The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters
This is a psyop to make you gay
“Muscle mommy” fetish is literally homosexuality
First it was the vax
Then they got TikTok brain kids to goon over these “women”
If you have ever found yourself attracted to this you desperately need to raise your test levels.
Sex is for making children.
Any man who has sex with women because it “feels good” is gay.
Oh my pee pee feels good this is great!
In fact if you are 40 with less then 5 children you’re probably gay.
All that feel-good pee pee sex and hardly any genetic legacy?
[From “France: “Liberated” Moslem Teen Thot Gets Patrolled by Classmates, Ends Up in a Coma”]
In Islam, you cannot slut it up and face no consequences
This is why they don’t have feminism: if a woman tries feminism, she ends up in a coma
It might seem hardcore
But what women have done to the Western world is a lot more hardcore than this
[url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/04/girl-14-left-in-coma-after-attack-by-teenagers-outside-school-in-france]The Guardian[/ur]
The French government has launched an urgent investigation after a 14-year-old girl was severely wounded and left in a coma after being beaten outside her school by three other teenagers in the south of France[…]
Her mother, Hassiba, said in media interviews that her daughter had been bullied by a fellow pupil for two and a half years, raising the possibility this could have been over her behaviour and clothing being deemed un-Islamic[…]
It sounds like people don’t appreciate that
Maybe as her mother, it was your responsibility to tell her not to wear slut clothes?
Maybe this is your fault?
Oh yes! Females custodians! Add wokism in 40k to tell us we must like it!
(By the way have you seen the recents black s library books? Stories of astra militarium, of course, with courageous and braves FEMALES guards. )
Seriously always the same shit: Trying to make us believe "womyns" can do the same things than men, and even, they can do it BETTER.
Oh yes feminists and wokes, you are so badass.
So badass, i can't wait to see liberals libertarians with green hairs- their-prunumis-They/them, who will enlist in armies of westerns countries.
You want to remember the reality? In Europe, the military service was an obligation for every YOUNG MEN, until the 90's.
But not for WOMEN.
Have you heard feminists complaining about it?
And now, just imagine that, with all the mess there are in the world today.
What could happen, if military service, is re-established in western Europe countries?
What if young men MUST be present in caserns when their studies are over?
If that happen, i'm courious to see how somes peoples, so happy to see "strong females characters" , "gender-fluids heroes", or "heroes from diversity" in movies and comics, will react.
I'm sure they will gladly enlist them/shem/theirselves to serve their country, to doing the same things they see in theatres.
Do you wonder why “progressive” (i.e. batshit crazy) elite class women seem so unperturbed about the conspicuous number of rapes committed by “newcomers,” as they style illegal border-jumpers these days, who are by an overwhelming percentage “military-age men”? Because, having functionally transformed the ranks of American men into eunuchs, they relish the arrival of so many wild and lustful fellows on the scene, as long as — post the imagined bodice-ripping exploits — they can be dominated and domesticated into so many swimming pool cleaners and busboys to be ordered around.
Of course, much of that archetypal psychodrama is only played out in the batshit crazy mind of batshit crazy women; for the sake of decorum it is never acted-out. The lurid, shameful fantasies are instead displaced onto Donald Trump, the archetypal “Big Daddy” who so insolently evaded the castration shears of Hillary Clinton
<...>
It is the way of Homo sapiens that moral codes derive generally from the supervision of fathers in the upbringing of human young and, later on, as children develop into adults, these codes are archetypally re-enacted and enforced by men in the greater social matrix. Why? Because it requires a strong sense of boundaries. Boundaries are the essence of the “patriarchy.” Remove men from the scene, or castrate them politically, and you are sure to end up with a problem knowing right from wrong. We’re apparently subject now to the misrule of women with boundary problems who rebelled against Daddy and never got over it. It’s a peculiar irony — so far unexplicated by the hierophants of social theory — that the more affluent and successful Daddy was, the more he was hated for it by his female offspring.
The result of all that is the Democratic Party of our time as run by the batshit crazy women, fearful of sex and its consequence (babies), paradoxically subject to biological promptings and unable to find suitable mates among the men they’ve turned into eunuchs.
I believe many, many more men are secretly paedophiles than we actually think. One of the most, if not the most popular porn categories is 'freshly turned 18'. Do people really believe these men's attractions start the day girls turn 18? Of course not, if they're attracted to 18 they're most likely attracted to 17, 16 and so on
Jesus and My Gender: Affirming Your Child's God-Given Gender
In this rhyming book for children ages 3-10, pastor Dale Partridge masterfully lays out a cohesive theological presentation of biblical gender. The content of each page is supported by Scripture references and, at the end of the book, is a 5-question biblical catechism to instill these truths in the minds of young people.
Before the creation of the world, God designed boys and girls.
God said boys and girls are equal, before their lord in soul, but they were made uniquely, with completely different roles.
The crown of girls is quickly seen when people start comparing - a special privilege given them: the blessing of childbearing. The female body is extraordinary, the boys cannot relate. The girls can carry babies amd nurture those they make.
He built his boys for rough and play, just how they ought to be. They’d pounce and battle for the day, and even jump from trees! He made them strong to guard their friends, to protect the weak, and make amends.
(trying to argue that the term “femboy,” even when used by and about cis men, is transphobic)
Enter femboys. Femboys often look exactly like the standard trap — a very young, semi-androgynous, flat-chested, thin, white anime girl — though they’re frequently depicted even more salaciously because the artist has no reason to “conceal their masculine traits,” instead drawing attention to their genitals.
