#dunning-kruger

Not nearly as smart as they think they are

kingjameswriter1965 #fundie #homophobia #transphobia #dunning-kruger kjbisjesuschrist.blog

Another thing that fuels my righteous anger is that damned FLAG. Now, just to make a distinction. It’s a rainbow, right? WRONG! That is NOT a real rainbow. The “pride flag” is only SIX colors. Six is the number of MAN, and in this case, HOMOSEXUAL man. God’s rainbow has SEVEN colors. The sodomites are so against God and hate Him so much that they turned the rainbow into an abomination itself, of SIX colors! It leaves out the color INDIGO!!

HERE is God’s rainbow… SEVEN colors…

See that reddish purple at the far right? That’s INDIGO.

So why am I going on about this? Because it needs to be EXPOSED for the SIN that it is. These people are defiant, rebellious, and sick-minded. PRIDE, in what?? You can get married like NORMAL people do?? You can defile yourselves with one another?? You can adopt children (God help them) and “raise a family”?? You can flaunt your SIN in God’s face, and expect Him to back off?? Oh no, NO, my friend, GOD ALREADY HAS YOUR ETERNITY IN MIND. You’re the one who has to change YOUR mind!! YOUR DEGENERATE, DISGUSTING, FILTHY, “ALTERNATE” LIFESTYLE MAKES GOD ALMIGHTY SICK!!!

We are all sinners, folks. The LESBOS, BISEXUALS, GAYS, TRANNIES and QUEERS– EVERY one of them will fall on their face in the Lake of Fire one day and confess that JESUS IS LORD, to the glory of God the Father, EXCEPT THEY REPENT– NOW— and come to Christ as the GUILTY SINNERS THEY ARE. AMEN!! EVEN SO, COME, LORD JESUS!!

Kent Hovind (1991 “dissertation”) #fundie #dunning-kruger #crackpot podcast.sjrdesign.net

There are basically three types of religions in the world. The first type is atheism which says that there is no God. Psalm 14:1 calls the people who believe there is no God fools. The second type of religion is pantheistic which says that nature is god. This group says that the universe is in control of itself and knows what it wants to Pantheism imparts a divine nature to the elements. The third type of religion says that God is outside of, above, and beyond His creation. He is not limited by His creation in any way. This is the almighty infinite God of the Bible.

Kent Hovind (1991 “dissertation”) #fundie #dunning-kruger podcast.sjrdesign.net

INTRODUCTION
Hello, my name is Kent Hovind.
I am a creation/science evangelist. I live in Pensacola, Florida. I have been a high school science teacher since 1976. I've been very active in the creation/evolution controversy for quite some time. As an evangelist, God has given me the opportunity to preach and teach the wonderful story of His marvelous creation over 400 times each year to churches, schools (public and private), parent groups, youth groups, on the radio, and in university dabates. It is my burning desire to help Christians get back to a simple faith in God's Word. Satan's method has always been to instill doubt in God's Word. The first sentence that came from Satan that is recorded for us in the Bible is: "Yea, hath God said?" He started by questioning God's Word in the garden of Eden. It worked there so he has used it ever since.
In the twentieth century the major attack Satan has launched has been against the first eleven chapters of Genesis. He knows that the entire Bible stands or falls on the validity of these chapters. I believe that the Bible is the infallible, inerrant, inspired, perfect Word of God. I believe that the Bible needs to be read and believed as it stands. Christians are often guilty of neglecting or twisting the Bible to fit their lifestyle or their preconceived ideas.
In this book· I'll be covering, in a nutshell, the creation/evolution controversy. I will explain why it is so important, the effects that the theory of evolution has had on our society, the creation alternative, and what we should do about the problem. I will try to answer questions that modern science has raised from a Seriptural viewpoint. I am, without apology, a Bible-believing Christian. . I have been saved for twenty-two years by the blood of Jesus Christ, God's Son. I believe that God's Word is infallible and flawless in every detail. If the Bible says that something was created a certain way, then that is just the way it happened. Now, as a science teacher, I want to keep an open mind and understand why, how, and when God created the earth, if those things can be known. There are some things we cannot understand, and some things I believe that we can. I will be quick to point out that "there is nothing new under the sun." Most of my ideas are the result of the input of hundreds of Godly men and women through the years. I have attempted in this book to simply explain the things I have learned through many years of studying both science and the Bible. In the last twenty-two years I have read hundreds of books by creationists and evolutionists alike on the subject of origins. Many great thinkers and scientists have had an influence on me. lowe much to many, but I must in the final analysis, take the blame/credit for what
is written in this book. Many things I can document and verify with the "experts" (whatever an expert is). Some things in this book I couldn't prove to anyone. I only ask that you realistically look at the ideas presented and ask yourself the simple question, "does this key open the lock, does this answer the question?" be right. If it does--it just might Only God knows all the details of how it really happened. I believe He has revealed many details about the original creation in His book the Bible. Everything else we come up with down here is just our theory. My weekly radio broadcast has been instrumental in answering a number of questions about the creation/evolution controversy. I have tried to answer questions as thoroughly and scripturally as I know how. Each broadcast dealt with a different topic. We have selected some of the most helpful topics and developed them into chapters toward this book. The chapters, and consequently the subject matter of the book, begins by discussing the history of evolution. Where did we get this crazy idea anyway? The second chapter deals with the fact that evolution is a religion and not a science, and therefore, should be excluded from public school curriculum. The third chapter deals with the effects of evolution. What has the teaching of evolution brought to the world in the way of good or harm? In the fourth chapter we deal with the subject of time. How old is the earth? In the fifth chapter we discuss the Big Bang theory. In the sixth chapter we give information about the Geologic Column, the foundation of all evolutionary teaching. In chapter seven we answer questions about radio carbon dating. Chapter eight gives the truth about cave men. Chapter nine discusses the "best evidence" evolutionists have for evolution, that is, archaeopteryx. Chapter ten answers the question, "Has science created life in the laboratory?" We took ten chapters of the book to destroy the edifice of evolution, and clear away the rubble so that we could build on a clean foundation. Several legitimate questions about the creation account given in the Bible need to be answered. Number one, "Don't all scientists believe in evolution?" In chapter eleven we discuss scientists, past and present, who were creationists. In chapter twelve, we answey a commonly raised complaint, "Genesis 1 conflicts with Genesis 2." In chapter thirteen we give interesting evidence that dinosaurs are mentioned in the Bible. I believe that dinosaurs are not only in the Bible, but they have lived with man all through his six thousand yeay history. In chapter fourteen we deal with the question, "Are dinosaurs extinct?" In chapter fifteen we discuss the human and dinosaur footprints found together in Glen Rose, Texas. In chapter sixteen we give the creationists' alternative theory to explain the geologic features of the earth within a six thousand year framework.
While all of the evidence is not in yet, I feel it is still the best option to take God's word at face value. The Bible has never been proven wrong yet, and I believe it never will be.

Kent Hovind (1991 “dissertation”) #fundie #dunning-kruger podcast.sjrdesign.net

Two blind men argued well into the night
about the great question, "Is there really sight?"
Said one to the other (and quite fervently)
"There cannot be colors or else we could see!
So take red and green and blue off the list.
If I cannot see them, they must no exist.
A crazy man told me the sky is bright blue.
I listened intently but I caught no clue
of anything out there to alter my mind.
I'm not deaf you know, I here perfectly fine.
Be quiet and I isten, and then you will know
that colors aren't real. How dare they say so?
They tell me that grass is some sort of green.
It looks like the rest of the world that I've seen!
It tastes a lot different than jelly or cheese
(if I smell it too long it sure makes me sneeze).
It feels a lot different that ice cream or snow
but to say that it's green? I'd have to say no.
I will not believe it until I have seen.
There isn't a difference 'twixt red, blue or green!!
And so the men argued with all of their might,
and I couldn't show them that they ~ere not right.
They cannot see colors because they re blind!
But I couldn't get the truth in their mind.
Until they are given the great gift of sight;
never, not ever, will they see the light.

