Point Refuted A Thousand Times
A fundamental flaw of woke is "right makes might".
It's an attitude of "i an doing the right thing, therefore i will succeed, therefore anyone who doesn't believe me must be wrong and must be actively a threat"
This belief of the right to succeed supercedes hard work and attention to detail ... which leads to failure.
Hence: go woke go broke
J*******: The biggest concern with black America to me as a black American, is Unity. If we can do commerce with one another at many levels whether its a connivence store, beauty supply business, or any other type we would be fine. Unity and mutual respect will defeat what ever the racism effect does in 2024. This is harsh but true we are brainwashed to not trust each other. The church plays a big role in that. Along with the Democratic party.
David Garret: For starters, white males are 4th on the economic list behind Asian men, Indian men and Asian females. Are white people being subjected to systemic racism? How does the systemic racism know to skip black families that have two parents in the household? That demographic is on par with the rest of America. Perhaps we should focus on inner city culture. They celebrate criminality, the frown upon academic excellence, there is little presence by the fathers and crime is going so unchecked, we are loosing major cities. Stop externalizing the problem
Denise Gaarder: my co-worker and I earn exactly the same amount. Her sone got free tuition for college because he is black but I am paying parent plus loans for what was not covered by scholarships for my daughters education. So who is benefiting? it has been over 150 years since slavery ended. When are people going to have to be responsible for their own success or lack of it?
j sam: Its funny how half of the country believes that only minority populations deal with racial discrimination. In fact its become ok for minorities to spew hateful racist garbage to the world because its about white people. If we stop looking for racism it becomes a lot harder to find. By labeling everything as racist, not only are we cheapening the effect of true racism but we also are breeding what was once referred to as reverse racism. Teaching children that everything is racist will only continue the hate.
You seem to have stumbled into this sub and mistaken it for one of those cucked "rational centrist" hives where they preen and fawn all over themselves for their willingness to lose honorably and allow the enemy to win so long as it's done above board.
You can cram that shit up your gaped asshole. We're in this to win. You're damn straight I want my values and my views and my side to win and dominate, and the enemy's values and views to be eradicated forever. I don't care who thinks that makes me a "hypocrite". It's not hypocritical to be in your trench firing your rifle at the enemy hoping your rounds will hit, while he's in his trench firing at his rifle at you and you're hoping his rounds will miss.
If something strengthens my side and harms the enemy, it is good. If something harms my side and strengthens the enemy, it is bad. I don't care if it's the same thing used in different way. The thing that matters is the result. Victory for us and our beliefs, the grave for them and theirs.
Failure to support representation of your values in media results in the disappearance of your values from media. Since it’s impossible to create a story beyond Dick and Jane reader primer level with no values, the disappearance of your values from media inherently means their substitution with someone else’s. To smugly argue against defending the existence of one’s values in media is dumb. To smugly argue that one should fight against their own values in media is worse than dumb—it is a reprehensible sort of cultural suicide.
That said, I do not extend you the courtesy of believing that you are merely a smug, dumb, culturally-suicidal fool. I strongly suspect there are values you’d be perfectly comfortable seeing defended and promoted in media, and that they are likely quite close to the evil being mocked here.
The host —[…]Sam Tripoli — brought up a roast of[…]Tom Brady. Tripoli said he “couldn’t be happier” for the people who participated but criticized the lack of what he called “dangerous” material
“What it felt to me was that they were trying to tell me ‘Hey man, come back. Come back to our platforms. We’re doing the dangerous-dangerous again.’ Or what I call safe-dangerous,” he said. Tripoli remarked that, to him, even calling Tom Brady homophobic slurs “isn’t that dangerous”
“Yeah, or telling a nigger joke or something,” Peters interrupted
The discussion quickly turned antisemitic with Peters asking Tripoli whether or not he believed “9/11 was Israel.” Tripoli answered in the affirmative[…]he didn’t believe “sand people flew planes”[…]
“I recommend everybody reads that [Final Judgment] as well as Mein Kampf,” he said“[…]Make sure that you don’t read the one that was translated by a person who claims to be a Jew”
Peters also disputed that he ever denied the Holocaust. Peters claimed that “the only thing that they can ever get me on on this” was the time he used a plaque at Auschwitz which bore the incorrect number of victims to falsely suggest that fewer than 6 million Jews died
During the episode of The Stew Peters Show in which he made those remarks, Peters also questioned whether the gas chambers or crematoria ever existed at Auschwitz
Peters also promoted his upcoming antisemitic propaganda film Occupied, while simultaneously insisting that he doesn’t hate Jews[…]
This attempt at feigning religious tolerance didn’t last long, however, as Peters insisted that there is a Jewish “occupation” of American institutions. And when asked by Tin Foil Hat co-host Johnny Woodard if he would vote for a Jewish person, Peters balked
“No, I would not vote for a Jew,” he said. “I believe that these are a depraved people”
“All of them?” Tripoli asked
“Well, the ones that are not depraved are misled by degenerates who are promoting agendas of depravity”
I'll come clean. I can't be objective about this because I've been beaten and abused for my skin color, my religion, my nationality most of my life. I've been denied jobs, I've been denied college applications, I've been lambasted and spit on for being 'the villain' in every way that mattered to a world brought up to despise me and my family.
My father was called 'baby killer' for voting for Bush. My mom was disowned by my brother as a 'trophy wife' because she chose to raise children instead of pursue her medical career. I've had my church vandalized several times and defecated on. I've had my email and my account on this very channel hacked for my views.
