tweet at Yaniv’s Twitter account states that he is “One proud lesbian. I’ll never give up fighting for human rights equality. #LGBTQoftwitter.” Yaniv isn’t a lesbian, of course. Real lesbians — that is, real women who are sexually attracted to other real women — quite rightly reject fake lesbians like him, so the fake lesbians exploit leftist ideology again and accuse real lesbians of bigotry and hate.

Feminism has the concept of the “glass ceiling,” whereby women are unjustly prevented by sexist men from reaching the highest positions in politics, business and academia. Inspired by this, the fake lesbians have invented the concept of the “cotton ceiling,” whereby men like Yaniv are unjustly prevented by real lesbians from removing the underwear of said lesbians and having sex with them. Here is a trans-lesbian activist lecturing a sceptical TERF (i.e. Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist for those not up on the latest jargon) on the injustices of the cotton ceiling:

Trans women are female. When our female-ness and womanhood is denied, as you keep doing repeatedly, that is transphobic and transmisogynist. As I said earlier, all people’s desires are influenced by an intersection of cultural messages that determine those desires. Cultural messages that code trans women’s bodies as male are transphobic, and those messages influence people’s desires. So cis queer women who are attracted to other queer women may not view trans women as viable sexual partners because they have internalized the message that trans women are somehow male.

The comparison to what cis males say also makes no sense. What trans women are saying is that we are women, and thus should be considered women sexually, and thus be considered viable partners for women who are attracted to women. What cis males are saying is that queer women shouldn’t be exclusively attracted to women, which is completely different. (The Cotton Ceiling? Really?, Femonade blog, 13th March 2012)

It’s not “completely different,” of course. In both cases, people with penises are “saying” (and willing) that real lesbians should have sex with them. In both cases, real lesbians would be encountering the male genitals of real men. But the trans-activist believes in an act of verbal transubstantiation whereby a trans-lesbian possesses a “female penis” that, despite all appearances, is “completely different” to the nasty and objectionable penis of a “cis male.”

Aspects of religious psychology

I use the term “transubstantiation” deliberately. It’s a term from Catholic theology that refers to the supernatural process whereby wafers and wine transform into the flesh and blood of Christ during the celebration of Holy Eucharist by a priest. No physical or scientific test can detect this transformation, and to all appearances the wafers and wine remain unchanged. But traditionalist Catholics will insist that the wafers and wine are now truly Christ’s flesh and blood. If you disagree, you’re probably safe nowadays, but you wouldn’t have been in the past. It was very unwise to openly deny, let alone ridicule, transubstantiation in Catholic nations during the Middle Ages. And disagreements over the concept were central to the murderous hatreds of the Reformation. Those who believed in transubstantiation got very angry when it was denied.

This anger, which is part of the odium theologicum, is an important aspect of religious psychology, whether overt or covert — leftism can in fact be explained as a mutation of Christianity and Judaism. Overt and covert religions gain power by demanding belief in things that defy everyday reality, because such belief is difficult and requires a greater emotional investment. When we invest more in a belief, we have more incentive to protect it more strongly. And it is precisely because concepts like transubstantiation and the “female penis” are absurd that they are powerful. When we have an emotional investment in something we can’t prove, we react strongly when it is denied or ridiculed. That applies even more when we ourselves are subconsciously aware or afraid that our beliefs are baseless or false. Crushing external heresies can be a way of stilling internal doubts.

The “female penis” vs the “unisex brain”

And so religion and other forms of ideology can gain power by their contradictions and absurdities. However, in the clash between transgenderism and feminism, both sides believe in absurdities: the trannies insist on the concept of the female penis, just as the feminists insist on the concept of the “unisex brain,” namely, that there is no genuine difference between male and female brains. These two concepts are both biologically absurd: there is no such thing as a female penis, but there is such a thing as a female brain. However, if transgenderism and feminism are both powered by absurdities, why have trannies been winning the battle over the TERFs? Well, it’s partly because the trannies have the bigger, and therefore better, absurdities. For example, the “female penis” is an obvious absurdity, the “unisex brain” is much less so. Penises are out in the open, after all, whereas brains are hidden behind the skull.

And there is a continuum between a typically male brain and a typically female brain that doesn’t exist between male genitals and female genitals in the vast majority of cases. The psychological differences between men and women are a question of averages and tendencies, but the physical differences are generally stark and obvious (inter-sex individuals are rare). A certain group of trannies also have the stronger male will-to-power and love of battle, which is another reason they are winning the battle with lesbians. All this explains why the left supports and celebrates trannies as they cross the border between male and female. As a sexual minority, they have higher status than ordinary women. As a novel and exhibitionist sexual minority, they also have higher status than lesbians, who also have less will-to-power.

Better than Black

Indeed, as I pointed out in “Power to the Perverts!,” transgenderism has allowed some White heterosexual men to leap above the Black-Jewish lesbian feminist Linda Bellos in the leftist hierarchy. The White men are “transgender” and Bellos, although Black, is a TERF. In current leftism, transgender trumps TERF. Leftists therefore support the border-abolishing White men and not the border-erecting Black woman.

However, leftists would instantly support Bellos if those White men were claiming to be Black rather than female. Leftists want the border between male and female abolished, but not the border between Black and White. Why so? Again I would argue that higher and lower status settle the clash of wills. Rachel Dolezal “willed” that she was Black, while Blacks “willed” that she wasn’t. Dolezal was trying to abolish a border, Blacks were trying to maintain one, so a naïve reading of leftism would say that leftists should support “trans-racialists” like Dolezal just as they support transgenderists like Bruce Jenner. But leftists didn’t support Dolezal, and Blacks easily won the battle of wills. The border between Black and White stayed up, and Dolezal was ridiculed and punished, despite being more convincing as a Black than most transgenderists ever are as women.

{Submitter’s note: Langdon rants on and on… see the source link if you’re really interested about the rest of it}