The default reasoning people use as to why this concept isn’t transmisogynistic is that femboys are gender-nonconforming boys who aren’t trying to trick anyone into believing that they’re girls. […] However, this argument completely ignores that half of the issue with traps and futanari is that they are a fetish. In every instance, a great deal of emphasis is placed on the penis — it’s shocking and unexpected; it’s connotative of a cis boy in disguise; it’s accentuation goes hand-in-hand with male femininity, designating male femininity as inherently erotic. […]
This is what you’re contributing to when you normalize the fetishization of “femboys,” the fetishization of the juxtaposition between a feminine presentation with a so-called “masculine” biology.
Foids stabbed to death in Bondi Australia (chad/stacy jew capital)
Some guys stabbed 4 people in a shopping centre in Bondi, Australia. Bondi is a rich Jew area of Sydney, it's also near the beach where chads and stacies hang out.
There were 2 other stabbings which I think were related. A 36 year old foid was stabbed in the head at bondi beach at the same time, then there was the stabbings in Bondi shopping centre. The shopping centre is right next to a kike synagogue.
I suspect it is a mujahideen cell targeting kuffar and kikes, based on the area. May Allah accept the mujahedeen as shahid.
I love the fact that the guy targeted an upmarket shopping centre (someone told me it was a fashion/markup/designer type thing) where only foids will be shopping.
Would anyone be interested in a protest at Ubisoft headquarters?
This entire situation is taking a huge emotional toll on this community and I think we should do something positive about it. Beautiful women have historically viewed men like us as “weird” and “creepy” so beautiful women in games have been our refuge and now that’s being taken away from us. Would anyone else be interested a peaceful March on Ubisoft or Disney headquarters?
I’ve also been thinking of doing a hunger strike in protest of woke cultural vandalism but I’m not gonna ask other people to join me.
Feminism doesn’t empower women. It erases them.
The bestselling author of Theology of Home, Carrie Gress shows that fifty years of radical feminism have solidified the primacy of the traditionally male sphere of life and devalued the attributes, virtues, and strengths of women.
Feminism, the ideology dedicated to "smashing the patriarchy," has instead made male lives the norm for everyone. After fifty years of radical feminism, we can’t even define "woman." In this powerful new book, Carrie Gress says what cannot be said: feminism has abolished women.
Hulking "trans women" thrash female athletes. Mothers abort their baby girls. Drag queens perform obscene parodies of women. Females are enslaved for men's pleasure—or they enslave themselves. Feminism doesn’t avert these tragedies; it encourages them. The carefree binge of self-absorption has left women exploited, unhappy, dependent on the state, and at war with men. And still, feminists cling to their illusions of liberation.
But there are real answers. Real answers for real women. Carrie Gress—a wife, mother, and philosopher—punctures the myth of feminism, exposing its legacy of abuse, abandonment, and anarchy. From the serpent’s seduction of Eve to Mary Shelley's Frankenstein to Kate Millett’s lust, violence, and insanity to Meghan Markle’s havoc-ridden rise to royalty, Gress presents a history as intriguing as the characters who lived it. The answers women most desperately need, she concludes, are to be found precisely where they are most afraid to look.
Only a rediscovery of true womanhood—and motherhood—can pull our society back from the brink. And happiness is possible only if women are open to making peace with men, with children, with God, and—no less difficult—with themselves. For feminism’s victims, Gress is a welcoming voice in the darkness: The door is open. The lights are on. Come home.
for the last time men can not be r*ped by women. how often does it need to be said? nothing a woman does could ever be considered r*pe. any action against a man is justifiable and to draw a moral equivalence is dumb as fuck. the debate around "male victims" is designed to dilute the severity of the historic destruction of womanhood by male cultural hegemony
#radfems do touch #terfs do interact #terf safe #rapeculture
Anytime a women shows her emotions it is used against her people say stuff like "is it that time of the month", This is why women can't become leaders or be president", now these males say that when we cry and express our emotions that it is used against black men somehow even tho no one is being physically harmed by someone crying unlike when black males use aggression to get what they want. Such as in mongomary brawl where a black man hit a white women in the face with a metal folding chair over a dispute about a dockside parking spot because he didn't get the parking spot he wants and all the liberals and black men defended him and he didn't even get jail time. Another example would be about the black man who went around NYC and punched a bunch of white women of the head and even chipped a womens tooth and gave another women a concussion.
Then these black males have the audacity to call women Karen's because she called the police on them because she is scared for her safety.
What is more dangerous a women crying or a man who violently hurts women according to all the black men and liberals its women crying.
If black males care so much about racism why don't they attack white men that would make the most sense because they have the most power. The reason why they don't do that is because there misogynistic and they hate women even women of there own race look at how they treat black women. I doubt that most of them even cares about racism and they just care about attacking women.
Most homeless men are r*pist
Alot of homeless men can't maintain a job or even get one because they can't control there sexual desire. They would stare at women on the street they would grope women and even r*pe women yet women are expected to feel sympathy for them and were expected to donate money to them. Most people who donate to charities are women yet were blamed for male homelessness and male homelessness statistics are used to gaslight women and keep us quite about our issues.
70% of homeless people are male meaning that most of my tax money goes to men. Most of my money goes to funding rapist on the street but I'm considered a greedy bitch if I don't think pads and tampons should be tax.
[…]
Removing God, introducing modern hedonism, and bringing equality into the marriage has led to disastrous consequences. Generation Z women have fallen for three scams introduced by Satan and his minions:
You will be well served by living your life, searching for what feels good and experiencing that to its fullest.
[…]
If you have read our article on Feminism, you will know that the data is in, and its conclusion is undeniable. The way women are choosing to live their lives in the modern world is not making them happy. Women’s happiness is in terminal decline in the modern world of equality.
