#fundie

God says you have to do everything I tell you to!

Brian Niemeier #fundie brianniemeier.com

Star Wars is dead, the Witches who've co-opted the franchise hate us, and you know my take on supporting such.

That said, one of my mutuals on Twitter recently steered me toward an Orthodox archbishop's review of Return of the Jedi.

This review was written during the movie's original run, soon after His Eminence watched it in the theater. His keen theological explication of what I suspect were George Lucas' accidental spiritual insights gave me a new appreciation of the original trilogy's moral value.

Just as importantly, the Archbishop's glowing assessment of the original trilogy's sublime spiritual lessons drive home exactly how much the Death Cultists at Disney have taken from us. The vandals' evil is directly inverse to the splendor of the beauty they've defaced.

[...]

Time and again we see that the real battle is fought and won on the moral level. It was the irresistible moral force of Luke's self-emptying love that redeemed Anakin. Only by embracing and living such sacrificial love after the model of Christ can we defeat those who hate us for His sake.

The Death Cult knows it, too. That's why they spent billions to mar this iconic trilogy--especially the Christ figure's triumph at the end.

[...]

The Death Cult cannot countenance a redemptive ending like this, because in their twisted cosmology there is no and can be no forgiveness. That is why their imitation of Star Wars was both a clumsy remake of the first trilogy and a cynical hollowing out of it at the same time.

And Star Wars is far from the Cult's only victim. They're sullying and degrading every speck of beauty in Christendom.

But as the Archbishop shows, the minions of the Evil One can be stopped. Doing so will require you, me, and all Christians to deny ourselves, take up our crosses daily, and follow Christ.

Once the great moral victory is won, our temporal enemies will fall like dominoes.

Roosh V #fundie #wingnut returnofkings.com

CONSERVATIVES ARE LOSERS

The following article was originally published on Roosh V.

For the world to get to how it is today, with the nearly complete elimination of tradition in favor of a globohomo world where diddling little children is becoming normalized, conservatives have had to lose every meaningful cultural war in the history of man. When someone declares themselves a conservative, they’re in fact stating that they are a loser, someone who is meant to take the fall when the left comes attacking.

Conservatives have lost on every battlefront: free speech, the military, the universities, marriage, nuclear family, child education, the media, the government, Boy Scouts, business, law and justice, Christianity, patriarchy, immigration, the welfare state, and capitalism. The right to bear arms is the only battle they’re not losing in a rout, but I’m confident they will lose that too within a decade’s time. Conservative institutions are being infiltrated and subverted, or have disappeared off the face of the earth, and there is no sign of them ever coming back.

Why are conservatives such losers? Because they desire to merely hold the line while their enemy rushes at them full speed. They don’t want to conquer new lands, kill their enemy, or inflict real harm. They want to maintain the status quo while the left froths at the mouth to win, energized with momentum and passion. The left is so dissatisfied at the state of the world because of their deep-seated inner dysfunction that they put their entire being into trying to make it better. They don’t know how to enjoy their lives so they have to attack the lives of others.

Conservatives, on the other hand, have no momentum or passion. They just want to be left alone, which makes them easy pickings for a collective that is hellbent on achieving their nightmare utopia. In the end, conservatives are the Spartans in 300 who have trained their entire lives to lose the battle, even if they are pound-for-pound stronger than their enemy.

Conservatives have also shown to be comically susceptible to leftist ideas when it’s presented as “human rights.” Two decades ago, the vast majority of conservatives would have stood against gay marriage, but a few years of cheesy “love is love” commercials was all it took for them to change their mind. Their motto of “live and let live” is only reasonable to hold if their enemy believed the same. They give the crying baby its bottle and from that milk it gets fat and strong and decides to kill the entire family. Conservatives don’t understand that giving an inch to the left eventually results in absolute defeat. They have to psychotically refuse to give any ground, even if practical logic or fairness is staring them in the face, but we know they won’t do that.

Another problem conservatives face is technology, which is not agnostic but rather liberating. It allows man to rely less on traditions, family, social bonds, and religion, all things that the left hates. The more technology you have, the more you can be an atomized unit in a little urbanized box, reliant only on your service job and digital device to keep you alive and somewhat sane while using Uber and Lyft to travel in and out of your self-imposed quarantine zone. Because of technology, the conservatism of today is merely the liberalism of twenty years ago. I challenge you to find a single attractive “conservative” girl who hasn’t tried Tinder or engaged in abundant pre-marital sex. Look at the life of any self-professed conservative and odds are you’ll find a rather cosmopolitan existence that is far removed from nature and rural living.

The biggest reason why conservatives will continue to lose is that they’re still not ready to kill the left even though the left is ready to kill them. Liberals have been getting conservatives fired on a daily basis while suing their businesses out of existence while the conservative loser merely whines about it on Twitter. You may hate the left, but if you wouldn’t dare even punching them in the face because you fear losing your life of comfort, you will lose. If you’re not prepared to kill your enemy while your enemy is busy killing you, you will lose. It’s that simple. Some think that conservatives have to feel a sense of hopelessness to fight back, but by then there will be nothing left worth fighting for.

You don’t have to be a historian to know that conservatives will continue to lose. Simple take a look back 50, 100, or 500 years to see how much ground they’ve lost, and amplify that by a factor of ten thanks to technology if you want to imagine how much ground they will lose in the next 50, 100, or 500 years. They are such losers that if you see any sort of organized conservative “uprising” in the years to come, it will surely be a carefully managed scheme by the elites to usher in yet another monumental conservative defeat, just like we saw in the last few years with the alt right’s astonishing rise and then disastrous defeat in Charlottesville at the hands of their more capable enemies.

Since I know conservatives will not win, I do not identify as one, because I don’t see myself as a loser. I will stay under the radar and live with no label, and let the communists on the left defeat the losers on the right like they have been doing for centuries.

WikiMANNia #fundie #transphobia #sexist #conspiracy at.wikimannia.org

(Submitter’s Note: A few highlights from an incredibly long screed about “Genderism”, a lot of potential quote material is cut)
(Note 2: Site is in German, this is a translation)

Genderism is an ideology developed by feminists and homosexuals that focuses on sociological gender (gender) instead of biological gender (sex) when looking at people. This ideology has significant consequences for the image of man and gender roles. Genderism can be described as racial teaching of the 21st century. However, it is neither scientifically stable nor can it be substantiated with concrete facts.

introduction

The ideology of genderism has so far largely remained without media attention and therefore unknown to the citizen. The - sometimes - Marxist actors know that social change cannot be achieved without changing the language . That is why new terms are needed:

Gender (as a counter-concept to biological gender)
Gender mainstreaming (gender in politics, as a political strategy)
Gender Studies (gender in research, in the academic field)
Gender Budgeting [1] (gender in financial planning, budget law)
Gender Theory [2] (The theory underlying gender ideology)
Queer Theory (A theory developed by gays and lesbians that became part of gender ideology)
Sexual Diversity (gender diversity)
Social engineering (social construction, a social science tool of genderism)
→ Main article : Technical terms of genderism

Pioneers of genderism have been a. the American feminist Andrea Dworkin and her life partner John Stoltenberg . In Germany it was Alice Schwarzer .

[…]

Legitimation

These incomprehensible terms contribute significantly to the fact that a broad discourse on genderism has so far failed to materialize. Most people have not yet understood the content of this ideology behind these terms . This raises the question of legitimizing gender policy.

Genderism is a project that has secretly infiltrated not only our society but also politics in recent years , worldwide, without the people of the individual countries being aware of it at all. Because there has been large-scale media censorship here. It is still taking place. Not even politicians understood the fact that gender (or gender mainstreaming ) is even a political program.

It is about the attempt to equality enforce gender at all levels of society. For the first time the term was in 1984 at the 3rd UN World Conference on Women [ wp ] discussed in Nairobi and later promoted to the 4th World Conference on Women in Beijing. [8] The Amsterdam Treaty [ wp ] made the concept the official goal of the equality policy of the European Union in 1997/1999 . [9]

It is striking that there is no sign of democratic legitimacy . Genderists have established the term gender at international UN conferences and in the EU bureaucracy. With the Amsterdam Treaty, gender ideology became the basis of the equality policy of the European Union, and in Germany gender mainstreaming was installed with an administrative act and has since then decisively determined all levels of politics. [10]

Gender policy was not discussed in parliament, nor was the sovereign, the citizen, questioned. The gender ideology was thus installed undemocratically past the citizen. Politicians therefore expect citizens to accept gender ideology like a religion that has fallen from the sky .

[…]

Following the change in divorce law in 1977 , the introduction of gender mainstreaming is the second serious, illegal act in Germany in relation to the family.

Terms

The content of gender ideology is hidden behind a cloud of Anglicist [ wp ] terms that no one understands and that are not translated. The difficulty in understanding lies not only in the language , the so-called gender talk , but also in a rather cloudy ideology , in which little is clear apart from the claim that people would only convince themselves of "being a man" and "being a woman", the sexes have no biological causes and the gender roles are attracted to society (in gender terms: "constructed").

Attempting to clarify the rather vague terms in a vague ideology is already part of a criticism because the necessary determinations can hardly be made neutrally.

Quote: «The paradox of gender ideology is that on the one hand - in theory - it is disputed that there are rigid genders, and on the other hand - in political practice - all efforts of gender politics amount to privileging women based on their biological gender: support programs only for women, preference for women when recruiting, quota for women etc. »
The terms are sometimes used interchangeably because the speakers are not clear about the meaning of the terms themselves. In the following, the resulting Babylonian language confusion is to be resolved by assigning clear concepts of genderism to the terms. But the reader should know that the terms are used differently, then the listener has to guess from the context what the speaker actually means.

Gender Mainstreaming
[…]

Gender mainstreaming includes the obligation for all political and administrative systems to check their own programs, decisions and regulations to determine whether they are indirectly discriminating against a gender. Gender mainstreaming is a political concept with which gender-based disadvantages can be systematically identified in professional work.

[…]
Gender Studies

Gender Studies is a pseudoscience at universities - comparable to Scientific Socialism [ wp ] - and can be translated as "gender-compliant gender studies". The core business of gender studies is essentially the analytical deconstruction of gender. It is not the genes or any other biological essence that explains the gender of humans, but only social categories. Whoever is treated and treated as a man is a man; whoever is treated as a woman is a woman. A very crucial place where this gendering (" Doing Gender") takes place, is raising children in the family and other social institutions. [13]

Note: "Gender Studies is a gender science based on gender ideology."
Note: "In contrast to gender mainstreaming, gender studies is the academic program."

Wilfred Owen #fundie returnofkings.com

WHY IN YOUR OWN LIFE YOU SHOULD BE VERY OFFENSIVE
…
Wilfred Owen
Notices the lies told to this generation and writes about them.
…
The proper response to political correctness could be to go on living life as you see fit. Another option is to cave in, as many in this era do. “Go along to get along,” may simply appear as a necessary expedient when you are told to “pick your battles.”

That may seem innocuous, but the vile act of giving in to what is wrong is at the very heart of the figurative, accurate, and effective pejorative “cuckservative.” If you are a man, you don’t let your vital boundaries get crossed because when you do, you show the world that nothing is sacred to you. In the smallest of behaviors you show the world that when it comes down to it, even your wife is not sacred to you.

In this era, where free speech is aggressively under attack, the superior response to society attempting to silence others is to draw a line that is far beyond legitimate speech that affects you. There are plenty of opportunities in life where you draw a boundary so far from anywhere that matters.

The Mailman Doesn’t Enter the House, Ever

Your mailman or UPS guy drops off packages at the door. Not inside the door. It’s just an extra two feet, it’s not like he’s sitting down at your dinner table or climbing into bed, so what’s the difference? You set that wide boundary at the threshold of your home, no matter how heavy a package is.

You don’t want this guy in your private space because before you know it, this stranger may easily push the boundary a little farther and a little farther. One way to make sure that the mailman is never in bed with your wife is to make sure the mailman is never in the house. The door is the boundary of the home. The home is private. The government worker and the stranger alike are not invited into the home.

[…]
A Smart Man Doesn’t Depend On The Next Paycheck, Ever

You don’t need many years worth of savings and investments to live comfortably. As long as you have marketable skills, you could exist fine with very little saved. But it sure feels good to have a giant buffer protecting you from direly being in need of that next paycheck. One way to make sure you never live paycheck to paycheck is to make sure that you are many paychecks away from that horribly low bar.

The Free Speech Buffer

Free speech should be another boundary where we draw a large buffer.

[Blackface-like drawing of Serena Williams stomping angrily on her tennis racket while a referee asks the other player to let her win.]
[Caption: SERENA WILLIAMS CARICATURES MUST BE PROTECTED]

Because we didn’t successfully protect the rights of the deplorable to draw Muhammad caricatures, we are now fighting over whether any caricature artist will ever again be allowed to caricature any black woman.

How long before all cartoons of anyone on the left becomes forbidden? Before cartoons of any beloved figure adored by many becomes forbidden? Push back. Not only is Serena Williams allowed to be caricatured, so is Muhammad. In fact, the world is better off if artists caricature the two bullies being badly behaved together.

CHALLENGING THE OFFICIAL, THOUGHTLESS NARRATIVE ON THE HOLOCAUST MUST BE PROTECTED

If you don’t fight for that academic freedom, then you end up with a campus environment where even the well-evidenced and relatively tame Charles Murray can’t take a stage in a college. When you stand up for the most out in right field intellectual rigor, you stand up for the concept of intellectual rigor.

It brings greater truth, reason, and honesty. Those all make for a better world. Inviting intellectually rigorous debate makes the world a better place. Yes, that also means inviting intellectually rigorous debate on the Holocaust makes the world a better place.

[…]
“Deplatforming” and “Hate Crime” Push The Overton Window

Deplatforming is a legitimate behavior on the left. It’s currently being celebrated throughout the left as a victory against extremism.