I used to have a different DA account but someone put me on a 'hate list' and used my credit card to send my insulting things through the mail so I needed to reboot my entire identity. I've had friends leave me and hurt themselves because of gender confusion and the nihilism caused by terror of climate change and Trump blamed over every media outlet. Basically my life was destroyed because of the jolly politics you purport to worship, and not once have I seen ANY benefit from those grand progressive plans.
I've witnessed every franchise I love die and be worn as a skin suit for the same simpleminded agendas so even my imagination is under siege. No dreams for you, colonizer.
Right now I live with my ailing parents who can't get work because of endless lockdowns and regulations and I suffer from physical ailments due to constant stress from being singled out daily and living in fear I'll be doxed or removed again for saying the wrong things. But I've ceased to care. I don't care anymore becasue I don't have any hope.
But yes, I'm not a victim because my great great great ancestors owned slaves (even though I'm actually probably descended from slaves myself) thanks to the color of my skin.
In no particular order, when the Harris Honeymoon comes to a close, here are the 10 questions we dare the media to ask the Vice President:
“Nearly 92% of your White House staff has either quit in anger, resigned on their own, or been fired during your first three years as vice president – which seems like an unusually high number. Was the problem racism, Donald Trump, or that gosh-darn Russian misinformation?”
“Your first responsibility as vice president was solving the problem on the border. Bravo on a job well done! Which one of your clever strategies that fixed the border will you redeploy to tackle, say, high inflation?”
“Have you noticed that Hunter Biden seems all jittery and scatterbrained whenever he returns from the bathroom? Weird, huh?”
“In 2019, you claimed that ‘voter suppression’ was why Democrats Stacey Adams (Georgia) and Andrew Gillum (Florida) lost their elections. Have you ever apologized for being an election denier? I mean… don’t you realize that democracy dies in darkness?!”
Being forced to take the trash out or being forced to do your homework are a little different to being forced to marry (potentially for life) a man you do not wish to marry, to have sex with him as and when he desires (as is the case in their culture), bear his children without a say in the matter, and risk your life in doing so.
I was forced to go to the military (like every man in my country), I was forced to serve my country with my life (literally).
I don't think those are small things. I would do them without being forced, too. But that doesn't change they are being forced upon me.
I really have hard time understanding the demonizing of sex. Everyone WANTS to have sex in their life, it's the best thing in the world.
Now when sex is forced it becomes the WORST AND MOST ATROCIOUS THING IN THE WORLD.
How the fuck does that kind of switch happen.
Of course I think rape is bad. But I don't understand the polarization. I think there is a lot of hypocrisy, exaggeration and victimization involved.
Not all sexual experiences for all involved parties are pleasurable.
Would you look forward to sex if you were unlikely to orgasm because your partner wasn't interested in your pleasure, or even your comfort? If it was a painful experience for you because you aren't aroused by your partner, would you look forward to doing that again?
Obviously I would not enjoy it and wouldn't look forward to doing that again. But people do other discomforting things, too, because it's part of life and needs to be done. Like work.
I'm not sorry that I had to go through conscription. I, and other men, owe that to our grandfathers. Yeah it's against free will, but as I've said previously, some things in life aren't that pleasurable yet they still have to be done. The result justifies the means.
Well people who don't want to have sex are a very small minority. Asexuality is 1% or less of the population.
Nope. Real-life people recognize it as a marketing trend, same as any other. It's an unfortunate side-effect of the fact that nowadays you get tons more word-of-mouth from a Tweet than you would with a commercial. As such, companies think that it's "good business" to pander to the interests of people who spend all their time online... Which, as it turns out, are predominantly overweight, rainbow-haired, perpetually-offended, sexually-confused, easily-triggered, Gender Studies Majors and other (barely) high-functioning social misfits.
That's who's online all the time, sharing Tweets and memes and "making themselves heard", and so in turn, companies feel forced to pander to them. Because it SEEMS like there's a lot of them, but the thing is, they're just incredibly loud. As we see in Real Life by how most "woke"-infested movies fail hard, the growing number of lawsuits nationwide to stop letting schools indoctrinate impressionable kids with their nonsense, and the fact that people really, REALLY love Chick-Fil-A, MOST people are definitely NOT on the bandwagon.
Companies are slowly coming around to this. By now they've figured out that most of these people don't have real jobs and are barely scraping by under the crushing debt of their Liberal Arts degrees, and so in turn it makes no sense to bend over for them.
For starters, the suggestions in Project 2025 are not nearly as dangerous as BLM's intent to defund the police, which has happened with deadly effect nationwide, leading to an explosion in crime that has mostly affected black communities. Despite the carnage, BLM still calls for defunding the police, because that is what Marxists do.
And honestly, I can't assure you Project 2025 wasn't written in part by never-Trumpers looking to make trouble before November.
As expected, Democrat fear-peddlers are treating Project 2025 like it's the Republicans' "Mein Kampf."
Social media is bursting with memes spewing fake details from Project 2025 and the left is screeching in their Crocs.
Here's the fun part: Trump has already denounced it, but that doesn't stop the namby-pamby Chicken-Little types from trying to terrify low-info barely-thinkers into panic mode.
Whereas I do not agree with everything posted, most of it is spot on.
The document largely calls for Trump to—if he wins—"de-woke" our government. It's pro-family and pro-life. It states that the "next HHS secretary should immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism" (page 284).
I'm cool with that.
It does not suggest:
Making birth control illegal
Putting illegal immigrants in "concentration camps"
Ending overtime pay
Ending school lunch programs
Cutting veterans' benefits
Project 2025 is nothing more than 922 pages of opinions and recommendations, many of which make sense.