When we counsel women in our marriage counselling courses, we find the same pattern over and over,
Women who are married and are responsible for the provision of the home have increased anxiety or stress compared with women who have a strong Godly male provider.
Women who are financially responsible for the household are less happy than women who have a husband that is financially responsible for the household.
Women who stay at home and care for young children have increased happiness compared with women who have careers and leave their children to daycare.
Overall, this fallacy that men and women are equal, and that women should have like for like careers and lifestyles as men do is destroying female happiness!
[…]
Vashti is a well-known woman of pride. She was too big to obey her husband. As the scripture predicts, she fell from her high position of being the First Lady. Vashti was never heard of again. Is that what you want to happen to you? Not obeying a husband is a sign that you are like Vashti and therefore it is a sign that you are proud.
I sent a missionary to a foreign country. When he married his wife, she was a nice, sweet, obedient little girl. Through the blessings of God, she gave birth to a number of children.
Finally, when her womb was full she declared, “I will not go to the mission field any more. I have had enough. I am fed up. It is over.”
She told her husband, “I am not coming.”
This young lady had now grown wings and had become too big and too resistant to obey her husband.
This is a good example of pride. This young lady would not have behaved like this some years earlier.
On the seventh day, when the heart of the king was merry with wine, he commanded the seven chamberlains that served in the presence of Ahasuerus the king, To bring Vashti the queen before the king with the crown royal, to shew the people and the princes her beauty: for she was fair to look on. BUT THE QUEEN VASHTI REFUSED TO COME AT THE KING’S COMMANDMENT by his chamberlains:
Vashti was hard, stubborn and unyielding. Perhaps, when the king first chose her to be his queen she came running, willing to do anything and everything. But today, she could not be moved! Watch out for those hardened resistant women with the spirit of Vashti.
A woman who never bends, never yields, is never gracious, never flows and never agrees, is just another proud Vashti.
How is it that you can never change your mind? What is the use of a mind if it cannot be changed? Indeed, you may say, “Who am I? I am a humble servant of God. But your stubbornness and resistance to change reveals that you are actually proud and puffed up. You proclaim your goodness and call yourself a daughter of destiny. But you are just like Vashti who could not be moved around by her husband.
hey say "Some people don't know the value of what they have until they lose it." And that's the unfortunate case of some people today.
For some days now, the Book of Esther has been ringing in me, but one part that's striking is that of Queen Vashti. Now Queen Vashti was beautiful alright, equipped with all that it takes to take care of the kingdom of Persia along with her (then) husband King Ahasuerus; but her character not only disregarded and devalued the king, it also got her dethroned as queen, and was later replaced by Esther.
The point is this: my dear fellow sisters in Christ (especially those of you who are in courtship or engaged or even married), cherish the man that God has given to you, don't disregard him in any way, shape or form. Because the day/minute you do so (via impatience, materialism, even through your character o), it smells trouble; and if you don't mend your ways, in due time, you will be replaced.
Likewise the brothers, the woman God has given to you, do not devalue nor take her for granted in any way. Because if you keep disregarding your lady, God will just send somebody else to take your place o.
I remember watching a very powerful @mztelevision movie called "The Ignition", which explains the danger of disregarding the person God has given to you (through impatience in this case).
This one of the painful ways some sisters (and some brothers) miss out on God's perfect will in marriage.
May this never be your lot, in Jesus' Name.
I grew up in the Leave It To Beaver era.
Men were men and women were women.
I had "It's a man's world" drummed into me.
My mom never had a driver's license.
Then came women's lib, equal opportunity, reverse discrimination, NOW, and all this other balogna.
And while I hold two women up in high esteem (Rosa Parks & Frances Kelsey), I've seen my share of women arcing & sparking and singing songs like "Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better" and "I Am Woman" and other junk.
I love the story of the man who held a door open for a woman, and she stopped and refused to go in, calling him a "male chauvinist."
To which he replied, "I'm not holding the door because you're a woman. I'm holding the door because I'm a man."
My older sister got into the women's lib movement as a teenager, and it was all I could do to put up with her nonsense.
A woman is a satanic beast, the embodiment of why you yourself have to be as cruel as possible in a dog-eat-dog world.
She can't be allowed anything. I would love a clip of someone being handshook by a woman, then she hugs another guy, and the guy who got the handshake immediately turns into Jon Jones when he was shoved during a staredown.
If she isn't perfect towards you, she is an enemy. Not even someone to be punished, downright an enemy.
The Patriarch is a good thing, and it forms the proper hierarchy for marriage”
[…]
Ask any worldly woman today what they want, and you’ll hear something like this list,
Equality
Equal Pay
A Career
Equal say in the marriage
Respect
The irony is that is not what is going on inside. I don’t know this because I am a genius, nor do I know this because I claim to know women, I know this because God tells me so.
* Genesis 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
The word desire H8669 tᵊšûqâ or תְּשׁוּקָה means,
1. desire, longing, craving
2. of man for woman
3. of beast to devour
The words shall rule over thee H4910 māšal or מָשַׁל means,
1. to rule, have dominion, reign
2. to rule, have dominion
3. to cause to rule
4. to exercise dominion
It is then very clear, that inside every female on the planet today we should find a desire that a strong, masculine dominant authority lead over her.
Don’t believe me? Let’s continue and prove it!
A Sexual Revelation
On Thursday the 12th of February 2015 a movie called “Fifty Shades of Grey” was released to cinemas all over the world. According to the feminist manifesto the events and data that followed are completely unexplainable. The movie,
* Is the 4th highest grossing R rated film of all time.
* Had the largest grossing first week of ticket sales of all time.
