All about the Gay Agenda
Matthew Vines: Do you accept that sexual orientation is highly resistant to attempts to change it?
James White: As is pedophilia, bestiality, desires toward incest, serial adultery, all sorts of forms of fornication, addiction to pornography, kleptomania, inveterate rage and anger, and addiction to gossip. “But such WERE some of you….”
Gang 'chases' 2 people out of Wembley chicken shop before 'threatening to stab them' and 'yelling homophobic slurs'
Police have said they are investigating the incident
A shocking video has emerged on social media which appears to show a gang of hooded men ordering two people out of a chicken shop in Wembley, before apparently yelling homophobic slurs at them in the street.
The gang confront the pair, who are waiting for food, and appear to repeatedly threaten to stab them.
Police have confirmed they are investigating the incident, which happened at a chicken shop in Bridge Road, Wembley, on January 20.
The men can be heard apparently telling the two people: “Get the f*** out now. Get out now. Get out the shop now.
“You come back, I’ll shank you both. I’ll shank you up. Get out. Take your f***ing bag and get out.”
Another member of the group appears to say: “Get out the ends,” while one of his accomplices laughs.
One of the two people confronted can be heard saying: “What’s the issue?”
They then say: “Alright calm down, calm down!”, then to their friend: “Let’s go.”
The two then take their food and leave.
Members of the group then can be heard shouting after them: “Don’t f***ing come here again, don’t f***ing come here again.”
The group also appears to use homophobic slurs along with their threats in the video, which is captioned Mashallah.
A spokesperson for the Met Police told MyLondon: “Police were made aware of this video on Saturday, January 29 which shows an incident at a takeaway restaurant in Bridge Road, Wembley.
"Enquiries are underway to identify those shown in the video.
"No arrests.
"Anyone with information that could assist police is asked to contact 101 or tweet @MetCC and quote ref: CAD 6345/29Jan."
MyLondon spoke to the owner of the chicken shop, Tasty Chicken, who said that he wasn't aware of the incident before police came to the shop on Saturday January 29 to look at CCTV.
Australian school insists it will only recognize students' 'biological sex'
A Christian school in Australia is asking parents to sign an enrolment contract that requires students to follow gender roles of their “biological sex.”
With the school year beginning Feb. 7, Citipointe Christian College in Brisbane sent the contracts to parents detailing that it will not recognize gender identity — only the gender assignment given at birth.
“We believe that any form of sexual immorality (including but not limited to adultery, fornication, homosexual acts, bisexual acts, bestiality, incest, pedophilia, and pornography) is sinful and offensive to God and is destructive to human relationships and society,” states part of the contract, obtained by the Daily Mail.
Parents were given a week’s notice to agree to the school’s terms.
“Whilst each student is individually valued and equally encouraged to pursue opportunities in both academic and co-curricular activities, I/we agree that, where distinctions are made between male and female (inclusive of, but not limited to, for example, uniforms, presentation, terminology, use of facilities and amenities, participation in sporting events and accommodation) such distinctions will be applied on the basis of the individual’s biological sex,” the contract reads.
It then goes on to state that failure to agree to the terms could lead to a student’s expulsion, or in contract speak, will “afford Citipointe Christian College the right to exclude a student from the college who no longer adheres to the college’s doctrinal precepts including those as to biological sex.”
[..]
In a statement posted on the school’s website, principal and pastor Brian Mulheran said the school “has always held these Christian beliefs,” but went on to contradict the contract’s wording, saying, “Citipointe does not judge students based on their sexuality or gender identity and we would not make a decision about their enrolment in the College solely on that basis.”
As I was taking pictures with the Proud Boys at the restaurant, a freakish transgender in combat boots, fishnet stockings and a man-bun snuck into our private room via a back staircase. It seems that a rainbow-haired waitress had spotted me during the 30 seconds I was passing through the public part of the restaurant, and had called in my location to her antifa pals.
Poor Fishnet Boy surely had expected to burst in on 99-pound me having a nice dinner with a group of sweet College Republicans. Instead, he (she?) walked into what must have looked like a Hell’s Angels convention.
Not so brave, now, eh, Fishnet Boy? He/She bowed his head, pretended to use the cash register, and quickly made his exit.
Kids feel pressured to figure themselves out too young, and aren't told they should constant revised their sense of self and who they are all while being bombarded with possible things they might identify as. You can see this with people trying to get their kids to figure out if they are gay, straight, cis, or trans before they are even 10 years old. They are given a weird warped idea of what these things are as they are told they are told things like "when boys like boys or girls like girls then they are gay" and little kids tend to play with their own gender and those are the people they like so they decide they are gay, attach that to their identity, which kids do with everything and healthy adults learn to undo and detach their interests form their identity, get it constantly reinforced and I have met a few people leaving their gay identity behind because it was something they make a decision on before they understood what it meant and felt pressured to stick to it. Similarly this happens with gender nonconforming kids being told they are trans when no, little Sally is just a tomgirl, and Billy just likes horses, but the troons are the biggest advocates for strict gender conformity, some of which I think is projections.
{from 2017}
It's over for Kevin Spacey. The irony of his show being called House of Cards is funny to everyone except the producers of the show.
Hollywood has been feeding me very well in the last three weeks. I now have more blog material than I need and the actual time to do some blogging which is woefully rare due to my job.
Anyhow, the homosexual pursuit of underage males is the dirtiest ex-secret of the glbt community. But, to my personal joy, the world is now starting to see what homosexuality is all about; turning young boys into gay men.
Apparently, when he was 24, Mr. Spacey was having a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old boy. And, in addition to that, he was sexually harassing young men on the set of House of Cards.
I love having the weapon of truth in my personal fight against homofascism and genderinsanity. The gay community should have left me alone.
{from 2018}
The video above is the most powerful case against males in female restrooms that I've seen in at least six years.
Once again, school officials are more afraid of the homofascists in the glbt community than they are of right-minded parents who don't want males in the restrooms or locker rooms used by their daughters. Parents who's children go to this elementary school were not notified that males would be allowed in with their daughters in bathrooms and locker rooms.