The term “hate speech” is a legitimate distinction on the left. It’s merely an attempt to silence. To overpower a person with an opinion. There is no hate speech. There is only speech.

These are never legitimate distinctions between how you can interact with what adults. There is no hate speech, there are no hate crimes, there are no protected classes of adults. That must be the perspective. True to first principles: a human is a human.

Everyone who comes to an intellectual debate must be ready to take off the gloves and to get deep into the truth of the matter being discussed. In a debate, no one is free to be protected from the truths that arise in an intellectual debate no matter how offended they feel, not even if they cry or throw a tantrum. Laugh at them if they do, for they should be very embarrassed.

Marxist Wars On Freedom Are The True Hate Crime

The true hate crime is the promotion of neo-Marxism by social justice warriors. They seek to win debates by pulling apart the freedoms that the freedom fighters of the West, our intellectual forebearers have struggled for centuries to introduce to humanity.

Marxism turns good cultures into legalistic petty cultures that tend to behave culturewide in adulthood as if they’ve gone through an abusive upbringing. Marxism turns relative paradises on this planet into places of abject squalor. These are hate crimes.

Interestingly, the neo-Marxist social justice warriors overlook this fact and prefer to point to your hurtful words as the real hate crime. Don’t let them. They are the domestic terrorists who would repeat the failed Marxist experiment on this wonderful land.

Be A Free Speech Warrior
I request of you that as you go through life, you take the temperature of the place you are in and always seek to push the boundaries. To do so is alpha and feels good. Sometimes you fail, more often you succeed.

Just like pushing boundaries with a woman and weathering shit tests earns you rewards, pushing the free speech boundaries and passing the shit tests of those who would silence you will earn you rewards.

MAKE THE QUIP THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED OVER THE LINE.
Cross the line. Do it fearlessly. Do it boldly.

USE THE WORDS THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED OVER THE LINE.
You know what they are. Use them. All the words that you are told you can’t use. Use them. Use them with skill, for maximum effect. But use them. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

SHARE THE OPINION THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED OVER THE LINE.
The best researched most effective thing you know how to present, present it. Present it in a way that no one can dispute it. If you’re not great at anything, present what you’re best at. Do it enough and you’ll get good at it.

Santiago Gomez #fundie #wingnut #crackpot amazon.com

President Donald J. Trump: God Jehovah's Chosen Vessel

Description

Ex 3:14
14 And God said to Moses (Donald J. Trump), "I AM WHO I AM." And He said, "Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, (the United States of America) 'I AM has sent me to you.'" NKJV

About the Author


Santiago's most cherished desire is to be a catalyst to ignite a worldwide end time revival and to go into as many countries as the Lord permits to conduct pastor's conferences and to write a sequel to this treatise as the Lord continues to reveal His desire to up-lift (rapture) us from this present fallen, evil world. This is his passion and why the Lord sent him back to earth from a near-death experience when He said to him "go back to your wife and children." His wife being the church and his children being the children of God he has written this message to. This is the only reason he still exists in this present fallen world, his true and only purpose in life. He is fully expecting that he, as many of us, will soon hear the words spoken by our Heavenly Father, God: "Well done, good and faithful servant."

Some Pakistani construction workers #fundie indiatoday.in

An ancient Buddha statue, which was found in Pakistan's Takht Bahi area in Mardan district in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa while digging the foundation of a house, was vandalised by local construction workers on Saturday as they considered the relic to be "unIslamic".

Workers who were digging the foundation of a house discovered the ancient relic said to be from the Gandhara civilisation. Calling the idol “unIslamic”, the men smashed the statue into pieces.

A video of the incident that has gone viral on social media shows the construction workers destroying the idol using a sledgehammer and expressing their resentment towards it.

Abdul Samad, director, Archaeology and Museums in KPK said, “We have located the area and we will have those involved arrested soon.”

Pakistani media has reported that four people involved in vandalising the statue have been arrested.

Barbara Aho #fundie #wingnut #conspiracy watch-unto-prayer.org

The following pages are selected portions of a longer report on this website, The False Gospel in the Stars, which is an expose of the astrological signs that will be used by false teachers to validate the credentials of the Antichrist and False Prophet. Many of the current projections concerning the identities of these personages are in fact disinformation calculated to deceive the masses. Adding to the general ignorance, there is little information coming forth in the way of exposure of the Merovingian dynasty as the Satanic bloodline from which the Antichrist and False Prophet will come. Whatever lipservice is paid to this subject is usually tainted with enough misinformation to keep the masses of Christians ignorant of the truth.

Yet the Bible presents specific evidence concerning the identities of the Antichrist and False Prophet, the Mark of the Beast, Mystery Babylon the Great and other entities that will be imperative for God’s elect to recognize during the Tribulation Period. We believe that New Agers already know the identity of the False Christ, the False Prophet and various other Tribulation counterfeits through their study of astrology, as interpreted by a large body of occult tradition and the current propaganda proliferating through New Age publications. There is no reason that Christians, given the same information available to New Agers, and aided by a right understanding of Scripture, cannot discern and rightly interpret this end-time enigma. The alternative is to be at the mercy of a massive disinformation campaign that is being conducted within the Christian community by the same New Age network which is planning the destruction of Christianity and return of mankind to the paganism of the ancient world.

Lisa Renee #crackpot #moonbat #magick #fundie energeticsynthesis.com

From within your 12D Shield, create the Hub Handshake with the Unity Vow:

Defenders of Truth, Sovereignty and Liberation. Guardian Families, serving the One.

From across all the Multiverses I call upon my Guardian families to join me now. My unification is demonstrated in the waves of Omni Love - I sound my heart tone to you now. My energy template updated, renewed and forever perpetuated in the Eternally Sustained Light. My Alchemical Container is consecrated and dedicated to the Purposes of One, and I endeavor to be the Knower of God to then be the Way Shower of God. Please sustain me in the Eternal Power of my Consecration.

I have asked for your Gatekeeping in order to hold my mission, my highest purpose in Service to the One Light, my Source, the Living Light Code. My Intention is Unification - the Cosmic Christ Principle - as an Energetic Reality, here and now.

I request the handshake to fortify my spiritual links through the Universal Cosmic Triad, and into the Core of One, the Zero Point God Matrix, that which is the source of my Genesis. With deep reverence for all of Life, Dear God, Breathe your Life Codes into my created form. I set my intention now to be remembered to that which I AM, fully, completely and totally.

I state my mutual purpose as One, please resurrect all inorganic patterns to the Organic Living Light now. And to that I say, Thank God I AM the Living Eternal Light. And so it is lovingly decreed.

Linda Harvey #fundie #wingnut #racist #sexist #homophobia missionamerica.com

Black Lives Matter is a movement based on snot-nosed dismissal of American opportunity, history, affluence, and morality. Not only is the group financially connected to Susan Rosenberg, a domestic terrorist convicted in 1984 for bombing campaigns, but the women founders of BLM exhibit other serious emotional and intellectual deficits as they negatively mischaracterize almost everything in their path—men, the nuclear family, police, American heritage, capitalism, unborn babies, Western civilization, sexuality, Jews, and their white human brothers and sisters.

Oh, and they just happen to be black. But it’s the brat in them and in Colin that most people find objectionable. It has nothing to do with color. For these race-obsessed opportunists, darker skin color provides cover for a deeply destructive ideology.

People are now getting fired from jobs just for social media posts or reckless speech. Yet Washington Post has not fired opinion editor, Karen Attiah, who actually tweeted about “white women” being lucky that black people aren’t “calling for revenge.”

Is it too much to expect these people to grow up, stop whining, cut the threats, and cease their campaigns of destruction?

No one looking through an accurate lens of American history can claim with a straight face that there is more tyranny today, more oppression, fewer opportunities than in the past. The trajectory has been exactly the opposite.

These are infantile fantasies. And ironically, race is actually not the driver here. It’s adolescent rebellion.
<...>

I praise God for people who are in a unique position to speak the truth right now—Candace Owens, Ben Carson, Bob Woodson, Larry Elder and others.

The fact remains that this country is a beautiful beacon of hope in a bleak world. For the immature hearts incapable of recognizing this, there is a solution. They can grow up or get out.

Let’s pray for the former.

Linda Harvey #fundie #wingnut #racist missionamerica.com

We have a choice. We can turn away from the childish mob. We can prosecute the lawbreakers while ignoring their press agent bullies-- the Colin Kaepernicks, AOCs, Stacey Abrams, and LeBron Jameses of America.

Christians especially must resist manipulation. Because it’s obvious that, to these radicals, only certain black lives “matter.” Certainly not the teens killed in the Seattle CHOP/CHAZ, nor the epidemic of black on black murders (including children), nor the abortions of black babies. Nor Christian blacks in Nigeria, where genocide continues virtually unreported by the American media or decried by Western church leaders.
<...>
America's current dilemma is not because of white privilege, or even black privilege. Our nation is being ruled by brat privilege, where adults who once had sense are yielding to the demands of the immature and the unwise, the reckless, the pathological.

Yet the agitators forget—God is watching.

Remember the rebellion of Korah in the wilderness (Numbers 16)? A group of malcontents defied the leadership of Moses and Aaron, forgetting the Hebrews’ dramatic rescue from Egyptian slavery, the miraculous Red Sea crossing, and God’s provision of manna in the wilderness. More and more people joined Korah and his upstart buddies.

It did not end well for them. God was not endlessly patient, letting them vent, being sensitive to their wokeness. God’s wrath descended on these rebels, and about 15,000 people were consumed by fire, swallowed into a pit or killed in a plague.

The Lord desires an appreciative heart. When God’s will to protect and bless people is subverted, the consequences can be dire.

Bro. Michael Dimond and Bro. Peter Dimond #fundie #conspiracy mostholyfamilymonastery.com

[From "“Saint” Paul VI (manifest heretic who claimed to be Pope from 1963-1978)"]

Paul VI was the man who claimed to be the head of the Catholic Church from June 21, 1963 to August 6, 1978. He was the man who promulgated the Second Vatican Council and the New Mass. We’ve already seen that the evidence indicates that the man who preceded and elevated Paul VI, John XXIII, was a Freemason and a manifest heretic. We’ve also seen that the documents of Vatican II contain many heresies, and that the New Mass, which Paul VI eventually promulgated, represented a liturgical revolution.

Paul VI solemnly ratified all 16 documents of Vatican II. It is not possible for a true pope of the Catholic Church to solemnly ratify teachings that are heretical. As we will show in more detail later in this book, the fact that Paul VI did solemnly ratify the heretical teachings of Vatican II proves that Paul VI was not a true pope, but an antipope.

It’s important to keep in mind that Paul VI was the one who gave the world the New Mass, the other new “sacraments,” and the heretical teachings of Vatican II. If you go to the New Mass or embrace the teachings of Vatican II, the confidence that you have that these things are legitimate is directly connected to the confidence that you have that Paul VI was a true Catholic pope.

We will now expose the amazing heresies of Paul VI. We will show, from his official speeches and writings, that Paul VI was a complete apostate who was not even remotely Catholic. All of the official speeches and writings of the men who claim to be pope are contained in the Vatican’s weekly newspaper, L’ Osservatore Romano.

[...]

Paul VI, General Audience, Dec. 6, 1972: “Does God exist? Who is God? And what knowledge can man have of him? What relationship must each of us have with him? To answer each of these questions would lead us to endless and complex discussions…”[2]

These questions don’t lead us to endless and complex discussions. Does God exist? Yes. Who is God? The Holy Trinity. What knowledge can man have of him? The Catholic Faith. What relationship must each of us have with him? To belong to the Church He established. Paul VI is stating that these are endless and complex questions. No Catholic would assert such nonsense, which mocks and renders meaningless the Catholic Faith and the true God.

[...]

The Catholic Church teaches that all non-Catholic religions are false. There is only one true Church, outside of which no one can be saved. This is Catholic dogma.

[...]

Hindus are pagans and idolaters who worship many different false gods. For Paul VI to praise the notorious Hindu Gandhi as “ever-conscious of God’s presence” shows again that Paul VI was a complete religious indifferentist. Paul VI also officially praised the false religion of Hinduism in the official Vatican II document Nostra Aetate #2 (on non-Christian religions), as we quoted in the section on Vatican II.

[...]

Buddhism is a false, pagan religion of the East which teaches belief in re-incarnation and karma. Buddhists hold that life is not worth living, and that every form of conscious existence is an evil. Buddhists worship various false gods. Buddhism is an idolatrous and false religion of the Devil. [...] According to Paul VI, the false, pagan and idolatrous religion of Buddhism is one of the “riches” of Asia!

[...]

Islam is a false religion which denies the Divinity of Christ and rejects the Most Holy Trinity. Besides rejecting the true God, Islam allows polygamy up to four wives, and its followers (Muslims) spread this false religion with a zeal unequalled by the others. Islam is the most viciously anti-Christian major false religion in the world. To convert to Christianity in many Islamic countries means death. The propagation of the true Faith is strictly prohibited by the Muslims. Islamic society is one of the most evil things in human history. [...] Paul VI speaks about the “riches” of the Islamic Faith, a “Faith” that rejects Jesus Christ and the Trinity. He says this “Faith” binds us to the One God. This is apostasy.

[...]

This is completely false and heretical. The Catholic Church has affirmed during her long history, at the cost of oppression and persecution, that the religion of Jesus Christ is the only one that is true; and that Christ is truly God and truly man. Paul VI would have us believe, however, that the martyrs were tortured horribly, not for their profession of faith in Christ, but in order for all to have freedom to profess their various false religions! This is an astoundingly heretical distortion of the truth!

[...]