* Grossed 569.7 million Dollars as the 10th highest R rated film of all time.
* Women comprised of 82.6% of total audiences during its first week.
Here was a movie about a man dominating a woman, and women were its overwhelming audience.[…] The Patriarch is not and was never meant to be Tyrannical! There is no other way to put this, God installed the man as the head of the woman in marriage. What God did not do is install the man as a harsh or unjust manager. Please see our pages on leadership and submission for more on this.[…]
At its foundation feminism has taught the male,
* That he is not the leader of his home
* That he is not solely responsible for his home, wife and children
* That he should not use his inner desire to be strong for his family unit
* That he should not be dominant
* That he is not be the provider of the home
How then should men act in this brave new world? How do they be who they were created to be when everything about them is challenged?
Slut. Men are just sick and tired of not even having the OPTION of marrying virgins. Men are expected to bust their ass, be wealthy, and have top tier genetics for what? A single mom with 2 baby daddies? It has nothing to do with feeling small. Used pussy is not attractive. Sorry you bought into feminism hype and no real man wants you now. You can fuck all the guys you want, but you and I both know you’ll never find a man you actually like/respect to love you back because you’re a used up wh0re. You keep getting pumped and dumped and it angers you so much. That’s why you hate me. I remind you of every man who fucked the shit out of you and ghosted you the next day.
They were taught propaganda that equated marriage with slavery by radical feminists!
Feminism is an ideology of decline.
The so-called “liberation” of women from masculine authority means the destruction of civilized life. Feminism is the ideological and spiritual commitment to returning mankind to the primitive conditions of slavery, fear, and superstition that characterize the most common lot of human beings.
In the West alone, the spirit of science, conquest, and philosophy propelled a portion of mankind out of the primordial ooze of mere life and bare survival. This spirit was intrinsically and decisively masculine.
<...>
A compromise between the forces that built civilization and those that want to tear it down is impossible.
Today, 1.5 million American women have become OnlyFans camwhores. 40% of American children are born out of wedlock. 33% of Americans under the age of 25 identify as LGBTQ+. 50% of American marriages end in divorce.
<...>
No-fault divorce, abortion on demand, and loosening sexual morality make this world of home and hearth increasingly out of reach for millions of men and women alike. For a culture to promote marriage and family, it needs to shame slutty women, protect male wages, and defend the legal right of fathers to serve as the legal and de facto heads of their households.
<...>
The differences between the sexes are natural, and they are serious. A functioning political order must take account of humankind’s fundamental sexual dimorphism.
Women have a single overpowering virtue that dwarfs all others they possess: they can nurture life within their own bodies. Women are gateways to the future. They carry the germ and genius of the species in their wombs. Without pregnancy, mankind would die out.
<...>
Man has greater physical, intellectual, and spiritual potential than his female counterpart, but he is not life-giving in the same way. Man is a more sterile being than woman.
Laura Loomer recently targeted the daughter of Judge Juan Merchan[…]Loomer falsely claimed that Merchan’s daughter, Loren, operated an anti-Trump X account — a smear that Trump himself repeated. After her claim was debunked, however, Loomer doubled down, attacking female journalists in racist and misogynistic terms[…]
In a bitter, misogynistic rant, Loomer repeatedly referred to Haberman as a “bitch” and a “cunt,” and accused her of costing her a dream job with the Trump campaign:
A lot of you don’t know who Maggie Haberman is. Okay? She’s a bitch. That’s all you need to know. Okay? She’s a talentless anti-Trump bitch. And I would be working for President Trump right now if it wasn’t for that nasty hit piece, right?
And, as many of you know, President Trump hired me in his office in March of 2023. He was very impressed by my investigations into Ron DeSanctimonious. And he called me one day and he said “I wanna meet you. I think you’re amazing. You’re very talented. I think that you are destroying Ron DeSantis. Come to Mar-a-Lago”[…]
And he’s saying this openly in the office in front of everybody, right? Everybody could hear it. I mean, I dunno, maybe some people got jealous. I don’t know. But that’s not my problem, right? It’s not my fault. It’s not my fault I’m good at what I doSo President Trump starts talking and he goes “Wow Laura you’re just so brilliant”[…]
And then all of the sudden this one morning I get a phone call in April from Jonathan Swann and Maggie Haberman of The New York Times[…]
Like[…]— I just think this woman is one of the most disgusting women on this planet, Maggie Haberman. And she’s gonna get the karma that she deserves someday[…]Hopefully she gets laid off and she’s homeless[…]
It’s tortious interference what she did[…]
Loomer also said that the reason Haberman doesn’t use her husband’s last name professionally is so they can “hide the fact that they’re married”[…]
“Because it allows them to deceive the public”
The final and most brutal blackpill of all is that women aren't attracted to men
Chad isn't just a highly "above average" man, he's some sort of hyperborean intersex angel with tall height and big dick, but
- Tall isn't a male trait, being tallER-than-foids is, but foids aren't content with that they want TALL
- Big dick isn't a male trait, having a dick is, the size of it is irrelevant to the authenticity of gender
- The face of a Greek God with prominent facial bones isn't a male trait, it's a Greek God trait
- Making a lot of money isn't a male trait, it's the trait of an species called "rich man"
- Being muscular isn't a male trait, it's the trait of roided bodybuilders
- Having a mogger warrior skull isn't a male trait, it's a trait of 0.000001% of men
- Having an exaggerated triangular body shape isn't a male trait, it's the trait of 0.0000001% of men
- Being a psychopath isn't a male trait, it's a psychopath trait
Some desired traits in men are even fundamentally anti-male, like not having too much body hair and not balding, and having a "pretty" face
On the other hand, men desire traits that are present in MOST women, like wide hips, boobs, long hair, XX chromosome, vagina
"Sub8", "80/20 rule", "hypergamy", "Chad only", etc are all just symptoms of a much bigger issue: women just don't like male bodies, they like some glorified superhuman version of it, men can't aspire to be a "man" to be sexually attractive while women only need to be a "woman" to be sexually attractive
On the scale of 0-10 on how much different people like male bodies: straight men and lesbian women are 0, straight women are 2 MAX, gay men are 5
On the scale of 0-10 on how much different people like female bodies: straight men and lesbian women are 10, straight women are 9, gay men are 8
This is the root cause of the blackpill
[From “Return of Justice: Taliban Reintroduce Public Stoning and Flogging of Women”]
After losing a war they spent twenty years fighting with a humiliating surrender, the US tried to claim “yeah, but at least the Taliban will be more liberal now that we’ve influenced the country with our values of democracy”[…]
Actually, they’re just picking up where they left off
Because traditional Islam is traditionalist, meaning it doesn’t change because the year changes and the latest cellphone upgrade is released
The Guardian[…]
To refer to this as “women” returning to the “darkest days” implies all women are whores and therefore going to get stoned
In fact, when you stone women for being whores, very few women are whores[…]They get married to older men when they are 14, and don’t have sex with another man, ever, unless their husband dies and they get remarried[…]
I hate to say it: but what about men’s rights?