Is it not wisdom to design school bathrooms so that only one person can enter at a time? Why not make many, one-person bathrooms in a rectangular or circular building, with doors only on the outside, in order to protect girls (and boys) from predatory males? With all of this feminist talk about "toxic masculinity," why are males allowed in places where females are undressing?
Males having access to undressing females in their bathrooms and dressing rooms is absurd, yet very few people have the courage to stand up to the glbt community.
Ridgeland Mayor Gene McGee is withholding $110,000 of funding from the Madison County Library System allegedly on the basis of his personal religious beliefs, with library officials stating that he has demanded that the system initiate a purge of LGBTQ+ books before his office releases the money.
Tonja Johnson, executive director for the Madison County Library System, told the Mississippi Free Press in an afternoon interview that she first reached out to Mayor McGee after failing to receive the City of Ridgeland’s first quarterly payment of 2022.
Johnson said the mayor informed her that no payment was forthcoming. “He explained his opposition to what he called ‘homosexual materials’ in the library, that it went against his Christian beliefs, and that he would not release the money as the long as the materials were there,” the library director said.
The director then explained to the mayor that the library system, as a public entity, was not a religious institution. “I explained that we are a public library and we serve the entire community. I told him our collection reflects the diversity of our community,” Johnson said.
Apparently, the mayor was unmoved. “He told me that the library can serve whoever we wanted, but that he only serves the great Lord above,” she finished.
Do these two women look like they need more carbohydrates? Are they so starved for calories that their access to baked goods constitutes an emergency requiring government intervention? Alas, these two Democrats in Oregon took advantage of a law against “discrimination” that makes it mandatory for bakers to provide cakes for obese women who want to marry each other. The U.S. Supreme Court disagreed
Common courtesy once forbade the civilized person from making mention of what is called “sexuality,” and you can call me old-fashioned, but I lament how the Left’s identity-politics agenda has ruined our manners as much as (or arguably more than) it has ruined our morality. Homosexuality and transvestitism are not recent inventions, but public discussion of such behaviors was once more or less prohibited. Nowadays, everyone is expected to “come out” and publicly proclaim their carnal appetites, their fetishes and “gender” delusions, and we’re all expected to applaud them for their courage in “coming out.”
So the fact that Rachel and her younger brother are both homosexuals, and that their parents divorced when they were young, is not something we can explore from the perspective of developmental psychology. Why? Because this might hurt their feelings. This quasi-therapeutic attitude of protecting the allegedly fragile self-esteem of Victims of Society is what justifies the Compulsory Approval Doctrine. We are supposed to believe that homosexuals are delicate creatures, emotional weaklings who are just one insult away from committing suicide, and therefore everyone must constantly applaud them for their courage.
Well, excuse me for not volunteering as an LGBT cheerleader, but it so happens that I know actual gay people, and in general they don’t seem to be suffering from a deficit of self-esteem. The real-life gay people I’ve actually known were not emotional basket cases, trapped in a slough of suicidal depression; quite the contrary, in fact. Exactly how this myth of gay victimhood became part of our cultural narrative is a subject worth studying, but my point is that this whole bake-me-a-cake business and the endless witch-hunt against “homophobia” is misguided, and contrary to First Amendment freedoms.
In Germany, gay Roman Catholic priests are coming out, literally, and demanding that it is time for the world to see the ‘true diversity’ of the Roman Catholic church, and to demonstrate that the Body of Christ is ‘wonderfully queer’. Hoo boy. They are doing it, they say to put an end to ‘discrimination and exclusion’. To borrow an expression from the lukewarm evangelicals, there is a lot to ‘unpack’ here, so let’s get right to it.
It’s not so much that the Roman Catholic church is getting ready to welcome the LGBTQ into the fold, so to speak, because they are already doing that now on many levels. Pope Francis and his infamous remark of “who am I to judge?” when confronted with homosexuality in their church really tells you everything you need to know. But as the One World Religion continues to assemble itself, this type of thing will be ‘par for the course.’ Yes, the Roman Catholic church will embrace the LGBTQ, but also the Muslims, the Buddhists, the agnostics and just about everyone else including Bible-deficient Charismatics who are anxious to ‘return to Mother Rome’. Revelation 17 and 18 are quite clear as to who Mystery Babylon and the Great Harlot are, and guess what? It is the Roman Catholic church and the Vatican state respectively.
Regarding the ‘queering’ of the Body of Christ, let me just say that that idea is demonic in nature and satanic in execution, and can only happen in the counterfeit Roman Catholic “church” which is in no wise the Church that Jesus shed His blood to create on the cross. You can queer up the body of the Roman Catholic church members, that’s for sure, but the Body of Christ? No sir, those gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.
You see, your side, not my side, thinks of rednecks and conservatives and Christians as being obsessed with a psycho-pathological phobia and hatred of gays. Your side coined an silly term for the alleged phobia because it did not exist until you invented it: homophobia.
My question to you is this: do you believe that some, even most, hetero men have a visceral and instinctive desire to beat homosexuals to death?
If so, why is it bigotry if I report that your side believes this?
female only network makes users scan face in order to sign up - trannies seethe and review bomb app kek
It's seemed for a while to me now that radical feminists are trying to manipulate /pol/s natural aversion to trannies into supporting their feminist cause. There really is no reason to care about "trannies entering women's spaces." Like women's sport? Who gives a shit? The latest vanity app?
These things really are no big loss, and transgender invasion is maybe the most entertaining way to destroy them anyway.
*Danish Flag*
You're a retard if you don't see their cause the same as ours.
>Fact #1: Danes have smaller balls than Finns
This is true, actually Danes are already born with very small balls, tiny ones. And even after that they dont grow very much. Isn't that nuts?
Source:
https://slate.com/human-interest/2010/02/why-do-danes-have-smaller-nuts-than-finns.html
>Fact #2: Danes have the lowest sperm count in Europe
Yes, I suppose this does make sense since they have such small balls. But their sperm count is really, really low! Finns have the highest in Europe and the difference is massive! The Finnish sperm count is a whopping 126.8 million ml−1, while the Danish sperm count is a pathetic 68.5 million ml−1, only half of the Finnish sperm count!