Two atheists argued (on university sod)
about the great question "Is there a God?"
Said one to the other (and quite fervently)
"There can't be a God or else we would see.
So take that old Bible and God off the list.
If I cannot see Him, He must no exist.
Be quite and listen, and then you will know
that God is not real, how dare they say so??
A crazy man told me God lives up in Heaven.
I used to believe that when I was just seven.
But now that I'm older and wiser you see,
I will not believe it. You can't prove it to me.
I cannot sense God with sight taste or smell.
I do not believe in Heaven or Hell!
I've never heard God or felt Him at all.
If He's really up there, I wish He would call."
I said, "Listen fellows, you're spiritually blind.
You've only five entrances into your mind.
That limits your input. I wish you could see.
You can't fathom God or eternity.
There are lots of things that really are real.
It doesn't disprove God because you can't 'feel'."
So you two can argue the rest of the night.
There's no way to show you that you are not right.
When you get to Heaven (or Hell if you please)
you'll understand God as you fall on your knees!
I wish you could see Him or hear Him somehow.
But that isn't possible where you are now.
To deny His existence is really absurd.
You'll have to believe Him and trust in His Word.

Hunter Wallace #racist #dunning-kruger occidentaldissent.com

[From "Southern History Series: The Dred Scott Decision"]

Have you ever read the Dred Scott decision of 1857?

If you haven’t done so, I would highly recommend it. The Dred Scott decision was written by Chief Justice Roger Taney who was a native of Maryland. It struck down the Missouri Compromise which opened all the Western territories to slavery. Taney used history and law to explain why blacks were not American citizens and had “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” He also said the Constitution was formed by the Founders “for them and their posterity, but for no one else.”

[...]

Aside from his ruling in the Dred Scott decision, Taney is known for the [I]Ex parte Merryman[/I] decision in which he denied that Lincoln had the right to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and arrest John Merryman who was being held as a political prisoner in Fort McHenry following the Baltimore Riot of 1861. Lincoln ignored and defied the order of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

After the War Between the States, the Reconstruction Amendments had to be passed at gunpoint by the Republican Party to establish black citizenship and voting rights. This was because of Taney’s ruling in the Dred Scott decision and the fear the Civil Rights Act of 1866 would be found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The Founders had created a White Republic and a voluntary Union of sovereign states for their posterity which Lincoln and his Radical Republican allies in Congress overturned to create the centralized and consolidated empire that we live under today.

Return To Order #fundie #dunning-kruger #sexist returntoorder.org

Tell Netflix Amazon to Cancel Blasphemous 'Good Omens' Series

Due to an oversight by Return to Order staff, this petition originally listed Netflix as responsible for the offensive series "Good Omens." Amazon Video released the series on May 31. We regret the mistake, and the protests will be delivered to Amazon when the campaign is complete.

The Amazon series "Good Omens," based on a book by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, portrays the agents of Good and Evil as fighters in an arbitrary struggle devoid of meaning and truth. This series presents devils and Satanists as normal and even good, where they merely have a different way of being, and mocks God's wisdom in the following ways:

• An angel and demon are good friends, and are meant to be earth's ambassadors for Good and Evil respectively.

• This pair tries to stop the coming of the Antichrist because they are comfortable and like the earth so much.

• God is voiced by a woman.

• The Antichrist, who will oppose the Kingdom of God, is portrayed as a normal kid that has special powers and a mission to destroy the world which he doesn't really want to do.

• There are groups of Satanic "nuns" that are chosen to raise the Antichrist.

• The four riders of the Apocalypse, God's means of punishing sinful earth, are portrayed as a group of bikers.

In the end, this is a denial of Good and Evil: morality and natural law do not exist, just humanitarianism and an ultimately useless creed. This is another step to make Satanism appear normal, light and acceptable. We must show our rejection. Please sign our petition, telling Amazon that we will not stand silent as they destroy the barriers of horror we still have for evil.

u/TalkTactic #fundie #dunning-kruger #psycho archive.is

Loki - They are changing him from an Alpha Male to a Beta. Stop it.

Loki seems to be slowly getting more and more depowered as time progresses through the Marvel timeline. But what is sadly the most devastating blow to the character seems to be that the writers who help to craft Loki’s personality seem to slowly be stripping away his alpha male characteristics and replacing them with beta male ones.

You have to admit that in the first Thor movie Loki put it all on the line when he tried to betray Thor and take his place as the leader of Asgard. He was a Man on a mission, and was willing to take huge risk’s and chances to get what he wanted. But now, it seems that Loki just wants to have power and status.

What changed? Well I believe that it is his knowledge that he wasn’t a blood heir to Odin, and that changed his frame and mindset of how he viewed himself. It changed who he believed he was. Instead of having a singular mission, a cause that he thought was worth fighting for. He felt that he was the only one who saw how reckless Thor was and how foolish it would be to make a Man like that king of the realms. So he did what he thought he had to to protect Asgard. But after learning he was the son of a frost giant king that changed everything for Loki.

Now because he feels what was once his rightful succession to leadership has now been replaced with just trying to be authentically an heir of power. Now Loki just wants power and is directionless.

This has changed Loki from an alpha male that was willing to sacrifice society for his own benefit to a beta that will bend to the winds of change as long as there is some scrap of leverage and power involved.

Hopefully there is some evil redemption for Loki.

See our discussion about Alpha vs Beta / Thor vs Loki at our following link to our YouTube video. https://youtu.be/dXyBZVXrvHA?list=PL_R0PYzy4FL3_QwQla1v4kmPKGXCgRR8t

Comments:

u/[deleted]

Loki was portrayed way less masculine than he originally was in older Marvel comics. Tom Hiddleston gave a somehow "classical" or "theatrical", glamourous interpretation of his moods. In the comics, he's a born destroyer, he's also ripped and his muscles fill each panel with envy and rage. In the movies he's certainly a lot less virile than he actually was meant to be, so I think he was "Beta" from the start

u/TalkTactic

You are right, Loki is a born destroyer in the comics.

You are right, Loki is ripped and his muscles fill each panel with envy and rage.

I never thought about Hiddleston's performance as glamorous, but after reading your comment I can see your point.I think the most important thing here is that in the comics Loki is a born destroyer whose ripped muscles filled every panel with envy and rage. There were no ripped muscles of envy and rage in the movies for Loki, and that is just a disservice to mankind - nuff said

----

u/EvieWn

His primary motivation in the very first movie was an attempt to step out of Thor's shadow, implying that he's been following in Thor's footsteps his entire life. He's always been a beta, he tried being an alpha for a while and got himself thrown into the void, imprisoned, and his mother killed in the attempt, I think he's just trying to find a beta role that doesn't involve getting stepped on by Odin any longer.

u/TalkTactic

EvieWn you have some great insights about the movies. I think the implication that he has been following in Thor's footsteps his entire life is accurate.

"He's always been a beta, he tried being an alpha for a while and got himself thrown into the void," You might be right EvieWn, Loki may have always been a beta. So first I'd like to say that I don't think that men fit neatly into the dichotomy of Alpha and Beta. For the sake of discussion lets entertain that men do fall into one of those two camps, Loki very well may always have been a beta.

I think that many men in real life would identify themselves as beta and like Loki attempt to be "Alpha" and fail. But I believe that if men had to fit in the category of Alpha or beta then there would be some men that are naturally Alpha and some men that would be self-made Alphas. In one of our Talk Tactic videos we discuss three kinds of Alphas.

1. The Alpha who sacrifices society for himself.
2. The Alpha who sacrifices himself for society.
3. The Alpha who sacrifices himself for himself. you can watch that video at the following link if you like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdoUa7ZI2Hc&index=9&list=PL_R0PYzy4FL1GbXfj-UOqOFe9ze-qmjLz

Back to Loki, I want to say that Loki would very much fall into the category of 1 or 2 in the first Thor movie.Here are my reasons why I think Loki was Alpha in the first movie.