If you want to do battle with factless chuckleheads on Facebook—which is pointless, they never learn—you can read Project 2025 below.
One, said kids do it because it’s trendy. All their friends are doing it. The mainstream media presents it as fashionable or glamorous to fuck those of the same sex, or to be willfully confused about what’s between your legs and hard-coded into your DNA. To sexually identify as an alien hermaphrodite with a barbie doll crotch. We do think of kids as being rebellious and so quick and eager to stick it to the man, or those in authority.
The only problem is, kids tend to only direct that rebelliousness towards their parents. Not towards the man, nor the establishment, nor towards crony capitalism, except maybe in word.
As much as we like to make fun of the regressive left for pretending to be edgy and rebellious despite having BEEN the establishment for a decade or longer, it’s easy for children to forget that. Many of them lack the maturity or the experience to understand that they are not being “liberated” or “freed” or being “authentic” or “true to themselves.”
I digress, but the point is, if the culture tells children that it’s cool to be a sodomite, they will take it to heart. They seldom have the cognitive ability to withstand that propaganda on their own. If sexual orientation were truly inborn or innate, this would be extremely harmful, probably even more so than forcing heterosexuality on adolescents who are clearly gay. They’re essentially persecuting those who carry society, carry the human population. Just because they’re jealous and angry at them.
But if homosexuality were made, not born, that provides an even stronger incentive to not normalize homosexuality. Like I said earlier, for even a large minority of the population to be LGBTQ is a disaster for any future population growth, or the well-being of future generations, as few in number as they may be. If homosexuality were made, not born, the last thing that you want would be an environment that actively fosters homosexual orientation in children. It doesn’t fucking matter how much society kisses the LGBTQ community on the ass. Being gay, or especially trans, significantly reduces your quality of life.
And the fewer people who are willing or able to bear children the natural way, or at least provide existing children with a stable home environment with parental role models of both sexes, the more likely society will collapse.
Despite there indeed being several sources for faggotry, they nevertheless always come down to choice. Regardless of the origins of faggotry, it is in the end unified by its nature as degenerate behavior. You can thus equate it to a vice. Faggotry must be treated as a vice and not as a social group. Vices have to be overcome, or else you’re just a degenerate. That’s why by and large, regardless of the roots of faggotry, it becomes a choice of either indulging in it or denying it – so it is always a choice. Just like how one has a choice not to eat themselves into a hamplanet, but if they do so it betrays a weakness of character, weakness of will, lack of integrity and ultimately selfish and narcissistic behavior.
So what if you are “born that way“? Either get treatment or simply overcome it by sheer will-power. Psychological disorder? Same thing. Perversion? Fucking stop it. This ultimately comes down to the subject of one’s inherent inferiority and the test of Free Will.
If the choice was out of their hands (forced labor, slavery, forced exercising) the material change would follow, because all of that is merely material and subject to changeability. But as soon as you let them off that leash their weak spirit will surrender to material desires. What makes them inferior is their inherent nature, their weak spirit. That is what you are born with, everything else simply follows from there. There are those of strong will who succumb to degeneracy all the same, as it is hard to escape the decay of the world around us, but it is possible. It is easy to fall from grace and it is hard to climb back up, but for the inferior there are no options.
That is the Test of Free Will, which exists only for those who have strong spirit and strong will, they are given a choice: succumb or overcome.
Modern Who is quickly destroying itself. Between the previous two "doctors" being unwanted and the most disliked, and now Tennent, arguably the most popular doctor of the modern generation, destroying himself, the IP is joining Star Wars and Disney, holding on by a thread.
The only problem is Dr. Who has some padding and protection against Get Woke, Go Broke as the BBC survives off of the TV Licenses that UK citizens have to pay for to watch TV (There's a lot more to it than that but in a nutshell it's essentially state funded. A British person can explain it better than I can). It has protections but is not at all immune from Get Woke, Go Broke. Toy and merch sales are plummeting and I've spoken to a few guys, one of whom is an avid Dalek cosplayer who has said he's not going out to any more Who conventions after what's become of the IP in the last decade.
If Kanye West couldn't get blacks on mass to vote for Trump, he should stop wasting his time pandering to them. Blacks might be intellectually inferior but at least they have the common sense and streetsmarts to understand that the GOP is majority white party. They don't care about values such as individualism, free market capitalism, and meritocracy because those ideals don't resonate with their psyche and culture which glorifies savagery, degeneracy, and low IQ behavior. Blacks know they can't win in a fair and honest competition with other races which explains why the Democrats know how to appeal to their pathological behavior. It is so sad that Trump and the GOP is so out of touch with their core audience.
Carl Sagan was also an avid marijuana smoker who claimed marijuana gave him scientific insights.[2] Sagan's avid pot smoking and agnosticism no doubt inspired Sagan's pseudoscientific fantasies that he foisted on his gullible fans. For example, Sagan alleged that evolution was a "fact".[3] Thomas Henry Huxley, the English biologist, known as "Darwin's Bulldog" for his vehement advocacy of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, was an agnostic. The Barna Group found that those who hold to the worldviews of agnosticism and in atheism were more likely, than theists in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable: illegal drug use; excessive drinking; sexual relationships outside of marriage; abortion; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; obscene language; gambling; pornography and obscene sexual behavior; and engaging in homosexuality/bisexuality.[4]
The insanity we call "Woke" is, in part, the belief that a white person can't criticize a non-white person, even if that person is a criminal, as doing so is proof of seething "racism."