Source:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3739152/
>Fact #3: Up to 60% of Danish teenage boys grow breasts!
Yes. When Danish boys hit puberty, more than half of them start to develop breasts. Yes, just like a girl! I suppose this is because they have very low testosterone which results from having very small balls.
Source:
https://sciencenordic.com/adolescents-denmark-videnskabdk/one-in-two-boys-develops-breasts/1399863
>Fact #4: Danish men have the softest cocks in the world!
Another truthbomb. Danes can not get hard. Their cocks are very soft compared to everyone else.
Source: NOS3 research
>tl;dr:
Danes are little balled low sperm count soft cock femboys that grow breasts
Anne and I have just left Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan where I launched an entirely new and non-confrontational strategy for protecting the marriage and the natural family: The Natural Life Movement.
As you know, I have been a soldier in the so-called culture war since the late 1980s and my response to the attack on marriage-based society has been consistent with that warfare paradigm. It was and is an accurate metaphor, because the political left been waging all-out war against Biblical family values since the Stonewall Riots of June 28, 1969 (Gay Pride Day). That’s when the LGBT movement abandoned its pursuit of “tolerance” for a new goal of “gay” supremacy. It adopted Herbert Marcuse’s Culural Marxist Strategy to end what he called “the repressive order of procreative sexuality” through “elimination…of the patriarchal and monogamic family.”
However, after Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s lawless declaration of a constitutional right to “gay marriage” by judicial fiat in the Obergefell case, and Barack Obama’s eight-year transformation of the federal government into an arm of the LGBT movement, the culture war from the pro-family side looks a lot more like a military occupation. Surveying the current battlefield I see skirmishes over transgenderism that look like “mop up” by the “gays” and looming on the horizon an enormous new threat called “transhumanism.”
The “culture war” was always a war against the natural order of human sexuality, family, community and civilization which all spring from the root of “one flesh” male/female complimentarity. Now that the left has all but won that war, the transformation of all other aspects of human society and the material world around us from natural to artificial will escalate rapidly.
Faggots always feel a need to flaunt their depravity and to force other people to be subjected to their sickening behavior.
They are incapable of keeping their perverted actions to themselves, as they are so shallow that the only thing they can think of to define themselves by is their obsession with other men’s anuses.
They like nothing better than to shock and disgust normal people and thanks to the ‘equality’ legislation that the Jews helped them to push through government, we are now forced to either watch their filth or we lose our jobs, as this unfortunate McDonald’s security guard recently found out.
"The doorman, who is employed by a third party security firm has been permanently removed from working in any McDonald’s restaurant.
This comes after Matthew Dummigan, of Leicester city centre claimed the doorman at the Market Street branch told him “no kissing allowed” when his male friend “pecked” him on the lips.
Matthew said that when he asked the doorman whether it would be acceptable if it had been a man and a woman, the doorman said “yes”."
I also think that two opposite sexes are needed for mating, and that marriage is a mating ritual used to establish chastity hence paternity, ergo the ritual is not merely unneeded, but actually absurd and pointless, if used to celebrate the erotic non-mating behaviors of two or more non-mates not of the opposite sex, where neither chastity is sought nor paternity is possible.
Sorry for shocking you with my bigotry. In the old days, bigotry was called logic.
One of the greatest innovations of postmodernism is the removal of all traces of logic from public discourse.
Related to the topic at hand, the way MTFs are treated in gay male spaces online is probably completely different from how they would be treated IRL.
On occasion, I will see someone white knighting for troons by criticizing that gay men call vaginas gross because it hurts troon feelings and "not all gay men have penises." Of course, since this is on the internet, there is no way to know if the person saying this is actually a gay man. They probably are not. It is ironic troons want gay men to stop bonding over disliking vaginas, since that is kind of one of the few things all gay men have in common.
Another thing I have seen, primarily on Reddit, is an NSFW picture or video of a FTM in a subreddit that dedicated to gay men. These posts often get a decent amount of upvotes. Think of it like when a troon posts a shitty nail job on a nail art subreddit; they get showered in praise. I see three reasons for someone upvoting it: 1. societal pressure to conform to wokeness and pretend that the woman is a man; 2. the people upvoting are not gay at all, but are bisexual men or straight women; or 3. the person upvoting is a troon. It is an incredibly jarring experience to be a gay man scrolling through one of these subreddits and suddenly being confronted with pictures of someone with a hairy chest, beard, and labia, or worse, a testosterone-engorged clitoris.
[…]
Woke societal pressure may make some gay men feel obligated to at least make these women feel welcome in gay male spaces, but they would never consider dating one of them.
Justine's father was actually Fidel Castro. In 1968, Russian defector Igor Gouzenko warned that Trudeau "would become another Castro and turn Canada into another Cuba."
Fidelito's cuckold "father" Pierre Elliot Trudeau (1919-2000) was Canadian Prime Minister from 1968-1979 and 1980-1984. His file was destroyed because he was a Communist (Illuminati) agent. Most "leaders" are Freemasons. The goal of Freemasonry is Rothschild (Cabalist Jewish, i.e. Satanic) world tyranny, i.e. Communism or "globalism." Communism is monopoly (i.e. banker controlled) capitalism. Trudeau took the first steps toward normalizing homosexuality and making European Canadians a minority, i.e. "multiculturalism." Castro's son is following in Trudeau's footsteps.
<...>
JUSTINE TRUDEAU CASTRO
The Illuminati are sexual deviants. They abuse their own children as part of the brainwashing process. There is a suggestion that this happened to Justine.
In her book, TRANCE-FORMATION OF AMERICA (1995) MK-ULTRA survivor Cathy O'Brien stated that many world leaders, including Pierre Trudeau and Brian Mulroney, are pedophiles. She met them in the course of her life as a sex slave trained (with her young daughter) to service high-profile politicians. Other sources support Cathy O'Brien's allegations.
margie.jpg(Margaret Trudeau's face says it all)
Pierre's 1968 marriage to Margaret was "arranged" by the military. The couple was programmed with LSD at a remote farm in British Columbia.