1. Loki sees that Odin is putting Thor; a reckless, arrogant person on the throne of Asgard. A person ready to war.
2. Loki sees that as a threat.
3. Loki chooses to foil Thor from getting on the throne.
4. Loki understands that he is risking it all but if he is successful he will benefit Asgard and himself.
5. Loki has a chance to align himself with his Odin and Thor after learning about their lies, but instead, Loki chooses to go his own way which means falling into the abyss into the void. If you read the James Campbell hero with a thousand faces, this sets up Loki as being ready to be reborn when he emerges from the void.

I think you may be right though, it is quite possible that Loki has always been beta.

We also did a video discussing how some authors define what an Alpha is. You can watch it at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6p9H4NImU4&list=PL_R0PYzy4FL1GbXfj-UOqOFe9ze-qmjLz&index=2

----

u/dangerphone

You know, they made Loki a woman in the comics for a few years. How does that fit into your alpha-beta dichotomy?

u/TalkTactic

Hello dangerphone thanks for that really great comment. Yes I realize that in the comics Loki did and would use and possess a female form. Also I believe that in some of the most recent comics there was a very ambiguous nature to how he identified his gender and sexuality. Just for clarification this is Michael Angelo responding to you because I don’t know how John feels about this. I see a contrast between the Alpha and Beta male in principle, but I think for the majority of men characteristics of Alpha and Beta attributes are embedded on a sort of spectrum. Each individual is different and what characteristics exist and the extent to which they are used in every individual’s personality is different. But typically if you are going to use the dichotomy of Alpha and Beta to divide men into two camps, the majority would fall into the Beta category. But back to your question, I think it is interesting that Loki who we identified as being the beta would also have been a woman for a time in the comics. Even now in his most recent adaptions his gender identity continues to be ambiguous and questionable. In a way Beta males take on feminine traits and characteristics and may also believe that feminine nature and qualities are superior to masculine ones. This would be in my view unhealthy because people should realize that masculine and feminine are both necessary and important and have been one of the key reasons for the success of humans on earth. But if Loki is a beta male than it would seem that his willingness to adapt his gender to acquire something he desires to compensate for something in his personality that he requires validation for, seems to be exactly the kind of difference we were describing between Thor and Loki in the video. How do you see things? I’d really be interested to hear your take.

u/dangerphone

Oh I was joking because alpha-beta theories are the domain of women-hating neck beards and alt-right children. I dislike everything about your theory and find it as deplorable and misguided as creationism. Sorry to get your hopes up for any sort of discussion.

u/TalkTactic

At Talk Tactic our mission is to encourage men who identify themselves as nice guys and to help them on their journey of reaching their vision of the good Man they want to become. Hopefully in that process of improving their lives they also improve the lives of those people closest to them which includes the most important women in their lives. Every person should seek to pursue liberty and happiness. It's unfortunate you chose to be vulgar and hurl insults.

u/dangerphone

I don’t believe I used a vulgar word but I understand if you read between the lines and got your feelings hurt. Loki becoming a woman, the power of Thor falling to Jane Foster, and many more characters exhibiting a greater diversity in gender, sexual orientation, and racial and ethnic identity shows that the comics industry is moving in the same way of the mainstream culture, towards a discarding of conservative and heteronormative values for values that foster the liberty and happiness for all. You seem to think liberty and happiness is earned by placing oneself at the top of a hierarchy, and so you will always be either be self-satisfied or insecure.

I do feel sorry for you, and do hope that one day you will look back on young self and shake your head ruefully. Because if you think if yourself liberated, you really have not found the edge of the cage.

[The argument continues in this fashion but the rest is too lengthy to post here.]

GigaSpergcel #sexist #dunning-kruger reddit.com

Foids have no understanding for what makes a great tribe. Foids only selfishly maximize their reproductive success on cost of the tribe.

Foids have nothing to lose if their tribe loses to a better one. The males of the better one will fu** them no matter what.

This is the bare and cold evolutionary logic in the femoid mind. It is as perfidious as only coldhearted trial-and-error can think it up. It is truly happening

You are not dreaming

WAKE UP NOW

The idea of a tribe is cope

The tribe is very deeply ingrained in our DNA. You cannot possibly get rid of it. You need to actively shape it into something that is stable and cooperates with the other tribes.

Ken Ham #fundie #dunning-kruger friendlyatheist.patheos.com

Creationists Are Mocking Flat Earthers for Not Understanding Science
By Hemant Mehta, June 3, 2019

Talk about a complete lack of self-awareness: Creationist Ken Ham says people who think the Earth is flat are being ridiculous because they aren’t basing their beliefs in science. And if they think the Bible supports them, it’s only because they wrongly choose which verses to quote as if that tells the whole story.

Someone should introduce him to a mirror.

His hilarious rant was prompted by a new documentary in which one group of scientifically illiterate fools tells another group of scientifically illiterate fools why they’re scientifically illiterate fools.

Now, before you contact us to tell us the earth is flat, first, please watch this documentary. We’ve thoroughly researched the supposed biblical and scientific pieces of evidence presented in favor of such a (wrong) view. It simply isn’t taught in Scripture, and the science doesn’t support it (although, sadly, many Christians are being convinced by cherry-picked data that only shows part of the whole story and out of context).

If you know someone in the flat earth movement, I encourage you to share this documentary with them. And if you’re part of it, I respectfully encourage you to humbly view this film and reconsider your position.

Ham also says people now ask him if he believes in a Flat Earth “all the time!” He doesn’t seem to realize it’s because when you promote fiction as science, you’re bound to draw in an audience that’s susceptible to bad arguments and distorted facts.

David J. Stewart #fundie #dunning-kruger jesusisprecious.org

A Multitude of Crimes Are Committed Every Time There is An Abortion

When a person commits a crime, they are never charged with just that one crime; but rather, they are indicted with a series of related charges. Literally, you can go into a gas station with a gun, rob it, and end up being charged with a dozen crimes! God does the same thing! He must, because more than one crime is ALWAYS committed when ANY crime is committed.

In Criminal Law, there are SEVEN ELEMENTS OF A CRIME that are considered by the courts when a crime is committed. (I am going to apply these to a woman who consents to undergo an abortion, which if tried in a legitimate court of law would send her to the electric chair for first-degree murder):

1. MENTAL STATE (Every mother knows exactly what she is doing by having an abortion—committing murder!)
2. CONDUCT (Exodus 20:13, “Thou shalt not kill.”)
3. CONCURRENCE (Abortions are scheduled—clearly proving that there was an intent to commit murder!)
4. CAUSATION (A definite crime has been committed—a human being has been brutally murdered!)
5. SEE ALSO (Ecclesiastes 12:13, “For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.”)
6. REFERENCES (Ecclesiastes 12:13)
7. EXTERNAL LINKS (Ecclesiastes 12:13)

I assure you that God is more righteous than mankind. Be forewarned dear reader—OUR RIGHTEOUS GOD WILL JUDGE UNGODLY SINNERS, FOR THEIR UNGODLY DEEDS, WHICH THEY HAVE UNGODLY COMMITTED, IN THIS UNGODLY NATION!!! Hebrews 10:31, “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.”

The Fundamental Fundie #fundie #dunning-kruger facebook.com

Swing and a miss!

When it comes to accounting for logic, critical thinking, and reasoning, atheists/naturalists swing and miss every single time. Consciousness and self-awareness are immaterial, as are individual human thought and emotions like empathy and love.

God deniers claim that these things are all the products of chemical reactions, but if that were true, then there would be no distinct individual human thought nor would there be any distinct intrinsic human value. ...If love is just a chemical reaction, then the meaning and definition of love becomes redundant.

God deniers know God exists, but suppress that truth in unrighteousness. It's like being in a pool and holding down a large beach ball under the water. It takes a physical, and mental, effort to suppress God's truth.

Romans 1:19-23 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.