I recently reviewed the new film "God and Country." Briefly, my first takeaway from the film was that the threat of Christian nationalism was being intentionally overhyped in order to frighten the viewer. The idea is presented that there is a vast, well-funded, and powerful network of people who will seize the day after the election to create an America that is forever stuck in the racist, sexist, dystopian 1950s. My other takeaway? Watching the various vignettes and examples of what the filmmakers call Christian nationalism, interspersed with the commentary, one is left with the impression that anyone who is not a progressive is a suspect. I felt like I was being presented with two choices: Us or Them. There is no middle.
Christian nationalism has always been a part of the Left's talking points, and thus far, it has taken a back seat to MAGA Republicans and white supremacy. But it is about to be fused with them to become the third part of a triumvirate designed to further isolate those who do not see eye-to-eye with Left.
[ In response to a post called “ "leaving a pedo around small children is a-okay" “]
I mean, yeah, nice reductive argument you got there. Do you really think that someone attracted to kids has absolutely no control over themselves? Are you that brain dead? What if that person was born into the same society as you and had the same super "anti-pedo" mindset instilled into them? Clearly they'd see their attraction as gross, and thus never act on it, yet you're such a dumb fuck of a human being as to believe they still would? Are you even real? Like have you ever interacted with a human before? Have you only been constantly raped all your life and that's why you don't think anyone can control themselves? Fucking moron
It became more common for minors to troon out in the latter half of the 2010s, as gross perverts online became more emboldened in grooming children to be confused about their sexuality or “gender identity.” Identifying as queer or trans became a fashion statement for many zoomers, similar to punk or goth, but with far more self-mutilation and chemical castration. It’s gotten to the point where it’s estimated that as much as 40% of zoomers identify as being LGBTQ. An obvious disaster for any future population growth, a sure sign of future societal collapse. And also a major self-own, as it casts reasonable doubt on the “born that way” meme.
Occidental Dissent is listed as a “hate site.”
Can you think of a death or a murder though with a more hateful perp than this one?
Derek Chauvin had his knee on the neck of George Floyd because he was high on drugs and resisting arrest. Bionca Ellis stabbed a three-year-old White toddler to death and the media is silent about it. The coverage of George Floyd provoked months of violent riots during the 2020 election.
Like many others he doesn't realise that, the real combat is the globalists against the patriot.
The world of the merchant, the money, the seduction by a totaly free and unregulated capitalism, who just want destroy everything who could limit his power, and his domination, and those limits, those last barriers are
- The love of peoples for their countries, their land, their culture.
- Everything who is about religion, spirituality.
-The familly, the education and everything who imply morals values.
- But also the freedom of mind, of thinking.
And things like that NPC don't realise or don't understand it.
The notion that tariffs are a tax on US consumers is a lie pushed by outsourcers and the Chinese Communist Party.
my mother was 13 when she gave birth to me and my dad was in his mid to late 20's i CHALLENGE AND DARE YOU to explain why she and her mother and her mother and her mother were all capable of having a succussful relationship with these "Hunters" and now live pretty fufilling lives without any real complaints about there childhood and why this girl can't.
My mother was brought up in a very American culture and had a child with a very American man. He may or may not have just been interested in getting some fresh good kitty! or he may have legitimately loved and cared for my mom none the less he eventually left her and she was forced to care for yours truly all by herself she was left a single mom to a "Pedophile" but within a couple years she got over it moved to the states got a university degree and is now living happily and even ocassionally meets with that pedophilic monster to have a cup of coffee with him when she visits Los Angeles.
Why are these 2 so different? infact the Man in this article is a bit younger then my dad is and is certainly much less mentally developed and my mom was no further ahead developmentally then any other girl her age. Yes 8 times out of 10 things go bad but that means 2 times out of 10 they go right it's a gamble and so long as they know the odds and have some guidance i feel a girl of 12 years of age has the right to decide whether she wants to have a sexual relationship with this man.
[Article Title: "Marjorie Taylor Greene compares Trump to Jesus at Las Vegas rally"]
[...]
“The Democrats and the fake news media want to constantly talk about ‘President Trump is a convicted felon’,” she told a crowd that waited in soaring early-summer temperatures. “Well, you want to know something? The man that I worship is also a convicted felon. And he was murdered on a Roman cross.”
[...]
It is not the first time Greene has drawn parallels between Trump and Christ – whom Christians consider to be the messiah and son of God – as well as other historical martyr figures.
[...]
“Trump is joining some of the most incredible people in history being arrested today. Nelson Mandela was arrested, served time in prison. Jesus was arrested and murdered by the Roman government,” she told the Right Side Broadcast Network.
“There have been many people throughout history that have been arrested and persecuted by radical, corrupt governments … I just can’t believe it’s happening, but I’ll always support him. He’s done nothing wrong.”
[...]