Here we see Paul VI giving a clear Masonic handshake to the Eastern Schismatic Patriarch of Constantinople, Athenagoras, on Jan. 5, 1964. The two also mutually lifted the reciprocal excommunications of 1054. Translation: this means that Paul VI considered that the Eastern “Orthodox” are no longer excommunicated even though they deny the Papacy. Therefore, according to him, the Papacy is not a dogma binding under pain of excommunication.

[...]

This is all one really needs to see to know that Paul VI was a schismatic and not a Catholic. He makes a Joint Declaration with a schismatic “pope.” He acknowledges this schismatic as the holder of the See of St. Mark. This is a blasphemy against the Papacy, since this schismatic holds no authority whatsoever. He rejects all forms of proselytism – that is, trying to convert the schismatics – and he says “let it cease where it may exist”! Paul VI was a formal heretic and schismatic.

[...]

Here Paul VI reveals that the Vatican II agenda with regard to Protestant sects has gone from polemical opposition – in other words, an opposition to their false doctrines – to an attitude of acceptance of, and mutual respect for, their false religion.

[...]

Paul VI says in Humanae Vitae that couples are perfectly free to have zero children if they want to.

The United Nations is an evil organization that promotes contraception and abortion, and looks to take control of the decision-making for every country on the planet. Former UN Secretary General U Thant praised the Communist Lenin as a man whose “ideals were reflected in the United Nations Charter.” [...] First, Paul VI says that the U.N. is the path that has to be taken. He says that the U.N., not the Catholic Church, is the best means for the cause of justice and peace for the world. Second, he says that the U.N. is the universal (that is, Catholic) body for mankind! He is replacing the Church with the UN.

[...]

On November 13, 1964, Paul VI gave away the triple-crowned papal tiara. Paul VI had the tiara auctioned at the New York World’s Fair.[106] The Papal Tiara is a sign of a true Pope’s authority – the three crowns representing the dogmatic, liturgical and disciplinary authority of a pope. By giving it away, Paul VI was symbolically giving away the authority of the Papacy (although he had none to give away since he was actually an antipope). But it was a symbolic act of how he was a satanic infiltrator whose whole mission was to attempt to destroy the Catholic Church. (Also notice “Cardinal” Ottaviani, whom many falsely think was a true conservative, standing right next to Antipope Paul VI as he does this).

[...]

Notice the twelve stones which represent the twelve tribes of Israel. Not only is this the breast-plate of a Jewish High-Priest, but according to the Encyclopedia of Freemasonry by Mackey, the ephod is also “worn in the (Masonic) American Chapters of the Royal Arch, by the High-Priest as an official part of his official ornaments.” The ephod was the vestment that was worn by Caiphas, the High-Priest of the Jewish religion, who ordered Our Lord Jesus Christ to be put to death by crucifixion.

Antipope Paul VI wore the breast-plate of the Ephod, a.k.a. the Rational of Judgment of the High-Priest, numerous times. God allows things such as this to come out to show the people that these men are infiltrators and enemies of the Catholic Church.

[...]

Within two years of the close of Vatican II, Paul VI removed the index of forbidden books, a decision one commentator rightly called “incomprehensible.”

[...]

Paul VI then abolished the oath against Modernism, at a time when Modernism was flourishing as never before. On Nov. 21, 1970,[107] Paul VI also excluded all cardinals over 80 years of age from participating in papal elections. Paul VI disestablished the papal court, disbanded the Noble Guard and the Palatine Guards.[108] Paul VI abolished the rite of Tonsure, all four Minor Orders, and the rank of Subdiaconate.[109]

[...]

Here is a picture of Antipope Paul VI’s signature. If you turn it upside-down, you see that there are three clear 6’s. The shot below is a close-up of his name turned upside-down. The three 6’s are clear. As far as we know, this is the way that Paul VI’s signature always appeared.

Shizuru-Minamino #homophobia #fundie deviantart.com

image
The Holy Bible makes this quite clear. The Bible is the law and the written Word of God, himself. It doesn't matter if something that is sinful is made legal. What is sin is the product of the Devil. God made us man and woman, for one man and one woman to marry and bear children. That's what we are intended to be.

The people who created the U.S, were Christians, following the Word of God. They used the Ten Commandments to create our laws and constitutional amendments. Our country was created with the love of Jesus in mind. He wants all of us to follow his Father's plans. There is no lie about this and it's not something ancient, because the Bible is never ancient. It never has set dates in history. It's written like the events in it are always present.

There's a man in prison for 15 years in Iowa for burning the Rainbow Flag that was posted outside of his church. He did the righteous thing, because the Rainbow Flag is really a symbol of lust. It's not love. It's not a Christian flag. Real love is about loving everyone, but also it's about a husband and a wife loving each other. What this man burned was a flag symbolizing lust. And Satan enjoys confusing people under this flag by saying it's love. He claims being gay and lesbian is the way to be. That we must accept LBGTQ for the new way. This is what Satan wants to trap us with.

But, LBGTQ is never the new way. It's just a way to sway people to the realms of Hell after death. The man that was sent to prison, will be receiving judgement from God, the real judge of this world. He'll have his place in Heaven for burning a symbol of lust that was forced upon the House of God. The real path to Heaven, is to stay with God's plans. Swallow your gay/lesbian pride and be straight. One husband and one wife creates children. One man and one woman creates a home for the presence of God to be made welcome. And one man and one woman at the time of death creates less to no sin that needs to be pardoned, in order to enter God's kingdom. You can't have anything sinful to hang off you. Being gay/lesbian is one of those sins. Claiming it as love is another. And saying, "but my country says it's okay" doesn't make it any less sinful. All that says to Him is "that country needs to be gotten rid of, if it's forcing my children to obey sin instead of me".

Brian Niemeier #fundie brianniemeier.com

[Florida man arrested for driving into a church and setting it on fire]

It's possible that the perpetrator may just be suffering from schizophrenia exacerbated by anti-Christian hysteria. It's also impossible to discern over the internet whether or not he's demonically possessed. However, the two conditions aren't mutually exclusive.

Considering that he attacked a parish affiliated with FSSP--a priestly confraternity dedicated to celebrating the Latin Mass--ruling out demonic involvement seems imprudent.

As people convert en masse to a hostile heretical cult while many clergy preach worldly doctrines directly at odds with perennial Magisterial teaching, Satan will only redouble his attacks on Christ's flock.

Andrew Anglin #fundie #wingnut #psycho dailystormer.name

[From "Christian Soldier Brenton Tarrant Who Cleansed Christchurch of Moslems to Represent Himself in Court"]

God is the only witness he needs, for he did what he did in defense of Christian civilization.

Killing people who invaded your homeland for the purpose of transforming your society and destroying your ancestral heritage is not “murder.”

The Guardian

The Australian man who pleaded guilty to killing 51 Muslims in a terrorist attack in Christchurch in March 2019 has chosen to represent himself at his sentencing next month.

Brenton Tarrant pleaded guilty in March to 51 counts of murder, 40 of attempted murder and a terrorism charge after dozens of worshippers were gunned down at two mosques in New Zealand last year.
[...]

Well, he has a right to grandstand.

He was a person who stood up and defended Christianity from our ancient enemies, who are now openly preparing to desecrate one of our holiest places in Constantinople, as they always desecrate everything they conquer.

We may pretend that this conflict between the Moslems is somehow over, because we developed secular humanism, but the Moslems do not believe it is over, and when they move to our lands, they do so with the intention to conquer and subdue us.

Brenton understood that. Soon, all formerly Christian whites will understand it, just the same, when the blood begins to flow in the streets.

History will remember Brenton Tarrant as the precise opposite of what he is being portrayed as now.

History will make him a Saint.

Lincoln #fundie forensicfilesnow.com

(regarding the case of Brian Vaughn, a teenager who murdered his father because he wouldn't buy him a new car)

This is a child that fell for the tricks/wiles of the devil (Ephesians Chapter 6 verses 10-17). This child was into the materialistic things in life; used car cramping his style so he wants a new car. Some would say this is a blessing from God to prevent him for engaging in a worst fate. If that is the case, then glory to The Most High God ✝️✝️✝️ He was released from prison in 2017 and I believe he was 35 at that time.

Darkness is Falling #fundie #conspiracy #wingnut darknessisfalling.com

The "NEW AGE" is just the return of the Babylonian Roman "DARK AGE" orchestrated by the Jesuit Military Order Of Rome! Make no mistake about it! There is NOTHING "New" about it! All its teachings are occult and originate in ancient Babylon. Pantheistic belief is at the core of these demon originated doctrines which teach the "deification" of man.

For nearly 1000 years Rome held absolute temporal and spiritual power over humanity. Men lived in fear and were slaves to the Papal world dictator ANTI-CHRIST! The Jesuits are deceiving the world again with the false promise of "freedom" through "oneness" both politically and spiritually.

​The mantra pushed today by agents of Rome is "CO-EXIST" and ECUMENISM! Unity and a false "Golden Age" are being promised but it is simply slavery in a different form; a return to the tyranny of Nimrod's ancient autocratic kingdom of BA-BEL ruled by the final Papal antichrist!
​
Reader BEWARE!
​
Learn about the Jesuit's Neo Pagan, New Age agenda, (UN Agenda 30) which was birthed in the 19th century occult revival through Theosophy. The core beliefs enshrined in the New Age movement are the idea of an "enlightened" teacher or guru which is to appear and lead humanity into a "Golden Age" of man. Man is to be deified and realize all the hopes of humanity for "peace" "love" and "unity" of a brotherhood of man "without" God! This system will be very short lived because Jesus Christ will return and destroy the anti-christ and bring his evil empire to an end!

PetuniaProudlock #fundie #racist postimg.cc

[on /r/Judaism]

I consider myself Jewish above everything else. Ethnically and religiously.

Agree with everyone in this thread. I have always been taught to value any Yehudim above any Goyim. We are a tribe, and a tribe helps their people - even if it comes at the expense of others. I would always raise up another Jew at any opportunity, protect them even if they did wrong…and I’m glad everyone here feels the same.

[on /r/NBA]

Makes it more interesting to have a player we can all unite to ‘hate.’ Crazy temper, rich white boy, punchable face, really white mannerisms and way of speaking, arrogant. I’m literally white and I can’t stand him so I can’t imagine what it’s like for black people watching him. You could imagine what his ancestors were like.

[On a thread titled “Why is it encouraged for us to spread division between White and Black people”]

As Rabbi Bronstein says, “if the cat and dog are hating each other, the mouse is safe.” Unlike others who do, I would never lie, but it’s not immoral to highlight the failings of other groups. If that leads to division, well, like Rabbi Bronstein says, we’re the mouse. It keeps us safe.


Why are you trying to spread division? Why are you claiming to be white [on /r/NBA], but on other posts saying you’re not? Why are you trying to encourage black people to think of a college kids ancestors as slave owners, and citing his ‘white mannerisms’ as an issue worthy of hate?

Why are YOU spreading anti-Semitism?

Quoting your own posts and asking you 3 civil questions isn’t anti-semitic.

My posts in other threads are irrelevant. This was a post about a g-ddamn basketball player. This is textbook Anti-Semitism.

Bruno Buscaroli #fundie #homophobia #sexist #racist #wingnut returnofkings.com

TODAY’S CONSERVATIVE HAS BECOME YESTERDAY’S LIBERAL
…
Bruno is a young man who used to dismiss red pillers as alarmists. Then he spent a semester in a college campus and became one himself. Now he educates himself through the internet and a library card.
…
With Donald Trump as president of the United States, it would seem as though traditional beliefs are making a comeback in the West. However, one only needs talk to the average ‘’conservative’’ for a while to realize they’re not as conservative as they think they are. Rather, they’ve accepted and integrated many leftist beliefs into their own worldview. They’ve become nothing more than yesterday’s liberals, and now defend ideas against which their predecessors used to fight. Let’s briefly look at a few examples:

Homosexuality
[Picture of Trump Holding the LGBTQ+ Rainbow Flag]
[caption: He’s cool with them]
The very idea of homosexuality used to be socially abhorrent during the early 20th century in the West. If you look at conservative politicians now, however, you’ll find they’re pretty okay with having gays around. We’ve reached a point where modern Western culture has become universally acceptant of homosexuals.

Donald Trump, for instance, ensured he’d do everything in his power to protect LGBTQ citizens from hateful ideologies (might have earned him more voters, but you get the point). Even allowing gays to get married is accepted among conservatives nowadays, and suggesting that it might be a bad idea gets you funny looks at best.

Women in the workplace
[Picture of Women in suits working at a computer]

Encouraging women to study and pursue long term careers damages the family structure by discouraging traditional gender roles. If women are busy working, they can’t focus on being good wives and mothers. Not only that, but it may even cause them to forgo marriage and kids completely.

Despite this, you’ll find almost no one on the mainstream right suggesting women should focus on the home. They believe that doing so would ‘’invite misogyny and sexism’’ or get them compared to ‘’crazy far righters’’. Denial of biological truths does society no favors. The longer the average citizen believes men and women to have the same roles in a family, the more damage will be done.

Sexual marketplace
[Picture of a Half-Naked Man kissing a Half-Naked Woman’s back]

Regulation of the sexual marketplace in the form of marriage and female chastity has long been central to the formation of healthy families in western societies. Without a strong and stable family unit, maintaining civilization becomes impossible. Since promiscuity is the opposite of chastity and monogamy, it naturally runs against family stability.

Characters like James Bond are looked up to as symbols of masculinity and role models for traditional men. While men should aspire to emulate his strong nature and character, emulating his love of casual sex is damaging to society in the long run. Sure, quick and easy sex can be real fun, but let’s not forget sexual liberation is inherently leftist and has done nothing but damage civilization.

Denying the importance of race
[Picture of an Anti-racist Protest]

Often seen as the most taboo of subjects, race gets ignored as much as possible by the mainstream right wing. Science tells us that human ethnic groups have genetic differences, ranging from physical strength to IQ levels. But to even speak about those differences in public is to invite an endless parade of comparisons to Hitler, so conservatives dodge the issue.