This might explain why Margaret was passed around to Fidel Castro.
<...>
it looks like a duck, and walks and talks like a duck, it's a duck.
{from 2014}
This, in fact, is what the Leftists hold to be their qualifications to make a moral judgment. Ask any of them. They will tell you repeatedly, so vehemently that one cannot get in a word edgewise, that they make no moral judgments, that making judgments is wrong, and that to make a judgment even in one's thought is wrong -- they call this bigotry, because they call everything by the word that means the opposite of what they really mean.
The people not upset about this are not fans of the show, because to be a fan means to use one's judgment to judge the show as being well crafted and the story well told. The decision was poor story telling, and that would be obvious - no matter what one's opinion about the morality or desirability or corrosive effect on society of sexual perversion.
What is the lesson here for little boys and girls watching the show? That every friend of yours, male or female, secretly craves sexual congress with you? That to be a policeman means you can neither have the magical girl nor the attractive rich girl, but you are a big loser, and they go off with each other? That family means nothing, that sex is entertainment and means nothing, that life means nothing, that ergo young women should act like bigmouthed jerks? That a woman in a leadership role is not a princess, prophetess nor priestess but is instead a pervertess?
He made the best of a bad situation by framing the fast-tracking as yet another example of his genuinely superior executive skills, while in reality ALL the globalist players wanted to neutralize the legal and ethical barriers to the world's first "universal" vaccine and its promise of vast profits. They only needed President Trump not to oppose them.
That forced surrender to Big Pharma was also sweet revenge against President Trump for his interference with their domestic price-gouging policies. (Here's the most recent example of their longstanding brazen greed.) If you recall, he heroically tried to force price cuts on numerous drugs such as insulin, and had some limited success. But Big Pharma not only won that battle, they made sure he would be punished for having defied them. The all smiles "vaccine" rollout was President Trump's punishment in the same way that being forced to nominate LGBT supremacist Anthony Kennedy to the Supreme Court was President Ronald Reagan's punishment for having tried to put Robert Bork there (a second Scalia who would have solidified a pro-family conservative majority).
Waiting on China to call Joe and tell him to knock it off with the development of actual weapons and stick to having fagg*tz, dykes, queers, and sissies as their "deus-ex-machina". Hmm, on second thought perhaps sending AIDS/STD-infected soldiers to battle against a foreign enemy might be the latest and greatest in biological warfare...
Attempting to explain gender theory to normal people is like attempting to explain a schizophrenic’s delusions to sane people. Normal men are masculine in the most common-sense understanding of that word, and normal women are feminine. Because the meanings of male/masculine and female/feminine are so obvious, from a common-sense point of view, normal people take these categories for granted.
"The notion that women form relationships with other women as a result of childhood trauma is a harmful, almost laughable, stereotype that lesbian and bisexual women continually face. It is simply untrue . . ."
Damaged, you say? How dare you imply Amy Austin is damaged?
But, suddenly there is a small glimmer of hope thanks to a bold conservative legislator in Texas named James White. White, who happens to be black, contends that Texas state law on marriage trumps Obergefell v. Hodges, the so-called “gay marriage” ruling, which was the pinnacle of Justice Kennedy’s LGBT championing-career in 2015.
I have always contended that the Obergefell ruling is illegitimate and void because both Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan performed “gay weddings” during the pendency of the case. That was the most egregious violation of judicial ethics in the history of the court, making a mockery of the bedrock principle of judicial impartiality every jurist owes to every party before the court regardless of their personal views or past rulings on similar cases.
On March 11, 2021, the State Board of Education unveiled the new 60-page proposed K-12 “health” curriculum. It was comprehensive – and alarming.
The outrage by parents across the state was swift. One week later, NFFV released a five-page list of the obvious “red flags” in that document.
NFFV began spreading the word and meeting with parents across the state. At one NFFV workshop, parents met with Mark Bonkiewicz, the NFFV leader, to ask what they could do. Mark worked closely with them to form Protect Nebraska Children Coalition (PNCC), a group specifically focused on organizing parents on this issue.
Protect Nebraska Children Coalition gathered over 20,000 Facebook members in four short months. Together with NFFV, they became a major force in the battle!
Second, in all the media-driven hysteria about the Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Bill one glaring fact has been consistently omitted. The fact is that Ugandan law is typical of most African law in that it tends to be very harsh in the letter, but very lenient in the application. I doubt very much that anyone arrested under the new law (if it passes) will receive anything close to the jail terms allowed for in the bill.
Third, and most importantly, there is one easy, guaranteed method of protecting oneself from ever being subject to the Anti-Homosexuality law in Uganda: Don't Commit Sodomy! We all seem to forget, in the dense propaganda haze of American popular opinion, that homosexuality is defined by voluntary sexual acts. Homosexuals are no more compelled to commit sodomy with each other than a married man is compelled to cheat on his wife.
In my opinion, the Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Bill is still too harsh in the letter. I would prefer something closer to the approach several American states have taken toward marijuana: criminalise it but minimise the penalty and turn a blind eye toward discrete violations. Indeed, this would be my prescription for dealing with homosexuality (and all sex outside of marriage) in the United States. This would preserve the basic freedom of choice for people who choose to inhabit various sub-cultures out of the mainstream, yet provide the larger marriage-based society with the legal power to prevent sex activists from advocating their lifestyles to children in the public schools or to flaunt their sins in "pride" parades through the city streets.
However, since I didn't write the Ugandan bill and have no power to redraft it on my own terms, and since the alternative to passing this bill is to allow the continuing, rapid, foreigner-driven homosexualisation of Ugandan culture, I am giving the revised Anti-Homosexuality Bill my support.