Don’t men have a right to live in a society that is not being destroyed by out-of-control slut women?[…]
“[But] I represent Allah, and you represent Satan”
So true
Reminder: Western media will typically translate “Allah” as “God” – except in cases where they want Moslems to look very alien and backward[…]
It may sound wrong, given that they are technologically very primitive, but it is true: the Taliban is the future
The only societies that are going to survive into the future are the ones that put very strict sanctions on women. Everywhere else, people will simply stop breeding
The Taliban will survive, the Amish will survive. Various other Islamic groups will survive, but I can’t think of any other extant Christian groups that are likely to survive if they do not seriously alter their views on women and start smashing these bitches’ heads in with rocks when they go rogue
Interracial marriage and dating should be illegal
White men are entitled to white women.
Brown men are entitled to brown women.
Black men are entitled to black women.
Asian men are entitled to Asian women.
Imagine if interracial dating and marriage was banned, no group of men will be deprived of women because they are sticking to their own kind. I don't see anything wrong with this idea because asian men will finally be able to mate with women of their own race, they won't have to worry about their women Being stolen by white chads or Tyrones. It's fair. There will be no racial conflicts. All races will live in peace
Why foid genitals mutilation is necessary for civilization to function properly
By their roastbeefs not being mutilated comes unleashed barbaric foid nature which leads to hypergamy and other degenerations. As we can see today, giving foids any power results in decay of entire nations and downfall in every aspect. Their troglodytic attitude is destructive towards any form of greater community, since it's a obstacle to human progress. By mutilating their genitals, human race supervise that foid cattle won't have opportunity to sabotage existence of civilization. All of their power comes from having monopoly over 'their' bodies and when it's taken away, then all of their might used to oppress nonchads suddenly disappears. It's the only way to make sure that humanity is safe from decay caused by hypergamy.
men are literally so awful and disgusting and depraved and honestly not even human that so many of them are pretending to women and tanking our fucking violent crime stats, making it look like women are getting more violent.
nah. just more freak degenerate males who are useless flesh bags calling themselves girls -eye roll-
Women's Feelings Vs Honor And Virtue
Why isn't Honor and Virtue the most important thing to women? It's because their feelings are more important to them than anything, and men aren't people unless they're attracted to them or their brother. XD
Taliban edict to resume stoning women to death met with horror
The Taliban’s announcement that it is resuming publicly stoning women to death has been enabled by the international community’s silence, human rights groups have said.
The Taliban’s supreme leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, announced at the weekend that the group would begin enforcing its interpretation of sharia law in Afghanistan, including reintroducing the public flogging and stoning of women for adultery.
In an audio broadcast on the Taliban-controlled Radio Television Afghanistan last Saturday, Akhundzada said: “We will flog the women … we will stone them to death in public [for adultery].
“You may call it a violation of women’s rights when we publicly stone or flog them for committing adultery because they conflict with your democratic principles,” he said, adding: “[But] I represent Allah, and you represent Satan.”
He justified the move as a continuation of the Taliban’s struggle against western influences. “The Taliban’s work did not end with the takeover of Kabul, it has only just begun,” he said.
In the past year alone, Taliban-appointed judges ordered 417 public floggings and executions, according to Afghan Witness, a research group monitoring human rights in Afghanistan. Of these, 57 were women.
Most recently, in February, the Taliban executed people in public at stadiums in Jawzjan and Ghazni provinces. The militant group has urged people to attend executions and punishments as a “lesson” but banned filming or photography.
West Yorkshire police are investigating “racist comments which were allegedly made at a meeting” by the Conservative [biggest ever] donor Frank Hester in 2019.
The investigation was triggered after the Guardian reported that Hester, a businessman based in Leeds, told colleagues that looking at Diane Abbott made you “want to hate all black women” and said the MP “should be shot”.
Hester, who has given £10m to the Tories in the past year, said in the meeting that he did not hate all black women. But he did say that seeing Abbott, who is Britain’s longest-serving black MP, on TV meant “you just want to hate all black women because she’s there”.
After the publication of the remarks, a statement from TPP said Hester “accepts that he was rude about Diane Abbott in a private meeting several years ago but his criticism had nothing to do with her gender nor colour of skin”. The statement said Hester abhorred racism, “not least because he experienced it as the child of Irish immigrants in the 1970s”.