Instead, they often preach about civic nationalism, the idea of a nation being more based on its identity than it’s ethnicity. They say that as long as immigrants accept American values of Democracy and hard work, their ethnicity doesn’t matter. Sounds nice in theory, but a nation can’t survive once it’s demographic has been replaced.

You can’t win by defending alone
Conservatives nowadays don’t seem to know what it is they’re conserving. Their claims of standing for a traditional society feel empty when they also advocate for gender and marriage equality. As the culture war against leftists progressed, they slowly lost ground on almost every front. And as their image became demonized by the media, they conceded even further to try and appeal a bit more to the masses. After all, if the general public is okay with two men marrying, it’d make them the bad guys to say there’s something wrong with that.

Fear of being stigmatized makes them unable to push back, so they inevitably become weaker as time goes on. Even worse, the children of conservatives who were born into a watered down version of it don’t even realize it. A cycle forms then, in which the next generation is always more liberal than the next.

Mainstream Conservatives cannot reverse civilization’s decay, only delay it. Movements like Neo-Masculinity, the Alt Right and Alt Christianity lack the presence and member count of Conservatives, but are all better alternatives. Unlike the mainstream right, the dissident right isn’t afraid to push back against leftist narrative. One cannot win by defending alone. No matter how strong a castle’s walls, the stones that form it will crumble if it’s attackers aren’t stopped.

Conservatives are already thinking in the right direction, but haven’t fully taken the red pill. If the West is to survive, it’s imperative that we help these people fully wake up. They’re halfway there already, so hopefully they just need a few more nudges.

Arson Greyer #fundie #sexist #homophobia #biphobia returnofkings.com

AN IDIOT’S GUIDE TO NEW WESTERN SEXUAL ORIENTATIONS
…
Arson Greyer
Arson is an anti-SJW crusader and critic of sexual marketplace deregulation who has gotten filthy rich from the non-existent gender pay gap. He enjoys spending as much time as possible outside of America in places where short-haired women are viewed as social outcasts rather than strong and independent.
…
Up until a couple of years ago, my basic understanding of human sexuality was roughly as follows: there are men, and there are women. A person’s sexual orientation could be defined as one of heterosexual (being sexually attracted to the opposite gender), homosexual (being sexually attracted to others of the same gender) or bisexual (being sexually attracted to both genders).

Recently, however, I’ve been coming across a plethora of new terms in mainstream cultural commentary that purportedly seek to describe other sexual orientations. I quickly found myself coming across such terms as “pan,” “demi,” and even “homoflexible,” wondering what the hell they all mean.

Even the dating app OKCupid has recently broadened the options on gender and sexuality its users can display in their profiles. What was LGBT has now expanded even further, with seemingly new sexual orientations materializing out of thin air on the regular. I’ve written the following “Idiot’s Guide” to help my fellow men avoid the same confusion I’ve suffered in making sense of this new alphabet soup of sexual orientations.

But first, a disclaimer:

You’ll notice that I’ve titled the article as a guide to new “western” sexual orientations. That’s because one would be incredibly hard pressed to find terms like “asexual” or “sapiosexual” being used in any non-western context. In fact, I can’t recall ever even seeing one instance of a woman on a Russian, Ukrainian, Asian or Latin American dating site ever mentioning she identified with one of these new-age, alternate sexual orientations.

Interestingly, the usage of these new sexual orientation terms seems to be primarily restricted to the discourse of two basic areas of the internet:

1. Articles by SJWs and feminists on known manosphere-hating sites (e.g. Jezebel).

2. The social media and dating profiles of young middle and upper-middle class white women.

The definitions and examples I’ll provide below are more relevant to understanding these terms as used in area “b,” but nonetheless will provide clarity in other contexts also. Okay, let’s begin:

1. Pansexual
Definition: sexual attraction to all sexes and gender identities.

Famous Alleged Pansexuals: Madonna, Lady Gaga.

More Accurate Description: Bisexual. Proponents of pansexuality claim that it differs from bisexuality in that it is gender blind, so allegedly pansexuals wouldn’t know a cock from a vagina if it slapped them in the face. The queer “movement,” however, claims both pansexuality and bisexuality can mean attraction to not just the male and female gender, but any gender (whatever those others are). So, they’re essentially the same.

…
4. Demisexual
Definition: sexual attraction to another person contingent upon deep emotional and romantic connection.

More Accurate Description: Women who are approaching the end of easy riding on the cock carousel and desperately want to lock down a good man before the wall or have the “baby rabies.”

With these in mind, a demisexual woman has resolved to restrict future access to her worn-out pussy to only those who want a deep, romantic connection (read: beta-provider LTR) with her. This is, of course, until she meets the next alpha who suits her fancy and is good for a quick one-nighter.

5. Asexual
Definition: is not sexually attracted to anyone; doesn’t have sexual feelings.

More Accurate Description: A woman who has allegedly never experienced sexual feelings yet signed up for a dating site and posted several extremely slutty, suggestive photos under the guise of “trying this out” or “just to make new friends”.

All indications indicate this woman has had multiple previous sexual encounters (including gangbangs), but is using the “asexual” label to discourage messages from thirsty betas who will pass over her profile because “she’s asexual”.

Conclusion
What’s common among each of these supposed new sexual orientations is that we already have a term that has long-described almost exactly the same kind of sexual attraction. This raises an important question: why are people classifying their sexual orientation under new, buzzword banners when there’s already a well-understood term that describes it precisely?

The answer lies in the attention-whoring tendencies of the two groups – a and b – that use these terms the most. To be merely bisexual isn’t counter-mainstream enough anymore and calling oneself that doesn’t get the same kind of attention it once did, when few people identified as this. Therefore, to feed the egos of members of these two groups, new terms for already-existing sexual orientations had to be conjured up to maintain a fresh supply of new attention and coverage.

They’re new labels for the same sort of old sexual behaviour. The next time you see an American woman who is calling herself sapiosexual, heteroflexible, or whatever new term is invented next month to describe long-standing sexual behavior, the most prudent option is to ignore it completely, as a shit test, and game on as you usually would.

These new sexual orientations are, for the most part, nothing more than a cry for attention. They win if we if give it to them.

Roosh V #fundie rooshv.com

[From "I Wish I Remained A Virgin"]

In the past, my advice to virgins was clear: do everything you can to lose your virginity. Improve your look, learn game, and start approaching numerous women so that you get lucky with one and stop being a dreaded virgin. I can no longer advise that. If you are a virgin in this current year, I advise you to stay that way until marriage.

Western culture has inverted the natural order. Sex has been elevated to a virtue and virginity demoted to a sin. If you don’t have a “sex life” then you’re missing out and must do everything within your power to remedy the problem. This is what I believed as I went through four painful years of high school and then four excruciating years of university as a virgin. Everyone was getting laid except for me, it seemed, and I was missing out on reams of pleasure and intimacy. I was in a state of extreme lust but could not get a single woman. I felt like a low-value man, a loser. Upon graduating from university, I implemented game teachings I had found online and lost my virginity within a year. Victory! I was no longer in a “sinful” state, and could “enjoy life” with the rest of my sexually active peers until, nearly twenty years later, I realized all that sex profited me not in the slightest.

Upon receiving the grace of God, I ceased all sexual activity. I don’t look at porn, or even sexy lingerie images. I don’t masturbate and definitely don’t fornicate. If sexual thoughts attack my mind, I pray to Jesus Christ to take them away, and He does. The closest I get to sex today is the occasional sex dream, but even in my dreams, I’ve developed willpower to usually say no to the flesh that is offered me. Aren’t I suffering like the days I was a virgin in school? Aren’t I in utmost pain from all my unmet sexual desires? The answer is no, because I’ve attacked the root cause of sexual pain: lust. Take away the lust, which is amplified in our pornographic culture, and you take away the ache and desire.

If you are a virgin in lust, and fail to gain physical pleasure, you will experience tremendous anguish. You will be angry at all the men who are getting laid, and you will also be angry at all the women for not choosing you for sex. You will masturbate to experience the pleasure of the orgasm, and then experience an immediate emotional hangover of having had to masturbate. This is an unbearable state that most men “solve” through prostitution, yet since a prostitute is not what any man truly wants, the pain and anguish intensify. Even for the sexually active man, the accomplished player, the pain of his lust is transmutated into other forms, such as the simultaneous addiction and hatred of “sluts.”

If the virgin doesn’t have God in his life, he will be in a heightened state of lust just like the fornicator, and suffer ill side effects from his pornography and masturbation habit, though he may sustain less damage to his soul since he is not corrupting women through the sex act. If he does have God in his life, he may feel lonely at times or curious about what sex is like, but these problems can easily be handled with just a mustard seed of faith. He will proceed in treating his body like the Holy Temple it was created for, further strengthening his walk with Christ.

EnglishVids #crackpot #dunning-kruger #fundie boards.christogenea.org

[From "100 Proofs the Israelite's Were White"]

The America Flag's 13 stripes are the 13 tribes of Israel

Before Israel even conquered the lands of Canaan it was already prophesied that one day Israel would have a new land. It would seem that God never intended it to be a permanent dwelling.

This new land is none other than America where the scattered lost tribes abroad finally regathered all together from Europe as one nation. Which overtime became the single greatest most prosperous nation ever to exist on earth.

Although Jacob (Israel) originally only had 12 sons, which later became the 12 tribes of Israel, we must remember that Joseph the 11th son, received a double portion and passed this inheritance onto his own two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh. Jacob made them his own sons and blessed them, thus making it a total of 13 tribes.

All Apostles have Traditional English names

Were the Apostles called Tyrone or Jasmin? How about Abu or Wang? No!

The names you commonly see over and over again are John, James, Matthew, Mary, Simon, Peter, Paul and so forth. The Apostles had traditional White names which carried on throughout Europe, to Britain and America over the centuries.

This is because the Apostles were White! Jesus was White and all Israel has always been white.

European Pagan God's derive from the Old Testament

As the Israelite's dispersed into Europe you'd expect to be able to trace a lot of their Pagan believes back to the original teachings of the Old Testament. Many European Pagan religions have the enemy being a Great Serpent. Along with evil Giants.

If you understand that the Serpent is not a literal serpent but simply all the evil races the descendants of Cain and the Genesis 6 corruptions, all together as a figurative Serpent. Whilst the Giants appeared amongst them, such as in the lands of Caanan. You can see it's the same story as the Bible, it's the same people the Israelites passing on there oral traditions

Wodin, or Odin It's clear that is a derivation of the Hebrew Adon, which means Lord. Our people always had a problem of deifiing ancient Kings. Odin was a king who led the Germanic tribes into Europe. He was just a man he existed.

Loki It's clear that is a derivation of Lucifer. Originally the C was hard so Luckifer or Lucky/Loki for short. In others Satan the father of the evil races, the head of the Great Serpent

In the end times a great battle Ragnarok would take place where the son of God, sometimes called Thor who return and we would all rise up together and fight this evil serpent race together.

Is that not exactly what the Bible teaches, Christ returning to save his people in the Armageddon. There are many more similirities. It all shows the Germanic tribes were the dispered Israelites and they were white.

Just me and Jesus #fundie #racist #psycho wnd.com

(Background: the article was on the Satanic Temple opposing Mississippi’s replacement of the Confederate flag with one that said “In God We Trust”.)

Just me and Jesus: I verily hope that these slime never, ever repent. I am going to be having sweet dreams about the Day when I can watch them be cast into the Lake of Fire and enjoy eternity listening to their sweet screams of anguish.

Dudley Dorite: I wonder how many of you are going to end up in the same place, after defending the Confederacy, a traitor government that sought to perpetuate a system where raping little black slave girls was perfectly legal, where it was perfectly legal for a slave owner to amputate a slave’s limb with an ax for being “disobedient”, or whip and rape a naked slave woman for fun without fear of the law, a Satanic government if there ever was one. You should be grateful MIssissippi has finally removed that Satanic symbol from its flag, because that is exactly what it is.

Just me and Jesus: The Confederate States of America was a godly institution that explicitly stated in its Constitution that it was a Christian Nation that revered God before all else. Contrast that with the biblically seditious U.S. Constitution and its blasphemous First Amendment and “no religious test” clause.

Between an openly Christian Nation and a blasphemous one that permits heretics and pagans to hold public office, I know which one God would rather bless. As for the slavery, God’s Word quite clearly permits His people to practice it. I don’t think it was a sin to outlaw the practice, but it wasn’t a sin to keep it, either. In fact, the Bible states that God marked the descendants of Ham (the father of the Africans) and destined them to be eternal slaves of other people. Therefore, God Himself mandated that Africans and their descendants are not true humans, but are to be seen as the potential property of everyone else.

So yes, I would much rather live in a Christian Confederacy than a blasphemous nation that only has God’s wrath to look forward to.

Matthew McLaughlin #homophobia #fundie #psycho metro.co.uk

[News story from 2015]

A Christian Californian lawyer has proposed a bill which would make it legal to murder gay people using ‘bullets in the head or any other convenient method’. Anyone who ‘touches another person of the same gender for sexual gratification’ would get the death penalty – administered either by state executioners, or members of the public. Attorney Matthew McLaughlin’s Sodomite Suppression Act would also make it an offence to campaign for gay rights, with penalties of up to 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine. Gay rights groups have called for McLaughlin to be disbarred after he filed his proposal, paying £135 for the privilege.

The bill says, ‘Seeing that it is better that offenders should die rather than that all of us should be killed by God’s just wrath against us for the folly of tolerating-wickedness in our midst, the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.’

Laura Wood #racist #fundie thinkinghousewife.com

[From "Francis and the Mystical Cult of Multiculturalism"]

JORGE BERGOGLIO, aka “Pope” Francis, worships man. In a particularly vivid display of this reverence, he kissed the feet of politicians from South Sudan this week. His famous knee problems did not prevent him from getting to the floor.