Overprotective daddies of teen girls - biggest scum on this planet
Of teen or early post-teen, who still may have too much control over daughter, and so debil may be against his teen daughter being with chronologically older man, and so debil, as simple down-to earth man may fail to understand uniqueness of his daughter and her wanting to be artistic, spirritual, indifferent to material amd social wellbeing and to marry spiritually compatible man of culture, not some socioeconomically well established normie he prefers
Finding good waifu of culture is already extremely hard, but thanks to overprotective daddies it becomes much harder, as necessity to search not only for waifu of culture, but also her to be having daddy of culture, or being from dysfunctional family, with daddy not present, or not involved much, (which can create other problems, various daddy issues)
Anyone who fails to understand overprotective daddies being scum - are scum themselves, lower than any tranny or faggot
Overprotective daddies of teen girls are not compatible with kemonisation
(submitters note: the OP has the words “proud hebephile/ephebophile” in his flair)
According to the third century Christian monks called the Desert Fathers, “pride” topped the list of the infamous Seven Deadly Sins. However, the Bible itself identifies homosexuality as the most deadly, giving it the special designation “toeva” (abomination) in the Leviticus 18 list of worst-possible sins which cause the land itself to “vomit out” its inhabitants, and making clear that widespread homosexuality was the cause of the incineration of Sodom and Gomorrah (Jude 1:7, referencing Genesis 19). That incident, unique in Biblical history, expressly linked male homosexual sodomy (and that sin alone) with the last-days destruction of the world by God.
So what should faithful Christians and Jews think of “Gay Pride,” the international month-long celebration of homosexual sodomy that occurs every June, drawing support from numerous governments around the world?
You’ll excuse my confusion, but amidst the hyperventilating screeches — GLAAD claiming that Phil Robertson was pushing “vile and extreme stereotypes” — maybe I missed what it was the Duck Dynasty patriarch actually said that was wrong.
“It seems like, to me, a vagina — as a man — would
be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me.”
Is it a “vile and extreme stereotype” to say that gay men engage in anal sex with each other? Or is it in some way objectionable for heterosexuals to say that they prefer the opposite sex? Why is this offensive? To whom is it offensive and why?
Here’s the basic thing to understand: there is one kind of sex that is normal, and that is a penis going in a vagina for the purpose of reproduction. If you have a sexual attraction to a child, it is no different than sexual attraction to another man, because it is non-reproductive sex. This is called “paraphilia.”
All of the following are defined as “paraphilia”:
Attraction to the same sex
Attraction to pre-pubescent children
Attraction to animals
Attraction to old women
“Consent” is a spook. No one can explain what it is. It is in theory “agreeing to something,” but then there are all of these ifs and ands.
Mentally ill people can’t “give consent.” This is accepted within consent theory. So, if you say a homosexual is mentally ill – which he obviously is – then how can he consent to sodomy? Homosexuality is obviously a mental illness, as it harms your body. These people get all kinds of diseases, which we know of, but do you know they have to wear buttplugs all the time because they lose control of their bowels? This is choosing to inflict harm on yourself and others in a pathological way, meaning it is the textbook definition of “mental illness.”
I have argued cogently that a woman should never be able to consent to anything, not simply because their decisions are so bad, but because they are psychologically incapable of accepting personal responsibility for their bad decisions. Remember that mother who killed her son recently? She blamed it on her boyfriend. Watch Hillary Clinton talk about the Benghazi scandal, or losing the election for that matter. All she does is go through a list of other people whose fault it was. Now think for a second: have you ever witnessed a woman, ever in your entire life, take personal responsibility for a bad decision they made? I’m talking about in your personal life. Just think about it for a few minutes, go through every horrible thing you’ve ever seen a woman do, and ask if you’ve ever seen one then say “this is my fault and I was wrong.”
Whereas marriage and family have been protected in human rights law from antiquity, including the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi in 1789 BC, the Jewish Torah in approximately 1400 BC, the Christian Bible in approximately 60 AD, and the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights in 1948, and
Whereas human rights in Western nations have been rooted in theories of natural law, from the writings of the Greek philosopher Aristotle, to the Catholic theologian Thomas Aquinas, to the American Founding Fathers’ Declaration of Independence, and
Whereas natural law recognizes a natural order in sexual and family matters, and
Whereas the natural law presuppositions of human rights were reaffirmed in the Nurnberg Trials of 1945, providing the moral authority for the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and
Whereas none of the of the foundational human rights documents from the dawn of time until recent years have granted human rights based on homosexuality, but in several cases have expressly condemned such conduct,
Therefore, relying upon more than 4000 years of legal precedent and the moral and religious principles we share with the vast majority of the citizens of the world,
We Declare that the human rights of religious and moral people to protect family values is far superior to any claimed human right of those who practice homosexuality and other sexual deviance, and
We Call for the European Union and the international community to immediately abandon any campaign to create a human right for homosexual conduct, and to restore religious freedom and family values to their proper superior status.
Have I mentioned this before? The endgame of all the radical secular left activists is really only about one thing: the complete eradication and abolition of Christianity. That is their ultimate and major focus. They hate God and his people, and they know that only the complete destruction of the Christian church will allow them the complete freedom to carry out their nefarious agenda.
Of course if they came out and said all this in so many words, they might get a bit of pushback. So as with all activists, they resort to euphemisms and they change the language. They know full well that societal change must be preceded by verbal change. Change the terminology and you can change the culture.
So they speak about their agenda items in terms of ‘diversity’ and ‘acceptance’ and ‘tolerance’. All that sounds pretty good – who would be opposed to those things? And of course anyone opposed to their militant mission is a bigot and intolerant and a hater.
Christians are the main haters in their view, and that means, among other things, that the Bible is full of hate speech. And now the activists have made it clear that even prayer is hateful! I kid you not. Consider what the pink mafia are up to in this regard in the UK
And the pejorative term “conversion” is a lot of baloney anyway. No one is forcing anyone to do anything. We are simply saying that if a person is pleading for help and counsel on unwanted same-sex attractions, he or she should be able to get it, and not be robbed of that choice.
But our tyrannical governments are now so utterly in bed with the militant activists, that they have declared war on freedom, and war on those offering much-needed and much-wanted help. People who want to “convert” from one sex to another (something that is physically impossible) are fully supported and assisted by governments, but those who want freedom in other areas are denied it.