👉Please LIKE our page & SHARE this post far and wide! To share this post, click the image, then click "Share". ✞

Jacob Harrison #wingnut #dunning-kruger kiwifarms.net

@BillionBisonBucks

Here's the problem. You seem to expect people would just go 'oh, okay. Well if the law says so, we must obey'. Even if your choice of puppet was enstated, parliament isn't going to just accept it. Even if parliament was forced guns-to-head to dissolve themselves for good, the people would just take the fight to the palace. The English are not adverse to killing their own royals if need be. More likely, your puppet would be every bit the useless, powerless national pet that royals have been for centuries now.

I very much enjoyed this telling depiction of your personally perfected England, though. Really shows everything there is to know about you.

As I said before, my secret society will infiltrate parliament and then pass an act that will change the monarchy and give the true king absolute power. So it will be done by legal means.

Andy Schlafly #fundie #dunning-kruger conservapedia.com

Matthew 16:19

King James Version:
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Proposed Conservative Translation:
"And I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven. Whatever you make binding on earth will be binding in heaven, and whatever you set loose on earth will be set loose in heaven."

Analysis:
Does this foretell the effect of the observer on eliminating uncertainty in quantum mechanics, which was not discovered until 2000 years later? Notice that the Greek literally says that whatever is bound on earth will have been bound in heaven, which is precisely the same unusual quasi-causation effect that an observer has in quantum mechanics.

John Williamson #dunning-kruger youtube.com

The idea that we are herbivores will never die - because it's true. It's also super-obvious - a quick glance in the mirror is enough - no claws and no sharp, rippy teeth (carnassials)! Also, little physical strength for our body size.

http://meatyourfuture.com/2015/09/herbivores-carnivores/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork Science (Dr. Sofia Pineda Ochoa)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmXynDLkbXY More science. (Mic the Vegan)

Quoting passages from books which tell tall stories of some imagined omnivorous past doesn't cut it.

We don't get hungry when we see roadkill, we don't get down and lick ants up when we see them on the ground - that shit's disgusting. If your feeding choices are worse than a chimpanzee's living in a jungle, you have a problem.?

/r/incels #sexist #dunning-kruger reddit.com

[Automated message, possibly triggered by using the word "personality"]

Women often euphemize personality for muscles and a masculine face. When gangbanger Jeremy Meeks was released from prison for robbing and beating another boy close to death, his girlfriend married and had children with him. Meeks improved his personality so much that he later cheated on his wife with a rich bimbo and didn't even feel bad about it.

/r/incels #sexist #crackpot #dunning-kruger reddit.com

[Automated message, triggered by "lower your standards"]

Since women are so used to having dating options, it is unthinkable to them that there are people with no dating options. But this is the reality: There are many males that have literally zero options. There is strong demand for even the ugliest of women. The top 20% of men get the top 80% of the women, and the bottom 80% of men fight like dogs over the remaining 20% of women. This is why in a sexually free society, even the ugliest most deformed obese women can get males of average attractiveness. People tell incels 'just lower your standards'. The truth is that there are not nearly enough deformed obese women for every incel to get one. Many incels would kill to have a deformed obese girlfriend, but even deformed obese women refuse to be with them because they can get better looking guys. When you have zero options, 'lowering your standards' won't get you a girlfriend.

/r/incels #sexist #dunning-kruger reddit.com

[Automated message, triggered by "self improvement"]

My friend was an ugly 48 year old 5'2 guy and he was having trouble finding a woman who wanted to be with him. Do you think he just sat around and complained about it all day? Fuck no. He improved himself and now he's a tall handsome 20 year old guy and he can get any girl he wants.

/r/incels #sexist #crackpot #wingnut #dunning-kruger reddit.com

[Automated message, triggered by "slut shaming"]

The way the sexual market functions is the same way real life markets function. The more sexually liberated women become, the harder it is for men to get laid. The only men that benefit from a more open sexual market are Chads. This is because women can continuously bang the top % of men without need of monogamous commitment which they'd need to get from the beta men. Tinder, online dating, social media in general are analogous to tax breaks which in theory would benefit BOTH women + Chads and men. However in reality, these things only serve to help the former group. Conversely, slutshaming ironically HELPS beta men get laid. It is analogous to a regulation imposed upon a business. While it decreases the amount of total sex had by women, it makes it so that they're more likely to be monogamous.

Scott Adams #conspiracy #dunning-kruger dilbert.com

image
[Boss: I invited a climate scientist to explain the risk of climate change to our company.

Scientist: Human activity is warming the earth and will lead to a global catastrophe.

Dilbert: How do scientists know that?

Scientist: It’s easy. We start with the basic science of physics and chemistry. Then we measure changes in temperature and CO2 over time. We put that data into dozens of different climate models and ignore the ones that look wrong to us. Then we take that output and run it through long-term economic models of the sort that have never been right.

Dilbert: What if I don’t trust the economic models?

Scientist: Who hired the science denier?]

Fuzislippers #dunning-kruger #conspiracy #wingnut #fundie fuzislippers.wordpress.com

The leftists’ two pet scientific theories are AGW and Darwinism; however, it seems pretty clear that you can’t have both (as I noted in my post Evolution or Global Warming: You Can Pick Only One); if humans are responsible for global warming or climate change (or whatever the accepted term is this week), then there should have been no marked climate change prior to the Industrial Revolution. And if there was no climate change (though we know from the fossil record that there have been multiple Ice Ages followed by global thaws), then there can’t possibly have been evolution (even Darwin said that species adapted to environmental changes such as global warming and cooling). Darwin was insistent in The Origin of Species that environmental adaptation was required for survival of the species: so why, if humans evolved from monkeys due to an unacceptable environment, are there still monkeys? Species simply don’t evolve in a static environment, nor do the faulty species who did not adapt and evolve survive the inhospitable environment that first prompted evolution of that unfit species. Or if they do, Darwin was wrong. So you see the conundrum for addled lefties.

[aside: The progressive/communist 100-year war on Judeo-Christian values is at the heart of forcing acceptance of evolution to the exclusion of creationism in our schools and society. Communism cannot work on a religious people, a people who have anything above the state; they know this, that’s why they use “science” to strip away parts of our religious foundation.]

This Catch-22 was compounded by the ClimateGate emails and the revelation that the earth is not only not warming but is now cooling and that we are again headed for another catastrophic Ice Age. Uh huh. (by the way, if you haven’t read Delingpole’s Watermelons, you really should.) These findings led to the die-hard climate hysteria nutters changing “Global Warming” to “Climate Change” (it’s just so much better to cover all your bases when you’re trying to stoke unfounded fear, create panic, and take over the global economy), but it hasn’t caught on fully, so we still see the schizophrenic posts and articles about “global warming” that talk about the coming Ice Age. Why, yes, Virginia, the warming planet causes the formation of ice sheets. Go figure. But to leftists this makes perfect sense. Somehow.

Jim #sexist #dunning-kruger blog.reaction.la

Evolutionary psychology predicts that a man will love a woman he regularly has sex with, who lives with him and that he lives with and will be inclined to look after her welfare, which is not necessarily the same thing as doing what she wants. He will do what he thinks is good for her, and make her do what he thinks is good for her, even if she wants something different. Because one flesh. Taking care of her is taking care of her capacity to bear him children and raise his children.

It does not predict that she will love him all that much, since Gnon wants resources transferred from men to women, and from parents to children, but it does predict that she will obey him, respect him, and physically desire him, in order that he can take care of her and the children they have together.

That is how it supposed to work.

If, however, she is someone else’s wife, or is staying with her family rather the joining with him to form a new family, thus someone else is going to be looking after his kids by her, maybe the state is going to be taking care of her and he is just passing through, then evolutionary psychology predicts romantic love, that he will flatter her and do whatever she wants, no matter how foolish, unreasonable, and self destructive, as Lancelot treated Guinevere.

So, evolutionary psychology predicts that males will primarily experience romantic love in the case of adultery, and to a lesser extent in casual fornication. It predicts that they they will experience the love that a husband bears his wife after they have been living together and having sex for a while. And that women will tend to be at best good wives, rather than in love with their husbands. The wife who craves the seed of a man more alpha than her husband says

“I do not love my husband any more, therefore it is OK for me to service this rock musician and his biker roadies”

but women never love men all that much. They are not supposed to. They are supposed to respect, honor, obey, and desire their husbands.