Humble pie. A true pope would consider this kind of groveling before any politicians an affront to papal dignity.

But it is highly unlikely that Francis would have kissed the feet of just any politicians, as much as he might have embraced their politics. It’s not surprising this type of display was reserved for Africans.

Similarly, does he urge Japan or Kenya to take in millions of immigrants from alien cultures? No, he urges Western countries, and Western countries only, to subsume their own cultures and keep open their borders to all who seek entry. The European man, whether he lives in Italy or America, is urged to destroy the stable cultural environment in which he thrives, not Asians and Africans.

But why is this?

The Vatican II religion is a cult of man. The worship of man inevitably leads to the cult of the Other, to the worship of man most foreign to the culture of Europe, the wellspring of Catholicism on every continent.

[...]

For multiculturalists, “diversity” is just a code word for a forced, homogenous sameness. They seek to destroy the true diversity of peoples created by God. They are opposed to nature and to the adoration owed to God alone.

They kiss the feet of not just any man, but the non-European most of all.

Walk into a “Catholic” church today in an American suburb, and you will probably see a smiling picture of an African somewhere in the vestibule. Not that Africans can’t be just as much part of the universal Church or aren’t worthy of charity. But the ubiquity of African faces sends a political message. “See, we are multiculturalists too.” It’s pandering and demeaning to Africans, who must in many cases see through the vanity of it all. It’s all about the goodness of the worshipper, not the object of such attention, who is deprived of his real humanity when he becomes an idol.

Larry Solomon #fundie #sexist biblicalsexology.com

(This is a follow-up to a previous post.)

What God Wants Women to Want From Sex

In Exodus 21:10-11 we read “If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish. And if he do not these three unto her, then shall she go out free without money”. The phrase “duty of marriage” refers to her conjugal rights or in other words, the husband’s duty to have sex with his wife.

So, in similar fashion to Proverbs 5:15’s comparison of sex for men to the human need for water, in Exodus 21:10-11 God compares sex for women to the human need for food and clothing. So, we can rightly say based on the Word of God that sex is a need for both men and women.

And it is because of this truth, that both men and women need sex that God gave these commands found in 1 Corinthians 7:3-4:

“Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife”.

But just because men and women both need sex does that mean they need it to the same degree?

If we look at the needs that the Bible compares a woman’s sexual need to and then look at the need it compares a man’s sexual need to, we can answer this question.

Which can the human body go longer without? Food and clothing or water? Under temperate climate conditions the human body can go for an extended and perhaps indefinite period of time without clothing. And while food is a more important need than clothing, the human body can go weeks without food. The human being can live 30 to 60 days without food. But most human beings cannot go more than 3 days without water or they will die.

So yes, men and women both need sex. The Bible makes this very clear. But it also shows in how it compares the need for sex in men and women that sex is a far greater need for man. And that is a realization that every Christian woman needs to come to.

Now that we have established that sex is a need for women, even if women do not typically need as often as men. We then have to look at the difference in reasons that men and women need sex. While men need sex primarily to fulfil their physical and psychological thirst for the female body, women need sex for two primary reasons.

The first is that just as God created man with insatiable thirst for woman’s body, God also created women with a strong desire to be desired by man. When a man takes his woman in the act of sex, it fulfills her need to feel beautiful to him, to feel desired by him and ultimately to feel loved by him.

In Psalm 45:11, in a prophecy concerning Christ and his Church, the Bible says “So shall the king greatly desire thy beauty: for he is thy Lord; and worship thou him”. When we remember that man’s created purpose is to image God with his life then we understand the strong desire of men toward the beauty of woman. Man’s desire for the beauty of woman’s body symbolizes Christ’s desire for the beauty of his church.

And when we understand that woman was created for man, then we understand why women have a strong need to feel beautiful and desired by men. Men desire the beauty of women, so God designed women to desire to be beautiful for men. Men desire to take and use a woman’s body for their sexual pleasure and to meet this desire in men God designed women to desire to taken by men sexually. It is sin that corrupts these desires in women or causes them to deny these desires they have toward men.

This is why we read from the wife in Song of Solomon 7:10 “I am my beloved’s, and his desire is toward me”. The wife wants her man to desire her beauty. But not just her beauty. She wants her beloved to desire to take her body and use it for his pleasure. In Song of Solomon 4:16 the wife invites her husband to feast upon her body when she makes the following statement:

“Awake, O north wind; and come, thou south; blow upon my garden, that the spices thereof may flow out. Let my beloved come into his garden, and eat his pleasant fruits”.

And in the Song of Solomon 1:1 the wife says of her husband: “Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth: for thy love is better than wine”.

When we take all of these Scriptures together what do we see that women should want from sex? They should want their husband to desire their beauty and to take and use their body for his pleasure. They should would want him to embrace them and kiss them and by doing all this show his love and desire for them.

But the second reason for a woman’s need for sex, that God has placed in her nature, is her need to have children. This is a defining need of a woman.

Let me illustrate from my own life origin story. My aunt, my father’s brother’s wife, told me recently that when their son was born my mom and dad came over and my mom held their son in her arms. That same evening, when my mom went home, she jumped my dad’s bones and boom, she was pregnant with me.

But outside these two powerful needs that drive women to have sex with men there is another spiritual reason which should drive Christian women to want to have sex with their husbands. And that reason is that they fully realize they were made for him and specifically to meet his need in this area of sex. It pleases him and gives him passion toward them and toward everything else in his life. This should drive any Christian woman to want sex as often as she can have it with her husband.

Larry Solomon #fundie #sexist biblicalsexology.com

(I imagine most of you are acquainted with Larry Solomon, of ‘Biblical Gender Roles’ fame. He has started a new blog called ‘Biblical Sexology’, the content of which should be pretty predictable considering the content of his previous blog. This post is part 1 of a two-part post.)

What God Wants Men to Want From Sex

Today we are told that the primary thing husbands should want from sex is to emotionally bond with their wives. Many Christian teachers teach that is sinful for a man to desire sex with his wife purely for his own physical pleasure. That he should never “sexually objectify” his wife and view her as an object for his sexual use and pleasure. They teach this as part of their larger belief that we should never want anything for ourselves, but instead we should only be looking to do good things for others.

They base this false teaching on a misinterpretation and misapplication of Bible passages like Philippians 2:4 which states “Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others”. The problem is that they ignore a very important word in that verse and that word is “also”. There is absolutely no sin in a person seeking to meet their own needs or even their own desires as long as they also consider the needs and desires others.

The truth that may shock many Christian readers is that God actually encourages men to use their wife’s body to meet their sexual thirsts.

In Romans 1:26-27 we read the following:

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet”.

God uses different language for sex when it comes men and women. In the context of homosexuality, God says that women “change the natural use into that which is against nature”.

So, what is “the natural use” which Romans 1:26 refers to? We find out in the very next verse. In Romans 1:27 we are told that the natural use refers to “men, leaving the natural use of the woman”. In other words, women were created for man’s sexual use.

If we turn back to the Old Testament, we see God elaborating on this purpose of woman, to be used for man’s sexual pleasure. In Proverbs 5:15 we read “Drink waters out of thine own cistern, and running waters out of thine own well”. In this passage God compares a man’s sexual desire for woman to the human thirst for water. In other words, God is saying sex is a very important need for a man. And God has given men their wives’ bodies to meet their sexual thirst.

But later in the same passage of Scripture we read in Proverbs 5:18-19:

“Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love”.

Between Romans 1:27, Proverbs 5:15 and then Proverbs 5:18-19 we see that what the church teaches men they should want from sex today is WRONG. When they condemn husbands for wanting to use their wife’s body for their own sexual pleasure they do so in direct contradiction to the written Word of God.

If you are a man reading this and you desire to satisfy yourself with your wife’s body, to drink your fill of it and to use it for your own pleasure – there is no sin in this desire. But rather this desire is holy and part of God’s design of your masculine nature. You may have been raised your whole life to be ashamed of such desires. But I implore you based upon the clear teachings of the Bible, that you leave your shame behind and fully embrace the God created desires in you that you have toward woman.

Legendarywristcel #fundie #sexist incels.is

(Caesercel)
Athiesm does not mean a support for hedonistic degeneracy. The prime goal of liberal left is degeneracy, athiesm is just another tool they use to dismantle religion.

(Legendarywristcel)
True. A lot of foids equate "there is no god with " "get out there and start sucking chad dick "

Robert Teske #ufo #fundie #wingnut #conspiracy amazon.com

This is the "Grandfather" of all conspiracy theories in regards to Ufology, ET, and everything "Alien". The famed "Roswell Crash of 1947" is just the "tip of the iceberg". The Prophesies of Revelation, Daniel, and Ezekiel are playing out before our eyes today, before the eyes of THIS generation TODAY! In view of the current environmental, social, political, and economical atmosphere that permeates every culture of this world, you must be able to see the BIGGER picture; the entire spectrum, if you will, not just one color. And that spectrum goes far beyond what anyone could have ever perceived possible. It goes beyond science fiction. Hollywood couldn’t even have conceived the reality of Hell ON, BENEATH, or ABOVE Earth. But rest assured, they will damned sure try to convince you otherwise. With that said, don’t even try to imagine what is between the covers of this manuscript. You have to read it for yourself. There will be many who will discard any and all notion that any of this could remotely be true. Are the words between these cover true? I don’t know. I pray to God that they’re NOT. But I will tell you this much, I have definitely gone through an Attitude Adjustment, and I have seriously begun to question my concepts of reality. We are living in very dangerous and very treacherous times. So read on and see if any of this makes as much sense to you as it does to me. Open your hearts, open your minds, and question EVERYTHING!

TFP Student Action #homophobia #fundie tfpstudentaction.org

1. It Is Not Marriage
Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.


2. It Violates Natural Law
Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law.

Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.

Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.

Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)

3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother
It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.

The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.

Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle
In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants.

Civil laws are structuring principles of man's life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.

Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.

5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right
Homosexual activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.

This is false.

First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected.

Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.

Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between two individuals of the same sex.

6. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union
Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. It naturally tends to create families.

On the contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses” want a child, they must circumvent nature by costly and artificial means or employ surrogates. The natural tendency of such a union is not to create families.Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage.

7. It Defeats the State’s Purpose of Benefiting Marriage
One of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is beneficial to the upbringing of children—all fruit of the mutual affection of the parents. This aids in perpetuating the nation and strengthening society, an evident interest of the State.

Homosexual “marriage” does not provide such conditions. Its primary purpose, objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the protection the State extends to true marriage.

8. It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society
By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes its official and active promoter. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval.

In the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed more than ever to this new “morality,” businesses offering wedding services will be forced to provide them for same-sex unions, and rental property owners will have to agree to accept same-sex couples as tenants.

In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect Christians and all people of good will to betray their consciences by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the natural order and Christian morality.

9. It Is the Cutting Edge of the Sexual Revolution
In the 1960s, society was pressured to accept all kinds of immoral sexual relationships between men and women. Today we are seeing a new sexual revolution where society is being asked to accept sodomy and same-sex “marriage.”

If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior? Indeed, radical elements of certain “avant garde” subcultures are already advocating such aberrations.

The railroading of same-sex “marriage” on the American people makes increasingly clear what homosexual activist Paul Varnell wrote in the Chicago Free Press:

"The gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people's view of homosexuality."

10. It Offends God
This is the most important reason. Whenever one violates the natural moral order established by God, one sins and offends God. Same-sex “marriage” does just this. Accordingly, anyone who professes to love God must be opposed to it.

Marriage is not the creature of any State. Rather, it was established by God in Paradise for our first parents, Adam and Eve. As we read in the Book of Genesis: “God created man in His image; in the Divine image he created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them, saying: ‘Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.’” (Gen. 1:28-29)

The same was taught by Our Savior Jesus Christ: “From the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife.” (Mark 10:6-7).

Genesis also teaches how God punished Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of homosexuality: “The Lord rained down sulphurous fire upon Sodom and Gomorrah. He overthrew those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the cities and the produce of the soil.” (Gen. 19:24-25)

Taking a Principled not a Personal Stand
In writing this statement, we have no intention to defame or disparage anyone. We are not moved by personal hatred against any individual. In intellectually opposing individuals or organizations promoting the homosexual agenda, our only intent is the defense of traditional marriage, the family, and the precious remnants of Christian civilization.

As practicing Catholics, we are filled with compassion and pray for those who struggle against unrelenting and violent temptation to homosexual sin. We pray for those who fall into homosexual sin out of human weakness, that God may assist them with His grace.

We are conscious of the enormous difference between these individuals who struggle with their weakness and strive to overcome it and others who transform their sin into a reason for pride and try to impose their lifestyle on society as a whole, in flagrant opposition to traditional Christian morality and natural law. However, we pray for these too.

We pray also for the judges, legislators and government officials who in one way or another take steps that favor homosexuality and same-sex “marriage.” We do not judge their intentions, interior dispositions, or personal motivations.

We reject and condemn any violence. We simply exercise our liberty as children of God (Rom. 8:21) and our constitutional rights to free speech and the candid, unapologetic and unashamed public display of our Catholic faith. We oppose arguments with arguments. To the arguments in favor of homosexuality and same-sex “marriage” we respond with arguments based on right reason, natural law and Divine Revelation.

In a polemical statement like this, it is possible that one or another formulation may be perceived as excessive or ironic. Such is not our intention.

Unnamed Pakistan International Airlines employees and MisBis #fundie bbc.com

Pakistan's national airline has been mocked after a goat was sacrificed to ward off bad luck following one of the country's worst air disasters.

Pictures went viral showing PIA ground staff slaughtering a black goat next to an ATR-42 aircraft which was about to leave for a domestic flight.

It was the first such flight since PIA grounded its ATR fleet for tests after a 7 December crash killed 47 people.