The rainbow and trans fascists have already won. Governments are now doing their every bidding. This is the end of choice. This is the end of freedom. This is the end of tolerance. This is the end of diversity. Now the coercive state demands complete uniformity and conformity. All those who dare to resist WILL be punished.
Yet the activists and the rainbow State are fully in favour of conversion anyway. They want to convert everyone to their radical secular left worldview and ideology. They are seeking to convert ordinary citizens all the time. Everyone is in the conversion game.
Arthur: But that’s what drag queens do. Drag entertainment is heavily connected to alcohol and drug use. They engage in sexually explicit acts – that’s the whole point of “drag.” Why are those people presenting to kids?
Arthur: Would you allow your children to be around drag queens?
Library Director: Yes.
Arthur: You’re pushing an agenda here on kids to engage in behaviors that are harmful to them. You do realize that?
Library Director: I’m not sure I agree with that. But I appreciate that’s how you feel. So thank you for sharing.
Arthur: You are the Library Director, and are allowing a Drag Queen, a sexually explicit entertainer, pushing this perversion on children.
One thing queers really know how to do is to bully other people. Very few homosexuals actually want to get “married” but when they do, the first thing they do is go out and find a Christian bakery and demand they make a cake to celebrate this travesty of marriage. They just want to impose their own warped ideas on others and force participation. If they can bankrupt a business run by good, decent normal people they will be jumping up and down with glee.
Rachel and Laurel Bowman-Cryer. lied atrociously, claiming that a refusal caused them to suffer physical harm including “depression, hysteria, impaired digestion, weight gain …” Rubbish! They are greedy and wanted to get the enormous financial damages awarded under a rotten law.
The Kleins were subjected to a homo-fascist mob that boycotted their business, threatened other wedding vendors and subjected their young children to death threats.
Since 2014, the McArthurs. a lovely Christian couple who run a bakery in Northern Ireland, have suffered a litigation nightmare, since they turned down a request from LGBT activist Gareth Lee to bake a cake bearing the words “Support Gay Marriage”.
At this time, same-sex marriage was not legal in Northern Ireland, and it has never been democratically legalized since (it was imposed by the authoritarian decree of the Westminster Parliament against the will of the Northern Ireland people.)
Gareth Lee set out to entrap and humiliate the McArthurs, because as soon as they politely declined, on the grounds that, as Christians, they did not support this view, he sued them for discrimination. At first, he won and was awarded compensation. The judge at circuit level absurdly commented that to be discriminated against “because he was gay” was “humiliating, hurtful etc etc” whereas in fact, for the Ashers to be bullied in this way by an aggressive activist, and subjected to a lot of hate mail, was humiliating and hurtful.
After a four-year ordeal, the McArthurs got justice from the UK Supreme Court, which in 2018 correctly upheld their right not to be forced to say something they did not agree with. Compelled speech is a violation of the individual’s human rights. They had refused the contract, and would have refused it whoever brought the request, so this was not “discrimination”.
A gay Iranian man has been reportedly beheaded by his brother and two cousins after they discovered he had been exempted from military service due to his sexuality.
Alireza Fazeli Monfared, 20, was allegedly taken by the three male members of his family to the village of Borumi, western Iran, and murdered.
Afterwards, the three killers allegedly called Alireza's mother to tell them they had 'finished him off'.
Alireza had applied for an exception from the compulsory Iranian military service for being gay so that he could leave the country and move to Turkey to live with his partner Aghil Abyat, according to 6Rang, the Iranian Lesbian and Transgender Network.
But when the exception card arrived at his home in the city of Ahvaz, Alireza was not home and instead his half-brother is said to have discovered his sexual orientation after finding the card.
At 7pm on Tuesday Alireza spoke to his mother on the phone for the last time, Abyat told IranWire.
Shortly afterwards, his half-brother arrived at Alireza's home and said their father needed to see him and drove him to Borumi during the night.
It was here that his sibling and two male cousins allegedly murdered and beheaded Alireza, before dumping his body by a palm tree.
'There was no news of him until Wednesday, when Alireza's stepbrother called his mother and told her: 'We've finished him off',' Abyat said.
'In other works, he confessed to murdering Alireza,' Abyat claimed. 'They found his body under some palm trees. It's now with the medical examiner and his mother has been hospitalised because of the shock.'
Three men - believed to be Alireza's half-brother and two cousins by Iranian media - were arrested and they are facing trial for the murder.
[…]
In Iran, homosexuality is punishable by execution. It is thought that thousands of gays have been executed in the country since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
As a result, homosexuals are often targeted in 'honour killings' as their families believe they have brought shame to them.
A 2020 6Rang report found that six in 10 gay people in Iran have been assaulted by members of their family, while almost 50 per cent have been publicly sexually assaulted.
At Wichita State University, the student government voted to refuse official recognition of the libertarian Young Americans for Liberty group because it supports—gasp!—the First Amendment. Since other chapters of the group across the country have invited controversial conservative speakers to their campuses, the Kansas safe-spacers argued, it would be "dangerous" to allow them to operate in Kansas.
It's safe space for cows.And at Duquesne University, students have now declared that welcoming a Chick-fil-A on campus would put their "safe place" at "risk" because the founders of the fast-food company defended traditional marriage.
What the cluck? These millennial chicken littles have grown softer than the insides of waffle fries.
While they hype the existential dangers of exposure to discomfiting ideological dissent, the bubble-wrapped brigade ignores the real menaces in the academy
Reddit is populated by lots of people who sexually identify as people who have a sexuality which will never be able to have biological children, think homosexual, lesbian and go from there.
If they, themselves point out their sexuality (which they do, at every possibility) everything is celebrated, BUT if someone else highlights a non-traditional sexuality, they really don't like it.
The post was a light hearted sentence and is the kind of thing Brits would find funny, unlike the people here.
Bearded Non-White Tranny Wins Eurovision Song Contest
In a blatant act of psychological warfare against the European people, the bearded tranny Conchita Wurst has been declared the winner of the Eurovision song contest.