Thus, the second mention of sexual love in the bible: Rebekah meets Isaac, explains herself. “And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death.” The first mention of sexual love in the bible on the other hand has love and romance preceding sex and marriage instead of following sex and marriage – and things go badly wrong.

Romantic love was celebrated by the troubadours, and as depicted by the troubadours, was always adulterous love. King Arthur’s wife Guinevere desired Lancelot, and had sex with him, and Lancelot romantically loved Guinevere, King Arthur’s wife. In consequence Lancelot does lots of stupid humiliating self sacrificing things that prove his enormous burning love, Guinevere acts like an arrogant depraved obnoxious spoiled slut bitch, the fellowship of the Round Table breaks up, Camelot is defeated, and everyone gets killed.

This makes sense for maximizing reproductive fitness. Crazy destructive passion in order to cuckold other men, calm, gentle, firm, nurturing affection for one’s own family. Romance is what the troubadours depicted with alarming accuracy.

Romance is defect/defect equilibrium. Lancelot believes he is sacrificing himself for Guineverein in a Christlike fashion, and the troubadours believed he was sacrificing himself for Guinevere in a Christlike fashion, but in fact he is maximizing his Darwinian genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else. Guinevere also behaves badly to both Lancelot and to her husband King Arthur because she is maximizing her genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else.

Guinevere and King Arthur are in a defect/cooperate relationship. King Arthur is cooperating with Guinevere, by looking after her, and cooperating with Lancelot, in that Lancelot gets benefits as a knight of the fellowship of the Round table, while Lancelot and Guinevere are defecting on King Arthur.

King Arthur, of course, finds out, and Camelot gets defect/defect. Everyone is much worse off, and Camelot falls. That is Romance.

Sexual love is a bad thing except inside the confines of marriage. Men are supposed to have sex first and love later, and women are not really supposed to love men all that much at all. Nowhere in the bible are we told of women loving their husbands, and Guinevere treats both Lancelot and King Arthur very badly. We are, however, fairly frequently told in the bible of women seeking the love of their husbands.

If a woman thinks she is love, she is lying to get some alpha cock. Perhaps lying to herself because all the books she reads and all the movies and television shows she watches tell her that romantic love justifies and purifies every kind of horrible bad behavior. In reality, women are never in love all that much, rather they experience desire for love and sex, which they confuse with love when they proceed to do bad things in pursuit of this desire. Rather than loving a man, a woman desires to be loved by a man. If a man is in romantically in love with a woman whom he is not living with and having regular sex with in his own bed, he is crazy or evil.

What is the Red Pill?

It is the practical and applied knowledge of the Dark Enlightenment, the bad news about how the world really is, and especially and particularly the bad news about the nature of women. The Dark Enlightenment is science and the Red Pill is engineering. There is a certain cynical ruthlessness about the Red Pill. You are told how to use it against other people, and how to protect yourself from other people. Much seemingly virtuous and altruistic behavior, like the behavior of Lancelot towards Guinevere, is revealed to be foolish or, more commonly, wicked and dangerous. Even virtue is reduced to pragmatic self interest – virtue is trying to get into and maintain cooperate/cooperate relationships – as distinct from pretending to virtue in order to get into defect/cooperate relationships. Also, virtue is developing one’s own excellence, as for example lifting iron, or perfecting social skills.

What is the Blue Pill?

It is the official truth about the way the world supposedly works, and particularly and especially the official truth about the nature of women. If women were really the way that the blue pill says they are, then the behaving towards women the way that progressives say you are supposed to behave would work. Unfortunately, the way you are supposed to behave fails, and fails horribly badly with utterly disastrous consequences.

What is the Purple Pill?

It is an attempt to reconcile Red Pill truths with Blue pill morals: “Not All Women are Like That”. It is an attempt to avoid the most grossly self destructive behavior commanded by the Blue Pill, while still accepting that Blue Pill behavior is wise and virtuous behavior, rather than foolish, destructive, self destructive, and evil behavior. It is an attempt to reconcile with reality while remaining virtuous as Blue Pillers see virtue. But Blue Pill “virtues” are like Lancelot’s love for Guinevere: They are evil in themselves, and manifestations of evil. It was wrong for Lancelot to love Guinevere, as much wrong as it was wrong for Guinevere to have sex with Lancelot. Not only is it unwise to be the equal of your wife, it is also wicked. It is your job to supervise and discipline your wife, and some women, not all of them, not most of them, but quite a lot of them, sometimes need to be physical disciplined. You are wicked if you are not prepared to physically discipline your wife and your children in the unfortunate case that the necessity should occur.

What is the Black Pill?

The Black Pill is despair at the sad and cynical truths of the Red Pill, and the belief that we are doomed, that we as individuals shall not know a good sexual and family relationship, that we shall have few or no great grandchildren, that our race shall perish, that our homelands will be flooded by hostile angry sullen low IQ aliens who live on crime, welfare, and voting for the left, who get violent at microaggressions, that our civilization will die, overrun like Detroit and Salisbury by savages incapable of operating civilization.

What is the White Pill?

Deus Vult: That we will be victorious. That those of us that are lucky and strong will create proper families, that we will have love and grandchildren, that we will save our civilization and conquer the enemies of our civilization. That the able will rule over their inferiors, and men will rule over women, as is right for us to do.

Anonymous Coward #conspiracy #dunning-kruger godlikeproductions.com

Moon Hoax - Rockets CANNOT work in space

one of the biggest hoaxes of all time!

rocket propulsion cannot work in space.

you get tricked by being told about newtons third law and how the propellant pushes against the body so therefore (equal opposite) has to push the rocket.

but newtons third law ironically proves this to be false if viewed from the other way round, the propellant cannot push against a vacuum (zero force) so in turn (equal and opposite) applies zero force to the rocket/vehicle itself.

can anyone find me a video of a rocket, firecracker or something similar creating force in a vacuum?

/r/incels #fundie #dunning-kruger reddit.com

[Automated message, triggered by "entitled"]

'Entitled' is a fairly meaningless word that does not accurately describe most of the incels on this sub or elsewhere on the Internet. On one extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men how literally believe that they should be able to force women to date them. On the other extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men who are merely frustrated or sad that they can't find anyone at all to date them. This type of frustration is reasonable, since sex and romantic relationships are regarded by many as one of the most fulfilling things in life. The problem with using the word 'entitled' for both categories of men is that it lumps them together, demonizing men in the latter category by comparing them to men in the former category. If you wish to criticize our views, please be more specific than merely calling us 'entitled

Vox Day #wingnut #racist #crackpot #dunning-kruger voxday.blogspot.com

The Alt Right is of the political right in both the American and the European sense of the term. Socialists are not Alt Right. Progressives are not Alt Right. Liberals are not Alt Right. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right.
The Alt Right is an ALTERNATIVE to the mainstream conservative movement in the USA that is nominally encapsulated by Russel Kirk's 10 Conservative Principles, but in reality has devolved towards progressivism. It is also an alternative to libertarianism.
The Alt Right is not a defensive attitude and rejects the concept of noble and principled defeat. It is a forward-thinking philosophy of offense, in every sense of that term. The Alt Right believes in victory through persistence and remaining in harmony with science, reality, cultural tradition, and the lessons of history.
The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Rule of Law.
The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.
The Alt Right is anti-globalist. It opposes all groups who work for globalist ideals or globalist objectives.
The Alt Right is anti-equalitarian. It rejects the idea of equality for the same reason it rejects the ideas of unicorns and leprechauns, noting that human equality does not exist in any observable scientific, legal, material, intellectual, sexual, or spiritual form.
The Alt Right is scientodific. It presumptively accepts the current conclusions of the scientific method (scientody), while understanding a) these conclusions are liable to future revision, b) that scientistry is susceptible to corruption, and c) that the so-called scientific consensus is not based on scientody, but democracy, and is therefore intrinsically unscientific.
The Alt Right believes identity > culture > politics.
The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.
The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.
The Alt Right doesn't care what you think of it.
The Alt Right rejects international free trade and the free movement of peoples that free trade requires. The benefits of intranational free trade is not evidence for the benefits of international free trade.
The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.
The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.
The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.