[From “The Lethality of Low-IQ Demographics”]
Karl Denninger is not at all sanguine about the future of a United States that has lost an average 10 IQ points or more since 1965:
You need about a 115 IQ to build and maintain modern civilization
Examples? Too many to count. How about Flint’s water system?[…]
Why didn’t it poison kids for the previous 80 years?[…]
Is lead a great material for water feed pipes? Depends on when. Today, no. HDPE is better in all respects[…]
But 80 years ago it didn’t existLead did. And it too can tolerate a modest amount of movement[…]It self-protects almost-immediately[…]
Now put an acidic water supply down it and that layer is destroyed with the lead leaching into the waterThe 115+ IQ people who built and ran the water plant at Flint all those years knew this, and knew how to keep it safe[…]
Then Shaqueena, or her analog with a <115 IQ took over. And changed the water source. And, at the same time, didn’t check and make sure the chemical and pH balance remained correct because the intellectual firepower to do so was simply no longer there[…]
Would you use a lead service line today[…]? Of course not. But is it unsafe? Not as long as the people running the plant are of sufficient intelligence[…]
The same problem that is presently afflicting the USA is about to hit the UK and Europe as well. It’s not noticeable at first, because it doesn’t matter if your kebab sellers, taxi drivers, and other common immigrant occupations are filled by newcomers with lower IQs than the natives
But once the second and third generations start competing with the natives, and outcompeting them thanks to DEI initiatives and shameless ethnic nepotism, the lower-IQ effect hits with a vengeance[…]
Translation: US infrastructure is going to rapidly decline to the Mexican level. Northern European infrastructure is going to rapidly decline to the US level
[From ““Gay” Chorus Mocked Victims of Homosexual Predation”]
A LITTLE recent history for “Pride Month:”
In 2021, the San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus made fun of the millions of victims of homosexual predation in their musical video featuring the song, “We’ll Convert Your Children”
The connection between homosexuality and pedophilia has been known for thousands of years and has been abundantly confirmed by recent studies:
Of 86 – 88 million heterosexual men, 9 percent of them victimized 8 million girls under age 18, which constitutes 25 percent of all girls. An uncertain percentage of the estimated 2 million homosexual men victimized 6-8 million boys, under age 18, amounting to 17 – 24 percent of all boys. Therefore, considered in the aggregate, 3 to 4 boys are sexually molested per homosexual adult male. Only .09 girls are sexually molested per heterosexual adult male, which is to say that, on average, 1 in 11 heterosexual males victimizes a girl under 18
Further corroborating these findings, the Journal of the American Medical Association published the following facts: 50 percent of male AIDS victims reported having sex with an adult male by the age of 16. 20 percent of male AIDS victims had sex with an adult male by age 10. (Source)
Nevertheless, the chorus made fun of the idea that homosexuals create homosexuals through child abuse
The many young people whose lives have been decimated, who have turned to suicide or drugs, who have never had children of their own, all because of homosexual predation, which used to be private but now comes from schools, the government and popular culture, are of no concern to the selfish and the self-absorbed
I still think the whole "Queers for pallystein" bunch are peak masochism. I mean they're advocating for a group that would slaughter the lot of them without a second thought or a hint of remorse. That's not even D-u-m dumb or s-t-o-o-p-i-d stupid. That's just plain suicidal! Is their logic that "if we advocate for pallystein they'll be more progressive towards us?" because that'll never happen! EVERY muslim majority nation outlaws rainbow lifestyles, some of them on penalty of death.
I really hope some of this bunch are stupid enough to actually take our advice and travel to a muslim majority country to try and advocate for their lifestyle and then watch their shocked pikachu faces as they get hurled off of a rooftop to the cheering crowds of bag heads below.
Gunter [sic] Bechly Explains What The Fossil Evidence Really Says
In this bonus interview released as part of the Science Uprising series, paleontologist Gunter [sic] Bechly unveils the truth behind the fossil record. There are multiple trade secrets among paleontologists. Chief among them is that Darwin's insistence on gradualism was motivated by his understanding that the dramatic jumps found in the fossil record imply intervention. Darwin hoped that time would reveal his desperately needed transitional fossils. It has not, and what science has learned since Darwin's day would've shattered his hopes as Bechly explains.
(submitter’s note: in response to a post saying that it’s valid to be openly queer and it’s valid to be in the closet or still figuring things out.)
So this is Pride, are you proud of this? Absolutely VILE reprobates. Do what you want in private - STOP BEING P3RVERTS NAKED IN FRONT OF CHILDREN AND TRYING TO MAKE CHILDREN TAKE UNNEEDED MEDICATION!
When we examine the natural world, we are struck by the order, harmony, and purpose embedded within it. The fine-tuning of the universe—the precise values of physical constants that allow for the existence of stars, planets, and ultimately life—suggests a level of calibration that defies random chance. The anthropic principle, which observes that the universe appears to be finely tuned for the emergence of life, further bolsters the argument for design. The conditions necessary for life are so specific and interdependent that they point to the intentionality of a Designer.
<...>
The notion that something can arise from nothing is not only counterintuitive but philosophically untenable. The principle of causality, which undergirds scientific inquiry, demands an adequate cause for every effect. The existence of the universe, with its finely tuned laws and constants, necessitates an explanation beyond the material realm. The cosmological argument posits that the universe had a beginning—a singularity from which space, time, and matter emerged. This beginning points to a transcendent cause, an uncaused First Cause, which we understand to be God.
Intelligent Design does not merely fill the gaps left by scientific inquiry; it provides a coherent framework that unifies our understanding of the cosmos, life, and human existence. It aligns with our intuitive sense of purpose and meaning, offering a narrative that life is not an accidental byproduct of impersonal forces but the intentional creation of a loving and purposeful Designer.
In embracing Intelligent Design, we acknowledge the limitations of a purely naturalistic worldview and open ourselves to the profound implications of a created universe. We are not cosmic orphans adrift in a sea of chance but bearers of the imago Dei, the image of God, endowed with purpose and dignity.
I love the evolutionist stories lol, they're so funny because they're so dumb.
The shrinking pond theory, the hooved dog crocodile turning into a whale because it wanted to swim lol, the apes coming down from the trees because they wanted to walk upright, and the flightless birds that grew wings over millions of years rofl.
Great comedy.
Math is the language of God and doesn't prove evolution at all.