Such tolerance. So diversity. Wow.
Russia: Lesbian Family Featured in Grocery Store Ad Move to Barcelona After Online Backlash
This is awesome.
Good on Russia!
It's possible that these dyke lesbos are just trying to make a scene, but it was very clear that Russians took issue
A same-sex wedding is the ceremonial blessing of behavior the Bible condemns. Affirmation of homosexual practice is intrinsic to gay nuptials. There is no need to ask the history of the couple or their reasons for marrying in order to figure out whether or not the marriage is one that God would approve. In contrast, while two heterosexuals wishing to marry may or may not be obeying God’s commands, the institution itself is one that God has affirmed.
Things that are obvious from a common-sense perspective — if somebody’s asking for two grooms on a wedding cake, this is not a “marriage” that any Bible-believer could be expected to endorse — are obscure to those blinded by ideological abstractions. Chief among these is the Left’s idolatrous devotion to Equality
Gay activists do not construe their “rights” in terms of liberty, but in terms of radical and absolute equality. They insist that same-sex relationships are identical to — entirely analogous to and fungible with — traditional marriage.
Common sense resists this assertion, perceiving something fundamentally false in the gay marriage argument. Yet it seems common-sense resistance can only be justified by resort to religious faith, through the understanding that men are “endowed by their Creator” with rights. Eliminate the Creator from discussion, and it becomes impossible to refute the activists’ indignant demand for equality.
A new law in Canada makes it ILLEGAL to offer children OR adults treatment to convince them they are not a part of the alphabet group. But, of course, trying to convince people they ARE LGBT is still allowed and encouraged!
Homosexuality is not about opinions or differences, it's about what's right or wrong. Homosexuals aren't a race of people, they are just people who can't control themselves nor their urges. Homosexuals aren't the difference between black and white, they consist of every race on this planet. You volunteer to stick your genitals where they don't belong, not because you have to, just because you want to.
This entire war has never been about opinion or tolerance, it's always been about the Homosexuals getting away with their lustful practices and hiding the truth behind their gay flag. If they can conform the world, they own the world. Once those who support the Gay agenda gain control of the world, they'll drop the Homosexual agenda like dead waste. This is a plan that has been hiding in the shadows for a long time, and now it's being taken to action underneath our very noses.
Homosexuality is the biggest lie and fiasco since the war between the red coats and our freedom struck many hundreds of years ago, when the King over the sea demanded tax we couldn't afford. The Militant Homosexuals lie, cheat, hurt, bully, attack, bludgeon, lust and lust and lust and lust and lust and lust and lust and lust at everything. They are out of control, it needs to stop.
While we must care about the person within each human being, as some of those who are in these things such as Homosexuality want out, there is nothing in the Bible nor in our nature as Human beings that prevents us from standing up for what is right.
It's not bigoted, to hate what is wrong.
__________________________
On a different topic, don't you think it's weird most people on DA would rather be called a Demon than ever be called an Angel? If they wanted to have the word "Angel" referred to them they would add "Fallen" before the word "Angel", "Fallen Angel", and take long strides to make that point. People are so rebellious, it sickens me.
Yet here in the 21st century, Rachel Andelman felt the need to “identify” as bisexual at age 14 when, in point of fact, Florida law doesn’t even consider 14-year-olds capable of consenting to sex. By the time she was a junior, she came out as a lesbian, already sufficiently fluent in radical feminist jargon to invoke “compulsory heterosexuality” as a force of patriarchal oppression. (When I was a high-school junior, heterosexuality sure as heck wasn’t “compulsory,” or else I’d have been getting some of that action.) Whether or not Rachel Andelman ever could have been heterosexual, had a mad scientist erased her memory and transported her in a time machine to 1976, is one of those interesting questions that must remain forever in the realm of hypothetical speculation. Certainly there were many teenage girls back then who were awkward and confused, but they didn’t have the Internet to tell them what to do about their confusion, whereas Rachel Andelman did “countless hours of research and reading” before arriving at her transgender destination at age 18.
Oh, and what a strange coincidence that her freshman roommate at college was also going through a sexual identity crisis. Except it’s not a coincidence, it’s a trend. Isn’t everybody in college going through a sexual identity crisis nowadays? LGBTQIA — pick a letter! Any letter!
If someone had tried to get us to care about politics when I was a teenager, we’d have called them a “homo,” which was a sort of generalized insult that wasn’t homophobic because the word “homophobia” hadn’t been invented yet. Circa 1974, “homo” (like “queer” and “faggot”) was just an insult slung around among a group of teenage friends, without any actual suspicion of homosexuality. Perhaps a sociology professor or a Gender Studies major would interpret the use of such slang insults as expressions of “toxic masculinity” or whatever, but of course all professors and Gender Studies majors are homos, by the standards of normal teenagers. When I was in high school, all the cool kids were completely cynical about politics and politicians, and considering that I attended high school during the presidencies of Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter, perhaps you can see why were were so cynical.
TheQuartering's NOT mad about the idea of a gay Sonic character, he's mad that you're advocating for changing an established character's sexual orientation for NO good reason, therefore for NO reason.
(By the way, advocating for changing an established character's identity/trivial traits, which means that you're advocating for a pointless change to an established character, makes you come across as an asshole)
Indeed, changing an established character's sexual orientation, or any other identity traits, is SELFISH because they're only picking that character to ride their popularity.
True, especially because making an original character is creative and shows they can make something of their own for the benefit of others, NOT just themselves.
Too bad politicians in the West don’t have the honesty to talk about protecting children from homosexuals. Even though homosexuals make up about 1.5 percent of the US population, studies suggest that they commit close to 33 percent of the child molestation.
Africa has a very serious problem with homosexual and bisexual men spreading AIDS. One source notes “17 million people have died since the AIDS epidemic began in the 1970s, more that 3.3 million of those children. An additional 12 million children have been orphaned by AIDS.” A responsible nation would pass laws to try to control the problem, but our liberal news media acts as though any repression of homosexuality is some great outrage.