TL;DR: The Alt Right is a Western ideology that believes in science, history, reality, and the right of a genetic nation to exist and govern itself in its own interests.

The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: "The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal."

This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.

Ray Comfort #fundie #dunning-kruger facebook.com

Arnold Atheist enjoyed learning about the fall of the Roman Empire as he watched the History channel. He clicked over to the Science channel and watched two programs. One was on the power of magnetic fields and the other was on gravity.

As an atheist, Arnold loved science. He equated the two. He glanced at his high-tech digital clock and thought about how quickly time had flown. He took a deep breath, grabbed the remote control, turned off the TV, called his wife who was working late and told her that he loved her. As he opened his garage door a strong wind messed up his hair that had been neatly combed a few moments earlier. He spoke an address into his phone, and let GPS guide him to his destination.

Arnold believed in invisible history. He watched a program on invisible magnetic fields. Then he watched another on invisible gravity. Then he measured invisible time, breathed invisible oxygen, used an invisible signal to turn off his TV with his remote, told his wife he had an invisible emotion for her, had his hair messed up by the invisible wind, and was directed to his meeting by an invisible positioning system.

Arnold was excited by the subject at his local atheist meeting: "Why we don't believe in the invisible."

David J. Stewart #fundie #dunning-kruger jesus-is-savior.com

I was recently thinking about the cow, as I ate a delicious homemade burger. Here's a great recipe for Hellmann's burgers. They're so good, I don't even use ketchup or mustard. As I ate my burger, I thought about how God made cows to feed a lot of people. This animal has short legs and a big meaty body, to feed a lot of hungry people. Evolution couldn't do that! God is so good!

dust to dust #conspiracy #crackpot #dunning-kruger godlikeproductions.com

The Ball Earth Theory was designed to conceal that Humans appeared on earth in the 1800's.

But on account that many flaws existed in theory TPTB funded the society of flatness to compensate for the flaws. Both theories have flaws, namely both advocate 1 sun and 1 moon.

The following will reveal the flaws of 1 sun, 1 moon:

Flaw #1: If 1-sun was seen everywhere on earth, then those north of the equator (flat or ball) when facing the sun would see the sun travel from left (rise) to right (setting). And those south of the equator-line would see the sun travel from right to left. This not what happens, everyone everywhere sees the sun travel left (rise) to right (setting).

Flaw #2: The sun isn't hydrogen.

"Hydrogen flames in other conditions are blue, resembling blue natural gas flames."
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

There's no oxygen in outer-space, is there? Hydrogen fusion in space would reflect the color blue. Shouldn't the hydrogen sun burn blue? Of course it would.

Flaw #3: The suns are electric and why solar eclipses are possible. With only 1-sun everyone in daylight zone would see a Solar-Eclipse.

Here's the solar eclipse diagram.
[link to szsdneperska.edupage.org]

Looks a-lot like the new moon diagram.
[link to moonblink.info]

One of these is definitely wrong, right? Wrong! Both are wrong.

Flaw #4: The new moon would always cause a solar eclipse and a solar eclipse would be seen by everyone in daylight zone. And with 1-moon pulling on ocean waters would instantly cause a Low tide everywhere AT THE SAME TIME! Oceans are all connected, 1 body of water, and this not what really happens in the real world.

Here's a photo of the moon taken by the International Space Community.
[link to universe-beauty.com]

The moon is in direct line of sight parallel to the ISS which means the distance the moon's at isn't where the books say it is, in fact if you've flown in an airplane during the day you probably noticed the sun wasn't that much higher than the airplane. And if you took a photo of the sun and compared it with a photo taken from the ground of the sun around the same time perspective of how you see the sun shouldn't be noticeable if the sun is a Gazillion miles away, because flying 5mi up won't change much in its perspective of how the sun is seen from the ground or from an airplane. But it does.

Flaw #5: If there were only 1-sun and 1-moon you wouldn't be able to see the same stars 12 months, and at their same place due to the 23.4° tilt of earth's axis towards the sun or away. Because according to the following diagram we should be able to see different stars at different times of the year and at different angles. On the flat society earth you would see the same stars, hence why TPTB funded the program.
[link to www.buzzle.com]

Note: The stars would be seen lower in winter, higher in the sky in summer. But not in the real world. In real time the stars are always in their proper light-station order. There are multiple suns on earth, and moons, and star-systems for your geographical locations. In conclusion, the earth is an infinite flat plane extending forever in the unknown universe. There are many continents beyond ours with many suns, moon, star-systems. It is highly likely that more life such as ours existed before our own and are highly more developed and advanced.

JBrentonK #fundie #homophobia #dunning-kruger atheistforums.org

Atheism. Atheism is not a religion. It is most remote from being a part of this great section. As we know, all atheists are in denial of the simple epistemologicial reality of the "theists". At best, atheism is pure closet homosexuality in public, where the disfigured, disgruntled completely irrational minded man says in front of everybody's face for no apparent reason, completely irrational statements, disguised on purpose which is what's worse. How do we expect a world of rationality and clear thought, to widen our horizons one day, when the level of rationality we see before us is as putrid as an example of this particular type of atheist? How can an atheist even claim his position is religious, or "one of religion", when it completely ignores this significant title by being nothing but a position of hatred? The answer is that it is not a religion, nor has ever been a religion. And the world better wisen up if it expects to one day have categories of religion taken seriously.

So I am furious that atheists believe they can be public homosexuals, physically and irrationally disfigured, christian hating "free souls", with no care to the consequences. But that nevertheless is not the point of my thread. I am furious at YOU, the atheist reader, and his public obvious stupiditys and personal hatreds. Furious with the many instances of atheist "morality" and hundreds of millenia worth of credit towards atheists/atheism. This is the essense of stupidity people, you will not be warned again.

By the by, this IS the reason this is in the religion subforum, I hope you all had a very lovely read, please feel free to reply in kind, I've waited about a month before returning to this low, debased forum for posting my thread about this topic. A topic about religiousness. Please feel free to "express" your religion. :angel:

Isiah4verse1 #sexisz #dunning-kruger reddit.com

The only thing of any value a woman can offer a man is an untouched vagina. This goes without saying and anyone who is looking for anything more from a woman (love, companionship, etc) is only kidding themselves. It has been/is/and forever will be a business exchange of provision and protection for sex and offspring.

There are a miniscule amount of virgins in 2015. View Terence Popps video where he calculates the amount of penis (in miles) and sperm (in gallons) the average woman today will have absorbed in her life.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CQkWUTDrWas

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NLQ7DSgYwkY

So essentially women today are public vehicles. But rather overpriced public vehicles.

Take the cost of a date, dinner and movie. I'd wager, it's about 20 bucks per person including refreshments for the movie and dinner at a decent restaurant will run you about 60 bucks per person bare minimum. That's $160 right there. Throw in about 10 for transportation and you are up to $170.

Now imagine waiting for a city bus, an older city bus that has been ridden by many. But you start in the morning when the bus has just come from the garage clean. Imagine when it arrives stuffing that $170 in the fare box. Anyone sane would think you mad. But you don't get a ride, instead the money goes down into the fare box but the driver ejects you from the bus before you can even step beyond the white line.

The bus goes on its way. You wait there at the same stop for the same exact bus to reach the bottom terminus, come up the other side towards the top terminus then come back down to you. You then take another $170 and stuff it in the fare box. Same deal, driver doesn't let you on. You wait again for the same exact bus to go down, come up the other side and then come back down to you. Not all dates cost $170 and we also have to factor in gifts. So this time you stuff $250 into the fare box. Driver doesn't let you ride. You wait again for the same bus to come back to you.