Math says if evolution is true the whole earth would've been overrun with humans long ago.
Math says that the population we have now, 8 billion, can be rewound to come to 8 people who got off a boat.
Math also says there was a y chromosome bottleneck a few thousand yrs ago or so and that we are all from three individuals, namely the sons of Noah.
Math says our sun is special and very rare, just as our moon and planet are equally rare and unique.
Math says way too much as evidence of a Creator Designer.
the narrative they are regurgitating is ridiculously false. There is no genocide. Their cause-celeb, Hamas, fights, hides, and stores their weaponry amongst civilians, and even dress in civilian clothes - all of which are against international laws of warfare! Civilian lives lost are tragic but are also the direct result of these tactics, which is EXACTLY what Hamas wants because it creates the propaganda these students fall for. The media is no different, parroting these talking points and taking, at face value, the claims of Palestinian health organizations (which are only Hamas in sheep's clothing). Oh, and lest we forget, Hamas broke a cease-fire on October 7th by invading Israel and killing, assaulting, and kidnapping innocent civilians. And by all accounts, the majority of Palestinian civilians approved.
children are off limits for fucking
There is no rational age to end childhood. 11 years old (when it was consumated) may have been a perfectly reasonable age biologically. You cannot say to me that 16 is more rational, it just isn't. You have to draw the line somewhere irrational. Modern society has chosen 16-18 because we have elongated adolescence. That it varies from country to country shows you that it is irrational. It's 14 in Spain, would you say fucking a 14 year old spaniard was ok but fucking a 15 year old American is wrong? Children grew up quicker back then when there was not systematic education. What's the difference in having an 11 year old working for a living and being married?
Muhammad had a dozen other wives, none of whom were underage, so he was not exclusively a paedophile. This argument really annoys me because there is no doubt he did not abuse Aisha, he was a great husband and she loved him dearly. Hate muhammad for being a war mongering psychopath who delighted about the thought of the vast majority of people suffering in hell-fire for eternity. Don't hate him for the age of his youngest wife. It's a lame emotional argument because of the stigma of sexuality, and the acceptability of violence. If I was Aisha and I believed Muhammad was a prophet of God then damn right I would marry the shit out of him, and anyone would be lucky to be in that position.
The whole issue of consent is bullshit. Why is sex so special? Other than because a religion tells you it is. Look at how muslim countries approach it, it's illegal to even hold hands. Should holding hands be illegal before the age of consent here? It's just as logical. But I don't think the big religions are in support of a 17 years old age of consent when Mary was only 13 and Mohammad married a 7 year old. If you believe in God, why would he make us biologically sexually active at around 12, if it was wrong to have sex until 17?
The age of consent was upped to 16 to stop the common act of forced child prostitution which was a just law, but it shouldn't apply anymore. My state has a year extra from the others because of crazy puritans. The fact that secular liberal countries have different ages shows how arbitrary and unfair they are.
Do we need to use age in the law? What about driving for another example. If the best 12 year old in the country can pass their driving test and has provably higher ability than any adult, should they not be allowed to drive? There are plenty of 18 year olds psychologically unfit to be driving but they're allowed to because the law is based on age only, and then they go and get other people killed because of it. It doesn't make sense to draw the line based on the position of the Earth around the sun. What would happen if like in many sci-fi stories, adult humans could be farmed much quicker. Would a 6 month old that had the body of a 20 year old have to wait until 37 to have sex? I don't like having laws without clearly defined loopholes that allow the innocent people their basic rights in life, and the most basic is that you own your own body. To me defining a law by age is no more logical than defining it by sex or race. It's accepted females mature quicker than males, if it was really about the psychological maturity necessary for informed consent why aren't there different ages for males and females?
First of all, the Liberals are the dominant group politically in the US and other Western nations. Therefore what Liberals want they usually get; no surprise to anyone with a knowledge of human events.
Second, the opposition to Liberals, classified as conservative by Prothero, is made of of disparate and often opposing groups, many favor/don't oppose the great Liberal victories of which Prothero boosts: legal pot and legal sodomy. Destroying freedom to own guns, an issue that all non-Liberals oppose, has not gone gone too well for the Liberals, as even the professor concedes. Internet freedom is still with us, in spite of massive Liberal opposition.
Also, while JFK might be classified as Liberal, in no way could Thomas Jefferson be considered Liberal. Jefferson flourished in the 18th century, today's political categories are not relevant.
I’m Unvaccinated and That’s OK!
MOM'S CHOICE AWARD WINNER!
I'm Unvaccinated and That's OK! is the story of an unvaccinated child named Nicholas Novaks, who shares the many reasons why his parents have chosen not to vaccinate him. Nicholas explains his parents’ personal concerns about vaccine injury, the importance of finding a doctor they can trust and openly speak with, the research they did before making this decision, and what life is like for an unvaccinated child who has an older, vaccine-injured sibling.
Inspired by the personal stories of vaccine-injured children, which have been shared with Dr. Shannon Kroner over many years of working with special needs families, Dr. Kroner aims to raise awareness of the importance of vaccine choice and the necessity of doing the research before making an important decision such as vaccination.
Join Nicholas as he shares what it means to be an unvaccinated child in today’s world and why one's personal choice regarding vaccination must always be respected.
preview pages
If you get right down to it, The Texas Revolution does provide a lesson—in reverse—for today. Anglo-American settlers first entered Texas under the terms of an agreement with the King of Spain and later the government of Mexico. They didn't assimilate, became a majority and eventually seceded.
The root problem here is not the Alamo or anything that happened there. The root problem is that a growing segment of our citizenry, including many born in the U.S., choose not to identify with our country.