In Pakistan killing a black goat is supposed by many to ward off evil.

But the move by ground staff in Islamabad prompted hoots of incredulity once it was established the images were genuine and had not been photo-shopped.

A Pakistan International Airlines spokesman was swift to point out the goat had been slaughtered by employees on their own initiative and the airline management had no hand in it.

The Dawn newspaper covered the event in a front page story headlined "PIA: on a wing and a prayer". The headline of the Express Tribune newspaper read: "PIA lampooned for bizarre goat slaughter".

The Express Tribune commented that the "ritual sacrifice shows fear besetting the PIA employees associated with flight operations, especially those assigned to ATRs".

Comments on social media were mixed - while many mocked PIA for indulging in superstition, others defended the slaughter as a practice endorsed by Islam.

[…]

Meanwhile, one Twitter user by the name of MisBis spoke for many when she wrote: "There's nothing wrong in giving Sadqa [sacrificial offering]… Sadqa bari balao se bachata hai [it hedges against many troubles]… stop making it a joke".

Michael Pearl #fundie #wingnut nogreaterjoy.org

Q: “Should a mature ten-year-old be allowed to switch a two-year-old if the mother is unavailable, for example, during a temper tantrum?”

A: If a child is not old enough or mature enough to spank the younger sibling, he is not qualified to be the temporary guardian. A child should never be left in the care of one who is not trusted to assume authority to spank when needed. If you can not trust them to execute discipline, then you can not trust them to be the primary care taker of your child. If a child is ever left in the presence of one who does not have full authority, then you are allowing the child a dispensation of unrestrained rebellion. When a child says to another, “You can’t tell me what to do, you are not my mother,” you can be sure the mother can’t tell the child what to do either.

True submission comes from the heart and is not restricted to one or two feared authority figures. Every mature person is consciously or subconsciously aware of an inherent rule of law to which we are all obligated. This is a growing consciousness in children. This understanding is placed in us at creation (Gen.3:22), and is enforced by what we see in nature (Rom. 1: 19-20), and by a direct moral light from Jesus Christ (John 1:9). The child reared in the Christian family has the added light of Scripture and example. Same as adults, children are often tempted to ignore the dictates of conscious and to peruse a course of self-gratification and rebellion. As their understanding of moral obligation emerges, they must be taught and disciplined to follow this law of love and good will. If they are caused to view their obligation as extending no further than their parents, they are given the false impression that their parents are the highest law. They should be taught that there are no exceptions to their obligations; they are never out from under the law of love, decency, goodness, kindness, respect, etc. No matter who reminds them of their duty, whether it be a younger child or a stranger, they should recognize the authority of a law higher than all earthly authority, and bow in submission. To rebel against another who is attempting to enforce that law is to rebel against God who placed this law in all men. A ten-year-old ought to be mature enough to discipline a smaller child. If they are not, one of the things that will help them mature is to give them real responsibility over the small child. If you want to breed hostility and cause divisions in the family, just put a ten-year-old in charge of a four-year- old and forbid the ten-year-old from disciplining the younger child. He or she will despise the rebellious child and resent being put in that position. It is totally irresponsible to all parties involved to place a child under one whose hands are tied. In our house, there was no difference between the parents and the older children in authority over the younger children. I supported the commands of my twelve-year-old over my four-year-old just like I did the commands of my wife.

Lori Alexander #fundie #wingnut thetransformedwife.com

Lori: In 1946, Dr. Benjamin Spock wrote a child raising book that changed parenting styles everywhere. I am going to take some quotes of his and give a response and try to keep it biblical and from what I have seen as a result of his teachings. The majority of Americans still believe that spanking, NOT physical abuse, is still acceptable, thankfully, since they have seen how effective it is in dealing with children’s bad behavior. “In all 50 states and the District of Columbia, you are not forbidden by law to use corporal punishment on your child as long as the form of punishment is reasonable and does not cause injury.”

Dr. Spock: “[Physical punishment] certainly plays a role in our acceptance of violence. If we are ever to turn toward a kindlier society and a safer world, a revulsion against the physical punishment of children would be a good place to start.” (p. 173)

Lori: This is in direct contradiction to what God tells us in His Word. “Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.” (Proverbs 22:15) “Oh, but the rod isn’t a physical instrument,” people will tell me. Really? Please study all of the verses that mention the rod and you will see that this isn’t true.

How does God discipline us? Is He only positive and encouraging? No! “For whom the Lord loves he chastens, and scourges every son whom he receives” (Hebrews 12:6). Chasten means “to correct by punishment; to punish; to inflict pain of reclaiming an offender; as, to chasten a son with a rod.” Scourge means “to afflict for sins or faults, and with the purpose of correction.”

Who are we to think we know better than God? No, God doesn’t mean that we should physically abuse our children in any way. We use the rod of correction as a tool to make them obey and this teaches them self-discipline which benefits them for life. Many things in God’s Word have been taken to extremes and have caused harm for people. This is not God’s way. His way ends in peace and goodness not in evil and harm.

Dr. Spock: “My other reasons for advising against physical punishment are, in brief, that it teaches children that might makes right, that it encourages some children to be bullies, and most fundamentally, that to the degree that it results in good behavior it’s because of the fear of pain. I have a strong belief that the best reason for behaving well is that you like people, want to get along with them, want them to like you.” (p. 173)

Lori: On the contrary, pain and fear are great motivators for good as I shared in the above verse about how God disciplines us. My children were all spanked when they sinned against us or others and none of them were bullies or got into physical fights with others. They were kind to others, respected authority, and were a joy to raise. A one year old can’t comprehend “liking people” as much as they can quickly comprehend a small amount of pain that is swiftly administered for disobedience.

Dr. Spock: “I don’t think physical punishment is necessary or particularly effective.” (p. 215)

Lori: It sure has been for centuries before you wrote your book, Dr. Spock. Children were much better behaved than they are now. God’s ways will always trumps man’s ways.

Dr. Spock: “All schools should be friendly, creative places like the best I’ve seen. We should wean ourselves away from physical punishment.” (p. 33)

Lori: When I went to elementary school, the principal had a wooden paddle in his office and he used it! Children were well-behaved for the most part. There was nothing going on like there is in the schools today. A swat on the back side is a quick, effective method against disobedience. (I just did read that 19 states still allow corporal punishment in schools.)

Dr. Spock: “Recently I visited a small private school . . . with the idea of asking children . . . what advice to parents they’d like me to incorporate in the forthcoming revision of Baby and Child Care. In a thoughtful mood, the class was unanimous that parents should not hit their children. . . One child added that if you’re crying and your parent tells you to stop and then hits you when you don’t stop, it only makes you cry more.” (p. 229-233)

Lori: And asking children how they should be disciplined is a wise thing? If he asked adults how they would like their government to run, I’m sure some immature adults would say that they shouldn’t be put in prison for abusing drugs, driving drunk, and getting tickets for speeding and running red lights. Children do NOT know best how they should be raised. Why not interview parents of adult children who are now upstanding citizens and ask how they raised their children instead?

Dr. Spock: “I hope American parents can outgrow the conviction . . . that physical punishment is necessary to bring up well-behaved children. . . [T]here are parts of the world where it has never occurred to any adult to strike a child. I have known personally or professionally dozens of families in which the parents never lifted a hand–or otherwise punished or humiliated their children–and yet the children were ideally cooperative and polite. Children are eager to be ever more grown up and responsible.” (p. 13)

Lori: Yes, I am sure parents can raise good children without ever spanking them but it takes a lot more time, energy, and effort and to tell you the truth, I haven’t seen many who are successful at it. In order for spankings to work, a parent must be consistent, firm, and loving. It doesn’t work without these three key ingredients.

Dr. Spock: “There are several reasons to avoid physical punishment. It teaches children that the larger, stronger person has the power to get his way, whether or not he is in the right. Some spanked children then feel quite justified in beating up on smaller ones. The American tradition of spanking may be one reason there is much more violence in our country than in any other comparable nation.”

Lori: No, it teaches children that they must obey and respect the authority in their lives, whether they be parents, teachers, coaches, bosses, and government which is a good thing. My children never beat up on the smaller ones. If they did, they would have been spanked and would have never done it again!

Since your book has been practiced, Dr. Spock, violence has sky-rocketed in our nation. No, thank you. I much prefer God’s ways to your ways since God is our Creator who made us and knows the right and perfect way to parent children.

Chasten thy son while there is hope, and let not thy soul spare for his crying.
Proverbs 19:18

Anonymous #fundie #conspiracy #racist #crackpot #magick #wingnut 8kun.top

My grandfather was a volunteer with Arājs Kommando. In 1982 shortly before his death I visited my relatives in Jelgava and asked him about the war. I was just a child, but what he told me I'll never forget.

His unit were police battling armed criminal gangs and communist terrorists. One of the gangs was a pedophile gang kidnapping children. They had no idea what they were getting into.

They staked out the the gang's hiding place and saw people going in for what appeared to be a religious ceremony. They were supposed to just watch and identify the people involved, but when they heard the screaming of a child being raped or tortured they one of the men couldn't control himself and went in, they had to arrest everyone there.

It had been a Satanic ritual. The child was raped and exsanguinated in a sacrifice. Everyone they arrested was a communist Jew. A treasure trove of documents were recovered, most were membership lists and plans for terrorist attacks, but some were talking about exterminating the Amaleks. The main plan seemed to be to take control with a communist dictatorship and execute all of the Amalek for minor crimes. If that failed they'd be propagandized into being hated by everyone in the world. There was even a plan to exterminated them by through immigration of African males and breeding them out of existence.

Most of the Satanists did not talk they were simply content to being executed for their monstrous crimes. One was willing to talk, because "no one will believe you" he admitted the Amalek are "The Isrealites, the Europeans, You!" They raped the child is because "Moloch demands it" real satanists mutilate children's genitals. It separates the serious from the fakers, there is no higher evil than defiling a child. "Only once you've proven yourself can Lucifer grant you his power to control the minds of the goyim."

As he put down these monsters at Rumbula, they did not beg for mercy. They offered prayers to Moloch and claimed to have "already won." He said it felt as if God himself was pulling the trigger. That the world was just that much brighter and more hopeful when they were done. They left out most of this from the reports, everyone was just a communist or communist supporter.

I thought him a crazy old man of course. My relatives said he was never quite right after the war. I mostly forgot about him. Moloch? Amalek? I'd never heard of any of this nonsense before.

Then when Pedestas emails were leaked and pizzagate happened I fucking shit myself. It all made sense. It's all real. The nazis were literally fighting against the devil and the devil won. We're living in hell.

Andy Schlafly #fundie #sexist #crackpot conservapedia.com

Gender-neutral terminology is used by politically correct liberals in a ploy to efface the natural differences between men and women, sometimes with absurd effect. Thus, although in legal texts the word "he" and "his" have been used for centuries to apply to both sexes, political correctness advocates insist on the cumbersome "he or she", "his or her". Sometimes people mistakenly use of "they" (or "their") despite the fact that this usage is grammatically incorrect. They also try to abolish terms as policeman, fireman, postman, fisherman, chairman, actress and waitress, claiming they are sexist terms. Use of gender-neutral language is a hallmark of overly liberal translations of the Bible.

Some languages use different words or suffixes depending on the gender of a noun, and attribute gender to non-people nouns. However, formal English does not ascribe gender to inanimate objects and defaults to the "male" pronouns or words when referring to either gender. For example, "All men are created equal," is correct English and the statement includes both males and females.

The fact that there are two different genders – male and female, based on one's biological sex – is affirmed through Scripture:
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. Genesis 1:27 (ESV)

Word Salad Award

Maryann Rada #ufo #fundie #moonbat #crackpot ninespath.com

The knowledge of Nine is the knowledge of divinity, of mystery, of truth. It is truly a divine mystery, you could say. The unraveling of it is the grandest pursuit and the most rewarding. It is the knowledge which begins and ends understanding and which takes understanding beyond itself so that it becomes something else altogether. Nine is consciousness; it is the basis of manifest form as an expression of Self. Nine is itself without form in manifestation, yet is within the essence of all form. Speaking of Nine, it would be a good idea to review the way the communication works. OM is the source of everything. From there originate all universes. You are aware of one out of an infinitude of universes, yet each universe is holographically related to all others. In fact, you also exist in all other universes at once. This is what is called, by many, being multidimensional beings existing simultaneously in alternate realities, yet it is more than that. Not only do you exist in alternate realities simultaneously, you also exist in realities outside of time, unbound by location, and incomprehensible in terms of either time or space. That is the aspect of existence in which you are awareness of OM. There is nothing so otherworldly about that, as it is your natural state of being as an emanation of OM. All of your experiences of multidimensionality, trans-dimensionality, hyperdimensionality, et cetera, are merely impressions of awareness into the definitions of reality you create as OM. None of it is ever wrong; all of it is fed back to the source of beingness in a loop of never-ending, ever-changing intelligence. Bringing your attention now to your experience in the now you know as you life on Earth today, you are always in contact with OM through this arrangement of intelligence-gathering being. Every molecule of your being is. The collective of individuals also experiencing this now are. You as you exist in all other realities also are in direct connection with the intelligent beingness of OM.

What is the nature of that connection? Here is where we get into the territory of Nine. The harmonic structure of the fabric of all reality, whether it is 3-D on Earth in the 21st century or of another planet, galaxy or universe altogether is in accord with the essential truths of OM, which are simple, elegant, and marked by the frequency of Nine. That is, they have at their core a common understanding of being as expressed in the simplest of terms as a numerical knowledge base upon which can be built any system of reality-construct imaginable. Nine as is commonly understood on the basis of arithmetic has some peculiar properties. Numerologically, too, it is of interest for its particular meanings. As an integer, it is the highest of singular expressions, and as the code of divinity it is full of elegance and sublime mystery. These are the commonly known aspects of Nine.