By this time it is already afternoon and the bus has already been patronized by many others. It comes back down, you drop, say, another two bills in the fare box, but this time you get to ride (sex). But as the bus has already been ridden all day your seat is dirty, maybe even wet! Everyone else got to ride for 3 bucks but you've already dropped nearly EIGHT BILLS in the fare box (that's about 4 dates and 2 cheap gifts) only to sit on a seat where many others have sat.

Rinse. Repeat.

This is what dating modern women is and we have millions of blue pilled men doing this and in many cases dropping a lot more money into the fare box only to get in return, a ride aboard a public vehicle that many others have ridden and paid far less a price to ride.

All it takes is one. Remember, an untouched vagina is all a woman has to offer a man. It takes only one person to get infected. Women shame men all the time for not wanting to pay full market value for a used NYC taxi or an RTS from LA. This is more than just about cost/reward but about health. They want you to not only date/wife up these sperm recepticles, subsidize said recepticles but above all risk your health on them.

My health, my choice.

Hope this puts dating into perspective, lurkers. You are better off hiring a professional. You get what you pay for.

Anyway you slice it. Women are a rip off! ?

YouTube user Turd Flinging Monkey breaks down the cost of dating/marriage vs MGTOW: https://youtu.be/2Al91Xbg_3s

YouTube user Tito the fresh exposes the truth about the "cleanliness" of females today:

https://youtu.be/rsFbDIxnh2g

The fact that many boyfriends and husbands have indirectly and unwittingly tasted another man's DNA was the final nail in the coffin for me. That second video will shock some sense into you. Lurkers and newbies, don't even pretend to think you'd be able to tell the difference either.

And as a side note, do not spend more than 40 dollars on a woman. Beyond that she becomes more expensive than a prostitute. At least with the hooker, those 40 bucks do not go to waste. You save yourself time and spare yourself the female BS.

juvinessen #fundie #dunning-kruger christianforums.com

poster: So if jellyfish and worms are not alive, what are they?

juvenissen: Good question.They are things do not bear any meaning of life. From this point of view, grass, or bacteria, or rock can be classified in the same category. Unfortunately, they are called life by scientist according to some specific criteria (debatable). If so, I can also "claim" that rock is alive by some good reasons.

poster: By the scientific definition rocks are not alive. How would rocks be categorized as alive?

juvenissen: A rock fits the majority, if not all, of the criteria used to define a life.

poster: Please outline what the criteria used to define life is, and how a rock fits the majority of them (usually it would have to fit all of them).

juvenissen: Sorry, I do not give essay as a reply here. I can answer question based on a common understanding. In this issue, for example, I can say that a rock does breath, and it can breath in air, in water and underground.

poster: A rock breathes? With lungs?

juvenissen: No. With skin.

poster: Do rocks have skin? Why does a rock need to breathe?

juvenissen:The surface. Through breathing, the surface becomes more mature. It does not need, it does. The "need" is not in the definition.

poster: You recognize the difference between breathing (respiration) and the wind blowing on something, yes?

juvenissen: Of course. Rock can breath in the ground, where there is no wind.

poster:So in conclusion: Rocks breathe through their skin, even underground. How do rocks "mature"? Did you realize that the definition of breathe is to take air into the lungs (except for the wind in a literary context). That being said, do rocks in space breathe? If so, what do they breathe?

juvenissen: Yes, every rock has a maturing process and stages. No. Breathing does not need a lung, even a rock does have space inside the rock where gas can be stored. For life lives in the air, in and out of air, by whatever mechanism, would satisfy the criterion. No. a rock does not breath in vacuum. It may breath one way (out). But that does not fit. Are you a scientist? If not, we may stop. All these talks could be very strange to you.

poster: What is this maturing process and stages? How does it breathe out?

juvenissen: Rock matured just like human. It keep changing according to the environment and it will eventually die. Material (gas, for example) leaks out of the rock. That is breathing out. I am a rock scientist. Rock is not alive (why not?). But I can try to make it fit the current definition of life. So, by the definition of life as you know it, a rock should be alive.

poster: So a rock feeds, respires, grows, reproduces, and then dies? How does it breathe in? Not by any definition I know. What definition are you using?

juvenissen: Rock does not reproduce in the normal case. But rock reincarnates. Rock breath in by absorb surrounding media on its surface.

Oboehner #fundie #dunning-kruger christiannews.net

"...overwhelming evidence supporting evolution..." *cough, cough, choke* Sure, it must be invisible or top-secret because no one has ever been able to show me any.

Zealots, such as yourself, simply cannot incorporate new data into your belief system unless it conforms to your pre-conceived "theory"; and that is why evolutionism is a religion. When confronted by affirmative evidence that everything in your Darwinian book of fables is verifiably untrue (gill slits), you do not incorporate that information, Instead you lie, twist words and spread misinformation in an effort to hold onto what you WANT to be true, shoving everything whether it fits or not into your little evolutionism box. It's really quite pathetic, from an educational standpoint.
Sorry :-).

Stephanie Messenger #quack #conspiracy #dunning-kruger #psycho theguardian.com

An anti-vaccination children’s picture book written to “educate children on the benefits of having measles” has been bombarded with hundreds of scathing reviews in the past few days in the wake of the disease’s current outbreak in the US.

Australian author Stephanie Messenger, who writes that she has raised three children “vaccine-free and childhood disease-free”, first self-published Melanie’s Marvelous Measles two years ago. But since the measles outbreak in California’s Disneyland last month spread to more than 100 people, it has received more than 800 one-star reviews on Amazon.com as readers laid into the title.

...

The book sets out to take children on a “journey to learn about the ineffectiveness of vaccinations and to know they don’t have to be scared of childhood illnesses, like measles and chicken pox”. With a cover showing a rash-covered girl playing in the garden, Messenger’s story sees Tina worrying about her friend Melanie, who is away from school with measles. Her mother tells her not to be concerned. “Many wise people believe measles make the body stronger and more mature for the future,” she tells her daughter, who then asks if she can visit Melanie and catch measles herself. “That sounds like a great idea,” laughs her mother. “Let’s take her some carrot juice and melon to help her get strong and recover from the measles.”

...

Messenger, in her book, claims that “often today, we are being bombarded with messages from vested interests to fear all diseases in order for someone to sell some potion or vaccine, when, in fact, history shows that in industrialised countries, these diseases are quite benign and, according to natural health sources, beneficial to the body”.

Ray Comfort #dunning-kruger #fundie facebook.com

"Except not every animal has males or females. Which Genesis neglects to mention. Why is that, Ray?" Cory Kent
Do you really think slugs and snails are "animals." They are not. They are what are termed “invertebrates,” which means they lack a backbone. They belong to a large and highly diverse group of invertebrates known as the Phylum Mollusca. You had better read Genesis again.

Philip Irvin #dunning-kruger #homophobia wnd.com

[part of an article that claims to prove that one can't be born gay]

As another of the many lines of reasoning showing the absurdity of “born gay,” let’s talk about bisexuality. What is a bisexual? Supposedly, it is someone who is 50 percent straight and 50 percent gay? Can’t someone also be a 60-40 bisexual or any other ratio? We speak of someone who is “straight with gay tendencies” – an 80-20 bisexual.

If a bisexual has a good relationship with one gender and a bad relationship with the other, can’t this “bisexual person” easily go from 50-50 to 40-60? Since we’ve already seen that homosexual ideology says it’s not even possible to determine who is/is not homosexual, it would be absurd to assert that a particular bisexual was born at 63.2 percent gay and must be stuck at that exact level for his entire life. By providing specific legal protection for bisexuals, discrimination laws acknowledge that we are all bisexual because we all have the full capability of going either way.

Also, if people are “born gay,” please explain whether pedophiles were born that way and if not, why is there such an insistence that their behavior must have been learned or chosen, but that of heterosexuals and homosexuals could not have been?

The idea that people can be inherently homosexual only makes sense if you don’t think about it. Homosexuality is about what a person does and not about what a person is.