And that, my friends, is a very real problem indeed.
On the Apr. 17, 2024 episode of The Matt Walsh Show,[…]Matt Walsh claimed that Aboriginal Australians “happen to have, on average, the second lowest IQ of any demographic group on the planet”[…]Walsh cited an anonymous X account[…]
What do these activists mean when they say they wanna decolonize math, given that the entire idea of decolonizing math is completely incoherent? The Arabs were colonizers too. And why are Australians of all people so interested in promoting this idea? Well one possibility is that, by some estimates as the Twitter account i/o points out, Aboriginal Australians happen to have, on average, the second lowest IQ out of any demographic group on the planet
Now that’s the sort of thing that’s supposed to be unciteable, but it’s impossible to talk about certain groups struggling academically without bringing up the intellectual elephant in the room. I mean there might be a reason why there aren’t many Aboriginals working at NASA[…]It’s an important point because it means that decolonization, practically speaking, entails dumbing down these subjects or destroying them altogether
And mainly we see, with this decolonization agenda, the embarrassment that liberal Westerners feel about the fact that their ancestors were far more advanced[…]The liberal Westerner’s constantly looking for ways to even out the score. And we’re seeing that more and more in this country as well[…]
But as we just established, some cultures and civilizations did indeed advance science and mathematics more than others. I mean there were some cultures and civilizations that didn’t advance it at all because they didn’t even have the concepts. And there were others that did quite a bit to advance it. And some of those were colonizers[…]
I mean maybe you could argue that this belongs in some elective history course somewhere, but it has no place affecting courses on the fundamentals of mathematics, which is exactly what’s happening in this country
Now if you are a government employee and you are a straight, white, Christan, conservative male, you are definitely discriminated against in the name of diversity and inclusion! I know firsthand because I am one of them!
>White people can't claim racism when something doesn't go their way.
>Police don't need to go through special training to deal with white people due to sensitivities in their community.
>White people can't get a job or scholarship based on their skin color or ethnic background.
>White people aren't allowed to say terms like "black privilege" or "black pandering"; yet terms such as "white privilege" or "white mediocrity" are acceptable.
>White people aren't allowed to say anything negative about someone that's not white because then that person is a "bigoted racist" but other races can crap on white people, and nothing is said to them.
So who are the privileged ones?
Trans women are not women. Trans men are not men. They never will be the opposite sex no matter how much they mutilate themselves or how many hormones they take. The fact that you come to this site parroting the same leftist bullshit makes my fucking head spin. Go back to your fuckin hugbox you, sniveling, mouth-breathing, retard.
Somewhere deep inside of ourselves we all know we’re not on a spinning rock. We know Australia isn’t Down Unda. We know our aussie mates aren’t walking around upside-down and rotating at the same time. We know gravity doesn’t make any sense when applied to vast oceans tipped over and under and swirling. We know how water works. It always finds its level within a container. Sea level is there for all to see. There is no curvature of the earth. We’re stationary. The sun, moon and the stars move around us. It’s not rocket science. Although it kind of is if you study the way a rocket curves and lands.
Thing is, we’ve been trained not to trust our God-given intelligence. Leave it to the experts. To Hollywood. To NASA. Our tiny little brains couldn’t possibly understand. It doesn’t matter that it makes no sense. It’s science! Where have we heard that before? Trust the science.
Well no. I don’t trust the science one little bit. Especially Jesuit science. The heliocentric model is a fraud in my book. Let’s throw in evolution, dinosaurs and Einstein’s theory of relativity while we’re at it. Nope. Not buying them. Call me a heretic all you like. Sane people have been thrown into lunatic asylums for less. I’ll do my own research and draw my own conclusions. Laugh. Mock. Snarl. Threaten. I don’t care. I will honour my innate intelligence. I refuse to believe absurdities.
People say, ‘Who cares?’ What does it matter? We have more important things to discuss right now’. I care. It matters. It exposes the foundational lie that all the other scientism lies were built upon. The Galileo inquisition from 1616 was a show trial. Shady members of the Vatican were in on it, playing devil’s advocate in order to promote the false perception of reality and rewrite astrological history. The aim: To discredit the Bible which places a stationary earth under a ‘firmament’. Snort all you like. This spiritual battle isn’t for softies. Discernment required.
The question was never that good content isn't out there to be enjoyed - we all know that. The issue is that, for the past decade and change, there has been an active and insidious attempt to attack and besmirch major cultural touchstones (yes, like Star Wars) by either turning them into mouthpieces of THE MESSAGE or else destroy them completely. What we're seeing happen at Disney/Lucasfilm/Marvel is only a microcosm of a much bigger cultural war that seeks to destabilize or erase the core values of Western culture.
Atheists attack Christianity, and not other religions, because they already know God exists and who He is.
Their irrational anger and hatred is evidence that they know God exists.
Why would anyone be angry at a Being who doesn't exist?
They demand proof when it is literally right in front of them.
The other evidence is that they accept abiogenesis and macroevolution without ever questioning it. Even though there is no evidence for abiogenesis or macroevolution.
Why do they never question abiogenesis and macroevolution?
Because they are the pillars upon which their delusion depends on.
They are already living a lie to begin with, so a few more can't hurt; especially if they support their position, even without evidence.
What a terrible existence for them, is there any wonder they are so angry?
( NastasyaFillipovna )
TIL : There is a guy in Japan who thinks he is a dog, and spent around $14K to look like one.
He failed some agility test ( for dogs ) today, so it was all over news.