(Comment referring to feminism)
It was always about dividing the family and the relationship that a man and woman had along centuries.
[From ““Psychopathy Far More Common Among Women Than Previously Thought””]
I don’t understand the concept of a “woman psychopath”
All basic female behavioral traits line up with the definitions of psychopathy. They don’t feel guilt or remorse of any kind, and they only act in self-interest, and will lie and manipulate to get what they want
That’s all women
When it comes to a typical psychopath, the suited and booted Patrick Bateman from the novel American Psycho might spring to mind, but, according to one expert, the number of women with the neuropsychiatric disorder could be far greater than previously thought[…]
It’s not just white liberal women, by the way[…]
Ask white conservative slut Boebert, who was jacking off her new boyfriend in the theater after abandoning her husband
Ask the South Korean whores
Women are just women
White women are the worst, except for obviously blacks, but women are all just natural “psychopaths,” if you have a yearning to use that term
I don’t think it’s a useful term
I also don’t want to hear about the “dark triad”
Mostly, I just want to talk about Jews, and how they can be completely exterminated, possibly with a bioweapon
It is well known in ancient literature that the “clitoris” didn’t exist. What the “clitoris” is is an invention of modern feminism, which has been trying to give women their own “penis” and socially engineering them into believing they need to have a “clitoral orgasm”. All a lie.
Aimee Terese:
“Men who eat pussy are spiritual lesbians”
Glypticfille:
“There is likely a direct correlation between men who do this (99% of leftist men) and modern leftism. It is my suspicion that there is something in the vaginal fluids that is capable of estrogenising the body, cuckolding the spirit, hence thousand year prohibition against it.”
[From “The End of Liberalism”]
The satanic seeds of the Enlightenment have finally blossomed to the point that they are killing entire nations. We’ve already learned, much to our surprise, that Communism is less fatal to a nation than the financial capitalism, neo-liberalism, and globalism of Clown World, now we’re discovering that even the insane ideology of the Juche, the state ideology of North Korea, is observably better for a nation than the best that the modern West has to offer
I think it’s so funny that Korean women are so done with Korean men that they’re literally just deciding to die out. Y’all heard of the 4B movement[…]
She says that Korean women are mad at Korean men, but they’re actually mad at God, and if you don’t like that word, just call it the universe[…]
What these women are saying is I want resources and money and power and everything, I just don’t want to provide men with what they need in order to continue creating them[…]
Korea has the lowest birthrates in the world but I just think that’s so funny… Korean as an ethnicity is about to go away. It works the same every time you fill your mind with entitlement, you blame somebody for what you don’t have, and then you use the government to take it away from them
Except Korea will not die. The Korea that will survive is Best Korea. Scientific, evolutionarily-superior Korea. It’s very unlikely that South Korean women will be permitted to simply die off and end Korean civilization, the odds significantly favor them instead being enslaved and utilized by the North Koreans to ensure national survival. And the great irony is that these women will apparently be happier as slaves than as free women allowed to pursue any path they wanted, because, when given complete freedom to become anything they imagined, they consciously chose rebellion against their Creator and suicide
Clown World is a satanic global fail
We are in a transition from a traditional society (let’s call it the patriarchy) to a liberal-minded society (let’s call it a matriarchy). Men suffer quite a lot in this transition, because the laws are essentially all very patriarchal and women still expect things like child-support (something which would normally only exist in a patriarchy)
[…]
Now the patriarchy is actually not a society that favors men over women, and the matriarchy is not a society which favors women over men. Both societies favor men and women equally. I know a lot of MRAs do not believe this and use the draft as evidence that the patriarchy favored women more, but that is not true. The patriarchy is actually a society that favors children, while the matriarchy favors the individual (or self).
The patriarchy is a child-centered society. It is interested in birth and survival rates of children, and that is why males were drafted. Male disposability led to more children. The patriarchy comes from difficult times, it was born in hard times, it is a very social system, an efficient system, and it’s a survival mechanism.
We know it leads to successful societies because many of the major cultures that dominate the world today have a patriarchal history. And we can see this most clearly through the fact that the world’s major religions like Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and Confucianism all come from cultures which support the patriarchy. All of these religions and the cultures that support them speak of female obedience to her husband and male responsibility and dominance over to his family.
[…]
What I do mean to imply is that many parts of the traditional way of structuring society are beneficial to the majority of society, and so I think we should hold on to them. The patriarchy has been successful for many reasons, and we have to be careful not to ignore some of these reasons. Male investment and access to their offspring both in the form of being a role model who would love, guide, and seek the best interests of their children and through their economic contributions benefited society enormously. Allowing women the freedom to focus on producing and caring for children also benefited society.
[…]
Tres Genco was sentenced to six years and eight months in prison followed by five years on post-prison supervision for his 2020 plot to “slaughter” women at an Ohio university[…]
Genco wrote in his manifesto that his goal was, “the death of what I have been deprived of most, but also cherished and fantasize at the opportunity of having but has been neglected of; Women. I will slaughter out of hatred, jealousy, and revenge”[…]
Genco is the first misogynist incel to be charged under federal hate crime statutes[…]
Genco was active on the most popular misogynist incel forum[…]In one post he described how he replicated an assault Rodger described in his manifesto in which he filled a water gun with orange juice and drove around spraying women and couples. Genco wrote that he felt "spiritually connected" to Rodger, who he considered a "saint"[…]
Genco planned and prepared for his attack, which he intended to commit on the anniversary of Rodger’s[…]
Genco also joined the military to gain weapons training[…]Army Basic Training in Georgia in August 2019. He had already started his search for sororities in his area, and in a manifesto entitled "A Hideous Symphany," he explained his hope that his military training would make him a more effective killer. Genco was discharged several months later for “entry-level performance or conduct”[…]
Genco continued to work out logistics for his planned attack[…]He searched "planning a shooting crime" online and researched how to modify and assemble weapons[…]In one note he indicated that he hoped his experience at boot camp would help him kill up to 3,000 people
While Genco was on an ATF watch list, local police thwarted his plot for mass violence in March 2020. Law enforcement responded to a call after Genco barricaded himself in a room with a gun following a fight with his mother
[From “On Sam Vaknin”]
He says that women will dominate the society of the future because male muscle power is obsolete. He also says that the future of the US will be brown in a hundred years because whites are on their way out[…](Following his perverse logic, I guess Negresses will be in charge of the US of the future!)