OM does not rely on a pocket calculator to determine the nature of Nature, but creates according to the knowingness of I AM. All that is is because I AM exists in everything and is in the essence of everything as divinity itself. I AM is what makes water wet, what makes joy happy, what makes home. I AM is how OM is known. I AM my self alone is a statement of the function of One. A statement of the function of Two would be I AM someone in relation to other than my self. A statement of the function of Three would be I AM of a derivative. Of Four, I AM part of. Of Five, I AM engaged with reality in a particular form. Of Six, I AM in search of Source. Of Seven, I AM within framework of understanding. Of Eight, I AM united with other. Of Nine, I AM.

Beyond the I AM of Nine, there are only permutations and complications of the core base of creation of OM. Beyond OM cannot be. Are there other multiversal creations which source from other than OM, you ask? All multiversal creation is of OM and no other. Is there any other creation besides OM’s creative emanance? Does OM have a source? These are questions worthy of exploration. They are not questions to be taken lightly, that is sure. First, let us explore the back yard. Venturing down the street is premature, at the moment. You may understand more by staying close to home until you have a map of the neighborhood and learn the basics of celestial navigation.

The knowledge of Nine is the knowledge of divinity, of mystery, of truth.

Nearly all of the energy you see as matter has been brought into being by thought. You have a thought, it coalesces. What exactly happens in the process of thinking? Let us explore from the point of view of a person in touch with Nine.

First, you must understand what we, who live as beings in constant awareness of Nine, do to stay in that awareness. There is only one slight difference between seeking the constant awareness of Nine and maintaining it, and it is simply a matter of making the intention into a reality. Thus it is in all things. Before a thing was a thing, it was a consideration, an intention, a thought. The shift from the state of thought to the state of mass-measurable thing is no less than a shift in the thinker of the thought from a being which considers itself to be merely the construct of some other being’s thinking to the awareness of self divine. Since divinity has for a long time been misunderstood from the personal experience of self, the art of making reality has been left to artists. The dreamers of dreams either had to work very hard or have a natural magic at work for them. Large amounts of money also helped. Times have changed and so has the ability of mere mortals to taste of the divine. It is a nectar that awaits discovery within every molecule of your being. Recognize it as such and you will experience transfiguration. It is your knowledge of self as divinely created that leads you to the experience of religious ecstasy and spiritual bliss. Knowledge of your self as the embodiment of the thought of the divine I AM leads beyond bliss, past ecstasy, to the very threshold of the divine source itself. This is living in awareness of Nine.

When a being in the state of awareness of Nine thinks a thought, the cycle of creation begins anew. From the awareness of the thought through the voicing of it to another, through the process of taking form and learning how to express its essence, how to be, how to say, “I AM” — a thought becomes manifest. Before you know it, you have for good or for ill created something. There are countless ways such thinking can end up, and what determines the outcome most directly is your awareness as the originating thinker.

Moshe Kelstein #crackpot #fundie #sexist returnofkings.com

(Submitter’s Note: A lot more quackery is omitted for the sake of brevity.)

A Scientific Review of RoK’s Community Beliefs.
…
Moshe Kelstein
Moshe is a man on a mission. A mission to defeat degeneracy once and for all!

…
I discovered Return of Kings on Facebook when an acquaintance shared the community beliefs (http://www.returnofkings.com/about) on her profile. She was mocking them, as if these beliefs had no value. I commented that these beliefs were empirically supported or derived from empirically supported principles.

An army of offended females and betas was unleashed upon me. I wasn’t hoping for much from the girls, but I could only feel sad to see that many guys were naively supporting them.

Going to the research

I realized that most people have no first-hand contact with scientific knowledge. Literature on our community beliefs is not only existent, but extensive. I decided to use my academic knowledge to give support to the ROK community.

Many of the authors you will read about here are some of the most famous academics in behavioral sciences (Google scholar citations: Baron-Cohen[https://scholar.google.nl/citations?user=4GAQ-RUAAAAJ&hl=en]: 96 020, Buss[https://scholar.google.nl/citations?user=wrmnCfsAAAAJ&hl=en]: 39 524, Baumeister[https://scholar.google.nl/citations?user=ShSEUuoAAAAJ&hl=en]: 87 528). I do not claim that these summaries and articles will help you in arguments. We live in some sort of ochlocracy where we risk intimidation by hordes of angry women or betas if we hold beliefs congruent with scientific evidence. I remember a feminist saying something along the lines of: ”Nothing like good old scientific facts to justify your sexism.”

This research is usually not spread too much, especially in undergraduate programs, but really informative. Let us now examine what science has to say about each point in our community beliefs list.

…

2. Men will opt out of monogamy and reproduction if there are no incentives to engage in them

The psychological literature refers to this concept as Sexual Economics[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15582858], when referring to the investment that a male is ready to make in order to ”buy” a woman’s sexuality. Women sell sex, and men buy it. This investment varies between cultures and periods.

There was a time when years of courtship and long term financial investment were necessary to obtain sex from a woman. Not anymore. The invention of contraception multiplied the offer of sex tenfold. Women together manage the worth of sexual acts, and it might explain why women despise prostitution and pornography, and slut-shame each other. An average girl who asks a price that is too high for the sexual economy will not find a buyer.

If a woman’s sexuality has been offered a lot, the value of the offer will decrease. This means that a woman’s sexuality is non-renewable. Women will try to protect their sexual reputation and to make others believe that their sexuality is exclusive.

3. Past traditions and rituals that evolved alongside humanity served a clear benefit to the family unit

Until the latest decades, culture was a tool for the genes to be passed on. The maturation of humans is extremely long compared to many other species, which shows the importance of upbringing and learning the norms of a social group. Most traditional sex roles can be seen as a way to assess the best mates among men and women.

Men would benefit the gene pool by passing genes with agentic traits to lead the group to higher goals, whereas women displayed feminine qualities to display nurturing qualities to attractive males. The opposite was inconceivable because men outperform females in literally any sort of competition, and women are better at nurturing children and showing empathy[http://cogsci.bme.hu/~ivady/bscs/read/bc.pdf]. Naturally, the most successful male picked the most attractive female and both offered the finances and care a child needed. It was beneficial to the family unit, which was in turn beneficial to the continuity of the society.

Now, people are mysteriously invested in the mission of destroying gender roles, cheer on parents who crossdress their children and encourage companies to advertise toy trucks with girls. Everyone wants to eliminate gender roles but no one really knows why. Meanwhile, masculine men are still more desirable[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1087598/] and successful and feminine women more attractive [http://www.robertburriss.com/pdfs/burriss_11_paid.pdf] (although this relationship is a little more complicated). Women’s self-rated attractiveness[http://alittlelab.stir.ac.uk/pubs/Vukovic_08_selfrate_att_voices_PID.pdf] is strongly linked to attraction to masculine faces[http://alittlelab.stir.ac.uk/pubs/DeBruine_10_faceconfounds_JEPHPP.pdf], and prefer vocal masculinity. Denying these preferences will only prevent you from getting laid. Even though we are waging war against gender roles, women still apply them when choosing mates. (Interestingly, there is a negative relationship between physical self-evaluation and the number of sexual partners[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016230959390015A] in women.)

4. Testosterone is the biological cause for masculinity. Environmental changes that reduce the hormone’s concentration in men causes them to be weaker and more feminine.

Testosterone masculinizes both behavior and physical appearance, as stated above, and lack thereof feminizes them. However these environmental forces obviously refer to something of which I have no awareness of. Didn’t they fix the problems with plastic feeding bottles already? Or do you call ”environmental change” the emasculation of teenage boys in cathedral choirs until about a hundred years?

…
6. Elimination of traditional sex roles and the promotion of unlimited mating choice in women unleashes their promiscuity and other negative behaviors that block family formation.

The chances of fertilization are higher in one-night stands, and men’s sperm count is higher when they are away from their long-term partner for a while. The human penis might have been shaped to remove competitor’s sperm [http://www.epjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/ep021223.pdf] out of the vagina. Women experience more orgasms with masculine [http://www.putslab.psu.edu/pdfs/Puts%20et%20al%202012%20Evol%20Hum%20Behav.pdf] and attractive men, who have qualities sought for short term mating. Many benefits exist to short-term matings for women, such as resources, mate switching or manipulation.

All of these examples suggest that women did not evolve a preference for monogamous, long-term relationships. Click here [https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sexual-personalities/201501/women-want-short-term-mates-too] for evidence that women are designed for short-term mating.

…
7. Socialism, feminism, cultural Marxism, and social justice warriorism aim to destroy the family unit, decrease the fertility rate, and impoverish the state through large welfare entitlements.

Complying with feminist demands is as close as a society can get to cultural and ethnic suicide. Historically, intrasexual (male) competition always benefited the group. The feminist sentiment rose to power when outcomes were not shared with the the whole group, and rich people would get rich at the expense of others without paying taxes.

Women, depending on a single provider, began experiencing the variable outcomes that men have gone through for thousands of generations. That is why they support financial entitlement measures. The benefits they could get out of their sexuality became as variable as men’s outcomes. Now, they can have the best genes by engaging in short-term mating, and their basic needs paid for by millions of anonymous working men.

Later they will fight for their right not to be judged on their sexual past, and when they will realize the hardships of a working life or just get bored and have children, they will get support from the state. Men are backing them up in every step of the way.

Cultural marxism is the greatest ideological battle of the Western world at the moment. We are paying people to fight against manspreading, or funding university research that operationalizes sexism with agreement to items like ”Women, compared to men, tend to have a superior moral sensibility.”[http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Glick/publication/232586301_Ambivalent_sexism/links/02e7e52e69acf151c8000000.pdf]

Few academic researchers would support prescriptive conclusions based on their research, even though we can use their results to justify our beliefs. Even David Buss, who studies sex differences and evolutionary psychology, calls himself a feminist and does not see sex differences and feminism as incompatible.[http://www.bradley.edu/dotAsset/196924.pdf]

I don’t think anyone who believes in any form of biological determinism is compatible with the blank-slate perspective of SJWism. We don’t have popular support, but we have plenty of scientific evidence backing us up.

Bro. Michael Dimond, O.S.B. #fundie mostholyfamilymonastery.com

[From "Benedict XVI’s Incredible Heresies on “the Orthodox”: He Teaches That Schism Is Holiness" about a letter he wrote to the Coptic Church on the death of their leader]

The adherents of the “Orthodox” sects reject Papal Infallibility and Papal Primacy. The Catholic Church has always considered them schismatics and on the road to everlasting damnation. Yet, as he has done for years, Benedict XVI lavishes endless praises upon schismatic “Orthodox” leaders.

Benedict XVI teaches formal heresy a number of times in this letter. He teaches formal heresy by stating that schismatics can follow the “paths of holiness” without the Catholic faith and outside the Church. Specifically, Benedict XVI says that by taking this role as a schismatic leader, the schismatic will “guide the clergy and laity along the paths of holiness”! It’s a dogma that men cannot please God, be holy or have sins forgiven without the Catholic faith or outside the Church (Trent; Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam; etc.). According to the apostate Benedict XVI, schism equates to holiness.

Benedict XVI also teaches formal heresy by repeatedly referring to the schismatic leader as “pope” and the true jurisdictional leader of the true Church in his area. According to the apostate Benedict XVI, the schismatic legitimately occupies “the See of St. Mark”. This heresy was condemned in, among others things, Leo XIII’s encyclical Satis Cognitum, which teaches that all such bishops are outside the Church and consequently cannot rule in it. As he does with other schismatics, Benedict XVI also calls this schismatic leader “Holiness”.

Benedict XVI also teaches formal heresy by stating that the deceased schismatic leader, “Pope Shenouda”, was devoted to the Lord, had a flock of faithful entrusted to him, and that his life continues to inspire them. This is a blatant denial of the dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church (extra ecclesiam nulla salus). Benedict XVI also states that the recently deceased schismatic leader is “venerable”.

Among Benedict XVI’s other blasphemies, he asserts that holding a prominent role in a schismatic church is a “high office”. He also declares that the new office of schismatic leadership is a “pastoral ministry”. He prays that the Holy Spirit (The Spirit of Truth) will “sustain” the schismatic leader in his office of promoting schism! He also declares the adherents of schism (“the Orthodox”) to be “the faithful” of God’s Church. As usual, Benedict XVI also mentions his “esteem” for the schismatic leader. Benedict XVI theeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen declares that souls were “entrusted” by God to follow (and be spiritually directed by) this newly-installed schismatic leader. Benedict XVI is nothing more than a complete schismatic antipope posing as a Catholic pope.

[...]

Here, Benedict XVI denies extra ecclesiam nulla salus again by teaching that notorious heretics and schismatics can have eternal rest. Benedict XVI also declares the “holy Orthodox” schismatic leaders to be the jurisdictional leaders of the true Church, wherever in the world they have established schismatic churches. He also says that deceased leaders of schismatic churches were “dedicated servants of the Lord”. He then declares that schismatic churches have “countless martyrs and saints” and that they “sustain and strengthen all of us”. What a heretic!

Tracy Yates #conspiracy #dunning-kruger #fundie #crackpot amazon.com

This book covers everything from creation to the coming Great Deception. It reveals in detail what space aliens actually are, what the mark of the beast actually is, what it will do, and how they are prepping our bodies for it right now.
It shows how the alien deception starts and ends with the Flower of Life that was first discovered on the tomb of Osiris, AKA the Antichrist, and is one of the most common shapes found in crop circles.
It shows how our reality resembles a light based hologram and how this hologram is directly linked to the Torah.
Finally, it describes how all the aforementioned ties together.
Most of this information is new revelation that you won't find anywhere else.
This is a Bible-based book that shows how true science and archaeology confirm the Word of God.