But, no one is changing the definition of Homo-sapiens to include dogs, are they? Where is the inclusive language? Why do we have to change everything women to include TiMs, but not everything Human to include Dogs ?
Whats the difference?
( Persimmon64 )
Oh, just give it time.
Animals don't have "human rights." Men weren't banging on about how they were women before women had the right to vote, own property, or be seen as people in society. Parents weren't claiming their little boys were girls when girls weren't allowed to go to school or get a job or were being married off at 12 to be raped for the rest of their lives.
We don't have "magic hormones" or surgeries yet to make people look more like animals. Men weren't claiming they'd be suicidal without estrogen before synthetic hormones were developed. Men and women weren't claiming they'd die or couldn't exist in the world without cosmetic surgeries before medicine offered them that possibility.
With each new development in medicine and drugs, the narrative changes and people become more deranged. The moment medicine develops a way to make a functioning gill or wings, if that ever happens, I guarantee a portion of society will come out as "trans birds," claiming they've always felt different than other people, pointing to Native American tribes that believed people had "spirit animals" or reincarnation as animals in India to claim "trans animals" have always existed, and demanding they get these procedures done or they will "literally die."
[From “Russia is not an Aggressor, and Ukraine is not a Victim”]
It is widely accepted that the Ukrainian crisis erupted into a military conflict on February 24, 2022[…]Seeds of the hostilities were planted about thirty years earlier by President Clinton and, later, by George W. Bush, both of whom recklessly pushed for NATO’s eastward expansion
Over the years, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Putin repeatedly warned that Moscow would not tolerate continuing NATO’s “Drang nach Osten”[…]particularly Ukraine’s membership and the subsequent establishment of NATO military bases along the Russian border
On February 25, 2024, The New York Times published an article confirming Moscow’s fears[…]
The newspaper exposed how[…]the CIA has operated a network of twelve bases in Ukraine[…]
Would the United States accept the presence of Russian military bases on its borders?[…]Reagan ordered the invasion of Grenada[…]
Diplomacy was not given a chance because NATO needed to restore its image and validate its continued existence following a 30-year history of failure. The pursuit of “nation-building”[…]has accomplished neither[…]
Since a military alliance cannot exist without a rival, NATO's need for a credible enemy was an existential necessity. The Russian incursion into Ukraine could create the perception of a common threat[…]
For President Biden, who was desperate to escape the Afghanistan disaster, a victorious conflict would be a pivotal moment in his presidency[…]
Never in the realm of international relations was there a state that acted so consistently against its national interests. It put itself in grave danger when it announced its intention to join NATO in 2004, violating the 1997 Treaty on Friendship between Ukraine and the Russian Federation[…]
The preceding facts illustrate a common overriding interest among NATO leadership, its member states, and Ukraine in instigating the invasion[…]Russia was the sole party that attempted to prevent the conflict
[From “Lothrop Stoddard’s Ghost”]
Dark arts: the Carlyle Club is resurrecting the great Lothrop Stoddard to deliver a warning from the past. Spooky![…]
When I tell you that the name of book was The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy (1920), you will be able to hazard a guess as to why Lothrop Stoddard isn’t a household name[…]
White world-supremacy, politically speaking, was a simple fact[…]
Stoddard asked, “what assurance can the most impressive political panorama give us that the present world-order” — that is, white political world-supremacy — “may not swiftly and utterly pass away?”[…]
I think we can forgive Stoddard’s lumping together under “blacks,” along with the usual sub-Saharan African races, the[…]Aboriginal Australians, Papua New Guineans, and other Pacific Islanders. (Consider the similarity, not just in skin color, but also in certain societally relevant behavioral traits: low intelligence, high crime, rape[…]stabbing people, eating people, beheading sorcerers, general aggressiveness, welfare, etc)[…]
National Policy Institute reports that in 1960, white people still made up some 28 percent of the world’s population. By 2010, they were down to 16 percent. By 2060[…]white people will have dropped below 10 percent[…]
“Now what must be the inevitable result of all this?”[…]referring to the white birth rate declining while white political control caused everyone else’s birth rate to rise[…]
These protective dikes have been replaced by porous borders[…]in the name of ‘diversity,’ ‘multiculturalism,’ and ‘anti-racism’[…]
The sneaky practice of classifying anyone with any African ancestry — even if they’re visibly white, like Charles Drew — as simply “black,” for the purposes of inflating “black” accomplishments[…]or just muddying the waters of racial science[…]is hardly new[…]
Edward B. Reuter, President of the American Sociological Society, had this to say in his comprehensive 1918 book The Mulatto in the United States
Because atheists' are by definition learning disabled and dullards.
They can't even think that big to begin with. They think the movies Prometheus and Frankenstein are based on true stories.
Now that science is starting to refute Neverbiogenesis and Neverlution they'll be saying it was aliens that are our creators lol.
Anything but God you know.
They always toot their horn that they're so smart while believing that jello came alive one day from a lightning bolt hitting a mud puddle and then the jello compiled its own DNA from nothing and then populated the world with plants and animals lol.
Rofl
Now available on Amazon: “ground breaking and incredibly well researched”
THE NEEDLE'S SECRET: UNRAVELING THE MYSTERY OF VACCINE HARM, AND THE BOLUS THEORY REVOLUTION
https://t.co/7SaFQu7X0y
From amazon.com
2:38 AM · Mar 31, 2024 · 8,697 Views
47 Reposts 1 Quote 148 Likes 22 Bookmarks
Intelligent design vs. evolution has been the two main theories of life for centuries, and the Cambrian explosion favors ID, so another point for ID.