So this clinical psychologist is as crazy as the malignant narcissists he psychoanalyses: something very common in the so-called mental health professions[…](The racial right has been blind on this issue. What white nationalist knows that psychiatry, psychoanalysis and clinical psychology are pseudo-scientific?)[…]
Since the traitorous Western world empowered the Jews after WW2, the greatest findings in depth psychology were not made by Aryans[…]but by Jews. For example, as far as the abuse of children by their parents is concerned, the greatest breakthrough was to take the side of the child[…]And that step was taken by the Swiss-Jewish Alice Miller[…]
There is nothing wrong with appropriating the findings of Jews as long as we purge them of their subversive messages. However, someone unfamiliar with the JQ will be unable to do so. The work of Kevin MacDonald, for example, is useful for this kind of task. But as long as there is no purely Aryan state, and as Hitler wanted, a Lebensraum where Aryans can flourish unmolested by non-whites, those with the highest IQ, the Jews, will continue to serve as spearheads in various fields where high intellect is required
The mere fact that in recent centuries Jews have overtaken Whites in IQ should provoke hatred of Christianity since Christianity has for two millennia been dysgenic (unlike the eugenics practised by Ashkenazi Jews)[…]Good Aryan sperm ended up in the asses of convent novices, when it should have ended up in Aryan vaginas[…]
Jews would never have won the IQ race against the Greco-Romans in a hypothetical world where Constantine would have been defeated outside Rome
For International Women’s Day, let’s also consider feminism’s impact on women, and recognize that it’s been very bad there too.
Not just radical feminism. Not just the hateful or fringe variety. The whole thing, with its sob stories and sentimental celebrations, its exaggerations and cover-ups, its relentless focus on the demands and alleged needs of one half of humanity at the expense of the other, has been a monumental disaster.
For over 50 years, the movement has been mired in fraudulent claims, myopia, special pleading, double standards, abandonment of principles, manifold hypocrisies, and emotional incontinence.
<...>
Previous generations of women were taught that happiness related directly to virtue, and virtue consisted in living for others, being loyal, being a helpmeet to one’s husband, devoting oneself to one’s children, or in some other manner pursuing a good life—as a nun or a healer, a mystic or a scholar. Feminism deliberately turned such an idea on its head. Ideals of chastity, fidelity, self-sacrifice, self-control and loving kindness were, according to feminism, the imposed ideals by which men prevented women from pursuing their desires. Feminism was about self-fulfillment.
In the years since the 1970s, discussion of female goodness has essentially been ruled out of bounds. While men have always been measured (and measured themselves) against a standard of the good man—one who supports his family, including his wife, defends justice, achieves distinction in the public sphere, protects the weak, and defeats evil—the ideal of the good woman has become a pre-1960s relic. Ask a feminist what a good woman is, and she will either laugh scornfully and refuse to answer, or say that a good woman fights against patriarchy. In other words, she’ll give you an oppositional identity with little or no positive content. The real problem with feminism for women is that it destroyed the positive content of womanhood and replaced it with useless anger.
About two dozen neo-Nazis marched through downtown Nashville, Tennessee, on Saturday in an event the group billed as a celebration to “the great white South,” according to flyers the group’s leader Christopher Alan Pohlhaus posted to the social media app Telegram
Pohlhaus, who uses the moniker “The Hammer” in white power spaces online, heads the neo-Nazi group Blood Tribe and led the group in antisemitic and racist chants as they marched through downtown Nashville[…]
Pohlhaus shared a message from the Blood Tribe Upper Midwest Telegram channel on Jan. 19 that promoted the rally as “Coming soon to Dixie America.” In the Jan. 19 post, the author writes: “We are Nazis. We are white supremacists. We are white ethno nationalists. We despise Jews. We despise [n-word]s and all non-whites. And nobody is having more fun…Get involved”[…]
Pohlhaus founded Blood Tribe in fall 2021 as an organization that favors explicit appeals to white supremacy, Hitler worship and violence. In a Jan. 19 Telegram post, Pohlhaus wrote[…]“When I get to the point where I have a thousand guys marching under the swastika every quarter[…]it will cause brown immigrants to think twice about coming here”[…]
Speaking on a far-right podcast on May 6, 2023, about why Blood Tribe rallied outside two drag shows in Ohio, Pohlhaus said, “We go to the enemy, scream at them, give them PTSD and leave.” In 2023, Pohlhaus posted an audio message to Telegram where he advocated for assaulting and raping women. Pohlhaus said: “It’s still true that people will take war brides in the end of days, and it’s just gonna happen, okay. … Honestly, I don’t find that liberal white women have the right to decide about how their reproductive system is going to be used[…]”
Pohlhaus and the Blood Tribe fantasize about violence online and strategize the best ways to harm perceived enemies. Pohlhaus polled his Telegram followers in a private chat room on July 10, 2023, and asked which of two music festivals “to carpet bomb”
I disagree with Maimonides that [Leviticus] allows battlefield rape (as opposed to forced marriage of captive women, which it clearly allows), but if I were convinced that it did, I would say battlefield rape was good, yes.