INTRODUCTION
Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. What will be revealed to you in the following pages goes against everything you have been conditioned to believe and is far more bizarre than anything Hollywood could come up with.
The truth revealed in this book will change your world view and reality as you perceive it forever. This is not a conspiracy theory. The following information is based on the most logical explanations based on hard facts and data after thousands of hours of research.
The best way to start is by quoting a few lines from The Matrix and looking at this book as if it were the RED PILL….”This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill the story ends (you close the book now) you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill you stay in wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes….remember, all I am offering is the truth, nothing more.” Shall we begin?

Myra Cook #ufo #fundie #conspiracy amazon.com

According to an ancient biblical book after seventy generations, the fallen Angels were released after 4900 years of imprisonment. These Ancient Aliens came down from the heavens, and were worshiped “As the Gods.” Their children the mythological Nephilim Giants built the megalithic temples, and pyramids that existed before the flood. Man today could not lift the herculean stones that were used. Temples and megalith structures around the world have been found under the water and upon the earth, and are witnesses to this ancient history.
The Fallen Angels were imprisoned and now released…soon to appear are their hybrid children from the Deserts, Valleys and under the Mountains of the earth for the final judgment, the final hour, and coming of the creator god “Jesus.” Those Nephilim Children who were Giants were destroyed in the flood but their DNA existed, and Giants still existed on the Earth after the flood like GOLIATH and other tribes of Giants.
Giant bones of over 35 ft have been excavated by archeologist to be whisked away hidden by others from mainstream news and media. Why? To deceive you. With no connection or foundation in the past, and no reference to perceive the coming Alien Deception in its many forms; a likely candidate you have become; falling prey to an evil wicked plan that spans eternity.
Today these spiritual fallen hosts are creating children again, but they have repackaged themselves as something else.
The Bible makes it clear that Aliens are not from other civilizations, but interplanetary and inter-dimensional spiritual host whose purpose is to deceive those on earth. Will you be deceived, or informed? Will you fall prey to their lies, or seek the Truth?

Tony Perkins #fundie #homophobia joemygod.com

The Fourth of July is a time of national celebration and commemoration. We rejoice in our liberty and remember those who won our freedoms and have preserved them at great cost. Yet underlying these things is a foundation that must remain strong for “liberty and justice for all” to mean anything.

It’s the rule of law. Law that is fair and impartial, consistent and understandable. Without allegiance to the rule of law, we become a nation where those in power can do what they want without accountability. And in this 244th year of our independence, I fear we are on the brink of that happening.

Last month, the court ruled in the case of Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia that the 1964 Civil Rights Act opposing discrimination based on the biological sex of an individual now must mean that “discrimination based on homosexuality or transgender status necessarily entails discrimination based on sex.”

Justice Neil Gorsuch, who wrote these words, even acknowledges in his decision that the meaning of “sex” in 1964 was not even vaguely connected to homosexuality or transgenderism. In his words, the court “proceeds on the assumption that ‘sex’,” in 1964, referred “only to biological distinctions between male and female.”

America has never been a perfect nation and never will be. But with all our problems, we have made tremendous progress in securing the God-given rights we too often take for granted.

But the exercise of those rights will be increasingly diminished and put in jeopardy if Congress refuses to safeguard them and, instead, allows the Supreme Court to rule however its justices prefer, regardless of the text of the Constitution and the law itself.

Lisa Renee #ufo #fundie #crackpot #magick energeticsynthesis.com

Recently, with the powerful Summer Solstice activation that included the transmission of the Emerald Father Son coding which holds the power source for the return of the Solar King Christos archetype for the divine masculine, Guardian projects in the planetary field have included the review and release of blood covenants and bindings made to the Leviathan demon seed through satanic ritual abuse (SRA) methods. The Leviathan demon seed is the spiritual record held in the occult bloodline that is propagated throughout the main 13 Luciferian Cult families. As a result of these recent revelations with the main Luciferian bloodlines perpetuating SRA with the Leviathan races in these death cults, the following information about the Leviathan races is included for gaining more awareness about their history and how they came into power on the earth after the Atlantian Cataclysm. These Fallen entities are connected to the NAA’s long range plan to inhabit the earth through these Luciferian genetic lineages for the purpose of fulfilling the manifestation of the anti-Christ forces to be embodied in the masses, in order to completely control and enslave humanity through the dark Archontic overlords. As it has been said previously, the earth is enduring a time of massive spiritual warfare, and we are all being impacted by this battle now. Pray for all of humanity, open your heart and connect with God and Christos to guide you forward, in every way that you can. GSF Blessings to all.~LR

Joseph Spurgeon #sexist #fundie crosspolitic.com

“In conclusion, let me as a duly ordained pastor and officer in the church of the living God, with all love for the glory of God, the honor of scripture, and the souls of women, say to Aimee Byrd:

Stop what you are doing. Stop seeking to be a teacher in the church. Stop seeking to divide the church with your false teaching. Stop trying to tear down pastors and elders who are opposing your nonsense. Stop dishonoring the fathers in the faith throughout church history. Stop promoting feminism whether first wave or last wave. Stop playing the victim. Stop and be Quiet. Go live a quiet life. Love and submit to your husband. Love your children. And be a keeper at home.

To her husband: Love your wife enough to tell her to shut up.”

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

(commenting on story “Largest Lutheran Denomination in the US Promotes ‘LGBTQIA+’ Inclusion in Church Life”):

Roger Marks:
What do they know that God doesn't? He created male and female, so who invented all these other queer people?

Trilemma:
God created Adam as a male and Eve as a female. After that, humans created humans with much variation which is why we have a small percentage of people who are LGBT.

Roger Marks:
Nearly right, but not quite. Man did not create all the queers, Satan did. He has been trying to muck up God's creation since day one and whilst he is making some inroads with his distortion of humanity, he still has a long way to go because all those queers are such a small minority.
I guess we should not be surprised if the number increases as homosexulaity is a product of dysfunctional families and quite a few of them are beign produced.

Jack Hyles / Andrew Schlafly #fundie #sexist conservapedia.com

Pastor Jack Hyles wrote:

We are facing a concentrated effort in this nation to try to de-emphasize the difference between the sexes. People ask, “Brother Hyles, are you opposed to this or that?” I’ll answer this way: You can name anything you want to name, but I am opposed to anything in the world that de-emphasizes the line of difference between the sexes. I believe that ladies ought to be feminine and sweet and lovely and charming. I believe men ought to be strong and masculine and decisive. I’m opposed to anything that makes a man and a woman act alike, look alike, dress alike, or talk alike.

A "woman against feminism" wrote:

With their complementary roles, the visionary husband and wife don't walk in opposite directions with differing agendas. They unite their hearts and minds and work toward the same goals, each in their own God-ordained sphere.

Andrew Schlafly #fundie conservapedia.com

Fundamentalism is one of four major branches within Protestantism, the other three being mainline, evangelical, and Pentecostal. However, the term itself is sometimes used in a pejorative way today by liberal bigots to describe any Christian individual or group that opposes liberal Christianity.

Stan Chappas #conspiracy #fundie #quack youtube.com

pizzaGate. Hillary Clintons campaign manager and former staff of Bill Clinton (John Podesta) emails were hacked, they used cryptic talk words like pizza and ice cream referring to little kids. You have to make the decision yourself if u believe this is true. Me personally the evidence is clear especially epstein's molestation of kids and the elite who traveled to his island. Sealed that fact then ofcourse his mysterious death... Anyways john podestas emails were full of this cryptic talk. Also ever hear of spirit cooking? Marina Abromovic was emailing him asking if his family was coming over for the spirit cooking.(youtube all this for your own judgement) But she is worshipped by many celebs and funded by elites of the likes of Bill Gates. It is really sad and disgusting and a true pedophilia ring. Also Covid 19 is it, it will not get better from this point unless we the people overthrow our worlds tyrannical governments. Alex Jones has some good messages but he make people who know the truth look bad. The truth is out there its just what do u personally accept. Im a believer in Christ, and the bible shows the things to come and all of the New World Order so called "conspiracy" is in the new testament (king james version). But if you are questioning things good i can point you in a direction but once your down the rabbit hole your down down down.... The federal reserve (is not federal and USA lost its power when we accepted a centralized bank), JFK assasination (he tried to rid the federal reserve) operation paperclip( we brought nazis to america to work on government projects) The Rockefeller family, the rothchild family, The astor family, 13 bloodlines of the illuminati (first hand evidence can find George Washington's letter about the illuminati google that to pull up goventments library of congress website for his authentic letter, Bill gates and id2020.org and how id2020 had a summit with merging digital id with vaccinations look at the offical website of id2020 will see GAVI the vaccine Alliance, Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft funds it, cryptocurrency bitcoin funds it (its happening right now from covid19 the petrodollar has collapsed and digital currency in vaccination form is transpiring articles on the summit that joined digital currency with vaccination)then you will find agenda 2030 mandated id2020, Bilderberg committe, council of foreign relations, trilateral commision, baphomet worship, satanic symbols of celebrities, the scientific research of cern, the roman catholic church, pizzagate, united nations (agendas 21&2030), george soros, the world trade center conspiracy, the freedom act and the patriot act, the bush family and John Kerry and many more in the frat Skull and Bones at Yale University, 5g. Conspiracy and the amount of gigahertz 5g uses compared to 4g and the harmful effects of gigahertz, the lies of historical science(trying to disprove God).....all of this is linked and all of it is the same big ugly truth its just do you want to go down that rabbit hole and have eyes wide open? They are admitted satanist and worship evil. They run the world and they are pedophiles which is a part of satanism. They have always wanted to have a one world government and one world currency( is in our holy bible this will happen) and depopulation it is here.... henry kissinger, david rockefeller, and the united nations have been pushing this and now its here thanks to Covid19. Obamas chief of staff once said dont ever let a crisis go to waste....obama administration funded wuhan lab 3.7 million dollars all on record. All of this ive mentioned is documented you personally just have to look it up. By the way this year zero album was made in 2007 Trent Reznor made this album for what he saw the world would be in the 2020's scary right? He made a interview for year zero album explaining it (its on youtube). Hope i can relay info ive read not from conspiracy but from documents and factual evidence whether looking up official sites, documented operations of government, recorded or videotapped footag, records of the library of Congress' website. Im writing all of this because people who want to know need to know, and ive spent years finding facts not a dog chasing his own tail. Thanks for reading goodluck and God bless.

Jonathan Waller #fundie patheos.com

(commenting on Bob Seidensticker’s article “And God Is Not Good, Either”)

Hi Bob. Thanks for your in-depth study about the goodness of God.
You have certainly done your research. However, your entire premise has
one major flaw. None of us can agree on what "good" actually is. Every single person has a different definition of what "good" is.

For example, one person might say it's not "good" for two men to marry. Another person might say that it's not "good" to try and keep two people who love each other apart. Thus, the definition of "good" is relative depending on whom
you're talking with. Because of this discrepancy, like it or not, we have to go to the ultimate authority on what is "good".

God might not fit your mold of what is "good", but the beauty of it all is that He doesn't have to. God is sovereign; meaning God has authority over you, not the other way around. You will answer to God, God will never answer to you.

I would challenge you to carefully consider what it will be like when we all stand before judgment. If you think you will have an opportunity to accuse God of anything, you are mistaken. Every time someone in scripture comes in contact with God, they fall on their face and tremble in terror. They can't even move unless God gives them permission to do so. There won't be a time when God is on trial.

I don't like several laws that I have to obey. I don't like having to slow down to 35 miles per hour in a school zone when the school is 4 blocks away from the highway where the lights are flashing. But, if there is a sign posted and lights flashing, I'm still subject to obey the law, whether I agree with the law or not.

God is good, all the time and all the time God is good. Not because we say so, but because He says so. The sooner you realize that, the better off you will be.

Maybe you have a hard time submitting to a God that doesn't answer to your set of moral standards. If you've read the book of Genesis, you know that's exactly what happened to Adam and Eve. They didn't feel that it was "good" that God withheld from them what they wanted. That, sir, is why we have to deal with injustice in the world. Man is imperfect because God gave them a choice as to which tree they would eat from. The tree of life, or the tree death. They chose death. God could have stopped it, but he didn't. He chose to give us free will. In other words, God gave you the choice to accuse Him of all the things you're accusing Him of. Don't you think that's "good"?

On several occasions, I've sat and wondered why in the world Adam and Eve chose to disobey God. The Bible says they walked with God daily in the garden. What an incredible opportunity! Yet they still disobeyed God and tasted the forbidden fruit. But then again, You and I are guilty of the same thing. God has set before us the tree of life, and the tree of death. We can choose to accept Christ and live, or reject Christ and die. In short, we have an opportunity to walk with God in the garden to. Unfortunately, many people reject this opportunity because God isn't they way they want Him to be.

Which, on a side note, you most likely don't agree that Adam & Eve were real people, however, Jesus himself believed that they were. And, if a guy can raise himself from the dead, I'll believe everything that guy says. If you don't believe this either, you should do an in-depth study on this topic with former atheists that tried to disprove it.

In conclusion, instead of spending time researching how God isn't good, you should have spent time researching how God isn't fair. If you want to spend time researching this topic you will have more than enough evidence to make a solid point. If you need help, let me give you a point of origin for your study. Start at the foot of the Cross where God sent his son to die for your sins. That certainly wasn't fair. But then again, God is God, and he can do whatever he wants. Including raising from the dead three days later.

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child #fundie #wingnut 3edgesword.blogspot.com

[OP of "Why is the new Alberta Lieutenant-Governor evil?"]

Who's bright idea was it to choose a Lieutenant-Governor who worships Mohammed, the child raping fake prophet who worships Satan the enemy of the one true Lord?

This scum, after all, has been promoting the great funamental evils of public healthcare and education. And of course she's been involved with the Aga Khan...

Remember the immortal words of Kate McMillan: the great thing about only hiring old white guys is that you don't have to be labelled when you fire them.

Next page