Dig4gold #fundie #dunning-kruger evolutionfairytale.com

You could put a healthy living frog in a blender and blend it up then take the compound and wait and wait and wait but no life will spontaneously arise from it even though it started as a living entity. Even though you began with all of the components of life you would not observe life spontaneously arising from this mixture. Why? Because life only comes from life.

endzog #fundie #racist #conspiracy #crackpot #dunning-kruger endzog.wordpress.com

image

SARAH SILVERMAN’S GOD JAHBULON, A SPIDER GOD WITH THE HEAD OF A KING, A FROG AND A BABALONIAN CAT. THE GOD OF TALMUDIC JEWS AND 33rd DEGREE FREEMASONS. HE IS COMPOSED OF A TRINITY OF THREE JEWISH DEITIES JAHWEH THE JEWISH GOD (JAH IN AFRICA OR JAMAICA WHERE DREADLOCKS REPRESENT THE LEGS OF THE SPIDER), BAAL (CAT GOD) THE GOD OF BABALONIAN JEWS TO WHOM BABIES ARE SACRIFICED BY BEING BURNT ALIVE IN AN ANCIENT CEREMONY WHICH WAS KNOWN AS ‘HOLOCAUST’, AND ‘ON’ OR OSIRIS, THE SATANIC BABALONIAN GOD IDENTIFIED WITH FROGS BECAUSE HE HAS A GREEN SKIN. HOLLYWOOD SATANISTS SOMETIMES CAPTURE TRAMPS OFF THE STREETS (BECAUSE NO-ONE MISSES THEM IF THEY DISSAPEAR) AND KILL THEM ON CAMERA IN WHAT IS KNOWN AS ‘SNUFF MOVIES’ THESE MOVIES ARE ACTUALLY SACRIFICES TO OSIRIS. OSIRIS IS PARTICULARILY WORSHIPPED BY JEWISH HOLLYWOOD SATANISTS. IN ORDER TO WORK IN HOLLYWOOD NON-JEWS LIKE MILEY CYRUS, MADONNA, KANYE WEST, JAY Z, LADY GAGA AND OTHERS MUST ENTER A DEAL WITH THEIR JEWISH PRODUCERS AND AGENTS TO SELL THEIR SOULS TO THIS DEITY AND SWEAR TO CORRUPT CHILDREN AND YOUTH SO THAT THEY MAY SACRIFICE THEIR FANS SOULS TO HIM. IN EVERY COUNTRY THE BIGGEST PROMOTERS OF ABORTION AND WAR ARE JEWS. THIS IS TO FEED THE THIRST OF JABULON WHO HERE IS SEEN SCOOPING UP CLAWFULLS OF BLOOD WHILE FEEDING OFF THE BLOOD OF ABORTED BABIES AND CHILDREN KILLED IN LIBYA, PALESTINE, LEBANON, AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, AND SYRIA.

ALL HAIL JESUS! #fundie #crackpot #dunning-kruger answers.yahoo.com

[answer to a post from a Christian stating that there are some mistakes in the Bible, including confusion over the year of Jesus' birth]

The Jews used a calendar based on the lunar phases; nothing like ours. Every few years they had to add a month, like we add a day every four. It's been proven by using their calendar, Jesus was born year zero.

If you profess to be a disciple of Christ why aren't you asking HIM for understanding? He's happy to give it. I've had a thousand questions, and he's answered them all - in detail.

Disciples have relationship; we are free to speak and ask and knock and seek. You make it sound like you're reading just any old book.... There's nothing wrong with the Holy Scripture. Herod died in 4 AD not BC.

MajikFireHornet #racist #conspiracy #dunning-kruger seductivejewess.com

Sacheen Bigbeaver - escuse me, “Littlefeather” - a (supposed) “American Indian activist” stormed the stage at the 1973 Academy Awards ceremony and delivered a Marxist harangue on the indignities suffered by “American” Indians over the past few centuries. There are, of course no such things as “native American Indians”, since America as such did not exist until White settlers created it by subduing a chaos of savage, Asiatic tribes. All this aside, Sharon Sarah’s transparent alias - simply a literal translation of her German-Jewish real name – was shortly thereafter revealed (ditto her career as an active prostitute), and the whole farce unraveled. Collectively, this was simply another Jewish attempt to co-opt and control yettanother group entitlement (blacks, latinos, government employees, feministas, homosexuals, etc.) and subordinate it to Jewish, zionist-socialist purposes.

Observer #racist #conspiracy #crackpot #dunning-kruger seductivejewess.com

Ahh, now it all makes sense!

This is the reason why the Jewish controlled media promotes big breasts - because it is a Jewish trait. But of course, they could never admit the real reason why they promote big breasts, so they reverse engineered a fake excuse that big breasts were supposed to be a sign of being able to breast feed loads of children at the same time, or whatever lies they come up with.

Now we know the real reason. The reason why the Jewish controlled media promotes big breasts is because big breasts are a Jewish trait. It’s the Jews rigging the rules of the game in their favor again.

Millions of gentile women have been brainwashed into getting breast implants, just so they can have oversized, back strain inducing, saggy, Jewish looking breasts.

The Jews are brainwashing us all into acting and looking like Jews. It’s like a big giant long drawn out conversion process.

No wonder the Jews hold all the top positions in society – because they have been rigging society to favor Jewish traits.

John Woodmorappe #fundie #dunning-kruger answersingenesis.org

We must distinguish between the long-term care required for animals kept in zoos and the temporary, emergency care required on the Ark. The animals’ comfort and healthy appearance were not essential for emergency survival during one stressful year, where survival was the primary goal.

Studies of nonmechanized animal care indicate that eight people could have fed and watered 16,000 creatures. The key is to avoid unnecessary walking around. As the old adage says, “Don’t work harder, work smarter.”

Therefore, Noah probably stored the food and water near each animal. Even better, drinking water could have been piped into troughs, just as the Chinese have used bamboo pipes for this purpose for thousands of years. The use of some sort of self-feeders, as is commonly done for birds, would have been relatively easy and probably essential. Animals that required special care or diets were uncommon and should not have needed an inordinate amount of time from the handlers. Even animals with the most specialized diets in nature could have been switched to readily sustainable substitute diets. Of course, this assumes that animals with specialized diets today were likewise specialized at the time of the Flood.

ImplementOfWar #conspiracy #dunning-kruger abovetopsecret.com

I feel that the show "Jeopardy" is a conspiracy. I consider myself to be semi intelligent and at least somewhat competant in a broad range of knowledge. But when it comes to Jeopardy I just can not see how people can know some of the answers that they know and over such a broad range of topics.

I beleive Jeopardy is a psycholigcal operation to make the United States look superior.

People normally have specialized knowledge, not a mastery in such a broad range of topics.

Discuss,
(Yes i am serious)

Eivind Berge #psycho #sexist #wingnut #pratt #dunning-kruger eivindberge.blogspot.com

My rape advocacy is twofold. Two aspects of feminism currently independently justify rape, in my view: 1. equality and 2. feminist corruption of justice. Feminist rape law reform has more than blurred the distinction between rape and consensual sex. In many circumstances it no longer matters in the eyes of the law whether we actually rape a woman or not -- she can regret sex in any case and have us convicted of "rape." The law quite explicitly states that mere negligence is enough to be a rapist even if you had no evil intentions. So why should men care if we rape or not? Women don't respect us anymore, so why should we respect women? Hate breeds hate. I have followed the deterioration of justice closely throughout my life, and my heart has been filled with deeper hatred at every step of feminist legal reform. False rape is now institutionalized. At this point, I don't believe Norwegian women are morally entitled to protection from rape.

e_i-2 #sexist #psycho #dunning-kruger love-shy.com

And what is that difference? Interestingly I'm actually discussing rape with another new poster as well. . . since the difference between rape and domination is 'consent', what gives consent? Attraction, just with animals and their mating rituals of sexual display - if you are attractive, good sperm, then it's not rape.

Next page