The Russian republic under Vladimir Putin has banned homosexuals from trying to brainwash and recruit Russian children into their decadent lifestyle. The Supreme Court of India has recently ruled that homosexuality is illegal and even Red China considers homosexuality an immoral behavior.
The reason that homosexuals are promoted in our society is because the Jews protect them and see them as their allies. Weak-minded liberals, who don’t realize the danger to their children, are brainwashed to tolerate and accept homosexuals. Meanwhile, God clearly condemned homosexuality in Leviticus 18, just in case anyone cares.
RE: "There's more cock in r/actuallesbians than here" says redditor in r/askgaybros
I literally don't consider gay men allies anymore. there are so few standing up to this cult that they've gone full traitor mode on lesbians. Lesbians, who fucking cared for them when they were dropping like flies of "gay plague".
And this is the pay back we get.
I really think that as we re-group as lesbians, we need to make one thing clear: we may have something in common with gay men, but they are not our allies. They are men. They are misogynist scum and they are traitors. Only a very few of them seem to care about us.
Just like only a very few straight men care about what happens to women.
So there you go, they're just men. And we need to keep that in mind going forward and never waste energy helping them again.
We should also distance ourselves from them politically and socially, if at all possible. Again, because they are males and the sexuality can poison everything and be quite perverted. Remember it was gay men who wanted to let pedophiles in the movement in the 70s, and it was lesbians who held the line and said, "uh, no, child raping is not a legit sexuality". If we weren't there, what would become of their civil rights movement?
I say we leave them to cope for themselves and if they eat themselves over gender cult or pedo bullshit, then it's their own fault. We need to stop wasting time and energy babysitting and advocating for men, because what happens is they reap all the rewards and we lose everything.
Everything. We literally don't have a community anymore. Where were gay men when that was happening? They can piss off as far as I'm concerned. We need to really take the Get The L Out movement seriously. Maybe some people will think that's too extreme or we need gay men or something, but I don't think so. Need them for what? They're men, most of them are worthless when it comes to creating anything positive for women.
This month, June, 2017, President Donald Trump’s State and Defense Departments, reaffirmed their support for the LGBT agenda. The White House itself did not, thankfully, but thus far, President Trump has NOT reversed Obama’s Executive Order that still commands the entire executive branch to actively undermine Biblical values on sex and marriage as a international priority.
I love my country, and am deeply grieved that in the area of sexual morality we indeed seem almost to have become, as the Iranians love to chant, the “Great Satan” of the world. When I read Chapters 17 and 18 of the Book of Revelation in my Bible, I cannot help but recognize a parallel between America and “Mystery Babylon,” whether or not they are actually the one and the same. “For all the nations have drunk of the wine of the passion of her immorality, and the kings of the earth have committed acts of immorality with her, and the merchants of the earth have become rich by the wealth of her sensuality” (Rev 18:3).
The pro-LGBTQ Human Rights Campaign (HRC) conducted a survey recently which found that upwards of 92 percent of all members of its community have received at least one injection of a Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine.”
A press release about the HRC Foundation Survey reveals that homosexuals, bisexuals, transgenders, queers and others of this nature are among the most likely demographic to willingly and eagerly roll up their sleeves to get jabbed by the government and Big Pharma.
<...>
LGBTQ Asians and Pacific Islanders are the most compliant at 96 percent, followed by 90 percent of LGBTQ Hispanics. Black LGBTQs clocked in at 85 percent compliance, as did Native American, Alaskan, Middle Eastern and North African LGBTQs.
For some reason, light-skinned LGBTQs (Caucasians) were not even mentioned in this survey category (because white people are bad, according to the Left).
<...>
The only time white LGBTQs are even mentioned at all in the survey is when the HRC makes the claim that non-whites are experiencing far more “covid deaths” among their friends and family members – the suggestion being that covid is “racist” against “people of color.”
<...>
The Covid Blog finds none of this surprising in light of the fact that LGBTQs tend to be among the most aggressive pro-jab zealots in society. Even outside of the covid injection lineup, LGBTQs tend to be heavy promoters of vaccines in general.
“The current LGBTQ crowd as a whole are intolerant of any views contrary to theirs and will aggressively target anyone who expresses those views,” wrote one commenter at The Covid Blog. “Even other gay people.”
“So when you virtue signal and embrace the woke narrative, accept the consequences. The phrase ‘get woke, go broke’ should also include for the vaxxers ‘and suffer from your choices,” which include possibly life-changing injury and death.”
[From "First 2022 post"]
Hello Mr César. First of all, allow me to express my deep gratitude for feeling that my comment from exactly a year ago deeply resonates with you. It is an honour
[…]
I hope this comment grants me access to your select group of SS-like Seers[…]and zealots devoted to the manifestation of our pure and unquenchable desire to watch or at least contribute to the eventual absolute and uncontested domination of the Aryan superman over the entirety of this globe
[…]
A future in which energy consumption from a constantly growing and mentally passive and incompetent population of shitskins (that can barely function in their day to day lives without big state welfare at our expense or grasp rudimentary concepts, much less work) exceedingly supersedes the rate, the percentage and the quantity of the extraction, distribution, availability and affordability of rapidly depleting natural resources, is unsustainable and falls into the realm of childish science-fiction
[…]
Non-Nordic so-called ‘whites’ must accept that they are nothing more than stepping stones for Nordids and failed test subjects in this most intricate experiment called Life that evolution has chosen to discard
[…]
As for homosexuality, Himmler aptly addressed this matter in his speech dissecting this pathology and linking it with the chastity of the Catholic clergy
[…]
Sooner or later, all other hominid subspecies, even those that have common enemies with us or have forged uneasy alliances with whites in the past like Palestinians, Syrians, Iranians and Japanese respectively, are to be sacrificed at the altar of the doctrine of utter exterminationism like you espouse Mr César
[…]
Whites should honour and pay tribute to their heroes and forefathers[…]and strive to surpass them[…]Adolf Hitler was right and if the West refuses to accept this fact it will sooner or later be annihilated