I agree with Maimonides that my intuitions may disagree with God's Law, but that puts my intuitions in the wrong, not God's Law.
[From “Was Feminism A Backlash Against Abuse?”]
One claim made by well-meaning rightwingers is that feminism, although a terrible idea that has done significant damage to society, must be understood in the context of backlash against the abuses women suffered by men. This view postulates that feminism is an overreaction against certain ills that women faced and, in order to both understand and properly combat feminism, it must be understood in this situation. While this idea may have (on the surface) some merit, and many early feminists cited abuse as the origin of their work, it as an oversimplification of what actually took place
Before I begin this essay, first let me state that I do not deny that women, at times, faced horrific abuses by men in the pre-feminist world. It was deplorable and there was no excuse for it. But, it is critical to remember that abusive men were, in fact, considered wicked in the West and, more importantly, measures were taken to combat their misbehavior. Yes, it was not a perfect system[…]The major civilization that treated women the best was also the one that birthed feminism[…]
To understand the real origins of feminism we must not look at “the West” for its origins, but a particular area of the West – Yankeedom. A map of the active feminist organizations during the 19th century will show one curious fact – they hit a hard stop at the Mason-Dixon line. Feminism was the interest of Yankee women, not Southern women[…]
I certainly do not deny that women have faced horrific abuses in the past, and while the West was certainly better than the other major civilizations, it was not entirely blameless. However, the rise of modern feminism, and especially its radicalization in the 1960s, cannot be understood as backlash against that abuse[…]Rather, it was (and is) another Yankee attempt to make everyone else like them, the same mentality Southerners have been fighting against for nearly two centuries
Excerpts from a guy explaining why fan fiction turns girls Trans
“And ‘gay ships’ online, gay erotica, can provide a vector for the girl to explore relationships and sexuality with the male objects of her infatuation — without confronting all that resentment, insecurity, hatred and self-doubt that is triggered by female love interest and male-female relationships.
“When it's two men it can be very seductive, because these girls love men, and they don't want to see the women — and it's like this weird, perfect storm for them.”
“The fandom community is going to have that hierarchy — if you are a cis-het white person, you're evil, you're terrible, you're horrible, you're disgusting, you're an oppressor. But if you're trans, if you're gay, if you're not white, then you are amazing. And everybody needs to be super nice to you.
“The LGBT spectrum is really elevated in these fandom communities, partly because of that love of the male-male pairings where these girls are obsessed with the very idea of gay men. They almost think they're being pro-LGBT by sharing gay fan fiction.
“They're developing an aversion to male-female relationships. They can start to over-identify with the ‘gay ships’, in this [online 24/7] environment where there are no checks and balances on the fantasy. It's all these young girls identifying as trans together, ‘shipping the ships’ together. It's so easy to have your identity lines blurred, to start to over-identify with being a gay trans boy. And then gender ideology comes along and says, this is all a sign that deep down, you really want to be a boy.”
For the same reason that the DOJ/FBI/CIA and a lot of other US agencies play act at being aloof from and independent of the US government: they are part of the anti-American Marxocrat Party's so-called "Permanent Government", alternatively known as the Deep State.
<...>
Behind the scenes, they will put the brakes on any President or other official who tries to condemn diversity or fails to be inclusive of either anti-American Marxist "revolutionaries" or anti-American Islamic Jihadists. The Marxocrat Party is, after all, anti-American, pro-Marxist, and pro-Islam. More than that, they are pro-sodomy, pro-abortion, pro-climate change and they stand with every other fraudulent program that is anti-humanity, anti-nationhood, anti-American, anti-family, anti-male, anti-white people, anti-Christian and antisemitic.
<...>
Diversity, inclusion, multi-culturalism, etc., all attack identity.
It began with the blurring of the identity of God; it all ends with the blurring of the identity of human beings and humanity.
Look at diversity's blurring of holiness, and what it means to be holy.
<...>
It was this deceptive and deceitful all-inclusive, diversified identity thinking that brought the condemned heresies of Protestantism into the Catholic liturgy in Pope Paul VI's Novus Ordo mass. And it is this same evil diversification of Catholic identity that today seeks to suppress and eradicate from memory the Latin Mass.
The new mass is inclusive; the old one was exclusive. Can't have that.
Today, the Catholic Pope and his Vatican, the American Presidency and his administration and all professional teachers everywhere, join the globalist efforts of the Davos WEF, COMINTERN, the UN and the EU to bless, approve, protect and advance the causes of not only sodomy and licentiousness, but transsexualism and transgenderism. In open defiance of biology and human physiology they hopelessly and permanently blur the identities of male and female.
What does it even mean to be human any more?
Evil uses women to destroy men. Evil comes through the woman — she is the gates of Hell.
But men and women can overcome through forgiveness — starting with mothers.
3:07 AM · Feb 27, 2024 · 7,140 Views
26 Reposts 3 Quotes 140 Likes 8 Bookmarks
It’s getting harder and harder to find a high quality woman in America. I’m leaving…
It seems their expectations and standards have only risen in the past few years. The 6/10 women (6s, 7s, 8s) who ALSO have a decent personality accumulate for less than 5% of the overall American female population. That’s millions of men competing for the top 5% of women. America lacks quality control and I’m not sure if things will ever change. Time to leave ✈️
You’ll wind more women go in those places with shorts than you will women with dresses and pants put together. . . if you dress like that and you get raped and I'm on the jury, he's going to go free...a man's a man.
